On Sun, 28 Sep 2008 11:55:03 +1000, "Kwyjibo"
> wrote:
>"Welsh Dog" > wrote in message
.. .
>> On Sun, 28 Sep 2008 10:43:07 +1000, "Kwyjibo"
>> > wrote:
>>>"Welsh Dog" > wrote in message
...
>>>> On Sun, 28 Sep 2008 00:44:13 +1000, "Kwyjibo"
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>"Welsh Dog" > wrote in message
om...
>>>>>> On Sat, 27 Sep 2008 03:26:07 +0000 (UTC), PeterLucas
>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>>"Dyna Soar" > wrote in
:
>>>>>>>> Welsh Dog wrote:

>>>> <snip>

>>>>>>>The posts by the likes up those 'fine, upstanding, e-citizens' that
>>>>>>>have
>>>>>>>participated in this (and other obsessive threads about me) really
>>>>>>>just
>>>>>>>goes to prove what infantile, pathetic, obsessed, little people they
>>>>>>>really are.

>>>>>> Coming from the scum sucking bottom feeder who called me a 'rock
>>>>>> spider' this is rich!!!

>>>>>Rich is it? He seems to have a point. He has barely posted here
>>>>>(ozdebate)
>>>>>in months yet useless ****wits like you and that other silly prick Jeßus
>>>>>continue to follow him around usenet like drooling teenage groupies.
>>>>>When
>>>>>he didn't repond you took to attacking those close to him.
>>>>>If that's not a good example of being an "infantile, pathetic, obsessed"
>>>>>little person, I'd be interested to hear what you think would make a
>>>>>better
>>>>>example you silly old dickhead.

>>>> Whatever.....

>>>LOL.
>>>What a useless old ****wit you turned out to be.

>> Ahh... was that an attempt at abuse.

>No. It was a statement of fact.

Yawn.......

... next.

Welshdog
--

News and views... for people like youse!!

Australian Opinion
(http://australianopinion.com)

Not as strange as it looks!

"Welsh Dog" > wrote in message
...
> On Sun, 28 Sep 2008 11:55:03 +1000, "Kwyjibo"
> > wrote:
>>"Welsh Dog" > wrote in message
. ..
>>> On Sun, 28 Sep 2008 10:43:07 +1000, "Kwyjibo"
>>> > wrote:
>>>>"Welsh Dog" > wrote in message
m...
>>>>> On Sun, 28 Sep 2008 00:44:13 +1000, "Kwyjibo"
>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>"Welsh Dog" > wrote in message
>>>>>>news:ga3sd45b3qiqajhq6nemjehhr1bfpmimkk@4ax. com...
>>>>>>> On Sat, 27 Sep 2008 03:26:07 +0000 (UTC), PeterLucas
>>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>>>"Dyna Soar" > wrote in
:
>>>>>>>>> Welsh Dog wrote:
>
>>>>> <snip>
>
>>>>>>>>The posts by the likes up those 'fine, upstanding, e-citizens' that
>>>>>>>>have
>>>>>>>>participated in this (and other obsessive threads about me) really
>>>>>>>>just
>>>>>>>>goes to prove what infantile, pathetic, obsessed, little people they
>>>>>>>>really are.
>
>>>>>>> Coming from the scum sucking bottom feeder who called me a 'rock
>>>>>>> spider' this is rich!!!
>
>>>>>>Rich is it? He seems to have a point. He has barely posted here
>>>>>>(ozdebate)
>>>>>>in months yet useless ****wits like you and that other silly prick
>>>>>>Jeßus
>>>>>>continue to follow him around usenet like drooling teenage groupies.
>>>>>>When
>>>>>>he didn't repond you took to attacking those close to him.
>>>>>>If that's not a good example of being an "infantile, pathetic,
>>>>>>obsessed"
>>>>>>little person, I'd be interested to hear what you think would make a
>>>>>>better
>>>>>>example you silly old dickhead.
>
>>>>> Whatever.....
>
>>>>LOL.
>>>>What a useless old ****wit you turned out to be.
>
>>> Ahh... was that an attempt at abuse.
>
>>No. It was a statement of fact.
>
> Yawn.......

What's the matter? Is it past bedtime at the retirement village?

--
Kwyj.

Welsh Dog wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Sep 2008 00:44:13 +1000, "Kwyjibo"
> > wrote:
>> "Welsh Dog" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> On Sat, 27 Sep 2008 03:26:07 +0000 (UTC), PeterLucas
>>> > wrote:
>>>> "Dyna Soar" > wrote in
>>>> :
>>>>> Welsh Dog wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
>>>> The posts by the likes up those 'fine, upstanding, e-citizens' that have
>>>> participated in this (and other obsessive threads about me) really just
>>>> goes to prove what infantile, pathetic, obsessed, little people they
>>>> really are.
>
>>> Coming from the scum sucking bottom feeder who called me a 'rock
>>> spider' this is rich!!!
>
>> Rich is it? He seems to have a point. He has barely posted here (ozdebate)
>> in months yet useless ****wits like you and that other silly prick Jeßus
>> continue to follow him around usenet like drooling teenage groupies.

LOL. And since when was lucas a regular on aus.cars?
Do you need reminding how and why he came to be posting there, hmm?

The only group I specifically went to because of lucas was his postnatal
stress syndrome group (or whatever the **** it is). And that was a
couple of years ago.

lucas willingly made his bed on here for years and was more than happy
to escalate things along - now he wants to cry "enough" and blames
others for not complying. Its a cyclical thing with him anyway - he's
done this before, he'll be actively taking the bait once again at some
point in the future. He always does

Welsh Dog wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Sep 2008 10:43:07 +1000, "Kwyjibo"
> > wrote:
>> "Welsh Dog" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> On Sun, 28 Sep 2008 00:44:13 +1000, "Kwyjibo"
>>> > wrote:
>>>> "Welsh Dog" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>> On Sat, 27 Sep 2008 03:26:07 +0000 (UTC), PeterLucas
>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>> "Dyna Soar" > wrote in
>>>>>> :
>>>>>>> Welsh Dog wrote:
>
>>> <snip>
>
>>>>>> The posts by the likes up those 'fine, upstanding, e-citizens' that have
>>>>>> participated in this (and other obsessive threads about me) really just
>>>>>> goes to prove what infantile, pathetic, obsessed, little people they
>>>>>> really are.
>
>>>>> Coming from the scum sucking bottom feeder who called me a 'rock
>>>>> spider' this is rich!!!
>
>>>> Rich is it? He seems to have a point. He has barely posted here (ozdebate)
>>>> in months yet useless ****wits like you and that other silly prick Jeßus
>>>> continue to follow him around usenet like drooling teenage groupies. When
>>>> he didn't repond you took to attacking those close to him.
>>>> If that's not a good example of being an "infantile, pathetic, obsessed"
>>>> little person, I'd be interested to hear what you think would make a
>>>> better
>>>> example you silly old dickhead.
>
>>> Whatever.....
>
>> LOL.
>> What a useless old ****wit you turned out to be.
>
> Ahh... was that an attempt at abuse. Sad you never learned how to dole
> it out properly??

