On Jul 31, 3:24*pm, Lou Decruss > wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 14:48:38 -0500, "Gregory Morrow"
>
>
>
>
>
> > wrote:
> >To paraphrase President Reagan: *"There you go again, blake...".
>
> >Really, it's quite immature to paint "the opposition" in such black - and -
> >white terms, childish even. *You are *much* smarter than that I know, blake.
> >Use yer noggin, fer cryin' out loud...and grow up!
>
> >When Cyd Charisse died recently, I was discussing her with an acquaintance
> >(a die - hard Democrat) who immediately cut me off with, "But...but...she
> >was a REPUBLICAN!". *I guess the fact that she was a Republican negated all
> >her of her talent, the fact that she had a stable marriage of *60 years to
> >Tony Martin, that she raised a family, and that she was generally known as a
> >kind and generous person...
>
> ><oh well>
>
> >I *really* wonder how some of you "liberal" birds will channel your hatred
> >when the Shrub is no longer around...should the rest of us be scared, I
> >wonder...???
>
> I'm of the opinion that whoever the current president is has little to
> do with what's going on. *There's too many checks and balances. *And
> too many people don't see things as cyclical because of short term
> thinking. *Handouts are nice, but where is all the money going to come
> from? *Healthcare for all is only a deal for those who can't pay. *The
> burden will fall on those of us who can pay. *Sorry, but I pay enough
> already. *Until last year we were paying taxes in 3 different school
> districts and paying college tuitions. *Yet we were only able to claim
> one as a dependent. *How is that fair? *Rather than reward people who
> have children they can't afford they should be taxed. *The number of
> welfare babies would plummet. *
>
> Someone sent this to me a few days ago. *Although it's rather skewed
> it cracked me up:
>
> For those of you who slept through World History 101 here is a
> condensed version.
>
> Humans originally existed as members of small bands of nomadic
> hunters/gatherers. They lived on deer in the mountains during the
> summer and would go to the coast and live on fish and lobster in the
> winter.
>
> *The two most important events in all of history we
>
> *1. The invention of beer, and
> *2. The invention of the wheel. The wheel was invented to get man to
> the beer, and the beer to the man.
>
> These facts formed the foundation of modern civilization and together
> were the catalyst for the splitting of humanity into two distinct
> subgroups:
>
> 1. Liberals
> 2. Conservatives.
>
> *Once beer was discovered, it required grain and that was the
> beginning of agriculture. Neither the glass bottle nor aluminum can
> were invented yet, so while our early humans were sitting around
> waiting for them to be invented, they just stayed close to the
> brewery. That's how villages were formed.
>
> *Some men spent their days tracking and killing animals to BBQ at
> night while they were drinking beer. This was the beginning of what is
> known as the Conservative movement.
>
> Other men who were weaker and less skilled at hunting learned to live
> off the conservatives by showing up for the nightly BBQ's and doing
> the sewing, fetching, and hair dressing. This was the beginning of the
> Liberal movement.
>
> *Some of these liberal men eventually evolved into women. The rest
> became known as girlie-men.
>
> Some noteworthy liberal achievements include the domestication of
> cats, the invention of group therapy and group hugs, the evolution of
> the Hollywood actor, and the concept of Democratic voting to decide
> how to divide all the meat and beer that conservatives provided.
>
> Over the years, Conservatives came to be symbolized by the largest,
> most powerful land animal on earth, the elephant. Liberals are
> symbolized by the jackass.
>
> Modern liberals like imported beer (with lime added), but most prefer
> white wine or imported bottled water. They eat raw fish but like their
> beef well done. Sushi, tofu, and French food are standard liberal
> fare. *Another interesting evolutionary side note: most liberal women
> have higher testosterone levels than their men. Most social workers,
> personal injury attorneys, journalists, dreamers in Hollywood and
> group therapists are liberals.
>
> Conservatives drink domestic beer. They eat red meat and still provide
> for their women. Conservatives are big-game hunters, rodeo cowboys,
> firemen, lumberjacks, construction workers, medical doctors, police
> officers, corporate executives, athletes, golfers, and generally
> anyone who works productively. Conservatives who own companies hire
> other conservatives who want to work for a living.
>
> Liberals produce little or nothing. They like to govern the producers
> and decide what to do with the production. Liberals believe Europeans
> are more enlightened than Americans. That is why most of the liberals
> remained in Europe when conservatives were coming to America . They
> crept in after the Wild West was tamed and created a business of
> trying to get more for nothing.
>
> Here ends today's lesson in world history.
>
> It should be noted that a liberal may have a momentary urge to angrily
> respond to the above before forwarding it.
>
> A conservative will simply laugh and be so convinced of the absolute
> truth of this history that it will be forwarded immediately to other
> true believers..- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Nice- thanks for the laugh!

