On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 14:47:35 -0600, Jerry Sauk wrote these lies, denials,
arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions, and/or obfuscations:
> "spooge" wrote...
>> "Jerry Sauk" wrote:
>> > "Snarky" wrote...
>> >> On Sun, 26 Oct 2008 16:50:51 +0000, blake murphy wrote these lies,
>> >> denials, arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions, and/or
>> >> obfuscations:
>> >> > On Sun, 26 Oct 2008 07:49:39 GMT, Snarky wrote:
>> >> >> On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 15:09:43 +0000, blake murphy wrote these lies,
>> >> >> denials, arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions, and/or
>> >> >> obfuscations:
>> >> >>> On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 12:45:48 GMT, Snarky wrote:
>> >> >>>> On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 19:12:13 -0400, DK wrote these lies,
>> >> >>>> denials, arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions, and/or
>> >> >>>> obfuscations:
>> >> >>>>> Jerry Sauk wrote:
>> >> >>>>>> "Sqwertz" wrote...
>> >> >>>>>>> Jerry Sauk wrote:
>> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>> Didn't you read the Warning's?
>> >> >>>>>>> You mena the one that said From: Jerry Sauk
>> >> >>>>>>> > ??
>> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>> Can I write 400 words?
>> >> >>>>>>>> No. I don't have time for that.
>> >> >>>>>>> So, what if - by some act of Satan - would you do if *two*
>> >> >>>>>>> people mailed you their 200-word apologies? That would be
>> >> >>>>>>> 400 words.
>> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>> -sw
>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>> I have plenty of time for that, if it's from two different
>> >> >>>>>> people. THAT'S why I made the 200-word limit in the first
>> >> >>>>>> place.
>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>> I see your still just as big of an idiot as you were before.
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>> So that's a *maximum* of 200 words? Limit *would* mean maximum
>> > so...
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>> I apologize for posting that Jerry was dead.
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> So, is Jerry a flesh-eating ghoul, a regular zombie, or a
>> >> >>>> vampire?
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> i thought he didn't eat anything not served at taco bell or
>> >> >>> burger king.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> So that'd be "flesh-eating ghoul", then.
>> >> >
>> >> > i thought taco bell was big on textured vegetable protein.
>> >>
>> >> Burger King, however...not so much.
>> >
>> > And what exactly is textured vegetable protein.
>>
>> You call it your brain.
>
> And how exactly is that a constructive post. Or is that your way of
> admitting your embarrasment that you don't know the asnwer.

<points and laffs at teh kl00less l00n> "Constructive post." Hee hee.

--
__________________________________________________ ______________________
Hail Eris! mhm 29x21; TM#5; Anonymous Psycho Criminal #18
TEH USENETS BULLIE
http://www.runescape.com/
Join my RuneScape clan!
http://z11.invisionfree.com/Holy_Pre...abal/index.php
Full name of clan: Cabal of the Holy International Discordian Internet
And Usenet Terrorist Pretzel

Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle
Trainer of PorchMonkey4Life
http://www.screedbomb.info/porchie/

Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, June 2008
Hammer of Thor, July 2008

"But the other thing about her, she does know about international
relations because she is right up there in Alaska right next door to
Russia." -- Steve Doocy of FOX News was obviously a football player in
his early adulthood.

Hey, Aggie! Does this sound familiar?
Message-ID: >

"Marcella proves once again that she's an ignorant racist bigot." -- OK,
what race are Greeks, again? Aggie's so much more knowledgeable than I
about that sort of thing. Message-ID:
>

"It could be several." -- Aggie answers marc_CH's question about which
drugs Jamaican athletes such as Powell and Bolt have been taking.
Message-ID: >

"Only athletes on drugs win meddles. [...]

"And the funny thing is the Greek weightlifters were not winning meddles
even while on drugs. Clearly every single weightlifter that beat a Greek
weightlifter was taking more drugs than they were." -- Yeah, that's the
ticket, Aggie! Message-ID:
>

"Do Usenet posters on drugs not know how to spell 'medals'?" -- They
really don't, marc_CH. Message-ID:
>

"Not supporting me is equivalent to forfeiting your own rights." --
John D. Wentzky: Warrior For Your Freedumb! Message-ID:
>

"You cognatatively challenged fool!" -- According to Agamemnon, Stephen
Wilson is, apparently, highly ignorant about cognates, and so is anyone
who dares to disagree with him, in Message-ID:
>

"Is it still necrophilia if I'm conscious?" -- Owen Harper, "Dead Man
Walking", Torchwood (20/207)

Eric "Reality Check©"/"Vox"/"_ Prof. Jonez _" Ross is a racist and
homophobic liar, k00k, and paedophile, as well as a coprophage.

On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 17:42:35 -0600, Jerry Sauk wrote these lies, denials,
arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions, and/or obfuscations:
> "Snarky" wrote...
>> On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 14:47:35 -0600, Jerry Sauk wrote these lies,
>> denials, arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions, and/or
>> obfuscations:
>> > "spooge" wrote...
>> >> "Jerry Sauk" wrote:
>> >> > "Snarky" wrote...
>> >> >> On Sun, 26 Oct 2008 16:50:51 +0000, blake murphy wrote these lies,
>> >> >> denials, arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions, and/or
>> >> >> obfuscations:
>> >> >> > On Sun, 26 Oct 2008 07:49:39 GMT, Snarky wrote:
>> >> >> >> On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 15:09:43 +0000, blake murphy wrote these
> lies,
>> >> >> >> denials, arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions, and/or
>> >> >> >> obfuscations:
>> >> >> >>> On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 12:45:48 GMT, Snarky wrote:
>> >> >> >>>> On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 19:12:13 -0400, DK wrote these lies,
>> >> >> >>>> denials, arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions,
>> >> >> >>>> and/or obfuscations:
>> >> >> >>>>> Jerry Sauk wrote:
>> >> >> >>>>>> "Sqwertz" wrote...
>> >> >> >>>>>>> Jerry Sauk wrote:
>> >> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>> Didn't you read the Warning's?
>> >> >> >>>>>>> You mena the one that said From: Jerry Sauk
>> >> >> >>>>>>> > ??
>> >> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Can I write 400 words?
>> >> >> >>>>>>>> No. I don't have time for that.
>> >> >> >>>>>>> So, what if - by some act of Satan - would you do if *two*
>> >> >> >>>>>>> people mailed you their 200-word apologies? That would be
>> >> >> >>>>>>> 400 words.
>> >> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>> -sw
>> >> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>> I have plenty of time for that, if it's from two different
>> >> >> >>>>>> people. THAT'S why I made the 200-word limit in the first
>> >> >> >>>>>> place.
>> >> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>> I see your still just as big of an idiot as you were
>> >> >> >>>>>> before.
>> >> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>> So that's a *maximum* of 200 words? Limit *would* mean
> maximum
>> >> > so...
>> >> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>> I apologize for posting that Jerry was dead.
>> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >>>> So, is Jerry a flesh-eating ghoul, a regular zombie, or a
>> >> >> >>>> vampire?
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> i thought he didn't eat anything not served at taco bell or
>> >> >> >>> burger king.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> So that'd be "flesh-eating ghoul", then.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > i thought taco bell was big on textured vegetable protein.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Burger King, however...not so much.
>> >> >
>> >> > And what exactly is textured vegetable protein.
>> >>
>> >> You call it your brain.
>> >
>> > And how exactly is that a constructive post. Or is that your way of
>> > admitting your embarrasment that you don't know the asnwer.
>>
>> <points and laffs at teh kl00less l00n> "Constructive post." Hee hee.
>
> THE QUESTION WAS HOW IS THAT A CONSTRUCTIVE POST, NOT IS IT ONE.

This is usenet. Why are you looking for "constructive" posts here? Look
for *entertaining*, you'll have much better luck.

--
__________________________________________________ ______________________
Hail Eris! mhm 29x21; TM#5; Anonymous Psycho Criminal #18
TEH USENETS BULLIE
http://www.runescape.com/
Join my RuneScape clan!
http://z11.invisionfree.com/Holy_Pre...abal/index.php
Full name of clan: Cabal of the Holy International Discordian Internet
And Usenet Terrorist Pretzel

Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle
Trainer of PorchMonkey4Life
http://www.screedbomb.info/porchie/

Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, June 2008
Hammer of Thor, July 2008

"But the other thing about her, she does know about international
relations because she is right up there in Alaska right next door to
Russia." -- Steve Doocy of FOX News was obviously a football player in
his early adulthood.

Hey, Aggie! Does this sound familiar?
Message-ID: >

"Marcella proves once again that she's an ignorant racist bigot." -- OK,
what race are Greeks, again? Aggie's so much more knowledgeable than I
about that sort of thing. Message-ID:
>

"It could be several." -- Aggie answers marc_CH's question about which
drugs Jamaican athletes such as Powell and Bolt have been taking.
Message-ID: >

"Only athletes on drugs win meddles. [...]

"And the funny thing is the Greek weightlifters were not winning meddles
even while on drugs. Clearly every single weightlifter that beat a Greek
weightlifter was taking more drugs than they were." -- Yeah, that's the
ticket, Aggie! Message-ID:
>

"Do Usenet posters on drugs not know how to spell 'medals'?" -- They
really don't, marc_CH. Message-ID:
>

"Not supporting me is equivalent to forfeiting your own rights." --
John D. Wentzky: Warrior For Your Freedumb! Message-ID:
>

"You cognatatively challenged fool!" -- According to Agamemnon, Stephen
Wilson is, apparently, highly ignorant about cognates, and so is anyone
who dares to disagree with him, in Message-ID:
>

"Is it still necrophilia if I'm conscious?" -- Owen Harper, "Dead Man
Walking", Torchwood (20/207)

Eric "Reality Check©"/"Vox"/"_ Prof. Jonez _" Ross is a racist and
homophobic liar, k00k, and paedophile, as well as a coprophage.

"Snarky" > wrote in message
news nb.ggghd.bcb.cem.fi...
> On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 14:47:35 -0600, Jerry Sauk wrote these lies, denials,
> arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions, and/or obfuscations:
> > "spooge" wrote...
> >> "Jerry Sauk" wrote:
> >> > "Snarky" wrote...
> >> >> On Sun, 26 Oct 2008 16:50:51 +0000, blake murphy wrote these lies,
> >> >> denials, arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions, and/or
> >> >> obfuscations:
> >> >> > On Sun, 26 Oct 2008 07:49:39 GMT, Snarky wrote:
> >> >> >> On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 15:09:43 +0000, blake murphy wrote these
lies,
> >> >> >> denials, arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions, and/or
> >> >> >> obfuscations:
> >> >> >>> On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 12:45:48 GMT, Snarky wrote:
> >> >> >>>> On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 19:12:13 -0400, DK wrote these lies,
> >> >> >>>> denials, arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions, and/or
> >> >> >>>> obfuscations:
> >> >> >>>>> Jerry Sauk wrote:
> >> >> >>>>>> "Sqwertz" wrote...
> >> >> >>>>>>> Jerry Sauk wrote:
> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>> Didn't you read the Warning's?
> >> >> >>>>>>> You mena the one that said From: Jerry Sauk
> >> >> >>>>>>> > ??
> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Can I write 400 words?
> >> >> >>>>>>>> No. I don't have time for that.
> >> >> >>>>>>> So, what if - by some act of Satan - would you do if *two*
> >> >> >>>>>>> people mailed you their 200-word apologies? That would be
> >> >> >>>>>>> 400 words.
> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>> -sw
> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>> I have plenty of time for that, if it's from two different
> >> >> >>>>>> people. THAT'S why I made the 200-word limit in the first
> >> >> >>>>>> place.
> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>> I see your still just as big of an idiot as you were before.
> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >>>>> So that's a *maximum* of 200 words? Limit *would* mean
maximum
> >> > so...
> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >>>>> I apologize for posting that Jerry was dead.
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>> So, is Jerry a flesh-eating ghoul, a regular zombie, or a
> >> >> >>>> vampire?
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> i thought he didn't eat anything not served at taco bell or
> >> >> >>> burger king.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> So that'd be "flesh-eating ghoul", then.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > i thought taco bell was big on textured vegetable protein.
> >> >>
> >> >> Burger King, however...not so much.
> >> >
> >> > And what exactly is textured vegetable protein.
> >>
> >> You call it your brain.
> >
> > And how exactly is that a constructive post. Or is that your way of
> > admitting your embarrasment that you don't know the asnwer.
>
> <points and laffs at teh kl00less l00n> "Constructive post." Hee hee.


