blake murphy wrote:

> On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 23:33:09 -0400, Stan Horwitz wrote:
>
> > In article >, Andy <q> wrote:
> >
> >> Wayne Boatwright said...
> >>
> >>> On Thu 28 Aug 2008 07:12:34p, Andy told us...
> >>>
> >>>> I HATE THIS BULLSHIT RHETORIC!!!
> >>>>
> >>>> Andy.
> >>>
> >>> Oh, for Christsakes, Andy. Why the hell did you have to start this!
> >>>
> >>> <all political crap and posters blocked from now until after the
> >> election>
> >>
> >>
> >> Wayne,
> >>
> >> I didn't invent the word whiteist, Obama did when he said it at the DNC
> >> tonight.
> >>
> >> A national embarrassment for a presidential hopeful of any color OR
> >> preference, imho.
> >>
> >> Andy
> >
> > I saw Obama's speech on TV. When did Obama say or imply anything
> > whiteist? Obama gave a masterful speech.
>
> trust me, none of these hate-filled head cases watched the speech. they'd
> rather cling to their ultra right-wing small-minded lies. maybe we'll get
> lucky and they'll all be too frightened to leave the house on election
day.
>


If I had my way you slobbering rabid mad - dog America - hating leftist
pukes would be put in CAGES, blake ...and you'd STAY there "for the
duration"...I wouldn't even CLEAN yer cages, either...

<chuckle>


--
Best
Greg

Paul M. Cook wrote:

> "blake murphy" > wrote in message
> ...
> > On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 21:25:14 -0500, Andy wrote:
> >
> >> Cheryl said...
> >>
> >>> He is looking "blacker" lately. Makeup?
> >>
> >>
> >> I'm ready to move to another country.
> >>
> >> "America is better??"
> >>
> >> Tell that to my brother that lost his business to NAFTA?
> >>
> >> Hopeless dreams.
> >>
> >> I'm leaving!
> >>
> >> Andy
> >>
> >> Best Cheryl!
> >>
> >> Good to you and yours.
> >>
> >> Andy
> >>
> >> I'll be where I don't what to be now.
> >>
> >> LET THERE BE NOW DOUBT!?!?
> >>
> >> Mother ****er!!!!!!
> >>
> >> I will give up my citizenship. Leave America to whoever cares.
> >>
> >> Breakfast in Bermuda with me.
> >>
> >> Nation of whitists? END OF STORY!
> >>
> >> Attack white complectioned people? Not MY PRESIDENT
> >
> > you've gone from mostly inane to completely insane. it's not a step up.
> >
> > hope you find a nice country filled with frightened white idiots,
because
> > you won't be missed here.
> >
>
> I thought he was an American already.


"Andy" is kinda "wierd"...I'd bet your next tax rebate check that he is one
of Steve Wertz's sockpuppoons...

;-)


--
Best
Greg

"Edwin Pawlowski" > wrote in message
...
>
> "cybercat" > wrote in message
>>>
>>> Yeah, yeah, yeah, just read a history book. Our political systems is
>>> run by lobbyists and both parties are failing the average citizen.
>
>> This attitude does not help anyone or anything, Edwin.
>>
>
>
> Perhaps if more people had my attitude the drones and hacks would get
> voted out and we could get some real honest to goodness statesmen in
> there. I'm a registered Independent and vote for various parties, not
> just the two big ones.
>
> There are problems getting good people to run for office as they are
> scrutinized so much by the media. One wrong move in high school and you
> are out. It would also be a good idea to downsize congress. Get rid of
> half the House. Get rid of half the staff of the ones left.
>

Since you are suggesting that Barack Obama is not a good man, back it up.

"Paul M. Cook" > wrote in message
...
>
> "blake murphy" > wrote in message
> ...
>> On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 21:25:14 -0500, Andy wrote:
>>
>>> Cheryl said...
>>>
>>>> He is looking "blacker" lately. Makeup?
>>>
>>>
>>> I'm ready to move to another country.
>>>
>>> "America is better??"
>>>
>>> Tell that to my brother that lost his business to NAFTA?
>>>
>>> Hopeless dreams.
>>>
>>> I'm leaving!
>>>
>>> Andy
>>>
>>> Best Cheryl!
>>>
>>> Good to you and yours.
>>>
>>> Andy
>>>
>>> I'll be where I don't what to be now.
>>>
>>> LET THERE BE NOW DOUBT!?!?
>>>
>>> Mother ****er!!!!!!
>>>
>>> I will give up my citizenship. Leave America to whoever cares.
>>>
>>> Breakfast in Bermuda with me.
>>>
>>> Nation of whitists? END OF STORY!
>>>
>>> Attack white complectioned people? Not MY PRESIDENT
>>
>> you've gone from mostly inane to completely insane. it's not a step up.
>>
>> hope you find a nice country filled with frightened white idiots, because
>> you won't be missed here.
>>
>
> I thought he was an American already.
>
Yes, I'd say your sense of humor is working just fine.

