Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
From the LA Times this morning. I am so making this on Sattidy!
@@@@@ Now You're Cooking! Export Format Buttercake Bakery's Marble Cake desserts 2 1/2 cups sugar, divided 1/2 cup unsweetened cocoa powder 1/4 cup light corn syrup 2 1/2 teaspoons vanilla extract, divided 2 2/3 cups flour 2 teaspoons baking powder 1/2 teaspoon salt 1 cup (2 sticks) butter 4 eggs 1 cup milk 1 cup chocolate chips powdered sugar for dusting 1. In a small saucepan, whisk together one-half cup of the sugar, the cocoa powder and corn syrup with one-half cup hot water. Bring just to a simmer, stirring occasionally. Add a half-teaspoon of vanilla off the heat and set aside. 2. Heat the oven to 350 degrees. Butter and lightly flour a 12-cup bundt pan. 3. In a medium bowl, combine the flour, baking powder and salt and set aside. In the bowl of a stand mixer (or in a large bowl if using a hand mixer), cream the butter with the remaining sugar until light and fluffy. Whisk in the eggs one at a time until thoroughly incorporated, then whisk in the remaining vanilla. 3. Whisk about a third of the flour mixture into the batter, then a third of the milk. Continue whisking in the flour mixture and milk, alternately and a little at a time, until everything is added and the batter is light and smooth. 4. Gently fold in the chocolate chips, then divide the batter into thirds. Pour a third of the batter into the prepared bundt pan. 5. Whisk the chocolate syrup with another third of batter, then pour this into the prepared bundt pan. Pour the remaining third of batter over this, lightly swirl the batters with a wooden skewer or knife to give a 'marble' effect and place the pan in the oven. 6. Bake the cake until a toothpick inserted comes out clean and the cake springs back lightly when touched, about 1 hour. Cool the cake in the pan on a wire rack. Invert the cooled cake onto a serving platter and dust lightly with powdered sugar. Contributor: LA Times Yield: 12 to 16 Preparation Time: 1 1/2 hours -- Terry "Squeaks" Pulliam Burd "Some weasel took the cork out of my lunch!" -- W.C. Fields |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Terry Pulliam Burd" > wrote in message ... > From the LA Times this morning. I am so making this on Sattidy! > > @@@@@ Now You're Cooking! Export Format > > Buttercake Bakery's Marble Cake > > desserts > > 2 1/2 cups sugar, divided > 1/2 cup unsweetened cocoa powder > 1/4 cup light corn syrup > 2 1/2 teaspoons vanilla extract, divided > 2 2/3 cups flour > 2 teaspoons baking powder > 1/2 teaspoon salt > 1 cup (2 sticks) butter > 4 eggs > 1 cup milk > 1 cup chocolate chips > powdered sugar for dusting Aw, Terry, you forgot to drop the brand names. Let's hear it for Domino, Scharffenberger, King Arthur, Penzey's, Kate's, etc. (I loathe emoticons, so just imagine a smiley!) Felice |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Terry Pulliam Burd wrote:
> From the LA Times this morning. I am so making this on Sattidy! I was hoping Jules Verne's prediction of edible newspapers was coming true. -- Dan Goodman "I have always depended on the kindness of stranglers." Tennessee Williams, A Streetcar Named Expire Journal http://dsgood.livejournal.com Futures http://clerkfuturist.wordpress.com mirror 1: http://dsgood.insanejournal.com mirror 2: http://dsgood.wordpress.com Links http://del.icio.us/dsgood |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article >,
"Felice" > wrote: > "Terry Pulliam Burd" > wrote in message > ... > > From the LA Times this morning. I am so making this on Sattidy! > > > > @@@@@ Now You're Cooking! Export Format > > > > Buttercake Bakery's Marble Cake > > > > desserts > > > > 2 1/2 cups sugar, divided > > 1/2 cup unsweetened cocoa powder > > 1/4 cup light corn syrup > > 2 1/2 teaspoons vanilla extract, divided > > 2 2/3 cups flour > > 2 teaspoons baking powder > > 1/2 teaspoon salt > > 1 cup (2 sticks) butter > > 4 eggs > > 1 cup milk > > 1 cup chocolate chips > > powdered sugar for dusting > > Aw, Terry, you forgot to drop the brand names. Let's hear it for Domino, > Scharffenberger, King Arthur, Penzey's, Kate's, etc. > > (I loathe emoticons, so just imagine a smiley!) > > Felice ROFL! Shame on you, Fleece!! Shame on you!! -- -Barb, Mother Superior, HOSSSPoJ Huffy and Bubbles Do France: http://www.jamlady.eboard.com |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 16:30:50 -0500, Melba's Jammin'
