"Michael "Dog3"" > wrote in message
5.250...
> "Jerry Sauk" >
> : in rec.food.cooking
>
> >
> > "Sheldon" > wrote in message
> > ..
> > . Sqwertz AKA Jerry Sauk wrote:
> >> Oh...... MY....... GOD!
> >>
> >> You are so ****ing pathetic it's un-****ing-believable.
> >>
> >> I'll leave the rest of this in tact for others to read while I
> >> crosspost the shit out of this for the rest of the world to see how
> >> ****ing lame you are.
> >>
> >> And those us following his kook-posts know he's not a troll. ?He
> >> really IS a genuine USDA Grade AA moron. ?This is why we killed him
> >> in the first place. ?As you can see, he took it kinda hard. ?Talk
> >> about a mental melt-down...
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Jerry Sauk AKA Sqwertz wrote:
> >> > This last couple days I get several email's from people who very
> >> > nicely asked to be removed from my kill-file. ?I think it's been
> >> > long enough
> > that
> >> > most of you have learned your lesson.
> >>
> >> > HERE'S THE DWEAL: ?There are currently 13 people in my kill-file.
> >> > ?I
> > will
> >> > copy the name's to a separate file, and eliminate the kill-file for
> >> > ONE WEEK.
> >>
> >> > Some time during the week. those of you who want to be removed
> > permanently
> >> > from the file will be expected to write a 200 word apology to me
> >> > for
> > calling
> >> > me dead.
> >>
> >> > ?Explaining what you have learned and that you won't do it again.
> >> > WARNING: ?DO NOT say that I WAS dead but came back to life, BUT
> >> > rather
> > that
> >> > I was NEVER dead and it was all a lie. ?If you say that I was dead,
> >> > you
> > will
> >> > not be removed from my kill-file. ?Anyone who does not right a
> >> > apology
> > and
> >> > post it on the group in this thread will be put back in the
> >> > kill-file at
> > the
> >> > end of the week. ?Apology's 199 words or less will be ignored.
> >>
> >> > TFM and Paco may or may not be unkillfiled since they were in it
> > before...
> >> > we'll see how they behave and then I will make a decision. ?They
> >> > WILL
> > need
> >> > to write an apology tostay out of it though.
> >>
> >> > Writing the apology does NOT gaurentee you will be removed... ?it
> >> > is strictly by my own choice who gets removed.
> >>
> >> > WARNING!!!!! ?If you take back your apology at any point in the
> >> > future
> > or
> >> > say that I died EVEN JUST ONCE, you will be immediately
> >> > re-kill-filed.
> >>
> >> > I think I am being EXTREMELY fair about this, I am NOT asking you
> >> > to say that you like the taste of fast-food or even that you like
> >> > ME, or that
> > any
> >> > of my past arguement's you now agree with, all I doing is asking
> >> > you to apologize for the damge you done to me personally. ?Example,
> >> > I am NOT telling you to say that Taco Blell is Public Property, to
> >> > be
> > unkillfiled,
> >> > but if the discussion wasn't closed we could discuss it at a later
> >> > time.
> >>
> >> > Jerry- http://tinyurl.com/4n3sbk
> >
> >
> >>You are definitely dead... with how you write you are certainly brain
> >>dead, and that is dead. It's obvious you were birthed through the
> >>nether end of your momma's alimentary canal... too bad she neglected
> >>to flush... please leave me in your killfile, I'm not interested in
> >>experiencing your stench.
> >
> > You never were in my killfile. I don't even know who you are. If
> > you
> > don't want to read my post's, then stay out of alt.fast-food.
>
> So you died and now think you own alt.fast-food? That's not the way it
> works.
>
> Michael
>
>
> --
> Find me at: - michael at lonergan dot us dot com

NOBODY owns alt.food.fast-food. but for year's I have been the biggest
on-topic poster, which means I have a right to dictate that everyone else
stay on-topic.

"Sqwertz" > wrote in message
...
> Jerry Sauk wrote:
>
> > Didn't you read the Warning's?
>
> You mena the one that said From: Jerry Sauk > ??
>
> >> Can I write 400 words?
> >
> > No. I don't have time for that.
>
> So, what if - by some act of Satan - would you do if *two* people mailed
> you their 200-word apologies? That would be 400 words.
>
> -sw

I have plenty of time for that, if it's from two different people. THAT'S
why I made the 200-word limit in the first place.

I see your still just as big of an idiot as you were before.

"TFM®" > wrote in message
. com...
>
>
> "Jerry Sauk" > wrote in message
> ...
> >
> > "Sqwertz" > wrote in message
> > ...
> >> Jerry Sauk wrote:
> >>
> >> > Didn't you read the Warning's?
> >>
> >> You mena the one that said From: Jerry Sauk >
??
> >>
> >> >> Can I write 400 words?
> >> >
> >> > No. I don't have time for that.
> >>
> >> So, what if - by some act of Satan - would you do if *two* people
mailed
> >> you their 200-word apologies? That would be 400 words.
> >>
> >> -sw
> >
> > I have plenty of time for that, if it's from two different people.
THAT'S
> > why I made the 200-word limit in the first place.
> >
> > I see your still just as big of an idiot as you were before.
> >
> >
>
> So... getting a lot of those apologies yet?
>
> I thought not.
>
>
> TFM®
>

Of course not. It seems troll's arent willing to accept the consequence's
of thier action's. Which is why thier troll's in the first pace. Just stop
asking to be rmove from my kill-file, and we're ALL happy.

On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 00:32:32 -0500, Jerry Sauk did most oddly state:
> "Michael 'Dog3'" wrote...
>> "Jerry Sauk": in rec.food.cooking
>> > "Sheldon" wrote...
>> > . Sqwertz AKA Jerry Sauk wrote:
>> >> Oh...... MY....... GOD!
>> >>
>> >> You are so ****ing pathetic it's un-****ing-believable.
>> >>
>> >> I'll leave the rest of this in tact for others to read while I
>> >> crosspost the shit out of this for the rest of the world to see how
>> >> ****ing lame you are.
>> >>
>> >> And those us following his kook-posts know he's not a troll. ?He
>> >> really IS a genuine USDA Grade AA moron. ?This is why we killed him
>> >> in the first place. ?As you can see, he took it kinda hard. ?Talk
>> >> about a mental melt-down...
>> >>
>> >> Jerry Sauk AKA Sqwertz wrote:
>> >> > This last couple days I get several email's from people who very
>> >> > nicely asked to be removed from my kill-file. ?I think it's been
>> >> > long enough
>> > that
>> >> > most of you have learned your lesson.
>> >>
>> >> > HERE'S THE DWEAL: ?There are currently 13 people in my kill-file.
>> >> > ?I
>> > will
>> >> > copy the name's to a separate file, and eliminate the kill-file for
>> >> > ONE WEEK.
>> >>
>> >> > Some time during the week. those of you who want to be removed
>> > permanently
>> >> > from the file will be expected to write a 200 word apology to me
>> >> > for
>> > calling
>> >> > me dead.
>> >>
>> >> > ?Explaining what you have learned and that you won't do it again.
>> >> > WARNING: ?DO NOT say that I WAS dead but came back to life, BUT
>> >> > rather
>> > that
>> >> > I was NEVER dead and it was all a lie. ?If you say that I was dead,
>> >> > you
>> > will
>> >> > not be removed from my kill-file. ?Anyone who does not right a
>> >> > apology
>> > and
>> >> > post it on the group in this thread will be put back in the
>> >> > kill-file at
>> > the
>> >> > end of the week. ?Apology's 199 words or less will be ignored.
>> >>
>> >> > TFM and Paco may or may not be unkillfiled since they were in it
>> > before...
>> >> > we'll see how they behave and then I will make a decision. ?They
>> >> > WILL
>> > need
>> >> > to write an apology tostay out of it though.
>> >>
>> >> > Writing the apology does NOT gaurentee you will be removed... ?it
>> >> > is strictly by my own choice who gets removed.
>> >>
>> >> > WARNING!!!!! ?If you take back your apology at any point in the
>> >> > future
>> > or
>> >> > say that I died EVEN JUST ONCE, you will be immediately
>> >> > re-kill-filed.
>> >>
>> >> > I think I am being EXTREMELY fair about this, I am NOT asking you
>> >> > to say that you like the taste of fast-food or even that you like
>> >> > ME, or that
>> > any
>> >> > of my past arguement's you now agree with, all I doing is asking
>> >> > you to apologize for the damge you done to me personally. ?Example,
>> >> > I am NOT telling you to say that Taco Blell is Public Property, to
>> >> > be
>> > unkillfiled,
>> >> > but if the discussion wasn't closed we could discuss it at a later
>> >> > time.
>> >
>> >>You are definitely dead... with how you write you are certainly brain
>> >>dead, and that is dead. It's obvious you were birthed through the
>> >>nether end of your momma's alimentary canal... too bad she neglected
>> >>to flush... please leave me in your killfile, I'm not interested in
>> >>experiencing your stench.
>> >
>> > You never were in my killfile. I don't even know who you are. If
>> > you
>> > don't want to read my post's, then stay out of alt.fast-food.
>>
>> So you died and now think you own alt.fast-food? That's not the way it
>> works.
>
> NOBODY owns alt.food.fast-food. but for year's I have been the biggest
> on-topic poster, which means I have a right to dictate that everyone else
> stay on-topic.

