"Dan Abel" > wrote in message
...
> In article >,
> "Paul M. Cook" > wrote:
>
>> "blake murphy" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> > On Sun, 12 Oct 2008 00:22:09 -0700, Paul M. Cook wrote:
>
>> >> I can. Always good advice, eschew asparagus if out on a promising
>> >> date.
>
>> > must be a *really* good date if she can smell your pee.
>
>> I have to explain everything. Oral sex. OK, oral sex. And in case you
>> have not figured it out yet, one can give it as well as receieve it. Not
>> everyone owns a hot tub.
>
> I'm afraid you are going to have to explain this one, Paul. I just
> don't understand. Are you saying that your idea of oral sex involves
> somebody peeing in somebody else's mouth?
>

No, you dirty minded pervert. Lingering odor. Asparagus is notorious for
that. If you've never had asparagus pee you know it smells like skunk and
it has a long lasting smell even after flushing. It can hang in the air for
hours and on your skin as well.

> And the reference to a hot tub doesn't make any sense at all to me.
> What does that have to do with either oral sex or peeing?
>

Hot tub = bath. As in washing away the foul odor without having to excuse
yourself to shower.

Anything else I can explain about being considerate ona date and not eating
asparaguis if you think you'll get lucky? I mean I can paint a picture, use
colored crayons, perhaps even write a small thesis if it will help.

Paul

On Mon, 13 Oct 2008 19:51:14 -0500, Sqwertz wrote in post :
> :

> "Tim C." > wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 13 Oct 2008 05:08:15 -0500, Sqwertz wrote in post :
>> > :
>>
>>> "Tim C." > wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sun, 12 Oct 2008 06:07:45 -0500, Sqwertz wrote in post :
>>>> > :
>>>>
>>>>>> Might make an interesting poll.
>>>>>
>>>>> It was a poll on 3/12/2008.
>>>>
>>>> Can you see into the future or something?
>>>
>>> Hello?! Do you know today's date? Do you know where you are? Can
>>> you tell us who's the president of the United States?
>>>
>>> -sw
>>
>> Hello, nice to meet you.
>> 13th October 2008. 13/10/2008
>> uk.food+drink.misc
>> Some power-crazed monkey.
>
> Oh, you were trying to be cute by implying that RFC should adopt
> the Europeeing date format.
>
> How quaint.
>
> -sw

Quite quaint.
No, I was trying to imply that one should post UK format dates to a UK
group.

--
Tim C.

On Mon, 13 Oct 2008 15:12:48 GMT, blake murphy wrote in post :
> :

> On Mon, 13 Oct 2008 13:38:51 +0200, Waldo Centini wrote:
>
>> Op Mon, 13 Oct 2008 13:23:07 +0200 Joe Kotroczo illuminated the masses
>> with this:
>>
>>>>> It was a poll on 3/12/2008.
>>>>
>>>> Can you see into the future or something?
>>>
>>> Must be a 'mercan if he writes the date the wrong way around. Probably meant
>>> 12/03/2008.
>>
>> We always remember nine-eleven in november.
>
> it's better that way. you can take advantage of the sales.
>
> your pal,
> blake

You mean the cheap, bulk, twisted iron girders and concrete rubble for
land-fill?
--
Tim C.

On Mon, 13 Oct 2008 19:55:32 -0500, Sqwertz wrote in post :
> :

> Waldo Centini > wrote:
>
>> Op Mon, 13 Oct 2008 13:23:07 +0200 Joe Kotroczo illuminated the masses
>> with this:
>>
>>>>> It was a poll on 3/12/2008.
>>>>
>>>> Can you see into the future or something?
>>>
>>> Must be a 'mercan if he writes the date the wrong way around. Probably meant
>>> 12/03/2008.
>>
>> We always remember nine-eleven in november.
>
> And they bombed the London underground on 7/7/2005 just so y'all
> wouldn't get confused.
>
> -sw

Terrorists are human too.
--
Tim C.

