blake murphy wrote:

>>>> Best regards . . .
>>> i *still* would like to see a survey on who is killfiled the most. i
>>> understand cathy's reluctance to mount one, though...
>>
>> It is pretty tacky and childish to brag about you is in your kill file.
>
> um, read it again. i'm not talking about *my* killfile, i'm interested in
> who is in *other's* killfiles.


It was not directed at you. It was directed at people who like to brag
about who they are filtering.

Dave Smith wrote:
> blake murphy wrote:
>
>>>>> Best regards . . .
>>>> i *still* would like to see a survey on who is killfiled the most. i
>>>> understand cathy's reluctance to mount one, though...
>>>
>>> It is pretty tacky and childish to brag about you is in your kill file.
>>
>> um, read it again. i'm not talking about *my* killfile, i'm
>> interested in
>> who is in *other's* killfiles.
>
>
> It was not directed at you. It was directed at people who like to brag
> about who they are filtering.


BTW..... that doesn't apply to people who talk about mention idiots who
nameshift.

Dave wrote:

>> half of a list of fifteen would all be morrow's.
>
> LMOA He is probably looking to set a record for the number of killfiles
> for one user under multiple name shifts. There always seems to be at least
> one twit in every group who is just looking for attention. It's not so
> bad being kill filed, but it's pretty pathetic to be filtered under dozens
> of names.

Greg always uses the same e-mail address, regardless of the name he chooses.
If I wanted to filter him -- which I don't -- I'd just delete anything with
"morrow" in the "From" line. The filtering mechanism in Outlook Express
applies the filter list to both the sender's name and his or her e-mail
address. I don't know if other newsreaders work like that.

Bob

On Sat, 06 Dec 2008 14:58:00 -0500, Dave Smith
> wrote:
>
>BTW..... that doesn't apply to people who talk about mention idiots who
>nameshift.

Maybe "Top 10 dirty rotten name shifters" would be a better survey.



--
I never worry about diets. The only carrots that
interest me are the number of carats in a diamond.

Mae West

"sf" > wrote in message
...
> On Sat, 06 Dec 2008 14:58:00 -0500, Dave Smith
> > wrote:
>>
>>BTW..... that doesn't apply to people who talk about mention idiots who
>>nameshift.
>
> Maybe "Top 10 dirty rotten name shifters" would be a better survey.
>
>
Yes but which names would you list?

On Sat, 6 Dec 2008 17:55:37 -0500, "cybercat" >
wrote:

>
>"sf" > wrote in message
.. .
>> On Sat, 06 Dec 2008 14:58:00 -0500, Dave Smith
>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>BTW..... that doesn't apply to people who talk about mention idiots who
>>>nameshift.
>>
>> Maybe "Top 10 dirty rotten name shifters" would be a better survey.
>>
>>
>Yes but which names would you list?
>
Who they are when they aren't name shifting, of course.


--
I never worry about diets. The only carrots that
interest me are the number of carats in a diamond.

Mae West

"sf" > wrote in message
...
> On Sat, 6 Dec 2008 17:55:37 -0500, "cybercat" >
> wrote:
>
>>
>>"sf" > wrote in message
. ..
>>> On Sat, 06 Dec 2008 14:58:00 -0500, Dave Smith
>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>BTW..... that doesn't apply to people who talk about mention idiots who
>>>>nameshift.
>>>
>>> Maybe "Top 10 dirty rotten name shifters" would be a better survey.
>>>
>>>
>>Yes but which names would you list?
>>
> Who they are when they aren't name shifting, of course.
>

If you know! In Greg's case you do--at least usually. There are nym shifters
then there are sneaky socks.

sf wrote:
> On Sat, 06 Dec 2008 14:58:00 -0500, Dave Smith
> > wrote:
>> BTW..... that doesn't apply to people who talk about mention idiots who
>> nameshift.
>
> Maybe "Top 10 dirty rotten name shifters" would be a better survey.

Make it a Top 10 and you get Morrow.

In article >,
"Bob Terwilliger" > wrote:

> Dave wrote:
>
> >> half of a list of fifteen would all be morrow's.
> >
> > LMOA He is probably looking to set a record for the number of killfiles
> > for one user under multiple name shifts. There always seems to be at least
> > one twit in every group who is just looking for attention. It's not so
> > bad being kill filed, but it's pretty pathetic to be filtered under dozens
> > of names.
>
> Greg always uses the same e-mail address, regardless of the name he chooses.

No, he sometimes changes *everything* possible in the "from" header.
His favorite trick is using domains from countries I've never heard of.

> If I wanted to filter him -- which I don't -- I'd just delete anything with
> "morrow" in the "From" line.

If you tried this technique, you would soon find that it doesn't always
work. What he *does* do is put his real name at the bottom of the post.
Since news clients only filter on headers, it is not possible to
killfile him regularly.

> The filtering mechanism in Outlook Express
> applies the filter list to both the sender's name and his or her e-mail
> address. I don't know if other newsreaders work like that.

I don't know if all newsreaders do this, but I use this technique
frequently.

