"DK" > wrote in message
...
> Jerry Sauk wrote:
> > "Sqwertz" > wrote in message
> > ...
> >> Jerry Sauk wrote:
> >>
> >>> Didn't you read the Warning's?
> >> You mena the one that said From: Jerry Sauk >
??
> >>
> >>>> Can I write 400 words?
> >>> No. I don't have time for that.
> >> So, what if - by some act of Satan - would you do if *two* people
mailed
> >> you their 200-word apologies? That would be 400 words.
> >>
> >> -sw
> >
> > I have plenty of time for that, if it's from two different people.
THAT'S
> > why I made the 200-word limit in the first place.
> >
> > I see your still just as big of an idiot as you were before.
> >
> >
>
> So that's a *maximum* of 200 words? Limit *would* mean maximum so...
>
> I apologize for posting that Jerry was dead.
>
> -dk

It's MINUMUM 200 words, Dan. And a 200-word limit also.

"DK" > wrote in message
...
> Jerry Sauk wrote:
>
> >
> > Of course not. It seems troll's arent willing to accept the
consequence's
> > of thier action's. Which is why thier troll's in the first pace. Just
stop
> > asking to be rmove from my kill-file, and we're ALL happy.
> >
> >
>
> How many of the 13 in your killfile asked to be removed?

I already said how many.

"Sqwertz" > wrote in message
...

> Now please **** off and die. Again.
>
> -sw

Anybody who knows anything about usenet steve is that it's FOAD. by typing
out all the words you waste bandwidth.

"Robert" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Jerry Sauk" > wrote in message
> ...
> >
>
> > NOBODY owns alt.food.fast-food. but for year's I have been the biggest
> > on-topic poster, which means I have a right to dictate that everyone
else
> > stay on-topic.
> >
> >
>
> Could you elaborate on biggest?
>
> With $15.00 meals at taco bell how could you not be the biggest!!
>
> Robert

That was exactly my point. By eating the most fast-food, I know the most
about it, and tehrefore am the best on-topic poster on the group.

"Michael "Dog3"" > wrote in message
5.247...
> "Jerry Sauk" >
> : in rec.food.cooking
>
> >
> > "Michael "Dog3"" > wrote in message
> > .250...
> >> "Jerry Sauk" >
> >> : in
> >> rec.food.cooking
> >>
> >>
> >> > NOBODY owns alt.food.fast-food. but for year's I have been the
> >> > biggest on-topic poster, which means I have a right to dictate that
> >> > everyone else stay on-topic.
> >>
> >> Ohhhh... Then you're like a few we have in RFC I suppose. They like
> >> to complain about off topic posts... until the off topic is about
> >> something they would like to talk about... Is that it? Besides, you
> >> have no rights on Usenet. None. None of us do.
> >>
> >> Michael
> >
> > WRONG. America is full of rights... ever hear of a little thing
> > called
> > the constitution? Free speech? I have the RIGHT on Usenet,
> > alt-fast.food specifically, to say how great fast-food is.
>
> Jerry, Jerry, Jerry... of course you have the right to express yourself.
> Yes you do. However, you do not have the right to censor others, OR, as
> you wrote yourself; "I have a right to dictate that everyone else stay
> on-topic". You don't have that right Jerry. No one has that right on
> Usenet unless the group is moderated. Now, if you want to play God, I
> suggest you spit out the Big Mac, get off your fat ass, and do the work
> it takes to start your own moderated group. When that is done, you will
> have the right to moderate posts as you see fit. The question is, will
> you be able to stand it... sitting there, stuffing your face and talking
> only to yourself?
>
> Michael
>

Im not censoring anyone. I'll I'm saying is, is if you want to talk
about british political things, take it to the british group and not
alt-fast-food.

I dont have time or the knowledge to make a moderated group, and I shouldn't
have to because we're all adults and AND SHOULD be able to keep[ it
on-topic. ourselves

"Jerry Sauk" > wrote in message
m...
>
> "DK" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Jerry Sauk wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > NOBODY owns alt.food.fast-food. but for year's I have been the
>> > biggest
>> > on-topic poster, which means I have a right to dictate that everyone
> else
>> > stay on-topic.
>> >
>> >
>>
>> There is no doubt you are the "biggest", however you can dictate NOTHING!
>>
>> -dk
>
> Ever hear of a little thing called Netiquette? I hjave a right to demand
> that it be followed.
>
>

Yes, and we have the right to completely ****ing ignore you. Hell, we might
even killfile you and act as though you're dead.