> fired up random neurons and synapses to opine: >> Aw, Terry, you forgot to drop the brand names. Let's hear it for Domino, >> Scharffenberger, King Arthur, Penzey's, Kate's, etc. >> >> (I loathe emoticons, so just imagine a smiley!) >> >> Felice > >ROFL! >Shame on you, Fleece!! Shame on you!! You are both bratty broads - and I love you both! But you gotta admit, that's a good lookin' recipe. Will report back this weekend (if I survive tomorrow at the LA City attorney's office a-f*ckin'-gin). Terry "Squeaks" Pulliam Burd -- "If the soup had been as hot as the claret, if the claret had been as old as the bird, and if the bird's breasts had been as full as the waitress's, it would have been a very good dinner." -- Duncan Hines To reply, replace "meatloaf" with "cox" |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article >,
Terry Pulliam Burd > wrote: > From the LA Times this morning. I am so making this on Sattidy! > > @@@@@ Now You're Cooking! Export Format > > Buttercake Bakery's Marble Cake Recipe saved, prepared, and in the oven as we speak. Been a long time since I've baked a cake; They say time to prepare and bake is 1-1/2 hours; it took me 50 minutes to get it mixed and into the pan. I used a flat whisk for all the whisking named in the recipe. I'll report on the outcome later. -- -Barb, Mother Superior, HOSSSPoJ Huffy and Bubbles Do France: http://www.jamlady.eboard.com |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article >,
Terry Pulliam Burd > wrote: > From the LA Times this morning. I am so making this on Sattidy! > > @@@@@ Now You're Cooking! Export Format > > Buttercake Bakery's Marble Cake (recipe saved, prepared, and tasted.) It's pretty good, although I had a section of the top stick to the pan and spoil its appearance. If I ever make it again (not likely, but one never knows about these things), I might arrange the batter differently; the marbling isn't as clean as I'd like it to be. Guy at the Apple store thought it was frabjous. I'll bring some to my manicurist tonight ("Let her eat cake!"), a piece to The Widow Dorothy, and maybe some to Niece Sandra when we see her tomorrow. Or not. Rob likes it. -- -Barb, Mother Superior, HOSSSPoJ Huffy and Bubbles Do France: http://www.jamlady.eboard.com |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 12 Jun 2008 08:17:59 -0500, Melba's Jammin'
> fired up random neurons and synapses to opine: >In article >, > Terry Pulliam Burd > wrote: > >> From the LA Times this morning. I am so making this on Sattidy! >> >> @@@@@ Now You're Cooking! Export Format >> >> Buttercake Bakery's Marble Cake > >Recipe saved, prepared, and in the oven as we speak. >Been a long time since I've baked a cake; They say time to prepare and >bake is 1-1/2 hours; it took me 50 minutes to get it mixed and into the >pan. I used a flat whisk for all the whisking named in the recipe. > >I'll report on the outcome later. So, you be home, toots? Welcome back. And I wish someone would win the lottery for me so *I* could be home during the week to bake :-( Terry "Squeaks" Pulliam Burd -- "If the soup had been as hot as the claret, if the claret had been as old as the bird, and if the bird's breasts had been as full as the waitress's, it would have been a very good dinner." -- Duncan Hines To reply, replace "meatloaf" with "cox" |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Terry Pulliam Burd > wrote in
: > From the LA Times this morning. I am so making this on Sattidy! > > @@@@@ Now You're Cooking! Export Format > > Buttercake Bakery's Marble Cake > All I need is the chocolate chips, and this is a goer. If I can get some today, I'll be making it this weekend. Thanxs for the recipe :-) -- Peter Lucas Brisbane Australia The path of a warrior never deviating, one has to become not just a part of nature but a force of nature, acting in accordance with the laws of the universe. (Getsumei No Michi, the Moonlit Path) |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article > ,