--
Dan Abel
Petaluma, California USA

On Sat, 6 Dec 2008 14:19:07 -0800, Bob Terwilliger wrote:

> Dave wrote:
>
>>> half of a list of fifteen would all be morrow's.
>>
>> LMOA He is probably looking to set a record for the number of killfiles
>> for one user under multiple name shifts. There always seems to be at least
>> one twit in every group who is just looking for attention. It's not so
>> bad being kill filed, but it's pretty pathetic to be filtered under dozens
>> of names.
>
> Greg always uses the same e-mail address, regardless of the name he chooses.
> If I wanted to filter him -- which I don't -- I'd just delete anything with
> "morrow" in the "From" line. The filtering mechanism in Outlook Express
> applies the filter list to both the sender's name and his or her e-mail
> address. I don't know if other newsreaders work like that.
>
> Bob

that's true most of the time, but many 'one-button' killfiles just pick up
the name in quotes. it took me a while to catch on and start using the
e-mail address.

your pal,
blake

On Sat, 6 Dec 2008 19:39:09 +0100, Giusi wrote:

> "blake murphy"
>
>> um, read it again. i'm not talking about *my* killfile, i'm interested in
>> who is in *other's* killfiles.
>>
>> your pal,
>> blake
>
> None of your beeswax, besides if others tell you then you have made them
> brag about who is in it.

but a survey would give the aggregate numbers, not telling who was doing
what to whom.

your pal,
blake

On Sat, 06 Dec 2008 14:47:30 -0500, Dave Smith wrote:

> blake murphy wrote:
>
>>>>> Best regards . . .
>>>> i *still* would like to see a survey on who is killfiled the most. i
>>>> understand cathy's reluctance to mount one, though...
>>>
>>> It is pretty tacky and childish to brag about you is in your kill file.
>>
>> um, read it again. i'm not talking about *my* killfile, i'm interested in
>> who is in *other's* killfiles.
>
>
> It was not directed at you. It was directed at people who like to brag
> about who they are filtering.

o.k. i agree, it's kind of weird to announce it, though i have mentioned
it in passing in the past.

your pal,
blake

On Sat, 06 Dec 2008 14:52:21 -0800, sf wrote:

> On Sat, 06 Dec 2008 14:58:00 -0500, Dave Smith
> > wrote:
>>
>>BTW..... that doesn't apply to people who talk about mention idiots who
>>nameshift.
>
> Maybe "Top 10 dirty rotten name shifters" would be a better survey.

i don't think there are as many as ten, unless you count all of morrow's
names.

your pal,
blake

On Sat, 06 Dec 2008 18:29:13 GMT, blake murphy wrote:

> On Fri, 05 Dec 2008 22:17:40 +0200, ChattyCathy wrote:
>
>> blake murphy wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> i *still* would like to see a survey on who is killfiled the most. i
>>> understand cathy's reluctance to mount one, though...
>>
>>
>>
>> OK. If you're willing to submit a list of nicknames - right here on
>> r.f.c. (no private emails in this case) - with a limit of 15 nicknames,
>> I'll do it, but...<please read The Fine Print>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> The Fine Print:
>>
>> 1.0.1 blake gets to wear the flak jacket for this particular survey.
>>
>> 1.0.2 Limited to 15 names because I said so.
>>
>> 1.0.3 Take it or leave it.
>
> o.k., let me think about it.
>
> but if *i* compile the list, it would be kind of biased towards those i
> think objectionable (except i'd have to include myself, both out of egotism
> and to give the appearance of fairness).
>
> you could take nominations from this thread. or i could.
>
> your pal,
> blake

to piggyback on my own post (how gauche), here's a list of twenty. (before
anyone gets their knickers in a twist, i'm not saying these are people i
have kill-filed, or even that they deserve kill-filing, but that i remember
folks mentioning that *they* have k.f.-ed):

Gregory Morrow
Bob Terwilliger
Dave Smith
cybercat
Andy
Sheldon
"Pete C."
jmcquown
Paco
Goomba
"Paul M. Cook"
PeterL
sf
TFM®
Lou Decruss
ChattyCathy
Omelet
Sqwertz
blake murphy

i'm hoping you could vote for more than one.

your pal,
blake

blake murphy wrote:

> On Sat, 06 Dec 2008 18:29:13 GMT, blake murphy wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 05 Dec 2008 22:17:40 +0200, ChattyCathy wrote:
>>
>>> blake murphy wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> i *still* would like to see a survey on who is killfiled the most.
>>>> i understand cathy's reluctance to mount one, though...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> OK. If you're willing to submit a list of nicknames - right here on
>>> r.f.c. (no private emails in this case) - with a limit of 15
>>> nicknames, I'll do it, but...<please read The Fine Print>