"Mike ............" > wrote in message
...
> Jerry Sauk said
>
> > Anybody that knows anything about the internet knows that unless the is
a
> > country in the address like alt.fast-food.UK...... then its a american
> > group.
>
> rec.food.cooking, for instance, isnt an american group, its just a group.
> If you want an exclusively US group, create one called american food or
> something.
> From the FAQ:-
> "The primary purpose of this document is to help cooks from different
> countries communicate with one another. The problem is that
> measurements and terms for food vary from country to country,
> even if both countries speak English. "
> --
> Mike .......
> Google-groups killfiled
> Remove clothing to email

Doesn't matter at all. Because it was STARTED in America. More power to
you if you want to discuss with other country's, but England politicol
issue's are OFF-TOPIC and extremely rude to be crossposted to alt.fast-food.

"Dave" > wrote in message
...
> Jerry Sauk wrote:
>
> > "sarah gray" > wrote in message
> > . 102...
> >
> >>"Jerry Sauk" > wrote in
> >>
> >>
> >>> BECAUSE I HAVE A REASON TO CROSS-POST. Everyone else is posting
> >>> off-topic
> >>>crap to irrelevent newsgroups. the purpose of MY cross-posting is to
> >>>inform other's that thier crossposting innappropriately, which is
> >>>acceptable.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>I am so using this as a .sig at some point.
> >>
> >>Saerah
> >
> >
> > Good Idea!!!! So am I!!!
>
> I hope you buy a dictionary first then.
>
> Dave

What the hell difference does it make if I have a dictionary what my sig is.

"Jerry Sauk" > ha scritto > What the hell difference
does it make if I have a dictionary what my sig is.

Mmm, well as an American I'd say it might be because the sentence is jammed
with misspellings and improper grammar?

"Giusi" > wrote in message
...
> "Jerry Sauk" > ha scritto > What the hell difference
> does it make if I have a dictionary what my sig is.
>
> Mmm, well as an American I'd say it might be because the sentence is
> jammed with misspellings and improper grammar?
>

Just like it's brain.

TFM®

On Sun, 10 Aug 2008 15:19:31 -0500, "Gregory Morrow"
> wrote:

>You ___DO___ know that this "Jerry Sauk" is one of Steve Wertz's
>"inventions, *don't* you, blake...??? I mean it's pretty common knowledge
>'n all...

Well, I didn't. Please publish his other pen names so we can all be
forewarned warned when he starts talking to himself.


--
I never worry about diets. The only carrots that interest me are the number of carats in a diamond.

Mae West

On Mon, 11 Aug 2008 16:54:40 +0100, "Mike ............"
> wrote:

>Jerry Sauk said
>
>> Anybody that knows anything about the internet knows that unless the is a
>> country in the address like alt.fast-food.UK...... then its a american
>> group.
>
>rec.food.cooking, for instance, isnt an american group, its just a group.

