wrote:>
>I meant Orlando, self-appointed champion and mouthpiece for the
>poverty-stricken.

The poor don't need me as a mouthpiece, b ut how many of them frequent usenet?

Orlando

wrote:>
>I meant Orlando, self-appointed champion and mouthpiece for the
>poverty-stricken.

The poor surely do not need me as a mouthpiece, but how many of them frequent
usenet?

Orlando

Steve Pope wrote:
> Gorgon Ramsey > wrote:
>
>
>>On 25-Oct-2008, (Steve Pope) wrote:
>
>
>>>But lamb pathia just happens to be an
>>>excellent combination.
>
>
>>but not as good as lamb and mint sauce.
>
>
> Gack!
>
> It's a good thing there's room for a difference of opinion
> on critical matters such as this!
>
> Steve

There's a Thai restaurant in Berkeley Ca. that makes a "spicy mint
chicken'" that i think is very good. Generally i don't care for 'mint'
even mint and chocolate or a mint julep to say nothing of lamb and mint
sauce but this spicy mint chicken i do like.
--
JL

Joseph Littleshoes > wrote:

>Steve Pope wrote:

>> Gorgon Ramsey > wrote:

>>>On 25-Oct-2008, (Steve Pope) wrote:


>>>>But lamb pathia just happens to be an
>>>>excellent combination.

>>>but not as good as lamb and mint sauce.

>> Gack!

>> It's a good thing there's room for a difference of opinion
>> on critical matters such as this!

>There's a Thai restaurant in Berkeley Ca. that makes a "spicy mint
>chicken'" that i think is very good. Generally i don't care for 'mint'
>even mint and chocolate or a mint julep to say nothing of lamb and mint
>sauce but this spicy mint chicken i do like.

I don't dislike the flavor of mint, and some intact mint
leaf in a curry can be wonderful, it's the "mint sauce" that
I've never seen an appetizing version of, at least that would
go with lamb.

I do sometimes buy jars of English mint, which is sort of
sauce like, and good on say turkey sandwiches. But a plate
of anything, including lamb, swimming in the stuff is
not appetizing to me.

Steve
>JL

James Silverton wrote:
> AFAIK, Pathia *is* a type of Indian dish even if it was originally
> Persian.
>
>

Pathia is definitely an Indian dish. It is often wrongly called Persian
because its origins come from the Parsi community in India, that doesn't
make it Persian, it makes it originally made by Indian people of Persian
descent living in India. It is very different to Persian cuisine.

The same can be said for my personal favourite, the Dhansak. A well done
prawn Dhansak is a joy to behold.

Chong Dak > wrote in news:dDO0l.70222$ir1.36209
@newsfe22.ams2:

> James Silverton wrote:
> > AFAIK, Pathia *is* a type of Indian dish even if it was originally
> > Persian.
> >
> >
>
> Pathia is definitely an Indian dish. It is often wrongly called Persian
> because its origins come from the Parsi community in India, that doesn't
> make it Persian, it makes it originally made by Indian people of Persian
> descent living in India. It is very different to Persian cuisine.
>
> The same can be said for my personal favourite, the Dhansak. A well done
> prawn Dhansak is a joy to behold.
>

Stop it. Stop IT! You're making me hungry.