Corey Richardson wrote:
> [also sent via e-mail to those whom may be concerned]
>
> Actually, having just thought about the situation, and considering the
> forgeries, it's probably best if you *don't* post here that you've
> e-mailed me! I'll return an e-mail to you all as *soon* as I can.
>
> Thank you!

ROFLMAOOO

--
Real friendship is shown in times of trouble;
prosperity is full of friends.
* Euripedes

"Ophelia" > wrote in message
...
> Corey Richardson wrote:
>> It's now obvious that Steve's true "nature" is already general
>> knowledge in these groups, so I apologise for reiterating it.
>
> And we still like him more than you.
>
> --
> Real friendship is shown in times of trouble;
> prosperity is full of friends.

I like this signature.

"Ophelia" > wrote in news:g8tnhm$eli$1
@registered.motzarella.org:

> Corey Richardson wrote:
>> It's now obvious that Steve's true "nature" is already general
>> knowledge in these groups, so I apologise for reiterating it.
>
> And we still like him more than you.
>

That speaks volumes

--
Saerah

"Welcome to Usenet, Biatch! Adapt or haul ass!"
- some hillbilly from FL

cybercat wrote:
> "Ophelia" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Corey Richardson wrote:
>>> It's now obvious that Steve's true "nature" is already general
>>> knowledge in these groups, so I apologise for reiterating it.
>>
>> And we still like him more than you.
>>
>> --
>> Real friendship is shown in times of trouble;
>> prosperity is full of friends.
>
> I like this signature.


As so I Euripedes had insight

--
Real friendship is shown in times of trouble;
prosperity is full of friends.
* Euripedes

Corey Richardson wrote:

> LOL! You think it's a joke when scum like Steve (Sqwertz) forge you and
> then whine via inappropriate cross-posting to other newsgroups?
>
Yes.

--
Albert Worschey

Corey Richardson wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Aug 2008 19:35:16 -0400, "Edwin Pawlowski" >
> wrote:
>
>> "Corey Richardson" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> Could the people here who've e-mailed me please let me know that they
>>> have done so in one of these groups in future, please? I tend to miss
>>> them for hours if you don't!
>>>
>>> I've now just replied to those who mailed me, thanks!
>>>
>>>
>> Just because you're too lazy to check your inbox the rest of the people
>> should clutter this group?
>
> I informed those people who had e-mailed me that I sometimes take a
> while to check my inbox and that a quick "heads-up" in these groups
> would be beneficial to ensure a swift reply.
>
> I did that in one post. It's hardly clutter...
>
Mr Richardson! Sorry to bother you here, I emailed you late last week
and I don't know if you got it but can I have your autograph?

--
Albert Worschey

On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 14:03:24 -0400, Albert Worschey
> wrote:

>Corey Richardson wrote:
>
>> LOL! You think it's a joke when scum like Steve (Sqwertz) forge you and
>> then whine via inappropriate cross-posting to other newsgroups?
>>
>Yes.

Will you still find it a joke when Steve (Sqwertz) does it to you?

On Sun, 24 Aug 2008 21:46:45 -0500, Sqwertz >
wrote:

>Corey Richardson > wrote:
>
>> I don't have the time and energy to forge people over many groups also.
>
>If you saw how many posts I made using your name, and to what
>groups, and what the content of those messages were

Decent people can tell your trash forgeries.

>How long are you going to go on about this?

As long as you do it.

>Your next feat will be to stalk me into all my usual groups and
>repeat all this stuff

Good idea. Then they can see what scum you are too!

On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 17:33:57 GMT, "Michael \"Dog3\"" >
wrote:

>saerah gray > news:Xns9B04C841A9BA6anisaerahoohaycom@
>207.115.33.102: in rec.food.cooking
>
>> Corey Richardson > wrote in
>> :
>>> Oh, it didn't surprise you then!
>>>
>>> It's now obvious that Steve's true "nature" is already general
>> knowledge
>>> in these groups, so I apologise for reiterating it.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> I don't have the energy to do what he does, so I am glad for the comic
>> relief. He also knows a hell of a lot about food and cooking, and isn't
>> a whiny little bitch.
>
>I agree with you 100%. Unlike Corey's sniveling around playing the Usenet
>"victim" card.

