I needed some for a no-cook chocolate truffle recipe and could only
find one brand - at $3.99 for nine ounces! Any other choices?

Lenona.

On Sat, 8 Nov 2008 09:05:19 -0800 (PST), wrote:

>I needed some for a no-cook chocolate truffle recipe and could only
>find one brand - at $3.99 for nine ounces! Any other choices?
>
>Lenona.

The only name I am familiar with is Nabisco. A Google search for
chocolate wafers has some other names and options.

wrote:
> I needed some for a no-cook chocolate truffle recipe and could only
> find one brand - at $3.99 for nine ounces! Any other choices?
>
> Lenona.


Nabisco is the only brand I have ever seen (and I remember when they
were $.99/box.)

An alternative might be chocolate graham crackers or Oreos with the
"creme filling" scraped off. Or maybe even vanilla wafers with
cocoa or melted chocolate added....

gloria p

Gloria P wrote:
>
> wrote:
> > I needed some for a no-cook chocolate truffle recipe and could only
> > find one brand - at $3.99 for nine ounces! Any other choices?
> >
> > Lenona.
>
> Nabisco is the only brand I have ever seen (and I remember when they
> were $.99/box.)
>
> An alternative might be chocolate graham crackers or Oreos with the
> "creme filling" scraped off. Or maybe even vanilla wafers with
> cocoa or melted chocolate added....
>
> gloria p

I'm sure there are some recipes out there for chocolate wafers...

Pete C. wrote:
> Gloria P wrote:
>> wrote:
>>> I needed some for a no-cook chocolate truffle recipe and could only
>>> find one brand - at $3.99 for nine ounces! Any other choices?
>>>
>>> Lenona.
>> Nabisco is the only brand I have ever seen (and I remember when they
>> were $.99/box.)
>>
>> An alternative might be chocolate graham crackers or Oreos with the
>> "creme filling" scraped off. Or maybe even vanilla wafers with
>> cocoa or melted chocolate added....
>>
>> gloria p
>
> I'm sure there are some recipes out there for chocolate wafers...


Of course there are, but is it worth the extra step when the wafers will
be crumbled for use as an ingredient?

gloria p

On Sat, 08 Nov 2008 11:23:03 -0700, Gloria P >
wrote:

>Pete C. wrote:

>> I'm sure there are some recipes out there for chocolate wafers...
>
>
>Of course there are, but is it worth the extra step when the wafers will
>be crumbled for use as an ingredient?
>
>gloria p

If you are Kay Hartman, it was worth it. LOL.

Somewhere in the rfc archives is a recipe that Kay posted for a recipe
for chocolate wafer cookies. She used it for the same things that one
would use the Nabisco chocolate wafers.

I have the copy of this somewhere in my files..but I think it is
either something I printed out long ago, or have it on my laptop.

Christine

Pete C. wrote:

> > wrote:
> > > I needed some for a no-cook chocolate truffle recipe and could
> > > only find one brand - at $3.99 for nine ounces! Any other choices?

> I'm sure there are some recipes out there for chocolate wafers...

I'd say baking chocolate wafers to make a no-cook truffle was somewhat
counter-productive.




Brian

--
If televison's a babysitter, the Internet is a drunk librarian who
won't shut up.
-- Dorothy Gambrell (http://catandgirl.com)

Default User wrote:
> Pete C. wrote:
>
>>> wrote:
>>>> I needed some for a no-cook chocolate truffle recipe and could
>>>> only find one brand - at $3.99 for nine ounces! Any other choices?
>
>> I'm sure there are some recipes out there for chocolate wafers...
>
> I'd say baking chocolate wafers to make a no-cook truffle was somewhat
> counter-productive.
> Brian
>

Not sure what purpose the chocolate wafers would serve in a truffle
recipe. Just do a google search on Kay Hartman's truffles and leave
perfection alone. No wafers necessary.

On Nov 8, 1:36 pm, Goomba > wrote:

> Not sure what purpose the chocolate wafers would serve in a truffle
> recipe. Just do a google search on Kay Hartman's truffles and leave
> perfection alone. No wafers necessary.

Well, I was in a hurry, so the recipe I used was convenient. (I also
used a food processor.)

Besides the wafers, the other ingredients we

Almonds
Corn syrup
Marmalade
Cointreau

You then roll each truffle in powdered sugar and sprinkle grated
orange rind on top. (I had to settle for large decorative flakes of
rind, since when I tried to make it very fine, it just turned into wet
mush.)

Only trouble is, it said you're supposed to let them "ripen" in a cool
place for a week! But I suppose they'll taste good enough to the
recipient anyway.

Lenona.

On Sat 08 Nov 2008 10:05:19a, told us...

