On Sep 6, 8:13?am, Stan Horwitz > wrote:

On Sat, 6 Sep 2008 05:33:00 -0700 (PDT), Sheldon >
wrote:

>> While Palin is back to Alaska, I hope she finds the time in her busy
>> life to return that $230 million she says she turned down for that
>> bridge to nowhere, but still hasn't returned to us American taxpayers.
>> And maybe when she resumes her work as Alaska's governor, she can
>> actually get Alaskan's off the public teat rather then supporting
>> lobbying efforts in Washington that cause Alaska to be the top ranked
>> state in receiving federal earmarks, based per capita.
>
>Wow... what a vivid imagination.
>Such ridiculous ASSumptions.

Not an assumption. She may have nixed the bridge to nowhere, but she
took the money anyway.


--
I never worry about diets. The only carrots that interest me are the number of carats in a diamond.

Mae West

In article >,
"Edwin Pawlowski" > wrote:

> "Stan Horwitz" > wrote in message
> >
> > If Palin is such a pit bull, then why did she return to Alaska after the
> > convention instead of going out on the campaign trail with McCain?
> > Normally at this stage of a presidential campaign, the VP on the ticket
> > would be out on the stump trail giving speeches and doing interviews
> > with the news media, on talk shows, etc. but this VP candidate made a
> > hasty retreat back to her home state. Some pit bull that is.
>
> So since her campaign stump does not meet your idea of the correct schedule
> she is no good? Geez Stan, you have to stop obsessing about stuff that you
> have no control over, have no information about and does not affect your
> life. Speculation of some stuff is just plain silly.

Its not a matter of meeting "my idea of the correct schedule," its that
she isn't stumping for McCain at all. How can anyone take a VP candidate
seriously when in the heat of the campaign, she retreats back home?

On Sat, 06 Sep 2008 18:06:00 -0400, Stan Horwitz >
wrote:

>Its not a matter of meeting "my idea of the correct schedule," its that
>she isn't stumping for McCain at all. How can anyone take a VP candidate
>seriously when in the heat of the campaign, she retreats back home?

Hey, she knows "a woman's place" and she's making points with someone.


--
I never worry about diets. The only carrots that interest me are the number of carats in a diamond.

Mae West

"Stan Horwitz" > wrote in message
...
> In article >,
> "Edwin Pawlowski" > wrote:
>
>> "Stan Horwitz" > wrote in message
>> >
>> > If Palin is such a pit bull, then why did she return to Alaska after
>> > the
>> > convention instead of going out on the campaign trail with McCain?
>> > Normally at this stage of a presidential campaign, the VP on the ticket
>> > would be out on the stump trail giving speeches and doing interviews
>> > with the news media, on talk shows, etc. but this VP candidate made a
>> > hasty retreat back to her home state. Some pit bull that is.
>>
>> So since her campaign stump does not meet your idea of the correct
>> schedule
>> she is no good? Geez Stan, you have to stop obsessing about stuff that
>> you
>> have no control over, have no information about and does not affect your
>> life. Speculation of some stuff is just plain silly.
>
> Its not a matter of meeting "my idea of the correct schedule," its that
> she isn't stumping for McCain at all. How can anyone take a VP candidate
> seriously when in the heat of the campaign, she retreats back home?

Oh, come on now, those high heels hurt after a while.

In article >,
Pan > wrote:

> On Sat, 06 Sep 2008 15:20:51 GMT, blake murphy
> >> Obama is a Trojan horse. What is really inside is the real mystery and
> >> will be the big surprise. His ties are closer to the east than the west.
> >>
> >> jay
> >
> >this is complete nonsense, and all but fools know it. he's written two
> >books and spent the last year explaining who he is.
> >
> >even if it was true, i would choose it over the wonders of bush iii.
> >
> >blake
>
> Well Blake he wrote two autobio's by the time he was 45. Most men wait
> until they are in their 60s +, when they have something to talk about.
> Both of Obana's book did not sell very well until he started to run
> for president, after 140 days in the senate. Less face it, Obama an
> empty suit.
>
> You keep trying to say that he has experience.
> I have asked before, what law did he introduce and get passed?

A quick search of http://www.senate.gov reveals the following ...

