Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "James" > wrote in message ... > Can you believe this? > > http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/3441255.stm That has been around for years. Notice the date on the article is 2004. Just don't over heat the pan and it is OK. It is also possible to kill birds by overheating and burning food or oil in regular pans too. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
James wrote:
> Can you believe this? > > http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/3441255.stm Nothing new but a good reminder for bird owners. Birds are sensitive to many different things. They used to use small birds in cages as gas detectors in mines. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2008-08-12, James > wrote:
> Can you believe this? Ancient history. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2008-08-12, George > wrote:
> Nothing new but a good reminder for bird owners. Birds are sensitive to > many different things. They used to use small birds in cages as gas > detectors in mines. Yes, very good mortgage payment detectors. If the parakeet is dead, chances are good the mortgage payment is iffy, this month. nb |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "James" > wrote in message ... > Can you believe this? > > http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/3441255.stm Of course the picture is that of a parakeet. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 12, 8:38 am, Janet Baraclough >
wrote: > The message > > from notbob > contains these words: > > > On 2008-08-12, James > wrote: > > > Can you believe this? > > Ancient history. > > I can easily believe it; birds are much more susceptible than humans > to poor air quality. Canaries were taken down mines as gas detectors. > I accidentally killed mine when I varnished a floor in the next room; > the fumes wiped them out. > > Janet I don't mean to offend anyone but the word "accident" reminds me of what happened to my sister's cockatiel, the second one she got . The first one (a she) was so easy going that all of us just assumed that he was just insecure. Reagradles sof how long he has bene with us. He would act so scared if we put some thing near him on the side when he is facing the other direction. He would act angry and act as if I was after it. It was abut annoying and we just assumed that it was being unresonable. They were not kept in the cage except when sleeping. (My sister treated them like humans.) In time, my sister made a little nest for the first one on the top of the big bookcase in the living room. That one likes the dark when she wants to rest/sleep. The second one was beginning to covet that spot and so my sister mad eone for him but one night, he was till going after the first one, who I think my sister said was pregnant and needed her energy and rest, etc. and so my sister took the second one upstairs and put him in a room, the room he is not used to, and as she closed the door, she *accidentally* then the switch off. (She intend to leave the light on, she said.) She heard a big *thud* and didn't think much about it but when she didn't hear any sound from that room, she went and checked. There it was injured and unable to move. What happened was that it got panicked when the light was turned off and flew in panic toward the window where there was some light form the street and hit the window hard, injuring in the head. He spent the night with my sister unable to move and died the next day. form internal bleeding. Laster, my sister did some reading and learned that blindness common in this specie and obviously that one was blind in one eye and hence was always scared when he noticed someone on that side of eyes. It got panicked with little vision and flew hard to its death. What I never told my sister was that she was utterly irresponsible to not read up about the species before getting them as pets. All his life, since a baby, it lived in fear and died in such a miserable way with internal head injury. .. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 11, 6:09 pm, James > wrote:
> Can you believe this? > > http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/3441255.stm Does that mean we should not use any non-stick pan? |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
amandaF > wrote:
>Does that mean we should not use any non-stick pan? I don't use any non-stick pans. Possibly toxicity is one reason. Steve |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Steve Pope > wrote:
> amandaF > wrote: > > > Does that mean we should not use any non-stick pan? > > I don't use any non-stick pans. Possibly toxicity is one reason. > > Steve It merely means one should exercise caution and not heat a pan with non-stick coating (especially not an empty one) to the point of being smoking hot. I've had birds pretty much all my life and never had a problem with my cookware killing them (or me). Jill |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