THE QUESTION WAS HOW IS THAT A CONSTRUCTIVE POST, NOT IS IT ONE.

Jerry Sauk wrote:
> "Geoff Miller" > wrote in message
> news
>>
>> Jerry Sauk > writes:
>>
>>> Asking and demanding are the same thing Geoff, except
>>> one is a little stronger asking.
>> When you "ask" someone for something, you express your
>> preference while leaving their compliance up to their
>> discretion.
>>
>> When you *demand* something of someone, though, you don't
>> leave them the option of saying "no." You're essentially
>> telling them that they have no choice.
>>
>>
>>> But just to avoid getting dragged into another argument
>>> with you, I'll change it to "I strongly ask" netequette
>>> to be followed.
>> I knew I could count on you to see reason, Jerry.
>>
>>
>>
>> Geoff
>
> Which exactly the same thing I just said, just in your own words. Their
> both asking, but one is stronger then th eother.
>
>

Read what he typed...again.

-sw

Snarky wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 17:42:35 -0600, Jerry Sauk wrote these lies, denials,
> arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions, and/or obfuscations:
>> "Snarky" wrote...
>>> On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 14:47:35 -0600, Jerry Sauk wrote these lies,
>>> denials, arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions, and/or
>>> obfuscations:
>>> > "spooge" wrote...
>>> >> "Jerry Sauk" wrote:
>>> >> > "Snarky" wrote...
>>> >> >> On Sun, 26 Oct 2008 16:50:51 +0000, blake murphy wrote these lies,
>>> >> >> denials, arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions, and/or
>>> >> >> obfuscations:
>>> >> >> > On Sun, 26 Oct 2008 07:49:39 GMT, Snarky wrote:
>>> >> >> >> On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 15:09:43 +0000, blake murphy wrote these
>> lies,
>>> >> >> >> denials, arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions, and/or
>>> >> >> >> obfuscations:
>>> >> >> >>> On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 12:45:48 GMT, Snarky wrote:
>>> >> >> >>>> On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 19:12:13 -0400, DK wrote these lies,
>>> >> >> >>>> denials, arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions,
>>> >> >> >>>> and/or obfuscations:
>>> >> >> >>>>> Jerry Sauk wrote:
>>> >> >> >>>>>> "Sqwertz" wrote...
>>> >> >> >>>>>>> Jerry Sauk wrote:
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>> Didn't you read the Warning's?
>>> >> >> >>>>>>> You mena the one that said From: Jerry Sauk
>>> >> >> >>>>>>> > ??
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Can I write 400 words?
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>> No. I don't have time for that.
>>> >> >> >>>>>>> So, what if - by some act of Satan - would you do if *two*
>>> >> >> >>>>>>> people mailed you their 200-word apologies? That would be
>>> >> >> >>>>>>> 400 words.
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>
>>> >> >> >>>>>>> -sw
>>> >> >> >>>>>>
>>> >> >> >>>>>> I have plenty of time for that, if it's from two different
>>> >> >> >>>>>> people. THAT'S why I made the 200-word limit in the first
>>> >> >> >>>>>> place.
>>> >> >> >>>>>>
>>> >> >> >>>>>> I see your still just as big of an idiot as you were
>>> >> >> >>>>>> before.
>>> >> >> >>>>>
>>> >> >> >>>>> So that's a *maximum* of 200 words? Limit *would* mean
>> maximum
>>> >> > so...
>>> >> >> >>>>>
>>> >> >> >>>>> I apologize for posting that Jerry was dead.
>>> >> >> >>>>
>>> >> >> >>>> So, is Jerry a flesh-eating ghoul, a regular zombie, or a
>>> >> >> >>>> vampire?
>>> >> >> >>>
>>> >> >> >>> i thought he didn't eat anything not served at taco bell or
>>> >> >> >>> burger king.
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >> So that'd be "flesh-eating ghoul", then.
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> > i thought taco bell was big on textured vegetable protein.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> Burger King, however...not so much.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > And what exactly is textured vegetable protein.
>>> >>
>>> >> You call it your brain.
>>> >
>>> > And how exactly is that a constructive post. Or is that your way of
>>> > admitting your embarrasment that you don't know the asnwer.
>>>
>>> <points and laffs at teh kl00less l00n> "Constructive post." Hee hee.
>>
>> THE QUESTION WAS HOW IS THAT A CONSTRUCTIVE POST, NOT IS IT ONE.
>
> This is usenet. Why are you looking for "constructive" posts here? Look
> for *entertaining*, you'll have much better luck.

http://www.nasa.gov/mov/285943main_R...mage%205.7.mov
--
ah

"Jerry Sauk" > wrote in
m:

>
> "spooge" > wrote in message
> ...
>> "Jerry Sauk" > wrote in
>> news >>
>> >
>> > "Snarky" > wrote in message
>> > news >> > iau tp.hc nb.ggghd.bcb.cem.fi...
>> >> On Sun, 26 Oct 2008 16:50:51 +0000, blake murphy wrote these lies,
>> >> denials, arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions, and/or
>> >> obfuscations:
>> >>
>> >> > On Sun, 26 Oct 2008 07:49:39 GMT, Snarky wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 15:09:43 +0000, blake murphy wrote these
>> >> >> lies, denials, arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions,
>> >> >> and/or obfuscations:
>> >> >>> On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 12:45:48 GMT, Snarky wrote:
>> >> >>>> On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 19:12:13 -0400, DK wrote these lies,
>> >> >>>> denials, arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions,
>> >> >>>> and/or obfuscations:
>> >> >>>>> Jerry Sauk wrote:
>> >> >>>>>> "Sqwertz" wrote...
>> >> >>>>>>> Jerry Sauk wrote:
>> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>> Didn't you read the Warning's?
>> >> >>>>>>> You mena the one that said From: Jerry Sauk
>> >> >>>>>>> > ??
>> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>> Can I write 400 words?
>> >> >>>>>>>> No. I don't have time for that.
>> >> >>>>>>> So, what if - by some act of Satan - would you do if *two*
>> >> >>>>>>> people mailed you their 200-word apologies? That would be
>> >> >>>>>>> 400 words.
>> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>> -sw
>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>> I have plenty of time for that, if it's from two different
>> >> >>>>>> people. THAT'S why I made the 200-word limit in the first
>> >> >>>>>> place.
>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>> I see your still just as big of an idiot as you were
>> >> >>>>>> before.
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>> So that's a *maximum* of 200 words? Limit *would* mean
>> >> >>>>> maximum
>> > so...
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>> I apologize for posting that Jerry was dead.
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> So, is Jerry a flesh-eating ghoul, a regular zombie, or a
>> >> >>>> vampire?
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> i thought he didn't eat anything not served at taco bell or
>> >> >>> burger king.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> So that'd be "flesh-eating ghoul", then.
>> >> >
>> >> > i thought taco bell was big on textured vegetable protein.
>> >>
>> >> Burger King, however...not so much.
>> >
>> > And what exactly is textured vegetable protein.
>>
>> You call it your brain.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Black Metal ist Krieg
>
> And how exactly is that a constructive post.

Dear Jerry, it is a constructive post in that it provides, in clear,
concise and precise language, the correct answer to your question.

> Or is that your way of admitting your embarrasment that you don't know
> the asnwer.

On the contrary, dear Jerry, my response proved that I do indeed know the
correct answer. And to top it off, being the very nice Usenet entity that
I am, I shared that answer with you and I refrained from pointing out to
that had you not been recently dead, you might have known the answer
yourself.

Is there anything else I can clarify for you at this time, Jerry?


--
Black Metal ist Krieg

"Snarky" > wrote in message
news
> On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 17:42:35 -0600, Jerry Sauk wrote these lies, denials,
> arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions, and/or obfuscations:
>> "Snarky" wrote...
>>> On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 14:47:35 -0600, Jerry Sauk wrote these lies,
>>> denials, arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions, and/or
>>> obfuscations:
>>> > "spooge" wrote...
>>> >> "Jerry Sauk" wrote:
>>> >> > "Snarky" wrote...
>>> >> >> On Sun, 26 Oct 2008 16:50:51 +0000, blake murphy wrote these lies,
>>> >> >> denials, arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions, and/or
>>> >> >> obfuscations:
>>> >> >> > On Sun, 26 Oct 2008 07:49:39 GMT, Snarky wrote:
>>> >> >> >> On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 15:09:43 +0000, blake murphy wrote these
>> lies,
>>> >> >> >> denials, arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions, and/or
>>> >> >> >> obfuscations:
>>> >> >> >>> On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 12:45:48 GMT, Snarky wrote:
>>> >> >> >>>> On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 19:12:13 -0400, DK wrote these lies,
>>> >> >> >>>> denials, arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions,
>>> >> >> >>>> and/or obfuscations:
>>> >> >> >>>>> Jerry Sauk wrote:
>>> >> >> >>>>>> "Sqwertz" wrote...
>>> >> >> >>>>>>> Jerry Sauk wrote:
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>> Didn't you read the Warning's?
>>> >> >> >>>>>>> You mena the one that said From: Jerry Sauk
>>> >> >> >>>>>>> > ??
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Can I write 400 words?
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>> No. I don't have time for that.
>>> >> >> >>>>>>> So, what if - by some act of Satan - would you do if *two*
>>> >> >> >>>>>>> people mailed you their 200-word apologies? That would be
>>> >> >> >>>>>>> 400 words.
>>> >> >> >>>>>>>
>>> >> >> >>>>>>> -sw
>>> >> >> >>>>>>
>>> >> >> >>>>>> I have plenty of time for that, if it's from two different
>>> >> >> >>>>>> people. THAT'S why I made the 200-word limit in the first
>>> >> >> >>>>>> place.
>>> >> >> >>>>>>
>>> >> >> >>>>>> I see your still just as big of an idiot as you were
>>> >> >> >>>>>> before.
>>> >> >> >>>>>
>>> >> >> >>>>> So that's a *maximum* of 200 words? Limit *would* mean
>> maximum
>>> >> > so...
>>> >> >> >>>>>
>>> >> >> >>>>> I apologize for posting that Jerry was dead.
>>> >> >> >>>>
>>> >> >> >>>> So, is Jerry a flesh-eating ghoul, a regular zombie, or a
>>> >> >> >>>> vampire?
>>> >> >> >>>
>>> >> >> >>> i thought he didn't eat anything not served at taco bell or
>>> >> >> >>> burger king.
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >> So that'd be "flesh-eating ghoul", then.
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> > i thought taco bell was big on textured vegetable protein.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> Burger King, however...not so much.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > And what exactly is textured vegetable protein.
>>> >>
>>> >> You call it your brain.
>>> >
>>> > And how exactly is that a constructive post. Or is that your way of
>>> > admitting your embarrasment that you don't know the asnwer.
>>>
>>> <points and laffs at teh kl00less l00n> "Constructive post." Hee hee.
>>
>> THE QUESTION WAS HOW IS THAT A CONSTRUCTIVE POST, NOT IS IT ONE.
>
> This is usenet. Why are you looking for "constructive" posts here? Look
> for *entertaining*, you'll have much better luck.