ROFLMAO!!! Or else you'll freak out and threaten "everyone else" with
being repr0ted to their ISP for off-topic poasting?

--
__________________________________________________ ______________________
Hail Eris! mhm 29x21; TM#5; Chung Convict #28; Usenet Ruiner #5
Demon Lord of Confusion; Official Chung Demon; Top Asshole #3
Superfaggot; Wingnut's #1 World Class Coward (next to the French)
COOSN-029-06-71069; Most Hated Usenetizen of All Time #13; Lits Slut #16
Gutter Chix0r #17; BowTie's Spuriously Accused Pedo Photographer #4
AUK Psycho & Felon #21; Parrot & Zombie #2; AUK Hate Machine Cog #19
Anonymous Psycho Criminal #18
The posting nym is best removed from my posting address if your goal is
to speak with me in private.
Supreme High Overlord of rec.radio.*
"Atheists are people who have no invisible means of support"
Join my RuneScape clan!
http://z11.invisionfree.com/Holy_Pre...abal/index.php
Full name of clan: Cabal of the Holy International Discordian Internet
And Usenet Terrorist Pretzel
A message to Tory scum: The environment is still more important than the
economy. The stock market goes up and down, and only fools think they
can control it.

"Canada is going to hades quickly with the Fag laws and the drug
problem." -- A self-professed "former kookologist" (around at the very
beginning, in fact) has an interesting definition of "quickly".
Message-ID: >

"A dog in the video I watched ****ed a human woman. The dog consented to
it and the woman consented to it. That is like one *** man consenting to
having sex with another. Do you approve of it?" -- Agamemnon watches
bestiality porn and compares it to *** sex. Message-ID:
>
http://www.kookpedia.net/index.php/Agamemnon

"I know how you special busboys are.
You're crazy." -- John "special busboy" Wentzky, in Message-ID:
>

"Roe V Wade has zero bearing on my existence other than it affects it
adversely."
-- Johnny Wentzky never had much truck with "logic". Message-ID:
>

"F!ck moderation, free speech is a masculinist proverb and that's what
feminist manvagina's like yourself." -- posted
before finishing a thought, in MID:
. com>

"Fredbot == SameAsB4 == TGOOS

"You are stalking me, even after I thrashed ya." -- PorchMonkey4Life,
a veritable combination of Sherlock Holmes and Doc Savage for the 21st
Century. No, really. Would I lie? MID: <zaUqh.2972$E35.415@trnddc02>

"He unleashes a fecal explosion he time he posts. He uses so many nyms
because he gets beaten so easily and so convincingly in flame wars and
tries to hide behind nyms in the hopes of getting a fresh start. To bad
for him that his lameness keep shining through like a beacon for all
tards (e.g., SameAs$B4, Demon Spawn, Barbara's Pus$y, FredBot,
TGOOS, ......, etc)" -- Monkey-man identifies <jitter> as me, among
others, in broken English, in MID: <Z_Xqh.3167$E35.215@trnddc02>

Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle
Trainer of the above k00k
http://www.screedbomb.info/porchie/

Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, June 2008
Hammer of Thor, July 2008

"Q: What do you call someone in the White House who is honest, caring,
and well-read?
A: A tourist." -- Anonymous

"It would be offly hard for any of you to abuse me on usenet. Really. I
have the advantage. I could easily turn alt.usenet.kooks into a cesspool
of encoded posts. Bringing the noise ratio up so high as to make the
group worthless. Anybody who can code could do this, why nobody has
bothered before now is beyond me. The ultimate spamming engine..
'BAWAHAHA'" -- Dustbin "Outer Filth" K00k's delusions of grandeur
reached new heights, in Message-ID:
>
"Immorality: The morality of those who are having a better time." -- H.
L. Mencken

"Consider that language a moment. 'Purposefully and materially
supported hostilities against the United States' is in the eye of the
beholder, and this administration has proven itself to be astonishingly
impatient with criticism of any kind. The broad powers given to Bush by
this legislation allow him to capture, indefinitely detain, and refuse a
hearing to any American citizen who speaks out against Iraq or any other
part of the so-called 'War on Terror.'

"If you write a letter to the editor attacking Bush, you could be
deemed as purposefully and materially supporting hostilities against the
United States. If you organize or join a public demonstration against
Iraq, or against the administration, the same designation could befall
you. One dark-comedy aspect of the legislation is that senators or House
members who publicly disagree with Bush, criticize him, or organize
investigations into his dealings could be placed under the same
designation. In effect, Congress just gave Bush the power to lock them
up." -- William Rivers Pitt

"It has become clear in recent months that a critical mass of the American
people have seen through the lies of the Bush administration; with the
president's polls at an historic low, growing resistance to the war Iraq,
and the Democrats likely to take back the Congress in mid-term elections,
the Bush administration is on the ropes. And so it is particularly
worrying that President Bush has seen fit, at this juncture to, in effect,
declare himself dictator." -- Frank Morales
http://www.uruknet.biz/?p=m27769&hd=0&size=1&l=e&fark

"Right you are correct. Someone hooked me. I do believe in building
relationships. That is what Christians are required to do. I am amoral.
I am sure you know what that means. So are Scorpios. I am being
'protected' by the Formosa Rule because of my 'mental illness'. I am not
targeting 'teh Mop Jockey'. You are and you are using me as a bait.
Please stop. I have my own fish to reel in. Leave me alone. It is my hope
that I will be able to catch a fish and reel it in for you. Once my
retired bishop thought I was fishing for him and he took the bait, alas
it wasn't me and that spelled the demise of our relationship. Have a
little bit more faith in me. An Eastern Orthodox bishop thought I was
fishing for him and willingly, proudly and defiantly took the bait on
public record, and it wasn't even me. Give me a break." -- Atlanta
Olympiada "Erica" Kane yammered in
Message-ID: >