Notice how familiar the 'insults' tend to be?
It can be hard to distinguish Kwyjibo from lucas at times

Kingpin wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Sep 2008 15:26:04 +0000 (UTC), PeterLucas
> wrote:
>
>> OS means overseas...... where we'll be at the end of the week.
>
> Fraser Island?

Nah.
Russell Island - to finish his community service.
http://mucus.notlong.com/

Talking about rubbishing Lucas OS, Ruth, I wonder if Lucas has rubbished
peoples partners in the ngs.

TimTim wrote:
> Talking about rubbishing Lucas OS, Ruth, I wonder if Lucas has rubbished
> peoples partners in the ngs.

Oh yeah... but that's okay if /he/ does it, apparently

On Mon, 29 Sep 2008 10:08:33 +1000, Jeßus >
wrote:
>Welsh Dog wrote:
>> On Sun, 28 Sep 2008 10:43:07 +1000, "Kwyjibo"
>> > wrote:
>>> "Welsh Dog" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> On Sun, 28 Sep 2008 00:44:13 +1000, "Kwyjibo"
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>> "Welsh Dog" > wrote in message
>>>>> ...
>>>>>> On Sat, 27 Sep 2008 03:26:07 +0000 (UTC), PeterLucas
>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>> "Dyna Soar" > wrote in
>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>> Welsh Dog wrote:

>>>> <snip>

>>>>>>> The posts by the likes up those 'fine, upstanding, e-citizens' that have
>>>>>>> participated in this (and other obsessive threads about me) really just
>>>>>>> goes to prove what infantile, pathetic, obsessed, little people they
>>>>>>> really are.

>>>>>> Coming from the scum sucking bottom feeder who called me a 'rock
>>>>>> spider' this is rich!!!

>>>>> Rich is it? He seems to have a point. He has barely posted here (ozdebate)
>>>>> in months yet useless ****wits like you and that other silly prick Jeßus
>>>>> continue to follow him around usenet like drooling teenage groupies. When
>>>>> he didn't repond you took to attacking those close to him.
>>>>> If that's not a good example of being an "infantile, pathetic, obsessed"
>>>>> little person, I'd be interested to hear what you think would make a
>>>>> better
>>>>> example you silly old dickhead.

>>>> Whatever.....

>>> LOL.
>>> What a useless old ****wit you turned out to be.

>> Ahh... was that an attempt at abuse. Sad you never learned how to dole
>> it out properly??

>Notice how familiar the 'insults' tend to be?
>It can be hard to distinguish Kwyjibo from lucas at times

Oh come on... even Kwyjibo has never sunk *quite* that low?? Has he?

Welshdog
--

News and views... for people like youse!!

Australian Opinion
(http://australianopinion.com)

Not as strange as it looks!

Welsh Dog wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Sep 2008 10:08:33 +1000, Jeßus >
> wrote:
>> Welsh Dog wrote:
>>> On Sun, 28 Sep 2008 10:43:07 +1000, "Kwyjibo"
>>> > wrote:
>>>> "Welsh Dog" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>> On Sun, 28 Sep 2008 00:44:13 +1000, "Kwyjibo"
>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>> "Welsh Dog" > wrote in message
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>> On Sat, 27 Sep 2008 03:26:07 +0000 (UTC), PeterLucas
>>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>>> "Dyna Soar" > wrote in
>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>> Welsh Dog wrote:
>
>>>>> <snip>
>
>>>>>>>> The posts by the likes up those 'fine, upstanding, e-citizens' that have
>>>>>>>> participated in this (and other obsessive threads about me) really just
>>>>>>>> goes to prove what infantile, pathetic, obsessed, little people they
>>>>>>>> really are.
>
>>>>>>> Coming from the scum sucking bottom feeder who called me a 'rock
>>>>>>> spider' this is rich!!!
>
>>>>>> Rich is it? He seems to have a point. He has barely posted here (ozdebate)
>>>>>> in months yet useless ****wits like you and that other silly prick Jeßus
>>>>>> continue to follow him around usenet like drooling teenage groupies. When
>>>>>> he didn't repond you took to attacking those close to him.
>>>>>> If that's not a good example of being an "infantile, pathetic, obsessed"
>>>>>> little person, I'd be interested to hear what you think would make a
>>>>>> better
>>>>>> example you silly old dickhead.
>
>>>>> Whatever.....
>
>>>> LOL.
>>>> What a useless old ****wit you turned out to be.
>
>>> Ahh... was that an attempt at abuse. Sad you never learned how to dole
>>> it out properly??
>
>> Notice how familiar the 'insults' tend to be?
>> It can be hard to distinguish Kwyjibo from lucas at times
>
> Oh come on... even Kwyjibo has never sunk *quite* that low?? Has he?

IMO he has quite frequently. Assuming his posts are archived, I'm sure I
could find some good fairly recent examples if you're really interested.
Otherwise I couldn't be arsed looking...

Then again - your reply could well be tongue in cheek...

"Jeßus" > wrote in message
...
> Welsh Dog wrote:
>> On Sun, 28 Sep 2008 00:44:13 +1000, "Kwyjibo"
>> > wrote:
>>> "Welsh Dog" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> On Sat, 27 Sep 2008 03:26:07 +0000 (UTC), PeterLucas
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>> "Dyna Soar" > wrote in
>>>>> :
>>>>>> Welsh Dog wrote:
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>>>>> The posts by the likes up those 'fine, upstanding, e-citizens' that
>>>>> have
>>>>> participated in this (and other obsessive threads about me) really
>>>>> just
>>>>> goes to prove what infantile, pathetic, obsessed, little people they
>>>>> really are.
>>
>>>> Coming from the scum sucking bottom feeder who called me a 'rock
>>>> spider' this is rich!!!
>>
>>> Rich is it? He seems to have a point. He has barely posted here
>>> (ozdebate) in months yet useless ****wits like you and that other silly
>>> prick Jeßus continue to follow him around usenet like drooling teenage
>>> groupies.
>
> LOL. And since when was lucas a regular on aus.cars?

Ummm. This thread wasn't posted to aus.cars (until now).

> Do you need reminding how and why he came to be posting there, hmm?