Senators Casey, Kennedy, and Obama introduced a bill "to help ensure
that service members and veterans are promptly reinstated in their
civilian jobs when they return from tours abroad." That bill was
introduced last month, so I don't know when it will be up for a vote.

The 2007 Higher Education Bill also included two proposals by Obama. One
provision will improve teacher training an the other will recognize and
fund predominantly black institutions.

In 2006, he introduced an act to expand college-level opportunities for
high school students using needs-based education grants.

This past spring, Obama cosponsored legislation to ban ALL earmarks for
the 2009 fiscal year.

If you go to http://thomas.loc.gov and search for Obama using the drop
down box, you can also find a lot of information. Here are a few
examples of bills Obama sponsored:

S.115 to amend the Energy Policy Act of 2005 to repeal certain IRS tax
incentives for the oil and gas industry.

S.117 to improve benefits and services for members of the Armed Forces,
veterans of the Global War on Terrorism, and other veterans, to require
reports on the effects of the Global War on Terrorism, and for other
purposes.

S.443 A bill to state United States policy for Iraq, and for other
purposes.

S.1084 A bill to provide housing assistance for very low-income veterans.

S.1222 A bill to stop mortgage transactions which operate to promote
fraud, risk, abuse, and under-development, and for other purposes.

S.1790 A bill to make grants to carry out activities to prevent the
incidence of unintended pregnancies and sexually transmitted infections
among teens in racial or ethnic minority or immigrant communities, and
for other purposes.

S.AMDT.923 to S.761 To expand the pipeline of individuals entering the
science, technology, engineering, and mathematics fields to support
United States innovation and competitiveness. Most of the bills I
mentioned are still in progress, but this one was passed by the senate
unanimously, as were several other bills Obama sponsored.

Here is a bill that Obama introduced that passed unanimously.
S.AMDT.2692 to H.R.2764 To require a comprehensive nuclear threat
reduction and security plan.

Here's aother bill Obama introduced that passed unanimously. S.AMDT.4114
to S.2663 To require the Comptroller General of the United States
conduct a study and report on the effectiveness of authorities relating
to the safety of imported consumer products.

So this Republican smeer tactic of accusing Obama of not doing anything
during his time in the senate is easily proved wrong.

Here's a question for you. How exactly has McCain distinguished himself
as a political maverick these past eight years. According to McCain
himself, he has supported Bush around 90% of the time. That's hardly
being a maverick, its being part of the problem. Hell, McCain even voted
against two of his own bills!

Let's see what McCain's been up to in the senate, shall we?

S.RES.70 : A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate that the
Commander of Multinational Forces-Iraq and all United States personnel
under his command should receive from Congress the full support
necessary to carry out the United States mission in Iraq. This bill
hasn't been voted upon.

McCain sponsored some bills that I agree with, but believe it or not, in
the past couple of years, Obama introduced or sponsored more senate
bills then McCain, although of them are not particularly interesting,
such as sponsoring a bill to request a commemorative stamp. Nothing in
McCain's recent list of sponsored bills suggests he's a political
maverick, nothing at all.

By the way, if experience is so important, why didn't the Republicans
nominate McCain back in the 2000 primary to run for president? Instead,
the Republicans nominated a draft dodger with no experience in national
and international issues; a man who had never even traveled outside the
United States before. As we all know, Bush ran for president again in
2004 on the basis of four years of experience in the White House. We see
how much good Bush's first four years of experience have gotten us: a
financial disaster and a disaster in Iraq where we taxpayers have spent
$1 trillion dollars and sacrificed more American lives then were taken
by the terrorists on 9/11.

