....continue to discuss Peter Lucas, et al?

Yes, I know I brought up the subject <again>, but it would seem if we *all*
stop discussing this topic it will quiet down or, by some stretch of the
imagination, go away altogether.

I cannot fathom why people feel compelled to continually dissect this
situation when a total "blackout" on the topic would be more effective.

--
Wayne Boatwright
(correct the spelling of "geemail" to reply)
************************************************** **********************
Date: Thursday, 01(I)/01(I)/09(MMIX)
************************************************** **********************
Today is: New Years Day
Countdown till Martin Luther King, Jr. Day
2wks 3dys 1hrs 18mins
************************************************** **********************
Cats must play with the ribbons when Mom is wrapping Christmas gifts.
************************************************** **********************

Wayne Boatwright > wrote in
5.247:

> ...continue to discuss Peter Lucas, et al?
>
> Yes, I know I brought up the subject <again>, but it would seem if we
> *all* stop discussing this topic it will quiet down or, by some
> stretch of the imagination, go away altogether.
>
> I cannot fathom why people feel compelled to continually dissect this
> situation when a total "blackout" on the topic would be more
> effective.
>


I'm *not* a topic, thank you very much Wayne.

I happen to be a person.



--
Peter Lucas
Brisbane
Australia


Be of good cheer about death and know this as a truth --that no evil can
happen to a good man, either in life or after death.

Socrates

Wayne Boatwright > wrote in
5.247:

> ...continue to discuss Peter Lucas, et al?
>


You probably haven't noticed, but the *only* people 'discussing' me, are
the stalker, the trolls, and it's sockpuppets.


Have you tried telling them to stop??


--
Peter Lucas
Brisbane
Australia


Be of good cheer about death and know this as a truth --that no evil can
happen to a good man, either in life or after death.

Socrates

PeterL wrote:

> You probably haven't noticed, but the *only* people 'discussing' me, are
> the stalker, the trolls, and it's sockpuppets.
>
>

Like you help the situation when you run around screaming "FORGERY,
FORGERY". If you stopped that they would most likely go away. Why don't
YOU just ignore them dumb****? You know use a killfile or the brain that
you supposedly have that appears to be barely functional?

> Have you tried telling them to stop??
>
>

Yeah that will work. Uh-huh.

rrb > wrote in
:

> PeterL wrote:
>
>> You probably haven't noticed, but the *only* people 'discussing' me,
>> are the stalker, the trolls, and it's sockpuppets.
>>
>>
>
> Like you help the situation when you run around screaming "FORGERY,
> FORGERY".


That's so that dumbshits, like you, will stop replying to them, thinking
it's me.



> If you stopped that they would most likely go away. Why
> don't YOU just ignore them dumb****?



I have, shit for brains. I only point it out to the dumbshits, like you.



--
Peter Lucas
Brisbane
Australia


Be of good cheer about death and know this as a truth --that no evil can
happen to a good man, either in life or after death.

Socrates

Wayne Boatwright > wrote:

> I cannot fathom why people feel compelled to continually dissect this
> situation when a total "blackout" on the topic would be more effective.

A blackout wouldn't stop it.

-sw

PeterL > wrote:

> I'm *not* a topic, thank you very much Wayne.
>
> I happen to be a person.

And a very ugly one at that. Inside and outside.

-sw

PeterL > wrote:

> rrb > wrote in
> :
>
>> Like you help the situation when you run around screaming "FORGERY,
>> FORGERY".
>
> That's so that dumbshits, like you, will stop replying to them, thinking
> it's me.

Now anybody who even mention the topic is automatically a "dumbshit"
and "shit for brains".

Peter has so much charm is leaking out of his asshole. Peter needs
euthanized.

-sw

SteveB <toquerville@zionvistas> wrote:

> I apologize for engaging PeterL (et al identities and morphs) and cyber
> ****/cock, whichever he/she is. I shall do better in the future, and make a
> valid attempt to keep up with Mr. PeterL's morphing.

Will you fix your clock, too? Your server's clock is correct, but
not your computer's.