Paco wrote:
> "Ophelia" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Paco wrote:
>>> "Corey Richardson" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> On Sun, 12 Oct 2008 06:07:45 -0500, Sqwertz
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> We certainly can't expect our pet troll Cory to know this since he
>>>>> only reads his own posts.
>>>>
>>>> Another couple of lies from you.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Could Corey be a relative of Jerry's from "across the pond"? Sure
>>> sounds like some kind of deep-seated, parallel genetic coding.
>>
>> Oi! Don't you lump him in with us! Bleh!
>>
>
> Sorry, but Corey is one of "yours". But, in the interest of
> international equality, we'll keep Jerry. That is a major concession
> and sacrifice in the name of world peace. You're welcome. ;-)

Awwwwww can I not tempt you to keep them together - on your side? Your side
is much bigger yannow

On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 08:47:24 +0200, Tim C. wrote:

> On Mon, 13 Oct 2008 15:12:48 GMT, blake murphy wrote in post :
> > :
>
>> On Mon, 13 Oct 2008 13:38:51 +0200, Waldo Centini wrote:
>>
>>> Op Mon, 13 Oct 2008 13:23:07 +0200 Joe Kotroczo illuminated the masses
>>> with this:
>>>
>>>>>> It was a poll on 3/12/2008.
>>>>>
>>>>> Can you see into the future or something?
>>>>
>>>> Must be a 'mercan if he writes the date the wrong way around. Probably meant
>>>> 12/03/2008.
>>>
>>> We always remember nine-eleven in november.
>>
>> it's better that way. you can take advantage of the sales.
>>
>> your pal,
>> blake
>
> You mean the cheap, bulk, twisted iron girders and concrete rubble for
> land-fill?

xenophobic hysteria is even cheaper after the holiday.

your pal,
blake

On Mon, 13 Oct 2008 19:47:46 -0500, Sqwertz wrote:

> DK > wrote:
>
>> Corey Richardson wrote:
>>> On Sun, 12 Oct 2008 22:09:22 -0400, "Paco" >
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> "Corey Richardson" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>> On Sun, 12 Oct 2008 06:07:45 -0500, Sqwertz >
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> We certainly can't expect our pet troll Cory to know this since he
>>>>>> only reads his own posts.
>>>>> Another couple of lies from you.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Could Corey be a relative of Jerry's from "across the pond"? Sure sounds
>>>> like some kind of deep-seated, parallel genetic coding.
>>>>
>>>> -sw
>>>
>>> I see you've changed your posting name again. Why?
>>>
>>
>> The shadow knows...
>>
>> -sw
>
> Hey - can I get in on this, too?
>
> -sw
>
> -sw
>
> -sw

o.k., i *know* you forged this one.

your pal,
blake

In article >,
"Paul M. Cook" > wrote:

> Hot tub = bath. As in washing away the foul odor without having to excuse
> yourself to shower.
>
> Anything else I can explain about being considerate ona date and not eating
> asparaguis if you think you'll get lucky? I mean I can paint a picture, use
> colored crayons, perhaps even write a small thesis if it will help.
>
> Paul

Anyone that does not bathe prior to oral sex is just gross. Showering
together is great foreplay imho. ;-)
--
Peace! Om

"He who has the gold makes the rules"
--Om

"He who has the guns can get the gold."
-- Steve Rothstein

In article >,
"Tim C." > wrote:

> On Mon, 13 Oct 2008 19:55:32 -0500, Sqwertz wrote in post :
> > :
>
> > Waldo Centini > wrote:
> >
> >> Op Mon, 13 Oct 2008 13:23:07 +0200 Joe Kotroczo illuminated the masses
> >> with this:
> >>
> >>>>> It was a poll on 3/12/2008.
> >>>>
> >>>> Can you see into the future or something?
> >>>
> >>> Must be a 'mercan if he writes the date the wrong way around. Probably
> >>> meant
> >>> 12/03/2008.
> >>
> >> We always remember nine-eleven in november.
> >
> > And they bombed the London underground on 7/7/2005 just so y'all
> > wouldn't get confused.
> >
> > -sw
>
> Terrorists are human too.

No, they are NOT.
--
Peace! Om

"He who has the gold makes the rules"
--Om

"He who has the guns can get the gold."
-- Steve Rothstein

In article >,
Waldo Centini > wrote:

> Op Tue, 14 Oct 2008 10:27:34 -0500 Omelet illuminated the masses with
> this:
>
> >> Terrorists are human too.
> >
> > No, they are NOT.
>
> Then what are they? Animal, vegetable or mineral, gi's a clue!