>>> The Fine Print:
>>>
>>> 1.0.1 blake gets to wear the flak jacket for this particular survey.
>>>
>>> 1.0.2 Limited to 15 names because I said so.
>>>
>>> 1.0.3 Take it or leave it.
>>
>> o.k., let me think about it.
>>
>> but if *i* compile the list, it would be kind of biased towards those
>> i think objectionable (except i'd have to include myself, both out of
>> egotism and to give the appearance of fairness).
>>
>> you could take nominations from this thread. or i could.
>>
>> your pal,
>> blake
>
> to piggyback on my own post (how gauche), here's a list of twenty.
> (before anyone gets their knickers in a twist, i'm not saying these
> are people i have kill-filed, or even that they deserve kill-filing,
> but that i remember folks mentioning that *they* have k.f.-ed):
>
> Gregory Morrow
> Bob Terwilliger
> Dave Smith
> cybercat
> Andy
> Sheldon
> "Pete C."
> jmcquown
> Paco
> Goomba
> "Paul M. Cook"
> PeterL
> sf
> TFM®
> Lou Decruss
> ChattyCathy
> Omelet
> Sqwertz
> blake murphy
>
> i'm hoping you could vote for more than one.
>
> your pal,
> blake

You didn't read The Fine Print...

1.0.2 Limited to 15 names because I said so.
--
Cheers
Chatty Cathy

On 2008-12-07, blake murphy > wrote:

> to piggyback on my own post.....

Since you're compiling lists, howzabout a list of all the people who post
via google groups, so I can blanket ban GG with exceptions of the ppl I
like.

nb

Bob Terwilliger wrote:

> Dave wrote:
>
> >> half of a list of fifteen would all be morrow's.
> >
> > LMOA He is probably looking to set a record for the number of killfiles
> > for one user under multiple name shifts. There always seems to be at
least
> > one twit in every group who is just looking for attention. It's not so
> > bad being kill filed, but it's pretty pathetic to be filtered under
dozens
> > of names.
>
> Greg always uses the same e-mail address, regardless of the name he
chooses.
> If I wanted to filter him -- which I don't -- I'd just delete anything
with
> "morrow" in the "From" line. The filtering mechanism in Outlook Express
> applies the filter list to both the sender's name and his or her e-mail
> address. I don't know if other newsreaders work like that.
>


Yep...and all these big brave men crybabying about the fact that I've
spoofed cybercat and blake (I won't "spoof" blake again, can't promise about
the cyberkittie, hehe...) a few times.

If you put "Gregory Morrow" into your filters you'll catch more than 99% of
my posts...I *do* constantly munge my address, but that aint' my
problem...even Outlook Express has the capability to killfile me by name,
e.g. "Gregory Morrow". If folx can't figger that out that's not my prob...

And whenever I've spoofed those two above I've posted via google, my address
clearly shows as "gregorymorrowatearthlink.net". Put that address intro
your twitfile and you'll not even see those few posts...

If you want a *real* name -changing pest try Peterbreath Lucas, he has a new
nym and address most every day...that's cos he's an unctuous and smarmy PUKE
who thinks he can weasel his way into the good graces of rfc, but I can
guarantee that AIN'T gonna happen...

Sqwertz has a lotta sockpuppets and such, but I don't mind, he's part of the
rfc "gang"...anyways I always relish Steve and Sheldon going at it, which
they've done at least once already today. It's cheap
entertainment...Sheldon's critiques of Steve's food pix and then Steve's
rebuttals, lol.


--
Best
Greg

"Petals Fell On Petaluma Whilst Dan Abel wrote":

> In article >,
> "Bob Terwilliger" > wrote:
>
> > Dave wrote:
> >
> > >> half of a list of fifteen would all be morrow's.
> > >
> > > LMOA He is probably looking to set a record for the number of
killfiles
> > > for one user under multiple name shifts. There always seems to be at
least
> > > one twit in every group who is just looking for attention. It's not
so
> > > bad being kill filed, but it's pretty pathetic to be filtered under
dozens
> > > of names.
> >
> > Greg always uses the same e-mail address, regardless of the name he
chooses.
>
> No, he sometimes changes *everything* possible in the "from" header.
> His favorite trick is using domains from countries I've never heard of.
>


ALL those countries are REAL, Dan...

Quick, tell me what country 'ch' in my header signifies...first prize is a
Harry Partch record...!!!

:-)


> > If I wanted to filter him -- which I don't -- I'd just delete anything
with
> > "morrow" in the "From" line.
>
> If you tried this technique, you would soon find that it doesn't always
> work. What he *does* do is put his real name at the bottom of the post.
> Since news clients only filter on headers, it is not possible to
> killfile him regularly.


Sure it is, others do it ALL the time, Dan...maybe you need to read what I
wrote in response to Bob T. above...or consider getting a better newsreader.


> > The filtering mechanism in Outlook Express
> > applies the filter list to both the sender's name and his or her e-mail
> > address. I don't know if other newsreaders work like that.
>
> I don't know if all newsreaders do this, but I use this technique
> frequently.


In OE you can choose to filter solely by name...I do this all the time.

Peeps diss OE all the time, but filtering solely by name is a valuable
utility, I can't believe the "fancier" newsreader programs y'all use out
there won't permit this...


