Saerah wrote:

>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carnivore_(software)
>>
>
> OMG! the feds are out to get us!

One of the more notorious Usenet k00k/trolls believes that its movements are
being tracked by Google Maps.

Bob

On Sat, 6 Sep 2008 00:49:33 -0700, "Bob Terwilliger"
> wrote:

>Saerah wrote:
>
>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carnivore_(software)
>>>
>>
>> OMG! the feds are out to get us!
>
>One of the more notorious Usenet k00k/trolls believes that its movements are
>being tracked by Google Maps.
>
If it was true... that would be very cool. LOL! I'd like to think
everything is all about me.

Unfortunately, it's not.



--
I never worry about diets. The only carrots that interest me are the number of carats in a diamond.

Mae West

On Sat, 6 Sep 2008 00:47:08 -0700, "Bob Terwilliger"
> wrote:

>sf wrote:
>
>> Not wanting to research every post to every thread... but wondering
>> what transpired that I've missed.
>
>The test results came back.
>
I didn't see three dots after your post, so you've got me on pins and
needles now.





--
I never worry about diets. The only carrots that interest me are the number of carats in a diamond.

Mae West

Bob Terwilliger wrote:

> Saerah wrote:
>
>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carnivore_(software)
>>>
>>
>> OMG! the feds are out to get us!
>
> One of the more notorious Usenet k00k/trolls believes that its movements are
> being tracked by Google Maps.

I've seen him but can't remember the name/nym. Can you help me, here?


--
Blinky
Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project: http://improve-usenet.org
Need a new news feed? http://blinkynet.net/comp/newfeed.html

cybercat wrote:


>
> You read me wrong. I don't hate the OT posts, I am disgusted with the
> idiots. Jay writes that "muslims are scary." Omelet writes that
> "affirmative action gets you a free education." George thinks Obama
> stands for power flowing from the goverment to the people and not the
> other way around. "Chatty Cathy" thinks you have to have borne a child
> to understand anything about children. The foam-flecked ****williger
> assumes that those who support Obama "get more from the system than
> they pay into it." And "Goomba," where to even begin? She thinks,
> among other unbelievably asinine things, that the girl's room and the
> boy's locker room count as sex education.
>
> Ob food, I'll have whatever these dickfaces are NOT having.

Ah. You're gonna have take-out again, I see. Don't blame you - I
wouldn't wanna eat your 'home cooking' either.

BTW, that's *Mrs.* Dickface to you.
--
Cheers
Chatty Cathy

There is no such thing as a little garlic. ~A. Baer

ChattyCathy wrote:

> BTW, that's *Mrs.* Dickface to you.

<snort>

--
Blinky
Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project: http://improve-usenet.org
Need a new news feed? http://blinkynet.net/comp/newfeed.html

Sqwertz wrote:

> Saerah Gray > wrote:
>
>> Sqwertz > fnord
>> :
>>
>>> Gee. If people didn't spend so much time on OT threads, imagine how
>>> much time they'd have to type about cooking? (assuming they know how
>>> to cook in the first place).
>>
>> Hey, some of us have no life! This is the most social I get most of
>> the week.
>
> Mee too, lately. That's why I've been pouring on the charm lately.
> And I'm home all weekend, so expect the wurstz.

Kewl. So we can expect plenty more 'do as I say, not do as I do'
threads. I can't wait.
>
> Heck, Maybe OM will swing by and pick me up to go shopping this
> weekend... Maybe she can smack some sense into me with her whips
> and chains.

TMI.

--
Cheers
Chatty Cathy

There is no such thing as a little garlic. ~A. Baer

sf wrote:

> On Fri, 5 Sep 2008 20:54:23 -0400, "cybercat" >
> wrote:
>
>>While many would say that I do not suffer fools
>>gladly, I now believe that I give people wayyyy too much credit. I
>>must because I am continually surprised when they show their idiocy.
>>
>
> Not wanting to research every post to every thread... but wondering
> what transpired that I've missed. It seems to me that posters have
> stayed in line with their public persona. I haven't had any big
> surprises lately.