-sw

On Fri, 2 Jan 2009 07:47:58 -0600, Swertz wrote:

> Wayne Boatwright > wrote:
>
>> I cannot fathom why people feel compelled to continually dissect this
>> situation when a total "blackout" on the topic would be more effective.
>
> A blackout wouldn't stop it.
>
> -sw

maybe a tactical nuke?

your pal,
blake

"Wayne Boatwright" > wrote in message
5.247...
> ...continue to discuss Peter Lucas, et al?
>
> Yes, I know I brought up the subject <again>, but it would seem if we
> *all*
> stop discussing this topic it will quiet down or, by some stretch of the
> imagination, go away altogether.
>
> I cannot fathom why people feel compelled to continually dissect this
> situation when a total "blackout" on the topic would be more effective.
>
> --
> Wayne Boatwright

I apologize for engaging PeterL (et al identities and morphs) and cyber
****/cock, whichever he/she is. I shall do better in the future, and make a
valid attempt to keep up with Mr. PeterL's morphing.

Steve

On Fri, 02 Jan 2009 05:50:57 GMT, Wayne Boatwright
> wrote:

>...continue to discuss Peter Lucas, et al?

I, for one, have started KFing every single troll as they crawl out
from under their respective bridges. Now I'm gonna KF this thread.

Carol

--
Change JamesBond to his agent number to reply.

On Fri 02 Jan 2009 07:42:47a, SteveB told us...

>
> "Wayne Boatwright" > wrote in message
> 5.247...
>> ...continue to discuss Peter Lucas, et al?
>>
>> Yes, I know I brought up the subject <again>, but it would seem if we
>> *all*
>> stop discussing this topic it will quiet down or, by some stretch of
>> the imagination, go away altogether.
>>
>> I cannot fathom why people feel compelled to continually dissect this
>> situation when a total "blackout" on the topic would be more effective.
>>
>> --
>> Wayne Boatwright
>
> I apologize for engaging PeterL (et al identities and morphs) and cyber
> ****/cock, whichever he/she is. I shall do better in the future, and
> make a valid attempt to keep up with Mr. PeterL's morphing.
>
> Steve

Thanks for helping, Steve!


--
Wayne Boatwright
(correct the spelling of "geemail" to reply)
************************************************** **********************
Date: Friday, 01(I)/02(II)/09(MMIX)
************************************************** **********************
Countdown till Martin Luther King, Jr. Day
2wks 2dys 15hrs 51mins
************************************************** **********************
Oxymoron: Terribly Nice.
************************************************** **********************

On Fri 02 Jan 2009 06:47:58a, Swertz told us...

> Wayne Boatwright > wrote:
>
>> I cannot fathom why people feel compelled to continually dissect this
>> situation when a total "blackout" on the topic would be more effective.
>
> A blackout wouldn't stop it.
>
> -sw
>

It wouldn't hurt to try it.

--
Wayne Boatwright
(correct the spelling of "geemail" to reply)
************************************************** **********************
Date: Friday, 01(I)/02(II)/09(MMIX)
************************************************** **********************
Countdown till Martin Luther King, Jr. Day
2wks 2dys 15hrs 51mins
************************************************** **********************
Oxymoron: Terribly Nice.
************************************************** **********************

On Fri 02 Jan 2009 07:37:09a, blake murphy told us...

> On Fri, 2 Jan 2009 07:47:58 -0600, Swertz wrote:
>
>> Wayne Boatwright > wrote:
>>
>>> I cannot fathom why people feel compelled to continually dissect this
>>> situation when a total "blackout" on the topic would be more effective.
>>
>> A blackout wouldn't stop it.
>>
>> -sw
>
> maybe a tactical nuke?
>
> your pal,
> blake
>

Do you have connections?

--
Wayne Boatwright
(correct the spelling of "geemail" to reply)
************************************************** **********************
Date: Friday, 01(I)/02(II)/09(MMIX)
************************************************** **********************
Countdown till Martin Luther King, Jr. Day
2wks 2dys 15hrs 50mins
************************************************** **********************
Being depressed by the poor isn't much worse than being bored by
the rich.
************************************************** **********************

On Fri 02 Jan 2009 08:03:07a, Damsel in dis Dress told us...

> On Fri, 02 Jan 2009 05:50:57 GMT, Wayne Boatwright
> > wrote:
>
>>...continue to discuss Peter Lucas, et al?
>
> I, for one, have started KFing every single troll as they crawl out
> from under their respective bridges. Now I'm gonna KF this thread.
>
> Carol
>

I know you have, Carol, and I encourage anyone to killfile this thread once
they've read it.