Not at all. I recall it quite clearly.
You attracted attention by making a complete ****wit of yourself,
threatening to track someone down and beat them up over a petty NG post -
Exactly the same act you've criticised PL for for the last couple of years,
you useless ****ing hypocrite.

"If ever find out who you are and where I can find you, you're in ****ing
deep shit. If think it's possible to meet up at some stage, I am more than
willing."

Sound familiar?
Strangly enough, you disappeared from aus.cars with your tail between your
legs not long after that post, following the ridicule you (rightly) received
from nearly everyone who posts to that newsgroup.

--
Kwyj.

Dyna Soar wrote:
> Jeßus wrote:
>> TimTim wrote:
>>> Talking about rubbishing Lucas OS, Ruth, I wonder if Lucas has
>>> rubbished peoples partners in the ngs.
>
>> Oh yeah... but that's okay if /he/ does it, apparently
>
> Bullshit, of course it isn't. Two wrongs don't make a right.

You do understand that I was being sarcastic?

> Whatever someone else may or may not have done about rubbishing another's
> partner is no justification, though, for Welsh Dog to carry on with his
> childish taunts at a female because of her choice of partner.

No arguments there. She is NOT lucas.

Kwyjibo wrote:
> "Jeßus" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Welsh Dog wrote:
>>> On Sun, 28 Sep 2008 00:44:13 +1000, "Kwyjibo"
>>> > wrote:
>>>> "Welsh Dog" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>> On Sat, 27 Sep 2008 03:26:07 +0000 (UTC), PeterLucas
>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>> "Dyna Soar" > wrote in
>>>>>> :
>>>>>>> Welsh Dog wrote:
>>> <snip>
>>>
>>>>>> The posts by the likes up those 'fine, upstanding, e-citizens' that
>>>>>> have
>>>>>> participated in this (and other obsessive threads about me) really
>>>>>> just
>>>>>> goes to prove what infantile, pathetic, obsessed, little people they
>>>>>> really are.
>>>>> Coming from the scum sucking bottom feeder who called me a 'rock
>>>>> spider' this is rich!!!
>>>> Rich is it? He seems to have a point. He has barely posted here
>>>> (ozdebate) in months yet useless ****wits like you and that other silly
>>>> prick Jeßus continue to follow him around usenet like drooling teenage
>>>> groupies.
>> LOL. And since when was lucas a regular on aus.cars?
>
> Ummm. This thread wasn't posted to aus.cars (until now).

As you well know, nobody said this thread was posted to aus.cars.

>> Do you need reminding how and why he came to be posting there, hmm?
>
> Not at all. I recall it quite clearly.
> You attracted attention by making a complete ****wit of yourself,
> threatening to track someone down and beat them up over a petty NG post -
> Exactly the same act you've criticised PL for for the last couple of years,
> you useless ****ing hypocrite.
>
> "If ever find out who you are and where I can find you, you're in ****ing
> deep shit. If think it's possible to meet up at some stage, I am more than
> willing."
>
> Sound familiar?

Yep, sure does. And then you pointed it out to your boyfriend (lucas),
who then posted to aus.cars for the first time in my recent memory.
Again, as you well know, this was the thread I was referring to.

> Strangly enough, you disappeared from aus.cars with your tail between your
> legs not long after that post,

Probably because I purchased a new property with no broadband access
until I got satellite broadband installed. Is that what you mean? LOL.

following the ridicule you (rightly) received
> from nearly everyone who posts to that newsgroup.

"nearly everyone"? I recall about a half dozen. I also recall some
notable absences who evidently preferred to steer clear.


I've always spoken my mind, irrespective of what other may think.
I see no point in going along with the crowd, merely to fit into a clique.
Kill files usually work well, anyone who has no wish to read my posts
should use it. And unlike lucas - I don't post endless crap that is
designed for nothing more than to impress.

"Jeßus" > wrote in message
...
> Kwyjibo wrote:
>> "Jeßus" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> Welsh Dog wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 28 Sep 2008 00:44:13 +1000, "Kwyjibo"
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>> "Welsh Dog" > wrote in message
>>>>> ...
>>>>>> On Sat, 27 Sep 2008 03:26:07 +0000 (UTC), PeterLucas
>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>> "Dyna Soar" > wrote in
>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>> Welsh Dog wrote:
>>>> <snip>
>>>>
>>>>>>> The posts by the likes up those 'fine, upstanding, e-citizens' that
>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>> participated in this (and other obsessive threads about me) really
>>>>>>> just
>>>>>>> goes to prove what infantile, pathetic, obsessed, little people they
>>>>>>> really are.
>>>>>> Coming from the scum sucking bottom feeder who called me a 'rock
>>>>>> spider' this is rich!!!
>>>>> Rich is it? He seems to have a point. He has barely posted here
>>>>> (ozdebate) in months yet useless ****wits like you and that other
>>>>> silly prick Jeßus continue to follow him around usenet like drooling
>>>>> teenage groupies.
>>> LOL. And since when was lucas a regular on aus.cars?
>>
>> Ummm. This thread wasn't posted to aus.cars (until now).
>
> As you well know, nobody said this thread was posted to aus.cars.

So, ****wit, why did you mention it when I made it quite clear I was
referring to your idiocy in ozdebate?

>
>>> Do you need reminding how and why he came to be posting there, hmm?
>>
>> Not at all. I recall it quite clearly.
>> You attracted attention by making a complete ****wit of yourself,
>> threatening to track someone down and beat them up over a petty NG post -
>> Exactly the same act you've criticised PL for for the last couple of
>> years, you useless ****ing hypocrite.
>>
>> "If ever find out who you are and where I can find you, you're in ****ing
>> deep shit. If think it's possible to meet up at some stage, I am more
>> than willing."
>>
>> Sound familiar?
>
> Yep, sure does. And then you pointed it out to your boyfriend (lucas),

Wrong.

> who then posted to aus.cars for the first time in my recent memory. Again,
> as you well know, this was the thread I was referring to.

Okay. So you do know it was the thread where you made an absolute ****ing
idiot of yourself and also proved what a mindless hypocrite you are.
Glad we've cleared that up.

>
>> Strangly enough, you disappeared from aus.cars with your tail between
>> your legs not long after that post,
>
> Probably because I purchased a new property with no broadband access until
> I got satellite broadband installed. Is that what you mean? LOL.

You think broadband is required to post to usenet? ****wit.

>
> following the ridicule you (rightly) received
>> from nearly everyone who posts to that newsgroup.
>
> "nearly everyone"? I recall about a half dozen.

Your 'recollection' is sadly lacking then.

> I also recall some notable absences who evidently preferred to steer
> clear.

Who? Ozone? Jonz? LOL.

>
> I've always spoken my mind,

That would almost be meaningful if you actually had a mind.......

