"Bob Terwilliger" > wrote :
>
> Growing up in Maryland and eating lots of blue crab does not automatically
> confer any knowledge of wine, crab-louse. The question was about wine, and
> your tastes are most decidedly NOT those of the general public. Why should
> people assume that the OP's guests had tastes which were as off-kilter as
> yours?
>

Once again, you offer a non sequitur. The question was about what wine to
serve with crab cakes. The question was not "What would you say the
GENERAL PUBLIC would like in a wine to drink with crab cakes?"

hahaha, *sigh*

And I never said my tastes reflected that of the "general public," since the
very
concept of "the general public's taste in wine" is as addled as you are.
Jesus,
Bob. Why not just walk around with a sign that says "I'm stupid but I can't
stop typing?

>
>
>> What happened was, others posted immediately that they thought a sweet
>> German wine, such as Alsace or Gewurtztraminer would be very nice. The
>> thought turns my stomach, still.
>
> Yah-shure-what-the-****-ever. Nobody cares now. That's why I didn't
> mention you specifically in what I wrote previously.

Oh now this reawwy, reawwy huwts. What you mean is, you don't recall the
specifics of the thread you used as an example for, whateverthe****, so it's
just, like, "whatever." lol


>
>
>
>> Sure, it's a matter of personal taste. Mine did not differ from that of
>> the OP, who had no opinion or would not have posted the question, right?
>
> Did you THINK before you wrote that last sentence? How do you assume that
> if someone expresses no opinion, then his or her opinion must agree with
> yours? That's stupid. Do you also assume that undecided voters are all
> going to vote for the same candidate you favor?

Okay, I am going to type slowwwly, so that you might understand. Are
you ready now? Wait, let me wipe that bit of drool off your shirt.

My taste does not differ from that of the OP in that his and mine are both
personal. Subjective. (Take a minute to look it up.) Just like that of
anyone
who offered an opinion. All answers would be "what wine I like with crab
cakes." All subjective. And it matters not what the "general consensus" is
when it comes to taste buds.

>> Mine differed from that of the dickweeds who thought sweet wine
>> complements crab.
>
> Let's just re-word that more appropriately: Your bizarre and
> alcohol-centric tastes differed from those better-informed people who
> posted the opinions of acknowledged wine experts, and for some inane
> reason you took that personally.

"Alcohol centric?" WAH hahaha! Yepper. That's really brilliant.
As for taking anything in Usenet personally, well, that is your department.


>> Maybe you meant to say that MY personal tastes differed from that of many
>> of your widdle fwends, even those who said that "such and such an expert
>> always said that sweet wine is best with crab."
>
> Maybe you meant to say that you are a ****ing idiot who is unable to
> recognize the validity of the opinions of others.

They're ALL valid, ****face. It's all subjective when it comes to things
like
this. I said dry would be better, others said sweet, I said "euuuyuu," they
said the same only coached it in terms like "Robert Dickcheese of Gourmet
Poseurs asserted that ..."


>
>> You need a nice superhero suit with SSM on the front.
>>
>> Supercilious Sanctimonious Man.
>
> Thank you for openly applauding my superiority. You may go now.
>
>

I wish I could say that you are a funny, funny little man.

You're just a tiresome little man with a major tiny dick complex.

But please don't go. I am kind hearted and long to give you a chance
to redeem yourself.

Really.

Jill wrote:

> I'd like citations, please. I may think something is disgusting but I
> rarely reply to "anyone have a recipe for...." posts if I don't have one
> or a site where someone can get one. I may reply to posts suggesting what
> I think are weird food combinations as saying they sound disgusting
> together. But otherwise I have no idea what you're talking about.

I really didn't want to (because I'm in my office now which is hotter than
the hinges of Hades, and I'd rather be hanging out somewhere nicely cooled.)
But here are a couple which touch on the issue:

Message-ID:
Message-ID:


Here's one where I took you to task for pointless judgmentalism:
Message-ID:


Here's another:
Message-ID:


Regardless, I'm *still* not a Jill-hater.


> And that wasn't ME.

True. That's why I didn't say it was you. Since that post, cybercat has
proudly leapt forward to claim her "****tard-of-the-month" title.