"It does to a certain extant physically and theoretically
it holds even into the quantum but there observational confirmation is
limited or non existent. That's the problem and the major stumbling
block to field unification. For Dr. Einstein held out that a physical
based field theory should be sought out and not left to quantum
uncertainty of how the universe primly base works. Man made coordinate
systems are fine without knowing from where or what is the base essence
of what the space as deduced field is composed of, but not totally
satisfactory. Anomalies keep space cropping up and scientists have to
keep adjusting for these unexpected events. It's like a blind man that
has memorized his physical surroundings to a point he feels very
comfortable until that one new or unexpected event pops up and he's lost
and fumbling." -- nightbat, in one of his more lucid moments.
Message-ID: >

"Jerry Sauk" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Sqwertz" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Jerry Sauk wrote:
>>
>> > Didn't you read the Warning's?
>>
>> You mena the one that said From: Jerry Sauk > ??
>>
>> >> Can I write 400 words?
>> >
>> > No. I don't have time for that.
>>
>> So, what if - by some act of Satan - would you do if *two* people mailed
>> you their 200-word apologies? That would be 400 words.
>>
>> -sw
>
> I have plenty of time for that, if it's from two different people. THAT'S
> why I made the 200-word limit in the first place.
>
> I see your still just as big of an idiot as you were before.
>
>

So... getting a lot of those apologies yet?

I thought not.


TFM®

On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 04:05:25 -0500, Jerry Sauk wrote:

> "TFM®" > wrote in message
> . com...
>>
>>
>> So... getting a lot of those apologies yet?
>>
>> I thought not.
>>
>>
>> TFM®
>>
>
> Of course not. It seems troll's arent willing to accept the consequence's
> of thier action's. Which is why thier troll's in the first pace. Just stop
> asking to be rmove from my kill-file, and we're ALL happy.

what ****ing consequence's? being in some dipshit's killfile? you need
your head read, buddy.

blake

On Oct 23, 8:38�am, "Michael \"Dog3\"" > wrote:
> "Jerry Sauk" :in rec.food.cooking
>
> > NOBODY owns alt.food.fast-food. � but for year's I have been the
> > biggest on-topic poster, which means I have a right to dictate that
> > everyone else stay on-topic.
>
> Ohhhh... Then you're like a few we have in RFC I suppose. They like to
> complain about off topic posts... until the off topic is about something
> they would like to talk about... Is that it? �Besides, you have no rights
> on Usenet. �None. None of us do.
>
> Michael

Wait-a-min-it... sulking Sauk has earned the right to wear a tin foil
prolapsed asshole beanie: http://tinyurl.com/4n3sbk

"The God of Odd Statements, Henry Schmidt"
sta.org> wrote in message
news ..
> On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 00:32:32 -0500, Jerry Sauk did most oddly state:
> > "Michael 'Dog3'" wrote...
> >> "Jerry Sauk": in rec.food.cooking
> >> > "Sheldon" wrote...
> >> > . Sqwertz AKA Jerry Sauk wrote:
> >> >> Oh...... MY....... GOD!
> >> >>
> >> >> You are so ****ing pathetic it's un-****ing-believable.
> >> >>
> >> >> I'll leave the rest of this in tact for others to read while I
> >> >> crosspost the shit out of this for the rest of the world to see how
> >> >> ****ing lame you are.
> >> >>
> >> >> And those us following his kook-posts know he's not a troll. ?He
> >> >> really IS a genuine USDA Grade AA moron. ?This is why we killed him
> >> >> in the first place. ?As you can see, he took it kinda hard. ?Talk
> >> >> about a mental melt-down...
> >> >>
> >> >> Jerry Sauk AKA Sqwertz wrote:
> >> >> > This last couple days I get several email's from people who very
> >> >> > nicely asked to be removed from my kill-file. ?I think it's been
> >> >> > long enough
> >> > that
> >> >> > most of you have learned your lesson.
> >> >>
> >> >> > HERE'S THE DWEAL: ?There are currently 13 people in my kill-file.
> >> >> > ?I
> >> > will
> >> >> > copy the name's to a separate file, and eliminate the kill-file
for
> >> >> > ONE WEEK.
> >> >>
> >> >> > Some time during the week. those of you who want to be removed
> >> > permanently
> >> >> > from the file will be expected to write a 200 word apology to me
> >> >> > for
> >> > calling
> >> >> > me dead.
> >> >>
> >> >> > ?Explaining what you have learned and that you won't do it again.
> >> >> > WARNING: ?DO NOT say that I WAS dead but came back to life, BUT
> >> >> > rather
> >> > that
> >> >> > I was NEVER dead and it was all a lie. ?If you say that I was
dead,
> >> >> > you
> >> > will
> >> >> > not be removed from my kill-file. ?Anyone who does not right a
> >> >> > apology
> >> > and
> >> >> > post it on the group in this thread will be put back in the
> >> >> > kill-file at
> >> > the
> >> >> > end of the week. ?Apology's 199 words or less will be ignored.
> >> >>
> >> >> > TFM and Paco may or may not be unkillfiled since they were in it
> >> > before...
> >> >> > we'll see how they behave and then I will make a decision. ?They
> >> >> > WILL
> >> > need
> >> >> > to write an apology tostay out of it though.
> >> >>
> >> >> > Writing the apology does NOT gaurentee you will be removed... ?it
> >> >> > is strictly by my own choice who gets removed.
> >> >>
> >> >> > WARNING!!!!! ?If you take back your apology at any point in the
> >> >> > future
> >> > or
> >> >> > say that I died EVEN JUST ONCE, you will be immediately
> >> >> > re-kill-filed.
> >> >>
> >> >> > I think I am being EXTREMELY fair about this, I am NOT asking you
> >> >> > to say that you like the taste of fast-food or even that you like
> >> >> > ME, or that
> >> > any
> >> >> > of my past arguement's you now agree with, all I doing is asking
> >> >> > you to apologize for the damge you done to me personally.
?Example,
> >> >> > I am NOT telling you to say that Taco Blell is Public Property, to
> >> >> > be
> >> > unkillfiled,
> >> >> > but if the discussion wasn't closed we could discuss it at a later
> >> >> > time.
> >> >
> >> >>You are definitely dead... with how you write you are certainly brain
> >> >>dead, and that is dead. It's obvious you were birthed through the
> >> >>nether end of your momma's alimentary canal... too bad she neglected
> >> >>to flush... please leave me in your killfile, I'm not interested in
> >> >>experiencing your stench.
> >> >
> >> > You never were in my killfile. I don't even know who you are. If
> >> > you
> >> > don't want to read my post's, then stay out of alt.fast-food.
> >>
> >> So you died and now think you own alt.fast-food? That's not the way it
> >> works.
> >
> > NOBODY owns alt.food.fast-food. but for year's I have been the biggest
> > on-topic poster, which means I have a right to dictate that everyone
else
> > stay on-topic.
>
> ROFLMAO!!! Or else you'll freak out and threaten "everyone else" with
> being repr0ted to their ISP for off-topic poasting?

That's one possibility. Otherwise I could just killfile them.