PeterLucas > wrote: > Melba's Jammin' > wrote in news:barbschaller- > Didn't grease the pan enough? Don't know. I thought I did. I might have disturbed it in the marbling. > > If I ever make it again (not likely, but one never knows about > > these things), I might arrange the batter differently; the marbling > > isn't as clean as I'd like it to be. > How would you arrange the batter to make it better? Good question. I think I'd be inclined to put the batter in in big dollops, 2 white to 1 dark and maybe do a little marbling as I went. Could be I was overzealous in my marbling. I just know that I'm not crazy about the look of it. -- -Barb, Mother Superior, HOSSSPoJ Huffy and Bubbles Do France: http://www.jamlady.eboard.com |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article >,
Terry Pulliam Burd > wrote: > On Thu, 12 Jun 2008 08:17:59 -0500, Melba's Jammin' > > fired up random neurons and synapses to > opine: > > >In article >, > > Terry Pulliam Burd > wrote: > > > >> From the LA Times this morning. I am so making this on Sattidy! > >> > >> @@@@@ Now You're Cooking! Export Format > >> > >> Buttercake Bakery's Marble Cake > > > >Recipe saved, prepared, and in the oven as we speak. > >Been a long time since I've baked a cake; They say time to prepare and > >bake is 1-1/2 hours; it took me 50 minutes to get it mixed and into the > >pan. I used a flat whisk for all the whisking named in the recipe. > > > >I'll report on the outcome later. > > So, you be home, toots? Welcome back. Thanks. Got home on Sunday night. I'm almost done being cross-eyed from the jet lag. > > And I wish someone would win the lottery for me so *I* could be home > during the week to bake :-( > > Terry "Squeaks" Pulliam Burd If you'd leave Jimmy Choo alone, you could afford to be. "-) -- -Barb, Mother Superior, HOSSSPoJ Huffy and Bubbles Do France: http://www.jamlady.eboard.com |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu 12 Jun 2008 07:18:22p, Melba's Jammin' told us...
> In article > , > PeterLucas > wrote: > >> Melba's Jammin' > wrote in news:barbschaller- > >> Didn't grease the pan enough? > > Don't know. I thought I did. I might have disturbed it in the marbling. > >> > If I ever make it again (not likely, but one never knows about >> > these things), I might arrange the batter differently; the marbling >> > isn't as clean as I'd like it to be. > >> How would you arrange the batter to make it better? > > Good question. I think I'd be inclined to put the batter in in big > dollops, 2 white to 1 dark and maybe do a little marbling as I went. > Could be I was overzealous in my marbling. I just know that I'm not > crazy about the look of it. > Yes, you were over-zealous (but that doesn't surprise me, because you're always so damned thorough). :-) I've not made this particular recipe, but have made many marble cakes. You have the right idea in using big dollops. Use the cutting edge of a table knife to make passes through the various dollops, but definitely don't overdo it. Obviously, the goal is to have distinct largish areas of light and dark with swirls of the alternate color running through them. I generally make a *few* figure eight passes through the batters and let it go at that. -- Wayne Boatwright ------------------------------------------- Thursday, 06(VI)/12(XII)/08(MMVIII) ------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------- Excuse me while I sharpen my tongue. ------------------------------------------- |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article 0>,
Wayne Boatwright > wrote: > running through them. I generally make a *few* figure eight passes through > the batters and let it go at that. Right. Great in a round layer pan; not so easy to do it in the bundt pan, though. -- -Barb, Mother Superior, HOSSSPoJ Huffy and Bubbles Do France: http://www.jamlady.eboard.com |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu 12 Jun 2008 08:45:47p, Melba's Jammin' told us...