--
Wayne Boatwright
(correct the spelling of "geemail" to reply)
************************************************** **********************
Date: Friday, 01(I)/02(II)/09(MMIX)
************************************************** **********************
Countdown till Martin Luther King, Jr. Day
2wks 2dys 15hrs 49mins
************************************************** **********************
Permitting your life to be taken over by another person is like
letting the waiter eat your dinner. --Vernon Howard
************************************************** **********************

"SteveB" <toquerville@zionvistas> wrote in
:

>
> "Wayne Boatwright" > wrote in message
> 5.247...
>> ...continue to discuss Peter Lucas, et al?
>>
>> Yes, I know I brought up the subject <again>, but it would seem if we
>> *all*
>> stop discussing this topic it will quiet down or, by some stretch of
>> the imagination, go away altogether.
>>
>> I cannot fathom why people feel compelled to continually dissect this
>> situation when a total "blackout" on the topic would be more
>> effective.
>>
>> --
>> Wayne Boatwright
>
> I apologize for engaging PeterL (et al identities and morphs) and
> cyber ****/cock, whichever he/she is. I shall do better in the
> future, and make a valid attempt to keep up with Mr. PeterL's
> morphing.
>


And need I say more....... this ****** is a sock-puppet for the trolls/
stalkers.



--
Peter Lucas
Brisbane
Australia


Be of good cheer about death and know this as a truth --that no evil can
happen to a good man, either in life or after death.

Socrates

Sqwirtz > wrote in news:16oxnawt1te8z
:

> PeterL > wrote:
>
>> I'm *not* a topic, thank you very much Wayne.
>>
>> I happen to be a person.
>
> And a very ugly one at that. Inside and outside.
>


Looking in the mirror, are you, little boy?



--
Peter Lucas
Brisbane
Australia


Be of good cheer about death and know this as a truth --that no evil can
happen to a good man, either in life or after death.

Socrates

Sqwertz > wrote in
:

> PeterL > wrote:
>
>> rrb > wrote in
>> :
>>
>>> Like you help the situation when you run around screaming "FORGERY,
>>> FORGERY".
>>
>> That's so that dumbshits, like you, will stop replying to them,
>> thinking it's me.
>
> Now anybody who even mention the topic is automatically a "dumbshit"
> and "shit for brains".
>
> Peter has so much charm is leaking out of his asshole. Peter needs
> euthanized.
>
> -sw
>



And you need to go back to Grade 3 Basic English class, you dullard.


Come back when you have two brain cells.



--
Peter Lucas
Brisbane
Australia


Be of good cheer about death and know this as a truth --that no evil can
happen to a good man, either in life or after death.

Socrates

"PeterL" > wrote in message
.25...
> Wayne Boatwright > wrote in
> 5.247:
>
>> ...continue to discuss Peter Lucas, et al?
>>
>> Yes, I know I brought up the subject <again>, but it would seem if we
>> *all* stop discussing this topic it will quiet down or, by some
>> stretch of the imagination, go away altogether.
>>
>> I cannot fathom why people feel compelled to continually dissect this
>> situation when a total "blackout" on the topic would be more
>> effective.
>>
>
>
> I'm *not* a topic, thank you very much Wayne.
>
> I happen to be a person.

And a very nice one at that.

TFM®

"PeterL" > wrote in message
.25...
> Wayne Boatwright > wrote in
> 5.247:
>
>> ...continue to discuss Peter Lucas, et al?
>>
>
>
> You probably haven't noticed, but the *only* people 'discussing' me, are
> the stalker, the trolls, and it's sockpuppets.
>
>
> Have you tried telling them to stop??


I just ignore them. Asking a troll to stop would be akin to asking a cat to
stop puking hairballs.

I still feed the cats, and I still feed the trolls. Sorry about the latter.
Strong drink can lead to degradation of judgment.

TFM®

"Sqwertz" > wrote in message
...
> PeterL > wrote:
>
>> rrb > wrote in
>> :
>>
>>> Like you help the situation when you run around screaming "FORGERY,
>>> FORGERY".
>>
>> That's so that dumbshits, like you, will stop replying to them, thinking
>> it's me.
>
> Now anybody who even mention the topic is automatically a "dumbshit"
> and "shit for brains".
>
> Peter has so much charm is leaking out of his asshole. Peter needs
> euthanized.
>
> -sw

While I consider you a friend, you're not exactly oozing charm yourself,
dude.