"Michael "Dog3"" > wrote in message
.250...
> "Jerry Sauk" >
> : in rec.food.cooking
>
>
> > NOBODY owns alt.food.fast-food. but for year's I have been the
> > biggest on-topic poster, which means I have a right to dictate that
> > everyone else stay on-topic.
>
> Ohhhh... Then you're like a few we have in RFC I suppose. They like to
> complain about off topic posts... until the off topic is about something
> they would like to talk about... Is that it? Besides, you have no rights
> on Usenet. None. None of us do.
>
> Michael

WRONG. America is full of rights... ever hear of a little thing called
the constitution? Free speech? I have the RIGHT on Usenet, alt-fast.food
specifically, to say how great fast-food is.

"blake murphy" > wrote in message
. ..
> On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 04:05:25 -0500, Jerry Sauk wrote:
>
> > "TFM®" > wrote in message
> > . com...
> >>
> >>
> >> So... getting a lot of those apologies yet?
> >>
> >> I thought not.
> >>
> >>
> >> TFM®
> >>
> >
> > Of course not. It seems troll's arent willing to accept the
consequence's
> > of thier action's. Which is why thier troll's in the first pace. Just
stop
> > asking to be rmove from my kill-file, and we're ALL happy.
>
> what ****ing consequence's? being in some dipshit's killfile? you need
> your head read, buddy.
>
> blake

none of them want to be in thier, because if they did, I wouldn't have
received many requests to be taken out of it. And It's also proved by
Steve's many m,ultiple sock-puppet account's he used to get around it.

Jerry Sauk wrote:

>
> NOBODY owns alt.food.fast-food. but for year's I have been the biggest
> on-topic poster, which means I have a right to dictate that everyone else
> stay on-topic.
>
>

There is no doubt you are the "biggest", however you can dictate NOTHING!

-dk

Jerry Sauk wrote:
> "Sqwertz" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Jerry Sauk wrote:
>>
>>> Didn't you read the Warning's?
>> You mena the one that said From: Jerry Sauk > ??
>>
>>>> Can I write 400 words?
>>> No. I don't have time for that.
>> So, what if - by some act of Satan - would you do if *two* people mailed
>> you their 200-word apologies? That would be 400 words.
>>
>> -sw
>
> I have plenty of time for that, if it's from two different people. THAT'S
> why I made the 200-word limit in the first place.
>
> I see your still just as big of an idiot as you were before.
>
>

So that's a *maximum* of 200 words? Limit *would* mean maximum so...

I apologize for posting that Jerry was dead.

-dk

Jerry Sauk wrote:

>
> Of course not. It seems troll's arent willing to accept the consequence's
> of thier action's. Which is why thier troll's in the first pace. Just stop
> asking to be rmove from my kill-file, and we're ALL happy.
>
>

How many of the 13 in your killfile asked to be removed?

Jerry Sauk > wrote:

> NOBODY owns alt.food.fast-food. but for year's I have been the biggest
> on-topic poster

Well, you got that part right. You weighs 320lbs.

But your off-topic posts outweigh your on-topic posts by 30 to 1.
Now please **** off and die. Again.

-sw

"Jerry Sauk" > wrote in message
...
>

> NOBODY owns alt.food.fast-food. but for year's I have been the biggest
> on-topic poster, which means I have a right to dictate that everyone else
> stay on-topic.
>
>

Could you elaborate on biggest?

With $15.00 meals at taco bell how could you not be the biggest!!

Robert

"DK" > wrote in message
...
> Jerry Sauk wrote:
>
>>
>> Of course not. It seems troll's arent willing to accept the
>> consequence's
>> of thier action's. Which is why thier troll's in the first pace. Just
>> stop
>> asking to be rmove from my kill-file, and we're ALL happy.
>>
>>
>
> How many of the 13 in your killfile asked to be removed?


None. Zero, zip, nada. It's all a figment of his imagination.


TFM®

"Michael \"Dog3\"" > wrote in
.250:

> "Jerry Sauk" >
> : in
> rec.food.cooking
>
>
>> NOBODY owns alt.food.fast-food. but for year's I have been the
>> biggest on-topic poster, which means I have a right to dictate that
>> everyone else stay on-topic.
>
> Ohhhh... Then you're like a few we have in RFC I suppose. They like to
> complain about off topic posts... until the off topic is about
> something they would like to talk about... Is that it? Besides, you
> have no rights on Usenet. None. None of us do.
>
> Michael

Hey, long time no see!

Jerry looks like he'll fit in fine in AUK, if he doesn't mind being the
main course.



--
Black Metal ist Krieg

"Jerry Sauk" > wrote in
:

>
> "Michael "Dog3"" > wrote in message
> 5.250...
>> "Jerry Sauk" >
>> : in
>> rec.food.cooking
>>
>> >
>> > "Sheldon" > wrote in message
>> >
>> > m.. . Sqwertz AKA Jerry Sauk wrote:
>> >> Oh...... MY....... GOD!
>> >>
>> >> You are so ****ing pathetic it's un-****ing-believable.
>> >>
>> >> I'll leave the rest of this in tact for others to read while I
>> >> crosspost the shit out of this for the rest of the world to see
>> >> how ****ing lame you are.
>> >>
>> >> And those us following his kook-posts know he's not a troll. ?He
>> >> really IS a genuine USDA Grade AA moron. ?This is why we killed
>> >> him in the first place. ?As you can see, he took it kinda hard.
>> >> ?Talk about a mental melt-down...
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Jerry Sauk AKA Sqwertz wrote:
>> >> > This last couple days I get several email's from people who very
>> >> > nicely asked to be removed from my kill-file. ?I think it's been
>> >> > long enough
>> > that
>> >> > most of you have learned your lesson.
>> >>
>> >> > HERE'S THE DWEAL: ?There are currently 13 people in my
>> >> > kill-file. ?I
>> > will
>> >> > copy the name's to a separate file, and eliminate the kill-file
>> >> > for ONE WEEK.
>> >>
>> >> > Some time during the week. those of you who want to be removed
>> > permanently
>> >> > from the file will be expected to write a 200 word apology to me
>> >> > for
>> > calling
>> >> > me dead.
>> >>
>> >> > ?Explaining what you have learned and that you won't do it
>> >> > again. WARNING: ?DO NOT say that I WAS dead but came back to
>> >> > life, BUT rather
>> > that
>> >> > I was NEVER dead and it was all a lie. ?If you say that I was
>> >> > dead, you
>> > will
>> >> > not be removed from my kill-file. ?Anyone who does not right a
>> >> > apology
>> > and
>> >> > post it on the group in this thread will be put back in the
>> >> > kill-file at
>> > the
>> >> > end of the week. ?Apology's 199 words or less will be ignored.
>> >>
>> >> > TFM and Paco may or may not be unkillfiled since they were in it
>> > before...
>> >> > we'll see how they behave and then I will make a decision. ?They
>> >> > WILL
>> > need
>> >> > to write an apology tostay out of it though.
>> >>
>> >> > Writing the apology does NOT gaurentee you will be removed...
>> >> > ?it is strictly by my own choice who gets removed.
>> >>
>> >> > WARNING!!!!! ?If you take back your apology at any point in the
>> >> > future
>> > or
>> >> > say that I died EVEN JUST ONCE, you will be immediately
>> >> > re-kill-filed.
>> >>
>> >> > I think I am being EXTREMELY fair about this, I am NOT asking
>> >> > you to say that you like the taste of fast-food or even that you
>> >> > like ME, or that
>> > any
>> >> > of my past arguement's you now agree with, all I doing is asking
>> >> > you to apologize for the damge you done to me personally.
>> >> > ?Example, I am NOT telling you to say that Taco Blell is Public
>> >> > Property, to be
>> > unkillfiled,
>> >> > but if the discussion wasn't closed we could discuss it at a
>> >> > later time.
>> >>
>> >> > Jerry- http://tinyurl.com/4n3sbk
>> >
>> >
>> >>You are definitely dead... with how you write you are certainly
>> >>brain dead, and that is dead. It's obvious you were birthed
>> >>through the nether end of your momma's alimentary canal... too bad
>> >>she neglected to flush... please leave me in your killfile, I'm not
>> >>interested in experiencing your stench.
>> >
>> > You never were in my killfile. I don't even know who you are.
>> > If you
>> > don't want to read my post's, then stay out of alt.fast-food.
>>
>> So you died and now think you own alt.fast-food? That's not the way
>> it works.
>>
>> Michael
>>
>>
>> --
>> Find me at: - michael at lonergan dot us dot com
>
> NOBODY owns alt.food.fast-food. but for year's I have been the
> biggest on-topic poster, which means I have a right to dictate that
> everyone else stay on-topic.