TFM®

"Jerry Sauk" > wrote in message
m...
>
> "DK" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Jerry Sauk wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > NOBODY owns alt.food.fast-food. but for year's I have been the
>> > biggest
>> > on-topic poster, which means I have a right to dictate that everyone
> else
>> > stay on-topic.
>> >
>> >
>>
>> There is no doubt you are the "biggest", however you can dictate NOTHING!
>>
>> -dk
>
> Ever hear of a little thing called Netiquette? I hjave a right to demand
> that it be followed.
>
Unfortunately you wont apply that to your self. A dozen years after High
school and your game is still juvenile

Jerry Sauk, ye filthy perfidious slave, o base hungarian wight, ye
pattered:

>
> "Sqwertz" > wrote in message
> ...
>
>> Now please **** off and die. Again.
>>
>> -sw
>
> Anybody who knows anything about usenet steve is that it's FOAD. by
> typing
> out all the words you waste bandwidth.


**** right off and die, you stupid ****.

--
alt.usenet.kooks
"We are arrant knaves all, believe none of us."
Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 1 [129]

Hammer of Thor: February 2007.
Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker:
September 2005, April 2006, January 2007, August 2008.
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, Official owner
and trainer of Bucky Breeder, August 2008.
Official Member: Cabal Obsidian Order COOSN-124-07-06660
Official Overseer of Kooks & Trolls in 24hoursupport.helpdesk

Member of:
Usenet Ruiner List
Top Assholes on the Net List
Most hated usenetizens of all time List
Cog in the AUK Hate Machine List

Find me on Google Maps: 24°39'47.13"S, 134°4'20.18"E

Join me for dinner. I'm cooking adulterated chef's pubic hairs on top of
beaten ears of corn and liver marinade, simmered in a gurgling pail with
a slew of exotic oddments of ginger and celery in disgusting ulcerated
eye discharge, a side of olives and a goblet of jellied ginger.

"Jerry Sauk" > wrote in message
m...
>
> "Sqwertz" > wrote in message
> ...
>
>> Now please **** off and die. Again.
>>
>> -sw
>
> Anybody who knows anything about usenet steve is that it's FOAD. by
> typing
> out all the words you waste bandwidth.
>
>

Talk about a waste of bandwidth.

-sw

On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 15:09:43 +0000, blake murphy wrote these lies,
denials, arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions, and/or
obfuscations:
> On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 12:45:48 GMT, Snarky wrote:
>> On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 19:12:13 -0400, DK wrote these lies, denials,
>> arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions, and/or obfuscations:
>>> Jerry Sauk wrote:
>>>> "Sqwertz" wrote...
>>>>> Jerry Sauk wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Didn't you read the Warning's?
>>>>> You mena the one that said From: Jerry Sauk >
>>>>> ??
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Can I write 400 words?
>>>>>> No. I don't have time for that.
>>>>> So, what if - by some act of Satan - would you do if *two* people
>>>>> mailed you their 200-word apologies? That would be 400 words.
>>>>>
>>>>> -sw
>>>>
>>>> I have plenty of time for that, if it's from two different people.
>>>> THAT'S why I made the 200-word limit in the first place.
>>>>
>>>> I see your still just as big of an idiot as you were before.
>>>
>>> So that's a *maximum* of 200 words? Limit *would* mean maximum so...
>>>
>>> I apologize for posting that Jerry was dead.
>>
>> So, is Jerry a flesh-eating ghoul, a regular zombie, or a vampire?
>
> i thought he didn't eat anything not served at taco bell or burger king.

So that'd be "flesh-eating ghoul", then.

--
__________________________________________________ ______________________
Hail Eris! mhm 29x21; TM#5; Anonymous Psycho Criminal #18
TEH USENETS BULLIE
http://www.runescape.com/
Join my RuneScape clan!
http://z11.invisionfree.com/Holy_Pre...abal/index.php
Full name of clan: Cabal of the Holy International Discordian Internet
And Usenet Terrorist Pretzel

Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle
Trainer of PorchMonkey4Life
http://www.screedbomb.info/porchie/

Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, June 2008
Hammer of Thor, July 2008

"But the other thing about her, she does know about international
relations because she is right up there in Alaska right next door to
Russia." -- Steve Doocy of FOX News was obviously a football player in
his early adulthood.

