Why pick on me?

--
Peter Lucas
Brisbane
Australia

You will travel through the valley of rejection;
you will reside in the land of morning mists...and you will find your
home,
though it will not be where you left it.

On Sat, 20 Dec 2008 14:36:48 -0800 (PST), Peter Lucas
> wrote:

>Why pick on me?

Geeze, Louise! The forger strikes again. This is getting REALLY old.
Isn't there a playground somewhere, where you could pick a fight with
a little kid?

Damsel in dis Dress > wrote in
:

> On Sat, 20 Dec 2008 14:36:48 -0800 (PST), Peter Lucas
> > wrote:
>
>>Why pick on me?
>
> Geeze, Louise! The forger strikes again. This is getting REALLY old.
> Isn't there a playground somewhere, where you could pick a fight with
> a little kid?
>



It did that, and the little kid beat it up.


I'll be glad when the Internet/Usenet is monitored/moderated entirely. Then
immature, mentally retarded, little ****ants like kirkland won't be able to
carry on like they do.



--
Peter Lucas
Brisbane
Australia

You will travel through the valley of rejection;
you will reside in the land of morning mists...and you will find your home,
though it will not be where you left it.

Damsel in dis Dress wrote:
>
> On Sat, 20 Dec 2008 14:36:48 -0800 (PST), Peter Lucas
> > wrote:
>
> >Why pick on me?
>
> Geeze, Louise! The forger strikes again. This is getting REALLY old.
> Isn't there a playground somewhere, where you could pick a fight with
> a little kid?

Peter exposed Kirkland as a liar and a coward.
Apparently, now Peter gets the "Chung" treatment,
except using a blizzard of fake names, unlike
Chung who at least posted under his own name.

I suppose we'll have to wait for Peter to die
before Kirkland stops his smear campaign.

Mark Thorson > wrote in news:494D76C1.566409B0
@sonic.net:

> Damsel in dis Dress wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, 20 Dec 2008 14:36:48 -0800 (PST), Peter Lucas
>> > wrote:
>>
>> >Why pick on me?
>>
>> Geeze, Louise! The forger strikes again. This is getting REALLY
old.
>> Isn't there a playground somewhere, where you could pick a fight with
>> a little kid?
>
> Peter exposed Kirkland as a liar and a coward.
> Apparently, now Peter gets the "Chung" treatment,
> except using a blizzard of fake names, unlike
> Chung who at least posted under his own name.


I never had the (dis) pleasure of seeing/hearing about this "Chung".
Unless I saw it and killfiled it straight-away.

>
> I suppose we'll have to wait for Peter to die
> before Kirkland stops his smear campaign.
>


And *that's* not going to happen (me dying) anytime soon!!

kirkland will die soon. It's a chronic alcoholic, unemployed, alone, and
divorced. Percentages are *definitely* in favour of it dying soon.

--
Peter Lucas
Brisbane
Australia

You will travel through the valley of rejection;
you will reside in the land of morning mists...and you will find your
home,
though it will not be where you left it.

On Sat, 20 Dec 2008 14:50:41 -0800, Mark Thorson >
wrote:

>Damsel in dis Dress wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, 20 Dec 2008 14:36:48 -0800 (PST), Peter Lucas
>> > wrote:
>>
>> >Why pick on me?
>>
>> Geeze, Louise! The forger strikes again. This is getting REALLY old.
>> Isn't there a playground somewhere, where you could pick a fight with
>> a little kid?
>
>Peter exposed Kirkland as a liar and a coward.
>Apparently, now Peter gets the "Chung" treatment,
>except using a blizzard of fake names, unlike
>Chung who at least posted under his own name.
>
>I suppose we'll have to wait for Peter to die
>before Kirkland stops his smear campaign.

That seems like an extreme solution.

