Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Can you please answer a question?
If I have google groups things blocked like you educated us on a few months back, how come this latest Chinese crap is getting through? I suspect it's not really the same as the stuff that's been blocked but just looks like it. Can you shed some light on it? I'd hate these dickheads to think they can get through the blocks. ta muchly Hoges in WA |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Blinky the Shark wrote:
> Hoges in WA wrote: > >> Can you please answer a question? >> >> If I have google groups things blocked like you educated us on a few months >> back, how come this latest Chinese crap is getting through? > > If you're using the correct filter, then what you see is not from Google > Groups. Exactly! The latest Chinese crap I see is from @yahoo.cn |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hoges in WA wrote:
> Can you please answer a question? > > If I have google groups things blocked like you educated us on a few months > back, how come this latest Chinese crap is getting through? If you're using the correct filter, then what you see is not from Google Groups. Give me the Message-ID number of an example. -- Blinky Killing all posts from Google Groups The Usenet Improvement Project: http://improve-usenet.org Need a new news feed? http://blinkynet.net/comp/newfeed.html |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Blinky the Shark" > wrote in message news ![]() > Hoges in WA wrote: > >> Can you please answer a question? >> >> If I have google groups things blocked like you educated us on a few >> months >> back, how come this latest Chinese crap is getting through? > > If you're using the correct filter, then what you see is not from Google > Groups. > > Give me the Message-ID number of an example. > > > -- > Blinky > Killing all posts from Google Groups > The Usenet Improvement Project: http://improve-usenet.org > Need a new news feed? http://blinkynet.net/comp/newfeed.html > This appears to be it. (or, at least, that's what it says and I copied it) Message-ID: > However, the website they want you to visit is luxury hyphen fashion dot org with no spaces And the "From": line says it's from luxuryfashion underscore org at yahoo dot cn with no spaces. I tried to block the "From" line but OE ignored it and I've already got google groups blocked so I suspect something else but I am not sure what I am looking at. thanks Hoges in WA |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hoges in WA wrote:
> Can you please answer a question? > > If I have google groups things blocked like you educated us on a few > months back, how come this latest Chinese crap is getting through? I > suspect it's not really the same as the stuff that's been blocked but > just looks like it. I don't block Google Groups. However, between whatever news.individual.net does and my own filters, I don't see any spam. Brian -- If televison's a babysitter, the Internet is a drunk librarian who won't shut up. -- Dorothy Gambrell (http://catandgirl.com) |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave Bell wrote:
> Blinky the Shark wrote: >> Hoges in WA wrote: >> >>> Can you please answer a question? >>> >>> If I have google groups things blocked like you educated us on a few months >>> back, how come this latest Chinese crap is getting through? >> >> If you're using the correct filter, then what you see is not from Google >> Groups. > > Exactly! The latest Chinese crap I see is from @yahoo.cn For the record, I don't see those because the news feed I use has good filtering. I saw one piece of spam today in here. I honestly can't remember the last time I saw any. -- Blinky Killing all posts from Google Groups The Usenet Improvement Project: http://improve-usenet.org Need a new news feed? http://blinkynet.net/comp/newfeed.html |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave Bell wrote:
> Blinky the Shark wrote: >> Hoges in WA wrote: >> >>> Can you please answer a question? >>> >>> If I have google groups things blocked like you educated us on a few months >>> back, how come this latest Chinese crap is getting through? >> >> If you're using the correct filter, then what you see is not from Google >> Groups. > > Exactly! The latest Chinese crap I see is from @yahoo.cn If you mean the one "Hoges in WA" just posted the Message-ID header for, no, it's not. It's from Google Groups. The email address given in the From header is at yahoo.cn. But that has NOTHING to do with its origin. My GG filter (as outlined at the UIP link in my sig) kills it. But with my normal news feed *they* have it killed before it can get to me; I don't know what of their rules it triggered, as they don't kill GG posts. I had to go look at the group on another server, that does not do very good (if any) of its own spam filtering to see it at all (and, as I said, even there I only see it if I temporarily disable my GG filter). -- Blinky Killing all posts from Google Groups The Usenet Improvement Project: http://improve-usenet.org |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hoges in WA wrote:
> > "Blinky the Shark" > wrote in message > news ![]() >> Hoges in WA wrote: >> >>> Can you please answer a question? >>> >>> If I have google groups things blocked like you educated us on a few >>> months >>> back, how come this latest Chinese crap is getting through? >> >> If you're using the correct filter, then what you see is not from Google >> Groups. >> >> Give me the Message-ID number of an example. >> >> >> -- >> Blinky >> Killing all posts from Google Groups >> The Usenet Improvement Project: http://improve-usenet.org >> Need a new news feed? http://blinkynet.net/comp/newfeed.html > > This appears to be it. (or, at least, that's what it says and I copied it) > > Message-ID: > > My GG filter - as outlined at my Usenet Improvement Project - kills it. I had to temporarily disable my filters to see it. PLUS I had to go to a news feed that doesn't filter spam well to even see it that way; my normal feed does its own filtering (but not on GG posts), and some rule there killed it before it even got to me for my own filters to eat. > However, the website they want you to visit is luxury hyphen fashion dot > org with no spaces Irrelevant to GG filtering. > And the "From": line says it's from luxuryfashion underscore org at > yahoo dot cn with no spaces. Irrelevant to GG filtering. > I tried to block the "From" line but OE ignored it and I've already got > google groups blocked so I suspect something else but I am not sure what > I am looking at. I don't know. Must be something wrong with your implementation of the GG filter. Mine work/works. -- Blinky Killing all posts from Google Groups The Usenet Improvement Project: http://improve-usenet.org Need a new news feed? http://blinkynet.net/comp/newfeed.html |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Hoges in WA wrote: > Can you please answer a question? > If I have google groups things blocked like you educated us on a few months > back, how come this latest Chinese crap is getting through? I suspect it's > not really the same as the stuff that's been blocked but just looks like it. FWIW I use an ancient news reader which I like, and which provides a simple kill file mechanism. You create a kill rule by entering any string into a box. Then you select whether it is expected to appear in the subject or in the sender. When the rule is met, the post is killed. Using this, nearly all scheming Chinamen, google groups, and hateful posters simply do not appear. As a matter of housekeeping, I also pick off things like cancel posts and bleachbots. I also kf'd gmail, but noticed that a couple of RFC posters were missing, so recently I deleted the rule. Sure enough, I immediately received some kinda Nazi crap. As to the occasional unwanted post that escapes the filters and shows up, well, sometimes, things just don't work right. I check them out, maybe try to fashion a new rule for them, even if duplicative. Best regards . . . |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cuthbert Thistlethwaite wrote:
> > > Hoges in WA wrote: > >> Can you please answer a question? > >> If I have google groups things blocked like you educated us on a few months >> back, how come this latest Chinese crap is getting through? I suspect it's >> not really the same as the stuff that's been blocked but just looks like it. > > FWIW > > I use an ancient news reader which I like, and which provides a simple > kill file mechanism. You create a kill rule by entering any string into > a box. Then you select whether it is expected to appear in the subject > or in the sender. When the rule is met, the post is killed. Unfortunately, that's weak. There are other headers that is it useful to filter on. An example of such weak filtering capability is that offered by Thunderbird. > Using this, nearly all scheming Chinamen, google groups, and hateful I note "nearly" there, since with those two headers you can't filter Google Group spam. You're catching some of them with your minimal filtering, but that's incidental; you're not actually filtering Google Groups posts. -- Blinky Killing all posts from Google Groups The Usenet Improvement Project: http://improve-usenet.org Need a new news feed? http://blinkynet.net/comp/newfeed.html |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cuthbert Thistlethwaite wrote:
> > Hoges in WA wrote: > > > Can you please answer a question? > > > If I have google groups things blocked like you educated us on a few months > > back, how come this latest Chinese crap is getting through? I suspect it's > > not really the same as the stuff that's been blocked but just looks like it. > > FWIW > > I use an ancient news reader which I like, and which provides a simple > kill file mechanism. You create a kill rule by entering any string into > a box. Then you select whether it is expected to appear in the subject > or in the sender. When the rule is met, the post is killed. > > Using this, nearly all scheming Chinamen, google groups, and hateful > posters simply do not appear. As a matter of housekeeping, I also pick > off things like cancel posts and bleachbots. > > I also kf'd gmail, but noticed that a couple of RFC posters were > missing, so recently I deleted the rule. Sure enough, I immediately > received some kinda Nazi crap. > > As to the occasional unwanted post that escapes the filters and shows > up, well, sometimes, things just don't work right. I check them out, > maybe try to fashion a new rule for them, even if duplicative. > > Best regards . . . So, which newsreader do you use??? Some curious folks might want to know ;> Sky, who's a curious folk -- Ultra Ultimate Kitchen Rule - Use the Timer! Ultimate Kitchen Rule -- Cook's Choice |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sky wrote:
> Cuthbert Thistlethwaite wrote: >> >> Hoges in WA wrote: >> >> > Can you please answer a question? >> >> > If I have google groups things blocked like you educated us on a few >> > months back, how come this latest Chinese crap is getting through? I >> > suspect it's not really the same as the stuff that's been blocked but >> > just looks like it. >> >> FWIW >> >> I use an ancient news reader which I like, and which provides a simple >> kill file mechanism. You create a kill rule by entering any string >> into a box. Then you select whether it is expected to appear in the >> subject or in the sender. When the rule is met, the post is killed. >> >> Using this, nearly all scheming Chinamen, google groups, and hateful >> posters simply do not appear. As a matter of housekeeping, I also pick >> off things like cancel posts and bleachbots. >> >> I also kf'd gmail, but noticed that a couple of RFC posters were >> missing, so recently I deleted the rule. Sure enough, I immediately >> received some kinda Nazi crap. >> >> As to the occasional unwanted post that escapes the filters and shows >> up, well, sometimes, things just don't work right. I check them out, >> maybe try to fashion a new rule for them, even if duplicative. >> >> Best regards . . . > > So, which newsreader do you use??? Some curious folks might want to know > ;> Look at his headers. -- Blinky Killing all posts from Google Groups The Usenet Improvement Project: http://improve-usenet.org Need a new news feed? http://blinkynet.net/comp/newfeed.html |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Blinky the Shark" > wrote in message news ![]() > Hoges in WA wrote: > >> >> "Blinky the Shark" > wrote in message >> news ![]() >>> Hoges in WA wrote: >>> >>>> Can you please answer a question? >>>> >>>> If I have google groups things blocked like you educated us on a few >>>> months >>>> back, how come this latest Chinese crap is getting through? >>> >>> If you're using the correct filter, then what you see is not from Google >>> Groups. >>> >>> Give me the Message-ID number of an example. >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Blinky >>> Killing all posts from Google Groups >>> The Usenet Improvement Project: http://improve-usenet.org >>> Need a new news feed? http://blinkynet.net/comp/newfeed.html >> >> This appears to be it. (or, at least, that's what it says and I copied >> it) >> >> Message-ID: >> > > > My GG filter - as outlined at my Usenet Improvement Project - kills it. > > I had to temporarily disable my filters to see it. PLUS I had to go to a > news feed that doesn't filter spam well to even see it that way; my normal > feed does its own filtering (but not on GG posts), and some rule there > killed it before it even got to me for my own filters to eat. > >> However, the website they want you to visit is luxury hyphen fashion dot >> org with no spaces > > Irrelevant to GG filtering. > >> And the "From": line says it's from luxuryfashion underscore org at >> yahoo dot cn with no spaces. > > Irrelevant to GG filtering. > >> I tried to block the "From" line but OE ignored it and I've already got >> google groups blocked so I suspect something else but I am not sure what >> I am looking at. > > I don't know. Must be something wrong with your implementation of the GG > filter. Mine work/works. > > > -- > Blinky > Killing all posts from Google Groups > The Usenet Improvement Project: http://improve-usenet.org > Need a new news feed? http://blinkynet.net/comp/newfeed.html Thank you for your patience. Hoges in WA |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hoges in WA wrote:
> > "Blinky the Shark" > wrote in message > news ![]() >> Hoges in WA wrote: >> >>> >>> "Blinky the Shark" > wrote in message >>> news ![]() >>>> >>>>> Can you please answer a question? >>>>> >>>>> If I have google groups things blocked like you educated us on a few >>>>> months >>>>> back, how come this latest Chinese crap is getting through? >>>> >>>> If you're using the correct filter, then what you see is not from Google >>>> Groups. >>>> >>>> Give me the Message-ID number of an example. >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Blinky >>>> Killing all posts from Google Groups >>>> The Usenet Improvement Project: http://improve-usenet.org >>>> Need a new news feed? http://blinkynet.net/comp/newfeed.html >>> >>> This appears to be it. (or, at least, that's what it says and I copied >>> it) >>> >>> Message-ID: >>> > >> >> My GG filter - as outlined at my Usenet Improvement Project - kills it. >> >> I had to temporarily disable my filters to see it. PLUS I had to go to a >> news feed that doesn't filter spam well to even see it that way; my normal >> feed does its own filtering (but not on GG posts), and some rule there >> killed it before it even got to me for my own filters to eat. >> >>> However, the website they want you to visit is luxury hyphen fashion dot >>> org with no spaces >> >> Irrelevant to GG filtering. >> >>> And the "From": line says it's from luxuryfashion underscore org at >>> yahoo dot cn with no spaces. >> >> Irrelevant to GG filtering. >> >>> I tried to block the "From" line but OE ignored it and I've already got >>> google groups blocked so I suspect something else but I am not sure what >>> I am looking at. >> >> I don't know. Must be something wrong with your implementation of the GG >> filter. Mine work/works. >> >> >> -- >> Blinky >> Killing all posts from Google Groups >> The Usenet Improvement Project: http://improve-usenet.org >> Need a new news feed? http://blinkynet.net/comp/newfeed.html > > Thank you for your patience. No prob. Hope you get it fixed. -- Blinky Killing all posts from Google Groups The Usenet Improvement Project: http://improve-usenet.org Need a new news feed? http://blinkynet.net/comp/newfeed.html |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Sky wrote: > So, which newsreader do you use??? Some curious folks might want to know Netscape 4.61. It works fine but is obsolete and you probably can't get a copy. Occasionally I try something else but do not like it for one reason or another. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Blinky the Shark wrote: > Unfortunately, that's weak. Admittedly so. Yet, when I go to one of the offices I go to, where I have no news reader installed, and use Google to look at Usenet, I see tons of crap which I cannot see back here at home. I mean boatloads, including here in RFC. So my filters accomplish more than it seems. Nevertheless, I'll spend some time looking at your suggestions on your web site. TIA |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 02 Nov 2008 07:58:31 -0600, Cuthbert Thistlethwaite wrote:
> Blinky the Shark wrote: > >> Unfortunately, that's weak. > > Admittedly so. Yet, when I go to one of the offices I go to, where I > have no news reader installed, and use Google to look at Usenet, I see > tons of crap which I cannot see back here at home. I mean boatloads, > including here in RFC. So my filters accomplish more than it seems. > > Nevertheless, I'll spend some time looking at your suggestions on your > web site. > > TIA i'm surprised blinky hasn't suggested taking your question to the news.software.readers usenet group. (or maybe he did and i missed it, or maybe it's at the usenet improvement site.) friendly, knowledgeable people there. your pal, blake |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() blake murphy wrote: > i'm surprised blinky hasn't suggested taking your question to the > news.software.readers usenet group. (or maybe he did and i missed it, or > maybe it's at the usenet improvement site.) friendly, knowledgeable people > there. Actually, it's referenced on Blinky's site, and I'm gonna look at it later on, but thanks. Best regards . . . |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 02 Nov 2008 11:04:35 -0600, Cuthbert Thistlethwaite wrote:
> blake murphy wrote: > >> i'm surprised blinky hasn't suggested taking your question to the >> news.software.readers usenet group. (or maybe he did and i missed it, or >> maybe it's at the usenet improvement site.) friendly, knowledgeable people >> there. > > Actually, it's referenced on Blinky's site, and I'm gonna look at it > later on, but thanks. > > Best regards . . . ah, i thought that might be the case. blinky's very thorough. your pal, blake |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
PING: Blinky! | General Cooking | |||
Blinky may be gone..... | General Cooking | |||
Ping Blinky: I fixed the map. | General Cooking | |||
PING: Blinky | General Cooking | |||
PING: Blinky: Grub | General Cooking |