Sub-human.

The dregs of civilized society.
--
Peace! Om

"He who has the gold makes the rules"
--Om

"He who has the guns can get the gold."
-- Steve Rothstein

In article >,
"Paul M. Cook" > wrote:

> "Dan Abel" > wrote in message

> > I'm afraid you are going to have to explain this one, Paul. I just
> > don't understand. Are you saying that your idea of oral sex involves
> > somebody peeing in somebody else's mouth?
> >
>
> No, you dirty minded pervert. Lingering odor. Asparagus is notorious for
> that. If you've never had asparagus pee you know it smells like skunk and
> it has a long lasting smell even after flushing. It can hang in the air for
> hours and on your skin as well.

Neither my wife nor I have very sensitive noses. It doesn't smell like
skunk at all to me. There is no lingering odor for me. Once I flush
and open the door, the smell is completely gone. I've never noticed any
odor on any kind of skin.

> > And the reference to a hot tub doesn't make any sense at all to me.
> > What does that have to do with either oral sex or peeing?

> Hot tub = bath. As in washing away the foul odor without having to excuse
> yourself to shower.

See above.

> Anything else I can explain about being considerate ona date and not eating
> asparaguis if you think you'll get lucky? I mean I can paint a picture, use
> colored crayons, perhaps even write a small thesis if it will help.

My wife and I have been married for 36 years. There's no concept of
dating.

We eat asparagus whenever we want to (and the it is in season, so the
price is reasonable). In fact much of the asparagus is grown within 100
miles of us, on the delta.

--
Dan Abel
Petaluma, California USA

In article >,
Waldo Centini > wrote:

> Op Mon, 13 Oct 2008 19:51:14 -0500 Sqwertz illuminated the masses with
> this:
>
> > How quaint.
>
> You're posting in a European group. How so, quaint?

Rec.food. cooking is a European group? Since when?

Just one of the disadvantages of crossposting.

--
Dan Abel
Petaluma, California USA

In article >,
"Tim C." > wrote:

> On Mon, 13 Oct 2008 19:51:14 -0500, Sqwertz wrote in post :

> > Oh, you were trying to be cute by implying that RFC should adopt
> > the Europeeing date format.
> >
> > How quaint.
> >
> > -sw
>
> Quite quaint.
> No, I was trying to imply that one should post UK format dates to a UK
> group.

Rec.food.cooking is a UK group? How very quaint!

--
Dan Abel
Petaluma, California USA

Dan Abel wrote:

> Neither my wife nor I have very sensitive noses. It doesn't smell like
> skunk at all to me. There is no lingering odor for me. Once I flush
> and open the door, the smell is completely gone. I've never noticed any
> odor on any kind of skin.

So, what was the outcome of the poll?
As Dan pointed out, some people are very insensitive to the smell of
methyl mercaptan, and don't smell it in their or another's urine.
I also seem to recall that the mercaptan is a metabolic byproduct of
digestion, and that some people don't have the enzyme that creates it.
And further, that those same people don't smell it (much, if at all.)

"N Ron Hubbard" > wrote in message
d.net...
> Paul M. Cook wrote:
>> >> I can. Always good advice, eschew asparagus if out on a promising
>> >> date.
>> >>
>> >> Paul
>> >
>> > must be a *really* good date if she can smell your pee.
>> >
>>
>> I have to explain everything. Oral sex. OK, oral sex. And in case you
>> have not figured it out yet, one can give it as well as receieve it. Not
>> everyone owns a hot tub.
>
> Oral sex doesn't have to involve water sports, you know.

Then why do they call it diving?

Paul

Paul M. Cook wrote:


> I have to explain everything. Oral sex. OK, oral sex. And in case you
> have not figured it out yet, one can give it as well as receieve it. Not
> everyone owns a hot tub.


And, oral sex is not a "get out of jail free" card, as far as STDs go.

I insisted that my daughter receive the HPV vaccine, Gardasil. It
entailed a three-shot series of IM injections that are obviously
painful, even in non-wimpy girls. In Missouri, the shots are available
at no cost from Planned Parenthood to girls whose health insurance does
not cover it. Outside this program you're looking at $175.00 per shot -
$525 for the series.