Carol

On Dec 21, 10:02*am, Peter Lucas > wrote:
> Mark Thorson > wrote in news:494D76C1.566409B0
> @sonic.net:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Damsel in dis Dress wrote:
>
> >> On Sat, 20 Dec 2008 14:36:48 -0800 (PST), Peter Lucas
> >> > wrote:
>
> >> >Why pick on me?
>
> >> Geeze, Louise! *The forger strikes again. *This is getting REALLY
> old.
> >> Isn't there a playground somewhere, where you could pick a fight with
> >> a little kid?
>
> > Peter exposed Kirkland as a liar and a coward.
> > Apparently, now Peter gets the "Chung" treatment,
> > except using a blizzard of fake names, unlike
> > Chung who at least posted under his own name.
>
> I never had the (dis) pleasure of seeing/hearing about this "Chung".
> Unless I saw it and killfiled it straight-away.
>
>
>
> > I suppose we'll have to wait for Peter to die
> > before Kirkland stops his smear campaign.
>
> And *that's* not going to happen (me dying) anytime soon!!
>
> kirkland will die soon. It's a chronic alcoholic, unemployed, alone, and
> divorced. Percentages are *definitely* in favour of it dying soon.

Not me then Lucas for:
I am not an alcoholic,
I am fully employed,
I live with my partner who is employed,
I am in good health.
want proof, next time you are in Melbourne drop round and see me.

Bevan Kirkland

"Peter Lucas" > wrote in message
.25...

> I'll be glad when the Internet/Usenet is monitored/moderated entirely.
> Then
> immature, mentally retarded, little ****ants like kirkland won't be able
> to
> carry on like they do.

I won't be. If my freedom of speech is ever taken away, it will be a sad
day. If you don't like what others say, ignore it.

In article > ,
Peter Lucas > wrote:

> Mark Thorson > wrote in news:494D76C1.566409B0
> @sonic.net:
>
> > Damsel in dis Dress wrote:
> >>
> >> On Sat, 20 Dec 2008 14:36:48 -0800 (PST), Peter Lucas
> >> > wrote:
> >>
> >> >Why pick on me?
> >>
> >> Geeze, Louise! The forger strikes again. This is getting REALLY
> old.
> >> Isn't there a playground somewhere, where you could pick a fight with
> >> a little kid?
> >
> > Peter exposed Kirkland as a liar and a coward.
> > Apparently, now Peter gets the "Chung" treatment,
> > except using a blizzard of fake names, unlike
> > Chung who at least posted under his own name.

Except he changed it every week!

> I never had the (dis) pleasure of seeing/hearing about this "Chung".
> Unless I saw it and killfiled it straight-away.

He stopped posting here once the person he was bugging died.

> > I suppose we'll have to wait for Peter to die
> > before Kirkland stops his smear campaign.
> >
> And *that's* not going to happen (me dying) anytime soon!!
>
> kirkland will die soon. It's a chronic alcoholic, unemployed, alone, and
> divorced. Percentages are *definitely* in favour of it dying soon.

--
Dan Abel
Petaluma, California USA

"Peter Lucas" > wrote in message
...
> Why pick on me?

Ooh wah, ooh wah
Ooh wah, ooh wah
Ooh wah, ooh wah
Why do fools fall in love?

Why do birds sing so ***
And lovers await the break of the day
Why do they fall in love?
Why does the rain fall from up above?
Why do fools fall in love?
Why do they fall in love?

Love is a losing game
Love can be a shame
I know, Im a fool you see
For that fool is me
Tell me why
Tell me why

Why do birds sing so ***
And lovers await the break of the day
Why do they fall in love?
Why does the rain fall from up above?
Why do fools fall in love?
Why do they fall in love?

Why does my heart
Skip a crazy beat?
For I know
It will reach defeat
Tell me why
Tell me why

Why do fools fall in love?
Tell me why
Tell me why

The Real Peter Lucas wrote:
>
> Mark Thorson > wrote in news:494D76C1.566409B0
> @sonic.net:
>
> > I suppose we'll have to wait for Peter to die
> > before Kirkland stops his smear campaign.
>
> And *that's* not going to happen (me dying) anytime soon!!
>
> kirkland will die soon. It's a chronic alcoholic, unemployed, alone, and
> divorced. Percentages are *definitely* in favour of it dying soon.

That works, too.

Damsel in dis Dress > wrote:

> On Sat, 20 Dec 2008 14:36:48 -0800 (PST), Peter Lucas
> > wrote:
>
>>Why pick on me?
>
> Geeze, Louise! The forger strikes again.