In a nutshell, some folks disagreed with cybercat in another thread
<gasp>, so now we're all 'dickheads' (as usual). Then, cybercat started
this hissy-fit thread just because she can - again that's her usual
style. So, yes, she stayed in line with *her* public persona, that's
for sure.

However, this is Usenet, and r.f.c. is an unmoderated group (thank
heavens) so she can keep making a fool of herself for as long as she
wishes, no skin off my nose.
--
Cheers
Chatty Cathy

There is no such thing as a little garlic. ~A. Baer

sf wrote:

>>> Not wanting to research every post to every thread... but wondering
>>> what transpired that I've missed.
>>
>> The test results came back.
>>
> I didn't see three dots after your post, so you've got me on pins and
> needles now.

They indicate that cyberc*nt needs a six-week course of antibiotics.

Bob

Blinky wrote:

>> One of the more notorious Usenet k00k/trolls believes that its
> movements are being tracked by Google Maps.
>
> I've seen him but can't remember the name/nym. Can you help me, here?

Message-ID:

"With Google maps, someone could track my every foot step"

Bob

Sqwertz wrote:

> Heck, Maybe OM will swing by and pick me up to go shopping this
> weekend... Maybe she can smack some sense into me with her whips
> and chains.


It's MY job to beat the living SHITE outta ya, Steve...remember that scene
in the pawn shop basement in _Pulp Fiction_...???


--
Best
Greg

" I find Greg Morrow lowbrow, witless, and obnoxious. For him to claim that
we are some
kind of comedy team turns my stomach."
- "cybercat" to me on rec.food.cooking

cybercat wrote:
> "bulka" > wrote in message
> ...
>> On Sep 5, 8:54 pm, "cybercat" > wrote:
>>> "Paul M. Cook" > wrote in
>>> ...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> "cybercat" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>> Because so many of you are so incredibly stupid and malicious on any
>>>>> given topic.
>>>>> Consider me converted.
>>>> The on topic posts get pretty malicious, too.
>>> That's true. But some of the political views that have come out in these
>>> latest threads have completely changed the way I think about a number of
>>> people who post here. While many would say that I do not suffer fools
>>> gladly, I now believe that I give people wayyyy too much credit. I must
>>> because I am continually surprised when they show their idiocy.
>> In defense of OTs
>>
>> Sure, we could take our political/social rants to a more appropriate
>> site, full of strangers. Here,we are at least aquaintences. We've
>> talked about soup and rice and dog nose what else. We have some
>> context (Even if, I confess, I can't always keep straight who said
>> what)
>>
>> Better spew from an idiot you sorta know than spew from a random,
>> annonymous idiot.
>>
>> Think globally, argue locally.
>>
>> And, we are generally polilte enough to make separate threads. Don't
>> read 'em if you don't want to.
>>
>
> You read me wrong. I don't hate the OT posts, I am disgusted with the
> idiots. Jay writes that "muslims are scary." Omelet writes that "affirmative
> action gets you a free education." George thinks Obama stands for power
> flowing from the goverment to the people and not the other way around.
> "Chatty Cathy" thinks you have to have borne a child to understand anything
> about children. The foam-flecked ****williger assumes that those who support
> Obama "get more from the system than they pay into it." And "Goomba," where
> to even begin? She thinks, among other unbelievably asinine things, that the
> girl's room and the boy's locker room count as sex education.
>
> Ob food, I'll have whatever these dickfaces are NOT having.
>
>
And there lies you problem. The other folks are discussing things and
exchanging ideas. You are using your self described education through
angry, rabid kneejerk responses. Someone could buy a preprogrammed toy
that mindlessly repeats lines and it would have as much of a chance of
convincing someone as you are.

Once you decide that everyone else is an idiot or a dickface you may
want to think what is wrong with your belief system.

Typically when you become the lone believer it is a good idea to
reconsider things.