> In article 0>, > Wayne Boatwright > wrote: > >> running through them. I generally make a *few* figure eight passes >> through the batters and let it go at that. > > Right. Great in a round layer pan; not so easy to do it in the bundt > pan, though. > Haven't done it in a bundt pan, but I have done it in a thick (~3") layer in a springform pan with decorative bottom. It worked. -- Wayne Boatwright ------------------------------------------- Thursday, 06(VI)/12(XII)/08(MMVIII) ------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------- When all else fails, let a = 7. If that doesn't work, read the manual. ------------------------------------------- |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
> > From the LATimesthis morning. I am so making this on Sattidy!
> > > @@@@@ Now You're Cooking! Export Format > > > Buttercake Bakery's Marble Cake > > (recipe saved, prepared, and tasted.) > > It's pretty good, although *I had a section of the top stick to the pan > and spoil its appearance. *If I ever make it again (not likely, but one > never knows about these things), I might arrange the batter differently; > the marbling isn't as clean as I'd like it to be. > The same "stickiness" happened to mine. I took it to work, and it wasn't gone by noon, which made me think I ought to taste it. I thought it was terrible, relatively speaking, and promptly threw out the recipe. It was too dry; the batters couldn't hold the chips and they all ended up on the bottom (top); and it was pretty tasteless, even with my $20/bottle vanilla and good chocolate. I also thought the chocolate "syrup" was too thin and there was too much of it. Still, I followed the recipe and I'm a good baker. This is just my opinion, of course, but I won't be making it again. Not your fault, Squeaks... ;-) N. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 06:38:18 -0700 (PDT), Nancy2
> wrote: >I thought it was terrible, relatively speaking, and promptly threw out >the recipe. It was too dry; the batters couldn't hold the chips and >they all ended up on the bottom (top); and it was pretty tasteless, >even with my $20/bottle vanilla and good chocolate. I also thought >the chocolate "syrup" was too thin and there was too much of it. >Still, I followed the recipe and I'm a good baker. > >This is just my opinion, of course, but I won't be making it again. >Not your fault, Squeaks... ;-) Well, this is good to know - damn. Recipe "read" well, but I've been fooled before and I've obviously been fooled again. Terry "Squeaks" Pulliam Burd -- "If the soup had been as hot as the claret, if the claret had been as old as the bird, and if the bird's breasts had been as full as the waitress's, it would have been a very good dinner." -- Duncan Hines To reply, replace "meatloaf" with "cox" |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 16:27:42 -0700, Terryl Pulliam Burd
> wrote: >On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 06:38:18 -0700 (PDT), Nancy2 > wrote: > >>I thought it was terrible, relatively speaking, and promptly threw out >>the recipe. It was too dry; the batters couldn't hold the chips and >>they all ended up on the bottom (top); and it was pretty tasteless, >>even with my $20/bottle vanilla and good chocolate. I also thought >>the chocolate "syrup" was too thin and there was too much of it. >>Still, I followed the recipe and I'm a good baker. >> >>This is just my opinion, of course, but I won't be making it again. >>Not your fault, Squeaks... ;-) > >Well, this is good to know - damn. Recipe "read" well, but I've been >fooled before and I've obviously been fooled again. > >Terry "Squeaks" Pulliam Burd Ok...I think I solved this one. 1. I did not just "whisk" in the dry ingredients, I used a hand mixer on medium. This helped with the texture. 2. I substituted (whole) buttermilk for the milk in the recipe. This made the batter just a tad thicker that I thought it should be, so I added an additional quarter cup of milk. It was still very thick. 3. I used extra-large eggs, not large. 