It doesn't understand entertainment. It thinks it is the overlord of teh
usenet.

Souce®

"ah" > wrote

>> This is usenet. Why are you looking for "constructive" posts here? Look
>> for *entertaining*, you'll have much better luck.
>
> http://www.nasa.gov/mov/285943main_R...mage%205.7.mov


Is that wisconsin? I knew there was no intelligent life there.

Souce®

Sqwertz > writes:

: Reminds me of a town I passed through once. The place was
: so small, the "entering" and "leaving" signs were mounted
: on the same pole.

> Which makes perfect sense for a town, city, or state of any
> size.

> Think about it.


I did -- overnight, in fact. And I still don't get it.



Geoff

--
"My theory about the American public's initial burst of enthusiasm
for the vice-presidential candidate hinged on the fact that she looks
like a porn star in some scenario involving a library, the unclasping
of hair and the removal of glasses." -- India Knight

"John "C"" > wrote in message
et...
>
> "TFM®" > wrote in message
> . com...
>>
>>
>> "ah" > wrote
>>
>> >> This is usenet. Why are you looking for "constructive" posts here?
> Look
>> >> for *entertaining*, you'll have much better luck.
>> >
>> > http://www.nasa.gov/mov/285943main_R...mage%205.7.mov
>>
>>
>> Is that wisconsin? I knew there was no intelligent life there.
>>
>
> No it's Uranus:
>
> http://www.charonboat.com/2008/10/ch...com_goatse.jpg
>
> HJ
>

There is no intelligent life on my anus either.

Souce®

"TFM®" > wrote in message
. com...
>
>
> "ah" > wrote
>
> >> This is usenet. Why are you looking for "constructive" posts here?
Look
> >> for *entertaining*, you'll have much better luck.
> >
> > http://www.nasa.gov/mov/285943main_R...mage%205.7.mov
>
>
> Is that wisconsin? I knew there was no intelligent life there.
>

No it's Uranus:

http://www.charonboat.com/2008/10/ch...com_goatse.jpg

HJ

Sheldon > wrote:

> Why don't you tell the truth, Pinocchio Sauk-Sqwertz, YOU and JERRY
> SAUK are one and the same! Anyone who morphs can never again be
> believed... you're not credible... actually you are Edleman too, and
> Joel Erlich, etal.

Erlich. Hrmp. You must hold me in even higher regards than I
thought. Edelman I don't remember. Did they **** with you as much
as I and Postorio?

Those were better days before you brought out the worst in people.
People almost somewhat liked you back then.

As for Jerry. Well... Hrmmm. I don't know what contact he's had
with those who actually know him, but it's likely to get really
nasty - very soon if he persists in being an ass.

We need to put that to rest as well. Jerry cannot live while the
only person who knows his true identity is sick. Jerry must
disappear or morph into a respectable person. Or die.

Gee - Did that sound crass?

-sw

"Gregory Morrow" > wrote in message
m...
>
>
> Sheldon wrote:
>
> On Oct 28, 8:27?pm, Sqwertz > wrote:
>> Ophelia > wrote:
>> > I love the way these people very cleverly guess it is you, especially
> when
>> > you sign it
>>
>> These people using "-sw" really are known-posters other than me
>> (even TFM sometimes uses "-sw". ?We just to that to confuse Jerry
>> since he's obsessed with me and accuses everyone of being me in
>> disguise.
>>
>> Apparently Gregory and Barbara (sf) aren't any smarter than our
>> Jerry Sauk (take a bow, you two). ?I thought Jerry set the bar, but
>> records are meant to be broken.
>>
>> -sw
>
> Why don't you tell the truth, Pinocchio Sauk-Sqwertz, YOU and JERRY
> SAUK are one and the same! Anyone who morphs can never again be
> believed... you're not credible... actually you are Edleman too, and
> Joel Erlich, etal.
> -----------
>
> GM:
>
> Yup...you are *spot - on*...Steve is also the "DK" who continually
> torments
> Jill and also "Paco" who likes to slam the cyberwretch (of course who
> *doesn't*, lol).
>
>
>
> --
> Best
> Greg

Sorry Greg, but I'm not Steve. Or Steve isn't me. Not quite sure how that
works. I started signing -sw in a.f.f-f to mess with Jerry. It just flowed
over to here when some started accusing me of being him. Or he being me.
Or whatever. I can't vouch for Jerry or DK or any other "identities", just
me. But, can anyone say they've ever seen Steve and Jerry together? As far
as the cyberslit, I think I may be done with her(?). She was amusing for a
while; now she repulses me. After reading her posts, I feel that penicillin
is in order.

-sw

"Geoff Miller" > wrote in message
et...
>
>
> Sqwertz > writes:
>
> : Reminds me of a town I passed through once. The place was
> : so small, the "entering" and "leaving" signs were mounted
> : on the same pole.
>
>> Which makes perfect sense for a town, city, or state of any
>> size.
>
>> Think about it.
>
>
> I did -- overnight, in fact. And I still don't get it.
>
>
>
> Geoff
>


"Entering" on one side, "leaving" on the other. <cue rimshot>

On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 20:23:19 -0400, TFM® wrote these lies, denials,
arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions, and/or obfuscations:
> "Snarky" wrote...
>> On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 17:42:35 -0600, Jerry Sauk wrote these lies,
>> denials, arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions, and/or
>> obfuscations:
>>> "Snarky" wrote...
>>>> On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 14:47:35 -0600, Jerry Sauk wrote these lies,
>>>> denials, arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions, and/or
>>>> obfuscations:
>>>> > "spooge" wrote...
>>>> >> "Jerry Sauk" wrote:
>>>> >> > "Snarky" wrote...
>>>> >> >> On Sun, 26 Oct 2008 16:50:51 +0000, blake murphy wrote these
>>>> >> >> lies, denials, arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions,
>>>> >> >> and/or obfuscations:
>>>> >> >> > On Sun, 26 Oct 2008 07:49:39 GMT, Snarky wrote:
>>>> >> >> >> On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 15:09:43 +0000, blake murphy wrote these
>>> lies,
>>>> >> >> >> denials, arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions,
>>>> >> >> >> and/or obfuscations:
>>>> >> >> >>> On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 12:45:48 GMT, Snarky wrote:
>>>> >> >> >>>> On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 19:12:13 -0400, DK wrote these lies,
>>>> >> >> >>>> denials, arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions,
>>>> >> >> >>>> and/or obfuscations:
>>>> >> >> >>>>> Jerry Sauk wrote:
>>>> >> >> >>>>>> "Sqwertz" wrote...
>>>> >> >> >>>>>>> Jerry Sauk wrote:
>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>
>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>> Didn't you read the Warning's?
>>>> >> >> >>>>>>> You mena the one that said From: Jerry Sauk
>>>> >> >> >>>>>>> > ??
>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>
>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Can I write 400 words?
>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>> No. I don't have time for that.
>>>> >> >> >>>>>>> So, what if - by some act of Satan - would you do if
>>>> >> >> >>>>>>> *two* people mailed you their 200-word apologies? That
>>>> >> >> >>>>>>> would be 400 words.
>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>
>>>> >> >> >>>>>>> -sw
>>>> >> >> >>>>>>
>>>> >> >> >>>>>> I have plenty of time for that, if it's from two
>>>> >> >> >>>>>> different people. THAT'S why I made the 200-word limit in
>>>> >> >> >>>>>> the first place.
>>>> >> >> >>>>>>
>>>> >> >> >>>>>> I see your still just as big of an idiot as you were
>>>> >> >> >>>>>> before.
>>>> >> >> >>>>>
>>>> >> >> >>>>> So that's a *maximum* of 200 words? Limit *would* mean
>>> maximum
>>>> >> > so...
>>>> >> >> >>>>>
>>>> >> >> >>>>> I apologize for posting that Jerry was dead.
>>>> >> >> >>>>
>>>> >> >> >>>> So, is Jerry a flesh-eating ghoul, a regular zombie, or a
>>>> >> >> >>>> vampire?
>>>> >> >> >>>
>>>> >> >> >>> i thought he didn't eat anything not served at taco bell or
>>>> >> >> >>> burger king.
>>>> >> >> >>
>>>> >> >> >> So that'd be "flesh-eating ghoul", then.
>>>> >> >> >
>>>> >> >> > i thought taco bell was big on textured vegetable protein.
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >> Burger King, however...not so much.
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > And what exactly is textured vegetable protein.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> You call it your brain.
>>>> >
>>>> > And how exactly is that a constructive post. Or is that your way of
>>>> > admitting your embarrasment that you don't know the asnwer.
>>>>
>>>> <points and laffs at teh kl00less l00n> "Constructive post." Hee hee.
>>>
>>> THE QUESTION WAS HOW IS THAT A CONSTRUCTIVE POST, NOT IS IT ONE.
>>
>> This is usenet. Why are you looking for "constructive" posts here? Look
>> for *entertaining*, you'll have much better luck.
>
> It doesn't understand entertainment. It thinks it is the overlord of teh
> usenet.

One must try to pound clues into his empty skull anyway, though.

--
__________________________________________________ ______________________
Hail Eris! mhm 29x21; TM#5; Anonymous Psycho Criminal #18
TEH USENETS BULLIE
http://www.runescape.com/
Join my RuneScape clan!
http://z11.invisionfree.com/Holy_Pre...abal/index.php
Full name of clan: Cabal of the Holy International Discordian Internet
And Usenet Terrorist Pretzel

Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle
Trainer of PorchMonkey4Life
http://www.screedbomb.info/porchie/

Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, June 2008
Hammer of Thor, July 2008

"But the other thing about her, she does know about international
relations because she is right up there in Alaska right next door to
Russia." -- Steve Doocy of FOX News was obviously a football player in
his early adulthood.

Hey, Aggie! Does this sound familiar?
Message-ID: >

"Marcella proves once again that she's an ignorant racist bigot." -- OK,
what race are Greeks, again? Aggie's so much more knowledgeable than I
about that sort of thing. Message-ID:
>

"It could be several." -- Aggie answers marc_CH's question about which
drugs Jamaican athletes such as Powell and Bolt have been taking.
Message-ID: >

"Only athletes on drugs win meddles. [...]