"Ophelia" > wrote in message
...
> Edwin, is your email good?
>
> Edwin Pawlowski wrote:

yes

"cybercat" > wrote in message
>>
>> There are problems getting good people to run for office as they are
>> scrutinized so much by the media. One wrong move in high school and you
>> are out. It would also be a good idea to downsize congress. Get rid of
>> half the House. Get rid of half the staff of the ones left.
>>
>
> Since you are suggesting that Barack Obama is not a good man, back it up.
>

I didn't say he is not "good" but there are better. My personal opinion is
that he is an empty suit just like most other politicians from both parties.
Rather than considering the good work a politician has done the media call
attention to things like a candidate had a zit when on the debate team.

Where are the Thomas Jeffersons of our country? How many of our great past
Presidents would have been elected in the People Magazine style of politics
today? Would they have even run for public office?

"Edwin Pawlowski" > wrote in message
...
>
> "cybercat" > wrote in message
>>>
>>> There are problems getting good people to run for office as they are
>>> scrutinized so much by the media. One wrong move in high school and you
>>> are out. It would also be a good idea to downsize congress. Get rid of
>>> half the House. Get rid of half the staff of the ones left.
>>>
>>
>> Since you are suggesting that Barack Obama is not a good man, back it up.
>>
>
> I didn't say he is not "good" but there are better. My personal opinion
> is that he is an empty suit just like most other politicians from both
> parties. Rather than considering the good work a politician has done the
> media call attention to things like a candidate had a zit when on the
> debate team.
>
> Where are the Thomas Jeffersons of our country? How many of our great
> past Presidents would have been elected in the People Magazine style of
> politics today? Would they have even run for public office?
>

What you are doing is simply voicing a general disgust with politics. That's
fine, but as I said in my first response, you're not doing anyone any good
with this attitude. Not yourself, not the country, not anyone.

blake murphy wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Aug 2008 10:33:57 -0400, Edwin Pawlowski wrote:
>> There are problems getting good people to run for office as they are
>> scrutinized so much by the media. One wrong move in high school and you are
>> out. It would also be a good idea to downsize congress. Get rid of half the
>> House. Get rid of half the staff of the ones left.
>
> yep, all we have to do is rewrite the constitution. can't wait to see what
> the do with the first ten amendments.
>
> your pal,
> blake


Hasn't Dubya already trashed most of 'em?

gloria
--------------
Obama in 08

In article >,
says...
>
> "cybercat" > wrote in message
> >>
> >> There are problems getting good people to run for office as they are
> >> scrutinized so much by the media. One wrong move in high school and you
> >> are out. It would also be a good idea to downsize congress. Get rid of
> >> half the House. Get rid of half the staff of the ones left.
> >>
> >
> > Since you are suggesting that Barack Obama is not a good man, back it up.
> >
>
> I didn't say he is not "good" but there are better. My personal opinion is
> that he is an empty suit just like most other politicians from both parties.
> Rather than considering the good work a politician has done the media call
> attention to things like a candidate had a zit when on the debate team.
>
> Where are the Thomas Jeffersons of our country? How many of our great past
> Presidents would have been elected in the People Magazine style of politics
> today? Would they have even run for public office?
>
>
>

An empty suit eh? Another one who doesn't get his experience at the
grass roots level. He did serve in the Illinois legslature ya know.

T wrote:
>
> An empty suit eh? Another one who doesn't get
> his experience at the grass roots level.

Tawkin suits, Barack dresses like Steve Urkel... the Obamas sure can
use a fashion adviser, and a tailor... their clothes don't fit...
looks like they both buy off the rack at Robert Hall. And if Michelle
ain't gonna wear a jacket she really needs to buy decent bras, if
yoose don't trust me on anything else trust me on this.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Hall_Clothes

http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...87179477483085




---

"T" > wrote in message
>
> An empty suit eh? Another one who doesn't get his experience at the
> grass roots level. He did serve in the Illinois legslature ya know.
>

So what? There are many politicians putting in time as state legislators in
every one of our states. Some good, some bad. Being there does not mean
much unless he achieved something. Speeches don't impress me as much as
attitude and action. I do have more respect for the guy that is good at
fixing traffic tickets over the guy just lining his pockets.