"cyberCarp" wrote:
> >
> I don't hate the OT posts, I am disgusted with the
> idiots.
>
>
>
Jay writes that "muslims are scary." Omelet writes that "affirmative
> action gets you a free education." George thinks Obama stands for power
> flowing from the goverment to the people and not the other way around.
> "Chatty Cathy" thinks you have to have borne a child to understand anything
> about children. The foam-flecked ****williger assumes that those who support
> Obama "get more from the system than they pay into it." And "Goomba," where
> to even begin? She thinks, among other unbelievably asinine things, that the
> girl's room and the boy's locker room count as sex education.


Whew... CyberCarp, I was feeling miffed, until I realized I'm not one
of the idiots. <TeeHee>

carp...

: (CyberCarp) to find fault or complain querulously

: (OB food) a large variable Asian soft-finned freshwater cyprinid
fish (Cyprinus carpio) of sluggish waters that is often raised for
food and has been widely introduced into United States waters; also :
any of various related cyprinid fishes (as the grass carp)

: (if the foo shits) fruit <carpogonium>
---


http://www.epicurious.com/recipes/fo...LTE-FISH-40014

Actually that recipe is not accurate... real gefilte fish (*stuffed*
fish) necessitates that the seasoned fish mixture is stuffed back into
the fish skin, carefully sewn closed, then poached in pre-prepared
fish stock... eaten hot or cold... hot fish stock is delicious, cold
gelatinized fish stock is to die for. I'm possitive that very, VERY
few today have ever eaten real gefilte fish... copying jarred is NOT
gefilte fish. Oh, make sure the fish monger gives you the carp roe.

On Sep 6, 4:14�am, ChattyCathy > wrote:
> cybercat wrote:
>
> > You read me wrong. I don't hate the OT posts, I am disgusted with the
> > idiots. Jay writes that "muslims are scary." Omelet writes that
> > "affirmative action gets you a free education." George thinks Obama
> > stands for power flowing from the goverment to the people and not the
> > other way around. "Chatty Cathy" thinks you have to have borne a child
> > to understand anything about children. The foam-flecked ****williger
> > assumes that those who support Obama "get more from the system than
> > they pay into it." And "Goomba," where to even begin? She thinks,
> > among other unbelievably asinine things, that the girl's room and the
> > boy's locker room count as sex education.
>
> > Ob food, I'll have whatever these dickfaces are NOT having.
>
> Ah. You're gonna have take-out again, I see. Don't blame you - I
> wouldn't wanna eat your 'home cooking' either.
>
> BTW, that's *Mrs.* Dickface to you.

Hmm, I guess that makes it legal. hehehe

On Sep 5, 9:42�pm, Omelet > wrote:
> In article >,
>
>
>
>
>
> �"cybercat" > wrote:
> > "Paul M. Cook" > wrote in message
> ...
>
> > > "cybercat" > wrote in message
> > ...
> > >> Because so many of you are so incredibly stupid and malicious on any
> > >> given topic.
>
> > >> Consider me converted.
>
> > > The on topic posts get pretty malicious, too.
>
> > That's true. But some of the political views that have come out in these
> > latest threads have completely changed the way I think about a number of
> > people who post here. While many would say that I do not suffer fools
> > gladly, I now believe that I give people wayyyy too much credit. I must
> > because I am continually surprised when they show their idiocy.
>
> It kinda changed the way I thought about you too.
>
> I used to like you and think you were funny.
>
> Now I know you're just a, well, nevermind...

CyberInDisDress-incognito/CyberDisfunctional

On Sat, 06 Sep 2008 11:05:07 +0200, ChattyCathy
> wrote:

>sf wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 5 Sep 2008 20:54:23 -0400, "cybercat" >
>> wrote:
>>
>>>While many would say that I do not suffer fools
>>>gladly, I now believe that I give people wayyyy too much credit. I
>>>must because I am continually surprised when they show their idiocy.
>>>
>>
>> Not wanting to research every post to every thread... but wondering
>> what transpired that I've missed. It seems to me that posters have
>> stayed in line with their public persona. I haven't had any big
>> surprises lately.
>
>In a nutshell, some folks disagreed with cybercat in another thread
><gasp>, so now we're all 'dickheads' (as usual). Then, cybercat started
>this hissy-fit thread just because she can - again that's her usual
>style. So, yes, she stayed in line with *her* public persona, that's
>for sure.
>
>However, this is Usenet, and r.f.c. is an unmoderated group (thank
>heavens) so she can keep making a fool of herself for as long as she
>wishes, no skin off my nose.