Currently, only female teenagers are eligible.

However, this morning I read that the HPV virus also predisposes both
males and females to tongue and throat cancers.
http://www.physorg.com/news143133664.html

My daughter was literally gleeful at the thought that her younger
brother might need to receive the same series of innoculations.

"Kathleen" > wrote in message
...
> Paul M. Cook wrote:
>
>
>> I have to explain everything. Oral sex. OK, oral sex. And in case you
>> have not figured it out yet, one can give it as well as receieve it. Not
>> everyone owns a hot tub.
>
>
> And, oral sex is not a "get out of jail free" card, as far as STDs go.
>
> I insisted that my daughter receive the HPV vaccine, Gardasil. It entailed
> a three-shot series of IM injections that are obviously painful, even in
> non-wimpy girls. In Missouri, the shots are available at no cost from
> Planned Parenthood to girls whose health insurance does not cover it.
> Outside this program you're looking at $175.00 per shot - $525 for the
> series.
>
> Currently, only female teenagers are eligible.
>
> However, this morning I read that the HPV virus also predisposes both males
> and females to tongue and throat cancers.
> http://www.physorg.com/news143133664.html
>
> My daughter was literally gleeful at the thought that her younger brother
> might need to receive the same series of innoculations.
>

Blimey! I'm glad I was born so long ago!

--
Pete

"Kathleen" > wrote in message
...
> Paul M. Cook wrote:
>
>
>> I have to explain everything. Oral sex. OK, oral sex. And in case you
>> have not figured it out yet, one can give it as well as receieve it. Not
>> everyone owns a hot tub.
>
>
> And, oral sex is not a "get out of jail free" card, as far as STDs go.
>
> I insisted that my daughter receive the HPV vaccine, Gardasil. It
> entailed a three-shot series of IM injections that are obviously painful,
> even in non-wimpy girls. In Missouri, the shots are available at no cost
> from Planned Parenthood to girls whose health insurance does not cover it.
> Outside this program you're looking at $175.00 per shot - $525 for the
> series.
>
> Currently, only female teenagers are eligible.
>
> However, this morning I read that the HPV virus also predisposes both
> males and females to tongue and throat cancers.
> http://www.physorg.com/news143133664.html
>
> My daughter was literally gleeful at the thought that her younger brother
> might need to receive the same series of innoculations.
>
They are available here free and the inoculation program is carried out
through the school boards, except for the Catholic school boards who seem
to think that their little angels will remain virgins until they get
married!
Graham

In article >,
"Paul M. Cook" > wrote:

> "N Ron Hubbard" > wrote in message
> d.net...
> > Paul M. Cook wrote:
> >> >> I can. Always good advice, eschew asparagus if out on a promising
> >> >> date.
> >> >>
> >> >> Paul
> >> >
> >> > must be a *really* good date if she can smell your pee.
> >> >
> >>
> >> I have to explain everything. Oral sex. OK, oral sex. And in case you
> >> have not figured it out yet, one can give it as well as receieve it. Not
> >> everyone owns a hot tub.
> >
> > Oral sex doesn't have to involve water sports, you know.
>
> Then why do they call it diving?

Assuming that you are serious (a big assumption), somebody can make a
dive for a glass that got knocked off a table, in order to keep it from
shattering on the floor.

--
Dan Abel
Petaluma, California USA

In article >,
Omelet > wrote:

> In article >,
> Waldo Centini > wrote:
>
> > Op Tue, 14 Oct 2008 10:27:34 -0500 Omelet illuminated the masses with
> > this:
> >
> > >> Terrorists are human too.
> > >
> > > No, they are NOT.
> >
> > Then what are they? Animal, vegetable or mineral, gi's a clue!
>
> Sub-human.
>
> The dregs of civilized society.

Of course, I'm not going to try to justify what the terrorists have done.

But let's go back a few hundred years, when what is now the US decided
that they no longer wanted to be a colony of England. England sent over
mercenaries, as they were busy fighting on other fronts. The
mercenaries wore bright red uniforms, an easy target. They stood in
neat rows and fired on command. It was pretty easy to hide behind a
tree when it was time to be fired upon. Then, while the mercenaries
reloaded, all at once, with no method of defense, it was easy to pick
them off at will. I'm sure the mercenaries considered the colonists to
be terrorists. They refused to fight according to the usual rules of
combat. They refused to wear uniforms. I'm sure there were lots of
young boys out hunting squirrels for dinner who were killed by the
mercenaries. That didn't create any good feelings towards England.