Yes, you're a "victim" when people forge you.

>Corey doesn't realize he is now owned by all of RFC.

That's *really* silly!

On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 17:32:03 GMT, "Michael \"Dog3\"" >
wrote:

>Sqwertz > news:240808.171200aff-f+rfc+ufm20.105
: in rec.food.cooking
>
>> Corey Richardson > wrote:
>>
>>> Could the people here who've e-mailed me please let me know that they
>>> have done so in one of these groups in future, please? I tend to miss
>>> them for hours if you don't!
>>>
>>> I've now just replied to those who mailed me, thanks!
>>
>> Ahh, the 'ol "All the lurkers support me in email" ploy.
>>
>> <yawn>
>
><yawn> is right. Next he'll be threatening to report you to everyone
>including your ISP, employer and probably Google itself.

You have me confused with someone like Sqwertz!

That's the sort of thing (along with forging) that he'd do!

On Sun, 24 Aug 2008 23:25:22 -0400, "Cornholio"
> wrote:

>
>
>"saerah gray" > wrote in message
.102...
>> TFM® > wrote in news:48b20cdb$0$23185
>> :
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> "saerah gray" > wrote in message
>>> . 102...
>>>> Corey Richardson > wrote in
>>>> :
>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 00:00:37 GMT, saerah gray >
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Corey Richardson > wrote in
>>>>>>news:b0t3b4pehk7525jqd09nesbi3qd0t0cgl1@4ax. com:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sun, 24 Aug 2008 19:35:16 -0400, "Edwin Pawlowski"
>> >
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>"Corey Richardson" > wrote in message
>>>>>>>>news:ham3b4t2qj2p2iosl9pidvuh7j80ogi1qj@4a x.com...
>>>>>>>>> Could the people here who've e-mailed me please let me know that
>>>>>>they
>>>>>>>>> have done so in one of these groups in future, please? I tend to
>>>>>>miss
>>>>>>>>> them for hours if you don't!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I've now just replied to those who mailed me, thanks!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Just because you're too lazy to check your inbox the rest of the
>>>>>>people
>>>>>>>>should clutter this group?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I informed those people who had e-mailed me that I sometimes take
>> a
>>>>>>> while to check my inbox and that a quick "heads-up" in these
>> groups
>>>>>>> would be beneficial to ensure a swift reply.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I did that in one post. It's hardly clutter...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>That's kind of like saying "I don't always pick up my phone at home,
>>>> so
>>>>>>by all means, stop by where I work to tell me you called"
>>>>>
>>>>> So, Usenet's like home and phone and work now...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yes.
>>>
>>>
>>> I got your back. I'm heavily armed and somewhat dangerous.
>>>
>>> TFM®
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Awesome. You been drinking?
>>
>> --
>> Saerah
>
>
>Are you threatening me?
>
>I need TP for my bunghole!

I've already given you TP for your bunghole!

On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 14:09:22 -0400, Albert Worschey
> wrote:

>Corey Richardson wrote:
>> On Sun, 24 Aug 2008 19:35:16 -0400, "Edwin Pawlowski" >
>> wrote:
>>
>>> "Corey Richardson" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> Could the people here who've e-mailed me please let me know that they
>>>> have done so in one of these groups in future, please? I tend to miss
>>>> them for hours if you don't!
>>>>
>>>> I've now just replied to those who mailed me, thanks!
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Just because you're too lazy to check your inbox the rest of the people
>>> should clutter this group?
>>
>> I informed those people who had e-mailed me that I sometimes take a
>> while to check my inbox and that a quick "heads-up" in these groups
>> would be beneficial to ensure a swift reply.
>>
>> I did that in one post. It's hardly clutter...
>>
>Mr Richardson! Sorry to bother you here, I emailed you late last week
>and I don't know if you got it but can I have your autograph?

Try mailing me again.