Yo, Jerry. Do I need a hall pass to post in alt.fast-food? Do I need
references? Do you think it is matters if you object?

It was real solid of you to share your ****headedness with AUK. We usually
have to drag shitheads in so we can poke them, and here you are offering
yourself up like a sacrificial lamb.

Anyone have any mint sauce?

--
Black Metal ist Krieg

"spooge" > wrote in message
...
> "Michael \"Dog3\"" > wrote in
> .250:

>> Ohhhh... Then you're like a few we have in RFC I suppose. They like to
>> complain about off topic posts... until the off topic is about
>> something they would like to talk about... Is that it? Besides, you
>> have no rights on Usenet. None. None of us do.
>>
>> Michael
>
> Hey, long time no see!
>

Long time no see from here, too. lol

Cheryl, who had to remove some froups to get this to go through. Damn
censorship.


> Jerry looks like he'll fit in fine in AUK, if he doesn't mind being the
> main course.
>

On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 13:38:56 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
> wrote:

>Steve's many m,ultiple sock-puppet account's he used to get around it.
>
Yet he gets all ****ed off if anyone accuses him of it, because he
"signs his name". Oh, goody! My, my isn't that honorable of him?
NOT. TFM is another name shifter - who isn't anywhere as obnoxious
(IMO). Greg needs to get a life (in the case of a certain cyber
poster) too. I'm not saying I wouldn't be just as obnoxious in his
place, I'm just saying it doesn't play well to a wider audience -
which includes me.



--
I never worry about diets. The only carrots that
interest me are the number of carats in a diamond.

Mae West

sf > wrote:

> On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 13:38:56 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
> > wrote:
>
>>Steve's many m,ultiple sock-puppet account's he used to get around it.
>>
> Yet he gets all ****ed off if anyone accuses him of it, because he
> "signs his name".

Huh?

Ahh - never mind. Everybody signs my name (-sw), in case you didn't
notice. We (or is it just me?) do that just to **** you off and
make you moan.

-sw

Michael "Dog3" wrote:
> "Jerry Sauk" >
> : in rec.food.cooking
>
>> "Michael "Dog3"" > wrote in message
>> .250...
>>> "Jerry Sauk" >
>>> : in
>>> rec.food.cooking
>>>
>>>
>>>> NOBODY owns alt.food.fast-food. but for year's I have been the
>>>> biggest on-topic poster, which means I have a right to dictate that
>>>> everyone else stay on-topic.
>>> Ohhhh... Then you're like a few we have in RFC I suppose. They like
>>> to complain about off topic posts... until the off topic is about
>>> something they would like to talk about... Is that it? Besides, you
>>> have no rights on Usenet. None. None of us do.
>>>
>>> Michael
>> WRONG. America is full of rights... ever hear of a little thing
>> called
>> the constitution? Free speech? I have the RIGHT on Usenet,
>> alt-fast.food specifically, to say how great fast-food is.
>
> Jerry, Jerry, Jerry... of course you have the right to express yourself.
> Yes you do. However, you do not have the right to censor others, OR, as
> you wrote yourself; "I have a right to dictate that everyone else stay
> on-topic". You don't have that right Jerry. No one has that right on
> Usenet unless the group is moderated. Now, if you want to play God, I
> suggest you spit out the Big Mac, get off your fat ass, and do the work
> it takes to start your own moderated group. When that is done, you will
> have the right to moderate posts as you see fit. The question is, will
> you be able to stand it... sitting there, stuffing your face and talking
> only to yourself?
>
> Michael
>
>
>
Wow, Michael, I'm impressed. You really can get riled up at idiots. <VBG>

Of course I cut out the other two newsgroups this was addressed to as I
don't read them anyway.

On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 13:31:51 -0500, Jerry Sauk attempted to confuse the
issue further by squeaking:
> "The God of Odd Statements, Henry Schmidt" wrote...
>> On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 00:32:32 -0500, Jerry Sauk did most oddly state:
>> > "Michael 'Dog3'" wrote...
>> >> "Jerry Sauk": in rec.food.cooking
>> >> > "Sheldon" wrote...
>> >> > . Sqwertz AKA Jerry Sauk wrote:
>> >> >> Oh...... MY....... GOD!
>> >> >>
>> >> >> You are so ****ing pathetic it's un-****ing-believable.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I'll leave the rest of this in tact for others to read while I
>> >> >> crosspost the shit out of this for the rest of the world to see
>> >> >> how ****ing lame you are.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> And those us following his kook-posts know he's not a troll. ?He
>> >> >> really IS a genuine USDA Grade AA moron. ?This is why we killed
>> >> >> him in the first place. ?As you can see, he took it kinda hard.
>> >> >> ?Talk about a mental melt-down...
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Jerry Sauk AKA Sqwertz wrote:
>> >> >> > This last couple days I get several email's from people who very
>> >> >> > nicely asked to be removed from my kill-file. ?I think it's been
>> >> >> > long enough
>> >> > that
>> >> >> > most of you have learned your lesson.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > HERE'S THE DWEAL: ?There are currently 13 people in my
>> >> >> > kill-file. ?I
>> >> > will
>> >> >> > copy the name's to a separate file, and eliminate the kill-file
> for
>> >> >> > ONE WEEK.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > Some time during the week. those of you who want to be removed
>> >> > permanently
>> >> >> > from the file will be expected to write a 200 word apology to me
>> >> >> > for
>> >> > calling
>> >> >> > me dead.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > ?Explaining what you have learned and that you won't do it
>> >> >> > again. WARNING: ?DO NOT say that I WAS dead but came back to
>> >> >> > life, BUT rather
>> >> > that
>> >> >> > I was NEVER dead and it was all a lie. ?If you say that I was
> dead,
>> >> >> > you
>> >> > will
>> >> >> > not be removed from my kill-file. ?Anyone who does not right a
>> >> >> > apology
>> >> > and
>> >> >> > post it on the group in this thread will be put back in the
>> >> >> > kill-file at
>> >> > the
>> >> >> > end of the week. ?Apology's 199 words or less will be ignored.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > TFM and Paco may or may not be unkillfiled since they were in it
>> >> > before...
>> >> >> > we'll see how they behave and then I will make a decision. ?They
>> >> >> > WILL
>> >> > need
>> >> >> > to write an apology tostay out of it though.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > Writing the apology does NOT gaurentee you will be removed...
>> >> >> > ?it is strictly by my own choice who gets removed.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > WARNING!!!!! ?If you take back your apology at any point in the
>> >> >> > future
>> >> > or
>> >> >> > say that I died EVEN JUST ONCE, you will be immediately
>> >> >> > re-kill-filed.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > I think I am being EXTREMELY fair about this, I am NOT asking
>> >> >> > you to say that you like the taste of fast-food or even that you
>> >> >> > like ME, or that
>> >> > any
>> >> >> > of my past arguement's you now agree with, all I doing is asking
>> >> >> > you to apologize for the damge you done to me personally.
> ?Example,
>> >> >> > I am NOT telling you to say that Taco Blell is Public Property,
>> >> >> > to be
>> >> > unkillfiled,
>> >> >> > but if the discussion wasn't closed we could discuss it at a
>> >> >> > later time.
>> >> >
>> >> >>You are definitely dead... with how you write you are certainly
>> >> >>brain dead, and that is dead. It's obvious you were birthed
>> >> >>through the nether end of your momma's alimentary canal... too bad
>> >> >>she neglected to flush... please leave me in your killfile, I'm not
>> >> >>interested in experiencing your stench.
>> >> >
>> >> > You never were in my killfile. I don't even know who you are.
>> >> > If you
>> >> > don't want to read my post's, then stay out of alt.fast-food.
>> >>
>> >> So you died and now think you own alt.fast-food? That's not the way
>> >> it works.
>> >
>> > NOBODY owns alt.food.fast-food. but for year's I have been the biggest
>> > on-topic poster, which means I have a right to dictate that everyone
> else
>> > stay on-topic.
>>
>> ROFLMAO!!! Or else you'll freak out and threaten "everyone else" with
>> being repr0ted to their ISP for off-topic poasting?
>
> That's one possibility.