OK, now let's try Vietnam. Now *we* were the troops, in uniform,
fighting in another country against the inhabitants of that country. A
US soldier could buy some food from a villager, then turn his back only
to get a knife in the back. It was difficult to tell friend from foe.
We were supporting a corrupt dictator, so there was a good chance that
many of the people in South Vietnam weren't very supportive of our
attempt to "fight communism". In particular, there was the village of
My Lai. US troops entered the village, and lined all of the inhabitants
up. They were all unarmed. The US troops then shot all of them, men,
women and children. Every single one. Then they burned down the whole
village. When asked why they did that, the reply was that they had to
destroy it in order to save it. Is that terrorism or what? Perhaps the
inhabitants of My Lai were feeding the Viet Cong. I guess after that,
villages would be less willing (or more secretive) to feed or provide
supplies to the Viet Cong.

--
Dan Abel
Petaluma, California USA

"Dan Abel" > wrote in message
...
> In article >,
> "Paul M. Cook" > wrote:
>
>> "N Ron Hubbard" > wrote in message
>> d.net...
>> > Paul M. Cook wrote:
>> >> >> I can. Always good advice, eschew asparagus if out on a promising
>> >> >> date.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Paul
>> >> >
>> >> > must be a *really* good date if she can smell your pee.
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> I have to explain everything. Oral sex. OK, oral sex. And in case
>> >> you
>> >> have not figured it out yet, one can give it as well as receieve it.
>> >> Not
>> >> everyone owns a hot tub.
>> >
>> > Oral sex doesn't have to involve water sports, you know.
>>
>> Then why do they call it diving?
>
> Assuming that you are serious (a big assumption), somebody can make a
> dive for a glass that got knocked off a table, in order to keep it from
> shattering on the floor.


And they can do that in a dive (a "rustic" eatery), too.

Paul

Graham wrote:

> "Kathleen" > wrote in message
> ...
>
>>Paul M. Cook wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>I have to explain everything. Oral sex. OK, oral sex. And in case you
>>>have not figured it out yet, one can give it as well as receieve it. Not
>>>everyone owns a hot tub.
>>
>>
>>And, oral sex is not a "get out of jail free" card, as far as STDs go.
>>
>>I insisted that my daughter receive the HPV vaccine, Gardasil. It
>>entailed a three-shot series of IM injections that are obviously painful,
>>even in non-wimpy girls. In Missouri, the shots are available at no cost
>>from Planned Parenthood to girls whose health insurance does not cover it.
>>Outside this program you're looking at $175.00 per shot - $525 for the
>>series.
>>
>>Currently, only female teenagers are eligible.
>>
>>However, this morning I read that the HPV virus also predisposes both
>>males and females to tongue and throat cancers.
>>http://www.physorg.com/news143133664.html
>>
>>My daughter was literally gleeful at the thought that her younger brother
>>might need to receive the same series of innoculations.
>>
>
> They are available here free and the inoculation program is carried out
> through the school boards, except for the Catholic school boards who seem
> to think that their little angels will remain virgins until they get
> married!

I substitute teach in my kids' (public) school district. No info on the
Gardasil vaccine was provided and when I spoke to the school nurses at
my kids' schools they behaved as if I'd given them a link to a kiddie
porn web site.

OTOH, when my husband mentioned the free vaccine to a fellow tool and
tie maker at work (in the context of bad reaction to painful shots), she
nearly fainted because she'd paid full price to immunize her daughters.

Morals aside, I recommend universal vaccination of teen and pre-teen
females. No matter what your feelings on premarital sex might be, your
daughter may still be subjected to physical or mental coercement.

And if the vaccine were currently available to adolescent males, my son
would be in line and baring his shoulder for the shot to protect himself
against throat and mouth cancers, and to protect his partners against
the above, plus cervical cancers.