In article
>,
Sheldon > wrote:

> On Sep 6, 8:13?am, Stan Horwitz > wrote:
> > In article >,
> > ?blake murphy > wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, 04 Sep 2008 18:24:26 -0400, Billy wrote:
> >
> > > > On Thu, 04 Sep 2008 07:36:50 -0500, jay > wrote:
> >
> > > >>Obama should have picked Oprah for VP.
> >
> > > > Why would she even THINK about taking a pay cut?
> >
> > > she certainly has more influence now than she would as v.p.
> >
> > If Palin is such a pit bull, then why did she return to Alaska after the
> > convention instead of going out on the campaign trail with McCain?
> > Normally at this stage of a presidential campaign, the VP on the ticket
> > would be out on the stump trail giving speeches and doing interviews
> > with the news media, on talk shows, etc. but this VP candidate made a
> > hasty retreat back to her home state. Some pit bull that is.
> >
> > The reason for Palin's retreat is obvious. She was poorly vetted.
> > McCain's campaign staff are stuck with her so the best they could do in
> > this sort period of time is to send her back to Alaska in the hopes that
> > she won't open her mouth in public and give us even more evidence that
> > she's a lying hypocrite with ideas that are totally out of step with
> > moderate and independent voters who McCain needs to woe over.
> >
> > While Palin is back to Alaska, I hope she finds the time in her busy
> > life to return that $230 million she says she turned down for that
> > bridge to nowhere, but still hasn't returned to us American taxpayers.
> > And maybe when she resumes her work as Alaska's governor, she can
> > actually get Alaskan's off the public teat rather then supporting
> > lobbying efforts in Washington that cause Alaska to be the top ranked
> > state in receiving federal earmarks, based per capita.
>
> Wow... what a vivid imagination.
> Such ridiculous ASSumptions.

Not ridiculous at all, and not a product of my imagination. What I said
in the posting above is all easily verified by non-biased sources.

On Sat, 06 Sep 2008 19:00:16 -0400, Stan Horwitz >
wrote:

>In article
>,
> Sheldon > wrote:
>
>>
>> Wow... what a vivid imagination.
>> Such ridiculous ASSumptions.
>
>Not ridiculous at all, and not a product of my imagination. What I said
>in the posting above is all easily verified by non-biased sources.

He's just as scary as his VP.
http://www.ppaction.org/ppvotes/08_a...icemccain.html


--
I never worry about diets. The only carrots that interest me are the number of carats in a diamond.

Mae West

Stan Horwitz wrote:
> In article >,
> "Edwin Pawlowski" > wrote:
>
>> "Stan Horwitz" > wrote in message
>>> If Palin is such a pit bull, then why did she return to Alaska after the
>>> convention instead of going out on the campaign trail with McCain?
>>> Normally at this stage of a presidential campaign, the VP on the ticket
>>> would be out on the stump trail giving speeches and doing interviews
>>> with the news media, on talk shows, etc. but this VP candidate made a
>>> hasty retreat back to her home state. Some pit bull that is.
>> So since her campaign stump does not meet your idea of the correct schedule
>> she is no good? Geez Stan, you have to stop obsessing about stuff that you
>> have no control over, have no information about and does not affect your
>> life. Speculation of some stuff is just plain silly.
>
> Its not a matter of meeting "my idea of the correct schedule," its that
> she isn't stumping for McCain at all. How can anyone take a VP candidate
> seriously when in the heat of the campaign, she retreats back home?


They are both in Colorado Springs today, a hotbed of
Republican Air Force retirees. Kinda like being "home"
since they won't face any hard, embarrassing questions.

gloria p

"Stan Horwitz" > wrote in message
> Its not a matter of meeting "my idea of the correct schedule," its that
> she isn't stumping for McCain at all. How can anyone take a VP candidate
> seriously when in the heat of the campaign, she retreats back home?

The campaign is just getting started and you are talking about ONE day.
Since neither of us knows why, your speculation is just plain silly. She may
have other important obligations, such as running her state, that cannot be
postponed. She may have an appointment at the Planned Parenthood clinic.
She may be presiding over a meeting of Moose Hunters International's annual
convention. Maybe she is getting implants so she can stand out a bit more.

Who cares, (other than you)? BTW, I left work early two days last week and
did not report it here. No one cares.

Stan Horwitz wrote:

> Its not a matter of meeting "my idea of the correct schedule," its that
> she isn't stumping for McCain at all. How can anyone take a VP candidate
> seriously when in the heat of the campaign, she retreats back home?

Perhaps since she only had a week notice on this new gig, she had to go
and tie up some loose ends back in AK, huh? Because she takes her
responsibilities seriously? Was she required to inform you of her every
move?
Why do you go out of your way to imagine drama?