TFM®

On Fri 02 Jan 2009 10:50:08a, Cornholio told us...

>
>
> "PeterL" > wrote in message
> .25...
>> Wayne Boatwright > wrote in
>> 5.247:
>>
>>> ...continue to discuss Peter Lucas, et al?
>>>
>>> Yes, I know I brought up the subject <again>, but it would seem if we
>>> *all* stop discussing this topic it will quiet down or, by some
>>> stretch of the imagination, go away altogether.
>>>
>>> I cannot fathom why people feel compelled to continually dissect this
>>> situation when a total "blackout" on the topic would be more
>>> effective.
>>>
>>
>>
>> I'm *not* a topic, thank you very much Wayne.
>>
>> I happen to be a person.
>
> And a very nice one at that.
>
> TFM®
>

I have no problem with Peter himself. It's all the insanity going on about
and around him. I will say that Peter hasn't really helped the situation
with his own responses to this idiocy. It would be better for everyone,
Peter included, to simply cease and desist responding or commenting on
these issues. Totally ignoring this kind of problem usually makes it go
away. The so called trolls and stalkers eventually give up when no one
pays them any attention.

Unfortunately, it's just too tempting to do so for many people.

--
Wayne Boatwright
(correct the spelling of "geemail" to reply)
************************************************** **********************
Date: Friday, 01(I)/02(II)/09(MMIX)
************************************************** **********************
Countdown till Martin Luther King, Jr. Day
2wks 2dys 13hrs 6mins
************************************************** **********************
Never trust a woman who tells her real age.
************************************************** **********************

In article >,
"Cornholio" > wrote:

> "PeterL" > wrote in message
> .25...
> > Wayne Boatwright > wrote in
> > 5.247:
> >
> >> ...continue to discuss Peter Lucas, et al?
> >>
> >> Yes, I know I brought up the subject <again>, but it would seem if we
> >> *all* stop discussing this topic it will quiet down or, by some
> >> stretch of the imagination, go away altogether.
> >>
> >> I cannot fathom why people feel compelled to continually dissect this
> >> situation when a total "blackout" on the topic would be more
> >> effective.
> >>
> >
> >
> > I'm *not* a topic, thank you very much Wayne.
> >
> > I happen to be a person.
>
> And a very nice one at that.
>
> TFM®

Indeed. ;-)
--
Peace! Om

"Love and compassion are necessities, not luxuries. Without them humanity cannot survive." -- Dalai Lama

In article >,
rrb > wrote:

> PeterL wrote:
>
> > You probably haven't noticed, but the *only* people 'discussing' me, are
> > the stalker, the trolls, and it's sockpuppets.
> >
> >
>
> Like you help the situation when you run around screaming "FORGERY,
> FORGERY". If you stopped that they would most likely go away. Why don't
> YOU just ignore them dumb****? You know use a killfile or the brain that
> you supposedly have that appears to be barely functional?
>
> > Have you tried telling them to stop??
> >
> >
>
> Yeah that will work. Uh-huh.

I'm glad that you got the point.

--
Dan Abel
Petaluma, California USA

In article >,
Swertz > wrote:

> Wayne Boatwright > wrote:
>
> > I cannot fathom why people feel compelled to continually dissect this
> > situation when a total "blackout" on the topic would be more effective.
>
> A blackout wouldn't stop it.

And if everybody in the world was just nice to each other, there would
be no more war. I think I'll suggest that. Who should I tell first?

:-(

--
Dan Abel
Petaluma, California USA

Dan Abel wrote:

> In article >,
> Swertz > wrote:
>
> > Wayne Boatwright > wrote:
> >
> > > I cannot fathom why people feel compelled to continually dissect this
> > > situation when a total "blackout" on the topic would be more
effective.
> >
> > A blackout wouldn't stop it.
>
> And if everybody in the world was just nice to each other, there would
> be no more war. I think I'll suggest that. Who should I tell first?
>
> :-(


Hamas...