Corey Richardson wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Aug 2008 17:22:53 -0500, Sqwertz >
> wrote:
>
>> Corey Richardson > wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, 24 Aug 2008 17:12:00 -0500, Sqwertz >
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Corey Richardson > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Could the people here who've e-mailed me please let me know that they
>>>>> have done so in one of these groups in future, please? I tend to miss
>>>>> them for hours if you don't!
>>>>>
>>>>> I've now just replied to those who mailed me, thanks!
>>>> Ahh, the 'ol "All the lurkers support me in email" ploy.
>>> Who mentioned lurkers?
>>>
>>> And you'll *never* be privy to these e-mails, you sad forger.
>> <yawn>
>>
>> -sw
>
> Yes, you may as well <yawn> now that people in these groups know what
> you're *really* like.
>
> And you'll *never* be privy to these e-mails, you sad forger.
>

Get lost, you pathetic loser.

-dk

Corey Richardsn wrote:
> TFM® > wrote in news:48b216e7$0$23192
> :
>
>>
>> "saerah gray" > wrote in message
>> . 102...
>>> TFM® > wrote in news:48b20cdb$0$23185
>>> :
>>>
>>>>
>>>> "saerah gray" > wrote in message
>>>> . 102...
>>>>> Corey Richardson > wrote in
>>>>> :
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 00:00:37 GMT, saerah gray
> >
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Corey Richardson > wrote in
>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sun, 24 Aug 2008 19:35:16 -0400, "Edwin Pawlowski"
>>> >
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "Corey Richardson" > wrote in
> message
>>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>>> Could the people here who've e-mailed me please let me know
> that
>>>>>>> they
>>>>>>>>>> have done so in one of these groups in future, please? I tend
> to
>>>>>>> miss
>>>>>>>>>> them for hours if you don't!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I've now just replied to those who mailed me, thanks!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Just because you're too lazy to check your inbox the rest of the
>>>>>>> people
>>>>>>>>> should clutter this group?
>>>>>>>> I informed those people who had e-mailed me that I sometimes
> take
>>> a
>>>>>>>> while to check my inbox and that a quick "heads-up" in these
>>> groups
>>>>>>>> would be beneficial to ensure a swift reply.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I did that in one post. It's hardly clutter...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That's kind of like saying "I don't always pick up my phone at
> home,
>>>>> so
>>>>>>> by all means, stop by where I work to tell me you called"
>>>>>> So, Usenet's like home and phone and work now...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> Yes.
>>>>
>>>> I got your back. I'm heavily armed and somewhat dangerous.
>>>>
>>>> TFM®
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Awesome. You been drinking?
>>>
>>> --
>>> Saerah
>>
>> Heavily! It's my birthday!
>>
>> It seems no one caught on to my midnight post this morning.
>>
>> Born 8-24-66. 7 P.M.
>>
>>
>> TFM®
>>
>>
>
> Happy Birthday!
>
> You have the same birthday as my sister! (She turned 20 today)

Is she hot?

-dk

On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 19:01:14 -0400, DK > wrote:

>Corey Richardson wrote:
>> On Sun, 24 Aug 2008 17:22:53 -0500, Sqwertz >
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Corey Richardson > wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sun, 24 Aug 2008 17:12:00 -0500, Sqwertz >
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Corey Richardson > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Could the people here who've e-mailed me please let me know that they
>>>>>> have done so in one of these groups in future, please? I tend to miss
>>>>>> them for hours if you don't!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I've now just replied to those who mailed me, thanks!
>>>>> Ahh, the 'ol "All the lurkers support me in email" ploy.
>>>> Who mentioned lurkers?
>>>>
>>>> And you'll *never* be privy to these e-mails, you sad forger.
>>> <yawn>
>>>
>>> -sw
>>
>> Yes, you may as well <yawn> now that people in these groups know what
>> you're *really* like.
>>
>> And you'll *never* be privy to these e-mails, you sad forger.
>>
>
>Get lost, you pathetic loser.
>
>-dk

"Loser" for exposing forgers - I don't think so!

Why's your signature *just* like Sqwertz's?