Ed wrote:

> Speeches don't impress me as much as attitude and action.

That's why I don't care for Biden. He may CALL himself a Democrat, but his
record shows otherwise:

- Pushing the RAVE Act
- Pushing for creation of the office of Drug Czar
- Advocating for even *more* litigation from the RIAA
- Earmarking $67 million in pork for his constituents in 2007
- Training and arming Muslims in Bosnia


His personal integrity is also suspect; he's been caught plagiarizing more
than once, and he has been caught lying about his academic credentials. He
doesn't deserve the office he *has*, let alone the office of the
vice-presidency.


Bob

On Fri, 29 Aug 2008 07:30:33 -0700 (PDT), Sheldon >
wrote:

>Obama is
>wealthy, not because he's just like everyone else, but because he's
>smart and energetic, unfortunately he's also a hypocrite.

Obama is wealthy? He wrote a book that made him enough money to pay
off his student loans and buy a house that by the standards of where I
live is quite modest.


--
I never worry about diets. The only carrots that interest me are the number of carats in a diamond.

Mae West

<sf> wrote in message ...
> On Fri, 29 Aug 2008 07:30:33 -0700 (PDT), Sheldon >
> wrote:
>
>>Obama is
>>wealthy, not because he's just like everyone else, but because he's
>>smart and energetic, unfortunately he's also a hypocrite.
>
> Obama is wealthy? He wrote a book that made him enough money to pay
> off his student loans and buy a house that by the standards of where I
> live is quite modest.
>
>
I am not arguing with these stupid mother****ers about politics. I may be
stupid but I am not that stupid. lol

On Sat, 30 Aug 2008 00:10:11 -0400, "cybercat" >
wrote:
>
><sf> wrote in message ...
>> On Fri, 29 Aug 2008 07:30:33 -0700 (PDT), Sheldon >
>> wrote:
>>
>>>Obama is
>>>wealthy, not because he's just like everyone else, but because he's
>>>smart and energetic, unfortunately he's also a hypocrite.
>>
>> Obama is wealthy? He wrote a book that made him enough money to pay
>> off his student loans and buy a house that by the standards of where I
>> live is quite modest.
>>
>>
>I am not arguing with these stupid mother****ers about politics. I may be
>stupid but I am not that stupid. lol
>

That wealth part was a really odd statement. I don't think his brain
was engaged.... or maybe he was just spouting Republican party line.

Those charges come from a man who is married to an heiress who is CEO
of the company she inherited AND they own multiple houses. One of
them, a million dollar plus model - which most likely one of their
less expensive homes, was featured in Architectural Digest a couple of
years ago (on the cover).

Republicans talk about hypocrisy, I think they should look in the
mirror to see what it *really* looks like.


--
I never worry about diets. The only carrots that interest me are the number of carats in a diamond.

Mae West

sf wrote:

> That wealth part was a really odd statement. I don't think his brain
> was engaged.... or maybe he was just spouting Republican party line.

BOTH candidates are extremely wealthy. It's ludicrous for one wealthy
candidate claim that he is more "in touch with the common man" by pointing
at the wealth of his opponent.

(I was going to say it's a case of the pot calling the kettle black, but...)

Bob

On Fri, 29 Aug 2008 22:55:03 -0700, "Bob Terwilliger"
> wrote:

>sf wrote:
>
>> That wealth part was a really odd statement. I don't think his brain
>> was engaged.... or maybe he was just spouting Republican party line.
>
>BOTH candidates are extremely wealthy. It's ludicrous for one wealthy
>candidate claim that he is more "in touch with the common man" by pointing
>at the wealth of his opponent.
>
>(I was going to say it's a case of the pot calling the kettle black, but...)
>

Good saying, might even be appropriate, but only one is extremely
wealthy. The other is living off royalties of a single book that *he*
wrote.



--
I never worry about diets. The only carrots that interest me are the number of carats in a diamond.