--
Best
Greg

Wayne Boatwright wrote:
> On Fri 02 Jan 2009 10:50:08a, Cornholio told us...
>
>>
>> "PeterL" > wrote in message
>> .25...
>>> Wayne Boatwright > wrote in
>>> 5.247:
>>>
>>>> ...continue to discuss Peter Lucas, et al?
>>>>
>>>> Yes, I know I brought up the subject <again>, but it would seem if we
>>>> *all* stop discussing this topic it will quiet down or, by some
>>>> stretch of the imagination, go away altogether.
>>>>
>>>> I cannot fathom why people feel compelled to continually dissect this
>>>> situation when a total "blackout" on the topic would be more
>>>> effective.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I'm *not* a topic, thank you very much Wayne.
>>>
>>> I happen to be a person.
>> And a very nice one at that.
>>
>> TFM®
>>
>
> I have no problem with Peter himself. It's all the insanity going on about
> and around him. I will say that Peter hasn't really helped the situation
> with his own responses to this idiocy. It would be better for everyone,
> Peter included, to simply cease and desist responding or commenting on
> these issues. Totally ignoring this kind of problem usually makes it go
> away. The so called trolls and stalkers eventually give up when no one
> pays them any attention.
>
> Unfortunately, it's just too tempting to do so for many people.
>
>
Like a lot of folks, they may have SIWOTI disease ;D

On Fri, 02 Jan 2009 05:50:57 GMT, in rec.food.cooking, Wayne Boatwright
wrote:

> ...continue to discuss Peter Lucas, et al?
>
> Yes, I know I brought up the subject <again>, but it would seem if we *all*
> stop discussing this topic it will quiet down or, by some stretch of the
> imagination, go away altogether.
>
> I cannot fathom why people feel compelled to continually dissect this
> situation when a total "blackout" on the topic would be more effective.

I can not fathom why you would begin an entire new thread about Peter Lucas
of *all* topics. You are a pethetic little Nancy Boy. Why don't you just
hike your hiney down to Oz and let him have a poke at? You may as well
admit you have the hots for that fat,foul, loser.

On Fri 02 Jan 2009 03:36:37p, flitterbit told us...

> Wayne Boatwright wrote:
>> On Fri 02 Jan 2009 10:50:08a, Cornholio told us...
>>
>>>
>>> "PeterL" > wrote in message
>>> .25...
>>>> Wayne Boatwright > wrote in
>>>> 5.247:
>>>>
>>>>> ...continue to discuss Peter Lucas, et al?
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, I know I brought up the subject <again>, but it would seem if
>>>>> we *all* stop discussing this topic it will quiet down or, by some
>>>>> stretch of the imagination, go away altogether.
>>>>>
>>>>> I cannot fathom why people feel compelled to continually dissect
>>>>> this situation when a total "blackout" on the topic would be more
>>>>> effective.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I'm *not* a topic, thank you very much Wayne.
>>>>
>>>> I happen to be a person.
>>> And a very nice one at that.
>>>
>>> TFM®
>>>
>>
>> I have no problem with Peter himself. It's all the insanity going on
>> about and around him. I will say that Peter hasn't really helped the
>> situation with his own responses to this idiocy. It would be better
>> for everyone, Peter included, to simply cease and desist responding or
>> commenting on these issues. Totally ignoring this kind of problem
>> usually makes it go away. The so called trolls and stalkers eventually
>> give up when no one pays them any attention.
>>
>> Unfortunately, it's just too tempting to do so for many people.
>>
> >
> Like a lot of folks, they may have SIWOTI disease ;D
>

Good call! <g>

--
Wayne Boatwright
(correct the spelling of "geemail" to reply)
************************************************** **********************
Date: Friday, 01(I)/02(II)/09(MMIX)
************************************************** **********************
Countdown till Martin Luther King, Jr. Day
2wks 2dys 8hrs 6mins
************************************************** **********************
Shh! Be vewy quiet, I'm hunting wuntime errors!
************************************************** **********************

On Fri, 2 Jan 2009 06:16:03 +0000 (UTC), in rec.food.cooking, PeterL wrote:

> Wayne Boatwright > wrote in
> 5.247:
>
>> ...continue to discuss Peter Lucas, et al?
>>
>> Yes, I know I brought up the subject <again>, but it would seem if we
>> *all* stop discussing this topic it will quiet down or, by some
>> stretch of the imagination, go away altogether.
>>
>> I cannot fathom why people feel compelled to continually dissect this
>> situation when a total "blackout" on the topic would be more
>> effective.
>>
>
> I'm *not* a topic, thank you very much Wayne.

You are right. You are nothing.

>
> I happen to be a person.

If we all took a vote on it, you would lose that bet.