That's very true,

On Sun, 10 Aug 2008 22:22:22 -0500, "Jerry Sauk" >
wrote:

> BECAUSE I HAVE A REASON TO CROSS-POST. Everyone else is posting off-topic
>crap to irrelevent newsgroups. the purpose of MY cross-posting is to inform
>other's that thier crossposting innappropriately, which is acceptable.

What's off topic about McDonalds in these groups? It's food!

On Mon, 11 Aug 2008 11:55:18 +0100, Janet Baraclough
> wrote:

>The message >
>from Dave > contains these words:
>
>> Second is, if you can't be arsed to cut the cross posting, why should I
>> have to look at the crap that you post?
>
> Dave, by crossposting YOU are creating a very unwelcome nuisance on
>ukfd by continually dragging threads from other groups in here, and
>vice versa to other groups.
>
> This group was created to avoid irrelevant stuff from American groups.
>
> Janet.

Eh? What makes you think it's irrelevant? And what makes you think
they're American groups?

On Sun, 10 Aug 2008 22:39:11 -0500, Sqwertz >
wrote:

>Corey Richardson `R> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 10 Aug 2008 15:50:10 -0500, Sqwertz >
>> wrote:
>>
>>>Corey Richardson `R> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>You have me confused with somebody who would give you an answer.
>>>>
>>>> You just have!
>>>
>>>Uh, no I haven't.
>>
>> Eh, yes you did!
>>
>>>Definitely as Jerry Contender.
>>
>> I didn't understand. Could you run that by me one more time please?
>
>I'm convinced you can't be over 20 years old.

And what makes you think that?

>And you're not nearly
>as funny or entertaining as your think.
>
>-sw

OK.

On Mon, 11 Aug 2008 23:53:51 +0200, (Victor Sack)
wrote:

>Mike ............ > wrote:
>
>> you will also find many .com addresses are not based in the US. Probably by
>> thinking the world was the USA, the US has failed to reserve any area
>> exclusively for itself in NGs or web addresses.
>
>There is the us.* Usenet hierarchy and there is the .us TLD.
>
>Victor

So alt.* groups aren't just for Americans unlike what Janet says.

On Mon, 11 Aug 2008 12:40:59 -0500, Sqwertz >
wrote:

>Mike ............ wrote:
>> Jerry Sauk said
>>
>>> Anybody that knows anything about the internet knows that unless the is a
>>> country in the address like alt.fast-food.UK...... then its a american
>>> group.
>>
>> rec.food.cooking, for instance, isnt an american group, its just a group.
>> If you want an exclusively US group, create one called american food or
>> something.
>
>That group is called alt.food.barbecue.

Yes, that group appears to be very anti-British.

On Tue, 12 Aug 2008 02:10:36 -0500, "Jerry Sauk" >
wrote:

>
>"Mike ............" > wrote in message
. ..
>> Jerry Sauk said
>>
>> > Anybody that knows anything about the internet knows that unless the is
>a
>> > country in the address like alt.fast-food.UK...... then its a american
>> > group.
>>
>> rec.food.cooking, for instance, isnt an american group, its just a group.
>> If you want an exclusively US group, create one called american food or
>> something.
>> From the FAQ:-
>> "The primary purpose of this document is to help cooks from different
>> countries communicate with one another. The problem is that
>> measurements and terms for food vary from country to country,
>> even if both countries speak English. "
>> --
>> Mike .......
>> Google-groups killfiled
>> Remove clothing to email
>
>Doesn't matter at all. Because it was STARTED in America. More power to
>you if you want to discuss with other country's, but England politicol
>issue's are OFF-TOPIC and extremely rude to be crossposted to alt.fast-food.

Aren't you just being silly now?

On Tue, 12 Aug 2008 10:30:37 +0200, "Giusi" >
wrote:

>"Jerry Sauk" > ha scritto > What the hell difference
>does it make if I have a dictionary what my sig is.
>
>Mmm, well as an American I'd say it might be because the sentence is jammed
>with misspellings and improper grammar?

Does it really matter as long as you can understand it?