> I don't often recommend wines because I don't pretend
> to be a wine maven. Having said that, crab tends to be sweet in and of
> itself and would be better complimented by a slightly dry white

NO! YOU'RE *WRONG*! :-)

When it comes to wine, I think people take it way too seriously. I got a
GREAT laugh out of reading a story where a celebrity host served a red-dyed
white wine to a group of self-styled wine experts who were unable to tell
that they were drinking a white wine.

In the crab cake thread, the wine was to be served both with the crab cakes
and a coconut rice which was also bound to be slightly sweet. I think a dry
wine would come across as bitter and vinegary; my recommendation was for a
blend of Sauvignon Blanc and Semillon, which would be about the same level
of sweetness as the food. But of course the ultimate decision was with the
guy who was serving the meal, and I don't believe we ever found out what was
served.

Bob

cybercat leaked:

>> Growing up in Maryland and eating lots of blue crab does not
>> automatically confer any knowledge of wine, crab-louse. The question was
>> about wine, and your tastes are most decidedly NOT those of the general
>> public. Why should people assume that the OP's guests had tastes which
>> were as off-kilter as yours?
>>
>
> Once again, you offer a non sequitur. The question was about what wine to
> serve with crab cakes. The question was not "What would you say the
> GENERAL PUBLIC would like in a wine to drink with crab cakes?"

You think it's a non sequitur only because you are very stupid. When the OP
didn't give any particulars about his guests, the safest answer is that
which satisfies the tastes of the general public.

NOW do you get it?



> And I never said my tastes reflected that of the "general public," since
> the very concept of "the general public's taste in wine" is as addled as
> you are.

So you admit that your tastes are not in line with what the OP's guests are
likely to like, but you make recommendations for them anyway based on what
YOU would like? Don't you see the logical disconnect there?



> Jesus,
> Bob. Why not just walk around with a sign that says "I'm stupid but I
> can't
> stop typing?

Jesus, Limburger-crotch, why not just walk around with a sign that says
nothing? And keep walking until I tell you to stop?



>>> What happened was, others posted immediately that they thought a sweet
>>> German wine, such as Alsace or Gewurtztraminer would be very nice. The
>>> thought turns my stomach, still.
>>
>> Yah-shure-what-the-****-ever. Nobody cares now. That's why I didn't
>> mention you specifically in what I wrote previously.
>
> Oh now this reawwy, reawwy huwts. What you mean is, you don't recall the
> specifics of the thread you used as an example for, whateverthe****, so
> it's just, like, "whatever." lol

What I mean is that there's no point in wasting the time of the people who
read this newsgroup with a dead issue. But you don't seem to think it's
dead -- maybe you just can't tell that it's dead; maybe you've lost your
sense of smell; that would explain the hygiene issues Greg mentions so
often.



>>> Sure, it's a matter of personal taste. Mine did not differ from that of
>>> the OP, who had no opinion or would not have posted the question, right?
>>
>> Did you THINK before you wrote that last sentence? How do you assume that
>> if someone expresses no opinion, then his or her opinion must agree with
>> yours? That's stupid. Do you also assume that undecided voters are all
>> going to vote for the same candidate you favor?
>
> My taste does not differ from that of the OP in that his and mine are both
> personal. Subjective. (Take a minute to look it up.) Just like that of
> anyone who offered an opinion. All answers would be "what wine I like with
> crab cakes." All subjective. And it matters not what the "general
> consensus" is when it comes to taste buds.

BZZZZZT! Sorry, still a stupid answer: You wrote "Mine did not differ from
that of the OP", and now you're trying to backtrack from that by stupidly
claiming that since all opinions are subjective, they're all the same -- and
that claim is both clearly written above, clearly false, and clearly stupid.



>> Maybe you meant to say that you are a ****ing idiot who is unable to
>> recognize the validity of the opinions of others.
>
> They're ALL valid, ****face. It's all subjective when it comes to things
> like this. I said dry would be better, others said sweet, I said
> "euuuyuu," they said the same only coached it in terms like "Robert
> Dickcheese of Gourmet Poseurs asserted that ..."

....and NOW you say that all opinions are valid, but THEN you said that
everybody else was wrong, posting "too sweet" again and again. How do you
reconcile that contradiction? I guess the answer is that you have been
caught in a lie -- and SO EASILY!