On Fri, 2 Jan 2009 08:21:53 +0000 (UTC), in rec.food.cooking, PeterL wrote:

> rrb > wrote in
> :
>
>> PeterL wrote:
>>
>>> You probably haven't noticed, but the *only* people 'discussing' me,
>>> are the stalker, the trolls, and it's sockpuppets.
>>>
>>
>> Like you help the situation when you run around screaming "FORGERY,
>> FORGERY".
>
> That's so that dumbshits, like you, will stop replying to them, thinking
> it's me.

That is hilarious. You're going to be a dumbshit in order to help the other
dumbshits stop replying to them. I knew you were stupid but just now
realize how stupid you *really* are.


>
>> If you stopped that they would most likely go away. Why
>> don't YOU just ignore them dumb****?
>
> I have, shit for brains. I only point it out to the dumbshits, like you.

Interesting. You ignore the trolls but point them out to dumbshits. How
does that work, asswipe?

On Fri, 2 Jan 2009 07:51:09 -0600, in rec.food.cooking, Sqwertz wrote:

> PeterL > wrote:
>
>> rrb > wrote in
>> :
>>
>>> Like you help the situation when you run around screaming "FORGERY,
>>> FORGERY".
>>
>> That's so that dumbshits, like you, will stop replying to them, thinking
>> it's me.
>
> Now anybody who even mention the topic is automatically a "dumbshit"
> and "shit for brains".
>
> Peter has so much charm is leaking out of his asshole. Peter needs
> euthanized.

Finally a sensible poster.

On Fri, 02 Jan 2009 17:59:18 GMT, in rec.food.cooking, Wayne Boatwright
wrote:

> On Fri 02 Jan 2009 10:50:08a, Cornholio told us...
>
>>
>> "PeterL" > wrote in message
>> .25...
>>> Wayne Boatwright > wrote in
>>> 5.247:
>>>
>>>> ...continue to discuss Peter Lucas, et al?
>>>>
>>>> Yes, I know I brought up the subject <again>, but it would seem if we
>>>> *all* stop discussing this topic it will quiet down or, by some
>>>> stretch of the imagination, go away altogether.
>>>>
>>>> I cannot fathom why people feel compelled to continually dissect this
>>>> situation when a total "blackout" on the topic would be more
>>>> effective.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I'm *not* a topic, thank you very much Wayne.
>>>
>>> I happen to be a person.
>>
>> And a very nice one at that.
>>
>> TFM®
>>
>
> I have no problem with Peter himself.

It's a well know fact you want that fat, sweaty pig wallowing all over you.

> It's all the insanity going on about and around him.

What planet are you on? Lucas causes the chaos. He thrives on it. If you
don't see it you are a sicker **** that he is.


> I will say that Peter hasn't really helped the situation with his own responses to this idiocy.

What did you do? Find a clue?

> It would be better for everyone,
> Peter included, to simply cease and desist responding or commenting on
> these issues. Totally ignoring this kind of problem usually makes it go
> away. The so called trolls and stalkers eventually give up when no one
> pays them any attention.
>
> Unfortunately, it's just too tempting to do so for many people.

Too late for it to go away Nancy boy. We will be here as long as Lucas is
here.

"Cornholio" > wrote in news:495e40ee$0$2567
:

>
>
> "PeterL" > wrote in message
> .25...
>> Wayne Boatwright > wrote in
>> 5.247:
>>
>>> ...continue to discuss Peter Lucas, et al?
>>>
>>> Yes, I know I brought up the subject <again>, but it would seem if
we
>>> *all* stop discussing this topic it will quiet down or, by some
>>> stretch of the imagination, go away altogether.
>>>
>>> I cannot fathom why people feel compelled to continually dissect
this
>>> situation when a total "blackout" on the topic would be more
>>> effective.
>>>
>>
>>
>> I'm *not* a topic, thank you very much Wayne.
>>
>> I happen to be a person.
>
> And a very nice one at that.
>


Thanks mate.

You'll be happy to know that you are one of only a very few people on
this newsgroup that don't go through life with (horse) blinkers on.



--
Peter Lucas
Brisbane
Australia


Be of good cheer about death and know this as a truth --that no evil can
happen to a good man, either in life or after death.