We really don't need everyone pointing out forgeries or not. I
rather enjoy the forgeries much more than the real Peter anyway.
Just let Peter go down in a huge ball of flames by himself. Nobody
needs to defend him.

-sw

On Sat, 20 Dec 2008 18:29:39 -0500, "Cheryl"
> wrote:

>"Peter Lucas" > wrote in message
0.25...
>
>> I'll be glad when the Internet/Usenet is monitored/moderated entirely.
>> Then
>> immature, mentally retarded, little ****ants like kirkland won't be able
>> to
>> carry on like they do.
>
>I won't be. If my freedom of speech is ever taken away, it will be a sad
>day. If you don't like what others say, ignore it.

I still prefer an unmoderated rfc. There are lots of moderated groups
on usenet and the intenet. Anyone with half a brain can find them.


--
I never worry about diets. The only carrots that
interest me are the number of carats in a diamond.

Mae West

Sqwertz wrote:
> Damsel in dis Dress > wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 20 Dec 2008 14:36:48 -0800 (PST), Peter Lucas
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> Why pick on me?
>> Geeze, Louise! The forger strikes again.
>
> We really don't need everyone pointing out forgeries or not. I
> rather enjoy the forgeries much more than the real Peter anyway.
> Just let Peter go down in a huge ball of flames by himself. Nobody
> needs to defend him.
>
> -sw

I actually appreciate Carol's pointing them out. I think that,
collectively, it saves us a lot of time.

--
Jean B.

On Sat, 20 Dec 2008 20:05:24 -0500, "Jean B." > wrote:

>Sqwertz wrote:
>> Damsel in dis Dress > wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, 20 Dec 2008 14:36:48 -0800 (PST), Peter Lucas
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>> Why pick on me?
>>> Geeze, Louise! The forger strikes again.
>>
>> We really don't need everyone pointing out forgeries or not. I
>> rather enjoy the forgeries much more than the real Peter anyway.
>> Just let Peter go down in a huge ball of flames by himself. Nobody
>> needs to defend him.
>>
>> -sw
>
>I actually appreciate Carol's pointing them out. I think that,
>collectively, it saves us a lot of time.

Thankee. Our internet is going off soon, but I think Om is up to the
challenge.

Carol

"Jean B." > wrote:

> Sqwertz wrote:
>> Damsel in dis Dress > wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, 20 Dec 2008 14:36:48 -0800 (PST), Peter Lucas
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>> Why pick on me?
>>> Geeze, Louise! The forger strikes again.
>>
>> We really don't need everyone pointing out forgeries or not. I
>> rather enjoy the forgeries much more than the real Peter anyway.
>> Just let Peter go down in a huge ball of flames by himself. Nobody
>> needs to defend him.
>
> I actually appreciate Carol's pointing them out. I think that,
> collectively, it saves us a lot of time.

I think we all need to learn the difference rather than wasting yet
more bandwitdth and time pointing it out. Just killfile anything
regarding Peter and you might actually find some food/cooking posts.

-sw

Damsel in dis Dress > wrote:

> On Sat, 20 Dec 2008 20:05:24 -0500, "Jean B." > wrote:
>
>>Sqwertz wrote:
>>> Damsel in dis Dress > wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sat, 20 Dec 2008 14:36:48 -0800 (PST), Peter Lucas
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Why pick on me?
>>>> Geeze, Louise! The forger strikes again.
>>>
>>> We really don't need everyone pointing out forgeries or not. I
>>> rather enjoy the forgeries much more than the real Peter anyway.
>>> Just let Peter go down in a huge ball of flames by himself. Nobody
>>> needs to defend him.
>>>
>>> -sw
>>
>>I actually appreciate Carol's pointing them out. I think that,
>>collectively, it saves us a lot of time.
>
> Thankee. Our internet is going off soon, but I think Om is up to the
> challenge.

How appropriate.