Corey Richardson wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 19:01:14 -0400, DK > wrote:
>
>> Corey Richardson wrote:
>>> On Sun, 24 Aug 2008 17:22:53 -0500, Sqwertz >
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Corey Richardson > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, 24 Aug 2008 17:12:00 -0500, Sqwertz >
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Corey Richardson > wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Could the people here who've e-mailed me please let me know that they
>>>>>>> have done so in one of these groups in future, please? I tend to miss
>>>>>>> them for hours if you don't!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I've now just replied to those who mailed me, thanks!
>>>>>> Ahh, the 'ol "All the lurkers support me in email" ploy.
>>>>> Who mentioned lurkers?
>>>>>
>>>>> And you'll *never* be privy to these e-mails, you sad forger.
>>>> <yawn>
>>>>
>>>> -sw
>>> Yes, you may as well <yawn> now that people in these groups know what
>>> you're *really* like.
>>>
>>> And you'll *never* be privy to these e-mails, you sad forger.
>>>
>> Get lost, you pathetic loser.
>>
>> -dk
>
> "Loser" for exposing forgers - I don't think so!
>
> Why's your signature *just* like Sqwertz's?
>

Look very carefully and you'll see a major difference. Let me know if
you need help and we'll ask Sheldon to point it out for you.

-dk

On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 08:43:33 +0100, "Ophelia" > wrote:

>Corey Richardson wrote:
>> LOL! You think it's a joke when scum like Steve (Sqwertz) forge you
>> and then whine via inappropriate cross-posting to other newsgroups?
>
>Has anyone seen Steve start a crossposting? Perhaps he has but I haven't
>seen it.

Maybe you're blind then?

>On the other hand, you have just about wrecked uk.food+drink. misc.

I have!?

Am I the one cross-posting *lots* of forgeries to alt.usenet.kooks,
alt.religion.kibology, and alt.flame.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk?

No! It's your "friends" Steve (Sqwertz) and his cohorts that are doing
that.

Corey Richardson > wrote in
:

> On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 14:03:24 -0400, Albert Worschey
> > wrote:
>
>>Corey Richardson wrote:
>>
>>> LOL! You think it's a joke when scum like Steve (Sqwertz) forge you
and
>>> then whine via inappropriate cross-posting to other newsgroups?
>>>
>>Yes.
>
> Will you still find it a joke when Steve (Sqwertz) does it to you?
>
>

Probably.

--
Saerah

"Welcome to Usenet, Biatch! Adapt or haul ass!"
- some hillbilly from FL

DK > wrote in
:

> Corey Richardsn wrote:
>> TFM® > wrote in news:48b216e7$0$23192
>> :
>>
>>>
>>> "saerah gray" > wrote in message
>>> . 102...
>>>> TFM® > wrote in news:48b20cdb$0$23185
>>>> :
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "saerah gray" > wrote in message
>>>>> . 102...
>>>>>> Corey Richardson > wrote in
>>>>>> :
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 00:00:37 GMT, saerah gray
>> >
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Corey Richardson > wrote in
>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 24 Aug 2008 19:35:16 -0400, "Edwin Pawlowski"
>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "Corey Richardson" > wrote in
>> message
>>>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>>>> Could the people here who've e-mailed me please let me know
>> that
>>>>>>>> they
>>>>>>>>>>> have done so in one of these groups in future, please? I
tend
>> to
>>>>>>>> miss
>>>>>>>>>>> them for hours if you don't!
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I've now just replied to those who mailed me, thanks!
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Just because you're too lazy to check your inbox the rest of
the
>>>>>>>> people
>>>>>>>>>> should clutter this group?
>>>>>>>>> I informed those people who had e-mailed me that I sometimes
>> take
>>>> a
>>>>>>>>> while to check my inbox and that a quick "heads-up" in these
>>>> groups
>>>>>>>>> would be beneficial to ensure a swift reply.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I did that in one post. It's hardly clutter...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> That's kind of like saying "I don't always pick up my phone at
>> home,
>>>>>> so
>>>>>>>> by all means, stop by where I work to tell me you called"
>>>>>>> So, Usenet's like home and phone and work now...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes.
>>>>>
>>>>> I got your back. I'm heavily armed and somewhat dangerous.
>>>>>
>>>>> TFM®
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Awesome. You been drinking?
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Saerah
>>>
>>> Heavily! It's my birthday!
>>>
>>> It seems no one caught on to my midnight post this morning.
>>>
>>> Born 8-24-66. 7 P.M.
>>>
>>>
>>> TFM®
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Happy Birthday!
>>
>> You have the same birthday as my sister! (She turned 20 today)
>
> Is she hot?
>
> -dk
>

