General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.photo.digital,rec.food.cooking,uk.transport.london,uk.d-i-y,rec.music.indian.misc
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3
Default SPAM

SPAM
  #2 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.photo.digital,rec.food.cooking,uk.transport.london,uk.d-i-y,rec.music.indian.misc
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5
Default SPAM

wrote:
>SPAM


Is your posting meant to have some meaning?

jue
  #3 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.photo.digital,rec.food.cooking,uk.transport.london,uk.d-i-y,rec.music.indian.misc
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 102
Default SPAM

In Jürgen Exner
> wrote:

> wrote:
>>SPAM

>
> Is your posting meant to have some meaning?


Apparently, rather than simply ignoring SPAM posts to his newsgroups
(which are actually filtered at the server by many competent news
providers), the poster, being a googlegrouper, thinks that he's doing
some sort of public service by making these posts.

http://www.improve-usenet.org/

Most of the people who post to Usenet via the clunky Google
Groups web interface are lusers or lamers. Because of their use
of a clunky Usenet web interface (and all Usenet web interfaces
suck - Usenet wasn't designed for webification and does not need
webification), they have no idea what Usenet is, how it works,
or how to use it properly. And, generally, they don't want to
learn.

--
Bert Hyman St. Paul, MN
  #4 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 352
Default SPAM

Bert Hyman wrote:
> In Jürgen Exner
> > wrote:
>
>> wrote:
>>> SPAM

>> Is your posting meant to have some meaning?

>
> Apparently, rather than simply ignoring SPAM posts to his newsgroups
> (which are actually filtered at the server by many competent news
> providers), the poster, being a googlegrouper, thinks that he's doing
> some sort of public service by making these posts.
>
>
http://www.improve-usenet.org/
>
> Most of the people who post to Usenet via the clunky Google
> Groups web interface are lusers or lamers. Because of their use
> of a clunky Usenet web interface (and all Usenet web interfaces
> suck - Usenet wasn't designed for webification and does not need
> webification), they have no idea what Usenet is, how it works,
> or how to use it properly. And, generally, they don't want to
> learn.
>


It's probably best to not believe everything you read...
  #6 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.photo.digital,rec.food.cooking,uk.transport.london,uk.d-i-y,rec.music.indian.misc
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2
Default SPAM

Jürgen Exner > wrote in
:

> wrote:
>>SPAM

>
> Is your posting meant to have some meaning?
>
> jue


Yes. That the Indians and Chinese are now the spam kings of the planet,
thanks to Google and Yahoo.
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
SPAM [email protected] General Cooking 1 02-01-2009 12:47 PM
SPAM [email protected] General Cooking 1 01-01-2009 04:16 PM
Spam Felony Conviction Upheld: No Free Speech To Spam Lee[_14_] General Cooking 1 04-03-2008 02:11 PM
Spam, spam, spam, spam, spam, baked beans, and spam. Sniper.308 General Cooking 3 01-03-2008 05:18 PM
MI5 spam? blake murphy General Cooking 0 19-11-2007 07:59 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:16 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 FoodBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Food and drink"