Gloria P wrote:

>> Its not a matter of meeting "my idea of the correct schedule," its
>> that she isn't stumping for McCain at all. How can anyone take a VP
>> candidate seriously when in the heat of the campaign, she retreats
>> back home?
>
>
> They are both in Colorado Springs today, a hotbed of
> Republican Air Force retirees. Kinda like being "home"
> since they won't face any hard, embarrassing questions.
>
> gloria p

yeah, I hear the reporters and pundits don't go out of their way to ask
Obama those hard questions.....

On Sep 7, 9:32�am, Goomba > wrote:
> Stan Horwitz wrote:
> > Its not a matter of meeting "my idea of the correct schedule," its that
> > she isn't stumping for McCain at all. How can anyone take a VP candidate
> > seriously when in the heat of the campaign, she retreats back home?
>
> Perhaps since she only had a week notice on this new gig, she had to go
> and tie up some loose ends back in AK, huh? �Because she takes her
> responsibilities seriously? Was she required to inform you of her every
> move?
> Why do you go out of your way to imagine drama?

If all someone has to come home to is a weenie toaster oven and a
bottle of Heinz ketchup he's got to juice up his life somehow... I bet
Stan can get a job writing for http://www.globemagazine.com LOL

On Sep 6, 10:51�pm, "Edwin Pawlowski" > wrote:
> "Stan Horwitz" > wrote in message
> > Its not a matter of meeting "my idea of the correct schedule," its that
> > she isn't stumping for McCain at all. How can anyone take a VP candidate
> > seriously when in the heat of the campaign, she retreats back home?
>
> The campaign is just getting started and you are talking about ONE day.
> Since neither of us knows why, your speculation is just plain silly. She may
> have other important obligations, such as running her state, that cannot be
> postponed. � She may have an appointment at the Planned Parenthood clinic.
> She may be presiding over a meeting of Moose Hunters International's annual
> convention. �Maybe she is getting implants so she can stand out a bit more.

I don't think so... looks to me that Sarah Palin is pretty healthily
endowed... she purposely wears those flat fronted high cut outfits as
a feeble attempt at toning down her obviously zoftig feminine assets.
Clothes make all the difference. Women in high power occupations who
want to be taken seriously dress carefully.
http://www.time.com/time/photogaller...758999,00.html


> Who cares, (other than you)? �BTW, I left work early two days last week and
> did not report it here. �No one cares.

On Sat, 6 Sep 2008 12:55:59 -0400, Edwin Pawlowski wrote:

> "Stan Horwitz" > wrote in message
>>
>> If Palin is such a pit bull, then why did she return to Alaska after the
>> convention instead of going out on the campaign trail with McCain?
>> Normally at this stage of a presidential campaign, the VP on the ticket
>> would be out on the stump trail giving speeches and doing interviews
>> with the news media, on talk shows, etc. but this VP candidate made a
>> hasty retreat back to her home state. Some pit bull that is.
>
> So since her campaign stump does not meet your idea of the correct schedule
> she is no good? Geez Stan, you have to stop obsessing about stuff that you
> have no control over, have no information about and does not affect your
> life. Speculation of some stuff is just plain silly.

well, it *is* pretty odd that someone is nominated for vice president and
their first act is to disappear from public view.

'call me if you need any maverickin' done, john. until then i'll be home
reading the cliffs notes version of "the world outside alaska."'

your pal,
blake

On Sat, 06 Sep 2008 15:12:32 -0700, sf wrote:

> On Sat, 06 Sep 2008 18:06:00 -0400, Stan Horwitz >
> wrote:
>
>>Its not a matter of meeting "my idea of the correct schedule," its that
>>she isn't stumping for McCain at all. How can anyone take a VP candidate
>>seriously when in the heat of the campaign, she retreats back home?
>
> Hey, she knows "a woman's place" and she's making points with someone.

yeah, but how many votes does her husband have?

your pal,
blake

On Sat, 06 Sep 2008 19:41:04 -0600, Gloria P wrote:

> Stan Horwitz wrote:
>> In article >,
>> "Edwin Pawlowski" > wrote:
>>
>>> "Stan Horwitz" > wrote in message
>>>> If Palin is such a pit bull, then why did she return to Alaska after the
>>>> convention instead of going out on the campaign trail with McCain?
>>>> Normally at this stage of a presidential campaign, the VP on the ticket
>>>> would be out on the stump trail giving speeches and doing interviews
>>>> with the news media, on talk shows, etc. but this VP candidate made a
>>>> hasty retreat back to her home state. Some pit bull that is.
>>> So since her campaign stump does not meet your idea of the correct schedule
>>> she is no good? Geez Stan, you have to stop obsessing about stuff that you
>>> have no control over, have no information about and does not affect your
>>> life. Speculation of some stuff is just plain silly.
>>
>> Its not a matter of meeting "my idea of the correct schedule," its that
>> she isn't stumping for McCain at all. How can anyone take a VP candidate
>> seriously when in the heat of the campaign, she retreats back home?
>
>
> They are both in Colorado Springs today, a hotbed of
> Republican Air Force retirees. Kinda like being "home"
> since they won't face any hard, embarrassing questions.
>
> gloria p

apparently, on friday she was reading lines off a teleprompter to introduce
mccain:

Appearing at rallies today with John McCain in Wisconsin and Michigan,
Sarah Palin mostly repeated lines first delivered in her convention speech
in Wednesday.

And, at least in Michigan, she again read them with the assistance of a
teleprompter.

There were two set up just to the left and right of the podium on the
amphitheater stage in Macomb County, just outside of Detroit. A campaign
aide confirmed she used them the help deliver her introduction of McCain.

<http://www.politico.com/blogs/jonathanmartin/0908/Palin_still_using_prompter.html>

that's some fine pit-bullin'.

your pal,
blake

On Sun, 07 Sep 2008 09:34:32 -0400, Goomba wrote:

> Gloria P wrote:
>
>>> Its not a matter of meeting "my idea of the correct schedule," its
>>> that she isn't stumping for McCain at all. How can anyone take a VP
>>> candidate seriously when in the heat of the campaign, she retreats
>>> back home?
>>
>>
>> They are both in Colorado Springs today, a hotbed of
>> Republican Air Force retirees. Kinda like being "home"
>> since they won't face any hard, embarrassing questions.
>>
>> gloria p
>
> yeah, I hear the reporters and pundits don't go out of their way to ask
> Obama those hard questions.....

apparently, they won't have a chance to ask palin *any* questions until she
feels 'comfortable'

but she's not scared, though:

Sept. 7 (Bloomberg) -- Republican vice presidential nominee Sarah Palin
isn't giving interviews to the news media and won't until "the campaign is
ready,'' campaign manager Rick Davis said today.

Palin will answer questions from reporters "when we think it's time and
when she feels comfortable doing it,'' Davis told "Fox News Sunday.''

Palin, the governor of Alaska, was picked by Republican presidential
nominee John McCain on Aug. 29 to be his running mate. Palin gave a speech
at the Republican National Convention and has appeared at campaign events.

"She's not scared to answer questions, but you know what?'' Davis said. "We
run our campaign, not the news media.''

<http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x3475392>

the ****ing nerve of those reporters, wanting to ask questions of the woman
who would be president if mcgrampa plotzes!

and, no, i don't think obama is getting a pass from the press. if
anything, it's mccain enjoying that. they're 'his base.'

your pal,
blake

"blake murphy" > wrote
> <http://www.politico.com/blogs/jonathanmartin/0908/Palin_still_using_prompter.html>
>
> that's some fine pit-bullin'.
>
Has anyone pointed out that the original joke was, "What is the difference
between a woman with PMS and a pit bull?"

"blake murphy" > wrote :
>
> 'call me if you need any maverickin' done, john. until then i'll be home
> reading the cliffs notes version of "the world outside alaska."'
>

If you continue to neglect me, I am not bringing the whale mask.

I am just telling you.