Ah, business as usual. I see. Thanks!


--
I never worry about diets. The only carrots that interest me are the number of carats in a diamond.

Mae West

On Fri, 5 Sep 2008 19:17:13 -0700, Bob Terwilliger wrote:

> cyber**** wrote:
>
>> The foam-flecked ****williger assumes that those who support Obama "get
>> more from the system than they pay into it."
>
>
> I *will* say that people who leech off the system tend to favor the
> Democratic Party in general and Obama in particular. There are also
> perfectly respectable people who like Obama -- but you're not one of them.
>

and i would say that people who *steal* from the government - big time, not
just monthly cheese - tend to favor republicans.

blake

On Sat 06 Sep 2008 02:12:46a, Bob Terwilliger told us...

> sf wrote:
>
>>>> Not wanting to research every post to every thread... but wondering
>>>> what transpired that I've missed.
>>>
>>> The test results came back.
>>>
>> I didn't see three dots after your post, so you've got me on pins and
>> needles now.
>
> They indicate that cyberc*nt needs a six-week course of antibiotics.
>
> Bob
>

I must have misread that. I thought it was six months of intense
psychotherapy.

--
Wayne Boatwright

*******************************************
Date: Saturday, 09(IX)/06(VI)/08(MMVIII)
*******************************************
Countdown till Veteran's Day
9wks 2dys 15hrs 4mins
*******************************************
Oxymoron: Random Order.
*******************************************

On Sat 06 Sep 2008 06:31:26a, Gregory Morrow told us...

>
>
> Sqwertz wrote:
>
>> Heck, Maybe OM will swing by and pick me up to go shopping this
>> weekend... Maybe she can smack some sense into me with her whips
>> and chains.
>
>
> It's MY job to beat the living SHITE outta ya, Steve...remember that
> scene in the pawn shop basement in _Pulp Fiction_...???

Do a better job next time, Greg!

--
Wayne Boatwright

*******************************************
Date: Saturday, 09(IX)/06(VI)/08(MMVIII)
*******************************************
Countdown till Veteran's Day
9wks 2dys 15hrs
*******************************************
RENTAL CAR: The only *TRUE*
all-terrain vehicle.
*******************************************

Wayne Boatwright wrote:

> On Sat 06 Sep 2008 06:31:26a, Gregory Morrow told us...
>
> >
> >
> > Sqwertz wrote:
> >
> >> Heck, Maybe OM will swing by and pick me up to go shopping this
> >> weekend... Maybe she can smack some sense into me with her whips
> >> and chains.
> >
> >
> > It's MY job to beat the living SHITE outta ya, Steve...remember that
> > scene in the pawn shop basement in _Pulp Fiction_...???
>
> Do a better job next time, Greg!


Lol...

Actually, I'm presently savouring my "victory" in having my prayers answered
that a HURRICANE would pass over and DEMOLISH the cyberpussy's Evil L'il
Hut...

;-D


--
Best
Greg

" I find Greg Morrow lowbrow, witless, and obnoxious. For him to claim that
we are some
kind of comedy team turns my stomach."
- "cybercat" to me on rec.food.cooking

George wrote:

> cybercat wrote:
> > "bulka" > wrote in message
> >
...
> >> On Sep 5, 8:54 pm, "cybercat" > wrote:
> >>> "Paul M. Cook" > wrote in
> >>> ...
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> "cybercat" > wrote in message
> >>>> ...
> >>>>> Because so many of you are so incredibly stupid and malicious on any
> >>>>> given topic.
> >>>>> Consider me converted.
> >>>> The on topic posts get pretty malicious, too.
> >>> That's true. But some of the political views that have come out in
these
> >>> latest threads have completely changed the way I think about a number
of
> >>> people who post here. While many would say that I do not suffer fools
> >>> gladly, I now believe that I give people wayyyy too much credit. I
must
> >>> because I am continually surprised when they show their idiocy.
> >> In defense of OTs
> >>
> >> Sure, we could take our political/social rants to a more appropriate
> >> site, full of strangers. Here,we are at least aquaintences. We've
> >> talked about soup and rice and dog nose what else. We have some
> >> context (Even if, I confess, I can't always keep straight who said
> >> what)
> >>
> >> Better spew from an idiot you sorta know than spew from a random,
> >> annonymous idiot.
> >>
> >> Think globally, argue locally.
> >>
> >> And, we are generally polilte enough to make separate threads. Don't
> >> read 'em if you don't want to.
> >>
> >
> > You read me wrong. I don't hate the OT posts, I am disgusted with the
> > idiots. Jay writes that "muslims are scary." Omelet writes that
"affirmative
> > action gets you a free education." George thinks Obama stands for power
> > flowing from the goverment to the people and not the other way around.
> > "Chatty Cathy" thinks you have to have borne a child to understand
anything
> > about children. The foam-flecked ****williger assumes that those who
support
> > Obama "get more from the system than they pay into it." And "Goomba,"
where
> > to even begin? She thinks, among other unbelievably asinine things, that
the
> > girl's room and the boy's locker room count as sex education.
> >
> > Ob food, I'll have whatever these dickfaces are NOT having.
> >
> >
> And there lies you problem. The other folks are discussing things and
> exchanging ideas. You are using your self described education through
> angry, rabid kneejerk responses. Someone could buy a preprogrammed toy
> that mindlessly repeats lines and it would have as much of a chance of
> convincing someone as you are.
>
> Once you decide that everyone else is an idiot or a dickface you may
> want to think what is wrong with your belief system.
>
> Typically when you become the lone believer it is a good idea to
> reconsider things.


Yup...very well put. And the cyberangry would do well to remember the
example of a certain Martha Hughes who used to post here. This was her
*exact* MO - and as a result she was run right offa this group...the
cyberpuss is skirting with marginalising herself into extreme "obscurity".


--
Best
Greg

On Fri, 5 Sep 2008 22:29:39 -0400, "cybercat" >
wrote:

>
>"elaich" > wrote in message ...
>> ChattyCathy > wrote in news:g9rodf$g65$1
>> @registered.motzarella.org:
>>
>>> Hope you realize that people who have filtered out "OT" in the subject
>>> line probably won't even see your post.
>>
>> I'd say 90% of the posts in this group are OT, and are never marked as
>> such.
>
>And I really don't give a **** who sees my posts. I really don't.
>
I am so happy to see that you nave not lost the fine command of the
English language, that you have always had.

Paco > wrote:

> Cybercat: the Jerry Sauk of rec.food.cooking.

That's not fair. CC is much more educated and coherent than Jerry
could ever be.

Andy is as close as we get to Jerry Sauk in RFC.

ObFood: OnCor brand McRib sandwiches for lunch.

-sw

Yet another OT subject to killfile...

Enough is enough! I'm going to try to behave and post "on topic" for
awhile. I can get my fill of political stuff from the political lists!

Sheesh!

Figures Cyberpunk would criticize me for posting on one of these
threads, then start a new one herself. What a freakin' hypocrite.
--
Peace! Om

"If you don't read the newspaper you are uninformed; if you do read the newspaper you are misinformed." --Mark Twain

Bob Terwilliger wrote:

> Blinky wrote:
>
>>> One of the more notorious Usenet k00k/trolls believes that its
>> movements are being tracked by Google Maps.
>>
>> I've seen him but can't remember the name/nym. Can you help me, here?
>
> Message-ID:

That doesn't sound like the k00k I was thinking about. There must be more
than one. The one I was thinking about was more of a raver-loony.


