"blake murphy" > wrote in message
.. .
> On Sun, 26 Oct 2008 15:52:12 -0600, Jerry Sauk wrote:
>
> > "blake murphy" > wrote in message
> > .. .
> >> On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 18:05:48 -0500, Jerry Sauk wrote:
> >>
> >>> "Sqwertz" > wrote in message
> >>> ...
> >>>
> >>>> Now please **** off and die. Again.
> >>>>
> >>>> -sw
> >>>
> >>> Anybody who knows anything about usenet steve is that it's FOAD. by
> > typing
> >>> out all the words you waste bandwidth.
> >>
> >> what, you have dial-up over a pay phone?
> >>
> >> blake
> >
> > Hellooooooooo, Bandwith exists on ALL internet connections.
>
> and the difference between four letters and four words is measured in
what,
> nanoseconds? picoseconds?
>
> d * i * p * s * h * i * t !
>
> blake

The POINT was, is that he was wasting bandwidth. It all adds up.

"TFM®" > wrote in message
. com...
>
>
> "Jerry Sauk" > wrote in message
> m...
> >
> > "TFM®" > wrote in message
> > . com...
> >>
> >>
> >> "Jerry Sauk" > wrote in message
> >> m...
> >> >
> >> > "DK" > wrote in message
> >> > ...
> >> >> Jerry Sauk wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >> > NOBODY owns alt.food.fast-food. but for year's I have been the
> >> >> > biggest
> >> >> > on-topic poster, which means I have a right to dictate that
everyone
> >> > else
> >> >> > stay on-topic.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> There is no doubt you are the "biggest", however you can dictate
> > NOTHING!
> >> >>
> >> >> -dk
> >> >
> >> > Ever hear of a little thing called Netiquette? I hjave a right to
> > demand
> >> > that it be followed.
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >> Yes, and we have the right to completely ****ing ignore you. Hell, we
> > might
> >> even killfile you and act as though you're dead.
> >>
> >> TFM®
> >>
> >
> > Go right ahead. But I think the fact you haven't done it already means
> > your
> > not serious.
> >
> >
>
> Oh, I'm serious. I've already perfected the part where I act like you're
> dead.
>
> I actually know how to use my filters. I won't merely threaten you with a
> killfile, I'll use it on you.
>
> I thought you were supposed to die last night anyway? WTF happened?
> (did you catch my spectacular bandwidth saving trick there?)
>
> You ****ing nimrod.
>
>
> TFM®
>

GOOD! Then I know you'll never reply to any more of my post's, INCLUDING
THIS ONE!!

"Geoff Miller" > wrote in message
...
>
>
> Jerry Sauk > writes:
>
> > Ever hear of a little thing called Netiquette?
> > I hjave a right to demand that it be followed.
>
>
> Wrong; you have the right to *ask* that it be
> followed. Your sphere of influence terminates
> at the end of your spunk-encrusted fist.
>
>
>
> Geoff

Asking and demanding are the same thing Geoff, except one is a little
stronger asking.

But just to avoid getting dragged into another argument with you, I'll
change it to "I strongly ask" netequette to be followed.

"Geoff Miller" > wrote in message
et...
>
>
> Jerry Sauk > writes:
>
> > Anybody who knows anything about usenet steve is that
> > it's FOAD. by typing out all the words you waste
> > bandwidth.
>
>
> How 1990. What next, flaming people for "wasting bandwidth"
> because they have .signatures that are longer than the
> regulation four lines?
>
>
>
> Geoff

Oh I see, yet people can flame me for not trimming post's.

"Jerry Sauk" > wrote in message
news
>
> "Geoff Miller" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>>
>> Jerry Sauk > writes:
>>
>> > Ever hear of a little thing called Netiquette?
>> > I hjave a right to demand that it be followed.
>>
>>
>> Wrong; you have the right to *ask* that it be
>> followed. Your sphere of influence terminates
>> at the end of your spunk-encrusted fist.
>>
>>
>>
>> Geoff
>
> Asking and demanding are the same thing Geoff, except one is a little
> stronger asking.
>
> But just to avoid getting dragged into another argument with you, I'll
> change it to "I strongly ask" netequette to be followed.
>
>


And I strongly reply, "Go **** yerself!"

TFM®

"Jerry Sauk" > wrote in message
news
>
> "Geoff Miller" > wrote in message
> et...
>>
>>
>> Jerry Sauk > writes:
>>
>> > Anybody who knows anything about usenet steve is that
>> > it's FOAD. by typing out all the words you waste
>> > bandwidth.
>>
>>
>> How 1990. What next, flaming people for "wasting bandwidth"
>> because they have .signatures that are longer than the
>> regulation four lines?
>>
>>
>>
>> Geoff
>
> Oh I see, yet people can flame me for not trimming post's.
>
>

Yes, because not trimming is retarded behavior. There is no concern for
bandwidth anymore. This is the age of high speed.
I download several movies nightly while I'm poking you with bandwidth
wasting sentences that you can barely comprehend.