<sf> wrote:

> On Sun, 10 Aug 2008 15:19:31 -0500, "Gregory Morrow"
> > wrote:
>
> >You ___DO___ know that this "Jerry Sauk" is one of Steve Wertz's
> >"inventions, *don't* you, blake...??? I mean it's pretty common
knowledge
> >'n all...
>
> Well, I didn't. Please publish his other pen names so we can all be
> forewarned warned when he starts talking to himself.


Okay, here they a

- Jenny Sauk

- Buffy Lyer

- Cornholio

- He was also that "Grandma" person that posted her on rfc a little whiles
back


HTH ---> HAND


--
Best
Greg

On Tue, 12 Aug 2008 12:51:07 -0500, "Gregory Morrow"
> wrote:

>
><sf> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 10 Aug 2008 15:19:31 -0500, "Gregory Morrow"
>> > wrote:
>>
>> >You ___DO___ know that this "Jerry Sauk" is one of Steve Wertz's
>> >"inventions, *don't* you, blake...??? I mean it's pretty common
>knowledge
>> >'n all...
>>
>> Well, I didn't. Please publish his other pen names so we can all be
>> forewarned warned when he starts talking to himself.
>
>
>Okay, here they a
>
>- Jenny Sauk
>
>- Buffy Lyer
>
>- Cornholio
>
>- He was also that "Grandma" person that posted her on rfc a little whiles
>back
>
>
>HTH ---> HAND

Thanks! Not sure who Cornholio is.... a fast food personality?
However, there are lots of "lurkers" here who suddenly break their
silence that I'm sure an rfc regular (or two) are behind.



--
I never worry about diets. The only carrots that interest me are the number of carats in a diamond.

Mae West

<sf> wrote
>>HTH ---> HAND
>
> Thanks! Not sure who Cornholio is.... a fast food personality?
> However, there are lots of "lurkers" here who suddenly break their
> silence that I'm sure an rfc regular (or two) are behind.
>

Um. SF? This is the genius who insisted I was about five other posters, and
still does from time to time. Damned near as smart as Sarah that way.

When you start seeing sockpuppets--or caring too much about who might
be--it's a clear sign that it might be time to back away from the computer
for a while.

On Tue, 12 Aug 2008 14:08:16 -0400, "cybercat" >
wrote:

>When you start seeing sockpuppets--or caring too much about who might
>be--it's a clear sign that it might be time to back away from the computer
>for a while.

You didn't notice I've cut back?


--
I never worry about diets. The only carrots that interest me are the number of carats in a diamond.

Mae West

<sf> wrote:

> On Tue, 12 Aug 2008 14:08:16 -0400, "cybercat" >
> wrote:
>
> >When you start seeing sockpuppets--or caring too much about who might
> >be--it's a clear sign that it might be time to back away from the
computer
> >for a while.
>
> You didn't notice I've cut back?


cyber's simply seeking to slander me via her response to you, lol...

She dare not respond directly to my posts 'cos she *knows* she'll get
*creamed*...

;-p


--
Best
Greg

Gregory Morrow wrote:

> Okay, here they a
>
> - Jenny Sauk
>
> - Buffy Lyer
>
> - Cornholio
>
> - He was also that "Grandma" person that posted her on rfc a little whiles
> back
>
>
> HTH ---> HAND

Gosh, I thought Grandma was real. There are not enough nudists
around here.

Becca

"Corey Richardson" > wrote in message
...
> On Mon, 11 Aug 2008 12:40:59 -0500, Sqwertz >
> wrote:
>
>>Mike ............ wrote:
>>> Jerry Sauk said
>>>
>>>> Anybody that knows anything about the internet knows that unless the is
>>>> a
>>>> country in the address like alt.fast-food.UK...... then its a american
>>>> group.
>>>
>>> rec.food.cooking, for instance, isnt an american group, its just a
>>> group.
>>> If you want an exclusively US group, create one called american food or
>>> something.
>>
>>That group is called alt.food.barbecue.
>
> Yes, that group appears to be very anti-British.