"And the funny thing is the Greek weightlifters were not winning meddles
even while on drugs. Clearly every single weightlifter that beat a Greek
weightlifter was taking more drugs than they were." -- Yeah, that's the
ticket, Aggie! Message-ID:
>

"Do Usenet posters on drugs not know how to spell 'medals'?" -- They
really don't, marc_CH. Message-ID:
>

"Not supporting me is equivalent to forfeiting your own rights." --
John D. Wentzky: Warrior For Your Freedumb! Message-ID:
>

"You cognatatively challenged fool!" -- According to Agamemnon, Stephen
Wilson is, apparently, highly ignorant about cognates, and so is anyone
who dares to disagree with him, in Message-ID:
>

"Is it still necrophilia if I'm conscious?" -- Owen Harper, "Dead Man
Walking", Torchwood (20/207)

Eric "Reality Check©"/"Vox"/"_ Prof. Jonez _" Ross is a racist and
homophobic liar, k00k, and paedophile, as well as a coprophage.

On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 19:47:20 -0500, Geoff Miller wrote these lies,
denials, arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions, and/or
obfuscations:
> Sqwertz writes:
>
> : Reminds me of a town I passed through once. The place was so small, the
> : "entering" and "leaving" signs were mounted on the same pole.
>
>> Which makes perfect sense for a town, city, or state of any size.
>
>> Think about it.
>
> I did -- overnight, in fact. And I still don't get it.

On opposite sides...After all, most roads in and out of town are
two-way, right?

--
__________________________________________________ ______________________
Hail Eris! mhm 29x21; TM#5; Anonymous Psycho Criminal #18
TEH USENETS BULLIE
http://www.runescape.com/
Join my RuneScape clan!
http://z11.invisionfree.com/Holy_Pre...abal/index.php
Full name of clan: Cabal of the Holy International Discordian Internet
And Usenet Terrorist Pretzel

Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle
Trainer of PorchMonkey4Life
http://www.screedbomb.info/porchie/

Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, June 2008
Hammer of Thor, July 2008

"But the other thing about her, she does know about international
relations because she is right up there in Alaska right next door to
Russia." -- Steve Doocy of FOX News was obviously a football player in
his early adulthood.

Hey, Aggie! Does this sound familiar?
Message-ID: >

"Marcella proves once again that she's an ignorant racist bigot." -- OK,
what race are Greeks, again? Aggie's so much more knowledgeable than I
about that sort of thing. Message-ID:
>

"It could be several." -- Aggie answers marc_CH's question about which
drugs Jamaican athletes such as Powell and Bolt have been taking.
Message-ID: >

"Only athletes on drugs win meddles. [...]

"And the funny thing is the Greek weightlifters were not winning meddles
even while on drugs. Clearly every single weightlifter that beat a Greek
weightlifter was taking more drugs than they were." -- Yeah, that's the
ticket, Aggie! Message-ID:
>

"Do Usenet posters on drugs not know how to spell 'medals'?" -- They
really don't, marc_CH. Message-ID:
>

"Not supporting me is equivalent to forfeiting your own rights." --
John D. Wentzky: Warrior For Your Freedumb! Message-ID:
>

"You cognatatively challenged fool!" -- According to Agamemnon, Stephen
Wilson is, apparently, highly ignorant about cognates, and so is anyone
who dares to disagree with him, in Message-ID:
>

"Is it still necrophilia if I'm conscious?" -- Owen Harper, "Dead Man
Walking", Torchwood (20/207)

Eric "Reality Check©"/"Vox"/"_ Prof. Jonez _" Ross is a racist and
homophobic liar, k00k, and paedophile, as well as a coprophage.

Paco > wrote:

> Sorry Greg, but I'm not Steve.

You don't have to explain anything to him. He's less than nothing.

-sw (Raising a taco to Paco)

Geoff Miller > wrote:

> Sqwertz > writes:
>
>: Reminds me of a town I passed through once. The place was
>: so small, the "entering" and "leaving" signs were mounted
>: on the same pole.
>
>> Which makes perfect sense for a town, city, or state of any
>> size.
>
>> Think about it.
>
> I did -- overnight, in fact. And I still don't get it.

Sorry to keep you up all night. The sign would read:

"Entering Xyzzy - Population 1,000" on one side,
"Leaving Xyzzy - Population 999" on the other side.

The sign is mounted on a single pole.

You've just been demoted to #3 smartest person on Usenet.

-sw

Sqwertz > wrote:

> Jerry Sauk > wrote:
>
>> And what exactly is textured vegetable protein.
>
> It's the secret ingredient that makes you addicted to fast food.

And salt. And mouthfeel.

This may be why Jerry sucks so much cock.

-sw

On Thu, 30 Oct 2008 15:16:24 -0600, Jerry Sauk did most oddly state:
> "Snarky" wrote...
>> On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 17:42:35 -0600, Jerry Sauk wrote these lies,
>> denials, arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions, and/or
>> obfuscations:
>> > "Snarky" wrote...
>> >> On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 14:47:35 -0600, Jerry Sauk wrote these lies,
>> >> denials, arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions, and/or
>> >> obfuscations:
>> >> > "spooge" wrote...
>> >> >> "Jerry Sauk" wrote:
>> >> >> > "Snarky" wrote...
>> >> >> >> On Sun, 26 Oct 2008 16:50:51 +0000, blake murphy wrote these
> lies,
>> >> >> >> denials, arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions, and/or
>> >> >> >> obfuscations:
>> >> >> >> > On Sun, 26 Oct 2008 07:49:39 GMT, Snarky wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 15:09:43 +0000, blake murphy wrote these
>> > lies,
>> >> >> >> >> denials, arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions,
> and/or
>> >> >> >> >> obfuscations:
>> >> >> >> >>> On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 12:45:48 GMT, Snarky wrote:
>> >> >> >> >>>> On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 19:12:13 -0400, DK wrote these lies,
>> >> >> >> >>>> denials, arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions,
>> >> >> >> >>>> and/or obfuscations:
>> >> >> >> >>>>> Jerry Sauk wrote:
>> >> >> >> >>>>>> "Sqwertz" wrote...
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>> Jerry Sauk wrote:
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> Didn't you read the Warning's?
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>> You mena the one that said From: Jerry Sauk
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>> > ??
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Can I write 400 words?
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> No. I don't have time for that.
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>> So, what if - by some act of Satan - would you do if
> *two*
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>> people mailed you their 200-word apologies? That would
> be
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>> 400 words.
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>> -sw
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>> I have plenty of time for that, if it's from two
>> >> >> >> >>>>>> different people. THAT'S why I made the 200-word limit
>> >> >> >> >>>>>> in the first place.
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>> I see your still just as big of an idiot as you were
>> >> >> >> >>>>>> before.
>> >> >> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>> So that's a *maximum* of 200 words? Limit *would* mean
>> > maximum
>> >> >> > so...
>> >> >> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>> I apologize for posting that Jerry was dead.
>> >> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>> So, is Jerry a flesh-eating ghoul, a regular zombie, or a
>> >> >> >> >>>> vampire?
>> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >> >>> i thought he didn't eat anything not served at taco bell or
>> >> >> >> >>> burger king.
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> So that'd be "flesh-eating ghoul", then.
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > i thought taco bell was big on textured vegetable protein.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Burger King, however...not so much.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > And what exactly is textured vegetable protein.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> You call it your brain.
>> >> >
>> >> > And how exactly is that a constructive post. Or is that your way
>> >> > of admitting your embarrasment that you don't know the asnwer.
>> >>
>> >> <points and laffs at teh kl00less l00n> "Constructive post." Hee hee.
>> >
>> > THE QUESTION WAS HOW IS THAT A CONSTRUCTIVE POST, NOT IS IT ONE.
>>
>> This is usenet. Why are you looking for "constructive" posts here? Look
>> for *entertaining*, you'll have much better luck.
>
> I DIDN'T SAY i WAS LOOKNIG CONSTRUCTIVE POSTS, DIPWAD!!!!!!!!!! I said
> HOW is that post constructive!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Since
> this group is all about fast-food education among other thing's!

How is your post constructive?

--
__________________________________________________ ______________________
Hail Eris! mhm 29x21; TM#5; Chung Convict #28; Usenet Ruiner #5
Demon Lord of Confusion; Official Chung Demon; Top Asshole #3
Superfaggot; Wingnut's #1 World Class Coward (next to the French)
COOSN-029-06-71069; Most Hated Usenetizen of All Time #13; Lits Slut #16
Gutter Chix0r #17; BowTie's Spuriously Accused Pedo Photographer #4
AUK Psycho & Felon #21; Parrot & Zombie #2; AUK Hate Machine Cog #19
Anonymous Psycho Criminal #18
The posting nym is best removed from my posting address if your goal is
to speak with me in private.
Supreme High Overlord of rec.radio.*
"Atheists are people who have no invisible means of support"
Join my RuneScape clan!
http://z11.invisionfree.com/Holy_Pre...abal/index.php
Full name of clan: Cabal of the Holy International Discordian Internet
And Usenet Terrorist Pretzel
A message to Tory scum: The environment is still more important than the
economy. The stock market goes up and down, and only fools think they
can control it.

"Canada is going to hades quickly with the Fag laws and the drug
problem." -- A self-professed "former kookologist" (around at the very
beginning, in fact) has an interesting definition of "quickly".
Message-ID: >

"A dog in the video I watched ****ed a human woman. The dog consented to
it and the woman consented to it. That is like one *** man consenting to
having sex with another. Do you approve of it?" -- Agamemnon watches
bestiality porn and compares it to *** sex. Message-ID:
>
http://www.kookpedia.net/index.php/Agamemnon

"I know how you special busboys are.
You're crazy." -- John "special busboy" Wentzky, in Message-ID:
>

"Roe V Wade has zero bearing on my existence other than it affects it
adversely."
-- Johnny Wentzky never had much truck with "logic". Message-ID:
>

"F!ck moderation, free speech is a masculinist proverb and that's what
feminist manvagina's like yourself." -- posted
before finishing a thought, in MID:
. com>

"Fredbot == SameAsB4 == TGOOS

"You are stalking me, even after I thrashed ya." -- PorchMonkey4Life,
a veritable combination of Sherlock Holmes and Doc Savage for the 21st
Century. No, really. Would I lie? MID: <zaUqh.2972$E35.415@trnddc02>

"He unleashes a fecal explosion he time he posts. He uses so many nyms
because he gets beaten so easily and so convincingly in flame wars and
tries to hide behind nyms in the hopes of getting a fresh start. To bad
for him that his lameness keep shining through like a beacon for all
tards (e.g., SameAs$B4, Demon Spawn, Barbara's Pus$y, FredBot,
TGOOS, ......, etc)" -- Monkey-man identifies <jitter> as me, among
others, in broken English, in MID: <Z_Xqh.3167$E35.215@trnddc02>

Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle
Trainer of the above k00k
http://www.screedbomb.info/porchie/

Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, June 2008
Hammer of Thor, July 2008

"Q: What do you call someone in the White House who is honest, caring,
and well-read?
A: A tourist." -- Anonymous

"It would be offly hard for any of you to abuse me on usenet. Really. I
have the advantage. I could easily turn alt.usenet.kooks into a cesspool
of encoded posts. Bringing the noise ratio up so high as to make the
group worthless. Anybody who can code could do this, why nobody has
bothered before now is beyond me. The ultimate spamming engine..
'BAWAHAHA'" -- Dustbin "Outer Filth" K00k's delusions of grandeur
reached new heights, in Message-ID:
>
"Immorality: The morality of those who are having a better time." -- H.
L. Mencken

"Consider that language a moment. 'Purposefully and materially
supported hostilities against the United States' is in the eye of the
beholder, and this administration has proven itself to be astonishingly
impatient with criticism of any kind. The broad powers given to Bush by
this legislation allow him to capture, indefinitely detain, and refuse a
hearing to any American citizen who speaks out against Iraq or any other
part of the so-called 'War on Terror.'

