"blake murphy" > wrote:>
> i *knew* it was easy to grasp!
>

Grasp *this*! Greggie says we're having sex, so I am entitled to some
foreplay!

sf wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Sep 2008 11:36:49 -0500, Omelet >
> wrote:
>>>
>>> Yup, for a little fun I'll morph to respond to the cybersnatch, Peterbreath
>>> Lucas and even blake once in a whiles, but I always sign my name and use my
>>> trademark 'cybercat' sig line. You'll know who I am...
>> Um, I DID sign it "Om"!
>
> but your headers were forged. Post as yourself or you'll get a bad
> rep.

And to think she spoke highly of your logic just the other day.

-sw

Omelet wrote:
> I'm not an ass hole. I'm just having fun... My way.
>
> And I'll get bored with fishing for Cybersnot after a few days.

What you are doing is nasty Om and I am surprised at you.

"Ophelia" > wrote in message
...
> Omelet wrote:
>> I'm not an ass hole. I'm just having fun... My way.
>>
>> And I'll get bored with fishing for Cybersnot after a few days.
>
> What you are doing is nasty Om and I am surprised at you.
>
>
It doesn't bother me, Ms. O.

On Fri, 26 Sep 2008 11:51:08 -0400, cybercat wrote:

> "blake murphy" > wrote:>
>> i *knew* it was easy to grasp!
>>
>
> Grasp *this*! Greggie says we're having sex, so I am entitled to some
> foreplay!

yes'm.

your pal,
blake

On Fri, 26 Sep 2008 17:45:00 +0200, ChattyCathy wrote:

> blake murphy wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 25 Sep 2008 20:55:27 -0700, sf wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 24 Sep 2008 20:48:29 -0500, Cybercat >
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>I only do that to people that mess with ME first.
>>>
>>> It's the mark of a bully and a coward, Om. Post using your own
>>> headers.
>>
>> i *knew* it was easy to grasp!
>>
>> your pal,
>> blake
>
> I wasn't going to 'perpetuate the drivel' here, but what the heck, this
> is Usenet.
>
> I've never seen the point of constant nym shifting. Some folks seem to
> find it amusing, I just think it's a waste of time because: Firstly, if
> I'm gonna argue with somebody, I like them to know I wrote the
> offending post without anybody having to scrutinize headers and/or
> scroll down to the end of the post to figure out who really wrote it.
> Secondly, if somebody has killfiled me, that's their choice, so I'm not
> going to waste my time (or theirs) by trying to bypass said kf's.

morrow and om think it's *cute* for some odd reason. of course morrow
almost has to do it if he wants anyone to read his inane posts.

your pal,
blake

On Fri, 26 Sep 2008 12:01:42 -0500, Sqwertz >
wrote:

>sf wrote:
>> On Tue, 23 Sep 2008 11:36:49 -0500, Omelet >
>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Yup, for a little fun I'll morph to respond to the cybersnatch, Peterbreath
>>>> Lucas and even blake once in a whiles, but I always sign my name and use my
>>>> trademark 'cybercat' sig line. You'll know who I am...
>>> Um, I DID sign it "Om"!
>>
>> but your headers were forged. Post as yourself or you'll get a bad
>> rep.
>
>And to think she spoke highly of your logic just the other day.
>
says a name shifting skank


--
I never worry about diets. The only carrots that interest me are the number of carats in a diamond.

Mae West