4. I used dollops of batter when filling the pan, smoothing the bottom layer with a rubber spatula to make it even. I then poured the chocolate portion over the bottom layer. It was much more liquid, obviously, so I just made sure the bundt pan was level, then put the dollops for the top layer in, being very careful when smoothing down this layer, and doing it in one motion, never lifting the spatula from the batter until I had made a complete circle around. Then I ran a dinner knife though the batter, in a bull's eye movement, from the inner part of the pan, around towards the outer part, turning the pan three times. Not the usual marbling, but easier to do with a molded pan. 5. I baked it using the convection setting, and kept it in maybe 10-15 minutes longer than called for. 6. I added about a cup of roughly chopped pecans, but that's because I think everything short of sex is better with pecans. It is moist, it is tasty, it got raves, it is almost gone. Fear not to tweak the original a bit. Next time I will try sour cream, instead of the milk. It's already death in a bundt pan, so what the heck. http://www.flickr.com/photos/25648800@N04/ Boron |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Boron Elgar > wrote in
<snip> > 6. I added about a cup of roughly chopped pecans, but that's because I > think everything short of sex is better with pecans. > I bet there is someone, somewhere, who would be willing to challenge you on that bit... Saerah (also a fan of pecans in nearly anything I can think of) |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
sarah gray > wrote in
. 102: > Boron Elgar > wrote in > <snip> > >> 6. I added about a cup of roughly chopped pecans, but that's because >> I think everything short of sex is better with pecans. >> > > I bet there is someone, somewhere, who would be willing to challenge > you on that bit... > > Saerah (also a fan of pecans in nearly anything I can think of) > > doesn't that depend up on whether the pecans are crushed or chopped? -- The house of the burning beet-Alan |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
hahabogus > wrote in news:Xns9AF6D88103D2Bhahabogus@
69.16.185.250: > sarah gray > wrote in > . 102: > >> Boron Elgar > wrote in >> <snip> >> >>> 6. I added about a cup of roughly chopped pecans, but that's because >>> I think everything short of sex is better with pecans. >>> >> >> I bet there is someone, somewhere, who would be willing to challenge >> you on that bit... >> >> Saerah (also a fan of pecans in nearly anything I can think of) >> >> > > doesn't that depend up on whether the pecans are crushed or chopped? > hmmm... in chocolate syrup? sprinkled on whipped cream? to be honest, I think food goes well before or after sex, but not during ![]() Saerah |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
sarah gray wrote:
> hahabogus > wrote in news:Xns9AF6D88103D2Bhahabogus@ > 69.16.185.250: > >> sarah gray > wrote in >> . 102: >> >>> Boron Elgar > wrote in >>> <snip> >>> >>>> 6. I added about a cup of roughly chopped pecans, but that's because >>>> I think everything short of sex is better with pecans. >>>> >>> >>> I bet there is someone, somewhere, who would be willing to challenge >>> you on that bit... >>> >>> Saerah (also a fan of pecans in nearly anything I can think of) >>> >>> >> >> doesn't that depend up on whether the pecans are crushed or chopped? >> > > hmmm... in chocolate syrup? sprinkled on whipped cream? > > to be honest, I think food goes well before or after sex, but not during > ![]() Well, not all of us have to worry about the kosher rules while we're doin' it. ![]() -- Blinky Killing all posts from Google Groups The Usenet Improvement Project: http://improve-usenet.org Need a new news feed? http://blinkynet.net/comp/newfeed.html |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Blinky the Shark > wrote in