--
Best
Greg

" I find Greg Morrow lowbrow, witless, and obnoxious. For him to claim that
we are some
kind of comedy team turns my stomach."
- "cybercat" to me on rec.food.cooking

--
--
Best
Greg

" I find Greg Morrow lowbrow, witless, and obnoxious. For him to claim that
we are some
kind of comedy team turns my stomach."
- "cybercat" to me on rec.food.cooking

"blake murphy" > wrote in message
.. .
> On Sat, 06 Dec 2008 18:29:13 GMT, blake murphy wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 05 Dec 2008 22:17:40 +0200, ChattyCathy wrote:
> >
> >> blake murphy wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>> i *still* would like to see a survey on who is killfiled the most. i
> >>> understand cathy's reluctance to mount one, though...
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> OK. If you're willing to submit a list of nicknames - right here on
> >> r.f.c. (no private emails in this case) - with a limit of 15 nicknames,
> >> I'll do it, but...<please read The Fine Print>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> The Fine Print:
> >>
> >> 1.0.1 blake gets to wear the flak jacket for this particular survey.
> >>
> >> 1.0.2 Limited to 15 names because I said so.
> >>
> >> 1.0.3 Take it or leave it.
> >
> > o.k., let me think about it.
> >
> > but if *i* compile the list, it would be kind of biased towards those i
> > think objectionable (except i'd have to include myself, both out of
egotism
> > and to give the appearance of fairness).
> >
> > you could take nominations from this thread. or i could.
> >
> > your pal,
> > blake
>
> to piggyback on my own post (how gauche), here's a list of twenty.
(before
> anyone gets their knickers in a twist, i'm not saying these are people i
> have kill-filed, or even that they deserve kill-filing, but that i
remember
> folks mentioning that *they* have k.f.-ed):
>
> Gregory Morrow
> Bob Terwilliger
> Dave Smith
> cybercat
> Andy
> Sheldon
> "Pete C."
> jmcquown
> Paco
> Goomba
> "Paul M. Cook"
> PeterL
> sf
> TFM®
> Lou Decruss
> ChattyCathy
> Omelet
> Sqwertz
> blake murphy
>
> i'm hoping you could vote for more than one.
>
> your pal,
> blake

blake murphy wrote:

> On Sat, 06 Dec 2008 18:29:13 GMT, blake murphy wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 05 Dec 2008 22:17:40 +0200, ChattyCathy wrote:
> >
> >> blake murphy wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>> i *still* would like to see a survey on who is killfiled the most. i
> >>> understand cathy's reluctance to mount one, though...
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> OK. If you're willing to submit a list of nicknames - right here on
> >> r.f.c. (no private emails in this case) - with a limit of 15 nicknames,
> >> I'll do it, but...<please read The Fine Print>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> The Fine Print:
> >>
> >> 1.0.1 blake gets to wear the flak jacket for this particular survey.
> >>
> >> 1.0.2 Limited to 15 names because I said so.
> >>
> >> 1.0.3 Take it or leave it.
> >
> > o.k., let me think about it.
> >
> > but if *i* compile the list, it would be kind of biased towards those i
> > think objectionable (except i'd have to include myself, both out of
egotism
> > and to give the appearance of fairness).
> >
> > you could take nominations from this thread. or i could.
> >
> > your pal,
> > blake
>
> to piggyback on my own post (how gauche), here's a list of twenty.
(before
> anyone gets their knickers in a twist, i'm not saying these are people i
> have kill-filed, or even that they deserve kill-filing, but that i
remember
> folks mentioning that *they* have k.f.-ed):
>
> Gregory Morrow
> Bob Terwilliger
> Dave Smith
> cybercat
> Andy
> Sheldon
> "Pete C."
> jmcquown
> Paco
> Goomba
> "Paul M. Cook"
> PeterL
> sf
> TFM®
> Lou Decruss
> ChattyCathy
> Omelet
> Sqwertz
> blake murphy
>
> i'm hoping you could vote for more than one.


WOW, blake, wouldn't a party of all the those you listed be F-U-N...???

;-P


--
Best
Greg

" I find Greg Morrow lowbrow, witless, and obnoxious. For him to claim that
we are some
kind of comedy team turns my stomach."
- "cybercat" to me on rec.food.cooking

cybercat wrote:

> "sf" > wrote in message
> ...
> > On Sat, 6 Dec 2008 17:55:37 -0500, "cybercat" >
> > wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>"sf" > wrote in message
> . ..
> >>> On Sat, 06 Dec 2008 14:58:00 -0500, Dave Smith
> >>> > wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>BTW..... that doesn't apply to people who talk about mention idiots
who
> >>>>nameshift.
> >>>
> >>> Maybe "Top 10 dirty rotten name shifters" would be a better survey.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>Yes but which names would you list?
> >>
> > Who they are when they aren't name shifting, of course.
> >
>
> If you know! In Greg's case you do--at least usually.


Yup, *exactly*, cyberpussie...


There are nym shifters
> then there are sneaky socks.