Basically, they're anti-dumb ass. If the shoe fits...
>

"Corey Richardson" > wrote in message
news
> On Sun, 10 Aug 2008 22:22:22 -0500, "Jerry Sauk" >
> wrote:
>
> > BECAUSE I HAVE A REASON TO CROSS-POST. Everyone else is posting
off-topic
> >crap to irrelevent newsgroups. the purpose of MY cross-posting is to
inform
> >other's that thier crossposting innappropriately, which is acceptable.
>
> What's off topic about McDonalds in these groups? It's food!

Not a damn thing! I was reffering to the other discussion's about politics,
religion, and cooking food at home, and British words/ American word's, all
of which are topic's that have limited interest and are WAY off-base for a
fast-food group's.

"Giusi" > wrote in message
...
> "Jerry Sauk" > ha scritto > What the hell difference
> does it make if I have a dictionary what my sig is.
>
> Mmm, well as an American I'd say it might be because the sentence is
jammed
> with misspellings and improper grammar?
>
>

So ****ing what? It doesn't matter as long as people can understand it.
The topic is CLOSED.

"Corey Richardson" > wrote in message
...
> On Tue, 12 Aug 2008 02:10:36 -0500, "Jerry Sauk" >
> wrote:
>
> >
> >"Mike ............" > wrote in message
> . ..
> >> Jerry Sauk said
> >>
> >> > Anybody that knows anything about the internet knows that unless the
is
> >a
> >> > country in the address like alt.fast-food.UK...... then its a
american
> >> > group.
> >>
> >> rec.food.cooking, for instance, isnt an american group, its just a
group.
> >> If you want an exclusively US group, create one called american food or
> >> something.
> >> From the FAQ:-
> >> "The primary purpose of this document is to help cooks from different
> >> countries communicate with one another. The problem is that
> >> measurements and terms for food vary from country to country,
> >> even if both countries speak English. "
> >> --
> >> Mike .......
> >> Google-groups killfiled
> >> Remove clothing to email
> >
> >Doesn't matter at all. Because it was STARTED in America. More power to
> >you if you want to discuss with other country's, but England politicol
> >issue's are OFF-TOPIC and extremely rude to be crossposted to
alt.fast-food.
>
> Aren't you just being silly now?

Hell no. YOU TELL ME Corey why would UK polital issue's be of ANY interest
to your average American Fast-Food Fan.

On Mon, 11 Aug 2008 08:45:32 -0500, Sqwertz wrote:

> (Book of Saukrates)

Is that the famous ancient German philosopher and mathematician?

Jerry Sauk wrote:

> Hell no. YOU TELL ME Corey why would UK polital issue's be of ANY interest
> to your average American Fast-Food Fan.

Grilled hamburger anyone?

http://rbwproductions.googlepages.co...0201-large.jpg

Jenny will of course have no clue WTF this picture represents.

-sw

"Sqwertz" > wrote in message
...
> Jerry Sauk wrote:
>
>> Hell no. YOU TELL ME Corey why would UK polital issue's be of ANY
>> interest
>> to your average American Fast-Food Fan.
>
> Grilled hamburger anyone?
>
> http://rbwproductions.googlepages.co...0201-large.jpg
>
> Jenny will of course have no clue WTF this picture represents.
>
> -sw

He's on dialup, dammit! He doesn't have time to click on links.