She's good looking, but an even bigger bitch than me

--
Saerah

"Welcome to Usenet, Biatch! Adapt or haul ass!"
- some hillbilly from FL

Corey Richardson > wrote:

> On Sun, 24 Aug 2008 21:46:45 -0500, Sqwertz >
> wrote:
>
>>Corey Richardson > wrote:
>>
>>> I don't have the time and energy to forge people over many groups also.
>>
>>If you saw how many posts I made using your name, and to what
>>groups, and what the content of those messages were
>
> Decent people can tell your trash forgeries.
>
>>How long are you going to go on about this?
>
> As long as you do it.

Didn't I stop, like, 48 hours ago when I realized the mistake? But
you're still going off like the Energizer Bunny (do they have an
Energizer Bunny in the UK? Or is it a lamb or mutton - or something
else cute, furry and edible?)

I mean, decent people can tell my forgeries, right?

Dude, move on with your life.

-sw

"Michael "Dog3"" > wrote:

> Sqwertz > news:240808.171200aff-f+rfc+ufm20.105
> @sqwertz.com: in rec.food.cooking
>
>> Corey Richardson > wrote:
>>
>>> Could the people here who've e-mailed me please let me know that they
>>> have done so in one of these groups in future, please? I tend to miss
>>> them for hours if you don't!
>>>
>>> I've now just replied to those who mailed me, thanks!
>>
>> Ahh, the 'ol "All the lurkers support me in email" ploy.
>>
>> <yawn>
>
> <yawn> is right. Next he'll be threatening to report you to everyone
> including your ISP, employer and probably Google itself.

Shhhh. Don't anybody tell him where I work. All these people
emailing him... I'm kinda paranoid about what they're telling him
about me.

ObFood: Stouffers Sweedish Meatballs for dinner. I've been sick
with a bad cold for the last 4-5 days and these didn't have much
taste either.

-sw

DK > wrote:

> Corey Richardsn wrote:
>
>> Happy Birthday!
>>
>> You have the same birthday as my sister! (She turned 20 today)
>
> Is she hot?

The same question popped into my mind, too. But then I realized it
was Corey Richardsn posting that.

Maybe we can get Corey to post a picture of a pizza (or something)
and sell T-Shirts and g-strings!

-sw

Corey Richardson > wrote:

> On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 14:09:22 -0400, Albert Worschey
> > wrote:
>
>>Mr Richardson! Sorry to bother you here, I emailed you late last week
>>and I don't know if you got it but can I have your autograph?
>
> Try mailing me again.

I thought you said you said you answered him yesterday with all
those other people who emailed you?

-sw

Sqwertz wrote:

>> <yawn> is right. Next he'll be threatening to report you to everyone
>> including your ISP, employer and probably Google itself.
>
> Shhhh. Don't anybody tell him where I work. All these people
> emailing him... I'm kinda paranoid about what they're telling him
> about me.
>
Well, he won't get out of me that you know where to buy the *best* Thai
mortar and pestles!

I wish this entire thread and the bickering, as well as all the damn OT
threads would just die out....

<sigh> As my husband reminds me- "People in hell want ice water"

Sqwertz > fnord news:250808.205808aff-
:

> DK > wrote:
>
>> Corey Richardsn wrote:
>>
>>> Happy Birthday!
>>>
>>> You have the same birthday as my sister! (She turned 20 today)
>>
>> Is she hot?
>
> The same question popped into my mind, too. But then I realized it
> was Corey Richardsn posting that.
>
> Maybe we can get Corey to post a picture of a pizza (or something)
> and sell T-Shirts and g-strings!
>
> -sw

My favorite part was putting her face on each pepperoni.