"If you write a letter to the editor attacking Bush, you could be
deemed as purposefully and materially supporting hostilities against the
United States. If you organize or join a public demonstration against
Iraq, or against the administration, the same designation could befall
you. One dark-comedy aspect of the legislation is that senators or House
members who publicly disagree with Bush, criticize him, or organize
investigations into his dealings could be placed under the same
designation. In effect, Congress just gave Bush the power to lock them
up." -- William Rivers Pitt

"It has become clear in recent months that a critical mass of the American
people have seen through the lies of the Bush administration; with the
president's polls at an historic low, growing resistance to the war Iraq,
and the Democrats likely to take back the Congress in mid-term elections,
the Bush administration is on the ropes. And so it is particularly
worrying that President Bush has seen fit, at this juncture to, in effect,
declare himself dictator." -- Frank Morales
http://www.uruknet.biz/?p=m27769&hd=0&size=1&l=e&fark

"Right you are correct. Someone hooked me. I do believe in building
relationships. That is what Christians are required to do. I am amoral.
I am sure you know what that means. So are Scorpios. I am being
'protected' by the Formosa Rule because of my 'mental illness'. I am not
targeting 'teh Mop Jockey'. You are and you are using me as a bait.
Please stop. I have my own fish to reel in. Leave me alone. It is my hope
that I will be able to catch a fish and reel it in for you. Once my
retired bishop thought I was fishing for him and he took the bait, alas
it wasn't me and that spelled the demise of our relationship. Have a
little bit more faith in me. An Eastern Orthodox bishop thought I was
fishing for him and willingly, proudly and defiantly took the bait on
public record, and it wasn't even me. Give me a break." -- Atlanta
Olympiada "Erica" Kane yammered in
Message-ID: >

"It does to a certain extant physically and theoretically
it holds even into the quantum but there observational confirmation is
limited or non existent. That's the problem and the major stumbling
block to field unification. For Dr. Einstein held out that a physical
based field theory should be sought out and not left to quantum
uncertainty of how the universe primly base works. Man made coordinate
systems are fine without knowing from where or what is the base essence
of what the space as deduced field is composed of, but not totally
satisfactory. Anomalies keep space cropping up and scientists have to
keep adjusting for these unexpected events. It's like a blind man that
has memorized his physical surroundings to a point he feels very
comfortable until that one new or unexpected event pops up and he's lost
and fumbling." -- nightbat, in one of his more lucid moments.
Message-ID: >

"Snarky" > wrote in message
news nb.ggghd.bcb.cem.fi...
> On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 17:42:35 -0600, Jerry Sauk wrote these lies, denials,
> arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions, and/or obfuscations:
> > "Snarky" wrote...
> >> On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 14:47:35 -0600, Jerry Sauk wrote these lies,
> >> denials, arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions, and/or
> >> obfuscations:
> >> > "spooge" wrote...
> >> >> "Jerry Sauk" wrote:
> >> >> > "Snarky" wrote...
> >> >> >> On Sun, 26 Oct 2008 16:50:51 +0000, blake murphy wrote these
lies,
> >> >> >> denials, arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions, and/or
> >> >> >> obfuscations:
> >> >> >> > On Sun, 26 Oct 2008 07:49:39 GMT, Snarky wrote:
> >> >> >> >> On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 15:09:43 +0000, blake murphy wrote these
> > lies,
> >> >> >> >> denials, arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions,
and/or
> >> >> >> >> obfuscations:
> >> >> >> >>> On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 12:45:48 GMT, Snarky wrote:
> >> >> >> >>>> On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 19:12:13 -0400, DK wrote these lies,
> >> >> >> >>>> denials, arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions,
> >> >> >> >>>> and/or obfuscations:
> >> >> >> >>>>> Jerry Sauk wrote:
> >> >> >> >>>>>> "Sqwertz" wrote...
> >> >> >> >>>>>>> Jerry Sauk wrote:
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> Didn't you read the Warning's?
> >> >> >> >>>>>>> You mena the one that said From: Jerry Sauk
> >> >> >> >>>>>>> > ??
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Can I write 400 words?
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> No. I don't have time for that.
> >> >> >> >>>>>>> So, what if - by some act of Satan - would you do if
*two*
> >> >> >> >>>>>>> people mailed you their 200-word apologies? That would
be
> >> >> >> >>>>>>> 400 words.
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>> -sw
> >> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>> I have plenty of time for that, if it's from two different
> >> >> >> >>>>>> people. THAT'S why I made the 200-word limit in the first
> >> >> >> >>>>>> place.
> >> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>> I see your still just as big of an idiot as you were
> >> >> >> >>>>>> before.
> >> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>> So that's a *maximum* of 200 words? Limit *would* mean
> > maximum
> >> >> > so...
> >> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>> I apologize for posting that Jerry was dead.
> >> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >> >>>> So, is Jerry a flesh-eating ghoul, a regular zombie, or a
> >> >> >> >>>> vampire?
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >>> i thought he didn't eat anything not served at taco bell or
> >> >> >> >>> burger king.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> So that'd be "flesh-eating ghoul", then.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > i thought taco bell was big on textured vegetable protein.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Burger King, however...not so much.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > And what exactly is textured vegetable protein.
> >> >>
> >> >> You call it your brain.
> >> >
> >> > And how exactly is that a constructive post. Or is that your way of
> >> > admitting your embarrasment that you don't know the asnwer.
> >>
> >> <points and laffs at teh kl00less l00n> "Constructive post." Hee hee.
> >
> > THE QUESTION WAS HOW IS THAT A CONSTRUCTIVE POST, NOT IS IT ONE.
>
> This is usenet. Why are you looking for "constructive" posts here? Look
> for *entertaining*, you'll have much better luck.

I DIDN'T SAY i WAS LOOKNIG CONSTRUCTIVE POSTS, DIPWAD!!!!!!!!!! I said
HOW is that post constructive!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Since
this group is all about fast-food education among other thing's!

"spooge" > wrote in message
...
> "Jerry Sauk" > wrote in
> m:
>
> >
> > "spooge" > wrote in message
> > ...
> >> "Jerry Sauk" > wrote in
> >> news > >>
> >> >
> >> > "Snarky" > wrote in message
> >> > news > >> > iau tp.hc nb.ggghd.bcb.cem.fi...
> >> >> On Sun, 26 Oct 2008 16:50:51 +0000, blake murphy wrote these lies,
> >> >> denials, arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions, and/or
> >> >> obfuscations:
> >> >>
> >> >> > On Sun, 26 Oct 2008 07:49:39 GMT, Snarky wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 15:09:43 +0000, blake murphy wrote these
> >> >> >> lies, denials, arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions,
> >> >> >> and/or obfuscations:
> >> >> >>> On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 12:45:48 GMT, Snarky wrote:
> >> >> >>>> On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 19:12:13 -0400, DK wrote these lies,
> >> >> >>>> denials, arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions,
> >> >> >>>> and/or obfuscations:
> >> >> >>>>> Jerry Sauk wrote:
> >> >> >>>>>> "Sqwertz" wrote...
> >> >> >>>>>>> Jerry Sauk wrote:
> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>> Didn't you read the Warning's?
> >> >> >>>>>>> You mena the one that said From: Jerry Sauk
> >> >> >>>>>>> > ??
> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Can I write 400 words?
> >> >> >>>>>>>> No. I don't have time for that.
> >> >> >>>>>>> So, what if - by some act of Satan - would you do if *two*
> >> >> >>>>>>> people mailed you their 200-word apologies? That would be
> >> >> >>>>>>> 400 words.
> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>> -sw
> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>> I have plenty of time for that, if it's from two different
> >> >> >>>>>> people. THAT'S why I made the 200-word limit in the first
> >> >> >>>>>> place.
> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>> I see your still just as big of an idiot as you were
> >> >> >>>>>> before.
> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >>>>> So that's a *maximum* of 200 words? Limit *would* mean
> >> >> >>>>> maximum
> >> > so...
> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >>>>> I apologize for posting that Jerry was dead.
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>> So, is Jerry a flesh-eating ghoul, a regular zombie, or a
> >> >> >>>> vampire?
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> i thought he didn't eat anything not served at taco bell or
> >> >> >>> burger king.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> So that'd be "flesh-eating ghoul", then.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > i thought taco bell was big on textured vegetable protein.
> >> >>
> >> >> Burger King, however...not so much.
> >> >
> >> > And what exactly is textured vegetable protein.
> >>
> >> You call it your brain.
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Black Metal ist Krieg
> >
> > And how exactly is that a constructive post.
>
> Dear Jerry, it is a constructive post in that it provides, in clear,
> concise and precise language, the correct answer to your question.
>
> > Or is that your way of admitting your embarrasment that you don't know
> > the asnwer.
>
> On the contrary, dear Jerry, my response proved that I do indeed know the
> correct answer. And to top it off, being the very nice Usenet entity that
> I am, I shared that answer with you and I refrained from pointing out to
> that had you not been recently dead, you might have known the answer
> yourself.
>
> Is there anything else I can clarify for you at this time, Jerry?

Yes. Why exactly are you behaving like an ass towards me.

TFM® wrote:
>
> "ah" > wrote
>
>>> This is usenet. Why are you looking for "constructive" posts here? Look
>>> for *entertaining*, you'll have much better luck.
>>
>> http://www.nasa.gov/mov/285943main_R...mage%205.7.mov
>
>
> Is that wisconsin? I knew there was no intelligent life there.

Tampa.

duh
--
ah

Jerry Sauk wrote:
> "Snarky" > wrote in message
> news > nb.ggghd.bcb.cem.fi...
>> On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 17:42:35 -0600, Jerry Sauk wrote these lies, denials,
>> arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions, and/or obfuscations:
>> > "Snarky" wrote...
>> >> On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 14:47:35 -0600, Jerry Sauk wrote these lies,
>> >> denials, arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions, and/or
>> >> obfuscations:
>> >> > "spooge" wrote...
>> >> >> "Jerry Sauk" wrote:
>> >> >> > "Snarky" wrote...
>> >> >> >> On Sun, 26 Oct 2008 16:50:51 +0000, blake murphy wrote these
> lies,
>> >> >> >> denials, arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions, and/or
>> >> >> >> obfuscations:
>> >> >> >> > On Sun, 26 Oct 2008 07:49:39 GMT, Snarky wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 15:09:43 +0000, blake murphy wrote these
>> > lies,
>> >> >> >> >> denials, arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions,
> and/or
>> >> >> >> >> obfuscations:
>> >> >> >> >>> On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 12:45:48 GMT, Snarky wrote:
>> >> >> >> >>>> On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 19:12:13 -0400, DK wrote these lies,
>> >> >> >> >>>> denials, arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions,
>> >> >> >> >>>> and/or obfuscations:
>> >> >> >> >>>>> Jerry Sauk wrote:
>> >> >> >> >>>>>> "Sqwertz" wrote...
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>> Jerry Sauk wrote:
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> Didn't you read the Warning's?
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>> You mena the one that said From: Jerry Sauk
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>> > ??
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Can I write 400 words?
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> No. I don't have time for that.
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>> So, what if - by some act of Satan - would you do if
> *two*
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>> people mailed you their 200-word apologies? That would
> be
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>> 400 words.
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>> -sw
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>> I have plenty of time for that, if it's from two different
>> >> >> >> >>>>>> people. THAT'S why I made the 200-word limit in the first
>> >> >> >> >>>>>> place.
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>> I see your still just as big of an idiot as you were
>> >> >> >> >>>>>> before.
>> >> >> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>> So that's a *maximum* of 200 words? Limit *would* mean
>> > maximum
>> >> >> > so...
>> >> >> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>> I apologize for posting that Jerry was dead.
>> >> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>> So, is Jerry a flesh-eating ghoul, a regular zombie, or a
>> >> >> >> >>>> vampire?
>> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >> >>> i thought he didn't eat anything not served at taco bell or
>> >> >> >> >>> burger king.
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> So that'd be "flesh-eating ghoul", then.
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > i thought taco bell was big on textured vegetable protein.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Burger King, however...not so much.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > And what exactly is textured vegetable protein.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> You call it your brain.
>> >> >
>> >> > And how exactly is that a constructive post. Or is that your way of
>> >> > admitting your embarrasment that you don't know the asnwer.
>> >>
>> >> <points and laffs at teh kl00less l00n> "Constructive post." Hee hee.
>> >
>> > THE QUESTION WAS HOW IS THAT A CONSTRUCTIVE POST, NOT IS IT ONE.
>>
>> This is usenet. Why are you looking for "constructive" posts here? Look
>> for *entertaining*, you'll have much better luck.
>
> I DIDN'T SAY i WAS LOOKNIG CONSTRUCTIVE POSTS, DIPWAD!!!!!!!!!! I said
> HOW is that post constructive!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Since
> this group is all about fast-food education among other thing's!