If you had a real job and your own place you could have high speed access
too.

As it is, you're stuck in the basement on dialup for life. Good thing
that's not too long.


TFM®

blake murphy wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 18:01:15 -0500, Jerry Sauk wrote:
>
>> "DK" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> Jerry Sauk wrote:
>>>> "Sqwertz" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>> Jerry Sauk wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Didn't you read the Warning's?
>>>>> You mena the one that said From: Jerry Sauk >
>> ??
>>>>>>> Can I write 400 words?
>>>>>> No. I don't have time for that.
>>>>> So, what if - by some act of Satan - would you do if *two* people
>> mailed
>>>>> you their 200-word apologies? That would be 400 words.
>>>>>
>>>>> -sw
>>>> I have plenty of time for that, if it's from two different people.
>> THAT'S
>>>> why I made the 200-word limit in the first place.
>>>>
>>>> I see your still just as big of an idiot as you were before.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> So that's a *maximum* of 200 words? Limit *would* mean maximum so...
>>>
>>> I apologize for posting that Jerry was dead.
>>>
>>> -dk
>> It's MINUMUM 200 words, Dan. And a 200-word limit also.
>
> gosh, 199 or 201 words and i go in the killfile? jeez, i don't know if my
> newsreader software has a word-count function.
>
> blake

Jerry can't count. No worries.

-sw

On Sun, 26 Oct 2008 18:10:20 -0500, Sqwertz >
wrote:

>sf > wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 13:45:25 -0500, Sqwertz >
>> wrote:
>>
>>>I took you out of the killfile to have some fun with you, but your
>>>wit is on par with a 2nd grader.
>>
>> Thanks for the compliment.
>
><boggle> Now I'm reminded why I killfiled you.
>
Yet you can't bring yourself to kf me again.
Face it. I'm a diva and you're my fan!

WooHoo! You're mine, all mine AND you do toilets.




--
I never worry about diets. The only carrots that
interest me are the number of carats in a diamond.

Mae West

On Sun, 26 Oct 2008 16:46:47 GMT, blake murphy
> wrote:

>gosh, 199 or 201 words and i go in the killfile? jeez, i don't know if my
>newsreader software has a word-count function.

LOL! Compose it in your word processor and paste it into your news
reader (check the word count there). Sheesh, do I have to tell you
everything? The real question is "Who's will compose an apology"?


--
I never worry about diets. The only carrots that
interest me are the number of carats in a diamond.

Mae West

"Jerry Sauk" > wrote in
news
>
> "Snarky" > wrote in message
> news > tp.hc nb.ggghd.bcb.cem.fi...
>> On Sun, 26 Oct 2008 16:50:51 +0000, blake murphy wrote these lies,
>> denials, arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions, and/or
>> obfuscations:
>>
>> > On Sun, 26 Oct 2008 07:49:39 GMT, Snarky wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 15:09:43 +0000, blake murphy wrote these lies,
>> >> denials, arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions, and/or
>> >> obfuscations:
>> >>> On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 12:45:48 GMT, Snarky wrote:
>> >>>> On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 19:12:13 -0400, DK wrote these lies,
>> >>>> denials, arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions, and/or
>> >>>> obfuscations:
>> >>>>> Jerry Sauk wrote:
>> >>>>>> "Sqwertz" wrote...
>> >>>>>>> Jerry Sauk wrote:
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> Didn't you read the Warning's?
>> >>>>>>> You mena the one that said From: Jerry Sauk
>> >>>>>>> > ??
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> Can I write 400 words?
>> >>>>>>>> No. I don't have time for that.
>> >>>>>>> So, what if - by some act of Satan - would you do if *two*
>> >>>>>>> people mailed you their 200-word apologies? That would be
>> >>>>>>> 400 words.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> -sw
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> I have plenty of time for that, if it's from two different
>> >>>>>> people. THAT'S why I made the 200-word limit in the first
>> >>>>>> place.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> I see your still just as big of an idiot as you were before.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> So that's a *maximum* of 200 words? Limit *would* mean maximum
> so...
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> I apologize for posting that Jerry was dead.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> So, is Jerry a flesh-eating ghoul, a regular zombie, or a
>> >>>> vampire?
>> >>>
>> >>> i thought he didn't eat anything not served at taco bell or
>> >>> burger king.
>> >>
>> >> So that'd be "flesh-eating ghoul", then.
>> >
>> > i thought taco bell was big on textured vegetable protein.
>>
>> Burger King, however...not so much.
>
> And what exactly is textured vegetable protein.

You call it your brain.


--
Black Metal ist Krieg

On Sun, 26 Oct 2008 23:39:33 -0500, (Geoff Miller)
wrote:

>Reminds me of a tiwn I passed through once. The place was
>so small, the "entering" and "leaving" signs were mounted
>on the same pole.
>
>Thankyew, thankyew verramuch. I'll be here all week.

LOL, it *was* good. Reminded me of the wide spot in the road where I
grew up (a mile or two out of town).