"Tim C." > wrote:

> On Mon, 13 Oct 2008 19:51:14 -0500, Sqwertz wrote in post :
> > :
>
>> "Tim C." > wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 13 Oct 2008 05:08:15 -0500, Sqwertz wrote in post :
>>> > :
>>>
>>>> "Tim C." > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, 12 Oct 2008 06:07:45 -0500, Sqwertz wrote in post :
>>>>> > :
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Might make an interesting poll.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It was a poll on 3/12/2008.
>>>>>
>>>>> Can you see into the future or something?
>>>>
>>>> Hello?! Do you know today's date? Do you know where you are? Can
>>>> you tell us who's the president of the United States?
>>>>
>>>> -sw
>>>
>>> Hello, nice to meet you.
>>> 13th October 2008. 13/10/2008
>>> uk.food+drink.misc
>>> Some power-crazed monkey.
>>
>> Oh, you were trying to be cute by implying that RFC should adopt
>> the Europeeing date format.
>>
>> How quaint.
>>
>> -sw
>
> Quite quaint.
> No, I was trying to imply that one should post UK format dates to a UK
> group.

You'd make a good lawyer here in the U.S. You could make a fortune
suing retailers for selling fresh meat that lasts 8-11 months.

-sw

Waldo Centini > wrote:

> Op Tue, 14 Oct 2008 09:55:51 -0700 Dan Abel illuminated the masses with
> this:
>
>>>> How quaint.
>>>
>>> You're posting in a European group. How so, quaint?
>>
>> Rec.food. cooking is a European group? Since when?
>
> Ufdm is.
>
>> Just one of the disadvantages of crossposting.
>
> Then don't.

When you compare the readership of RFC to that of some podunk UK
group, then you might have a leg to stand on.

Have you read rec.food.recipes lately? That oughta REALLY **** you
off.

-sw

Omelet > wrote:

> Anyone that does not bathe prior to oral sex is just gross. Showering
> together is great foreplay imho. ;-)

Pore juice or urethra juice. Tough call.

-sw

"Kathleen" > wrote in message
news
> Graham wrote:
>
>> "Kathleen" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>
>>>Paul M. Cook wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>I have to explain everything. Oral sex. OK, oral sex. And in case you
>>>>have not figured it out yet, one can give it as well as receieve it.
>>>>Not everyone owns a hot tub.
>>>
>>>
>>>And, oral sex is not a "get out of jail free" card, as far as STDs go.
>>>
>>>I insisted that my daughter receive the HPV vaccine, Gardasil. It
>>>entailed a three-shot series of IM injections that are obviously painful,
>>>even in non-wimpy girls. In Missouri, the shots are available at no cost
>>>from Planned Parenthood to girls whose health insurance does not cover
>>>it. Outside this program you're looking at $175.00 per shot - $525 for
>>>the series.
>>>
>>>Currently, only female teenagers are eligible.
>>>
>>>However, this morning I read that the HPV virus also predisposes both
>>>males and females to tongue and throat cancers.
>>>http://www.physorg.com/news143133664.html
>>>
>>>My daughter was literally gleeful at the thought that her younger brother
>>>might need to receive the same series of innoculations.
>>>
>>
>> They are available here free and the inoculation program is carried out
>> through the school boards, except for the Catholic school boards who
>> seem to think that their little angels will remain virgins until they get
>> married!
>
> I substitute teach in my kids' (public) school district. No info on the
> Gardasil vaccine was provided and when I spoke to the school nurses at my
> kids' schools they behaved as if I'd given them a link to a kiddie porn
> web site.
>
> OTOH, when my husband mentioned the free vaccine to a fellow tool and tie
> maker at work (in the context of bad reaction to painful shots), she
> nearly fainted because she'd paid full price to immunize her daughters.
>
> Morals aside, I recommend universal vaccination of teen and pre-teen
> females. No matter what your feelings on premarital sex might be, your
> daughter may still be subjected to physical or mental coercement.
>
Agreed! I'm certain that my grand-daughter will get the jab when she's old
enough. It was the local papist bishop who stopped the catholic board from
administering it. That's the same lot who stop condoms being promoted in
Africa to help fight the spread of HIV.
Graham

Kathleen > wrote:

> I insisted that my daughter receive the HPV vaccine, Gardasil.

Does it smell like asparagus?