Constructivist epistemological teleology is proscribed in alt.****nozzles

Please see the FAQ. It's a good idea to read a while before posting.
--
ah

"Sqwertz" > wrote in message
...
> Paco > wrote:
>
>> Sorry Greg, but I'm not Steve.
>
> You don't have to explain anything to him. He's less than nothing.
>
> -sw (Raising a taco to Paco)

Well, I just want to be careful and not sully your good name!

-sw

"Jerry Sauk" > wrote in
m:

>
> "Snarky" > wrote in message
> news > tp.hc nb.ggghd.bcb.cem.fi...
>> On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 17:42:35 -0600, Jerry Sauk wrote these lies,
>> denials, arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions, and/or
>> obfuscations:
>> > "Snarky" wrote...
>> >> On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 14:47:35 -0600, Jerry Sauk wrote these lies,
>> >> denials, arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions, and/or
>> >> obfuscations:
>> >> > "spooge" wrote...
>> >> >> "Jerry Sauk" wrote:

[...]

>> >> >> > And what exactly is textured vegetable protein.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> You call it your brain.
>> >> >
>> >> > And how exactly is that a constructive post. Or is that your
>> >> > way of admitting your embarrasment that you don't know the
>> >> > asnwer.
>> >>
>> >> <points and laffs at teh kl00less l00n> "Constructive post." Hee
>> >> hee.
>> >
>> > THE QUESTION WAS HOW IS THAT A CONSTRUCTIVE POST, NOT IS IT ONE.
>>
>> This is usenet. Why are you looking for "constructive" posts here?
>> Look for *entertaining*, you'll have much better luck.
>
> I DIDN'T SAY i WAS LOOKNIG CONSTRUCTIVE POSTS, DIPWAD!!!!!!!!!! I
> said
> HOW is that post constructive!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
> Since this group is all about fast-food education among other thing's!

Hey there, Mister. Have you been dead or something the past couple of
months? Don't you know that global commodities are in a flux? Why are you
hoarding such a huge supply of exclamation marks when so many Netizens are
going without?

I declare, in this one post of yours you've needlessly, and shamelessly
too, used almost 50 of the precious punctuation marks where 3 or perhaps 4
would have been more than sufficient.

And I haven't even mentioned your wasteful expending of scarce upper case
letter supplies.

For shame.

--
Black Metal ist Krieg

"Jerry Sauk" > wrote in
m:

>
> "spooge" > wrote in message
> ...
>> "Jerry Sauk" > wrote in
>> m:
>>
>> >
>> > "spooge" > wrote in message
>> > ...
>> >> "Jerry Sauk" > wrote in
>> >> news >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> > "Snarky" > wrote in message
>> >> > news >> >> > hid iau tp.hc nb.ggghd.bcb.cem.fi...
>> >> >> On Sun, 26 Oct 2008 16:50:51 +0000, blake murphy wrote these
>> >> >> lies, denials, arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions,
>> >> >> and/or obfuscations:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > On Sun, 26 Oct 2008 07:49:39 GMT, Snarky wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 15:09:43 +0000, blake murphy wrote these
>> >> >> >> lies, denials, arrogant assertions, erroneous
>> >> >> >> presuppositions, and/or obfuscations:
>> >> >> >>> On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 12:45:48 GMT, Snarky wrote:
>> >> >> >>>> On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 19:12:13 -0400, DK wrote these lies,
>> >> >> >>>> denials, arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions,
>> >> >> >>>> and/or obfuscations:
>> >> >> >>>>> Jerry Sauk wrote:
>> >> >> >>>>>> "Sqwertz" wrote...
>> >> >> >>>>>>> Jerry Sauk wrote:
>> >> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>> Didn't you read the Warning's?
>> >> >> >>>>>>> You mena the one that said From: Jerry Sauk
>> >> >> >>>>>>> > ??
>> >> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Can I write 400 words?
>> >> >> >>>>>>>> No. I don't have time for that.
>> >> >> >>>>>>> So, what if - by some act of Satan - would you do if
>> >> >> >>>>>>> *two* people mailed you their 200-word apologies? That
>> >> >> >>>>>>> would be 400 words.
>> >> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>> -sw
>> >> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>> I have plenty of time for that, if it's from two
>> >> >> >>>>>> different people. THAT'S why I made the 200-word limit
>> >> >> >>>>>> in the first place.
>> >> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>> I see your still just as big of an idiot as you were
>> >> >> >>>>>> before.
>> >> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>> So that's a *maximum* of 200 words? Limit *would* mean
>> >> >> >>>>> maximum
>> >> > so...
>> >> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>> I apologize for posting that Jerry was dead.
>> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >>>> So, is Jerry a flesh-eating ghoul, a regular zombie, or a
>> >> >> >>>> vampire?
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> i thought he didn't eat anything not served at taco bell or
>> >> >> >>> burger king.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> So that'd be "flesh-eating ghoul", then.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > i thought taco bell was big on textured vegetable protein.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Burger King, however...not so much.
>> >> >
>> >> > And what exactly is textured vegetable protein.
>> >>
>> >> You call it your brain.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Black Metal ist Krieg
>> >
>> > And how exactly is that a constructive post.
>>
>> Dear Jerry, it is a constructive post in that it provides, in clear,
>> concise and precise language, the correct answer to your question.
>>
>> > Or is that your way of admitting your embarrasment that you don't
>> > know the asnwer.
>>
>> On the contrary, dear Jerry, my response proved that I do indeed know
>> the correct answer. And to top it off, being the very nice Usenet
>> entity that I am, I shared that answer with you and I refrained from
>> pointing out to that had you not been recently dead, you might have
>> known the answer yourself.
>>
>> Is there anything else I can clarify for you at this time, Jerry?
>
> Yes. Why exactly are you behaving like an ass towards me.

Oh dear. Oh my. Oh my dear.

Here I was providing a fellow Usenetizen with helpful guidance, and now I
am accused of, well, something distasteful.

In my Usenet-youth, I'd have taken your off-color question as a challenge,
and taken you to task, sir, by way of responses that would have included
words of 4, 5 and even 6 letter length intended to visit unto you the wrath
of my ummm.... wrath. The 4 letter words in particular.

But have no fear, I won't yield to my Usenet animal instincts, so to speak,
and disembowel you - figuratively speaking - since I long ago learned that
in this arena the sharpest blades sing the sweetest songs silently.


--
Black Metal ist Krieg

Jerry Sauk > writes:

> Well a large number of people want out of the kill-file,
> but none of them wants to admit responsibility for what
> they did.


What exactly did they do, Jerry? **** you off?

The only person who can allow you to be ****ed off
is you. Therefore the ultimate responsibility for
your reaction to people saying you were dead rests
on _your_ shoulders, not on anybody else's.

Nobody is apologizing because nobody has anything to
apologize for. Except you, to the rest of us, for
trying to shift blame away from yourself.



Geoff

--
"Liberals indignantly reject the label 'domestic terrorists'
for former Weathermen, preferring to call them 'future
Cabinet members.'" -- Ann Coulter

Jerry Sauk > writes:

> Asking and demanding are the same thing Geoff, except
> one is a little stronger asking.

: When you "ask" someone for something, you express your
: preference while leaving their compliance up to their
: discretion.

: When you *demand* something of someone, though, you don't
: leave them the option of saying "no." You're essentially
: telling them that they have no choice.


> Which exactly the same thing I just said, just in your
> own words.

No, it *isn't* the same thing, Jerry. I explained above
why not. Re-read what I wrote earlier.



Geoff

--
"Liberals indignantly reject the label 'domestic terrorists'
for former Weathermen, preferring to call them 'future
Cabinet members.'" -- Ann Coulter

Jerry Sauk > writes:

: The crucial difference, Jerry, is that I don't flame you for
: not trimming posts *on the basis that you're wasting bandwidth.*
: I do it on the basis that you force readers to scroll down past
: material that they've already read at least once before.

> Are you trying to tell me your life is so important that you
> don't have time to scroll down???

No. I'm trying to tell you that whether I have the time or not,
I shouldn't have to.

In other words, Jerry, it isn't about time. It's about showing
consideration for other people. Something that you definitely
need to learn more about.


> Maybe *I* dont have time to do the trimming!!!

If you have time to fart around on Usenet to begin with, you
have time to trim away excessive quoted text. Now stop making
these stupid "Nothing is ever myu fault" arguments, pull your
BVDs out of your sweaty asscrack, and hop to it.



Geoff

--
"Liberals indignantly reject the label 'domestic terrorists'
for former Weathermen, preferring to call them 'future
Cabinet members.'" -- Ann Coulter

On 2008-10-31, Geoff Miller > wrote:

> "Liberals indignantly reject the label 'domestic terrorists'
> for former Weathermen, preferring to call them 'future
> Cabinet members.'" -- Ann Coulter

Anyone quoting Ann Coulter should be flogged around the fleet. The bitch is
an embarrassment to, men, women, and anyone with a brain. She should be
spread-eagle over a nest of impotent Democrats.

nb

Paco > writes:

> "Entering" on one side, "leaving" on the other. <cue rimshot>


Goddammit!



Geoff

--
"Liberals indignantly reject the label 'domestic terrorists'
for former Weathermen, preferring to call them 'future
Cabinet members.'" -- Ann Coulter

Snarky > writes:

> On opposite sides...After all, most roads in and out of town are
> two-way, right?


ObJerry: "B-but...who said anything about being a two-way street?
There are *lots* of one-way streets in the world! Yeah, that's
the ticket: it was a one-way street!"



Geoff

--
"Liberals indignantly reject the label 'domestic terrorists'
for former Weathermen, preferring to call them 'future
Cabinet members.'" -- Ann Coulter

notbob > writes:

> Anyone quoting Ann Coulter should be flogged around the fleet.