Your mental master,

Bob

On Jun 19, 2:36*pm, "jmcquown" > wrote:
> Lou Decruss wrote:
> > On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 19:06:11 +0100, Samantha Lewis wrote:
>
> >> On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 19:52:09 +0200, "Michael Kuettner"
> >> > wrote:
>
> >>> <Samantha Lewis> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
> ...
> >>>> Be sure to say the following:
>
> >>>> Cthulhu, father of us all,
> >>>> This meal is a sign of Your undying hate for us:
> >>>> Devour us and drink our blood,
> >>>> And help us to give you glory each day
> >>>> Through your minions skinning us alive.
>
> >>> I fixed your post for you.
>
> >>> Cheers,
>
> >>> Michael Kuettner
>
> >> You are a bad person Michael.
>
> > I think Michael it pretty cool. *Aren't you religious trolls not
> > supposed to judge?
>
> Yep, that's what I love about all those "good Christians" - they're
> frequently judgemental, rude and always have to impose their beliefs on
> everyone else. *They're the same folks who rail against things like drinking
> and (Baptists, at least) dancing (OMG! Dancing might lead to fornication!!).
> They're also the first to break their own rules when it's not Sunday.

Rock'n Roll is pro-fornication
>
> Jill

--Bryan

Michael "Dog3" > wrote in message
.. .
> The Ranger >
> :
> in rec.food.cooking
>> On Jun 19, 11:56 am, "Michael \"Dog3\""
>> > wrote:

>> [major snippage]
>>> Maybe I can have a martini when I get to hell
>>>
>> It'd be a dirty -- or worse, V-O-D-K-A -- martini.
>>
> It'd be both str8 up in a chilled glass.
>
LOL. Maybe when Lucifer was prepping it in front of you but by
the time you reached for it he'd have pranked it. He just
doesn't seem the type to served a "shaken, not stirred"
top-shelf.

The Ranger

"Samantha Lewis" wrote in message
...
> Be sure to say the following:
>
>
> Father of us all,
> This meal is a sign of Your love for us:
> Bless us and bless our food,
> And help us to give you glory each day
> Through Jesus Christ our Lord.
>
> Amen!
>

Why did you post this here for Samantha?...Don't you read in God's word 'Not
to cast your pearls before the swine!

It will only bring derision on the word from Unbelievers...

Bigbazza

"Bigbazza" > wrote in
:

>
> "Samantha Lewis" wrote in message
> ...
>> Be sure to say the following:
>>
>>
>> Father of us all,


That promiscuous *******!!



>> This meal is a sign of Your love for us:



What??!! Even Baked Beans?



>> Bless us and bless our food,


Over the teeth, and past the gums,
Look out guts, here it comes.



>> And help us to give you glory each day



What for? The ******* doesn't deserve it.


>> Through Jesus Christ our Lord.
>>


He's yours, apparently.

I'd appreciate it if you go stick him where the sun don't shine.


>
> It will only bring derision on the word from Unbelievers...
>



Funny. Never thought of you as a God-botherer.


--
Peter Lucas
Brisbane
Australia


The path of a warrior never deviating,
one has to become not just a part of nature
but a force of nature,
acting in accordance with the laws of the universe.
(Getsumei No Michi, the Moonlit Path)

Bob Terwilliger wrote cyberBOOB:.

> What I mean is that there's no point in wasting the time of the people who
> read this newsgroup with a dead issue. But you don't seem to think it's
> dead -- maybe you just can't tell that it's dead; maybe you've lost your
> sense of smell; that would explain the hygiene issues Greg mentions so
> often.


"Ka - CHING...!!!"

<chuckle>


--
Best
Greg

" I find Greg Morrow lowbrow, witless, and obnoxious. For him to claim that
we are some
kind of comedy team turns my stomach."
- "cybercat" to me on rec.food.cooking

On Fri, 20 Jun 2008 00:09:57 -0700, "Bob Terwilliger"
> wrote:

>I think Jill has a guilty conscience in that respect. After all, how many
>times has someone posted something like this:
>
>
>"Does anybody have a recipe for ______?"
>
>and had Jill respond with:
>
>"Not me! I think _____ is disgusting!"
>
>
>She has done that dozens if not hundreds of times, and what's the point?

OK, name 5 specific times... I can't think of one.



--
I never worry about diets. The only carrots that interest me are the number of carats in a diamond.