--
Kwyj.

On Mon, 29 Sep 2008 12:37:04 +0800, "Dyna Soar"
> wrote:
>Jeßus wrote:
>> TimTim wrote:

>>> Talking about rubbishing Lucas OS, Ruth, I wonder if Lucas has
>>> rubbished peoples partners in the ngs.

>> Oh yeah... but that's okay if /he/ does it, apparently

>Bullshit, of course it isn't. Two wrongs don't make a right.
>Whatever someone else may or may not have done about rubbishing another's
>partner is no justification, though, for Welsh Dog to carry on with his
>childish taunts at a female because of her choice of partner.

Thing is see... I have *no* idea who this 'Ruth' is... or RMG or
whatever so I can really do without you pontificating at me if it's
all the same to you.

And I can remember many, many occasions when you have ripped into
anything and everything surrounding Mucus!! The fact you have a soft
spot for someone I've never heard of let alone discussed is immaterial
when discussing this idjit who has spent much of his (quasi) adult
life denigrating anything and everything you appear to hold sacred!!

I've made *one* comment, in jest about some female who you tell me is
beholden to him for rescuing her from a life of drudgery and then
berate me over is ignoring the wealth of evidence that can be found
about Mucus and his unbelievable tirades against everyone and
everybody else!!

Get a life Ray!!!

Welshdog
--

News and views... for people like youse!!

Australian Opinion
(http://australianopinion.com)

Not as strange as it looks!

On Tue, 30 Sep 2008 17:55:47 +0800, "Dyna Soar"
> wrote:
>Welsh Dog wrote:
>> On Mon, 29 Sep 2008 12:37:04 +0800, "Dyna Soar"
>> > wrote:
>>> Jeßus wrote:
>>>> TimTim wrote:

>>>>> Talking about rubbishing Lucas OS, Ruth, I wonder if Lucas has
>>>>> rubbished peoples partners in the ngs.

<snip>

>Oh, I'm mortified at that insult!

whatever.....

Welshdog
--

News and views... for people like youse!!

Australian Opinion
(http://australianopinion.com)

Not as strange as it looks!

On Sat, 27 Sep 2008 15:26:04 +0000, PeterLucas wrote:

> BTW..........

> To the dullard that started this thread.......

> OS means overseas......


And then on Sun, 28 Sep 2008 09:51:59 +1000, Kwyjibo wrote:

> People in glass houses ............


Hmmmmmm.............

On Sat, 27 Sep 2008 12:10:16 +0000, Horry wrote:

> On Sat, 27 Sep 2008 19:55:12 +0800, Dyna Soar wrote:
>
>> Welsh Dog wrote:
>>> On Sat, 27 Sep 2008 07:20:21 +0800, "Dyna Soar"
>>> > wrote:
>>>> Welsh Dog wrote:
>>
>>>>>> Is Peter Lucas' fiancee really AND truly the Ruth who used to post
>>>>>> to alt.ozdebate as 'RMG'?
>>
>>>>> She was... then her dog licence ran out and now she's in the pound.
>>
>>>> Far be it for me to defend Ruth, but Ruth is OK. As I understand it,
>>>> Lucas rescued her and her kids from an abusive relationship.
>>
>>>> To call her a dog, is beneath you, Chris..
>>
>>> English Proverb: "If you sup with the devil you need a long spoon"
>>
>>> Anyone who sups with the devil is fair game!?!?!
>>
>> Bullshit.
>>
>> You've deteriorated many magnitudes in my estimation, Chris.
>>
>> You're almost 61, acting like a little 12 yo child.
>>
>> I've had my run-ins with Ruth over the years, but I'd never call her a
>> dog because she feels a loyalty or whatever to a man who rescued her
>> and her kids from a dangerous situation.
>
> Rescued her or helped her? What did he actually do?
>
>
>> I'd tell you to grow up, but I guess it's too late for you to do that.
>
> While we're on the subject of "growing up", you've been giving me the
> silent treatment FOR WELL OVER TWO (2) YEARS because I accused you of
> using free lunches to win friends and influence people.

BUMP

"Horry" > wrote in message
...
> On Sat, 27 Sep 2008 15:26:04 +0000, PeterLucas wrote:
>
>> BTW..........
>
>> To the dullard that started this thread.......
>
>> OS means overseas......
>
>
> And then on Sun, 28 Sep 2008 09:51:59 +1000, Kwyjibo wrote:
>
>> People in glass houses ............
>
>
> Hmmmmmm.............

Hmmmmm what?

--
Kwyj.

"Horry" > wrote in message
...
> While we're on the subject of "growing up", you've been giving me the
> silent treatment FOR WELL OVER TWO (2) YEARS because I accused you of
> using free lunches to win friends and influence people.

How is something that's free going to win friends? If the lunch was free,
they could have got it anyway without having to dine with Dyna.

--
Kwyj.

On Tue, 30 Sep 2008 23:30:09 +1000, Kwyjibo wrote:

> "Horry" > wrote in message
> ...
>> On Sat, 27 Sep 2008 15:26:04 +0000, PeterLucas wrote:
>>
>>> BTW..........
>>
>>> To the dullard that started this thread.......
>>
>>> OS means overseas......
>>
>>
>> And then on Sun, 28 Sep 2008 09:51:59 +1000, Kwyjibo wrote:
>>
>>> People in glass houses ............
>>
>>
>> Hmmmmmm.............
>
> Hmmmmm what?

Harmonizing, dickhead.

"Horry" > wrote in message
...
> On Tue, 30 Sep 2008 23:30:09 +1000, Kwyjibo wrote:
>
>> "Horry" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> On Sat, 27 Sep 2008 15:26:04 +0000, PeterLucas wrote:
>>>
>>>> BTW..........
>>>
>>>> To the dullard that started this thread.......
>>>
>>>> OS means overseas......
>>>
>>>
>>> And then on Sun, 28 Sep 2008 09:51:59 +1000, Kwyjibo wrote:
>>>
>>>> People in glass houses ............
>>>
>>>
>>> Hmmmmmm.............
>>
>> Hmmmmm what?
>
> Harmonizing, dickhead.

What frequencies, cretin?

--
Kwyj.

On Tue, 30 Sep 2008 23:32:08 +1000, Kwyjibo wrote:

> "Horry" > wrote in message
> ...
>> While we're on the subject of "growing up", you've been giving me the
>> silent treatment FOR WELL OVER TWO (2) YEARS because I accused you of
>> using free lunches to win friends and influence people.
>
> How is something that's free going to win friends? If the lunch was
> free, they could have got it anyway without having to dine with Dyna.