Hey, Aggie! Does this sound familiar?
Message-ID: >

"Marcella proves once again that she's an ignorant racist bigot." -- OK,
what race are Greeks, again? Aggie's so much more knowledgeable than I
about that sort of thing. Message-ID:
>

"It could be several." -- Aggie answers marc_CH's question about which
drugs Jamaican athletes such as Powell and Bolt have been taking.
Message-ID: >

"Only athletes on drugs win meddles. [...]

"And the funny thing is the Greek weightlifters were not winning meddles
even while on drugs. Clearly every single weightlifter that beat a Greek
weightlifter was taking more drugs than they were." -- Yeah, that's the
ticket, Aggie! Message-ID:
>

"Do Usenet posters on drugs not know how to spell 'medals'?" -- They
really don't, marc_CH. Message-ID:
>

"Not supporting me is equivalent to forfeiting your own rights." --
John D. Wentzky: Warrior For Your Freedumb! Message-ID:
>

"You cognatatively challenged fool!" -- According to Agamemnon, Stephen
Wilson is, apparently, highly ignorant about cognates, and so is anyone
who dares to disagree with him, in Message-ID:
>

"Is it still necrophilia if I'm conscious?" -- Owen Harper, "Dead Man
Walking", Torchwood (20/207)

Eric "Reality Check©"/"Vox"/"_ Prof. Jonez _" Ross is a racist and
homophobic liar, k00k, and paedophile, as well as a coprophage.

On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 14:58:12 -0500, Jerry Sauk wrote:

> Due to certain issue's I haven't had time to read all he unread messages
> from yesterday, especially with all the cross-posted and off-topic crap that
> once again is slamming the group.
>
> To be fair to everyone involved I am extended the deadline for apology's
> until a few hours after I get a chance to respond to all the message's.
> Probably sometime tomorow night. This WILL be the last chance.

oh, good. i'm always putting off my shopping 'til the last minute.

blake

"Michael "Dog3"" > wrote in message
5.247...
> "Jerry Sauk" >
> : in rec.food.cooking
>
>> Due to certain issue's I haven't had time to read all he unread
>> messages from yesterday, especially with all the cross-posted and
>> off-topic crap that once again is slamming the group.
>>
>> To be fair to everyone involved I am extended the deadline for
>> apology's until a few hours after I get a chance to respond to all the
>> message's. Probably sometime tomorow night. This WILL be the last
>> chance.
>
> You have a better chance of a Big Mac eating *you* than getting an
> apology.
> That "Special Sauce" bath is waiting for you.


Mmmmm....Bukakke!

TFM®

On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 18:01:15 -0500, Jerry Sauk wrote:

> "DK" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Jerry Sauk wrote:
>>> "Sqwertz" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> Jerry Sauk wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Didn't you read the Warning's?
>>>> You mena the one that said From: Jerry Sauk >
> ??
>>>>
>>>>>> Can I write 400 words?
>>>>> No. I don't have time for that.
>>>> So, what if - by some act of Satan - would you do if *two* people
> mailed
>>>> you their 200-word apologies? That would be 400 words.
>>>>
>>>> -sw
>>>
>>> I have plenty of time for that, if it's from two different people.
> THAT'S
>>> why I made the 200-word limit in the first place.
>>>
>>> I see your still just as big of an idiot as you were before.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> So that's a *maximum* of 200 words? Limit *would* mean maximum so...
>>
>> I apologize for posting that Jerry was dead.
>>
>> -dk
>
> It's MINUMUM 200 words, Dan. And a 200-word limit also.

gosh, 199 or 201 words and i go in the killfile? jeez, i don't know if my
newsreader software has a word-count function.

blake

blake murphy wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 14:58:12 -0500, Jerry Sauk wrote:
>
>> Due to certain issue's I haven't had time to read all he unread
>> messages from yesterday, especially with all the cross-posted and
>> off-topic crap that once again is slamming the group.
>>
>> To be fair to everyone involved I am extended the deadline for
>> apology's until a few hours after I get a chance to respond to all
>> the message's. Probably sometime tomorow night. This WILL be the
>> last chance.
>
> oh, good. i'm always putting off my shopping 'til the last minute.

<G> But, is that loon for real???