--
Blinky
Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project: http://improve-usenet.org
Need a new news feed? http://blinkynet.net/comp/newfeed.html

"blake murphy" > wrote in message
.. .
> On Fri, 5 Sep 2008 19:17:13 -0700, Bob Terwilliger wrote:
>
>> cyber**** wrote:
>>
>>> The foam-flecked ****williger assumes that those who support Obama "get
>>> more from the system than they pay into it."
>>
>>
>> I *will* say that people who leech off the system tend to favor the
>> Democratic Party in general and Obama in particular. There are also
>> perfectly respectable people who like Obama -- but you're not one of
>> them.
>>
>
> and i would say that people who *steal* from the government - big time,
> not
> just monthly cheese - tend to favor republicans.
>

Yes, I think this is true.

"Saerah Gray" > wrote in message
02...
> "cybercat" > fnord
> :
>
>>
>> "elaich" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> ChattyCathy > wrote in news:g9rodf$g65$1
>>> @registered.motzarella.org:
>>>
>>>> Hope you realize that people who have filtered out "OT" in the
>>>> subject line probably won't even see your post.
>>>
>>> I'd say 90% of the posts in this group are OT, and are never marked
>>> as such.
>>
>> And I really don't give a **** who sees my posts. I really don't.
>>
>>
>>
>
> Sure you don't.
>
> --

Do you see me changing my email address to get past kill filters? Kill file
me. Please.

Pan wrote:

> On Fri, 5 Sep 2008 22:29:39 -0400, "cybercat" >
> wrote:
>
> >
> >"elaich" > wrote in message
...
> >> ChattyCathy > wrote in news:g9rodf$g65$1
> >> @registered.motzarella.org:
> >>
> >>> Hope you realize that people who have filtered out "OT" in the subject
> >>> line probably won't even see your post.
> >>
> >> I'd say 90% of the posts in this group are OT, and are never marked as
> >> such.
> >
> >And I really don't give a **** who sees my posts. I really don't.
> >
> I am so happy to see that you nave not lost the fine command of the
> English language, that you have always had.



"cybercat thinks she's quite the brain

When to tell the truth she's very insane

She's nutty as hell

And dumb as a bell

Reading her shit gives one a real pain..."


:-)

--
Best
Greg

"Sqwertz" > wrote in message
...
> Paco > wrote:
>
>> Cybercat: the Jerry Sauk of rec.food.cooking.
>
> That's not fair. CC is much more educated and coherent than Jerry
> could ever be.
>
> Andy is as close as we get to Jerry Sauk in RFC.
>
> ObFood: OnCor brand McRib sandwiches for lunch.
>
> -sw

I agree with you there, both have quite humorous meltdowns. But, I was
comparing the "there is only one point of view, mine, and you are wrong if
you disagree with me" attitudes that Jerry (R.I.P.) had and Cybercat now
has. And her current meltdown is a pretty good one too!

ObFood: Grilled burgers, ala TS Hanna.

"Sqwertz" > wrote in message
...
> Paco > wrote:
>
>> Cybercat: the Jerry Sauk of rec.food.cooking.
>
> That's not fair. CC is much more educated and coherent than Jerry
> could ever be.
>
> Andy is as close as we get to Jerry Sauk in RFC.
>
> ObFood: OnCor brand McRib sandwiches for lunch.
>
> -sw

Forgot to mention that Paul Cook should be chiming in about how you are
talking to yourself, as he(?) believes I'm you, or you're me or some such.
I think he "likes" you.

"Paco" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Sqwertz" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Paco > wrote:
>>
>>> Cybercat: the Jerry Sauk of rec.food.cooking.
>>
>> That's not fair. CC is much more educated and coherent than Jerry
>> could ever be.
>>
>> Andy is as close as we get to Jerry Sauk in RFC.
>>
>> ObFood: OnCor brand McRib sandwiches for lunch.
>>
>> -sw
>
> I agree with you there, both have quite humorous meltdowns. But, I was
> comparing the "there is only one point of view, mine, and you are wrong if
> you disagree with me" attitudes that Jerry (R.I.P.) had and Cybercat now
> has. And her current meltdown is a pretty good one too!
>

I am so glad you are enjoying my opinions. I think it's hilarious how
whenever I express an opinion with which you disagree, it is a "meltdown."
You can't counter with anything productive, so I'm melting down. I'm just a
puddle now. Asswipe.


** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **

"Paco" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Sqwertz" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Paco > wrote:
>>
>>> Cybercat: the Jerry Sauk of rec.food.cooking.
>>
>> That's not fair. CC is much more educated and coherent than Jerry
>> could ever be.
>>
>> Andy is as close as we get to Jerry Sauk in RFC.
>>
>> ObFood: OnCor brand McRib sandwiches for lunch.
>>
>> -sw
>
> Forgot to mention that Paul Cook should be chiming in about how you are
> talking to yourself, as he(?) believes I'm you, or you're me or some such.
> I think he "likes" you.

Do you think this passes for wit? A lame-assed attempt at condescension,
maybe.

cybercat wrote:

> "Paco" > wrote in message
> ...
> >
> > "Sqwertz" > wrote in message
> > ...
> >> Paco > wrote:
> >>
> >>> Cybercat: the Jerry Sauk of rec.food.cooking.
> >>
> >> That's not fair. CC is much more educated and coherent than Jerry
> >> could ever be.
> >>
> >> Andy is as close as we get to Jerry Sauk in RFC.
> >>
> >> ObFood: OnCor brand McRib sandwiches for lunch.
> >>
> >> -sw
> >
> > I agree with you there, both have quite humorous meltdowns. But, I was
> > comparing the "there is only one point of view, mine, and you are wrong
if
> > you disagree with me" attitudes that Jerry (R.I.P.) had and Cybercat
now
> > has. And her current meltdown is a pretty good one too!
> >
>
> I am so glad you are enjoying my opinions. I think it's hilarious how
> whenever I express an opinion with which you disagree, it is a "meltdown."
> You can't counter with anything productive, so I'm melting down. I'm just
a
> puddle now. Asswipe.


"Even her old buddy Steve now disdains her...puir l'il cyberflop - she is
"The Little Match Girl" of rfc..."

BWAHAHAAAAAAAAA.........!!!!!!!


--
Best
Greg

" I find Greg Morrow lowbrow, witless, and obnoxious. For him to claim that
we are some
kind of comedy team turns my stomach."
- "cybercat" to me on rec.food.cooking

On Sat, 6 Sep 2008 17:00:20 -0500, "Gregory Morrow"
> wrote:

>
>cybercat wrote:
>
>> "Paco" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> >
>> > "Sqwertz" > wrote in message
>> > ...
>> >> Paco > wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Cybercat: the Jerry Sauk of rec.food.cooking.
>> >>
>> >> That's not fair. CC is much more educated and coherent than Jerry
>> >> could ever be.
>> >>
>> >> Andy is as close as we get to Jerry Sauk in RFC.
>> >>
>> >> ObFood: OnCor brand McRib sandwiches for lunch.
>> >>
>> >> -sw
>> >
>> > I agree with you there, both have quite humorous meltdowns. But, I was
>> > comparing the "there is only one point of view, mine, and you are wrong
>if
>> > you disagree with me" attitudes that Jerry (R.I.P.) had and Cybercat
>now
>> > has. And her current meltdown is a pretty good one too!
>> >
>>
>> I am so glad you are enjoying my opinions. I think it's hilarious how
>> whenever I express an opinion with which you disagree, it is a "meltdown."
>> You can't counter with anything productive, so I'm melting down. I'm just
>a
>> puddle now. Asswipe.
>
>
>"Even her old buddy Steve now disdains her...

Were they ever buds? I didn't think so.


--
I never worry about diets. The only carrots that interest me are the number of carats in a diamond.