On Sun, 07 Sep 2008 09:32:04 -0400, Goomba wrote:

> Stan Horwitz wrote:
>
>> Its not a matter of meeting "my idea of the correct schedule," its that
>> she isn't stumping for McCain at all. How can anyone take a VP candidate
>> seriously when in the heat of the campaign, she retreats back home?
>
> Perhaps since she only had a week notice on this new gig, she had to go
> and tie up some loose ends back in AK, huh? Because she takes her
> responsibilities seriously? Was she required to inform you of her every
> move?
> Why do you go out of your way to imagine drama?

what does it show about mccain's judgment that he chose someone so
unprepared?

it's completely unheard of that a national candidate would take 'time off'
less than two months before the election. it simply isn't done.

your pal,
blake

"blake murphy" > wrote in message
>
> it's completely unheard of that a national candidate would take 'time off'
> less than two months before the election. it simply isn't done.
>
> your pal,
> blake

I'm amazed that so many people know where she is and what she is (or is not)
doing. Just because she is not on the news every night does not mean she is
not working. I'm guessing you and Stan got the hots for her and miss seeing
her on TV.

On Sat, 06 Sep 2008 18:59:17 -0400, Stan Horwitz >
wrote:

>In article >,
> Pan > wrote:

>> You keep trying to say that he has experience.
>> I have asked before, what law did he introduce and get passed?
>
>A quick search of http://www.senate.gov reveals the following ...
>
Cut
A number of bills, introduced by others, joined as co sponsor by
Obama, and none originated by Obama.

One that I know was introduced by Obama and passed, was renaming a
post office for soldier kill in Iraq.

On Sat, 06 Sep 2008 16:32:39 -0700, sf wrote:

>On Sat, 06 Sep 2008 19:00:16 -0400, Stan Horwitz >
>wrote:
>
>>In article
>,
>> Sheldon > wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Wow... what a vivid imagination.
>>> Such ridiculous ASSumptions.
>>
>>Not ridiculous at all, and not a product of my imagination. What I said
>>in the posting above is all easily verified by non-biased sources.
>
>He's just as scary as his VP.
>http://www.ppaction.org/ppvotes/08_a...icemccain.html

sf all those things are to his credit.

On Sun, 07 Sep 2008 12:56:21 -0700, Pan > wrote:

>On Sat, 06 Sep 2008 16:32:39 -0700, sf wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 06 Sep 2008 19:00:16 -0400, Stan Horwitz >
>>wrote:
>>
>>>In article
>,
>>> Sheldon > wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Wow... what a vivid imagination.
>>>> Such ridiculous ASSumptions.
>>>
>>>Not ridiculous at all, and not a product of my imagination. What I said
>>>in the posting above is all easily verified by non-biased sources.
>>
>>He's just as scary as his VP.
>>http://www.ppaction.org/ppvotes/08_a...icemccain.html
>
>sf all those things are to his credit.

I see. Might as well eliminate those pesky 13th and 19th amendments
too.


--
I never worry about diets. The only carrots that interest me are the number of carats in a diamond.

Mae West

cybercat wrote:

> "blake murphy" > wrote
> >
<http://www.politico.com/blogs/jonath..._using_prompte
r.html>
> >
> > that's some fine pit-bullin'.
> >
> Has anyone pointed out that the original joke was, "What is the difference
> between a woman with PMS and a pit bull?"


"There's this 'cybercat' not at all regal

Who forced herself on a seagull

The bird tried to escape

It was definitely rape

Now 'cybercat's' in jail cause it's illegal..."


--
Best
Greg

On Sun, 07 Sep 2008 19:55:00 GMT, Michael "Dog3" wrote:

> blake murphy >
> : in rec.food.cooking
>
>> "She's not scared to answer questions, but you know what?'' Davis
>> said. "We run our campaign, not the news media.''
>
> <snort> Translation: She'll be allowed to speak her own mind only after
> the Republican ticket wins the election.
>
> Michael

someone has said that, in the cheney tradition, she's training for the vice
presidency by hiding out in an undisclosed location.

your pal,
blake

On Sun, 7 Sep 2008 14:38:01 -0400, cybercat wrote:

> "blake murphy" > wrote :
>>
>> 'call me if you need any maverickin' done, john. until then i'll be home
>> reading the cliffs notes version of "the world outside alaska."'
>>
>
> If you continue to neglect me, I am not bringing the whale mask.
>
> I am just telling you.

your never far from my thoughts, honey.

your pal,
blake

On Sun, 7 Sep 2008 15:48:26 -0400, Edwin Pawlowski wrote:

> "blake murphy" > wrote in message
>>
>> it's completely unheard of that a national candidate would take 'time off'
>> less than two months before the election. it simply isn't done.
>>
>> your pal,
>> blake
>
> I'm amazed that so many people know where she is and what she is (or is not)
> doing. Just because she is not on the news every night does not mean she is
> not working. I'm guessing you and Stan got the hots for her and miss seeing
> her on TV.

see, here's the thing edwin: a nominee customarily *goes out and runs for
the office*. she doesn't 'wrap up her personal affairs' as if she was
going off to prison, or in this case, 'find out what the vice president
does all day.'

your pal,
blake
blake

On Sun, 07 Sep 2008 19:56:36 GMT, Michael "Dog3" wrote:

> blake murphy >
> : in rec.food.cooking
>
>>
>> what does it show about mccain's judgment that he chose someone so
>> unprepared?
>>
>> it's completely unheard of that a national candidate would take 'time
>> off' less than two months before the election. it simply isn't done.
>
> Hmmm... I might have to look up where ole Dubya'was a couple of months
> before the '04 election. There is a 50/50 chance he might have been
> relaxin' at the ranch.
>
> Michael

given w's work habits, it's possible. but i bet rove was flogging him
between the convention and the election.

your pal,
blake

On Sun, 07 Sep 2008 13:42:04 -0700, sf wrote:


>>>
>>>He's just as scary as his VP.
>>>http://www.ppaction.org/ppvotes/08_a...icemccain.html
>>
>>sf all those things are to his credit.
>
>I see. Might as well eliminate those pesky 13th and 19th amendments
>too.

Oh which amendment insures that the government will provide sex
education, free sex protection, and abortion?

On Sun, 07 Sep 2008 20:00:45 GMT, "Michael \"Dog3\"" >
wrote:


>
>I can't speak for Blake or Stan. AFAIC Palin can pack the kids, guns,
>soccer balls, lipstick and mooseburgers back into the minivan, head back
>to Alaska, and stay there until hell freezes over.
>
>Michael
Why so Michael. I will appreciate your calm, thoughtful opinion.

On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 16:23:15 GMT, blake murphy
> wrote:


>
>see, here's the thing edwin: a nominee customarily *goes out and runs for
>the office*. she doesn't 'wrap up her personal affairs' as if she was
>going off to prison, or in this case, 'find out what the vice president
>does all day.'
>
>your pal,
>blake
>blake
Blake she has been on the stump since the end of the Rep comvention.
And she will be on ABC on thursday.
Every body else knew whese she was, I guess you were out of the loop,
or you were trying to stir the pot.

"blake murphy" > wrote in message
. ..
> On Thu, 04 Sep 2008 19:45:45 -0700, sf wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 4 Sep 2008 14:03:32 -0500, "Gregory Morrow"
>> > wrote:
>>
>>>[The way some some of these liberal Dems think is that Obama should be
>>>the
>>>only candidate on the Presidential ballot and that peeps should only be
>>>permitted to vote "yes" or "no"...kinda like the 'ole USSR or other
>>>dictatorships. But then current US liberalism *
>>
>>
>> I don't know how you came up with that line of thought, Greg.
>>
>> You're sounding like a scared conservative right now - looking for the
>> boogeyman under your bed and in your closet.
>
> i hope he knows that it's bullshit...but he just might be that stupid.
>
> yourpal,
> blake

He did vote for Bush twice.

"blake murphy" > wrote in message
>
> see, here's the thing edwin: a nominee customarily *goes out and runs for
> the office*. she doesn't 'wrap up her personal affairs' as if she was
> going off to prison, or in this case, 'find out what the vice president
> does all day.'
>
> your pal,
> blake
> blake

Well, we want change don't we? This is a start

On Sun, 7 Sep 2008 23:00:05 -0500, "Gregory Morrow"
> wrote:

>
>
>cybercat wrote:
>
>> "blake murphy" > wrote
>> >
><http://www.politico.com/blogs/jonath..._using_prompte
>r.html>
>> >
>> > that's some fine pit-bullin'.
>> >
>> Has anyone pointed out that the original joke was, "What is the difference
>> between a woman with PMS and a pit bull?"
>
>
>"There's this 'cybercat' not at all regal
>
>Who forced herself on a seagull
>
>The bird tried to escape
>
>It was definitely rape
>
>Now 'cybercat's' in jail cause it's illegal..."