Mae West

On Fri, 20 Jun 2008 13:11:41 GMT, "Michael \"Dog3\""
> wrote:

>"cybercat" >
: in rec.food.cooking
>
>>
>> I wish I could say that you are a funny, funny little man.
>>
>> You're just a tiresome little man with a major tiny dick complex.
>>
>> But please don't go. I am kind hearted and long to give you a chance
>> to redeem yourself.
>>
>> Really.
>
>I can smell you fear of Bob clear over here.
>
Fear? She's loving him right now.



--
I never worry about diets. The only carrots that interest me are the number of carats in a diamond.

Mae West

"sf" <.> wrote in message ...
> On Fri, 20 Jun 2008 00:09:57 -0700, "Bob Terwilliger"
> > wrote:
>
>>I think Jill has a guilty conscience in that respect. After all, how many
>>times has someone posted something like this:
>>
>>
>>"Does anybody have a recipe for ______?"
>>
>>and had Jill respond with:
>>
>>"Not me! I think _____ is disgusting!"
>>
>>
>>She has done that dozens if not hundreds of times, and what's the point?
>
> OK, name 5 specific times... I can't think of one.
>
>
Bob is clearly having his period. Let's cut the girl some slack.

"sf" <.> wrote in message ...
> On Fri, 20 Jun 2008 13:11:41 GMT, "Michael \"Dog3\""
> > wrote:
>
>>"cybercat" >
: in rec.food.cooking
>>
>>>
>>> I wish I could say that you are a funny, funny little man.
>>>
>>> You're just a tiresome little man with a major tiny dick complex.
>>>
>>> But please don't go. I am kind hearted and long to give you a chance
>>> to redeem yourself.
>>>
>>> Really.
>>
>>I can smell you fear of Bob clear over here.
>>
> Fear? She's loving him right now.
>
>
Indeed, my heart is full of light.

Was that Mikey "Needledick" L. posting to me?

On Fri 20 Jun 2008 08:00:30a, sf told us...

> On Fri, 20 Jun 2008 00:09:57 -0700, "Bob Terwilliger"
> > wrote:
>
>>I think Jill has a guilty conscience in that respect. After all, how many
>>times has someone posted something like this:
>>
>>
>>"Does anybody have a recipe for ______?"
>>
>>and had Jill respond with:
>>
>>"Not me! I think _____ is disgusting!"
>>
>>
>>She has done that dozens if not hundreds of times, and what's the point?
>
> OK, name 5 specific times... I can't think of one.

Agreed. And what the hell is up with the "Jill bashing", be it every so
slight or not? I daresay there isn't a poster in this group that hasn't
made either an OT post or an inappropriate post or response at some time or
other. Some people make a career of it. Jill has been a longstanding
contributor to this group, and often offers suggestions, recipes, comments
on restaurants, etc.

We don't all have to like or get along with everyone else here, but the
best policy is to simply ignore those we dont.

--
Wayne Boatwright
-------------------------------------------
Friday, 06(VI)/20(XX)/08(MMVIII)
-------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------
You should learn to be assertive, but
not with me.
-------------------------------------------

On Fri 20 Jun 2008 06:11:41a, Michael "Dog3" told us...

> "cybercat" >
> : in rec.food.cooking
>
>>
>> I wish I could say that you are a funny, funny little man.
>>
>> You're just a tiresome little man with a major tiny dick complex.
>>
>> But please don't go. I am kind hearted and long to give you a chance
>> to redeem yourself.
>>
>> Really.
>
> I can smell you fear of Bob clear over here.
>
> Michael
>

Michael, it's not the smell of fear, it's just a an obnoxious smell that
pervades the group.