-sw

On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 11:47:35 +0100, "Ophelia" > wrote:

>Paco wrote:
>> "Ophelia" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> Paco wrote:
>>>> "Corey Richardson" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>> On Sun, 12 Oct 2008 06:07:45 -0500, Sqwertz
>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> We certainly can't expect our pet troll Cory to know this since he
>>>>>> only reads his own posts.
>>>>>
>>>>> Another couple of lies from you.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Could Corey be a relative of Jerry's from "across the pond"? Sure
>>>> sounds like some kind of deep-seated, parallel genetic coding.
>>>
>>> Oi! Don't you lump him in with us! Bleh!
>>>
>>
>> Sorry, but Corey is one of "yours". But, in the interest of
>> international equality, we'll keep Jerry. That is a major concession
>> and sacrifice in the name of world peace. You're welcome. ;-)
>
>Awwwwww can I not tempt you to keep them together - on your side? Your side
>is much bigger yannow

Did Giusi tell you to post that?

You're cross-poting you know? Something you allegedly *hate* and *never*
do.

Or is it when it suits you?

On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 10:00:27 -0700, Dan Abel wrote in post :
> :

> In article >,
> "Tim C." > wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 13 Oct 2008 19:51:14 -0500, Sqwertz wrote in post :
>
>>> Oh, you were trying to be cute by implying that RFC should adopt
>>> the Europeeing date format.
>>>
>>> How quaint.
>>>
>>> -sw
>>
>> Quite quaint.
>> No, I was trying to imply that one should post UK format dates to a UK
>> group.
>
> Rec.food.cooking is a UK group? How very quaint!

I never said it was. uk.food+drink.misc is though.

--
Tim C.

On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 19:08:01 -0500, Sqwertz wrote in post :
> :

> "Tim C." > wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 13 Oct 2008 19:51:14 -0500, Sqwertz wrote in post :
>> > :
>>
>>> "Tim C." > wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, 13 Oct 2008 05:08:15 -0500, Sqwertz wrote in post :
>>>> > :
>>>>
>>>>> "Tim C." > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, 12 Oct 2008 06:07:45 -0500, Sqwertz wrote in post :
>>>>>> > :
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Might make an interesting poll.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It was a poll on 3/12/2008.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Can you see into the future or something?
>>>>>
>>>>> Hello?! Do you know today's date? Do you know where you are? Can
>>>>> you tell us who's the president of the United States?
>>>>>
>>>>> -sw
>>>>
>>>> Hello, nice to meet you.
>>>> 13th October 2008. 13/10/2008
>>>> uk.food+drink.misc
>>>> Some power-crazed monkey.
>>>
>>> Oh, you were trying to be cute by implying that RFC should adopt
>>> the Europeeing date format.
>>>
>>> How quaint.
>>>
>>> -sw
>>
>> Quite quaint.
>> No, I was trying to imply that one should post UK format dates to a UK
>> group.
>
> You'd make a good lawyer here in the U.S. You could make a fortune
> suing retailers for selling fresh meat that lasts 8-11 months.
>
> -sw

as long as it lasts that long where's the problem?

--
Tim C.

On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 19:09:19 -0500, Sqwertz wrote in post :
> :

> Waldo Centini > wrote:
>
>> Op Tue, 14 Oct 2008 09:55:51 -0700 Dan Abel illuminated the masses with
>> this:
>>
>>>>> How quaint.
>>>>
>>>> You're posting in a European group. How so, quaint?
>>>
>>> Rec.food. cooking is a European group? Since when?
>>
>> Ufdm is.
>>
>>> Just one of the disadvantages of crossposting.
>>
>> Then don't.
>
> When you compare the readership of RFC to that of some podunk UK
> group, then you might have a leg to stand on.

Ah, the "my dad's bigger than your dad" line has come out. That didn't take
long did it? It's only a matter of time before Mrs Schicklgruber's
grandson's name is invoked.

--
Tim C.

Tim C. wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 19:09:19 -0500, Sqwertz wrote in post :
> > :
>
>> When you compare the readership of RFC to that of some podunk UK
>> group, then you might have a leg to stand on.
>
> Ah, the "my dad's bigger than your dad" line has come out. That didn't take
> long did it?

Oh, I see - you're just a moron.