-sw

Damsel in dis Dress wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Dec 2008 20:05:24 -0500, "Jean B." > wrote:
>
>> Sqwertz wrote:
>>> Damsel in dis Dress > wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sat, 20 Dec 2008 14:36:48 -0800 (PST), Peter Lucas
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Why pick on me?
>>>> Geeze, Louise! The forger strikes again.
>>> We really don't need everyone pointing out forgeries or not. I
>>> rather enjoy the forgeries much more than the real Peter anyway.
>>> Just let Peter go down in a huge ball of flames by himself. Nobody
>>> needs to defend him.
>>>
>>> -sw
>> I actually appreciate Carol's pointing them out. I think that,
>> collectively, it saves us a lot of time.
>
> Thankee. Our internet is going off soon, but I think Om is up to the
> challenge.
>
> Carol

You will come back, won't you? :-)

--
Jean B.

Sqwertz wrote:
> "Jean B." > wrote:
>
>> Sqwertz wrote:
>>> Damsel in dis Dress > wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sat, 20 Dec 2008 14:36:48 -0800 (PST), Peter Lucas
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Why pick on me?
>>>> Geeze, Louise! The forger strikes again.
>>> We really don't need everyone pointing out forgeries or not. I
>>> rather enjoy the forgeries much more than the real Peter anyway.
>>> Just let Peter go down in a huge ball of flames by himself. Nobody
>>> needs to defend him.
>> I actually appreciate Carol's pointing them out. I think that,
>> collectively, it saves us a lot of time.
>
> I think we all need to learn the difference rather than wasting yet
> more bandwitdth and time pointing it out. Just killfile anything
> regarding Peter and you might actually find some food/cooking posts.
>
> -sw

I don't think that would be fair to the real Peter. Besides, as
anyone knows, tr*lls frequently change their identities, so KFing
doesn't work too well.

--
Jean B.

In article >,
Sqwertz > wrote:

> Damsel in dis Dress > wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 20 Dec 2008 14:36:48 -0800 (PST), Peter Lucas
> > > wrote:
> >
> >>Why pick on me?
> >
> > Geeze, Louise! The forger strikes again.
>
> We really don't need everyone pointing out forgeries or not.

You weren't here the last two weeks. Some people got embarrassed. The
"pointing out" is to avoid that.

> I
> rather enjoy the forgeries much more than the real Peter anyway.

I'm not surprised. You have an even weirder sense of humor than me.

> Just let Peter go down in a huge ball of flames by himself. Nobody
> needs to defend him.

Feel free to get mud on your face and dripping down your front. I won't
find it funny but I'm sure some will.

--
Dan Abel
Petaluma, California USA

In article >,
sf > wrote:

> On Sat, 20 Dec 2008 18:29:39 -0500, "Cheryl"
> > wrote:
>
> >"Peter Lucas" > wrote in message
> 0.25...
> >
> >> I'll be glad when the Internet/Usenet is monitored/moderated entirely.
> >> Then
> >> immature, mentally retarded, little ****ants like kirkland won't be able
> >> to
> >> carry on like they do.
> >
> >I won't be. If my freedom of speech is ever taken away, it will be a sad
> >day. If you don't like what others say, ignore it.
>
> I still prefer an unmoderated rfc. There are lots of moderated groups
> on usenet and the intenet. Anyone with half a brain can find them.

I've never seen a moderated group of any worth. I was given one once
and it fell flat on its face.

--
Dan Abel
Petaluma, California USA

"Jean B." > wrote:

> Sqwertz wrote:
>> "Jean B." > wrote:
>>
>>> Sqwertz wrote:
>>>> Damsel in dis Dress > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, 20 Dec 2008 14:36:48 -0800 (PST), Peter Lucas
>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Why pick on me?
>>>>> Geeze, Louise! The forger strikes again.
>>>> We really don't need everyone pointing out forgeries or not. I
>>>> rather enjoy the forgeries much more than the real Peter anyway.
>>>> Just let Peter go down in a huge ball of flames by himself. Nobody
>>>> needs to defend him.
>>> I actually appreciate Carol's pointing them out. I think that,
>>> collectively, it saves us a lot of time.
>>
>> I think we all need to learn the difference rather than wasting yet
>> more bandwitdth and time pointing it out. Just killfile anything
>> regarding Peter and you might actually find some food/cooking posts.
>>
>> -sw
>
> I don't think that would be fair to the real Peter.