Arrr! Being a sailor, that nautical talk never fails to stir
my manhood.

Usually it takes a little longer for anyone to respond when I
quote Ann Coulter in my .sig, though. All this, and it's
Friday, too!


> The bitch is an embarrassment to, men, women, and anyone
> with a brain.

Well, I obviously have a brain, as evidenced by my writing,
and I happen to think she's both hilarious and spot-on.

She's actually quite intelligent and educated (she graduated
_*** laude_ from Cornell and has a law degree from the Univ-
ersity Of Michigan). That's why she's so well-equipped to
**** people off as much as she does.


> She should be spread-eagle over a nest of impotent Democrats.

So what specifically has she ever said or written that you
took issue with, and why?

As far as I've seen (and I've seen a lot, owning copies of
most of her books as I do and being a faithful reader of her
columns as I am), all she's "guilty" of is speaking truth to
Democrats.

Disagree though we may, here's a little something to show
that my heart's in the right place:

http://i****edanncoulterintheasshard.blogspot.com/

It's very well-written, and the author captured Ann's persona
very well.



Geoff

--
"Liberals indignantly reject the label 'domestic terrorists'
for former Weathermen, preferring to call them 'future
Cabinet members.'" -- Ann Coulter

On 2008-10-31, Geoff Miller > wrote:

> So what specifically has she ever said or written that you
> took issue with, and why?

She's a buffer buffoon for the radical right, a clown in slut's clothing to
distract the easily distracted. To admit remembering anything she ever said
would be an admission it warranted the effort. which it doesn't.

nb

"ah" > wrote in message
anews.com...
> Jerry Sauk wrote:
> > "Snarky" > wrote in message
> >
news
> > nb.ggghd.bcb.cem.fi...
> >> On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 17:42:35 -0600, Jerry Sauk wrote these lies,
denials,
> >> arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions, and/or obfuscations:
> >> > "Snarky" wrote...
> >> >> On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 14:47:35 -0600, Jerry Sauk wrote these lies,
> >> >> denials, arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions, and/or
> >> >> obfuscations:
> >> >> > "spooge" wrote...
> >> >> >> "Jerry Sauk" wrote:
> >> >> >> > "Snarky" wrote...
> >> >> >> >> On Sun, 26 Oct 2008 16:50:51 +0000, blake murphy wrote these
> > lies,
> >> >> >> >> denials, arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions,
and/or
> >> >> >> >> obfuscations:
> >> >> >> >> > On Sun, 26 Oct 2008 07:49:39 GMT, Snarky wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >> On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 15:09:43 +0000, blake murphy wrote
these
> >> > lies,
> >> >> >> >> >> denials, arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions,
> > and/or
> >> >> >> >> >> obfuscations:
> >> >> >> >> >>> On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 12:45:48 GMT, Snarky wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >>>> On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 19:12:13 -0400, DK wrote these lies,
> >> >> >> >> >>>> denials, arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions,
> >> >> >> >> >>>> and/or obfuscations:
> >> >> >> >> >>>>> Jerry Sauk wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> "Sqwertz" wrote...
> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> Jerry Sauk wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> Didn't you read the Warning's?
> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> You mena the one that said From: Jerry Sauk
> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> > ??
> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Can I write 400 words?
> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> No. I don't have time for that.
> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> So, what if - by some act of Satan - would you do if
> > *two*
> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> people mailed you their 200-word apologies? That
would
> > be
> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> 400 words.
> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> -sw
> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> I have plenty of time for that, if it's from two
different
> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> people. THAT'S why I made the 200-word limit in the
first
> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> place.
> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> I see your still just as big of an idiot as you were
> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> before.
> >> >> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >> >>>>> So that's a *maximum* of 200 words? Limit *would* mean
> >> > maximum
> >> >> >> > so...
> >> >> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >> >>>>> I apologize for posting that Jerry was dead.
> >> >> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >> >> >>>> So, is Jerry a flesh-eating ghoul, a regular zombie, or a
> >> >> >> >> >>>> vampire?
> >> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >> >>> i thought he didn't eat anything not served at taco bell
or
> >> >> >> >> >>> burger king.
> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >> So that'd be "flesh-eating ghoul", then.
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> > i thought taco bell was big on textured vegetable protein.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> Burger King, however...not so much.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > And what exactly is textured vegetable protein.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> You call it your brain.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > And how exactly is that a constructive post. Or is that your way
of
> >> >> > admitting your embarrasment that you don't know the asnwer.
> >> >>
> >> >> <points and laffs at teh kl00less l00n> "Constructive post." Hee
hee.
> >> >
> >> > THE QUESTION WAS HOW IS THAT A CONSTRUCTIVE POST, NOT IS IT ONE.
> >>
> >> This is usenet. Why are you looking for "constructive" posts here? Look
> >> for *entertaining*, you'll have much better luck.
> >
> > I DIDN'T SAY i WAS LOOKNIG CONSTRUCTIVE POSTS, DIPWAD!!!!!!!!!! I
said
> > HOW is that post constructive!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Since
> > this group is all about fast-food education among other thing's!
>
> Constructivist epistemological teleology is proscribed in alt.****nozzles
>
> Please see the FAQ. It's a good idea to read a while before posting.
> --

I never posted this shit to alt.****nozzles. I dont even know what a
****nozzle is. Get teh hell out of alt.fast-food unless you want to
discuss on-topic discussion's about fast-food.

"spooge" > wrote in message
...
> "Jerry Sauk" > wrote in
> m:
>
> >
> > "spooge" > wrote in message
> > ...
> >> "Jerry Sauk" > wrote in
> >> m:
> >>
> >> >
> >> > "spooge" > wrote in message
> >> > ...
> >> >> "Jerry Sauk" > wrote in
> >> >> news > >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >> > "Snarky" > wrote in message
> >> >> > news > >> >> > hid iau tp.hc nb.ggghd.bcb.cem.fi...
> >> >> >> On Sun, 26 Oct 2008 16:50:51 +0000, blake murphy wrote these
> >> >> >> lies, denials, arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions,
> >> >> >> and/or obfuscations:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> > On Sun, 26 Oct 2008 07:49:39 GMT, Snarky wrote:
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 15:09:43 +0000, blake murphy wrote these
> >> >> >> >> lies, denials, arrogant assertions, erroneous
> >> >> >> >> presuppositions, and/or obfuscations:
> >> >> >> >>> On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 12:45:48 GMT, Snarky wrote:
> >> >> >> >>>> On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 19:12:13 -0400, DK wrote these lies,
> >> >> >> >>>> denials, arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions,
> >> >> >> >>>> and/or obfuscations:
> >> >> >> >>>>> Jerry Sauk wrote:
> >> >> >> >>>>>> "Sqwertz" wrote...
> >> >> >> >>>>>>> Jerry Sauk wrote:
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> Didn't you read the Warning's?
> >> >> >> >>>>>>> You mena the one that said From: Jerry Sauk
> >> >> >> >>>>>>> > ??
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Can I write 400 words?
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> No. I don't have time for that.
> >> >> >> >>>>>>> So, what if - by some act of Satan - would you do if
> >> >> >> >>>>>>> *two* people mailed you their 200-word apologies? That
> >> >> >> >>>>>>> would be 400 words.
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>> -sw
> >> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>> I have plenty of time for that, if it's from two
> >> >> >> >>>>>> different people. THAT'S why I made the 200-word limit
> >> >> >> >>>>>> in the first place.
> >> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>> I see your still just as big of an idiot as you were
> >> >> >> >>>>>> before.
> >> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>> So that's a *maximum* of 200 words? Limit *would* mean
> >> >> >> >>>>> maximum
> >> >> > so...
> >> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>> I apologize for posting that Jerry was dead.
> >> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >> >>>> So, is Jerry a flesh-eating ghoul, a regular zombie, or a
> >> >> >> >>>> vampire?
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >>> i thought he didn't eat anything not served at taco bell or
> >> >> >> >>> burger king.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> So that'd be "flesh-eating ghoul", then.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > i thought taco bell was big on textured vegetable protein.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Burger King, however...not so much.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > And what exactly is textured vegetable protein.
> >> >>
> >> >> You call it your brain.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> --
> >> >> Black Metal ist Krieg
> >> >
> >> > And how exactly is that a constructive post.
> >>
> >> Dear Jerry, it is a constructive post in that it provides, in clear,
> >> concise and precise language, the correct answer to your question.
> >>
> >> > Or is that your way of admitting your embarrasment that you don't
> >> > know the asnwer.
> >>
> >> On the contrary, dear Jerry, my response proved that I do indeed know
> >> the correct answer. And to top it off, being the very nice Usenet
> >> entity that I am, I shared that answer with you and I refrained from
> >> pointing out to that had you not been recently dead, you might have
> >> known the answer yourself.
> >>
> >> Is there anything else I can clarify for you at this time, Jerry?
> >
> > Yes. Why exactly are you behaving like an ass towards me.
>
> Oh dear. Oh my. Oh my dear.
>
> Here I was providing a fellow Usenetizen with helpful guidance, and now I
> am accused of, well, something distasteful.

Uhhh......... excuse me but since WHEN is calling my brain textured
vegetable protien HELPFUL GUIDANCE?????????? Not to mention the fact that
you reffered to my ficticious "death".

On Fri, 31 Oct 2008 21:27:00 -0600, Jerry Sauk did most oddly state:
> "ah" wrote...
>> Jerry Sauk wrote:
>> > "Snarky" wrote...
>> >> On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 17:42:35 -0600, Jerry Sauk wrote these lies,
> denials,
>> >> arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions, and/or obfuscations:
>> >> > "Snarky" wrote...
>> >> >> On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 14:47:35 -0600, Jerry Sauk wrote these lies,
>> >> >> denials, arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions, and/or
>> >> >> obfuscations:
>> >> >> > "spooge" wrote...
>> >> >> >> "Jerry Sauk" wrote:
>> >> >> >> > "Snarky" wrote...
>> >> >> >> >> On Sun, 26 Oct 2008 16:50:51 +0000, blake murphy wrote these
>> > lies,
>> >> >> >> >> denials, arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions,
> and/or
>> >> >> >> >> obfuscations:
>> >> >> >> >> > On Sun, 26 Oct 2008 07:49:39 GMT, Snarky wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 15:09:43 +0000, blake murphy wrote
> these
>> >> > lies,
>> >> >> >> >> >> denials, arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions,
>> > and/or
>> >> >> >> >> >> obfuscations:
>> >> >> >> >> >>> On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 12:45:48 GMT, Snarky wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >>>> On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 19:12:13 -0400, DK wrote these
>> >> >> >> >> >>>> lies, denials, arrogant assertions, erroneous
>> >> >> >> >> >>>> presuppositions, and/or obfuscations:
>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> Jerry Sauk wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> "Sqwertz" wrote...
>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> Jerry Sauk wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> Didn't you read the Warning's?
>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> You mena the one that said From: Jerry Sauk
>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> > ??
>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Can I write 400 words?
>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> No. I don't have time for that.
>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> So, what if - by some act of Satan - would you do if
>> > *two*
>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> people mailed you their 200-word apologies? That
> would
>> > be
>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> 400 words.
>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> -sw
>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> I have plenty of time for that, if it's from two
> different
>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> people. THAT'S why I made the 200-word limit in the
> first
>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> place.
>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> I see your still just as big of an idiot as you were
>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> before.
>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> So that's a *maximum* of 200 words? Limit *would*
>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> mean
>> >> > maximum
>> >> >> >> > so...
>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> I apologize for posting that Jerry was dead.
>> >> >> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >> >> >>>> So, is Jerry a flesh-eating ghoul, a regular zombie, or
>> >> >> >> >> >>>> a vampire?
>> >> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >> >> >>> i thought he didn't eat anything not served at taco bell
> or
>> >> >> >> >> >>> burger king.
>> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> So that'd be "flesh-eating ghoul", then.
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> > i thought taco bell was big on textured vegetable protein.
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> Burger King, however...not so much.
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > And what exactly is textured vegetable protein.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> You call it your brain.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > And how exactly is that a constructive post. Or is that your
>> >> >> > way
> of
>> >> >> > admitting your embarrasment that you don't know the asnwer.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> <points and laffs at teh kl00less l00n> "Constructive post." Hee
> hee.
>> >> >
>> >> > THE QUESTION WAS HOW IS THAT A CONSTRUCTIVE POST, NOT IS IT ONE.
>> >>
>> >> This is usenet. Why are you looking for "constructive" posts here?
>> >> Look for *entertaining*, you'll have much better luck.
>> >
>> > I DIDN'T SAY i WAS LOOKNIG CONSTRUCTIVE POSTS, DIPWAD!!!!!!!!!! I
> said
>> > HOW is that post constructive!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
> Since
>> > this group is all about fast-food education among other thing's!
>>
>> Constructivist epistemological teleology is proscribed in
>> alt.****nozzles
>>
>> Please see the FAQ. It's a good idea to read a while before posting. --
>
> I never posted this shit to alt.****nozzles. I dont even know what a
> ****nozzle is. Get teh hell out of alt.fast-food unless you want to
> discuss on-topic discussion's about fast-food.