My understanding is that the lunches were free for the targetted
potential friends only because Dyna paid for them. Of course, nothing in
life is free.................... and, as the recipients of those free
lunches were soon to discover, there were strings attached.

Kwyjibo wrote:
> "Jeßus" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Kwyjibo wrote:
>>> "Jeßus" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> Welsh Dog wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, 28 Sep 2008 00:44:13 +1000, "Kwyjibo"
>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>> "Welsh Dog" > wrote in message
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>> On Sat, 27 Sep 2008 03:26:07 +0000 (UTC), PeterLucas
>>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>>> "Dyna Soar" > wrote in
>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>> Welsh Dog wrote:
>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The posts by the likes up those 'fine, upstanding, e-citizens' that
>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>> participated in this (and other obsessive threads about me) really
>>>>>>>> just
>>>>>>>> goes to prove what infantile, pathetic, obsessed, little people they
>>>>>>>> really are.
>>>>>>> Coming from the scum sucking bottom feeder who called me a 'rock
>>>>>>> spider' this is rich!!!
>>>>>> Rich is it? He seems to have a point. He has barely posted here
>>>>>> (ozdebate) in months yet useless ****wits like you and that other
>>>>>> silly prick Jeßus continue to follow him around usenet like drooling
>>>>>> teenage groupies.
>>>> LOL. And since when was lucas a regular on aus.cars?
>>> Ummm. This thread wasn't posted to aus.cars (until now).
>> As you well know, nobody said this thread was posted to aus.cars.
>
> So, ****wit, why did you mention it when I made it quite clear I was
> referring to your idiocy in ozdebate?
>
>>>> Do you need reminding how and why he came to be posting there, hmm?
>>> Not at all. I recall it quite clearly.
>>> You attracted attention by making a complete ****wit of yourself,
>>> threatening to track someone down and beat them up over a petty NG post -
>>> Exactly the same act you've criticised PL for for the last couple of
>>> years, you useless ****ing hypocrite.
>>>
>>> "If ever find out who you are and where I can find you, you're in ****ing
>>> deep shit. If think it's possible to meet up at some stage, I am more
>>> than willing."
>>>
>>> Sound familiar?
>> Yep, sure does. And then you pointed it out to your boyfriend (lucas),
>
> Wrong.
>
>> who then posted to aus.cars for the first time in my recent memory. Again,
>> as you well know, this was the thread I was referring to.
>
> Okay. So you do know it was the thread where you made an absolute ****ing
> idiot of yourself and also proved what a mindless hypocrite you are.
> Glad we've cleared that up.

Ah. Now you've been reduced to inventing things. You know what that
means, right?


>>> Strangly enough, you disappeared from aus.cars with your tail between
>>> your legs not long after that post,
>> Probably because I purchased a new property with no broadband access until
>> I got satellite broadband installed. Is that what you mean? LOL.
>
> You think broadband is required to post to usenet? ****wit.

No wonder you 'think' the things you do if this is typical.
If you can be bothered with dialup - be my guest

>> following the ridicule you (rightly) received
>>> from nearly everyone who posts to that newsgroup.
>> "nearly everyone"? I recall about a half dozen.
>
> Your 'recollection' is sadly lacking then.
>
>> I also recall some notable absences who evidently preferred to steer
>> clear.
>
> Who? Ozone? Jonz? LOL.
>
>> I've always spoken my mind,
>
> That would almost be meaningful if you actually had a mind.......

LOL, somebody is upset. Not me

Kwyjibo wrote:
> "Horry" > wrote in message
> ...
>> On Tue, 30 Sep 2008 23:30:09 +1000, Kwyjibo wrote:
>>
>>> "Horry" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> On Sat, 27 Sep 2008 15:26:04 +0000, PeterLucas wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> BTW..........
>>>>> To the dullard that started this thread.......
>>>>> OS means overseas......
>>>>
>>>> And then on Sun, 28 Sep 2008 09:51:59 +1000, Kwyjibo wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> People in glass houses ............
>>>>
>>>> Hmmmmmm.............
>>> Hmmmmm what?
>> Harmonizing, dickhead.
>
> What frequencies, cretin?

Indeed you are.

Horry wrote:

> My understanding is that the lunches were free for the targetted
> potential friends only because Dyna paid for them. Of course, nothing in
> life is free.................... and, as the recipients of those free
> lunches were soon to discover, there were strings attached.

Ah, time shares - a bit like the mess you get once she pulls that string...

PeterLucas wrote:

> Stalking: Online Cyberstalking
>
>
> What kind of creature is a cyberstalker? What makes them tick? First
> and foremost they are bullies. Inadequate sexually and socially, they
> migrate towards the 'net, where they can enact their deepest fantasies
> of power and control.
>
> They range from the usual Wannabees to the sociopath-the most
> dangerous of all.

an apt description of your good self.

> According to BullyingOnline "Jealousy and envy motivate the bully to
> identify a competent and popular individual who is then controlled and
> subjugated through projection of the bully's own inadequacy and
> incompetence."

an apt description of your good self.

> When the target asserts their right not to be bullied, a paranoid fear
> of exposure compels the bully to perceive that person as a threat and
> hence neutralize and dispose of them as quickly as possible. Once a
> person has been eliminated there's an interval of between 2 days and 2
> weeks before the bully chooses another target and the cycle starts
> again".

an apt description of your good self. Who rails against people who don't use
their given name (on Usenet), yet constantly changes his own name and that
of his online persona?

> Totally lacking empathy or the ability to socialize within normal
> parameters, these individuals seek out people who appear to threaten
> their place in the order of things. Competent, capable people, people
> who refuse to be controlled or to compromise their integrity or system
> of ethics, become the subject of attack, until safely disposed of.
>
an apt description of your good self.

Who has, on many occasions, published the address and phone numbers of
others who post in this group? then I believe there is the matter of the
threats made to a female poster, whereby you were going to leave your
calling card in her front yard, of course you never did make good on that
threat nor the one to Mr Welch, nor many of the other many threats, you've
made.


> The serial stalker will often cover up or defend pedophilia, and may
> in fact be an active participant in such activities.


> They often have a back up string of carefully groomed females, who are
> so enamored of them, they would do anything to keep this controlling
> monsters approval. What is truly sad about this, is the offender
> doesn't even see these females as human. They are simply tools to
> carry out his infantile fantasies, and to act out revenge for
> imagined slights, on his behalf.

an apt description of your good self.
Who took an an AVO against his own wife? Who cultivated Loopy Linda?