TFM®

On Wed, 13 Aug 2008 03:10:01 -0500, Jerry Sauk wrote:

> "Corey Richardson" > wrote in message
> news
>> On Sun, 10 Aug 2008 22:22:22 -0500, "Jerry Sauk" >
>> wrote:
>>
>>> BECAUSE I HAVE A REASON TO CROSS-POST. Everyone else is posting
> off-topic
>>>crap to irrelevent newsgroups. the purpose of MY cross-posting is to
> inform
>>>other's that thier crossposting innappropriately, which is acceptable.
>>
>> What's off topic about McDonalds in these groups? It's food!
>
> Not a damn thing! I was reffering to the other discussion's about politics,
> religion, and cooking food at home, and British words/ American word's, all
> of which are topic's that have limited interest and are WAY off-base for a
> fast-food group's.

have someone explain to you what 'cross-posting' is, you ****ing ignoramus.

blake

On Tue, 12 Aug 2008 14:08:16 -0400, cybercat wrote:

> <sf> wrote
>>>HTH ---> HAND
>>
>> Thanks! Not sure who Cornholio is.... a fast food personality?
>> However, there are lots of "lurkers" here who suddenly break their
>> silence that I'm sure an rfc regular (or two) are behind.
>>
>
> Um. SF? This is the genius who insisted I was about five other posters, and
> still does from time to time. Damned near as smart as Sarah that way.
>
> When you start seeing sockpuppets--or caring too much about who might
> be--it's a clear sign that it might be time to back away from the computer
> for a while.

if jerry is an invention by steve, it's an ingenious one. no one with an
ounce of sense can impersonate a complete idiot successfully.

now, jerry being a forgery by greg i could completely buy.

your pal,
blake

your pal,
blake

On Wed, 13 Aug 2008 03:11:14 -0500, Jerry Sauk wrote:

> "Giusi" > wrote in message
> ...
>> "Jerry Sauk" > ha scritto > What the hell difference
>> does it make if I have a dictionary what my sig is.
>>
>> Mmm, well as an American I'd say it might be because the sentence is
> jammed
>> with misspellings and improper grammar?
>>
>>
>
> So ****ing what? It doesn't matter as long as people can understand it.
> The topic is CLOSED.

thus spake zarathustra.

blake

"blake murphy" > wrote in message
.. .
> On Wed, 13 Aug 2008 03:10:01 -0500, Jerry Sauk wrote:
>
> > "Corey Richardson" > wrote in message
> > news
> >> On Sun, 10 Aug 2008 22:22:22 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> BECAUSE I HAVE A REASON TO CROSS-POST. Everyone else is posting
> > off-topic
> >>>crap to irrelevent newsgroups. the purpose of MY cross-posting is to
> > inform
> >>>other's that thier crossposting innappropriately, which is acceptable.
> >>
> >> What's off topic about McDonalds in these groups? It's food!
> >
> > Not a damn thing! I was reffering to the other discussion's about
politics,
> > religion, and cooking food at home, and British words/ American word's,
all
> > of which are topic's that have limited interest and are WAY off-base for
a
> > fast-food group's.
>
> have someone explain to you what 'cross-posting' is, you ****ing
ignoramus.
>
> blake

I already KNOW what it is, dipwad. WHY do you think I've been complaining
about it for the last few days!!!!

And it seems to have gotten better lately, so thank you.

blake murphy wrote:

> On Tue, 12 Aug 2008 14:08:16 -0400, cybercat wrote:
>
> > <sf> wrote
> >>>HTH ---> HAND
> >>
> >> Thanks! Not sure who Cornholio is.... a fast food personality?
> >> However, there are lots of "lurkers" here who suddenly break their
> >> silence that I'm sure an rfc regular (or two) are behind.
> >>
> >
> > Um. SF? This is the genius who insisted I was about five other posters,
and
> > still does from time to time. Damned near as smart as Sarah that way.
> >
> > When you start seeing sockpuppets--or caring too much about who might
> > be--it's a clear sign that it might be time to back away from the
computer
> > for a while.
>
> if jerry is an invention by steve, it's an ingenious one. no one with an
> ounce of sense can impersonate a complete idiot successfully.
>


Steve is *well - known* for goofing around, blake...or are you simply a
*total* noob...???


> now, jerry being a forgery by greg i could completely buy.
>


Except that it I am not the*least* bit interested in the topic of fast food,
until Steve's "Jerry Sauk" persona erupted I was not even aware of that
group. I might as well go piddle around with a fake identity in a yachting
or ceramic engineering group...meaning N- O - T ...