--
Wayne Boatwright
-------------------------------------------
Friday, 06(VI)/20(XX)/08(MMVIII)
-------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------
I'd love to, but my crayons all melted
together.
-------------------------------------------

On Fri, 20 Jun 2008 08:00:30 -0700, sf <.> wrote:

>On Fri, 20 Jun 2008 00:09:57 -0700, "Bob Terwilliger"
> wrote:
>
>>I think Jill has a guilty conscience in that respect. After all, how many
>>times has someone posted something like this:
>>
>>
>>"Does anybody have a recipe for ______?"
>>
>>and had Jill respond with:
>>
>>"Not me! I think _____ is disgusting!"
>>
>>
>>She has done that dozens if not hundreds of times, and what's the point?
>
>OK, name 5 specific times... I can't think of one.

maybe not specifically in response to recipe requests, but in
ingredient discussions she often chimes in with 'i never use that.
what would anyone use that? people who use that are stupid.'

remember the lengthy panko thread?

your pal,
blake

"Wayne Boatwright" schrieb :
> On Fri 20 Jun 2008 08:00:30a, sf told us...
>
>> On Fri, 20 Jun 2008 00:09:57 -0700, "Bob Terwilliger"
>> > wrote:
>>
>>>I think Jill has a guilty conscience in that respect. After all, how many
>>>times has someone posted something like this:
>>>
>>>
>>>"Does anybody have a recipe for ______?"
>>>
>>>and had Jill respond with:
>>>
>>>"Not me! I think _____ is disgusting!"
>>>
>>>
>>>She has done that dozens if not hundreds of times, and what's the point?
>>
>> OK, name 5 specific times... I can't think of one.
>
> Agreed. And what the hell is up with the "Jill bashing", be it every so
> slight or not? I daresay there isn't a poster in this group that hasn't
> made either an OT post or an inappropriate post or response at some time or
> other. Some people make a career of it. Jill has been a longstanding
> contributor to this group, and often offers suggestions, recipes, comments
> on restaurants, etc.
>
Yes, that's the way I see it, too.

> We don't all have to like or get along with everyone else here, but the
> best policy is to simply ignore those we dont.
>
Your suggestions violate several Usenet rules.
Your ISP has been contacted. (1)

Cheers,

Michael Kuettner

(1) for the humour-impaired : ;-)

On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 14:52:57 -0400, "kilikini"
> wrote:

>cybercat wrote:
>> <Samantha Lewis> wrote in message
>> ...
>>> On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 19:52:09 +0200, "Michael Kuettner"
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> <Samantha Lewis> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
>>>> ...
>>>>> Be sure to say the following:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Cthulhu, father of us all,
>>>>> This meal is a sign of Your undying hate for us:
>>>>> Devour us and drink our blood,
>>>>> And help us to give you glory each day
>>>>> Through your minions skinning us alive.
>>>>>
>>>> I fixed your post for you.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>
>>>> Michael Kuettner
>>>
>>> You are a bad person Michael. You will go to hell.
>>
>> Hell is where all the funnest people are.
>
>I think we'll all be in good company. :~)
>
>kili
>

i hope there are some restricted neighborhoods.

your pal,
blake

On Fri, 20 Jun 2008 16:18:50 GMT, blake murphy
> wrote:

>remember the lengthy panko thread?

I kill file threads that become redundant.


--
I never worry about diets. The only carrots that interest me are the number of carats in a diamond.

Mae West

On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 17:32:49 -0700 (PDT), The Ranger
> wrote:

>On Jun 19, 11:56 am, "Michael \"Dog3\"" > wrote:
>[major snippage]
>> Maybe I can have a martini when I get to hell
>
>It'd be a dirty -- or worse, V-O-D-K-A -- martini.
>
>The Ranger

with too much vermouth.

your pal,
blake

On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 18:47:52 GMT, "Michael \"Dog3\""
> wrote:

>Steve Wertz > newsi86ighqcsop
: in rec.food.cooking
>
>> On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 18:28:52 +0100, Samantha Lewis wrote:
>>
>>> Be sure to say the following:
>>>
>>>
>>> Father of us all,
>>> This meal is a sign of Your love for us:
>>> Bless us and bless our food,
>>> And help us to give you glory each day
>>> Through Jesus Christ our Lord.
>>
>> Mine goes, "Lets eat this shit before it gets cold.
>> All Hail Satan!"
>
>LOL... and at the end I might say "And Thank You Jesus for Doing the
>Dishes".
>
>Michael

my cousin used to favor

'god is great, god is good

yay GOD!!!'

your pal,
blake

On Fri 20 Jun 2008 09:18:57a, Michael Kuettner told us...