> These things are important because online cyberstalking and bullying
> is increasing, and further, is grossly underreported.
>
> And if you want an idea of what your stalker is, and how he lives:
>
> --lives in a 1-room apartment which hasn't been cleaned for months -
> if ever
> --has stacks of pornographic magazines in his bedroom area
> --has poor personal hygiene
> --has poor table manners
> --has poor social etiquette
> --hasn't changed the sheets on his bed for months, which are now best
> described as crusty
> --has a bathroom, the state of which doesn't bear thinking about
> --lives on pizza and beer/coke, the remnants of which litter his
> apartment
> --may have an unusual pet (e.g. ferret) which has free run of the
> apartment
> --is either significantly over- or under-weight
> --has a small moustache or other facial hair
> --has not held down any job for more than a couple of years, probably
> less
> --has no friends
> --has no life outside the Internet
>
> Once you've established you've picked up a cyber stalker, contact your
> local police department,
>
>
>
> (Done already.)

Yes of course you have, we all remember the transcript from your AVO case
against Peter McKay...what a joke that was. Kept a lot of people laughing
for quite some weeks.

> Have ZERO contact. Do not react, simply document.

Sure, sure. Now I wonder if the boot was on the other foot, what
documentation some others may just have on your Usenet behaviour?

"Jeßus" > wrote in message
...
> Kwyjibo wrote:
>> "Jeßus" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> Kwyjibo wrote:
>>>> "Jeßus" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>> Welsh Dog wrote:
>>>>>> On Sun, 28 Sep 2008 00:44:13 +1000, "Kwyjibo"
>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>> "Welsh Dog" > wrote in message
>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>> On Sat, 27 Sep 2008 03:26:07 +0000 (UTC), PeterLucas
>>>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>>>> "Dyna Soar" > wrote in
>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>> Welsh Dog wrote:
>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The posts by the likes up those 'fine, upstanding, e-citizens'
>>>>>>>>> that have
>>>>>>>>> participated in this (and other obsessive threads about me) really
>>>>>>>>> just
>>>>>>>>> goes to prove what infantile, pathetic, obsessed, little people
>>>>>>>>> they
>>>>>>>>> really are.
>>>>>>>> Coming from the scum sucking bottom feeder who called me a 'rock
>>>>>>>> spider' this is rich!!!
>>>>>>> Rich is it? He seems to have a point. He has barely posted here
>>>>>>> (ozdebate) in months yet useless ****wits like you and that other
>>>>>>> silly prick Jeßus continue to follow him around usenet like drooling
>>>>>>> teenage groupies.
>>>>> LOL. And since when was lucas a regular on aus.cars?
>>>> Ummm. This thread wasn't posted to aus.cars (until now).
>>> As you well know, nobody said this thread was posted to aus.cars.
>>
>> So, ****wit, why did you mention it when I made it quite clear I was
>> referring to your idiocy in ozdebate?
>>
>>>>> Do you need reminding how and why he came to be posting there, hmm?
>>>> Not at all. I recall it quite clearly.
>>>> You attracted attention by making a complete ****wit of yourself,
>>>> threatening to track someone down and beat them up over a petty NG
>>>> post - Exactly the same act you've criticised PL for for the last
>>>> couple of years, you useless ****ing hypocrite.
>>>>
>>>> "If ever find out who you are and where I can find you, you're in
>>>> ****ing deep shit. If think it's possible to meet up at some stage, I
>>>> am more than willing."
>>>>
>>>> Sound familiar?
>>> Yep, sure does. And then you pointed it out to your boyfriend (lucas),
>>
>> Wrong.
>>
>>> who then posted to aus.cars for the first time in my recent memory.
>>> Again, as you well know, this was the thread I was referring to.
>>
>> Okay. So you do know it was the thread where you made an absolute ****ing
>> idiot of yourself and also proved what a mindless hypocrite you are.
>> Glad we've cleared that up.
>
> Ah. Now you've been reduced to inventing things.

Not even close.

> You know what that means, right?

Yep. You're not capable of realising how silly you made yourself look.

--
Kwyj.

"Horry" > wrote in message
...
> On Tue, 30 Sep 2008 23:32:08 +1000, Kwyjibo wrote:
>
>> "Horry" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> While we're on the subject of "growing up", you've been giving me the
>>> silent treatment FOR WELL OVER TWO (2) YEARS because I accused you of
>>> using free lunches to win friends and influence people.
>>
>> How is something that's free going to win friends? If the lunch was
>> free, they could have got it anyway without having to dine with Dyna.
>
> My understanding is that the lunches were free for the targetted
> potential friends only because Dyna paid for them.

If Dyna paid for them they clearly weren't free. If they were free *no one*
would have paid......

> Of course, nothing in life is free

Especially not in this case, as Dyna *PAID* for them.

> .................... and, as the recipients of those free
> lunches were soon to discover, there were strings attached.

A choking hazard?

--
Kwyj.

On Oct 1, 12:15*pm, "Kwyjibo" > wrote:
> "Horry" > wrote in message
>
> ...
>
> > On Tue, 30 Sep 2008 23:32:08 +1000, Kwyjibo wrote:
>
> >> "Horry" > wrote in message
> ...
> >>> While we're on the subject of "growing up", you've been giving me the
> >>> silent treatment FOR WELL OVER TWO (2) YEARS because I accused you of
> >>> using free lunches to win friends and influence people.
>
> >> How is something that's free going to win friends? If the lunch was
> >> free, they could have got it anyway without having to dine with Dyna.
>
> > My understanding is that the lunches were free for the targetted
> > potential friends only because Dyna paid for them.
>
> If Dyna paid for them they clearly weren't free. If they were free *no one*
> would have paid......
>
> > Of course, nothing in *life is free
>
> Especially not in this case, as Dyna *PAID* for them.
>
> > .................... and, as the recipients of those free
> > lunches were soon to discover, there were strings attached.
>
> A choking hazard?
>
> --
> Kwyj.

You his Melbourne mate who posted his phone number & gave his home
addresses from IP.
You sick prick!

On Oct 1, 10:41*am, Mick > wrote:
> On Oct 1, 12:15*pm, "Kwyjibo" > wrote:
>
>
>
> > "Horry" > wrote in message
>
> ...
>
> > > On Tue, 30 Sep 2008 23:32:08 +1000, Kwyjibo wrote:
>
> > >> "Horry" > wrote in message
> > ...
> > >>> While we're on the subject of "growing up", you've been giving me the
> > >>> silent treatment FOR WELL OVER TWO (2) YEARS because I accused you of
> > >>> using free lunches to win friends and influence people.
>
> > >> How is something that's free going to win friends? If the lunch was
> > >> free, they could have got it anyway without having to dine with Dyna..
>
> > > My understanding is that the lunches were free for the targetted
> > > potential friends only because Dyna paid for them.
>
> > If Dyna paid for them they clearly weren't free. If they were free *no one*
> > would have paid......
>
> > > Of course, nothing in *life is free
>
> > Especially not in this case, as Dyna *PAID* for them.
>
> > > .................... and, as the recipients of those free
> > > lunches were soon to discover, there were strings attached.
>
> > A choking hazard?
>
> > --
> > Kwyj.
>
> You his Melbourne mate who posted his phone number & gave his home
> addresses from IP.
> You sick prick!