It's called appealing to your audience. You speak in the same language
the majority of your audience understands. This is why Bosnian movies
don't go over too well in theaters outside Bosnia.

Now does it make sense to you? Sheesh. You Brits really are petty
snobs. Is this your idea of drama?

-sw

"Sqwertz" > wrote in message
...
> Tim C. wrote:
>> On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 19:09:19 -0500, Sqwertz wrote in post :
>> > :
>>
>>> When you compare the readership of RFC to that of some podunk UK
>>> group, then you might have a leg to stand on.
>>
>> Ah, the "my dad's bigger than your dad" line has come out. That didn't take
>> long did it?
>
> Oh, I see - you're just a moron.
>
> It's called appealing to your audience. You speak in the same language the
> majority of your audience understands.

Oh, but not in ufd. We speak in the same language as our uber group leader
Mike. A readers' digest summary of the thoughts of Chairman Mike (and co-chair
Guisi)

= All foreign food good, especially Latin type foreign food. (Polenta is
especially good.)
All Brit type food bad. (And that includes German/Anglo-Sax/US foods too! so
there!)

> This is why Bosnian movies don't go over too well in theaters outside
> Bosnia.

Figures.

> Now does it make sense to you? Sheesh. You Brits really are petty snobs.
> Is this your idea of drama?

Please! It would not be food if it were not dramatic.

--
Pete

On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 18:58:47 GMT, Paul M. Cook wrote:

> "N Ron Hubbard" > wrote in message
> d.net...
>>
>> Oral sex doesn't have to involve water sports, you know.
>
> Then why do they call it diving?
>
> Paul

murph diving!

your pal,
blake

On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 10:27:34 -0500, Omelet wrote:

> In article >,
> "Tim C." > wrote:
>>
>> Terrorists are human too.
>
> No, they are NOT.

what, you have to drive a stake through their hearts to kill them?

your pal,
blake

"blake murphy" > wrote in message
...
> On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 18:58:47 GMT, Paul M. Cook wrote:
>
>> "N Ron Hubbard" > wrote in message
>> d.net...
>>>
>>> Oral sex doesn't have to involve water sports, you know.
>>
>> Then why do they call it diving?
>>
>> Paul
>
> murph diving!
>

I'm in!

On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 17:48:30 +0200, Waldo Centini wrote:

> Op Tue, 14 Oct 2008 15:08:02 GMT blake murphy illuminated the masses with
> this:
>
>> xenophobic hysteria is even cheaper after the holiday.
>
> Xenophobic hysteria is fully justified when aimed at the US of A.
>
>> your pal,
>
> In your dreams, mate.

who ****ed in your warm beer?

blake

"blake murphy" > wrote in message
.. .
> On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 10:27:34 -0500, Omelet wrote:
>
>> In article >,
>> "Tim C." > wrote:
>>>
>>> Terrorists are human too.
>>
>> No, they are NOT.
>
> what, you have to drive a stake through their hearts to kill them?
>
I think she may be a little emotional about this, "babe."

In article
>,
Dan Abel > wrote:

> > > >> Terrorists are human too.
> > > >
> > > > No, they are NOT.
> > >
> > > Then what are they? Animal, vegetable or mineral, gi's a clue!
> >
> > Sub-human.
> >
> > The dregs of civilized society.
>
> Of course, I'm not going to try to justify what the terrorists have done.
>
> But let's go back a few hundred years, when what is now the US decided
> that they no longer wanted to be a colony of England.

<snipped>

Unfortunately, one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter.

But what "modern terrorists" do nowadays is a bit over the top...

Don't you agree?
--
Peace! Om

"He who has the gold makes the rules"
--Om

"He who has the guns can get the gold."
-- Steve Rothstein

blake murphy wrote:

> On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 17:48:30 +0200, Waldo Centini wrote:
>
>
>>Op Tue, 14 Oct 2008 15:08:02 GMT blake murphy illuminated the masses with
>>this:
>>
>>
>>>xenophobic hysteria is even cheaper after the holiday.
>>
>>Xenophobic hysteria is fully justified when aimed at the US of A.
>>
>>
>>>your pal,
>>
>>In your dreams, mate.
>
>
> who ****ed in your warm beer?

What do you define as warm beer?

Dave