>
> "Wayne Boatwright" schrieb :
>> On Fri 20 Jun 2008 08:00:30a, sf told us...
>>
>>> On Fri, 20 Jun 2008 00:09:57 -0700, "Bob Terwilliger"
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>>I think Jill has a guilty conscience in that respect. After all, how
>>>>many times has someone posted something like this:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>"Does anybody have a recipe for ______?"
>>>>
>>>>and had Jill respond with:
>>>>
>>>>"Not me! I think _____ is disgusting!"
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>She has done that dozens if not hundreds of times, and what's the
>>>>point?
>>>
>>> OK, name 5 specific times... I can't think of one.
>>
>> Agreed. And what the hell is up with the "Jill bashing", be it every
>> so slight or not? I daresay there isn't a poster in this group that
>> hasn't made either an OT post or an inappropriate post or response at
>> some time or other. Some people make a career of it. Jill has been a
>> longstanding contributor to this group, and often offers suggestions,
>> recipes, comments on restaurants, etc.
>>
> Yes, that's the way I see it, too.
>
>> We don't all have to like or get along with everyone else here, but the
>> best policy is to simply ignore those we dont.
>>
> Your suggestions violate several Usenet rules.
> Your ISP has been contacted. (1)
>
> Cheers,
>
> Michael Kuettner
>
> (1) for the humour-impaired : ;-)

LOL!



--
Wayne Boatwright
-------------------------------------------
Friday, 06(VI)/20(XX)/08(MMVIII)
-------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------
Wakko of Borg: Heeeeeeellllllllo
Collective!
-------------------------------------------

On 2008-06-20, blake murphy > wrote:

> 'god is great, god is good

.....but would you want him living in your neighborhood?

There go the "goddammits", adultry, worshipping another idol (tv), etc.
Sounds pretty boring ....or being Amish.

nb

On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 11:57:54 -0700, "Dimitri" >
wrote:
>
>Better yet:


I can do it Lord, If You'll show to me,
the virtues of lettuce and celery.
If You'll teach me the evil of mayonnaise,
of pasta a la Milannaise
potatoes a la Lyonnaise
and crisp-fried chicken from the South.

Lord, if you love me, shut my mouth.

....a poem by victor buono. i've heard a recitation by him on the dr.
demento show.

your pal,
blake

On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 21:56:21 GMT, "graham" > wrote:

>
><Samantha Lewis> wrote in message
.. .
>> Be sure to say the following:
>>
>>
>> Father of us all,
>> This meal is a sign of Your love for us:
>> Bless us and bless our food,
>> And help us to give you glory each day
>> Through Jesus Christ our Lord.
>>
>> Amen!
>>
>What! and suffer eternal punishment from the noodly appendages of the Flying
>Spaghetti Monster? No thanks!!
>Graham
>

i thought the f.s.m. was pretty casual about whether you believed in
him or not. not like Some Others I Could Name.

your pal,
blake

On Jun 20, 9:47*am, blake murphy > wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 21:56:21 GMT, "graham" > wrote:
> >
> >What! and suffer eternal punishment from the noodly appendages of the Flying
> >Spaghetti Monster? *No thanks!!
> >Graham
>
> i thought the f.s.m. was pretty casual about whether you believed in
> him or not. *not like Some Others I Could Name.
>
We Pastafarians believe that we can justify our belief in the FSM
every bit as strongly as Samantha can justify her belief. The
difference is (among others) that we don't believe that those who
don't share our faith will go to hell. -aem

aem wrote:

> We Pastafarians believe that we can justify our belief in the FSM
> every bit as strongly as Samantha can justify her belief. The
> difference is (among others) that we don't believe that those who
> don't share our faith will go to hell.

But that's the fun part!

nancy

On Fri, 20 Jun 2008 16:18:50 GMT, blake murphy
> wrote:

>On Fri, 20 Jun 2008 08:00:30 -0700, sf <.> wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 20 Jun 2008 00:09:57 -0700, "Bob Terwilliger"
> wrote:
>>
>>>I think Jill has a guilty conscience in that respect. After all, how many
>>>times has someone posted something like this:
>>>
>>>
>>>"Does anybody have a recipe for ______?"
>>>
>>>and had Jill respond with:
>>>
>>>"Not me! I think _____ is disgusting!"
>>>
>>>
>>>She has done that dozens if not hundreds of times, and what's the point?
>>
>>OK, name 5 specific times... I can't think of one.
>
>maybe not specifically in response to recipe requests, but in
>ingredient discussions she often chimes in with 'i never use that.
>what would anyone use that? people who use that are stupid.'
>
>remember the lengthy panko thread?