BORING !

http://www.dangermouse.org/what.html

On Wed, 01 Oct 2008 12:15:11 +1000, Kwyjibo wrote:

> "Horry" > wrote in message
> ...
>> On Tue, 30 Sep 2008 23:32:08 +1000, Kwyjibo wrote:
>>
>>> "Horry" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> While we're on the subject of "growing up", you've been giving me the
>>>> silent treatment FOR WELL OVER TWO (2) YEARS because I accused you of
>>>> using free lunches to win friends and influence people.
>>>
>>> How is something that's free going to win friends? If the lunch was
>>> free, they could have got it anyway without having to dine with Dyna.
>>
>> My understanding is that the lunches were free for the targetted
>> potential friends only because Dyna paid for them.
>
> If Dyna paid for them they clearly weren't free. If they were free *no
> one* would have paid......

No. They were free for the targetted potential friends.

And even by your logic, if no-one at the table paid, the restaurant would
have paid. And if the lunches were free for the restaurant, then the
wholesaler/suppliers would have paid.


>> Of course, nothing in life is free
>
> Especially not in this case, as Dyna *PAID* for them.

They were free for the targetted potential friends. I never said they
were free for Dyna. Indeed, I have no doubt Dyna uses the monetary cost
of the lunches when he lays on the post-lunch friendship guilt trip.


>> .................... and, as the recipients of those free lunches were
>> soon to discover, there were strings attached.
>
> A choking hazard?

Even YOU (of all people) can do better than that.

*I* could do better than that, and I haven't been to bed for yesterday
yet.

On Wed, 01 Oct 2008 00:13:57 +1000, Kwyjibo wrote:

> "Horry" > wrote in message
> ...
>> On Tue, 30 Sep 2008 23:30:09 +1000, Kwyjibo wrote:
>>
>>> "Horry" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> On Sat, 27 Sep 2008 15:26:04 +0000, PeterLucas wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> BTW..........
>>>>
>>>>> To the dullard that started this thread.......
>>>>
>>>>> OS means overseas......
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> And then on Sun, 28 Sep 2008 09:51:59 +1000, Kwyjibo wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> People in glass houses ............
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hmmmmmm.............
>>>
>>> Hmmmmm what?
>>
>> Harmonizing, dickhead.
>
> What frequencies, cretin?

It's Kenneth, ******.

On Wed, 01 Oct 2008 03:09:49 +0000, Horry wrote:

> On Wed, 01 Oct 2008 00:13:57 +1000, Kwyjibo wrote:
>
>> "Horry" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> On Tue, 30 Sep 2008 23:30:09 +1000, Kwyjibo wrote:
>>>
>>>> "Horry" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>> On Sat, 27 Sep 2008 15:26:04 +0000, PeterLucas wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> BTW..........
>>>>>
>>>>>> To the dullard that started this thread.......
>>>>>
>>>>>> OS means overseas......
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> And then on Sun, 28 Sep 2008 09:51:59 +1000, Kwyjibo wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> People in glass houses ............
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hmmmmmm.............
>>>>
>>>> Hmmmmm what?
>>>
>>> Harmonizing, dickhead.
>>
>> What frequencies, cretin?
>
> It's Kenneth, ******.

Where *IS* Phoenix, anyways?

PeterLucas wrote:

<snip>

> Stalking: Online Cyberstalking

<snip new benchmark in hypocrisy>

> Once you've established you've picked up a cyber stalker, contact your
> local police department,

"It's the frauds and liars that always complain, bleat, and cry the most
when confronted with the truth. "

> (Done already.)

Yeah - right! LOL.

> Have ZERO contact.

"Soon as that gutless **** Hey-Zeus decides to show what a real man it
is(or whatever passes for a 'man' in it's *** community), and meet for a
face to face....... I'll be happy, and leave all the other faceless
clowns to their own devices"

"I only came into this group because I got a heads up on that slug Hey-
zeus. Seems it's up to it's usual tricks, and living down in Tassie.
Which is where I'll be in August.
I'm willing to travel to *wherever* it lives, for a face to face"

"I've done everything I want to in my life........ smacking the shit out
of some pathetic Internet fraud would bring me a modicum of joy"

LOL!
Poor mucus. First he CLAIMS to be a super-duper-mega-tough SAS style
secret agent who can disembowel a man using just his ear lobe - but his
ACTIONS (i.e runs to the police/court) tell a very different story! ROFL!!


> Do not react, simply document.

What a complete waste of time that would be.
For starters, you have no idea what my I.P is (as with many others here)
- you have no way to distinguish between any fake and real posts
purporting to be from a given user - let alone obtaining actual, usable
proof... but *please do* waste your time

Still, its hell funny to see you say that, given your own very notable
history in Usenet archives, LOL!

Here's another recent gem:

"I was stalked for a loooooooong time by some queer **** from Canberra"

For peter 'run-and-cry-for-help' lucas, anyone who show contempt for him
= "stalker"

"3 court cases later...... the pathetic shit has disappeared..... last
heard of, it was working as a taxi driver in Canberra"

So... the 'big man' (who has changed his name multiple times by deed
poll) to 'peter lucas' has for years gibbered on about 'being a man' and
'standing up for yourself' etc. etc. couldnt cope with McKay (sp) and
took him to court for some 'nasty words'. LOL.
Kinda contradicts your tough-guy image no?

Then theres the 'stalking' bullshit you constantly dribble about -
despite the fact that every one of your 'enemies' who has supplied
sufficient info about their location ends up getting threatened that
you're gonna 'get' them!

You even tried it on me, even though you decided I lived in "Woolingong"
LOL...


"I hate frauds, I hate liars"

Man, you're /such/ good value mucus - please don't ever change

Maroochy wrote:
> PeterLucas wrote:
>> Stalking: Online Cyberstalking
>> What kind of creature is a cyberstalker?

<snip>

> an apt description of your good self.
>
> Who has, on many occasions, published the address and phone numbers of
> others who post in this group? then I believe there is the matter of the
> threats made to a female poster, whereby you were going to leave your
> calling card in her front yard, of course you never did make good on that
> threat nor the one to Mr Welch, nor many of the other many threats, you've
> made.

I've not yet heard of even a single time when he made good on his
threats - threats which he's conveniently forgotten about, apparently

> Who took an an AVO against his own wife?
> Who cultivated Loopy Linda?

