"cybercat" > wrote in
:

<snip>

> This of course must mean that I am green with envy and that I cannot
> go and drop $500 at an insipidly average retail store. I bet everyone
> who gags at Terry Pulliam Byrd's "Aren't I just the cutest thing in a
> middle-aged skin

So a middle-aged woman is supposed to have the skin of a teenager? I
don't get it.

> and a _______ suit you have ever seen" posts are just
> the same. Green with envy, in a much lower economic bracket, and much
> less educated than a *choke* paralegal.
>

I would be willing to bet that I make less than most of the people who
post in here, and it's likely that I have less formal education.

Why is it that Terry's posts of a 'consumer' nature don't *bother* me?
Perhaps it is because she is a useful and humorous contributor to the
group, and it is clear that she is not the stuck-up snob you make her
out to be. I will admit to reading the original post and feeling twinges
of jealousy, but I'd never take my dissatisfaction with my income
bracket out on someone more fortunate. Certainly not someone who, though
I have never met her, seems to be quite a nice person. The fact that you
are clearly jealous of the fact that she can afford nice things for
herself is no excuse for you to act like such an asshat.

oh, and this is just for you:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/64129172@N00/2752316806/

Saerah

Saerah

On Mon 11 Aug 2008 05:46:06a, sarah gray told us...

> "cybercat" > wrote in
> :
>
> <snip>
>
>> This of course must mean that I am green with envy and that I cannot
>> go and drop $500 at an insipidly average retail store. I bet everyone
>> who gags at Terry Pulliam Byrd's "Aren't I just the cutest thing in a
>> middle-aged skin
>
> So a middle-aged woman is supposed to have the skin of a teenager? I
> don't get it.
>
>> and a _______ suit you have ever seen" posts are just
>> the same. Green with envy, in a much lower economic bracket, and much
>> less educated than a *choke* paralegal.
>>
>
> I would be willing to bet that I make less than most of the people who
> post in here, and it's likely that I have less formal education.
>
> Why is it that Terry's posts of a 'consumer' nature don't *bother* me?
> Perhaps it is because she is a useful and humorous contributor to the
> group, and it is clear that she is not the stuck-up snob you make her
> out to be. I will admit to reading the original post and feeling twinges
> of jealousy, but I'd never take my dissatisfaction with my income
> bracket out on someone more fortunate. Certainly not someone who, though
> I have never met her, seems to be quite a nice person. The fact that you
> are clearly jealous of the fact that she can afford nice things for
> herself is no excuse for you to act like such an asshat.
>
> oh, and this is just for you:
>
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/64129172@N00/2752316806/
>
> Saerah
>
> Saerah
>

Well said, Saerah!

--
Date: Monday, 08(VIII)/11(XI)/08(MMVIII)

*******************************************
Countdown till Labor Day
2wks 6dys 18hrs 8mins
*******************************************
Confucius say: Man who abuse his
computer get bad bytes!
*******************************************

cybercat wrote:

> "Christine Dabney" > wrote in message
> news
> > On Sun, 10 Aug 2008 08:37:38 -0700 (PDT), maxine in ri
> > > wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Everyone has their breakpoint of what they consider fun spending,
> >>(whether it's $1 for an item at a yard sale or flea market, or
> >>$1000 for some bauble that you or I would find absurd)
> >
> > Yeah...like I must spend hundreds of $$$ on cookbooks. And kitchen
> > equipment, gadgets, cookware....you name it...
> >
> > If I can get it cheaper, I do...but I like quality....so in many cases
> > I am willing to spend the bigger bucks. And if you put the two
> > together (like Surfas) I can go really nuts.
>
> Do you spend more than you need to for anything, perhaps much more, then
> think it is just adorable to broadcast it?
>
> One of you miserable cut-outs should have let your good buddy Terry know
how
> disgusting these posts really are.
>
> I'll take the credit for doing it. I live to serve.


If you lob enuf adolescent insults per day does it activate your G -
Spot...???


--
Best
Greg

On Mon, 11 Aug 2008 03:14:38 -0400, "cybercat" >
fired up random neurons and synapses to opine:

>Good for you. None of the above changes my original objection to the post
>she made that started this thread. Bad content, bad form, and those of you
>who have not let her know that her "gosh aren't I cute" posts of this nature
>are not at all cute have done her a great disservice.
>
>You don't get that it matters not how much money she has or does not have.
>It's her constant display of her insipid values that disgusts me.
>
>I think less of you now as well. I clearly gave you a lot more credit than
>you were due for years. Ugh.
>
I was going to include Christine's post, but decided not to do so, as
you are clearly obsessing with my original post, which was meant to be
self-deprecating and far from "gosh aren't I cute." The point of the
original post no longer has any bearing on your multiplicity of posts
in response that clearly show your vicious nature.

I will no longer reply to your posts, as I will no longer see
them.Your value to the newsgroup is nil and I fail to see any posts
that are actually OT or that are worthy of reading.

Cheerio, aulde bean,
Terry "Squeaks" Pulliam Burd
--
"If the soup had been as hot as the claret, if the claret had been as
old as the bird, and if the bird's breasts had been as full as the
waitress's, it would have been a very good dinner."

-- Duncan Hines

To reply, replace "meatloaf" with "cox"