"Jerry Sauk" > wrote in message
m...
>
> "Sqwertz" > wrote in message
> ...
>
>> Now please **** off and die. Again.
>>
>> -sw
>
> Anybody who knows anything about usenet steve is that it's FOAD. by
> typing
> out all the words you waste bandwidth.
>
I know "Usenet Steve"

On Sun, 26 Oct 2008 07:49:39 GMT, Snarky wrote:

> On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 15:09:43 +0000, blake murphy wrote these lies,
> denials, arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions, and/or
> obfuscations:
>> On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 12:45:48 GMT, Snarky wrote:
>>> On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 19:12:13 -0400, DK wrote these lies, denials,
>>> arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions, and/or obfuscations:
>>>> Jerry Sauk wrote:
>>>>> "Sqwertz" wrote...
>>>>>> Jerry Sauk wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Didn't you read the Warning's?
>>>>>> You mena the one that said From: Jerry Sauk >
>>>>>> ??
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Can I write 400 words?
>>>>>>> No. I don't have time for that.
>>>>>> So, what if - by some act of Satan - would you do if *two* people
>>>>>> mailed you their 200-word apologies? That would be 400 words.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -sw
>>>>>
>>>>> I have plenty of time for that, if it's from two different people.
>>>>> THAT'S why I made the 200-word limit in the first place.
>>>>>
>>>>> I see your still just as big of an idiot as you were before.
>>>>
>>>> So that's a *maximum* of 200 words? Limit *would* mean maximum so...
>>>>
>>>> I apologize for posting that Jerry was dead.
>>>
>>> So, is Jerry a flesh-eating ghoul, a regular zombie, or a vampire?
>>
>> i thought he didn't eat anything not served at taco bell or burger king.
>
> So that'd be "flesh-eating ghoul", then.

i thought taco bell was big on textured vegetable protein.

your pal,
blake

On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 18:00:29 -0500, Jerry Sauk wrote:

> "DK" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Jerry Sauk wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> NOBODY owns alt.food.fast-food. but for year's I have been the biggest
>>> on-topic poster, which means I have a right to dictate that everyone
> else
>>> stay on-topic.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> There is no doubt you are the "biggest", however you can dictate NOTHING!
>>
>> -dk
>
> Ever hear of a little thing called Netiquette? I hjave a right to demand
> that it be followed.

and we have the right to laugh at your pipsqueakhood. aren't rights
wonderful?

blake

On Sun, 26 Oct 2008 12:44:00 GMT, Michael "Dog3" wrote:

> "Jerry Sauk" >
> m: in rec.food.cooking
>
>>
>> "DK" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> Jerry Sauk wrote:
>>>
>>> >
>>> > NOBODY owns alt.food.fast-food. but for year's I have been the
>>> > biggest on-topic poster, which means I have a right to dictate that
>>> > everyone
>> else
>>> > stay on-topic.
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>> There is no doubt you are the "biggest", however you can dictate
>>> NOTHING!
>>>
>>> -dk
>>
>> Ever hear of a little thing called Netiquette? I hjave a right to
>> demand that it be followed.
>
> The only right you have on Usenet, is the right to remain silent.
>
> Michael

i never post without an attorney present.

your pal,
blake

On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 18:05:48 -0500, Jerry Sauk wrote:

> "Sqwertz" > wrote in message
> ...
>
>> Now please **** off and die. Again.
>>
>> -sw
>
> Anybody who knows anything about usenet steve is that it's FOAD. by typing
> out all the words you waste bandwidth.

what, you have dial-up over a pay phone?

blake

On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 18:06:46 -0500, Jerry Sauk wrote:

> "Robert" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>> "Jerry Sauk" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>>
>>
>>> NOBODY owns alt.food.fast-food. but for year's I have been the biggest
>>> on-topic poster, which means I have a right to dictate that everyone
> else
>>> stay on-topic.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Could you elaborate on biggest?
>>
>> With $15.00 meals at taco bell how could you not be the biggest!!
>>
>> Robert
>
> That was exactly my point. By eating the most fast-food, I know the most
> about it, and tehrefore am the best on-topic poster on the group.

seen your feet lately?

blake

"blake murphy" > wrote in message
.. .
> On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 18:00:29 -0500, Jerry Sauk wrote:
>
>> "DK" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> Jerry Sauk wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> NOBODY owns alt.food.fast-food. but for year's I have been the
>>>> biggest
>>>> on-topic poster, which means I have a right to dictate that everyone
>> else
>>>> stay on-topic.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> There is no doubt you are the "biggest", however you can dictate
>>> NOTHING!
>>>
>>> -dk
>>
>> Ever hear of a little thing called Netiquette? I hjave a right to demand
>> that it be followed.
>
> and we have the right to laugh at your pipsqueakhood. aren't rights
> wonderful?
>

Yes they are.