Indeed.

<snip>

>> Once you've established you've picked up a cyber stalker, contact your
>> local police department,
>>
>> (Done already.)
>
> Yes of course you have, we all remember the transcript from your AVO case
> against Peter McKay...what a joke that was. Kept a lot of people laughing
> for quite some weeks.

The mind boggles at what exactly he could possibly tell the police about
which they'd have the slightest interest in... Hopefully he really *is*
doing it - eventually (if not already) they will treat him as nothing
more than a pest.

>> Have ZERO contact. Do not react, simply document.
>
> Sure, sure.

His actions betray that silly little claim. And then some...

Kwyjibo wrote:
> "Jeßus" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Kwyjibo wrote:
>>> "Jeßus" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> Kwyjibo wrote:
>>>>> "Jeßus" > wrote in message
>>>>> ...
>>>>>> Welsh Dog wrote:
>>>>>>> On Sun, 28 Sep 2008 00:44:13 +1000, "Kwyjibo"
>>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>>> "Welsh Dog" > wrote in message
>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 27 Sep 2008 03:26:07 +0000 (UTC), PeterLucas
>>>>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> "Dyna Soar" > wrote in
>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>> Welsh Dog wrote:
>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The posts by the likes up those 'fine, upstanding, e-citizens'
>>>>>>>>>> that have
>>>>>>>>>> participated in this (and other obsessive threads about me) really
>>>>>>>>>> just
>>>>>>>>>> goes to prove what infantile, pathetic, obsessed, little people
>>>>>>>>>> they
>>>>>>>>>> really are.
>>>>>>>>> Coming from the scum sucking bottom feeder who called me a 'rock
>>>>>>>>> spider' this is rich!!!
>>>>>>>> Rich is it? He seems to have a point. He has barely posted here
>>>>>>>> (ozdebate) in months yet useless ****wits like you and that other
>>>>>>>> silly prick Jeßus continue to follow him around usenet like drooling
>>>>>>>> teenage groupies.
>>>>>> LOL. And since when was lucas a regular on aus.cars?
>>>>> Ummm. This thread wasn't posted to aus.cars (until now).
>>>> As you well know, nobody said this thread was posted to aus.cars.
>>> So, ****wit, why did you mention it when I made it quite clear I was
>>> referring to your idiocy in ozdebate?
>>>
>>>>>> Do you need reminding how and why he came to be posting there, hmm?
>>>>> Not at all. I recall it quite clearly.
>>>>> You attracted attention by making a complete ****wit of yourself,
>>>>> threatening to track someone down and beat them up over a petty NG
>>>>> post - Exactly the same act you've criticised PL for for the last
>>>>> couple of years, you useless ****ing hypocrite.
>>>>>
>>>>> "If ever find out who you are and where I can find you, you're in
>>>>> ****ing deep shit. If think it's possible to meet up at some stage, I
>>>>> am more than willing."
>>>>>
>>>>> Sound familiar?
>>>> Yep, sure does. And then you pointed it out to your boyfriend (lucas),
>>> Wrong.
>>>
>>>> who then posted to aus.cars for the first time in my recent memory.
>>>> Again, as you well know, this was the thread I was referring to.
>>> Okay. So you do know it was the thread where you made an absolute ****ing
>>> idiot of yourself and also proved what a mindless hypocrite you are.
>>> Glad we've cleared that up.
>> Ah. Now you've been reduced to inventing things.
>
> Not even close.
>
>> You know what that means, right?
>
> Yep. You're not capable of realising how silly you made yourself look.

I really hope for your sake you're not putting any effort into these
lame replies. You're boring the hell outta me now.

Anyway - what're you gonna do while your man is away overseas
(presumably still receiving centrelink payments)?

"Mick" > wrote in message
...

> You his Melbourne mate who posted his phone number & gave his home
> addresses from IP.

Try posting that again - In English this time.

> You sick prick!

Try one of these - http://tinyurl.com/53qvwo . It might help with your
problems.

--
Kwyj.

PeterLucas wrote:

> **************************************
> According to BullyingOnline "Jealousy and envy motivate the bully to
> identify a competent and popular individual who is then controlled and
> subjugated through projection of the bully's own inadequacy and
> incompetence."
>
>
> When the target asserts their right not to be bullied, a paranoid fear
> of exposure compels the bully to perceive that person as a threat and
> hence neutralize and dispose of them as quickly as possible. Once a
> person has been eliminated there's an interval of between 2 days and 2
> weeks before the bully chooses another target and the cycle starts
> again".
>
> Totally lacking empathy or the ability to socialize within normal
> parameters, these individuals seek out people who appear to threaten
> their place in the order of things. Competent, capable people, people
> who refuse to be controlled or to compromise their integrity or system
> of ethics, become the subject of attack, until safely disposed of.
>
>
>
>
> The serial stalker will often cover up or defend pedophilia, and may in
> fact be an active participant in such activities.
>
> ************************************************
>
>
> (Sounds like welch mutt.)
>
>
>
> ************************************************
> These things are important because online cyberstalking and bullying is
> increasing, and further, is grossly underreported.
>
> And if you want an idea of what your stalker is, and how he lives:
>
> --lives in a 1-room apartment which hasn't been cleaned for months - if
> ever
> --has stacks of pornographic magazines in his bedroom area
> --has poor personal hygiene
> --has poor table manners
> --has poor social etiquette
> --hasn't changed the sheets on his bed for months, which are now best
> described as crusty
> --has a bathroom, the state of which doesn't bear thinking about
> --lives on pizza and beer/coke, the remnants of which litter his
> apartment
> --may have an unusual pet (e.g. ferret) which has free run of the
> apartment
> --is either significantly over- or under-weight
> --has a small moustache or other facial hair
> --has not held down any job for more than a couple of years, probably
> less
> --has no friends
> --has no life outside the Internet
> ************************************************** *
>
>
> Sounds like kirkland....... hey-zeus...... welch dog....... hag
> harris..... and their two newest mentally ill compadres......
> 3dogs****ing, and morrow the moron.
>
> 3dogs is continually ridiculed in other groups because it *always* makes
> a point of telling people that it's in phone contact with certain
> people........ and stresses right out on the ng's when those people
> don't answer their phones to it.
>
> And moron morrow........ ozdebate *deserves* the likes of that.
>
> It'll fit right in.


Of course you don't understand that we are not "jealous" or "envious" of
you, but that we are *mocking* you...

Lol...



--
Best
Greg

" I find Greg Morrow lowbrow, witless, and obnoxious. For him to claim that
we are some
kind of comedy team turns my stomach."
- "cybercat" to me on rec.food.cooking