--
I never worry about diets. The only carrots that
interest me are the number of carats in a diamond.

Mae West

Jerry Sauk > writes:

> Asking and demanding are the same thing Geoff, except
> one is a little stronger asking.

When you "ask" someone for something, you express your
preference while leaving their compliance up to their
discretion.

When you *demand* something of someone, though, you don't
leave them the option of saying "no." You're essentially
telling them that they have no choice.


> But just to avoid getting dragged into another argument
> with you, I'll change it to "I strongly ask" netequette
> to be followed.

I knew I could count on you to see reason, Jerry.



Geoff

--
"If you take a Republican and shoot out major portions
of his brains, I guess it's not too surprising you might
end up with a Democrat." -- Rusty Sanders on James Brady

Jerry Sauk > writes:

: How 1990. What next, flaming people for "wasting bandwidth"
: because they have .signatures that are longer than the
: regulation four lines?

> Oh I see, yet people can flame me for not trimming post's.


The crucial difference, Jerry, is that I don't flame you for
not trimming posts *on the basis that you're wasting bandwidth.*
I do it on the basis that you force readers to scroll down past
material that they've already read at least once before.

It's a matter of courtesy toward your readers, in other words.
I couldn't give less of a **** about bandwidth. It's kind of
like how I appreciate the idea of a car that gets good gas
mileage because it would cost me less money to operate, even
though I don't give a rip about the environment or my "carbon
footprint." It's all about rational self-interest. Have you
ever read any Ayn Rand, Jerry?

(Didn't you just say that you didn't want to get into any more
arguments with me?)



Geoff

--
"If you take a Republican and shoot out major portions
of his brains, I guess it's not too surprising you might
end up with a Democrat." -- Rusty Sanders on James Brady

On Mon, 27 Oct 2008 18:38:07 -0400, DK wrote:

> blake murphy wrote:
>> On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 18:01:15 -0500, Jerry Sauk wrote:
>>
>>> "DK" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> Jerry Sauk wrote:
>>>>> "Sqwertz" > wrote in message
>>>>> ...
>>>>>> Jerry Sauk wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Didn't you read the Warning's?
>>>>>> You mena the one that said From: Jerry Sauk >
>>> ??
>>>>>>>> Can I write 400 words?
>>>>>>> No. I don't have time for that.
>>>>>> So, what if - by some act of Satan - would you do if *two* people
>>> mailed
>>>>>> you their 200-word apologies? That would be 400 words.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -sw
>>>>> I have plenty of time for that, if it's from two different people.
>>> THAT'S
>>>>> why I made the 200-word limit in the first place.
>>>>>
>>>>> I see your still just as big of an idiot as you were before.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> So that's a *maximum* of 200 words? Limit *would* mean maximum so...
>>>>
>>>> I apologize for posting that Jerry was dead.
>>>>
>>>> -dk
>>> It's MINUMUM 200 words, Dan. And a 200-word limit also.
>>
>> gosh, 199 or 201 words and i go in the killfile? jeez, i don't know if my
>> newsreader software has a word-count function.
>>
>> blake
>
> Jerry can't count. No worries.
>
> -sw

<snort>

your pal,
blake

On Mon, 27 Oct 2008 19:38:36 -0700, sf wrote:

> On Sun, 26 Oct 2008 16:46:47 GMT, blake murphy
> > wrote:
>
>>gosh, 199 or 201 words and i go in the killfile? jeez, i don't know if my
>>newsreader software has a word-count function.
>
> LOL! Compose it in your word processor and paste it into your news
> reader (check the word count there). Sheesh, do I have to tell you
> everything? The real question is "Who's will compose an apology"?

several bush speechwriters will soon be unemployed. i'm sure they would be
able to come up with the appropriate level of bullshit. they can write to
fit the space, too.

your pal,
blake

On Mon, 27 Oct 2008 17:12:55 -0400, TFM® wrote:

> "Jerry Sauk" > wrote in message
> news
>>
>> "Geoff Miller" > wrote in message
>> et...
>>>
>>>
>>> Jerry Sauk > writes:
>>>
>>> > Anybody who knows anything about usenet steve is that
>>> > it's FOAD. by typing out all the words you waste
>>> > bandwidth.
>>>
>>>
>>> How 1990. What next, flaming people for "wasting bandwidth"
>>> because they have .signatures that are longer than the
>>> regulation four lines?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Geoff
>>
>> Oh I see, yet people can flame me for not trimming post's.
>>
>>
>
> Yes, because not trimming is retarded behavior. There is no concern for
> bandwidth anymore. This is the age of high speed.
> I download several movies nightly while I'm poking you with bandwidth
> wasting sentences that you can barely comprehend.
>
> If you had a real job and your own place you could have high speed access
> too.
>
> As it is, you're stuck in the basement on dialup for life. Good thing
> that's not too long.
>
>
> TFM®

but jerry says fast food is healthy! him and his 300 pounds might live
forever!

your pal,
blake

On Mon, 27 Oct 2008 21:58:13 -0500, Geoff Miller wrote:

> Jerry Sauk > writes:
>
>: How 1990. What next, flaming people for "wasting bandwidth"
>: because they have .signatures that are longer than the
>: regulation four lines?
>
>> Oh I see, yet people can flame me for not trimming post's.
>
>
> The crucial difference, Jerry, is that I don't flame you for
> not trimming posts *on the basis that you're wasting bandwidth.*
> I do it on the basis that you force readers to scroll down past
> material that they've already read at least once before.
>
> It's a matter of courtesy toward your readers, in other words.
> I couldn't give less of a **** about bandwidth. It's kind of
> like how I appreciate the idea of a car that gets good gas
> mileage because it would cost me less money to operate, even
> though I don't give a rip about the environment or my "carbon
> footprint." It's all about rational self-interest. Have you
> ever read any Ayn Rand, Jerry?

no hold on just a second. jerry may be a dipshit, but he hasn't descended
to randian levels of dipshittery. that takes real talent.

your pal,
alan

DK wrote:
> blake murphy wrote:
>> On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 18:01:15 -0500, Jerry Sauk wrote:
>>
>>> "DK" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> Jerry Sauk wrote:
>>>>> "Sqwertz" > wrote in message
>>>>> ...
>>>>>> Jerry Sauk wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Didn't you read the Warning's?
>>>>>> You mena the one that said From: Jerry Sauk >
>>> ??
>>>>>>>> Can I write 400 words?
>>>>>>> No. I don't have time for that.
>>>>>> So, what if - by some act of Satan - would you do if *two* people
>>> mailed
>>>>>> you their 200-word apologies? That would be 400 words.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -sw
>>>>> I have plenty of time for that, if it's from two different people.
>>> THAT'S
>>>>> why I made the 200-word limit in the first place.
>>>>>
>>>>> I see your still just as big of an idiot as you were before.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> So that's a *maximum* of 200 words? Limit *would* mean maximum so...
>>>>
>>>> I apologize for posting that Jerry was dead.
>>>>
>>>> -dk
>>> It's MINUMUM 200 words, Dan. And a 200-word limit also.
>>
>> gosh, 199 or 201 words and i go in the killfile? jeez, i don't know
>> if my
>> newsreader software has a word-count function.
>>
>> blake
>
> Jerry can't count. No worries.
>
> -sw

Jerry does have some special skills, he can list every ingredient that
Taco Bell uses. I don't know of anyone who's capable of doing that.

blake murphy wrote:

> but jerry says fast food is healthy! him and his 300 pounds might live
> forever!

I've always wondered, that if Jerry were to be the guest of honor at the
round table in Donner Pass, would he taste like a colostomy bag?

-sw

Jerry Sauk wrote:
> "blake murphy" > wrote in message
> .. .
>> On Sun, 26 Oct 2008 15:52:12 -0600, Jerry Sauk wrote:
>>
>>> "blake murphy" > wrote in message
>>> .. .
>>>> On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 18:05:48 -0500, Jerry Sauk wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> "Sqwertz" > wrote in message
>>>>> ...
>>>>>
>>>>>> Now please **** off and die. Again.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -sw
>>>>> Anybody who knows anything about usenet steve is that it's FOAD. by
>>> typing
>>>>> out all the words you waste bandwidth.
>>>> what, you have dial-up over a pay phone?
>>>>
>>>> blake
>>> Hellooooooooo, Bandwith exists on ALL internet connections.
>> and the difference between four letters and four words is measured in
> what,
>> nanoseconds? picoseconds?
>>
>> d * i * p * s * h * i * t !
>>
>> blake
>
> The POINT was, is that he was wasting bandwidth. It all adds up.
>
>

So does all your off-topic, non-snip, cross-posting filling up news
server hard drives all over the world.

Sqwertz wrote:
> blake murphy wrote:
>
>> but jerry says fast food is healthy! him and his 300 pounds might live
>> forever!
>
> I've always wondered, that if Jerry were to be the guest of honor at the
> round table in Donner Pass, would he taste like a colostomy bag?
>
> -sw

You wonder too much.

Sqwertz wrote:
> blake murphy wrote:
>
>> but jerry says fast food is healthy! him and his 300 pounds might live
>> forever!
>
> I've always wondered, that if Jerry were to be the guest of honor at the
> round table in Donner Pass, would he taste like a colostomy bag?

Err.... A burrito Supreme, I mean.

-sw

Jerry Sock wrote:

> We love how you are always going on about trolls and your "net enemies" and
> such but most of these are sockpuppets of your *own* invention, Steve...

BwhahahahahahahahahHAHAHAH!

Yep - They're all me.

> How's the loo bizness going, Steve...pretty slow I'd imagine...how many
> trolling personas have you kept going with THIS week...???

Including you? You do know that you're one of my sock puppets too, right?

> Steve gets REAL ****ed off when he's caught red - handed with his
> sockpuppoons. For proof google the thread I started a few months ago
> entitled "The Three Faces of (st)Eve"...