I've got a sneaky "snake", it's coiled for "action"...wanna see it, li'l
gurl...???

;-p


--
Best
Greg

" I find Greg Morrow lowbrow, witless, and obnoxious. For him to claim that
we are some
kind of comedy team turns my stomach."
- "cybercat" to me on rec.food.cooking

Dave Smith wrote:

> sf wrote:
> > On Sat, 06 Dec 2008 14:58:00 -0500, Dave Smith
> > > wrote:
> >> BTW..... that doesn't apply to people who talk about mention idiots who
> >> nameshift.
> >
> > Maybe "Top 10 dirty rotten name shifters" would be a better survey.
>
> Make it a Top 10 and you get Morrow.


<blush>

I'm always willing to uphold the highest standards of dignity, Dave...

;-)


--
Best
Greg

" I find Greg Morrow lowbrow, witless, and obnoxious. For him to claim that
we are some
kind of comedy team turns my stomach."
- "cybercat" to me on rec.food.cooking

"Gregory Morrow" > wrote in message
...
>
> Bob Terwilliger wrote:
>
>> Dave wrote:
>>
>> >> half of a list of fifteen would all be morrow's.
>> >
>> > LMOA He is probably looking to set a record for the number of killfiles
>> > for one user under multiple name shifts. There always seems to be at
> least
>> > one twit in every group who is just looking for attention. It's not so
>> > bad being kill filed, but it's pretty pathetic to be filtered under
> dozens
>> > of names.
>>
>> Greg always uses the same e-mail address, regardless of the name he
> chooses.
>> If I wanted to filter him -- which I don't -- I'd just delete anything
> with
>> "morrow" in the "From" line. The filtering mechanism in Outlook Express
>> applies the filter list to both the sender's name and his or her e-mail
>> address. I don't know if other newsreaders work like that.
>>
>
>
> Yep...and all these big brave men crybabying about the fact that I've
> spoofed cybercat and blake (I won't "spoof" blake again, can't promise
> about
> the cyberkittie, hehe...) a few times.
>
> If you put "Gregory Morrow" into your filters you'll catch more than 99%
> of
> my posts...I *do* constantly munge my address, but that aint' my
> problem...even Outlook Express has the capability to killfile me by name,
> e.g. "Gregory Morrow". If folx can't figger that out that's not my
> prob...
>
> And whenever I've spoofed those two above I've posted via google, my
> address
> clearly shows as "gregorymorrowatearthlink.net". Put that address intro
> your twitfile and you'll not even see those few posts...
>
> If you want a *real* name -changing pest try Peterbreath Lucas, he has a
> new
> nym and address most every day...that's cos he's an unctuous and smarmy
> PUKE
> who thinks he can weasel his way into the good graces of rfc, but I can
> guarantee that AIN'T gonna happen...
>
> Sqwertz has a lotta sockpuppets and such, but I don't mind, he's part of
> the
> rfc "gang"...anyways I always relish Steve and Sheldon going at it, which
> they've done at least once already today. It's cheap
> entertainment...Sheldon's critiques of Steve's food pix and then Steve's
> rebuttals, lol.

Your remarkable ability to judge ones character correctly truly amazes me.

your warm-heartedness complimentses
from Jasper

On Sun, 7 Dec 2008 14:41:00 -0600, "Gregory Morrow" >
wrote:
>
>WOW, blake, wouldn't a party of all the those you listed be F-U-N...???

He listed regular rfc posters that have been publicly plonked.

<cough>

At least the people on the list have something to say, so that party
would be lively - to say the very least. LOLOL!


--
I never worry about diets. The only carrots that
interest me are the number of carats in a diamond.

Mae West

On Sun, 7 Dec 2008 14:28:25 -0600, "Gregory Morrow"
> wrote:

>If you put "Gregory Morrow" into your filters you'll catch more than 99% of
>my posts...I *do* constantly munge my address, but that aint' my
>problem...even Outlook Express has the capability to killfile me by name,
>e.g. "Gregory Morrow". If folx can't figger that out that's not my prob...

Obviously, you've been out of my KF for quite a while... but I want to
KF you when you spoof. Soooooo, how would I do that? Inquiring minds
want to know (I'm sure I'm not the only one).


--
I never worry about diets. The only carrots that
interest me are the number of carats in a diamond.

Mae West

On Sun, 7 Dec 2008 14:28:25 -0600, "Gregory Morrow"
> wrote:

>And whenever I've spoofed those two above I've posted via google, my address
>clearly shows as "gregorymorrowatearthlink.net". Put that address intro
>your twitfile and you'll not even see those few posts...

Again, I should have read the ENTIRE post before replying. Open
mouth, insert foot. Sorry.


--
I never worry about diets. The only carrots that
interest me are the number of carats in a diamond.

Mae West

On Sun, 7 Dec 2008 14:45:41 -0600, "Gregory Morrow" >
wrote:
>
><blush>
>
>I'm always willing to uphold the highest standards of dignity, Dave...
>
>;-)

ROTFLMAO!!!