--
Saerah

"Welcome to Usenet, Biatch! Adapt or haul ass!"
- some hillbilly from FL

Goomba > fnord news:6hh6upFlssodU1
@mid.individual.net:

> Sqwertz wrote:
>
>>> <yawn> is right. Next he'll be threatening to report you to everyone
>>> including your ISP, employer and probably Google itself.
>>
>> Shhhh. Don't anybody tell him where I work. All these people
>> emailing him... I'm kinda paranoid about what they're telling him
>> about me.
>>
> Well, he won't get out of me that you know where to buy the *best*
Thai
> mortar and pestles!
>
> I wish this entire thread and the bickering, as well as all the damn
OT
> threads would just die out....
>
> <sigh> As my husband reminds me- "People in hell want ice water"
>

Do people in heaven want Flaming Moes?

--
Saerah

"Welcome to Usenet, Biatch! Adapt or haul ass!"
- some hillbilly from FL

Goomba wrote:

> Sqwertz wrote:
>
>>> <yawn> is right. Next he'll be threatening to report you to everyone
>>> including your ISP, employer and probably Google itself.
>>
>> Shhhh. Don't anybody tell him where I work. All these people
>> emailing him... I'm kinda paranoid about what they're telling him
>> about me.
>>
> Well, he won't get out of me that you know where to buy the *best* Thai
> mortar and pestles!
>
> I wish this entire thread and the bickering, as well as all the damn OT
> threads would just die out....

For some, this thread included, filter on [OT] in the Subject header.
Even Thunderbird can do that. You're reading it by choice.


--
Blinky
Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project: http://improve-usenet.org
Need a new news feed? http://blinkynet.net/comp/newfeed.html

Blinky the Shark wrote:
> Goomba wrote:
>
>> Sqwertz wrote:
>>
>>>> <yawn> is right. Next he'll be threatening to report you to everyone
>>>> including your ISP, employer and probably Google itself.
>>> Shhhh. Don't anybody tell him where I work. All these people
>>> emailing him... I'm kinda paranoid about what they're telling him
>>> about me.
>>>
>> Well, he won't get out of me that you know where to buy the *best* Thai
>> mortar and pestles!
>>
>> I wish this entire thread and the bickering, as well as all the damn OT
>> threads would just die out....
>
> For some, this thread included, filter on [OT] in the Subject header.
> Even Thunderbird can do that. You're reading it by choice.
>
>
Yes I did. That doesn't mean I approve of it. I think it has become far
too prevalent for a cooking group.

ObFood-Dulce de Leche sugar wafers by Goya.

Goomba wrote:

> Blinky the Shark wrote:
>> Goomba wrote:
>>
>>> Sqwertz wrote:
>>>
>>>>> <yawn> is right. Next he'll be threatening to report you to everyone
>>>>> including your ISP, employer and probably Google itself.
>>>> Shhhh. Don't anybody tell him where I work. All these people
>>>> emailing him... I'm kinda paranoid about what they're telling him
>>>> about me.
>>>>
>>> Well, he won't get out of me that you know where to buy the *best* Thai
>>> mortar and pestles!
>>>
>>> I wish this entire thread and the bickering, as well as all the damn OT
>>> threads would just die out....
>>
>> For some, this thread included, filter on [OT] in the Subject header.
>> Even Thunderbird can do that. You're reading it by choice.
>>
>>
> Yes I did. That doesn't mean I approve of it. I think it has become far
> too prevalent for a cooking group.

Again: so filter it.

When friends get together, discussion is going to range. This isn't
rec.cooking.corporate-tech-support-only.


--
Blinky
Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project: http://improve-usenet.org
Need a new news feed? http://blinkynet.net/comp/newfeed.html

Blinky the Shark wrote:

> When friends get together, discussion is going to range. This isn't
> rec.cooking.corporate-tech-support-only.
>
Thread drift is entirely fine... starting often stupid off topic threads
(IMO) is not. And they're not the same thing either.