Now _THIS_ is funny. I didn't even participate in that thread - I
didn't even see it until now.

But it looks like you and Gregory (the Queen of Drag Queens) were
accusing me of being two other long-lost posters. And contrary to your
intentions, people actually started *praising* me for my alleged posts.

<http://groups.google.com/group/rec.food.cooking/browse_frm/thread/ad83e8b26f212ac8/ce7022737bddf291?hl=en&lnk=st&q=the+three+faces++g roup%3Arec.food.cooking#ce7022737bddf291>

Not only did it backfire on you and Greg back then, but it just
backfired on you AGAIN now by brining it up as an example of my being
angry at being caught "red-handed".

<cackle> You're such the dipshit. Are you Jerry's mother by chance?

-sw

Sqwertz wrote:

> sf > wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 24 Oct 2008 05:09:26 -0500, Sqwertz >
> > wrote:
> >
> >>sf > wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 13:38:56 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
> >>> > wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>Steve's many m,ultiple sock-puppet account's he used to get around it.
> >>>>
> >>> Yet he gets all ****ed off if anyone accuses him of it, because he
> >>> "signs his name".
> >>
> >>Huh?
> >>
> >>Ahh - never mind. Everybody signs my name (-sw), in case you didn't
> >>notice. We (or is it just me?) do that just to **** you off and
> >>make you moan.
> >
> > Oh yeah, you're a victim. Suuure.
>
> You're such a mindless ****. Obviously the signing of my name is
> endorsed by myself.


We love how you are always going on about trolls and your "net enemies" and
such but most of these are sockpuppets of your *own* invention, Steve...


> I took you out of the killfile to have some fun with you, but your
> wit is on par with a 2nd grader.


How's the loo bizness going, Steve...pretty slow I'd imagine...how many
trolling personas have you kept going with THIS week...???

Steve gets REAL ****ed off when he's caught red - handed with his
sockpuppoons. For proof google the thread I started a few months ago
entitled "The Three Faces of (st)Eve"...



--
Best
Gre....errr... '-sw'...???

" I find Greg Morrow lowbrow, witless, and obnoxious. For him to claim that
we are some
kind of comedy team turns my stomach."
- "cybercat" to me on rec.food.cooking

Sqwertz wrote:
> Jerry Sock wrote:
>
>> We love how you are always going on about trolls and your "net
>> enemies" and such but most of these are sockpuppets of your *own*
>> invention, Steve...
>
> BwhahahahahahahahahHAHAHAH!
>
> Yep - They're all me.
>
>> How's the loo bizness going, Steve...pretty slow I'd imagine...how
>> many trolling personas have you kept going with THIS week...???
>
> Including you? You do know that you're one of my sock puppets too,
> right?
>> Steve gets REAL ****ed off when he's caught red - handed with his
>> sockpuppoons. For proof google the thread I started a few months ago
>> entitled "The Three Faces of (st)Eve"...
>
> Now _THIS_ is funny. I didn't even participate in that thread - I
> didn't even see it until now.
>
> But it looks like you and Gregory (the Queen of Drag Queens) were
> accusing me of being two other long-lost posters. And contrary to
> your intentions, people actually started *praising* me for my alleged
> posts.
> <http://groups.google.com/group/rec.food.cooking/browse_frm/thread/ad83e8b26f212ac8/ce7022737bddf291?hl=en&lnk=st&q=the+three+faces++g roup%3Arec.food.cooking#ce7022737bddf291>
>
> Not only did it backfire on you and Greg back then, but it just
> backfired on you AGAIN now by brining it up as an example of my being
> angry at being caught "red-handed".
>
> <cackle> You're such the dipshit. Are you Jerry's mother by chance?

I love the way these people very cleverly guess it is you, especially when
you sign it

Ophelia wrote:

> Sqwertz wrote:
> > Jerry Sock wrote:
> >
> >> We love how you are always going on about trolls and your "net
> >> enemies" and such but most of these are sockpuppets of your *own*
> >> invention, Steve...
> >
> > BwhahahahahahahahahHAHAHAH!
> >
> > Yep - They're all me.
> >
> >> How's the loo bizness going, Steve...pretty slow I'd imagine...how
> >> many trolling personas have you kept going with THIS week...???
> >
> > Including you? You do know that you're one of my sock puppets too,
> > right?
> >> Steve gets REAL ****ed off when he's caught red - handed with his
> >> sockpuppoons. For proof google the thread I started a few months ago
> >> entitled "The Three Faces of (st)Eve"...
> >
> > Now _THIS_ is funny. I didn't even participate in that thread - I
> > didn't even see it until now.
> >
> > But it looks like you and Gregory (the Queen of Drag Queens) were
> > accusing me of being two other long-lost posters. And contrary to
> > your intentions, people actually started *praising* me for my alleged
> > posts.
> >
<http://groups.google.com/group/rec.f...read/ad83e8b26
f212ac8/ce7022737bddf291?hl=en&lnk=st&q=the+three+faces++g roup%3Arec.food.co
oking#ce7022737bddf291>
> >
> > Not only did it backfire on you and Greg back then, but it just
> > backfired on you AGAIN now by brining it up as an example of my being
> > angry at being caught "red-handed".
> >
> > <cackle> You're such the dipshit. Are you Jerry's mother by chance?
>
> I love the way these people very cleverly guess it is you, especially when
> you sign it


DUH

O' Feel Up, you are a true helpless hare - brain, a a crate - brained cretin
of the *very* commonest sort...a nattering naught - knowing ninny...a pea
soup - fogged pea BRAIN...a befuddle brainless BOOBIE...