"blake murphy" > wrote in message
...
> On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 18:01:15 -0500, Jerry Sauk wrote:
>
>> "DK" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> Jerry Sauk wrote:
>>>> "Sqwertz" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>> Jerry Sauk wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Didn't you read the Warning's?
>>>>> You mena the one that said From: Jerry Sauk >
>> ??
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Can I write 400 words?
>>>>>> No. I don't have time for that.
>>>>> So, what if - by some act of Satan - would you do if *two* people
>> mailed
>>>>> you their 200-word apologies? That would be 400 words.
>>>>>
>>>>> -sw
>>>>
>>>> I have plenty of time for that, if it's from two different people.
>> THAT'S
>>>> why I made the 200-word limit in the first place.
>>>>
>>>> I see your still just as big of an idiot as you were before.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> So that's a *maximum* of 200 words? Limit *would* mean maximum so...
>>>
>>> I apologize for posting that Jerry was dead.
>>>
>>> -dk
>>
>> It's MINUMUM 200 words, Dan. And a 200-word limit also.
>
> gosh, 199 or 201 words and i go in the killfile? jeez, i don't know if my
> newsreader software has a word-count function.
>

Oh. I hurt for this guy.

"TFM®" > wrote in message
. com...
>
>
> "Jerry Sauk" > wrote in message
> m...
> >
> > "DK" > wrote in message
> > ...
> >> Jerry Sauk wrote:
> >>
> >> >
> >> > NOBODY owns alt.food.fast-food. but for year's I have been the
> >> > biggest
> >> > on-topic poster, which means I have a right to dictate that everyone
> > else
> >> > stay on-topic.
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >> There is no doubt you are the "biggest", however you can dictate
NOTHING!
> >>
> >> -dk
> >
> > Ever hear of a little thing called Netiquette? I hjave a right to
demand
> > that it be followed.
> >
> >
>
> Yes, and we have the right to completely ****ing ignore you. Hell, we
might
> even killfile you and act as though you're dead.
>
> TFM®
>

Go right ahead. But I think the fact you haven't done it already means your
not serious.

"Jerry Sauk" > wrote in
m:

>
> "blake murphy" > wrote in message
> ...
>> On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 18:01:15 -0500, Jerry Sauk wrote:
>>
>> > "DK" > wrote in message
>> > ...
>> >> Jerry Sauk wrote:
>> >>> "Sqwertz" > wrote in message
>> >>> ...
>> >>>> Jerry Sauk wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> Didn't you read the Warning's?
>> >>>> You mena the one that said From: Jerry Sauk
>> >>>> >
>> > ??
>> >>>>
>> >>>>>> Can I write 400 words?
>> >>>>> No. I don't have time for that.
>> >>>> So, what if - by some act of Satan - would you do if *two*
>> >>>> people
>> > mailed
>> >>>> you their 200-word apologies? That would be 400 words.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> -sw
>> >>>
>> >>> I have plenty of time for that, if it's from two different
>> >>> people.
>> > THAT'S
>> >>> why I made the 200-word limit in the first place.
>> >>>
>> >>> I see your still just as big of an idiot as you were before.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >> So that's a *maximum* of 200 words? Limit *would* mean maximum
>> >> so...
>> >>
>> >> I apologize for posting that Jerry was dead.
>> >>
>> >> -dk
>> >
>> > It's MINUMUM 200 words, Dan. And a 200-word limit also.
>>
>> gosh, 199 or 201 words and i go in the killfile? jeez, i don't know
>> if my newsreader software has a word-count function.
>>
>> blake
>
> Not at all, I never kill-filed you in the first place. Apology's are
> only required from people who were previously in it for calling me
> dead.

Jerry! You ol' sonofagun!

I heard you were dead. Well waddya know?

Yet here you are, still doing a poor impression of a lame troll.


--
Black Metal ist Krieg

"blake murphy" > wrote in message
...
> On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 18:01:15 -0500, Jerry Sauk wrote:
>
> > "DK" > wrote in message
> > ...
> >> Jerry Sauk wrote:
> >>> "Sqwertz" > wrote in message
> >>> ...
> >>>> Jerry Sauk wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Didn't you read the Warning's?
> >>>> You mena the one that said From: Jerry Sauk >
> > ??
> >>>>
> >>>>>> Can I write 400 words?
> >>>>> No. I don't have time for that.
> >>>> So, what if - by some act of Satan - would you do if *two* people
> > mailed
> >>>> you their 200-word apologies? That would be 400 words.
> >>>>
> >>>> -sw
> >>>
> >>> I have plenty of time for that, if it's from two different people.
> > THAT'S
> >>> why I made the 200-word limit in the first place.
> >>>
> >>> I see your still just as big of an idiot as you were before.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> So that's a *maximum* of 200 words? Limit *would* mean maximum so...
> >>
> >> I apologize for posting that Jerry was dead.
> >>
> >> -dk
> >
> > It's MINUMUM 200 words, Dan. And a 200-word limit also.
>
> gosh, 199 or 201 words and i go in the killfile? jeez, i don't know if my
> newsreader software has a word-count function.
>
> blake

Not at all, I never kill-filed you in the first place. Apology's are only
required from people who were previously in it for calling me dead.