Most of his posts are OT and worthless to begin with. The guy is
only a notch above Andy. He's not worth the trouble he's dragged in
here. If he had any sense or decency, he would have left (or
morphed into somebody unrecognized by the trolls) by now rather than
subjecting the whole group to the constant trolling and other
bullshit.

ObFood: Hot chicken salad with a handful of Gerties pickled
asparagus. Breakfast was a ribeye steak. I'm going semi-carbless.

-sw

Dan Abel > wrote:

> In article >,
> Sqwertz > wrote:
>
>> Damsel in dis Dress > wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, 20 Dec 2008 14:36:48 -0800 (PST), Peter Lucas
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>>Why pick on me?
>>>
>>> Geeze, Louise! The forger strikes again.
>>
>> We really don't need everyone pointing out forgeries or not.
>
> You weren't here the last two weeks. Some people got embarrassed. The
> "pointing out" is to avoid that.

Well then all these people who were embarrassed need to learn to
tell the forgeries form the fakes. Everyone of them has that
capability.

> Feel free to get mud on your face and dripping down your front. I won't
> find it funny but I'm sure some will.

Has he become some sort of God while I was away? Surely you jest.

-sw

On Sat, 20 Dec 2008 20:41:26 -0500, "Jean B." > wrote:

>Damsel in dis Dress wrote:
>
>> Our internet is going off soon, but I think Om is up to the
>> challenge.
>
>You will come back, won't you? :-)

Yeah, we're moving and broke. Between the two, we decided to just
drop service until after we've moved into the new place, sometime in
early January.

Thank you for caring!
Carol

On Sat, 20 Dec 2008 20:02:50 -0600, Sqwertz >
wrote:

>Most of his posts are OT and worthless to begin with. The guy is
>only a notch above Andy. He's not worth the trouble he's dragged in
>here. If he had any sense or decency, he would have left (or
>morphed into somebody unrecognized by the trolls) by now rather than
>subjecting the whole group to the constant trolling and other
>bullshit.

That's a good idea, Steve!!!

>ObFood: Hot chicken salad with a handful of Gerties pickled
>asparagus. Breakfast was a ribeye steak. I'm going semi-carbless.

Low carb works - I'm gonna start again after the first, when we can
get our hands on some healthful foods again.

Carol

Damsel in dis Dress wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Dec 2008 20:41:26 -0500, "Jean B." > wrote:
>
>> Damsel in dis Dress wrote:
>>
>>> Our internet is going off soon, but I think Om is up to the
>>> challenge.
>>
>> You will come back, won't you? :-)
>
> Yeah, we're moving and broke. Between the two, we decided to just
> drop service until after we've moved into the new place, sometime in
> early January.
>
> Thank you for caring!

Good luck with your move!

nancy

On Sat, 20 Dec 2008 22:32:02 -0500, "Nancy Young"
> wrote:

>Damsel in dis Dress wrote:
>> On Sat, 20 Dec 2008 20:41:26 -0500, "Jean B." > wrote:
>>
>>> Damsel in dis Dress wrote:
>>>
>>>> Our internet is going off soon, but I think Om is up to the
>>>> challenge.
>>>
>>> You will come back, won't you? :-)
>>
>> Yeah, we're moving and broke. Between the two, we decided to just
>> drop service until after we've moved into the new place, sometime in
>> early January.
>>
>> Thank you for caring!
>
>Good luck with your move!
>
>nancy

Thanks! It's a nightmare, trying to move during one of the worst
winters in recent history. We are packing at this house, and our son
is living at the other house, painting and unpacking boxes. So far,
so good.

Carol

--
Change JamesBond to his agent number to reply.

Damsel in dis Dress wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Dec 2008 22:32:02 -0500, "Nancy Young"
> > wrote:

>> Good luck with your move!

> Thanks! It's a nightmare, trying to move during one of the worst
> winters in recent history. We are packing at this house, and our son
> is living at the other house, painting and unpacking boxes. So far,
> so good.

Ugh. As if moving isn't bad enough. We got well over a
foot of snow the day we moved in here. We had to drive
all over for the closing, then move. What a day.

I'll be glad when you're all in the new place.

nancy

Damsel in dis Dress > wrote in
:

> Low carb works - I'm gonna start again after the first, when we can
> get our hands on some healthful foods again.
>

I'm going back on the 1st too.