What else could you possibly mean by "dictate"?

> Otherwise I could just killfile them.

That'd be the grown-up thing to do, though.

--
__________________________________________________ ______________________
Hail Eris! mhm 29x21; TM#5; COOSN-029-06-71069; Usenet Ruiner #5
The God of Odd Statements, the Ugliest Pig****er In The Universe
Stupidity Takes Its Toll. Please Have Exact Change.
Most Hated Usenetizen of All Time #13; Lits Slut #16
Gutter Chix0r #17; BowTie's Spuriously Accused Pedo Photographer #4
AUK Psycho & Felon #21; Parrot & Zombie #2; AUK Hate Machine Cog #19
Anonymous Psycho Criminal #18
Remove all the confusion and k00ks from my posting addy to send me your
sekrit messages.
"The most useful tool for dealing with management types is, of course,
an automatic weapon."

"these trolls are frustrated youngsters with serious psychic problems."
-- a web version of Alexa Cameron, named Adrian.
http://preview.tinyurl.com/6z5zym

"The fact that you are trying to defend the proselytisation of
homosexuality shows that RTG is making you turn *** step by step,
whereas I have been able to resist his sexual brainwashing. If you watch
series 2 of Torchwood you might even become a fully fledged mincer
yourself, complete with mashed potatoes and gravy." -- Yes, Aggie means
Russell T. "Gayvies". Message-ID:
>

Official Chung Demon

Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle
Trainer of PorchMonkey4Life
http://www.screedbomb.info/porchie/

Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, June 2008
Hammer of Thor, July 2008

"You are the GOD-DAMNED, IGNORANT LIAR here.
Now, that is not me taking the Lord's name in vain."
-- John Wentzky: Living proof of the Death of Irony, in Message-ID:
>

I mourned:
> The Mop Jockey did most oddly state:
>> DUDE, YOU WIN TEH INTERNETS!!!
>>
>> the oversized check is in the mail.
>
> Alas, all I get for my trouble is a Monkey that's trained to hurl shit
> under several of my nyms.

"DevMcKinHole, you also get the pleasure of sucking off my doggy and
cleaning out his butthole with your tongue." -- He's not so much a
*Porch*Monkey as a _Fire_Monkey, as in one who's on fire due to his
own tendency to mess with lighter fluid while standing beside a hot
stove. Message-ID: <77Uxh.1996$384.1135@trnddc05>

Said I:
> You, Monkey-man, are quite possibly the only usenetter in existence
> who does not and cannot own Hatter.

"[...] What's the matter fagboi, am I beating your as$ so badly that
you're no seeking an alliance with the diaperboi?...YOu really don't
know how dumb you are, do ya?" -- I guess I don't, Monkey.
Message-ID: <gHVIh.1760$Bi2.1639@trnddc01>

"Ok, but I am not stalking Teh Mop Jockey, I seem to be building a
relationship with him. Remember, I am a Christian so the secular rules
do not apply to me. I strive to be amoral, which I think applies to this
situation. Keep this in mind, please. Since I am currently mentally ill
and since I can not nominate, that is what I am doing at this time." --
Olympiada: Teh amoral "Christian", in Message-ID:
>

"You're like some kind of rabid attack-gerbil." -- Lionel Lauer to Joxer
in MID: >

"I say you are out of your ****ing mind." -- Ying Guo, posting as
"SameAsB4" >, tells PorchMonkey4Life, posting
as the same nick but a slightly different morph, the score, in MID:
>

"in the holy spirit i know you would satisfy every single person in a
room if you were the only person present." -- ~tanya, to Crazy Andy II,
in MID: . com>

If you never read anything else in any of my sigs, read this:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15321167/
http://borealin.livejournal.com/15104.html
Or watch it he
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uqxmPjB0WSs
Then, if you manage to read/watch all that, try this:
http://www.newamericancentury.org/Re...asDefenses.pdf
And Molly Ivins had a few choice words to say about it, weeks befo
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/092906B.shtml
Here's Chris Floyd: Fatal Vision: The Deeper Evil Behind the Detainee
Bill: http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/100206A.shtml

"Q: What's the difference between the Vietnam War and the Iraq War?
A: George W. Bush had a plan to get out of the Vietnam War." -- Anon.

Thread where outing begins: http://tinyurl.com/hojf8
George Pickett Memorial Trophy, Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart,
and the Order of the Holey Sockpuppet winner > on
outing personal contact info in x-poasted subject lines:
"Plenty of people post under their real names and do not attempt to hide
their contact info. You are scared of being 'outed' because you are a
pathological abuser of usenet, and people rightly despise you for it.
You're afraid of being reported to the authorities or, better, visited
by a couple of guys with baseball bats. Other people don't have this
obsessive fear. Ward Hardman himself has posted plenty of personal
information - nothing that anyone else added was hidden in any way.
You're so ****ing scared you've built up this whole sick mythology about
different categories of bad dudes who 'out' scum like you.

"Meanwhile you are the ugliest pig****er in the universe. You are the
coward without ethics. You call me a 'newbie' - ha! what an asshole you
are. Those who want to remain anonymous do so. There is absolutely no
way you could identify me, not unless you had the sort of subpoena power
that only gets turned on for big-time terrorists. That's because I chose
to be anonymous. Some people don't. Only really stupid dicks like you
choose the sort of semi-anonymity which leaves you in constant fear.