Or any thread that involves children.

She's a twit, but much easier to deal with than someone like me.

Lou

Samantha wrote on Fri, 20 Jun 2008 01:52:59 +0100:

>> <Samantha Lewis> wrote in message
>> ...
>>> Be sure to say the following:
>>>
>>> Father of us all,
>>> This meal is a sign of Your love for us:
>>> Bless us and bless our food,
>>> And help us to give you glory each day
>>> Through Jesus Christ our Lord.
>>>
>>> Amen!
>>>
>> Whatever happened to:
>> God is Great
>> God is Good
>> And we thank Him
>> For our food.
>>
>> By His hand
>> We are fed
>> Give us Lord
>> Our daily bread.
>>
>> To the rest of you heathens, leave Samantha alone. If you
>> say grace, say it. If not, don't, all she did was suggest it
>> not push it off on you.

> Thank you Virginia.

It was a bit ingenuous (or possibly, disingenuous) to expose yourself to
the derision of the village atheists!
--

James Silverton
Potomac, Maryland

E-mail, with obvious alterations: not.jim.silverton.at.verizon.not

Samantha Lewis wrote:
> Be sure to say the following:
>
>
> Father of us all,
> This meal is a sign of Your love for us:
> Bless us and bless our food,
> And help us to give you glory each day
> Through Jesus Christ our Lord.
>
> Amen!

I was taught a grace to be said before breakfast.


Lord, make us not like the porridge,
Stodgy and thick.
Rather make us like the cornflakes
Crisp and ever ready to serve!


:-D

--
Enzo

I wear the cheese. It does not wear me.

In article >,
says...
> On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 18:47:52 GMT, "Michael \"Dog3\""
> > wrote:
>
> >Steve Wertz > newsi86ighqcsop
> : in rec.food.cooking
> >
> >> On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 18:28:52 +0100, Samantha Lewis wrote:
> >>
> >>> Be sure to say the following:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Father of us all,
> >>> This meal is a sign of Your love for us:
> >>> Bless us and bless our food,
> >>> And help us to give you glory each day
> >>> Through Jesus Christ our Lord.
> >>
> >> Mine goes, "Lets eat this shit before it gets cold.
> >> All Hail Satan!"
> >
> >LOL... and at the end I might say "And Thank You Jesus for Doing the
> >Dishes".
> >
> >Michael
>
> my cousin used to favor
>
> 'god is great, god is good
>
> yay GOD!!!'
>
> your pal,
> blake

It's funny, having such religious holy rollers in my family we never
said any type of prayers or invocations at family meals. In essence
"Food is ready" was about all it took.

No deity provided the food on the table, we did.

blake murphy wrote:



> maybe not specifically in response to recipe requests, but in
> ingredient discussions she often chimes in with 'i never use that.
> what would anyone use that? people who use that are stupid.'
>
> remember the lengthy panko thread?

She didn't say anything like that. She said, "I tried them, wasn't
impressed, don't know what the fuss is."




Brian

--
If televison's a babysitter, the Internet is a drunk librarian who
won't shut up.
-- Dorothy Gambrell (http://catandgirl.com)

Nancy Young wrote:
> aem wrote:
>
>> We Pastafarians believe that we can justify our belief in the FSM
>> every bit as strongly as Samantha can justify her belief. The
>> difference is (among others) that we don't believe that those who
>> don't share our faith will go to hell.
>
> But that's the fun part!
>
> nancy

ROTFLMAO! It is so nice to be home, again. I have laughed until I am in
tears.

Becca

"cybercat" > wrote in message
...
>
> "l, not -l" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>> On 19-Jun-2008, "jmcquown" > wrote:
>>
>>> >
>>> > I think Michael it pretty cool. Aren't you religious trolls not
>>> > supposed to judge?
>>> >
>>> Yep, that's what I love about all those "good Christians" - they're
>>> frequently judgemental, rude and always have to impose their beliefs on
>>> everyone else. They're the same folks who rail against things like
>>> drinking
>>> and (Baptists, at least) dancing (OMG! Dancing might lead to
>>> fornication!!).
>>> They're also the first to break their own rules when it's not Sunday.
>>>
>>> Jill
>>
>> With no one individual in mind as I write this; your statement about
>> "good
>> Christians" applies to many RFC contributors, Christian or not?
>>
>> "they're frequently judgemental, rude and always have to impose their
>> beliefs on everyone else."
>>
> Tooshayyyy!
>