--

The beet goes on -Alan

Peter Lucas > wrote in
.25:

> And *that's* not going to happen (me dying) anytime soon!!
>
> kirkland will die soon. It's a chronic alcoholic, unemployed, alone, and
> divorced. Percentages are *definitely* in favour of it dying soon.

Peter. If you hadn't engaged this person in some other world, it wouldn't
be coming back on you.

You must take some blame for this.

In article >,
Sqwertz > wrote:

> Damsel in dis Dress > wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 20 Dec 2008 20:05:24 -0500, "Jean B." > wrote:
> >
> >>Sqwertz wrote:
> >>> Damsel in dis Dress > wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On Sat, 20 Dec 2008 14:36:48 -0800 (PST), Peter Lucas
> >>>> > wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Why pick on me?
> >>>> Geeze, Louise! The forger strikes again.
> >>>
> >>> We really don't need everyone pointing out forgeries or not. I
> >>> rather enjoy the forgeries much more than the real Peter anyway.
> >>> Just let Peter go down in a huge ball of flames by himself. Nobody
> >>> needs to defend him.
> >>>
> >>> -sw
> >>
> >>I actually appreciate Carol's pointing them out. I think that,
> >>collectively, it saves us a lot of time.
> >
> > Thankee. Our internet is going off soon, but I think Om is up to the
> > challenge.
>
> How appropriate.
>
> -sw

<lol> I don't point out all of the forgeries. I simply ignore most of
them. ;-)
--
Peace! Om

"Love and compassion are necessities, not luxuries. Without them humanity cannot survive." -- Dalai Lama

In article >,
Damsel in dis Dress > wrote:

> On Sat, 20 Dec 2008 20:41:26 -0500, "Jean B." > wrote:
>
> >Damsel in dis Dress wrote:
> >
> >> Our internet is going off soon, but I think Om is up to the
> >> challenge.
> >
> >You will come back, won't you? :-)
>
> Yeah, we're moving and broke. Between the two, we decided to just
> drop service until after we've moved into the new place, sometime in
> early January.
>
> Thank you for caring!
> Carol

We'll miss ya. ;-)

Cheers!
--
Peace! Om

"Love and compassion are necessities, not luxuries. Without them humanity cannot survive." -- Dalai Lama

In article >,
Damsel in dis Dress > wrote:

> On Sat, 20 Dec 2008 20:02:50 -0600, Sqwertz >
> wrote:
>
> >Most of his posts are OT and worthless to begin with. The guy is
> >only a notch above Andy. He's not worth the trouble he's dragged in
> >here. If he had any sense or decency, he would have left (or
> >morphed into somebody unrecognized by the trolls) by now rather than
> >subjecting the whole group to the constant trolling and other
> >bullshit.
>
> That's a good idea, Steve!!!

Huh. Hadn't thought of that. He could change ID's.

>
> >ObFood: Hot chicken salad with a handful of Gerties pickled
> >asparagus. Breakfast was a ribeye steak. I'm going semi-carbless.
>
> Low carb works - I'm gonna start again after the first, when we can
> get our hands on some healthful foods again.
>
> Carol

It does work, just slowly.
It still takes patience and time. <sigh>
--
Peace! Om

"Love and compassion are necessities, not luxuries. Without them humanity cannot survive." -- Dalai Lama

On Dec 21, 6:44*am, Omelet > wrote:
> In article >,
> *Damsel in dis Dress > wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 20 Dec 2008 20:41:26 -0500, "Jean B." > wrote:
>
> > >Damsel in dis Dress wrote:
>
> > >> Our internet is going off soon, but I think Om is up to the
> > >> challenge.
>
> > >You will come back, won't you? *:-)
>
> > Yeah, we're moving and broke. *Between the two, we decided to just
> > drop service until after we've moved into the new place, sometime in
> > early January.
>
> > Thank you for caring!
> > Carol
>
> We'll miss ya. ;-)

Thanks, lady! No idea when internet will cut out. TV is gone. At
some point, I'll just suddenly stop posting. Agent stopped working
for me for no apparent reason, so I'm back on Google.