Is that supposed to be a limerick?


--
I never worry about diets. The only carrots that interest me are the number of carats in a diamond.

Mae West

On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 20:41:21 -0700, sf wrote:


>>>
>>>I see. Might as well eliminate those pesky 13th and 19th amendments
>>>too.
>>
>>Oh which amendment insures that the government will provide sex
>>education, free sex protection, and abortion?
>
>Since you agree with eliminating all of the above, you might as well
>go all the way. What's the matter with taking away all rights instead
>of just a few?

Oh nice try SF, but where did I advocate taking this thing away. And
they are not rights, because they are not contained in the
constitution.
And if you want these things, pay for them, & not with tax money.

On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 05:20:07 GMT, "Michael \"Dog3\""
> wrote:


>
>Too many reasons to list but here are a couple: 1) I find her religious
>affiliations extremely frightening and dangerous. 2) I don't have any
>confidence in her ability to run the country if it should come down to
>that.
>
>Michael

You know that this is an election of comparison?
1) I find her religious affiliations are more centrist then BHO's
are. He spent 20 years in an anti-American, racist church.
2) My confidence in her executive experience, is higher then in the
community organizer. She was a governor of a state with 11 Billion $
budget and 25 K workers.

On Mon, 8 Sep 2008 19:01:22 -0700, Mike wrote:

> "blake murphy" > wrote in message
> . ..
>> On Thu, 04 Sep 2008 19:45:45 -0700, sf wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 4 Sep 2008 14:03:32 -0500, "Gregory Morrow"
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>>[The way some some of these liberal Dems think is that Obama should be
>>>>the
>>>>only candidate on the Presidential ballot and that peeps should only be
>>>>permitted to vote "yes" or "no"...kinda like the 'ole USSR or other
>>>>dictatorships. But then current US liberalism *
>>>
>>>
>>> I don't know how you came up with that line of thought, Greg.
>>>
>>> You're sounding like a scared conservative right now - looking for the
>>> boogeyman under your bed and in your closet.
>>
>> i hope he knows that it's bullshit...but he just might be that stupid.
>>
>> yourpal,
>> blake
>
> He did vote for Bush twice.

case closed.

frankly, any *** man who votes republican is either a self-loather or has
some other mental problem.

your pal,
blake

On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 22:33:20 -0700, sf wrote:

> On Sun, 7 Sep 2008 23:00:05 -0500, "Gregory Morrow"
> > wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>cybercat wrote:
>>
>>> "blake murphy" > wrote
>>> >
>><http://www.politico.com/blogs/jonath..._using_prompte
>>r.html>
>>> >
>>> > that's some fine pit-bullin'.
>>> >
>>> Has anyone pointed out that the original joke was, "What is the difference
>>> between a woman with PMS and a pit bull?"
>>
>>
>>"There's this 'cybercat' not at all regal
>>
>>Who forced herself on a seagull
>>
>>The bird tried to escape
>>
>>It was definitely rape
>>
>>Now 'cybercat's' in jail cause it's illegal..."
>
> Is that supposed to be a limerick?

no, just more gibberish.

your pal,
blake

blake murphy wrote:

> On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 22:33:20 -0700, sf wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 7 Sep 2008 23:00:05 -0500, "Gregory Morrow"
> > > wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >>cybercat wrote:
> >>
> >>> "blake murphy" > wrote
> >>> >
>
>><http://www.politico.com/blogs/jonath...ll_using_promp
te
> >>r.html>
> >>> >
> >>> > that's some fine pit-bullin'.
> >>> >
> >>> Has anyone pointed out that the original joke was, "What is the
difference
> >>> between a woman with PMS and a pit bull?"
> >>
> >>
> >>"There's this 'cybercat' not at all regal
> >>
> >>Who forced herself on a seagull
> >>
> >>The bird tried to escape
> >>
> >>It was definitely rape
> >>
> >>Now 'cybercat's' in jail cause it's illegal..."
> >
> > Is that supposed to be a limerick?
>
> no, just more gibberish.


Statutes against animal abuse are not "gibberish", my good man...


--
Best
Greg