Mae West

On Fri, 29 Aug 2008 16:49:22 -0600, Gloria P wrote:

> blake murphy wrote:
>> On Fri, 29 Aug 2008 10:33:57 -0400, Edwin Pawlowski wrote:
>>> There are problems getting good people to run for office as they are
>>> scrutinized so much by the media. One wrong move in high school and you are
>>> out. It would also be a good idea to downsize congress. Get rid of half the
>>> House. Get rid of half the staff of the ones left.
>>
>> yep, all we have to do is rewrite the constitution. can't wait to see what
>> the do with the first ten amendments.
>>
>> your pal,
>> blake
>
>
> Hasn't Dubya already trashed most of 'em?
>
> gloria
> --------------
> Obama in 08

at least they're still there. hopefully, soon we'll have people in office
who respect them.

your pal,
blake

sf wrote:

>>> That wealth part was a really odd statement. I don't think his brain
>>> was engaged.... or maybe he was just spouting Republican party line.
>>
>>BOTH candidates are extremely wealthy. It's ludicrous for one wealthy
>>candidate claim that he is more "in touch with the common man" by pointing
>>at the wealth of his opponent.
>>
>>(I was going to say it's a case of the pot calling the kettle black,
>>but...)
>>
>
> Good saying, might even be appropriate, but only one is extremely
> wealthy. The other is living off royalties of a single book that *he*
> wrote.

Barack Obama reported an income of $4.2 million for 2007. He reported an
income of $1 million in 2006. The combined salary-derived income of Barack
and Michelle Obama was $260,735. You call that AVERAGE?

Of course, the bulk of most peoples' income goes toward paying their housing
costs, and Obama's housing costs are a bit lower than most run-of-the-mill
voters: Most people don't have their houses paid for by Nadhmi Auchi, an
Iraqi billionaire whose billions came from corrupt business dealings.

I'm not saying that makes Obama *worse* than McCain, of course. He might
just have been oblivious to the fact that $3.5 million
suddenly-and-magically materialized, or maybe he was simply being
opportunistic.

Bob

cybercat wrote:

> <sf> wrote in message ...
> > On Fri, 29 Aug 2008 07:30:33 -0700 (PDT), Sheldon >
> > wrote:
> >
> >>Obama is
> >>wealthy, not because he's just like everyone else, but because he's
> >>smart and energetic, unfortunately he's also a hypocrite.
> >
> > Obama is wealthy? He wrote a book that made him enough money to pay
> > off his student loans and buy a house that by the standards of where I
> > live is quite modest.
> >
> >
> I am not arguing with these stupid mother****ers about politics. I may be
> stupid but I am not that stupid. lol


"To say that 'cybercat' is totally despicable

Is hardly close to being applicable

She's full of hate

Hell is her fate

The bitch is more than fully contemptible..."


;-D


--
Best
Greg

" I find Greg Morrow lowbrow, witless, and obnoxious. For him to claim that
we are some
kind of comedy team turns my stomach."
- "cybercat" to me on rec.food.cooking

On Sat, 30 Aug 2008 20:39:37 -0700, Bob Terwilliger wrote:

> sf wrote:
>
>>>> That wealth part was a really odd statement. I don't think his brain
>>>> was engaged.... or maybe he was just spouting Republican party line.
>>>
>>>BOTH candidates are extremely wealthy. It's ludicrous for one wealthy
>>>candidate claim that he is more "in touch with the common man" by pointing
>>>at the wealth of his opponent.
>>>
>>>(I was going to say it's a case of the pot calling the kettle black,
>>>but...)
>>>
>>
>> Good saying, might even be appropriate, but only one is extremely
>> wealthy. The other is living off royalties of a single book that *he*
>> wrote.
>
> Barack Obama reported an income of $4.2 million for 2007. He reported an
> income of $1 million in 2006. The combined salary-derived income of Barack
> and Michelle Obama was $260,735. You call that AVERAGE?
>
> Of course, the bulk of most peoples' income goes toward paying their housing
> costs, and Obama's housing costs are a bit lower than most run-of-the-mill
> voters: Most people don't have their houses paid for by Nadhmi Auchi, an
> Iraqi billionaire whose billions came from corrupt business dealings.
>
> I'm not saying that makes Obama *worse* than McCain, of course. He might
> just have been oblivious to the fact that $3.5 million
> suddenly-and-magically materialized, or maybe he was simply being
> opportunistic.
>
> Bob

obama has never employed the 'regular guy' shtick, as far as i know. what
people are complaining about is the fabulously wealthy mccain calling him
an 'elitist.'

your pal,
blake