Might I add an AMEN to that. Preach on Brother.....!!!!
-ginny

Becca wrote:
> Nancy Young wrote:
>> aem wrote:
>>
>>> We Pastafarians believe that we can justify our belief in the FSM
>>> every bit as strongly as Samantha can justify her belief. The
>>> difference is (among others) that we don't believe that those who
>>> don't share our faith will go to hell.
>>
>> But that's the fun part!

> ROTFLMAO! It is so nice to be home, again. I have laughed until I am
> in tears.

(laugh) There you are, I missed you!

nancy

"blake murphy" > wrote in message
...
> On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 11:57:54 -0700, "Dimitri" >
> wrote:
>>
>>Better yet:
>
>
> I can do it Lord, If You'll show to me,
> the virtues of lettuce and celery.
> If You'll teach me the evil of mayonnaise,
> of pasta a la Milannaise
> potatoes a la Lyonnaise
> and crisp-fried chicken from the South.
>
> Lord, if you love me, shut my mouth.
>
> ...a poem by victor buono. i've heard a recitation by him on the dr.
> demento show.
>
> your pal,
> blake


I saw him do it on the Johnny Carson Show too long ago.

He was doing a stint on the Batman TV show.

I can't remember his character King Tut ?????



--
Old Scoundrel

(AKA Dimitri)

Dimitri > wrote in message
...
>> I can do it Lord, If You'll show to me,
>> the virtues of lettuce and celery.
>> If You'll teach me the evil of mayonnaise,
>> of pasta a la Milannaise
>> potatoes a la Lyonnaise
>> and crisp-fried chicken from the South.
>>
>> Lord, if you love me, shut my mouth.
>>
>> ...a poem by victor buono. i've heard a recitation by
>> him on the dr. demento show.
>>
> I saw him do it on the Johnny Carson Show too long ago.
>
> He was doing a stint on the Batman TV show.
>
> I can't remember his character King Tut ?????

Yes. He was also a returning guest on Wild Wild West... Great
actor.
http://us.imdb.com/name/nm0120658/

The Ranger

Wayne quipped:

>> I can smell you fear of Bob clear over here.
>>
>
> Michael, it's not the smell of fear, it's just a an obnoxious smell that
> pervades the group.


I apologize to the group for allowing myself to be dragged to cybercat's
level.

It really reeks at that level: Either cybercat carries around a rotting
garbage-fed catfish, or that's cybercat's natural odor.


Bob

sf wrote:

>> I think Jill has a guilty conscience in that respect. After all, how many
>> times has someone posted something like this:
>>
>>
>> "Does anybody have a recipe for ______?"
>>
>> and had Jill respond with:
>>
>> "Not me! I think _____ is disgusting!"
>>
>>
>> She has done that dozens if not hundreds of times, and what's the point?
>
> OK, name 5 specific times... I can't think of one.


I think I'd rather just drop it. If I did bother to do the time-consuming
search required to prove my point, what would be gained?

Bob

On Fri, 20 Jun 2008 19:20:15 -0700, "Bob Terwilliger"
> wrote:

>Wayne quipped:
>
>>> I can smell you fear of Bob clear over here.
>>>
>>
>> Michael, it's not the smell of fear, it's just a an obnoxious smell that
>> pervades the group.
>
>
>I apologize to the group for allowing myself to be dragged to cybercat's
>level.
>
>It really reeks at that level: Either cybercat carries around a rotting
>garbage-fed catfish, or that's cybercat's natural odor.
>
Now you're stooping to Greg's level. Say something intelligent, don't
resort to name calling.


--
I never worry about diets. The only carrots that interest me are the number of carats in a diamond.

Mae West

On Fri, 20 Jun 2008 19:23:06 -0700, "Bob Terwilliger"
> wrote:

>I think I'd rather just drop it. If I did bother to do the time-consuming
>search required to prove my point, what would be gained?

Agreed. Drop it.


--
I never worry about diets. The only carrots that interest me are the number of carats in a diamond.

Mae West