And blake, STOP trying to top the cyberpussie in the "smarm" department,
you'll simply never measure "up" to her level, boy...

<chuckle>


--
Best
Greg

blake murphy > wrote:

> if jerry is an invention by steve, it's an ingenious one. no one with an
> ounce of sense can impersonate a complete idiot successfully.

I wish I could take credit for this Jerry character - it would have
been the ultimate troll.

But we all know Jerry is for real. Most of us have email from him,
and the headers verify that he is indeed an idiot living in Green
Bay, WI. I've even exchanged email with his brothers (who also
think he's an idiot).

> now, jerry being a forgery by greg i could completely buy.

I havent' met anybody on Usenet that could pull of a fake such as
Jerry.

-sw

cybercat > wrote:

> <sf> wrote
>>>HTH ---> HAND
>>
>> Thanks! Not sure who Cornholio is.... a fast food personality?
>> However, there are lots of "lurkers" here who suddenly break their
>> silence that I'm sure an rfc regular (or two) are behind.
>>
>
> Um. SF? This is the genius who insisted I was about five other posters, and
> still does from time to time. Damned near as smart as Sarah that way.

You referring to me or Greg? I've accused of being ~*patches*~ in
the past, but that was mostly in jest. And a long time since I've
called you that.

-sw

"Jerry Sauk" > ha scritto nel messaggio
m...
>
> "Giusi" > wrote in message
> ...
>> "Jerry Sauk" > ha scritto > What the hell
>> difference
>> does it make if I have a dictionary what my sig is.
>>
>> Mmm, well as an American I'd say it might be because the sentence is
> jammed
>> with misspellings and improper grammar?
>>
>>
>
> So ****ing what? It doesn't matter as long as people can understand it.
> The topic is CLOSED.

Not as long as you continue to ceoss post your ravings onto ukfd. You don't
moderate us.
>
>

"Giusi" > wrote in message
...
> "Jerry Sauk" > ha scritto nel messaggio
> m...
> >
> > "Giusi" > wrote in message
> > ...
> >> "Jerry Sauk" > ha scritto > What the hell
> >> difference
> >> does it make if I have a dictionary what my sig is.
> >>
> >> Mmm, well as an American I'd say it might be because the sentence is
> > jammed
> >> with misspellings and improper grammar?
> >>
> >>
> >
> > So ****ing what? It doesn't matter as long as people can understand it.
> > The topic is CLOSED.
>
> Not as long as you continue to ceoss post your ravings onto ukfd. You
don't
> moderate us.
> >
> >

I'm not the one doing the cross-posting, dumbass!!!! If you look REAL
CAREFUL at the original poster's name, it was COREY that cross-posted!!!
And another ting, I don't recall ever "moderating" you!! I've never been to
your NG, I really don't care what goes on in there as long as you DONT
CROSS-POST OFF-TOPIC BRITISH STUFF TO MINE!!!!!

On Wed, 13 Aug 2008 20:30:03 -0500, Sqwertz wrote:

> blake murphy > wrote:
>
>> if jerry is an invention by steve, it's an ingenious one. no one with an
>> ounce of sense can impersonate a complete idiot successfully.
>
> I wish I could take credit for this Jerry character - it would have
> been the ultimate troll.
>
> But we all know Jerry is for real. Most of us have email from him,
> and the headers verify that he is indeed an idiot living in Green
> Bay, WI. I've even exchanged email with his brothers (who also
> think he's an idiot).

<snort>
>
>> now, jerry being a forgery by greg i could completely buy.
>
> I havent' met anybody on Usenet that could pull of a fake such as
> Jerry.
>
> -sw

it would be extremely difficult. plus, most people who write a satirical
post (as opposed to pure trollery) leave some clue that they are joking.
this guy is just stupid.

your pal,
blake