Or else you'll cry and scream and kick the floor, ****nozzle?

--
__________________________________________________ ______________________
Hail Eris! mhm 29x21; TM#5; Chung Convict #28; Usenet Ruiner #5
Demon Lord of Confusion; Official Chung Demon; Top Asshole #3
Superfaggot; Wingnut's #1 World Class Coward (next to the French)
COOSN-029-06-71069; Most Hated Usenetizen of All Time #13; Lits Slut #16
Gutter Chix0r #17; BowTie's Spuriously Accused Pedo Photographer #4
AUK Psycho & Felon #21; Parrot & Zombie #2; AUK Hate Machine Cog #19
Anonymous Psycho Criminal #18
The posting nym is best removed from my posting address if your goal is
to speak with me in private.
Supreme High Overlord of rec.radio.*
"Atheists are people who have no invisible means of support"
Join my RuneScape clan!
http://z11.invisionfree.com/Holy_Pre...abal/index.php
Full name of clan: Cabal of the Holy International Discordian Internet
And Usenet Terrorist Pretzel
A message to Tory scum: The environment is still more important than the
economy. The stock market goes up and down, and only fools think they
can control it.

"Canada is going to hades quickly with the Fag laws and the drug
problem." -- A self-professed "former kookologist" (around at the very
beginning, in fact) has an interesting definition of "quickly".
Message-ID: >

"A dog in the video I watched ****ed a human woman. The dog consented to
it and the woman consented to it. That is like one *** man consenting to
having sex with another. Do you approve of it?" -- Agamemnon watches
bestiality porn and compares it to *** sex. Message-ID:
>
http://www.kookpedia.net/index.php/Agamemnon

"I know how you special busboys are.
You're crazy." -- John "special busboy" Wentzky, in Message-ID:
>

"Roe V Wade has zero bearing on my existence other than it affects it
adversely."
-- Johnny Wentzky never had much truck with "logic". Message-ID:
>

"F!ck moderation, free speech is a masculinist proverb and that's what
feminist manvagina's like yourself." -- posted
before finishing a thought, in MID:
. com>

"Fredbot == SameAsB4 == TGOOS

"You are stalking me, even after I thrashed ya." -- PorchMonkey4Life,
a veritable combination of Sherlock Holmes and Doc Savage for the 21st
Century. No, really. Would I lie? MID: <zaUqh.2972$E35.415@trnddc02>

"He unleashes a fecal explosion he time he posts. He uses so many nyms
because he gets beaten so easily and so convincingly in flame wars and
tries to hide behind nyms in the hopes of getting a fresh start. To bad
for him that his lameness keep shining through like a beacon for all
tards (e.g., SameAs$B4, Demon Spawn, Barbara's Pus$y, FredBot,
TGOOS, ......, etc)" -- Monkey-man identifies <jitter> as me, among
others, in broken English, in MID: <Z_Xqh.3167$E35.215@trnddc02>

Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle
Trainer of the above k00k
http://www.screedbomb.info/porchie/

Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, June 2008
Hammer of Thor, July 2008

"Q: What do you call someone in the White House who is honest, caring,
and well-read?
A: A tourist." -- Anonymous

"It would be offly hard for any of you to abuse me on usenet. Really. I
have the advantage. I could easily turn alt.usenet.kooks into a cesspool
of encoded posts. Bringing the noise ratio up so high as to make the
group worthless. Anybody who can code could do this, why nobody has
bothered before now is beyond me. The ultimate spamming engine..
'BAWAHAHA'" -- Dustbin "Outer Filth" K00k's delusions of grandeur
reached new heights, in Message-ID:
>
"Immorality: The morality of those who are having a better time." -- H.
L. Mencken

"Consider that language a moment. 'Purposefully and materially
supported hostilities against the United States' is in the eye of the
beholder, and this administration has proven itself to be astonishingly
impatient with criticism of any kind. The broad powers given to Bush by
this legislation allow him to capture, indefinitely detain, and refuse a
hearing to any American citizen who speaks out against Iraq or any other
part of the so-called 'War on Terror.'

"If you write a letter to the editor attacking Bush, you could be
deemed as purposefully and materially supporting hostilities against the
United States. If you organize or join a public demonstration against
Iraq, or against the administration, the same designation could befall
you. One dark-comedy aspect of the legislation is that senators or House
members who publicly disagree with Bush, criticize him, or organize
investigations into his dealings could be placed under the same
designation. In effect, Congress just gave Bush the power to lock them
up." -- William Rivers Pitt

"It has become clear in recent months that a critical mass of the American
people have seen through the lies of the Bush administration; with the
president's polls at an historic low, growing resistance to the war Iraq,
and the Democrats likely to take back the Congress in mid-term elections,
the Bush administration is on the ropes. And so it is particularly
worrying that President Bush has seen fit, at this juncture to, in effect,
declare himself dictator." -- Frank Morales
http://www.uruknet.biz/?p=m27769&hd=0&size=1&l=e&fark

"Right you are correct. Someone hooked me. I do believe in building
relationships. That is what Christians are required to do. I am amoral.
I am sure you know what that means. So are Scorpios. I am being
'protected' by the Formosa Rule because of my 'mental illness'. I am not
targeting 'teh Mop Jockey'. You are and you are using me as a bait.
Please stop. I have my own fish to reel in. Leave me alone. It is my hope
that I will be able to catch a fish and reel it in for you. Once my
retired bishop thought I was fishing for him and he took the bait, alas
it wasn't me and that spelled the demise of our relationship. Have a
little bit more faith in me. An Eastern Orthodox bishop thought I was
fishing for him and willingly, proudly and defiantly took the bait on
public record, and it wasn't even me. Give me a break." -- Atlanta
Olympiada "Erica" Kane yammered in
Message-ID: >

"It does to a certain extant physically and theoretically
it holds even into the quantum but there observational confirmation is
limited or non existent. That's the problem and the major stumbling
block to field unification. For Dr. Einstein held out that a physical
based field theory should be sought out and not left to quantum
uncertainty of how the universe primly base works. Man made coordinate
systems are fine without knowing from where or what is the base essence
of what the space as deduced field is composed of, but not totally
satisfactory. Anomalies keep space cropping up and scientists have to
keep adjusting for these unexpected events. It's like a blind man that
has memorized his physical surroundings to a point he feels very
comfortable until that one new or unexpected event pops up and he's lost
and fumbling." -- nightbat, in one of his more lucid moments.
Message-ID: >

notbob > writes:

[Ann Coulter]

: So what specifically has she ever said or written that
: you took issue with, and why?

> She's a buffer buffoon for the radical right, a clown in
> slut's clothing to distract the easily distracted.

Oh, come on: we both know that given the opportunity, you'd
do her in a metric heartbeat.

Okay, a slut's clothing, I'll grant you -- albeit, only in
the context of the dust jacket photos for her books. But
what exactly is a "buffer buffoon?" As much as I pride
myself on my knowledge of colorful figures of speech, I
have to admit, that's a new one on me.


> To admit remembering anything she ever said would be an
> admission it warranted the effort. which it doesn't.

Translation:

You can't name anything she wrote, let alone explain why
you disagreed with it, because you haven't *read* anything
that she's written. You're just denouncing her because
like all your fellow libbo-droids who march in lockstep
to attack Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity and Bill O'Reilly
(about whom I've made the same challenge to others, by the
way), you're just parroting the mindless liberal party
line.

In other words, you're sneering at her because you feel
that you're *supposed* to.

In still other words, you're prattling out your patoot.
Way to go, Mr. Iconoclast. Way to be a *free thinker.*

Thanks for playing right into my hands, just like I knew
you would. Liberals just can't resist any opportunity
to lip off. That's why you folks love bumper stickers
so much: everyone is entitled to *your* opinion. Your
transmit keys are all stuck.

Too bad that urge to spew isn't accompanied by a conco-
mitant urge to *think* first, or you'd be able to avoid
walking into traps like the one I set for you. Alas,
liberals are first and foremost herd animals. If the
herd is sneering at Ann Coulter, you, too, must sneer
at Ann Coulter. Or risk excommunication. Or something.

As an aside, that's why the Prius has always outsold the
Honda hybrids. Being herd animals, liberals crave the
approval and validation of their peers. And with a Prius,
everyone knows you're driving a hybrid. The Hondas, in
contrast, look just like their non-hybrid stablemates.

It's also one reason why liberals hate George W. Bush so
much. You resent him for depriving you of the approval
and validation of your Euro-socialist peers.

From time to time, a liberal friend of mine here in Santa
Cruz will send me a link to some article or other, wherein
a person one would expect to be on my side of the political
fence will come out for Obama. His point is obviously that
since I otherwise respect these people's points of view, I
should immediately change my position vis-a-vis the election
to align with theirs and defect to the Obamessiah. (Why
doesn't he conclude that those people should change *their*
views to align with *mine?*)

I keep trying to explain to him that conservatives' minds
just don't work that way -- that we're independent thinkers,
not pack animals. Thus far, he has yet to demonstrate that
he's managed to wrap his brain around that distinction.

So what did you think of "I ****ed Ann Coulter In the Ass,
Hard"?



Geoff

--
"Convictions cause conflict." -- George F. Will

"Geoff Miller" > wrote in message
...
>
>
> notbob > writes:
>
> [Ann Coulter]
>
> : So what specifically has she ever said or written that
> : you took issue with, and why?
>
>> She's a buffer buffoon for the radical right, a clown in
>> slut's clothing to distract the easily distracted.
>
> Oh, come on: we both know that given the opportunity, you'd
> do her in a metric heartbeat.
>

Are you talking about ****ing Ann Coulter? She looks like a horse.