--
I never worry about diets. The only carrots that
interest me are the number of carats in a diamond.

Mae West

sf wrote:

> On Sun, 7 Dec 2008 14:28:25 -0600, "Gregory Morrow"
> > wrote:
>
> >If you put "Gregory Morrow" into your filters you'll catch more than 99%
of
> >my posts...I *do* constantly munge my address, but that aint' my
> >problem...even Outlook Express has the capability to killfile me by name,
> >e.g. "Gregory Morrow". If folx can't figger that out that's not my
prob...
>
> Obviously, you've been out of my KF for quite a while... but I want to
> KF you when you spoof. Soooooo, how would I do that? Inquiring minds
> want to know (I'm sure I'm not the only one).


I don't know, I only know OE...but in this particular case kill "cybercat"
along with the email address "gregorymorrowatearthlink.net"...


--
Best
Greg

On Sun, 7 Dec 2008 18:27:04 -0600, "Gregory Morrow" >
wrote:
>
>I don't know, I only know OE...but in this particular case kill "cybercat"
>along with the email address "gregorymorrowatearthlink.net"...

Please read the following apology.


--
I never worry about diets. The only carrots that
interest me are the number of carats in a diamond.

Mae West

sf wrote:

> On Sun, 7 Dec 2008 14:41:00 -0600, "Gregory Morrow" >
> wrote:
> >
> >WOW, blake, wouldn't a party of all the those you listed be F-U-N...???
>
> He listed regular rfc posters that have been publicly plonked.
>
> <cough>
>
> At least the people on the list have something to say, so that party
> would be lively - to say the very least. LOLOL!


Seriously, I think we'd all get along...however I'd hope that Peterbreath
Lucas' plane gets "lost" along the way to the party...

Speaking of "lost planes", before the jet era and modern radar tracking c.
1960 airliners on long - distance flights would often simply "disappear", up
until then planes were pretty much only in radio contact, there was little
radar tracking. Planes would crash even over land and the only way the FAA
would know would be by peeps and local authorities calling in that there had
been a crash. It would take hours or sometimes even days to locate the
crash sites...there were no "black boxes" with radio beacons as is routine
now.

Trans - oceanic flights would take off and then they'd reach something
called "the point of no return", beyond which the primitive radar tracking
of the time would be of no use...the planes would only have radio
communications with their home bases and local ATC, every long - distance
plane had a radio operater, plus a navigator plus the pilot and co - pilot.
Planes disappeared all the time, there were many famous incidents especially
in the Pacific, c. 1958 a Pan Am piston Stratocruiser on the Hawaii - SFO
run simply disappeared, later some wreckage was found. One famous crash
happened c. 1957 over the Grand Canyon, a TWA Constellation and a United
DC - 7 fatally collided, it took quite some time to find it. Another famous
mid - air crash - witnessed by many, natch - was over Brooklyn in IIRC
1960, a United DC-8 jet and a TWA Constellation crashed on approach to
Idlewild (JFK), much loss of life, some on the ground. Something like that
is unimaginable now...

Even when transatlantic jets were introduced in late 1958, ATC on that route
was still dodgy...by then some of the brighter minds figgered out that the
US - Canadian - NATO DEW line radars could be used to not only track
incoming Russkie missiles and bombers, but also civilian airliners...

Now we have GPS and sat nav and all that stuff, every moment of every
airliner movement is tracked, you can see this on any home PC. The
introduction of jets was also a revolution in safety, those old propeller
piston airliners had mucho numerous parts that if any one was even a tidge
off could be fatal...watch _The High And The Mighty_, that stewardess was
not kidding that they were in trouble when she sensed a tiny vibration in
the cabin floor...

Anyways, that's the civil aviation history lesson for today, kidz...

;-)


--
Best
Greg

"blake murphy"
> i'm hoping you could vote for more than one.
>
> your pal,
> blake

I am not touching it with a ten foot pole. This group is mad enough without
more divisive fighting.

On Sun, 07 Dec 2008 16:08:46 GMT, blake murphy
> wrote:

>to piggyback on my own post (how gauche), here's a list of twenty. (before
>anyone gets their knickers in a twist, i'm not saying these are people i
>have kill-filed, or even that they deserve kill-filing, but that i remember
>folks mentioning that *they* have k.f.-ed):
>
>Gregory Morrow
>Bob Terwilliger
>Dave Smith
>cybercat
>Andy
>Sheldon
>"Pete C."
>jmcquown
>Paco
>Goomba
>"Paul M. Cook"
>PeterL
>sf
>TFM®
>Lou Decruss
>ChattyCathy
>Omelet
>Sqwertz
>blake murphy
>
>i'm hoping you could vote for more than one.

I'm always happy to make any lists. Thanks!