;-P

And Steve up there is LYING...his lying noze has grown soooooooo long that
it's on the verge of passing Pluto and so leaving our solar system, in no
time at all it will reach Alpha Centauri and some of the idiotic aliens
there on "Planet Ophelia' will no doubt fall for his sockpuppoon - ish
gibberish, too...


--
Best
Greg

" I find Greg Morrow lowbrow, witless, and obnoxious. For him to claim that
we are some
kind of comedy team turns my stomach."
- "cybercat" to me on rec.food.cooking

Ophelia > wrote:

> I love the way these people very cleverly guess it is you, especially when
> you sign it

These people using "-sw" really are known-posters other than me
(even TFM sometimes uses "-sw". We just to that to confuse Jerry
since he's obsessed with me and accuses everyone of being me in
disguise.

Apparently Gregory and Barbara (sf) aren't any smarter than our
Jerry Sauk (take a bow, you two). I thought Jerry set the bar, but
records are meant to be broken.

-sw

Jerry Sauk > wrote:

> And what exactly is textured vegetable protein.

It's the secret ingredient that makes you addicted to fast food.

-sw

Geoff Miller > wrote:

> Reminds me of a tiwn I passed through once. The place was
> so small, the "entering" and "leaving" signs were mounted
> on the same pole.

Which makes perfect sense for a town, city, or state of any size.

Think about it.

-sw

Jerry Sauk > wrote:

> The POINT was, is that he was wasting bandwidth. It all adds up.

This, coming from the largest waste of resources on the planet.

-sw

"Sqwertz" > wrote in message
...
> Ophelia > wrote:
>
>> I love the way these people very cleverly guess it is you, especially
>> when
>> you sign it
>
> These people using "-sw" really are known-posters other than me
> (even TFM sometimes uses "-sw". We just to that to confuse Jerry
> since he's obsessed with me and accuses everyone of being me in
> disguise.
>
> -sw

Yeah, sez you!

-sw

On Tue, 28 Oct 2008 11:28:19 -0500, Scott wrote these lies, denials,
arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions, and/or obfuscations:
> DK wrote:
>> blake murphy wrote:
>>> On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 18:01:15 -0500, Jerry Sauk wrote:
>>>> "DK" wrote...
>>>>> Jerry Sauk wrote:
>>>>>> "Sqwertz" wrote...
>>>>>>> Jerry Sauk wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Didn't you read the Warning's?
>>>>>>> You mena the one that said From: Jerry Sauk
>>>>>>> >
>>>> ??
>>>>>>>>> Can I write 400 words?
>>>>>>>> No. I don't have time for that.
>>>>>>> So, what if - by some act of Satan - would you do if *two* people
>>>> mailed
>>>>>>> you their 200-word apologies? That would be 400 words.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -sw
>>>>>> I have plenty of time for that, if it's from two different people.
>>>> THAT'S
>>>>>> why I made the 200-word limit in the first place.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I see your still just as big of an idiot as you were before.
>>>>>
>>>>> So that's a *maximum* of 200 words? Limit *would* mean maximum so...
>>>>>
>>>>> I apologize for posting that Jerry was dead.
>>>>
>>>> It's MINUMUM 200 words, Dan. And a 200-word limit also.
>>>
>>> gosh, 199 or 201 words and i go in the killfile? jeez, i don't know if
>>> my newsreader software has a word-count function.
>>
>> Jerry can't count. No worries.
>
> Jerry does have some special skills, he can list every ingredient that
> Taco Bell uses. I don't know of anyone who's capable of doing that.

You lie. You don't know anyone who *wants* to do that -- and continue
eating there.

;-{P}

--
__________________________________________________ ______________________
Hail Eris! mhm 29x21; TM#5; Anonymous Psycho Criminal #18
TEH USENETS BULLIE
http://www.runescape.com/
Join my RuneScape clan!
http://z11.invisionfree.com/Holy_Pre...abal/index.php
Full name of clan: Cabal of the Holy International Discordian Internet
And Usenet Terrorist Pretzel

Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle
Trainer of PorchMonkey4Life
http://www.screedbomb.info/porchie/

Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, June 2008
Hammer of Thor, July 2008

"But the other thing about her, she does know about international
relations because she is right up there in Alaska right next door to
Russia." -- Steve Doocy of FOX News was obviously a football player in
his early adulthood.