"What a dickless wonder you are 'Snarky' you fat asshole."
-- in MID: . com>

"I am the only one who has outer filthed Ward" -- James C. "Crackhead"
Cracked voluntarily self-immolates, in MID:


"When I told Abbie Hoffman that he was the first one who made me laugh
since Lenny Bruce died, Hoffman said, "Really? He was my god." The
combination of satirical irreverence and sense of justice that Bruce and
Hoffman shared was the real spirit behind the Yippies--a term I coined
to describe a phenomenon that already existed: an organic coalition of
stoned hippies and political activists who engaged in such actions as
throwing money on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange, then
explaining to reporters the meaning of that symbolism. Folksinger Phil
Ochs summed it up: "A demonstration should turn you on, not turn you
off." So when journalists link the Yippies with misleading bedfellows,
at best it's careless shorthand; at worst it's deliberate demonization.
Osama bin Laden wanted an aircraft to crash into the Pentagon. Abbie
Hoffman merely wanted to levitate it." -- Paul Krassner,
http://tinyurl.com/ehu3v

DK wrote:
> Jerry Sauk wrote:
>> "Sqwertz" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> Jerry Sauk wrote:
>>>
>>>> Didn't you read the Warning's?
>>> You mena the one that said From: Jerry Sauk > ??
>>>
>>>>> Can I write 400 words?
>>>> No. I don't have time for that.
>>> So, what if - by some act of Satan - would you do if *two* people mailed
>>> you their 200-word apologies? That would be 400 words.
>>>
>>> -sw
>>
>> I have plenty of time for that, if it's from two different people.
>> THAT'S
>> why I made the 200-word limit in the first place.
>>
>> I see your still just as big of an idiot as you were before.
>>
>>
>
> So that's a *maximum* of 200 words? Limit *would* mean maximum so...
>
> I apologize for posting that Jerry was dead.
>
> -dk

ditto


That's 199 words under the limit

George Shirley wrote:


> Of course I cut out the other two newsgroups this was addressed to as
> I don't read them anyway.

Gee thanks. That didn't allow my filter to work.




Brian

--
If televison's a babysitter, the Internet is a drunk librarian who
won't shut up.
-- Dorothy Gambrell (http://catandgirl.com)

Jerry Sauk > writes:

> It seems troll's arent willing to accept the consequence's
> of thier action's. Which is why thier troll's in the first
> pace.


Q: What would Jerry Sauk be doing if he were alive today?

A: Scratching at the lid of his casket.

(Please don't killfile me, Jerry. Those aren't my words.
I read that in another newsgroup, and am only quoting it.)



Geoff

--
"If you take a Republican and shoot out major portions
of his brains, I guess it's not too surprising you might
end up with a Democrat." -- Rusty Sanders on James Brady

DK > writes:

[to Jerry]

> There is no doubt you are the "biggest", however
> you can dictate NOTHING!


ObTim: "Say, Cloesha, how mah dictate?"



Geoff

--
"If you take a Republican and shoot out major portions
of his brains, I guess it's not too surprising you might
end up with a Democrat." -- Rusty Sanders on James Brady

"sf" > wrote in message
...
> On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 13:38:56 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
> > wrote:
>
>>Steve's many m,ultiple sock-puppet account's he used to get around it.
>>
> Yet he gets all ****ed off if anyone accuses him of it, because he
> "signs his name". Oh, goody! My, my isn't that honorable of him?
> NOT. TFM is another name shifter - who isn't anywhere as obnoxious
> (IMO). Greg needs to get a life (in the case of a certain cyber
> poster) too. I'm not saying I wouldn't be just as obnoxious in his
> place, I'm just saying it doesn't play well to a wider audience -
> which includes me.
>

To "a wider audience?" As if there is a narrow audience that enjoys this
asinine drivel?

On Fri, 24 Oct 2008 05:09:26 -0500, Sqwertz >
wrote:

>sf > wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 13:38:56 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>> > wrote:
>>
>>>Steve's many m,ultiple sock-puppet account's he used to get around it.
>>>
>> Yet he gets all ****ed off if anyone accuses him of it, because he
>> "signs his name".
>
>Huh?
>
>Ahh - never mind. Everybody signs my name (-sw), in case you didn't
>notice. We (or is it just me?) do that just to **** you off and
>make you moan.
>
>-sw

Oh yeah, you're a victim. Suuure.



--
I never worry about diets. The only carrots that
interest me are the number of carats in a diamond.

Mae West

On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 19:12:13 -0400, DK wrote these lies, denials, arrogant
assertions, erroneous presuppositions, and/or obfuscations:
> Jerry Sauk wrote:
>> "Sqwertz" wrote...
>>> Jerry Sauk wrote:
>>>
>>>> Didn't you read the Warning's?
>>> You mena the one that said From: Jerry Sauk >
>>> ??
>>>
>>>>> Can I write 400 words?
>>>> No. I don't have time for that.
>>> So, what if - by some act of Satan - would you do if *two* people
>>> mailed you their 200-word apologies? That would be 400 words.
>>>
>>> -sw
>>
>> I have plenty of time for that, if it's from two different people.
>> THAT'S why I made the 200-word limit in the first place.
>>
>> I see your still just as big of an idiot as you were before.
>
> So that's a *maximum* of 200 words? Limit *would* mean maximum so...
>
> I apologize for posting that Jerry was dead.

So, is Jerry a flesh-eating ghoul, a regular zombie, or a vampire?

--
__________________________________________________ ______________________
Hail Eris! mhm 29x21; TM#5; Anonymous Psycho Criminal #18
TEH USENETS BULLIE
http://www.runescape.com/
Join my RuneScape clan!
http://z11.invisionfree.com/Holy_Pre...abal/index.php
Full name of clan: Cabal of the Holy International Discordian Internet
And Usenet Terrorist Pretzel

Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle
Trainer of PorchMonkey4Life
http://www.screedbomb.info/porchie/

Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, June 2008
Hammer of Thor, July 2008

"But the other thing about her, she does know about international
relations because she is right up there in Alaska right next door to
Russia." -- Steve Doocy of FOX News was obviously a football player in
his early adulthood.

Hey, Aggie! Does this sound familiar?
Message-ID: >

"Marcella proves once again that she's an ignorant racist bigot." -- OK,
what race are Greeks, again? Aggie's so much more knowledgeable than I
about that sort of thing. Message-ID:
>

"It could be several." -- Aggie answers marc_CH's question about which
drugs Jamaican athletes such as Powell and Bolt have been taking.
Message-ID: >

"Only athletes on drugs win meddles. [...]

"And the funny thing is the Greek weightlifters were not winning meddles
even while on drugs. Clearly every single weightlifter that beat a Greek
weightlifter was taking more drugs than they were." -- Yeah, that's the
ticket, Aggie! Message-ID:
>

"Do Usenet posters on drugs not know how to spell 'medals'?" -- They
really don't, marc_CH. Message-ID:
>

"Not supporting me is equivalent to forfeiting your own rights." --
John D. Wentzky: Warrior For Your Freedumb! Message-ID:
>

"You cognatatively challenged fool!" -- According to Agamemnon, Stephen
Wilson is, apparently, highly ignorant about cognates, and so is anyone
who dares to disagree with him, in Message-ID:
>

"Is it still necrophilia if I'm conscious?" -- Owen Harper, "Dead Man
Walking", Torchwood (20/207)

Eric "Reality Check©"/"Vox"/"_ Prof. Jonez _" Ross is a racist and
homophobic liar, k00k, and paedophile, as well as a coprophage.

On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 11:59:49 +0000, Michael "Dog3" wrote these lies,
denials, arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions, and/or
obfuscations:
> Geoff Miller: in rec.food.cooking
>> Jerry Sauk writes:
>>
>>> It seems troll's arent willing to accept the consequence's of thier
>>> action's. Which is why thier troll's in the first pace.
>>
>> Q: What would Jerry Sauk be doing if he were alive today?
>>
>> A: Scratching at the lid of his casket.
>>
>> (Please don't killfile me, Jerry. Those aren't my words. I read that in
>> another newsgroup, and am only quoting it.)
>
> I though he would be gnawing his way out of the casket.