Mae West

"cybercat" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Paco" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>> "Sqwertz" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> Paco > wrote:
>>>
>>>> Cybercat: the Jerry Sauk of rec.food.cooking.
>>>
>>> That's not fair. CC is much more educated and coherent than Jerry
>>> could ever be.
>>>
>>> Andy is as close as we get to Jerry Sauk in RFC.
>>>
>>> ObFood: OnCor brand McRib sandwiches for lunch.
>>>
>>> -sw
>>
>> I agree with you there, both have quite humorous meltdowns. But, I was
>> comparing the "there is only one point of view, mine, and you are wrong
>> if you disagree with me" attitudes that Jerry (R.I.P.) had and Cybercat
>> now has. And her current meltdown is a pretty good one too!
>>
>
> I am so glad you are enjoying my opinions. I think it's hilarious how
> whenever I express an opinion with which you disagree, it is a "meltdown."
> You can't counter with anything productive, so I'm melting down. I'm just
> a puddle now. Asswipe.
>
> ** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **

What are you talking about? Who are you talking to? I haven't posted here
in months and don't recall previously disagreeing with you. But, thank you
for proving my point. <insert mandatory derogatory remark here>

P.S. I'm not Steve.

"Gregory Morrow" > wrote in message
...
>
> cybercat wrote:
>
>> "Paco" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> >
>> > "Sqwertz" > wrote in message
>> > ...
>> >> Paco > wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Cybercat: the Jerry Sauk of rec.food.cooking.
>> >>
>> >> That's not fair. CC is much more educated and coherent than Jerry
>> >> could ever be.
>> >>
>> >> Andy is as close as we get to Jerry Sauk in RFC.
>> >>
>> >> ObFood: OnCor brand McRib sandwiches for lunch.
>> >>
>> >> -sw
>> >
>> > I agree with you there, both have quite humorous meltdowns. But, I was
>> > comparing the "there is only one point of view, mine, and you are wrong
> if
>> > you disagree with me" attitudes that Jerry (R.I.P.) had and Cybercat
> now
>> > has. And her current meltdown is a pretty good one too!
>> >
>>
>> I am so glad you are enjoying my opinions. I think it's hilarious how
>> whenever I express an opinion with which you disagree, it is a
>> "meltdown."
>> You can't counter with anything productive, so I'm melting down. I'm just
> a
>> puddle now. Asswipe.
>
>
> "Even her old buddy Steve now disdains her...puir l'il cyberflop - she is
> "The Little Match Girl" of rfc..."
>
> BWAHAHAAAAAAAAA.........!!!!!!!
>
>
> --
> Best
> Greg

Not true, Greg. Steve actually defended her. I'm not Steve. (I'm starting
to develop an identity crisis)

Paco > wrote:

> P.S. I'm not Steve.

Yes you are. Some folks here believe I'm *everyone*.

Who *is* the real Steve? BWAHahahahahahaHAHAHAHAAAAAAA!

-sw

Paco > wrote:

> Forgot to mention that Paul Cook should be chiming in about how you are
> talking to yourself, as he(?) believes I'm you, or you're me or some such.
> I think he "likes" you.

Paul has called a bunch of people here 'Steve' at some point or
another.

Like Jerry, they see Steve around every corner and watch their every
step.

I control these people without any effort whatsoever.

-sw

blake wrote:

>> I *will* say that people who leech off the system tend to favor the
>> Democratic Party in general and Obama in particular. There are also
>> perfectly respectable people who like Obama -- but you're not one of
>> them.
>>
>
> and i would say that people who *steal* from the government - big time,
> not just monthly cheese - tend to favor republicans.


Point taken! Nutbars and leeches and thieves, oh my! What a great country,
eh?

Bob, 854 miles from the Canadian border

On Sat, 6 Sep 2008 17:46:57 -0400, "cybercat" >
wrote:


>I am so glad you are enjoying my opinions. I think it's hilarious how
>whenever I express an opinion with which you disagree, it is a "meltdown."
>You can't counter with anything productive, so I'm melting down. I'm just a
>puddle now. Asswipe.
>
>
>** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **

Perhaps if you were not so rude and crude, and respected other
opinions, your opinions would be better received or considered.