Hey, Aggie! Does this sound familiar?
Message-ID: >

"Marcella proves once again that she's an ignorant racist bigot." -- OK,
what race are Greeks, again? Aggie's so much more knowledgeable than I
about that sort of thing. Message-ID:
>

"It could be several." -- Aggie answers marc_CH's question about which
drugs Jamaican athletes such as Powell and Bolt have been taking.
Message-ID: >

"Only athletes on drugs win meddles. [...]

"And the funny thing is the Greek weightlifters were not winning meddles
even while on drugs. Clearly every single weightlifter that beat a Greek
weightlifter was taking more drugs than they were." -- Yeah, that's the
ticket, Aggie! Message-ID:
>

"Do Usenet posters on drugs not know how to spell 'medals'?" -- They
really don't, marc_CH. Message-ID:
>

"Not supporting me is equivalent to forfeiting your own rights." --
John D. Wentzky: Warrior For Your Freedumb! Message-ID:
>

"You cognatatively challenged fool!" -- According to Agamemnon, Stephen
Wilson is, apparently, highly ignorant about cognates, and so is anyone
who dares to disagree with him, in Message-ID:
>

"Is it still necrophilia if I'm conscious?" -- Owen Harper, "Dead Man
Walking", Torchwood (20/207)

Eric "Reality Check©"/"Vox"/"_ Prof. Jonez _" Ross is a racist and
homophobic liar, k00k, and paedophile, as well as a coprophage.

On Oct 28, 8:27�pm, Sqwertz > wrote:
> Ophelia > wrote:
> > I love the way these people very cleverly guess it is you, especially when
> > you sign it
>
> These people using "-sw" really are known-posters other than me
> (even TFM sometimes uses "-sw". �We just to that to confuse Jerry
> since he's obsessed with me and accuses everyone of being me in
> disguise.
>
> Apparently Gregory and Barbara (sf) aren't any smarter than our
> Jerry Sauk (take a bow, you two). �I thought Jerry set the bar, but
> records are meant to be broken.
>
> -sw

Why don't you tell the truth, Pinocchio Sauk-Sqwertz, YOU and JERRY
SAUK are one and the same! Anyone who morphs can never again be
believed... you're not credible... actually you are Edleman too, and
Joel Erlich, etal.

On Tue, 28 Oct 2008 19:29:01 -0500, Sqwertz wrote:

> Jerry Sauk > wrote:
>
>> And what exactly is textured vegetable protein.
>
> It's the secret ingredient that makes you addicted to fast food.
>
> -sw

i thought the secret ingredient was just fat.

your pal,
blake

Sheldon wrote:

On Oct 28, 8:27?pm, Sqwertz > wrote:
> Ophelia > wrote:
> > I love the way these people very cleverly guess it is you, especially
when
> > you sign it
>
> These people using "-sw" really are known-posters other than me
> (even TFM sometimes uses "-sw". ?We just to that to confuse Jerry
> since he's obsessed with me and accuses everyone of being me in
> disguise.
>
> Apparently Gregory and Barbara (sf) aren't any smarter than our
> Jerry Sauk (take a bow, you two). ?I thought Jerry set the bar, but
> records are meant to be broken.
>
> -sw

Why don't you tell the truth, Pinocchio Sauk-Sqwertz, YOU and JERRY
SAUK are one and the same! Anyone who morphs can never again be
believed... you're not credible... actually you are Edleman too, and
Joel Erlich, etal.
-----------

GM:

Yup...you are *spot - on*...Steve is also the "DK" who continually torments
Jill and also "Paco" who likes to slam the cyberwretch (of course who
*doesn't*, lol).

I think Steve is suffering from some wierd sort of psycho - sexual
malady...someday it will be totally diagnosed and classified and it will be
known as "Chronic Sqwertz Onanism Complex". A pity Masters & Johnson still
aren't around, they'd have a field day with Steve...

And I'll reiterate: O' Feel Up is the DUMBEST broad to have *ever* posted
here, a Scotch Egg or a serving of haggis has far superiour intelligence to
she...egads...!!!

Lol...


--
Best
Greg

" I find Greg Morrow lowbrow, witless, and obnoxious. For him to claim that
we are some
kind of comedy team turns my stomach."
- "cybercat" to me on rec.food.cooking

"sf" > wrote in message
...
> On Sun, 26 Oct 2008 16:46:47 GMT, blake murphy
> > wrote:
>
> >gosh, 199 or 201 words and i go in the killfile? jeez, i don't know if
my
> >newsreader software has a word-count function.
>
> LOL! Compose it in your word processor and paste it into your news
> reader (check the word count there). Sheesh, do I have to tell you
> everything? The real question is "Who's will compose an apology"?
>
>
> --
> I never worry about diets. The only carrots that
> interest me are the number of carats in a diamond.
>
> Mae West

Well a large number of people want out of the kill-file, but none of them
wants to admit responsibility for what they did.