Goomba wrote:

> Blinky the Shark wrote:
>
>> When friends get together, discussion is going to range. This isn't
>> rec.cooking.corporate-tech-support-only.
>>
> Thread drift is entirely fine... starting often stupid off topic threads
> (IMO) is not. And they're not the same thing either.

The "OT" designation, where present, allows you to filter them, even with
TB.

--
Blinky
Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project: http://improve-usenet.org
Need a new news feed? http://blinkynet.net/comp/newfeed.html

In article >,
Goomba > wrote:

> Blinky the Shark wrote:
>
> > When friends get together, discussion is going to range. This isn't
> > rec.cooking.corporate-tech-support-only.
> >
> Thread drift is entirely fine... starting often stupid off topic threads
> (IMO) is not. And they're not the same thing either.

Might be smarter to request that topical posts be named On Topic, then
set filters accordingly. Wouldn't be much reading.

--
-Barb, Mother Superior, HOSSSPoJ
http://web.mac.com/barbschaller, blahblahblog is back and
most recently updated last night, 8-17-2008. Fair entries are DONE!

"Saerah Gray" > wrote in message
. 102...
> Sqwertz > fnord news:250808.205808aff-
> :
>
>> DK > wrote:
>>
>>> Corey Richardsn wrote:
>>>
>>>> Happy Birthday!
>>>>
>>>> You have the same birthday as my sister! (She turned 20 today)
>>>
>>> Is she hot?
>>
>> The same question popped into my mind, too. But then I realized it
>> was Corey Richardsn posting that.
>>
>> Maybe we can get Corey to post a picture of a pizza (or something)
>> and sell T-Shirts and g-strings!
>>
>> -sw
>
> My favorite part was putting her face on each pepperoni.
>
> --
> Saerah
>
> "Welcome to Usenet, Biatch! Adapt or haul ass!"
> - some hillbilly from FL

Did you just call your Sister a Pizza face?

Michael "Dog3" wrote:

> Maybe you can enlighten me. I'm certainly not being critical so please
> don't take it that way. Can you tell me why you would read an OT thread
> and then proceed to make an OT post in said thread disapproving of OT
> posts? I will probably never understand why people feel the need to voice
> disapproval of posts clearly marked OT. Thread drift to OT is a
> completely other topic IMO.
>
Maybe you can enlighten me, too? WHY do people post feel a need to clog
up a cooking/food group by posting jokes, current events, political or
religious topics,yada yada yada, in the first place? Do they not have
real people in their lives to discuss these issues with? Or do they
think others haven't read the news also? Why not take that stuff to a
more appropriate group? Or send it via email to those of the same ilk.
I truly believe the preponderance of initiated off topic threads (versus
thread drift) has chased away too many serious posters and left us with
a glut of sad, lonely people who use RFC for their entire social life.
What makes deliberate off topic posts any different from spam then?

Michael "Dog3" wrote:

> Janet Baraclough >
> : in rec.food.cooking
>
>> The message >
>> from Goomba > contains these words:
>>
>>
>>> I wish this entire thread and the bickering, as well as all the damn
>>> OT threads would just die out....
>>
>> What people in rfc may not realise is, this is a deliberate,
>> organised attempt to wreck the group. Exactly the same has been done
>> to uk.food+drink.misc in the last 2 weeks by the very same
>> cross-posting trolls.
>> Janet
>
> ROFL... yes! It is a universal plot and the architecture to destroy
> this group was implemented by the leader of the CABAL.

Pssst! Michael, TINC.

--
Cheers
Chatty Cathy

Egg tastes better when it's not on your face...