Carol

Damsel in dis Dress > wrote in news:72f72501-c9f6-
:

> On Dec 21, 6:44*am, Omelet > wrote:
>> In article >,
>> *Damsel in dis Dress > wrote:
>>
>> > On Sat, 20 Dec 2008 20:41:26 -0500, "Jean B." >
wrote:
>>
>> > >Damsel in dis Dress wrote:
>>
>> > >> Our internet is going off soon, but I think Om is up to the
>> > >> challenge.
>>
>> > >You will come back, won't you? *:-)
>>
>> > Yeah, we're moving and broke. *Between the two, we decided to just
>> > drop service until after we've moved into the new place, sometime
in
>> > early January.
>>
>> > Thank you for caring!
>> > Carol
>>
>> We'll miss ya. ;-)
>
> Thanks, lady! No idea when internet will cut out. TV is gone. At
> some point, I'll just suddenly stop posting. Agent stopped working
> for me for no apparent reason, so I'm back on Google.
>
> Carol
>



We will wait with bated breath for the New Years story of the Great Ice
Shift :-)


Best wishes for Christmas for both you and Crash, Doc.

And don't let the Ice Shift wear you down!!

(And if you could get photo's...... that would be good :-)


Take care.



--
Peter Lucas
Brisbane
Australia

You will travel through the valley of rejection;
you will reside in the land of morning mists...and you will find your
home,
though it will not be where you left it.

"Jean B." > wrote in :

> Sqwertz wrote:
>> Damsel in dis Dress > wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, 20 Dec 2008 14:36:48 -0800 (PST), Peter Lucas
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>> Why pick on me?
>>> Geeze, Louise! The forger strikes again.
>>
>> We really don't need everyone pointing out forgeries or not. I
>> rather enjoy the forgeries much more than the real Peter anyway.
>> Just let Peter go down in a huge ball of flames by himself. Nobody
>> needs to defend him.
>>
>> -sw
>
> I actually appreciate Carol's pointing them out. I think that,
> collectively, it saves us a lot of time.
>



Yeah, spurtz is just a little jealous, is all.



--
Peter Lucas
Brisbane
Australia

You will travel through the valley of rejection;
you will reside in the land of morning mists...and you will find your home,
though it will not be where you left it.

"Jean B." > wrote in news:6r5l9aFf90i4U6
@mid.individual.net:

> Sqwertz wrote:
>> "Jean B." > wrote:
>>
>>> Sqwertz wrote:
>>>> Damsel in dis Dress > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, 20 Dec 2008 14:36:48 -0800 (PST), Peter Lucas
>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Why pick on me?
>>>>> Geeze, Louise! The forger strikes again.
>>>> We really don't need everyone pointing out forgeries or not. I
>>>> rather enjoy the forgeries much more than the real Peter anyway.
>>>> Just let Peter go down in a huge ball of flames by himself. Nobody
>>>> needs to defend him.
>>> I actually appreciate Carol's pointing them out. I think that,
>>> collectively, it saves us a lot of time.
>>
>> I think we all need to learn the difference rather than wasting yet
>> more bandwitdth and time pointing it out. Just killfile anything
>> regarding Peter and you might actually find some food/cooking posts.
>>
>> -sw
>
> I don't think that would be fair to the real Peter. Besides, as
> anyone knows, tr*lls frequently change their identities, so KFing
> doesn't work too well.
>


LOL!!

Jean.......... here's a hint.

spurtz is jealous, and doesn't like me because I don't talk to him.

Plus, I pinged him for a useless trolling piece of doggy doo-doo after
about 2 posts from 'him'.

Now the poor baby is upset!! :-)



--
Peter Lucas
Brisbane
Australia

You will travel through the valley of rejection;
you will reside in the land of morning mists...and you will find your
home,though it will not be where you left it.

Omelet > wrote in newsmpomelet-
:

> In article >,
> Damsel in dis Dress > wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 20 Dec 2008 20:02:50 -0600, Sqwertz >
>> wrote:
>>
>> >Most of his posts are OT and worthless to begin with. The guy is
>> >only a notch above Andy. He's not worth the trouble he's dragged in
>> >here. If he had any sense or decency, he would have left (or
>> >morphed into somebody unrecognized by the trolls) by now rather than
>> >subjecting the whole group to the constant trolling and other
>> >bullshit.
>>
>> That's a good idea, Steve!!!
>
> Huh. Hadn't thought of that. He could change ID's.
>




Ummmm, *no* he couldn't.