> I needed some for a no-cook chocolate truffle recipe and could only
> find one brand - at $3.99 for nine ounces! Any other choices?
>
> Lenona.

I doubt seriously if you could duplicate the Nabisco “Famous Chocolate
Wafers”, or if you could, whether it would be worth the trouble, especially
since you’re going to reduce them to crumbs for your recipe.

I’m not aware of any other cookie that’s quite the same as these. Even if
there were, they probably wouldn’t be much if any cheaper.

I can remember when these once cost 79¢ to 99¢ per package, but like
everything else, prices of foods have increased dramatically.

--
Wayne Boatwright
(correct the spelling of "geemail" to reply)

*******************************************
Date: Saturday, 11(XI)/08(VIII)/08(MMVIII)
*******************************************
Countdown till Veteran's Day
2dys 7hrs 58mins
*******************************************
It's hard to be serious when you're naked.
*******************************************

On Sat, 08 Nov 2008 23:05:59 GMT, Wayne Boatwright
> wrote:


>I doubt seriously if you could duplicate the Nabisco “Famous Chocolate
>Wafers”, or if you could, whether it would be worth the trouble, especially
>since you’re going to reduce them to crumbs for your recipe.

Kay Hartman did it.

I remember saving her recipe somewhere, because I was thinking it
might be nice to have it on hand, in case I couldn't find the Nabisco
cookies.

Christine

On Sat, 08 Nov 2008 23:05:59 GMT, Wayne Boatwright
> wrote:

>On Sat 08 Nov 2008 10:05:19a, told us...
>
>> I needed some for a no-cook chocolate truffle recipe and could only
>> find one brand - at $3.99 for nine ounces! Any other choices?
>>
>> Lenona.
>
>I doubt seriously if you could duplicate the Nabisco “Famous Chocolate
>Wafers”, or if you could, whether it would be worth the trouble, especially
>since you’re going to reduce them to crumbs for your recipe.
>

I found the recipe that Kay Hartman used...

Christine

CHOCOLATE WAFERS

Wonderful thin, crisp, plain cookies, the dough is rolled out and cut
with
a cookie cutter. The recipe can easily be doubled if you wish.

2 ounces (2 squares) unsweetened chocolate
1 cup plus 2 tablespoons sifted all-purpose flour
3/4 teaspoon double-acting baking powder
1/4 teaspoon baking soda
Pinch of salt
2 ounces (1/2 stick) sweet butter
1 teaspoon vanilla extract
1/2 cup granulated sugar
1 1/2 teaspoons light cream or milk
1 egg (graded large)

Place the chocolate in the top of a small double boiler over hot water
on
moderate heat. Cover until partially melted, then uncover and stir
until
smooth. Remove from the heat and set aside to cool slightly.

Sift together the flour, baking powder, baking soda, and salt and set
aside.

In the large bowl of an electric mixer cream the butter. Add the
vanilla
and sugar and beat to mix well. Add the melted chocolate and beat
until
incorporated. Then add the light cream or milk and the egg and beat
to mix

well. On low speed add the sifted dry ingredients, scraping the bowl
with
a rubber spatula and beating only until incorporated.

Place the dough on a piece of wax paper, fold the sides of the paper
over
the dough and press down on the paper to flatten the dough to a scant
1-inch thickness, wrap in the paper and refrigerate for 20 to 30
minutes --

no longer or the dough will crack when you roll it out. (However, if
you
do refrigerate it for longer -- even overnight -- let it stand at room
temperature for about an hour before rolling it out.)

Adjust two racks to divide oven into thirds and preheat oven to 400
degrees. Line cookie sheets with aluminum foil.

Flour a pastry cloth and place the dough on it. (If you have doubled
the
recipe, roll only half of the dough at a time.) With a floured
rolling pin

-- which should be re floured frequently to avoid sticking -- roll the
dough

out until it is only 1/8-inch thick (thin).

I use a round cookie cutter that is 2 3/4 inches in diameter -- use
any
size you like, and cut the cookies as close to each other as possible.

Place the cookies 1/2 inch apart on the aluminum foil. (It might be
necessary to transfer the cookies from the pastry cloth to the foil
with a
wide metal spatula -- handle them carefully in order to keep them
perfectly

round and flat.)

Leftover pieces of the dough should be pressed together and re rolled.

Bake two sheets at a time for 7 to 8 minutes, reversing the sheets top
to
bottom and front to back once to insure even taking. Bake until the
cookies feel almost firm to the touch. These are supposed to be crisp
(they will become more crisp as they cool) and they should not be
underbaked, but watch them carefully to be sure they do not burn. (If
you
bake one sheet at a time, bake it on the upper rack.)