Dead or alive?

--
__________________________________________________ ______________________
Hail Eris! mhm 29x21; TM#5; Anonymous Psycho Criminal #18
TEH USENETS BULLIE
http://www.runescape.com/
Join my RuneScape clan!
http://z11.invisionfree.com/Holy_Pre...abal/index.php
Full name of clan: Cabal of the Holy International Discordian Internet
And Usenet Terrorist Pretzel

Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle
Trainer of PorchMonkey4Life
http://www.screedbomb.info/porchie/

Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, June 2008
Hammer of Thor, July 2008

"But the other thing about her, she does know about international
relations because she is right up there in Alaska right next door to
Russia." -- Steve Doocy of FOX News was obviously a football player in
his early adulthood.

Hey, Aggie! Does this sound familiar?
Message-ID: >

"Marcella proves once again that she's an ignorant racist bigot." -- OK,
what race are Greeks, again? Aggie's so much more knowledgeable than I
about that sort of thing. Message-ID:
>

"It could be several." -- Aggie answers marc_CH's question about which
drugs Jamaican athletes such as Powell and Bolt have been taking.
Message-ID: >

"Only athletes on drugs win meddles. [...]

"And the funny thing is the Greek weightlifters were not winning meddles
even while on drugs. Clearly every single weightlifter that beat a Greek
weightlifter was taking more drugs than they were." -- Yeah, that's the
ticket, Aggie! Message-ID:
>

"Do Usenet posters on drugs not know how to spell 'medals'?" -- They
really don't, marc_CH. Message-ID:
>

"Not supporting me is equivalent to forfeiting your own rights." --
John D. Wentzky: Warrior For Your Freedumb! Message-ID:
>

"You cognatatively challenged fool!" -- According to Agamemnon, Stephen
Wilson is, apparently, highly ignorant about cognates, and so is anyone
who dares to disagree with him, in Message-ID:
>

"Is it still necrophilia if I'm conscious?" -- Owen Harper, "Dead Man
Walking", Torchwood (20/207)

Eric "Reality Check©"/"Vox"/"_ Prof. Jonez _" Ross is a racist and
homophobic liar, k00k, and paedophile, as well as a coprophage.

Michael "Dog3" wrote:
> George Shirley >
> : in rec.food.cooking
>
>> Wow, Michael, I'm impressed. You really can get riled up at idiots.
>> <VBG>
>>
>> Of course I cut out the other two newsgroups this was addressed to as
>> I don't read them anyway.
>
> I'm just "riled" up... period. It's not been a good week around here
> and I'm fed up with fools. I'm tired of walking on egg shells around
> whiney assed, self indulgent cretins.

There, there luvvie. Come and sit down by me and have anarsecuppatea

On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 12:45:48 GMT, Snarky wrote:

> On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 19:12:13 -0400, DK wrote these lies, denials, arrogant
> assertions, erroneous presuppositions, and/or obfuscations:
>> Jerry Sauk wrote:
>>> "Sqwertz" wrote...
>>>> Jerry Sauk wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Didn't you read the Warning's?
>>>> You mena the one that said From: Jerry Sauk >
>>>> ??
>>>>
>>>>>> Can I write 400 words?
>>>>> No. I don't have time for that.
>>>> So, what if - by some act of Satan - would you do if *two* people
>>>> mailed you their 200-word apologies? That would be 400 words.
>>>>
>>>> -sw
>>>
>>> I have plenty of time for that, if it's from two different people.
>>> THAT'S why I made the 200-word limit in the first place.
>>>
>>> I see your still just as big of an idiot as you were before.
>>
>> So that's a *maximum* of 200 words? Limit *would* mean maximum so...
>>
>> I apologize for posting that Jerry was dead.
>
> So, is Jerry a flesh-eating ghoul, a regular zombie, or a vampire?

i thought he didn't eat anything not served at taco bell or burger king.

your pal,
blake

"Michael "Dog3"" > wrote in message
5.247...
> TFM® >
> om: in
> rec.food.cooking
>
>>
>>
>> "DK" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> Jerry Sauk wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Of course not. It seems troll's arent willing to accept the
>>>> consequence's
>>>> of thier action's. Which is why thier troll's in the first pace.
>>>> Just stop
>>>> asking to be rmove from my kill-file, and we're ALL happy.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> How many of the 13 in your killfile asked to be removed?
>>
>>
>> None. Zero, zip, nada. It's all a figment of his imagination.
>
> Eventually he'll have everyone in his killfile and he'll be yapping to
> himself. He'll have to free the prisoners but he'll have to free them all
> because he'll have long fogotten which ones ****ed him off the most, and
> why he enslaved them in the killfile to begin with.
>
> Tell me he's not one of these people that have the fantasy that using a
> killfile gives him some sort of divine "power" over Usenet... tell me it
> ain't so...
>

Anyone else's irony meters going wild here?

sf > wrote:

> On Fri, 24 Oct 2008 05:09:26 -0500, Sqwertz >
> wrote:
>
>>sf > wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 13:38:56 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>>Steve's many m,ultiple sock-puppet account's he used to get around it.
>>>>
>>> Yet he gets all ****ed off if anyone accuses him of it, because he
>>> "signs his name".
>>
>>Huh?
>>
>>Ahh - never mind. Everybody signs my name (-sw), in case you didn't
>>notice. We (or is it just me?) do that just to **** you off and
>>make you moan.
>
> Oh yeah, you're a victim. Suuure.

You're such a mindless ****. Obviously the signing of my name is
endorsed by myself.

I took you out of the killfile to have some fun with you, but your
wit is on par with a 2nd grader.

-sw

On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 13:45:25 -0500, Sqwertz >
wrote:

>I took you out of the killfile to have some fun with you, but your
>wit is on par with a 2nd grader.

Thanks for the compliment.


--
I never worry about diets. The only carrots that
interest me are the number of carats in a diamond.

Mae West

Due to certain issue's I haven't had time to read all he unread messages
from yesterday, especially with all the cross-posted and off-topic crap that
once again is slamming the group.

To be fair to everyone involved I am extended the deadline for apology's
until a few hours after I get a chance to respond to all the message's.
Probably sometime tomorow night. This WILL be the last chance.

Jerry Sauk > wrote:

> To be fair to everyone involved I am extended the deadline for apology's
> until a few hours after I get a chance to respond to all the message's.
> Probably sometime tomorow night. This WILL be the last chance.

Are you going to sit outside all week waiting for the Great Pumpkin
next week?

You'd stand a better chance catching a glimpse of him than you would
getting an apology.

-sw

Sqwertz wrote:
> Jerry Sauk > wrote:
>
>> To be fair to everyone involved I am extended the deadline for
>> apology's until a few hours after I get a chance to respond to all
>> the message's. Probably sometime tomorow night. This WILL be the
>> last chance.
>
> Are you going to sit outside all week waiting for the Great Pumpkin
> next week?
>
> You'd stand a better chance catching a glimpse of him than you would
> getting an apology.

LOL's <g>

"DK" > wrote in message
...
> Jerry Sauk wrote:
>
> >
> > NOBODY owns alt.food.fast-food. but for year's I have been the biggest
> > on-topic poster, which means I have a right to dictate that everyone
else
> > stay on-topic.
> >
> >
>
> There is no doubt you are the "biggest", however you can dictate NOTHING!
>
> -dk

Ever hear of a little thing called Netiquette? I hjave a right to demand
that it be followed.