"blake murphy" > wrote in message
.. .
> On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 18:05:48 -0500, Jerry Sauk wrote:
>
> > "Sqwertz" > wrote in message
> > ...
> >
> >> Now please **** off and die. Again.
> >>
> >> -sw
> >
> > Anybody who knows anything about usenet steve is that it's FOAD. by
typing
> > out all the words you waste bandwidth.
>
> what, you have dial-up over a pay phone?
>
> blake

Hellooooooooo, Bandwith exists on ALL internet connections.

"Jerry Sauk" > wrote in message
m...
>
> "TFM®" > wrote in message
> . com...
>>
>>
>> "Jerry Sauk" > wrote in message
>> m...
>> >
>> > "DK" > wrote in message
>> > ...
>> >> Jerry Sauk wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> > NOBODY owns alt.food.fast-food. but for year's I have been the
>> >> > biggest
>> >> > on-topic poster, which means I have a right to dictate that everyone
>> > else
>> >> > stay on-topic.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> There is no doubt you are the "biggest", however you can dictate
> NOTHING!
>> >>
>> >> -dk
>> >
>> > Ever hear of a little thing called Netiquette? I hjave a right to
> demand
>> > that it be followed.
>> >
>> >
>>
>> Yes, and we have the right to completely ****ing ignore you. Hell, we
> might
>> even killfile you and act as though you're dead.
>>
>> TFM®
>>
>
> Go right ahead. But I think the fact you haven't done it already means
> your
> not serious.
>
>

Oh, I'm serious. I've already perfected the part where I act like you're
dead.

I actually know how to use my filters. I won't merely threaten you with a
killfile, I'll use it on you.

I thought you were supposed to die last night anyway? WTF happened?
(did you catch my spectacular bandwidth saving trick there?)

You ****ing nimrod.


TFM®

sf > wrote:

> On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 13:45:25 -0500, Sqwertz >
> wrote:
>
>>I took you out of the killfile to have some fun with you, but your
>>wit is on par with a 2nd grader.
>
> Thanks for the compliment.

<boggle> Now I'm reminded why I killfiled you.

-sw

cybercat > wrote:

> Oh. I hurt for this guy.

You may hurt if he's on top, but you won't feel anything inside.

-sw

blake murphy > wrote:

> seen your feet lately?

He uses a special tool just to wipe his ass.

-sw

Sqwertz, ye evil-eyed unfeeling fool, ye tread upon my patience, ye
inveigled:

> cybercat > wrote:
>
>> Oh. I hurt for this guy.
>
> You may hurt if he's on top, but you won't feel anything inside.


[^] Thus spake the voice of experience.

--
alt.usenet.kooks
"We are arrant knaves all, believe none of us."
Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 1 [129]

Hammer of Thor: February 2007.
Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker:
September 2005, April 2006, January 2007, August 2008.
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, Official owner
and trainer of Bucky Breeder, August 2008.
Official Member: Cabal Obsidian Order COOSN-124-07-06660
Official Overseer of Kooks & Trolls in 24hoursupport.helpdesk

Member of:
Usenet Ruiner List
Top Assholes on the Net List
Most hated usenetizens of all time List
Cog in the AUK Hate Machine List

Find me on Google Maps: 24°39'47.13"S, 134°4'20.18"E

Join me for dinner. I'm cooking half-raw chicken entrails accompanied by
aberrant pancreas on top of moldy earwax balls and banana extract under
tough sea otter nostril with garlic preserve and profaned pimple with
ghastly erupting pimples and tendon sauce, simmered in a cooling skillet
containing squirming assortment of unidentified floaty bits and
cartilage with chunks of banana pepper in contaminated melted cheese, a
side of camel eyeballs and a can of amniotic fluid.

"Sqwertz" > wrote in message
...
> blake murphy > wrote:
>
>> seen your feet lately?
>
> He uses a special tool just to wipe his ass.
>
> -sw

Who would that special tool be?