"spooge" > wrote in message
...
> "Jerry Sauk" > wrote in
> news >
> >
> > "Snarky" > wrote in message
> > news > > tp.hc nb.ggghd.bcb.cem.fi...
> >> On Sun, 26 Oct 2008 16:50:51 +0000, blake murphy wrote these lies,
> >> denials, arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions, and/or
> >> obfuscations:
> >>
> >> > On Sun, 26 Oct 2008 07:49:39 GMT, Snarky wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 15:09:43 +0000, blake murphy wrote these lies,
> >> >> denials, arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions, and/or
> >> >> obfuscations:
> >> >>> On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 12:45:48 GMT, Snarky wrote:
> >> >>>> On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 19:12:13 -0400, DK wrote these lies,
> >> >>>> denials, arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions, and/or
> >> >>>> obfuscations:
> >> >>>>> Jerry Sauk wrote:
> >> >>>>>> "Sqwertz" wrote...
> >> >>>>>>> Jerry Sauk wrote:
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> Didn't you read the Warning's?
> >> >>>>>>> You mena the one that said From: Jerry Sauk
> >> >>>>>>> > ??
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>> Can I write 400 words?
> >> >>>>>>>> No. I don't have time for that.
> >> >>>>>>> So, what if - by some act of Satan - would you do if *two*
> >> >>>>>>> people mailed you their 200-word apologies? That would be
> >> >>>>>>> 400 words.
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> -sw
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> I have plenty of time for that, if it's from two different
> >> >>>>>> people. THAT'S why I made the 200-word limit in the first
> >> >>>>>> place.
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> I see your still just as big of an idiot as you were before.
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> So that's a *maximum* of 200 words? Limit *would* mean maximum
> > so...
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> I apologize for posting that Jerry was dead.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> So, is Jerry a flesh-eating ghoul, a regular zombie, or a
> >> >>>> vampire?
> >> >>>
> >> >>> i thought he didn't eat anything not served at taco bell or
> >> >>> burger king.
> >> >>
> >> >> So that'd be "flesh-eating ghoul", then.
> >> >
> >> > i thought taco bell was big on textured vegetable protein.
> >>
> >> Burger King, however...not so much.
> >
> > And what exactly is textured vegetable protein.
>
> You call it your brain.
>
>
> --
> Black Metal ist Krieg

And how exactly is that a constructive post. Or is that your way of
admitting your embarrasment that you don't know the asnwer.

"Geoff Miller" > wrote in message
news
>
>
> Jerry Sauk > writes:
>
> > Asking and demanding are the same thing Geoff, except
> > one is a little stronger asking.
>
> When you "ask" someone for something, you express your
> preference while leaving their compliance up to their
> discretion.
>
> When you *demand* something of someone, though, you don't
> leave them the option of saying "no." You're essentially
> telling them that they have no choice.
>
>
> > But just to avoid getting dragged into another argument
> > with you, I'll change it to "I strongly ask" netequette
> > to be followed.
>
> I knew I could count on you to see reason, Jerry.
>
>
>
> Geoff

Which exactly the same thing I just said, just in your own words. Their
both asking, but one is stronger then th eother.

"Geoff Miller" > wrote in message
et...
>
>
> Jerry Sauk > writes:
>
> : How 1990. What next, flaming people for "wasting bandwidth"
> : because they have .signatures that are longer than the
> : regulation four lines?
>
> > Oh I see, yet people can flame me for not trimming post's.
>
>
> The crucial difference, Jerry, is that I don't flame you for
> not trimming posts *on the basis that you're wasting bandwidth.*
> I do it on the basis that you force readers to scroll down past
> material that they've already read at least once before.

Are you trying to tell me your life is so important that you don't have
time to scroll down??? Maybe *I* dont have time to do the trimming!!!

"blake murphy" > wrote in message
...
> On Mon, 27 Oct 2008 17:12:55 -0400, TFM® wrote:
>
> > "Jerry Sauk" > wrote in message
> > news
> >>
> >> "Geoff Miller" > wrote in message
> >> et...
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Jerry Sauk > writes:
> >>>
> >>> > Anybody who knows anything about usenet steve is that
> >>> > it's FOAD. by typing out all the words you waste
> >>> > bandwidth.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> How 1990. What next, flaming people for "wasting bandwidth"
> >>> because they have .signatures that are longer than the
> >>> regulation four lines?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Geoff
> >>
> >> Oh I see, yet people can flame me for not trimming post's.
> >>
> >>
> >
> > Yes, because not trimming is retarded behavior. There is no concern for
> > bandwidth anymore. This is the age of high speed.
> > I download several movies nightly while I'm poking you with bandwidth
> > wasting sentences that you can barely comprehend.
> >
> > If you had a real job and your own place you could have high speed
access
> > too.
> >
> > As it is, you're stuck in the basement on dialup for life. Good thing
> > that's not too long.
> >
> >
> > TFM®
>
> but jerry says fast food is healthy! him and his 300 pounds might live
> forever!
>
> your pal,
> blake

Subway food is extremely healthy, I lost lot's of weight eating there.

And besides medical research has proved that eating fast-food is healthy
too, as long as you watch the calorie's which is what coauses weight-gain.