Goomba > wrote in
:

> Michael "Dog3" wrote:
>
>> Maybe you can enlighten me. I'm certainly not being critical so
>> please don't take it that way. Can you tell me why you would read an
>> OT thread and then proceed to make an OT post in said thread
>> disapproving of OT posts? I will probably never understand why people
>> feel the need to voice disapproval of posts clearly marked OT.
>> Thread drift to OT is a completely other topic IMO.
>>
> Maybe you can enlighten me, too? WHY do people post feel a need to
> clog up a cooking/food group by posting jokes, current events,
> political or religious topics,yada yada yada, in the first place? Do
> they not have real people in their lives to discuss these issues with?
> Or do they think others haven't read the news also? Why not take that
> stuff to a more appropriate group? Or send it via email to those of
> the same ilk. I truly believe the preponderance of initiated off topic
> threads (versus thread drift) has chased away too many serious posters
> and left us with a glut of sad, lonely people who use RFC for their
> entire social life. What makes deliberate off topic posts any
> different from spam then?
>

Well I don't know about you Goomba...but the folk here at rfc have become
almost friends. And you share stuff with friends. Wether it be news
events, jokes, personal news whatever. Most of the stuff here mark OT is
stuff I'd hear while sitting around a kitchen table or coffee/break room
table. I came here originally to learn and share cooking ideas, tips and
recipies...I stay because of the personalities.

--

The house of the burning beet-Alan

"Goomba" > wrote in message
...
> Michael "Dog3" wrote:
>
>> Maybe you can enlighten me. I'm certainly not being critical so please
>> don't take it that way. Can you tell me why you would read an OT thread
>> and then proceed to make an OT post in said thread disapproving of OT
>> posts? I will probably never understand why people feel the need to voice
>> disapproval of posts clearly marked OT. Thread drift to OT is a
>> completely other topic IMO.
>>
> Maybe you can enlighten me, too? WHY do people post feel a need to clog up
> a cooking/food group by posting jokes, current events, political or
> religious topics,yada yada yada, in the first place? Do they not have real
> people in their lives to discuss these issues with? Or do they think
> others haven't read the news also? Why not take that stuff to a more
> appropriate group? Or send it via email to those of the same ilk.
> I truly believe the preponderance of initiated off topic threads (versus
> thread drift) has chased away too many serious posters and left us with a
> glut of sad, lonely people who use RFC for their entire social life.
> What makes deliberate off topic posts any different from spam then?

She's got my vote for Most Popular, whatch'all think?

Blinky the Shark wrote:

> Goomba wrote:

>>
>> I wish this entire thread and the bickering, as well as all the damn
>> OT threads would just die out....
>
> For some, this thread included, filter on [OT] in the Subject header.
> Even Thunderbird can do that.

This is true. TB's filtering leaves a lot to be desired, but it can
indeed do that much.

> You're reading it by choice.
>

Well, maybe somebody is holding a gun to goomba's head and saying, "Read
the OT posts or ELSE!"

You never can tell.
--
Cheers
Chatty Cathy

Egg tastes better when it's not on your face...

Michael "Dog3" wrote:

> Janet Baraclough >
> : in rec.food.cooking
>
>> The message >
>> from Goomba > contains these words:
>>
>>
>>> I wish this entire thread and the bickering, as well as all the damn OT
>>> threads would just die out....
>>
>> What people in rfc may not realise is, this is a deliberate,
>> organised attempt to wreck the group. Exactly the same has been done to
>> uk.food+drink.misc in the last 2 weeks by the very same cross-posting
>> trolls.
>> Janet
>
> ROFL... yes! It is a universal plot and the architecture to destroy this
> group was implemented by the leader of the CABAL.

[tiac?]


--
Blinky
Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project: http://improve-usenet.org
Need a new news feed? http://blinkynet.net/comp/newfeed.html

"hahabogus" > wrote i:
>
> Well I don't know about you Goomba...but the folk here at rfc have become
> almost friends. And you share stuff with friends. Wether it be news
> events, jokes, personal news whatever. Most of the stuff here mark OT is
> stuff I'd hear while sitting around a kitchen table or coffee/break room
> table. I came here originally to learn and share cooking ideas, tips and
> recipies...I stay because of the personalities.
>

What are you some kind of rank ****ing humanist? Bah! It's about the RULES,
man! Everything has to go in its proper little box or Goober gets the heebie
jeebies.