jmcquown > wrote:
>Steve Pope > wrote: >> amandaF > wrote: >> > Does that mean we should not use any non-stick pan? >> I don't use any non-stick pans. Possibly toxicity is one reason. >It merely means one should exercise caution and not heat a pan with >non-stick coating (especially not an empty one) to the point of being >smoking hot. That would make sense, if there were actually enough advantages of these non-stick plastic coatings to offset the potential toxicity if you're not careful enough. Also, even if you don't vaporize and inhale the plastic, some of it will inevitably get abraded and ingested, so being careful heating it might not be good enough. Steve |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Steve Pope wrote:
> jmcquown > wrote: > > >Steve Pope > wrote: > > >> amandaF > wrote: > > >> > Does that mean we should not use any non-stick pan? > > >> I don't use any non-stick pans. Possibly toxicity is one reason. > > > It merely means one should exercise caution and not heat a pan with > > non-stick coating (especially not an empty one) to the point of > > being smoking hot. > > That would make sense, if there were actually enough advantages of > these non-stick plastic coatings to offset the potential toxicity > if you're not careful enough. There are many advantages, at least to me. You might not find that to be so. > Also, even if you don't vaporize and inhale the plastic, some of > it will inevitably get abraded and ingested, so being careful > heating it might not be good enough. There is no evidence that such a thing is hazardous. Brian -- If televison's a babysitter, the Internet is a drunk librarian who won't shut up. -- Dorothy Gambrell (http://catandgirl.com) |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Default User > wrote:
>Steve Pope wrote: >> That would make sense, if there were actually enough advantages of >> these non-stick plastic coatings to offset the potential toxicity >> if you're not careful enough. >There are many advantages, at least to me. You might not find that to >be so. Yeah, I find few if any advantages to non-stick coated cookwear, and lots of disadvantages relative to the pieces I normally use. >> Also, even if you don't vaporize and inhale the plastic, some of >> it will inevitably get abraded and ingested, so being careful >> heating it might not be good enough. >There is no evidence that such a thing is hazardous. Some of us don't like to ingest plastic even if it isn't proven to be hazardous. Steve |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 12 Aug 2008 15:19:06 GMT, notbob wrote:
> On 2008-08-12, James > wrote: >> Can you believe this? > > Ancient history. oh, yeah? how come my bird is still dead? your pal, blake |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "blake murphy" > wrote in message ... > On Tue, 12 Aug 2008 15:19:06 GMT, notbob wrote: > >> On 2008-08-12, James > wrote: >>> Can you believe this? >> >> Ancient history. > > oh, yeah? how come my bird is still dead? > > your pal, > blake Shhh it was dead when you bought it. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4vuW6tQ0218 Dimitri |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "blake murphy" > wrote in message ... > On Tue, 12 Aug 2008 15:19:06 GMT, notbob wrote: > >> On 2008-08-12, James > wrote: >>> Can you believe this? >> >> Ancient history. > > oh, yeah? how come my bird is still dead? > Oh, honey. I will get you a new bird. How bout a mocking bird? |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
blake murphy wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Aug 2008 15:19:06 GMT, notbob wrote: > >> On 2008-08-12, James > wrote: >>> Can you believe this? >> >> Ancient history. > > oh, yeah? how come my bird is still dead? LOLOL |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 13 Aug 2008 10:51:40 -0700, Dimitri wrote:
> "blake murphy" > wrote in message > ... >> On Tue, 12 Aug 2008 15:19:06 GMT, notbob wrote: >> >>> On 2008-08-12, James > wrote: >>>> Can you believe this? >>> >>> Ancient history. >> >> oh, yeah? how come my bird is still dead? >> >> your pal, >> blake > > Shhh it was dead when you bought it. > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4vuW6tQ0218 > > Dimitri i *thought* he looked kinda funny. your pal, blake |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 13 Aug 2008 14:16:46 -0400, cybercat wrote:
> "blake murphy" > wrote in message > ... >> On Tue, 12 Aug 2008 15:19:06 GMT, notbob wrote: >> >>> On 2008-08-12, James > wrote: >>>> Can you believe this? >>> >>> Ancient history. >> >> oh, yeah? how come my bird is still dead? >> > Oh, honey. I will get you a new bird. How bout a mocking bird? what if he turns brass? your pal, blake |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
frying will kill botulism ? | General Cooking | |||
Winter kill | Winemaking | |||
Kill files | Wine | |||
Don't run. It will kill you. | General Cooking |