Lou

On Sun, 07 Dec 2008 18:04:38 GMT, notbob wrote:

> On 2008-12-07, blake murphy > wrote:
>
>> to piggyback on my own post.....
>
> Since you're compiling lists, howzabout a list of all the people who post
> via google groups, so I can blanket ban GG with exceptions of the ppl I
> like.
>
> nb

i have such a list, but it's a few months out of date, and i'm also in the
process of moving to a new computer. e-mail at pretty much the address
above and i'll send it to you.

your pal,
blake

On Sun, 7 Dec 2008 14:41:00 -0600, Gregory Morrow wrote:

> blake murphy wrote:

>> to piggyback on my own post (how gauche), here's a list of twenty.
> (before
>> anyone gets their knickers in a twist, i'm not saying these are people i
>> have kill-filed, or even that they deserve kill-filing, but that i
> remember
>> folks mentioning that *they* have k.f.-ed):
>>
<list snipped>
>>
>> i'm hoping you could vote for more than one.
>
>
> WOW, blake, wouldn't a party of all the those you listed be F-U-N...???
>
> ;-P

possibly more fun than reading the posts.

blake

"Giusi" > wrote in message
...
> "blake murphy"
>> i'm hoping you could vote for more than one.
>>
>> your pal,
>> blake
>
> I am not touching it with a ten foot pole. This group is mad enough
> without more divisive fighting.
You mean mad "crazy" or mad "angry?"

On Sun, 07 Dec 2008 19:46:44 +0200, ChattyCathy wrote:

> blake murphy wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 06 Dec 2008 18:29:13 GMT, blake murphy wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, 05 Dec 2008 22:17:40 +0200, ChattyCathy wrote:
>>>
>>>> blake murphy wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> i *still* would like to see a survey on who is killfiled the most.
>>>>> i understand cathy's reluctance to mount one, though...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> OK. If you're willing to submit a list of nicknames - right here on
>>>> r.f.c. (no private emails in this case) - with a limit of 15
>>>> nicknames, I'll do it, but...<please read The Fine Print>
>
>>>> The Fine Print:
>>>>
>>>> 1.0.1 blake gets to wear the flak jacket for this particular survey.
>>>>
>>>> 1.0.2 Limited to 15 names because I said so.
>>>>
>>>> 1.0.3 Take it or leave it.
>>>
>>> o.k., let me think about it.
>>>
>>> but if *i* compile the list, it would be kind of biased towards those
>>> i think objectionable (except i'd have to include myself, both out of
>>> egotism and to give the appearance of fairness).
>>>
>>> you could take nominations from this thread. or i could.
>>>
>>> your pal,
>>> blake
>>
>> to piggyback on my own post (how gauche), here's a list of twenty.
>> (before anyone gets their knickers in a twist, i'm not saying these
>> are people i have kill-filed, or even that they deserve kill-filing,
>> but that i remember folks mentioning that *they* have k.f.-ed):
>>
>> Gregory Morrow
>> Bob Terwilliger
>> Dave Smith
>> cybercat
>> Andy
>> Sheldon
>> "Pete C."
>> jmcquown
>> Paco
>> Goomba
>> "Paul M. Cook"
>> PeterL
>> sf
>> TFM®
>> Lou Decruss
>> ChattyCathy
>> Omelet
>> Sqwertz
>> blake murphy
>>
>> i'm hoping you could vote for more than one.
>>
>> your pal,
>> blake
>
> You didn't read The Fine Print...
>
> 1.0.2 Limited to 15 names because I said so.

well, you could pare the list to fifteen or i could.

your pal,
blake

Lou Decruss wrote:

> On Sun, 07 Dec 2008 16:08:46 GMT, blake murphy
> > wrote:
>
> >to piggyback on my own post (how gauche), here's a list of twenty.
(before
> >anyone gets their knickers in a twist, i'm not saying these are people i
> >have kill-filed, or even that they deserve kill-filing, but that i
remember
> >folks mentioning that *they* have k.f.-ed):
> >
> >Gregory Morrow
> >Bob Terwilliger
> >Dave Smith
> >cybercat
> >Andy
> >Sheldon
> >"Pete C."
> >jmcquown
> >Paco
> >Goomba
> >"Paul M. Cook"
> >PeterL
> >sf
> >TFM®
> >Lou Decruss
> >ChattyCathy
> >Omelet
> >Sqwertz
> >blake murphy
> >
> >i'm hoping you could vote for more than one.
>
> I'm always happy to make any lists. Thanks!


Yup, my sentiments *exactly*...!!!

;-)


--
Best
Greg

" I find Greg Morrow lowbrow, witless, and obnoxious. For him to claim that
we are some
kind of comedy team turns my stomach."
- "cybercat" to me on rec.food.cooking

blake murphy wrote:

> On Sun, 07 Dec 2008 19:46:44 +0200, ChattyCathy wrote:
>
> > blake murphy wrote:
> >
> >> On Sat, 06 Dec 2008 18:29:13 GMT, blake murphy wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Fri, 05 Dec 2008 22:17:40 +0200, ChattyCathy wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> blake murphy wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> i *still* would like to see a survey on who is killfiled the most.
> >>>>> i understand cathy's reluctance to mount one, though...
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> OK. If you're willing to submit a list of nicknames - right here on
> >>>> r.f.c. (no private emails in this case) - with a limit of 15
> >>>> nicknames, I'll do it, but...<please read The Fine Print>
> >
> >>>> The Fine Print:
> >>>>
> >>>> 1.0.1 blake gets to wear the flak jacket for this particular survey.
> >>>>
> >>>> 1.0.2 Limited to 15 names because I said so.
> >>>>
> >>>> 1.0.3 Take it or leave it.
> >>>
> >>> o.k., let me think about it.
> >>>
> >>> but if *i* compile the list, it would be kind of biased towards those
> >>> i think objectionable (except i'd have to include myself, both out of
> >>> egotism and to give the appearance of fairness).
> >>>
> >>> you could take nominations from this thread. or i could.
> >>>
> >>> your pal,
> >>> blake
> >>
> >> to piggyback on my own post (how gauche), here's a list of twenty.
> >> (before anyone gets their knickers in a twist, i'm not saying these
> >> are people i have kill-filed, or even that they deserve kill-filing,
> >> but that i remember folks mentioning that *they* have k.f.-ed):
> >>
> >> Gregory Morrow
> >> Bob Terwilliger
> >> Dave Smith
> >> cybercat
> >> Andy
> >> Sheldon
> >> "Pete C."
> >> jmcquown
> >> Paco
> >> Goomba
> >> "Paul M. Cook"
> >> PeterL
> >> sf
> >> TFM®
> >> Lou Decruss
> >> ChattyCathy
> >> Omelet
> >> Sqwertz
> >> blake murphy
> >>
> >> i'm hoping you could vote for more than one.
> >>
> >> your pal,
> >> blake
> >
> > You didn't read The Fine Print...
> >
> > 1.0.2 Limited to 15 names because I said so.
>
> well, you could pare the list to fifteen or i could.


Don't you DARE take ME offa the list or I'll take the Red Line up to Silver
Spring and give you a big NOOGIE, blake...


--
Best
Greg

" I find Greg Morrow lowbrow, witless, and obnoxious. For him to claim that
we are some
kind of comedy team turns my stomach."
- "cybercat" to me on rec.food.cooking

On Mon, 08 Dec 2008 11:11:01 -0600, Lou Decruss wrote:

> On Sun, 07 Dec 2008 16:08:46 GMT, blake murphy
> > wrote:
>
>>to piggyback on my own post (how gauche), here's a list of twenty. (before
>>anyone gets their knickers in a twist, i'm not saying these are people i
>>have kill-filed, or even that they deserve kill-filing, but that i remember
>>folks mentioning that *they* have k.f.-ed):
>>
>>Gregory Morrow
>>Bob Terwilliger
>>Dave Smith
>>cybercat
>>Andy
>>Sheldon
>>"Pete C."
>>jmcquown
>>Paco
>>Goomba
>>"Paul M. Cook"
>>PeterL
>>sf
>>TFM®
>>Lou Decruss
>>ChattyCathy
>>Omelet
>>Sqwertz
>>blake murphy
>>
>>i'm hoping you could vote for more than one.
>
> I'm always happy to make any lists. Thanks!
>
> Lou

i wouldn't dream of kilfiling you, lou, but i do seem to remember someone
else threatened to.

your pal,
blake

On Tue 09 Dec 2008 12:13:08p, blake murphy told us...

> On Mon, 08 Dec 2008 11:11:01 -0600, Lou Decruss wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 07 Dec 2008 16:08:46 GMT, blake murphy
>> > wrote:
>>
>>>to piggyback on my own post (how gauche), here's a list of twenty.
>>>(before anyone gets their knickers in a twist, i'm not saying these are
>>>people i have kill-filed, or even that they deserve kill-filing, but
>>>that i remember folks mentioning that *they* have k.f.-ed):
>>>
>>>Gregory Morrow
>>>Bob Terwilliger
>>>Dave Smith
>>>cybercat
>>>Andy
>>>Sheldon
>>>"Pete C."
>>>jmcquown
>>>Paco
>>>Goomba
>>>"Paul M. Cook"
>>>PeterL
>>>sf
>>>TFM®
>
>> Wayne Boatwright
>> (correct the spelling of "geemail" to reply)
>> ************************************************** **********************
>> Date: Monday, 12(XII)/08(VIII)/08(MMVIII)
>> ************************************************** **********************
>> Countdown till Christmas Day
>> 2wks 2dys 3hrs 31mins
>> ************************************************** **********************
>> I'd love to, but none of my socks match.
>> ************************************************** **********************
>>
>
>
>
> i wouldn't dream of kilfiling you, lou, but i do seem to remember
> someone else threatened to.
>
> your pal,
> blake
>

There's no telling how many kill files I'm probably in. Not that it really
matters.

--
Wayne Boatwright
(correct the spelling of "geemail" to reply)
************************************************** **********************
Date: Tuesday, 12(XII)/09(IX)/08(MMVIII)
************************************************** **********************
Countdown till Christmas Day
2wks 1dys 11hrs 43mins
************************************************** **********************
Today is a fine day to have a lousy day.
************************************************** **********************