With a wide metal spatula, transfer the cookies to racks to cool.
Store
airtight. Makes 36 2 3/4 inch cookies.

Christine Dabney wrote:
>
> On Sat, 08 Nov 2008 23:05:59 GMT, Wayne Boatwright
> > wrote:
>
> >On Sat 08 Nov 2008 10:05:19a, told us...
> >
> >> I needed some for a no-cook chocolate truffle recipe and could only
> >> find one brand - at $3.99 for nine ounces! Any other choices?
> >>
> >> Lenona.
> >
> >I doubt seriously if you could duplicate the Nabisco “Famous Chocolate
> >Wafers”, or if you could, whether it would be worth the trouble, especially
> >since you’re going to reduce them to crumbs for your recipe.



Do these come out like Oreo wafers? Love the wafers, hate the filling!



> >
>
> I found the recipe that Kay Hartman used...
>
> Christine
>
> CHOCOLATE WAFERS
>
> Wonderful thin, crisp, plain cookies, the dough is rolled out and cut
> with
> a cookie cutter. The recipe can easily be doubled if you wish.
>
> 2 ounces (2 squares) unsweetened chocolate
> 1 cup plus 2 tablespoons sifted all-purpose flour
> 3/4 teaspoon double-acting baking powder
> 1/4 teaspoon baking soda
> Pinch of salt
> 2 ounces (1/2 stick) sweet butter
> 1 teaspoon vanilla extract
> 1/2 cup granulated sugar
> 1 1/2 teaspoons light cream or milk
> 1 egg (graded large)
>
> Place the chocolate in the top of a small double boiler over hot water
> on
> moderate heat. Cover until partially melted, then uncover and stir
> until
> smooth. Remove from the heat and set aside to cool slightly.
>
> Sift together the flour, baking powder, baking soda, and salt and set
> aside.
>
> In the large bowl of an electric mixer cream the butter. Add the
> vanilla
> and sugar and beat to mix well. Add the melted chocolate and beat
> until
> incorporated. Then add the light cream or milk and the egg and beat
> to mix
>
> well. On low speed add the sifted dry ingredients, scraping the bowl
> with
> a rubber spatula and beating only until incorporated.
>
> Place the dough on a piece of wax paper, fold the sides of the paper
> over
> the dough and press down on the paper to flatten the dough to a scant
> 1-inch thickness, wrap in the paper and refrigerate for 20 to 30
> minutes --
>
> no longer or the dough will crack when you roll it out. (However, if
> you
> do refrigerate it for longer -- even overnight -- let it stand at room
> temperature for about an hour before rolling it out.)
>
> Adjust two racks to divide oven into thirds and preheat oven to 400
> degrees. Line cookie sheets with aluminum foil.
>
> Flour a pastry cloth and place the dough on it. (If you have doubled
> the
> recipe, roll only half of the dough at a time.) With a floured
> rolling pin
>
> -- which should be re floured frequently to avoid sticking -- roll the
> dough
>
> out until it is only 1/8-inch thick (thin).
>
> I use a round cookie cutter that is 2 3/4 inches in diameter -- use
> any
> size you like, and cut the cookies as close to each other as possible.
>
> Place the cookies 1/2 inch apart on the aluminum foil. (It might be
> necessary to transfer the cookies from the pastry cloth to the foil
> with a
> wide metal spatula -- handle them carefully in order to keep them
> perfectly
>
> round and flat.)
>
> Leftover pieces of the dough should be pressed together and re rolled.
>
> Bake two sheets at a time for 7 to 8 minutes, reversing the sheets top
> to
> bottom and front to back once to insure even taking. Bake until the
> cookies feel almost firm to the touch. These are supposed to be crisp
> (they will become more crisp as they cool) and they should not be
> underbaked, but watch them carefully to be sure they do not burn. (If
> you
> bake one sheet at a time, bake it on the upper rack.)
>
> With a wide metal spatula, transfer the cookies to racks to cool.
> Store
> airtight. Makes 36 2 3/4 inch cookies.

Newman's Own sells the cookies plain without the filling. I do think
they taste different than Oreo, but I like them better.

marcella


In article >, Arri London >
wrote:

>
> Do these come out like Oreo wafers? Love the wafers, hate the filling!
>

Marcella Peek wrote:
>
> Newman's Own sells the cookies plain without the filling. I do think
> they taste different than Oreo, but I like them better.
>
> marcella

TY. Will give it a go. It's the texture that's wanted. That crispness
that we haven't achieved so far in various 'Oreo-effect' wafers.



>
> In article >, Arri London >
> wrote:
>
> >
> > Do these come out like Oreo wafers? Love the wafers, hate the filling!
> >