TFM®

TFM® > wrote:

> "Sqwertz" > wrote in message
> ...
>> blake murphy > wrote:
>>
>>> seen your feet lately?
>>
>> He uses a special tool just to wipe his ass.
>
> Who would that special tool be?

It's an enlarged version of the old WaterPik oral cleaning system.
(Holy crap - they still sell them! They sure look a lot different
than the one we had 40 years ago)

-sw

Jerry Sauk > writes:

> Ever hear of a little thing called Netiquette?
> I hjave a right to demand that it be followed.


Wrong; you have the right to *ask* that it be
followed. Your sphere of influence terminates
at the end of your spunk-encrusted fist.



Geoff

--
"If you take a Republican and shoot out major portions
of his brains, I guess it's not too surprising you might
end up with a Democrat." -- Rusty Sanders on James Brady

Jerry Sauk > writes:

> It's MINUMUM 200 words, Dan. And a 200-word limit also.


Reminds me of a tiwn I passed through once. The place was
so small, the "entering" and "leaving" signs were mounted
on the same pole.

Thankyew, thankyew verramuch. I'll be here all week.

Seriously, though, Jerry, by having the minimum-length
and maximum-length requirements the same, you run the
considerable risk of forcing people tro abandon proper
grammar and syntax in order to meet your specifications.
What if somebody had written a wonder, sincere apology
which turned out to be 201 words, and they had to omit
an instance of the article "the?" When you finally do
shuffle off this mortal coil for real, do you want to
be remembered as someone who tacitly encouraged sunstan-
dared English?



Geoff

--
"If you take a Republican and shoot out major portions
of his brains, I guess it's not too surprising you might
end up with a Democrat." -- Rusty Sanders on James Brady

Jerry Sauk > writes:

> Anybody who knows anything about usenet steve is that
> it's FOAD. by typing out all the words you waste
> bandwidth.


How 1990. What next, flaming people for "wasting bandwidth"
because they have .signatures that are longer than the
regulation four lines?



Geoff

--
"If you take a Republican and shoot out major portions
of his brains, I guess it's not too surprising you might
end up with a Democrat." -- Rusty Sanders on James Brady

On Sun, 26 Oct 2008 16:50:51 +0000, blake murphy wrote these lies,
denials, arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions, and/or
obfuscations:

> On Sun, 26 Oct 2008 07:49:39 GMT, Snarky wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 15:09:43 +0000, blake murphy wrote these lies,
>> denials, arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions, and/or
>> obfuscations:
>>> On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 12:45:48 GMT, Snarky wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 19:12:13 -0400, DK wrote these lies, denials,
>>>> arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions, and/or obfuscations:
>>>>> Jerry Sauk wrote:
>>>>>> "Sqwertz" wrote...
>>>>>>> Jerry Sauk wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Didn't you read the Warning's?
>>>>>>> You mena the one that said From: Jerry Sauk
>>>>>>> > ??
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Can I write 400 words?
>>>>>>>> No. I don't have time for that.
>>>>>>> So, what if - by some act of Satan - would you do if *two* people
>>>>>>> mailed you their 200-word apologies? That would be 400 words.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -sw
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have plenty of time for that, if it's from two different people.
>>>>>> THAT'S why I made the 200-word limit in the first place.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I see your still just as big of an idiot as you were before.
>>>>>
>>>>> So that's a *maximum* of 200 words? Limit *would* mean maximum so...
>>>>>
>>>>> I apologize for posting that Jerry was dead.
>>>>
>>>> So, is Jerry a flesh-eating ghoul, a regular zombie, or a vampire?
>>>
>>> i thought he didn't eat anything not served at taco bell or burger
>>> king.
>>
>> So that'd be "flesh-eating ghoul", then.
>
> i thought taco bell was big on textured vegetable protein.

Burger King, however...not so much.

--
__________________________________________________ ______________________
Hail Eris! mhm 29x21; TM#5; Anonymous Psycho Criminal #18
TEH USENETS BULLIE
http://www.runescape.com/
Join my RuneScape clan!
http://z11.invisionfree.com/Holy_Pre...abal/index.php
Full name of clan: Cabal of the Holy International Discordian Internet
And Usenet Terrorist Pretzel

Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle
Trainer of PorchMonkey4Life
http://www.screedbomb.info/porchie/

Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, June 2008
Hammer of Thor, July 2008

"But the other thing about her, she does know about international
relations because she is right up there in Alaska right next door to
Russia." -- Steve Doocy of FOX News was obviously a football player in
his early adulthood.