news ![]() > sarah gray wrote: > >> hahabogus > wrote in >> news:Xns9AF6D88103D2Bhahabogus@ 69.16.185.250: >> >>> sarah gray > wrote in >>> . 102: >>> >>>> Boron Elgar > wrote in >>>> <snip> >>>> >>>>> 6. I added about a cup of roughly chopped pecans, but that's >>>>> because I think everything short of sex is better with pecans. >>>>> >>>> >>>> I bet there is someone, somewhere, who would be willing to >>>> challenge you on that bit... >>>> >>>> Saerah (also a fan of pecans in nearly anything I can think of) >>>> >>>> >>> >>> doesn't that depend up on whether the pecans are crushed or chopped? >>> >> >> hmmm... in chocolate syrup? sprinkled on whipped cream? >> >> to be honest, I think food goes well before or after sex, but not >> during >> ![]() > > Well, not all of us have to worry about the kosher rules while we're > doin' it. ![]() > > hey, pecans are pareve! Saerah (who doesn't keep kosher) |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
sarah gray wrote:
> Blinky the Shark > wrote in > news ![]() >> sarah gray wrote: >> >>> hahabogus > wrote in >>> news:Xns9AF6D88103D2Bhahabogus@ 69.16.185.250: >>> >>>> sarah gray > wrote in >>>> . 102: >>>> >>>>> Boron Elgar > wrote in >>>>> <snip> >>>>> >>>>>> 6. I added about a cup of roughly chopped pecans, but that's >>>>>> because I think everything short of sex is better with pecans. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I bet there is someone, somewhere, who would be willing to >>>>> challenge you on that bit... >>>>> >>>>> Saerah (also a fan of pecans in nearly anything I can think of) >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> doesn't that depend up on whether the pecans are crushed or chopped? >>>> >>> >>> hmmm... in chocolate syrup? sprinkled on whipped cream? >>> >>> to be honest, I think food goes well before or after sex, but not >>> during >>> ![]() >> >> Well, not all of us have to worry about the kosher rules while we're >> doin' it. ![]() >> >> > > hey, pecans are pareve! > > Saerah (who doesn't keep kosher) Come to think of it, I *think* I did see a shot of some shrimp in one of your galleries. I mean, I took it to be something you ate; I'd be surprised to find that photographing shrimp was forbidden. -- Blinky Killing all posts from Google Groups The Usenet Improvement Project: http://improve-usenet.org Need a new news feed? http://blinkynet.net/comp/newfeed.html |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Blinky the Shark > wrote in
news ![]() > sarah gray wrote: > >> Blinky the Shark > wrote in >> news ![]() >>> sarah gray wrote: >>> >>>> hahabogus > wrote in >>>> news:Xns9AF6D88103D2Bhahabogus@ 69.16.185.250: >>>> >>>>> sarah gray > wrote in >>>>> . 102: >>>>> >>>>>> Boron Elgar > wrote in >>>>>> <snip> >>>>>> >>>>>>> 6. I added about a cup of roughly chopped pecans, but that's >>>>>>> because I think everything short of sex is better with pecans. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I bet there is someone, somewhere, who would be willing to >>>>>> challenge you on that bit... >>>>>> >>>>>> Saerah (also a fan of pecans in nearly anything I can think of) >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> doesn't that depend up on whether the pecans are crushed or chopped? >>>>> >>>> >>>> hmmm... in chocolate syrup? sprinkled on whipped cream? >>>> >>>> to be honest, I think food goes well before or after sex, but not >>>> during >>>> ![]() >>> >>> Well, not all of us have to worry about the kosher rules while we're >>> doin' it. ![]() >>> >>> >> >> hey, pecans are pareve! >> >> Saerah (who doesn't keep kosher) > > Come to think of it, I *think* I did see a shot of some shrimp in one of > your galleries. I mean, I took it to be something you ate; I'd be > surprised to find that photographing shrimp was forbidden. > > I would have thought that the cheeseburgers and the torn-apart lobster might have clued you in, as well ![]() Saerah (once you have bacon and sea bugs, you can never go back!) |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
sarah gray wrote:
> Blinky the Shark > wrote in > news ![]() >> sarah gray wrote: >> >>> Blinky the Shark > wrote in >>> news ![]() >>>> sarah gray wrote: >>>> >>>>> hahabogus > wrote in >>>>> news:Xns9AF6D88103D2Bhahabogus@ 69.16.185.250: >>>>> >>>>>> sarah gray > wrote in >>>>>> . 102: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Boron Elgar > wrote in >>>>>>> <snip> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 6. I added about a cup of roughly chopped pecans, but that's >>>>>>>> because I think everything short of sex is better with pecans. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I bet there is someone, somewhere, who would be willing to >>>>>>> challenge you on that bit... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Saerah (also a fan of pecans in nearly anything I can think of) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> doesn't that depend up on whether the pecans are crushed or > chopped? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> hmmm... in chocolate syrup? sprinkled on whipped cream? >>>>> >>>>> to be honest, I think food goes well before or after sex, but not >>>>> during >>>>> ![]() >>>> >>>> Well, not all of us have to worry about the kosher rules while we're >>>> doin' it. ![]() >>>> >>>> >>> >>> hey, pecans are pareve! >>> >>> Saerah (who doesn't keep kosher) >> >> Come to think of it, I *think* I did see a shot of some shrimp in one > of >> your galleries. I mean, I took it to be something you ate; I'd be >> surprised to find that photographing shrimp was forbidden. >> >> > > I would have thought that the cheeseburgers and the torn-apart lobster Didn't see the dairy'n'meat combo from Old Testament hell, there. ![]() Perhaps it was the lobster I saw, not shrimp. I did not view all what -- 6,000 images? -- Blinky Killing all posts from Google Groups The Usenet Improvement Project: http://improve-usenet.org Need a new news feed? http://blinkynet.net/comp/newfeed.html |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Blinky the Shark > wrote in
news ![]() > sarah gray wrote: > >> Blinky the Shark > wrote in >> news ![]() >>> sarah gray wrote: >>> >>>> Blinky the Shark > wrote in >>>> news ![]() >>>>> sarah gray wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> hahabogus > wrote in >>>>>> news:Xns9AF6D88103D2Bhahabogus@ 69.16.185.250: >>>>>> >>>>>>> sarah gray > wrote in >>>>>>> . 102: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Boron Elgar > wrote in >>>>>>>> <snip> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> 6. I added about a cup of roughly chopped pecans, but that's >>>>>>>>> because I think everything short of sex is better with pecans. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I bet there is someone, somewhere, who would be willing to >>>>>>>> challenge you on that bit... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Saerah (also a fan of pecans in nearly anything I can think of) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> doesn't that depend up on whether the pecans are crushed or >> chopped? >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> hmmm... in chocolate syrup? sprinkled on whipped cream? >>>>>> >>>>>> to be honest, I think food goes well before or after sex, but not >>>>>> during >>>>>> ![]() >>>>> >>>>> Well, not all of us have to worry about the kosher rules while we're >>>>> doin' it. ![]() >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> hey, pecans are pareve! >>>> >>>> Saerah (who doesn't keep kosher) >>> >>> Come to think of it, I *think* I did see a shot of some shrimp in one >> of >>> your galleries. I mean, I took it to be something you ate; I'd be >>> surprised to find that photographing shrimp was forbidden. >>> >>> >> >> I would have thought that the cheeseburgers and the torn-apart lobster > > Didn't see the dairy'n'meat combo from Old Testament hell, there. ![]() > > Perhaps it was the lobster I saw, not shrimp. I did not view all what -- > 6,000 images? > 6841. 571 of food. thank god for digital photography ![]() Saerah |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
2 LA Times Recipes | General Cooking | |||
Slavery times... | General Cooking | |||
First Times | Sushi | |||
Cooking times | Barbecue | |||
"Iced Tea" myth again; Historical NY Times, LA Times, Chicago Tribune for $50 | Historic |