Unlike some/most people around here and all through the Internet, I have
*always* used my name.

My belief is that if you post something, if you believe it, and are
willing to back it 100%, put your bloody name to it, otherwise you're
just another nameless wannabe.

Back in '95 when I took the first stalker to court, the Feds and the
Judge suggested the same thing.

I told them the same thing. I say what I mean, and I mean what I say,
and I back it 100% which is why my name is on it....... and I don't use
X-no-archive either.

Sure, a lot of people have anonymous ID's/names. But quite a few of them
are willing to correspond via email. That's cool.

The anon's who hide behind their screens, and just have their 'on
screen' persona, are gutless...... scared little individuals that talk
up big via the Internet, but in real life...... nobody would notice if
they lived or died.


So I will thank you two ladies from encouraging that useless piece of
crap spurtz any further.


(You can't tell me you can't see the 'dynamics' behind it's posts????)


--
Peter Lucas
Brisbane
Australia

You will travel through the valley of rejection;
you will reside in the land of morning mists...and you will find your
home, though it will not be where you left it.

In article
>,
Damsel in dis Dress > wrote:

> On Dec 21, 6:44*am, Omelet > wrote:
> > In article >,
> > *Damsel in dis Dress > wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, 20 Dec 2008 20:41:26 -0500, "Jean B." > wrote:
> >
> > > >Damsel in dis Dress wrote:
> >
> > > >> Our internet is going off soon, but I think Om is up to the
> > > >> challenge.
> >
> > > >You will come back, won't you? *:-)
> >
> > > Yeah, we're moving and broke. *Between the two, we decided to just
> > > drop service until after we've moved into the new place, sometime in
> > > early January.
> >
> > > Thank you for caring!
> > > Carol
> >
> > We'll miss ya. ;-)
>
> Thanks, lady! No idea when internet will cut out. TV is gone. At
> some point, I'll just suddenly stop posting. Agent stopped working
> for me for no apparent reason, so I'm back on Google.
>
> Carol

If you are using Google, there is always the library... <g>

Cheers!
--
Peace! Om

"Love and compassion are necessities, not luxuries. Without them humanity cannot survive." -- Dalai Lama

elaich > wrote in :

> Peter Lucas > wrote in
> .25:
>
>> And *that's* not going to happen (me dying) anytime soon!!
>>
>> kirkland will die soon. It's a chronic alcoholic, unemployed, alone,
>> and divorced. Percentages are *definitely* in favour of it dying
>> soon.
>
> Peter. If you hadn't engaged this person in some other world, it
> wouldn't be coming back on you.
>
> You must take some blame for this.
>


If that is the case, then everyone should shut the hell up and not talk
to anyone else......... right now!!!


I used to talk to this grub kirkland, same as I used to talk to spurtz
and that moron morrow. (Do you notice their 'friendliness'???)

After a brief 'conflab'. I pinged it for the fraud and the liar it is.

It then had to publicly apologize for lying to everyone.


It has stalked me ever since......... which is going on for about 8-10
years now.


*I'M* to blame????????!!!!!!!!!!!


I don't think so.


BTW, FYI........ it shmoozed up to me in ozdebate (and via email)
because I'm ex-military.

Only trouble was, it told a tall tale of being in Vietnam and being
captured and tortured by the VC, only to have the Australian SASR mount
a 'rescue mission' to get him out. (*He* being a kiwi civvie Red Cross
worker!!)

What he didn't know, or just plain forgot in his chronic alcoholic daze,
was that I was a member of the Unit that he claimed 'rescued' him.

All members of that Unit have a very detailed knowledge of the history
of the Unit. Which includes *all* missions undertaken by the Unit.

Which is why he ended up aplogizing for being a liar and a fraud.


--
Peter Lucas
Brisbane
Australia

You will travel through the valley of rejection;
you will reside in the land of morning mists...and you will find your
home, though it will not be where you left it.