Hey, Aggie! Does this sound familiar?
Message-ID: >

"Marcella proves once again that she's an ignorant racist bigot." -- OK,
what race are Greeks, again? Aggie's so much more knowledgeable than I
about that sort of thing. Message-ID:
>

"It could be several." -- Aggie answers marc_CH's question about which
drugs Jamaican athletes such as Powell and Bolt have been taking.
Message-ID: >

"Only athletes on drugs win meddles. [...]

"And the funny thing is the Greek weightlifters were not winning meddles
even while on drugs. Clearly every single weightlifter that beat a Greek
weightlifter was taking more drugs than they were." -- Yeah, that's the
ticket, Aggie! Message-ID:
>

"Do Usenet posters on drugs not know how to spell 'medals'?" -- They
really don't, marc_CH. Message-ID:
>

"Not supporting me is equivalent to forfeiting your own rights." --
John D. Wentzky: Warrior For Your Freedumb! Message-ID:
>

"You cognatatively challenged fool!" -- According to Agamemnon, Stephen
Wilson is, apparently, highly ignorant about cognates, and so is anyone
who dares to disagree with him, in Message-ID:
>

"Is it still necrophilia if I'm conscious?" -- Owen Harper, "Dead Man
Walking", Torchwood (20/207)

Eric "Reality Check©"/"Vox"/"_ Prof. Jonez _" Ross is a racist and
homophobic liar, k00k, and paedophile, as well as a coprophage.

On Sun, 26 Oct 2008 15:52:12 -0600, Jerry Sauk wrote:

> "blake murphy" > wrote in message
> .. .
>> On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 18:05:48 -0500, Jerry Sauk wrote:
>>
>>> "Sqwertz" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>
>>>> Now please **** off and die. Again.
>>>>
>>>> -sw
>>>
>>> Anybody who knows anything about usenet steve is that it's FOAD. by
> typing
>>> out all the words you waste bandwidth.
>>
>> what, you have dial-up over a pay phone?
>>
>> blake
>
> Hellooooooooo, Bandwith exists on ALL internet connections.

and the difference between four letters and four words is measured in what,
nanoseconds? picoseconds?

d * i * p * s * h * i * t !

blake

On Oct 25, 2:30*pm, "Ophelia" > wrote:
> Sqwertz wrote:
> > Are you going to sit outside all week waiting for the Great Pumpkin
> > next week?
>
> > You'd stand a better chance catching a glimpse of him than you would
> > getting an apology.
>
> LOL's <g>
===================================

I AM the Great Pumpkin.
Lynn in Fargo
Some people have body type like Pears. Some are Apples . . . I am the
Pumpkin

"Snarky" > wrote in message
news nb.ggghd.bcb.cem.fi...
> On Sun, 26 Oct 2008 16:50:51 +0000, blake murphy wrote these lies,
> denials, arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions, and/or
> obfuscations:
>
> > On Sun, 26 Oct 2008 07:49:39 GMT, Snarky wrote:
> >
> >> On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 15:09:43 +0000, blake murphy wrote these lies,
> >> denials, arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions, and/or
> >> obfuscations:
> >>> On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 12:45:48 GMT, Snarky wrote:
> >>>> On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 19:12:13 -0400, DK wrote these lies, denials,
> >>>> arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions, and/or obfuscations:
> >>>>> Jerry Sauk wrote:
> >>>>>> "Sqwertz" wrote...
> >>>>>>> Jerry Sauk wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Didn't you read the Warning's?
> >>>>>>> You mena the one that said From: Jerry Sauk
> >>>>>>> > ??
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Can I write 400 words?
> >>>>>>>> No. I don't have time for that.
> >>>>>>> So, what if - by some act of Satan - would you do if *two* people
> >>>>>>> mailed you their 200-word apologies? That would be 400 words.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> -sw
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I have plenty of time for that, if it's from two different people.
> >>>>>> THAT'S why I made the 200-word limit in the first place.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I see your still just as big of an idiot as you were before.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> So that's a *maximum* of 200 words? Limit *would* mean maximum
so...
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I apologize for posting that Jerry was dead.
> >>>>
> >>>> So, is Jerry a flesh-eating ghoul, a regular zombie, or a vampire?
> >>>
> >>> i thought he didn't eat anything not served at taco bell or burger
> >>> king.
> >>
> >> So that'd be "flesh-eating ghoul", then.
> >
> > i thought taco bell was big on textured vegetable protein.
>
> Burger King, however...not so much.

And what exactly is textured vegetable protein.