most excellently!

--
Saerah

"Welcome to Usenet, Biatch! Adapt or haul ass!"
- some hillbilly from FL

In article > ,
Saerah Gray > wrote:

> most excellently!

Yes indeed she does. Chris was very kind to me when I first started
posting here in, what was it Chris... 1994?

Miche

--
Electricians do it in three phases

"Michael \"Dog3\"" > fnord
:

> Miche > news:micheinnz-5BC573.22410806092008
> @news.itconsult.net: in rec.food.cooking
>
>> In article > ,
>> Saerah Gray > wrote:
>>
>>> most excellently!
>>
>> Yes indeed she does. Chris was very kind to me when I first started
>> posting here in, what was it Chris... 1994?
>
> Okay, what did I miss? I'm pretty busy these days and can't catch all
> the threads. Personally I think Dabney rocks too. But why the
> thread?

Do you have Andy and Steve Wertz blocked?

--
Saerah

"Welcome to Usenet, Biatch! Adapt or haul ass!"
- some hillbilly from FL

On Sat, 06 Sep 2008 12:48:38 GMT, Michael "Dog3" wrote:

> Miche > news:micheinnz-5BC573.22410806092008
> @news.itconsult.net: in rec.food.cooking
>
>> In article > ,
>> Saerah Gray > wrote:
>>
>>> most excellently!
>>
>> Yes indeed she does. Chris was very kind to me when I first started
>> posting here in, what was it Chris... 1994?
>
> Okay, what did I miss? I'm pretty busy these days and can't catch all the
> threads. Personally I think Dabney rocks too. But why the thread?
>
> Michael

your turn will come, michael. you did sign up, didn't you?

your pal,
blake

On Sep 6, 7:25*am, Saerah Gray > wrote:
> "Michael \"Dog3\"" > wrote:
> > Okay, what did I miss? *I'm pretty busy these days and can't catch all
> > the threads. *Personally I think Dabney rocks too. *But why the
> > thread?
>
> Do you have Andy and Steve Wertz blocked?
>
Is that a clue? What's the answer? -aem

aem > fnord news:c1e71a92-e055-4411-a6c2-
:

> On Sep 6, 7:25*am, Saerah Gray > wrote:
>> "Michael \"Dog3\"" > wrote:
>> > Okay, what did I miss? *I'm pretty busy these days and can't catch
al
> l
>> > the threads. *Personally I think Dabney rocks too. *But why the
>> > thread?
>>
>> Do you have Andy and Steve Wertz blocked?
>>
> Is that a clue? What's the answer? -aem
>

Andy started a thread titled "Christine D sucks"

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.f...ead/thread/848
0c71616f44b41#

--
Saerah

"Welcome to Usenet, Biatch! Adapt or haul ass!"
- some hillbilly from FL

On Sep 6, 10:30*am, Saerah Gray > wrote:
>
> Andy started a thread titled "Christine D sucks"
>
Oh. I skip his posts unless they're in the midst of a food-related
thread (which is rare). -aem

On Sat, 06 Sep 2008 22:41:08 +1200, Miche >
wrote:

>In article > ,
> Saerah Gray > wrote:
>
>> most excellently!
>
>Yes indeed she does. Chris was very kind to me when I first started
>posting here in, what was it Chris... 1994?
>
>Miche

Couldn't have been me, Miche. I barely started reading, much less
posting that year. I finally got up enough courage to post amongst
all the stellar folks that were posting then, like Susan, Mimi, the
Dans, Joel Erhlich, Andy P, Anne Bourget, and I forget a ton of
others. I was so overwhelmed.

It was a good year: I think that you, Modom and I started about that
time... I think Tammy Mc was already posting there.

Christine

Christine Dabney > wrote:

<snip>

So what did you do to **** Andy off?

Sqwertz wrote:
>
> Christine Dabney > wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
> So what did you do to **** Andy off?

She allowed her shadow to fall on him.

Or maybe she breathed the wrong way.

Either would be a major transgression
deserving of the most heinous punishment.

In the Andy Zone.

On Sat, 6 Sep 2008 18:19:08 -0500, Sqwertz >
wrote:

>Christine Dabney > wrote:
>
><snip>
>
>So what did you do to **** Andy off?

Sent you an email.

Christine

In article >,
Christine Dabney > wrote:

> On Sat, 06 Sep 2008 22:41:08 +1200, Miche >
> wrote:
>
> >In article > ,
> > Saerah Gray > wrote:
> >
> >> most excellently!
> >
> >Yes indeed she does. Chris was very kind to me when I first started
> >posting here in, what was it Chris... 1994?
> >
> >Miche
>
> Couldn't have been me, Miche. I barely started reading, much less
> posting that year. I finally got up enough courage to post amongst
> all the stellar folks that were posting then, like Susan, Mimi, the
> Dans, Joel Erhlich, Andy P, Anne Bourget, and I forget a ton of
> others. I was so overwhelmed.

Yeah, I can understand why. I do remember you from Thee Olden Dayes,
though.

> It was a good year: I think that you, Modom and I started about that
> time... I think Tammy Mc was already posting there.

Yep.

Miche

--
Electricians do it in three phases

Saerah Gray wrote:
> aem > fnord news:c1e71a92-e055-4411-a6c2-
> :
>
>> On Sep 6, 7:25 am, Saerah Gray > wrote:
>>> "Michael \"Dog3\"" > wrote:
>>>> Okay, what did I miss? I'm pretty busy these days and can't catch
> al
>> l
>>>> the threads. Personally I think Dabney rocks too. But why the
>>>> thread?
>>> Do you have Andy and Steve Wertz blocked?
>>>
>> Is that a clue? What's the answer? -aem
>>
>
> Andy started a thread titled "Christine D sucks"
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/rec.f...ead/thread/848
> 0c71616f44b41#
>
Oh? Why would I even bother to read such a thread? Sounds like
I'd see that header and kill it immediately--which is what I will
do in a moment, since it must be the next thread. (R,S)

--
Jean B.

Christine Dabney > wrote:

> On Sat, 6 Sep 2008 18:19:08 -0500, Sqwertz >
> wrote:
>
>>Christine Dabney > wrote:
>>
>><snip>
>>
>>So what did you do to **** Andy off?
>
> Sent you an email.

No shit?!? He took off all his clothes and started flapping his
little thing around? Somehow, that doesn't really surprise me.
No wonder why Stan didn't want to go out with him again.

-sw