Socrates

Wayne Boatwright > wrote in
5.247:

> On Fri 02 Jan 2009 10:50:08a, Cornholio told us...
>
>>
>>
>> "PeterL" > wrote in message
>> .25...
>>> Wayne Boatwright > wrote in
>>> 5.247:
>>>
>>>> ...continue to discuss Peter Lucas, et al?
>>>>
>>>> Yes, I know I brought up the subject <again>, but it would seem if
>>>> we *all* stop discussing this topic it will quiet down or, by some
>>>> stretch of the imagination, go away altogether.
>>>>
>>>> I cannot fathom why people feel compelled to continually dissect
>>>> this situation when a total "blackout" on the topic would be more
>>>> effective.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I'm *not* a topic, thank you very much Wayne.
>>>
>>> I happen to be a person.
>>
>> And a very nice one at that.
>>
>> TFM®
>>
>
> I have no problem with Peter himself.


It doesn't seem that way.


> It's all the insanity going on
> about and around him. I will say that Peter hasn't really helped the
> situation with his own responses to this idiocy.


You don't like it when someone forge's you, do you?

*Especially* if people who supposedly know you, reply to the forger
thinking it's you.


> It would be better
> for everyone, Peter included, to simply cease and desist responding or
> commenting on these issues.


Ok...... and what about the posters who can't (or won't bother to) see
who they are replying to and continue talking to the forger/stalker?

I've done the non-response thing, but it's the morons in this group that
continually answer the trolls/stalkers that keep them here.

Your very own little friend, morrow, is the perfect example. Do you
*really* think he's going to listen to your plea??


> Totally ignoring this kind of problem
> usually makes it go away. The so called trolls and stalkers
> eventually give up when no one pays them any attention.


Someone is *always* going to give them the attention they desire,
because of pure laziness, or complete stupidity.



>
> Unfortunately, it's just too tempting to do so for many people.
>


You included.


--
Peter Lucas
Brisbane
Australia


Be of good cheer about death and know this as a truth --that no evil can
happen to a good man, either in life or after death.

Socrates

Omelet > wrote in newsmpomelet-
:

> In article >,
> "Cornholio" > wrote:
>
>> "PeterL" > wrote in message
>> .25...
>> > Wayne Boatwright > wrote in
>> > 5.247:
>> >
>> >> ...continue to discuss Peter Lucas, et al?
>> >>
>> >> Yes, I know I brought up the subject <again>, but it would seem if
we
>> >> *all* stop discussing this topic it will quiet down or, by some
>> >> stretch of the imagination, go away altogether.
>> >>
>> >> I cannot fathom why people feel compelled to continually dissect
this
>> >> situation when a total "blackout" on the topic would be more
>> >> effective.
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > I'm *not* a topic, thank you very much Wayne.
>> >
>> > I happen to be a person.
>>
>> And a very nice one at that.
>>
>> TFM®
>
> Indeed. ;-)



Bakatcha, Madam Om :-)


--
Peter Lucas
Brisbane
Australia


Be of good cheer about death and know this as a truth --that no evil can
happen to a good man, either in life or after death.

Socrates

"Cornholio" > wrote in
om:


>
> I still feed the cats, and I still feed the trolls. Sorry about the
> latter. Strong drink can lead to degradation of judgment.
>


Strong drink will do that :-)


Did you end up trying the TimTam straw trick??


--
Peter Lucas
Brisbane
Australia


Be of good cheer about death and know this as a truth --that no evil can
happen to a good man, either in life or after death.

Socrates

Dan Abel > wrote in
:

> In article >,
> rrb > wrote:
>
>> PeterL wrote:
>>
>> > You probably haven't noticed, but the *only* people 'discussing'
>> > me, are the stalker, the trolls, and it's sockpuppets.
>> >
>> >
>>
>> Like you help the situation when you run around screaming "FORGERY,
>> FORGERY". If you stopped that they would most likely go away. Why
>> don't YOU just ignore them dumb****? You know use a killfile or the
>> brain that you supposedly have that appears to be barely functional?
>>
>> > Have you tried telling them to stop??
>> >
>> >
>>
>> Yeah that will work. Uh-huh.
>
> I'm glad that you got the point.
>



I severely doubt he did, Dan.



--
Peter Lucas
Brisbane
Australia


Be of good cheer about death and know this as a truth --that no evil can
happen to a good man, either in life or after death.

Socrates

Dan Abel > wrote in
:

> In article >,
> Swertz > wrote:
>
>> Wayne Boatwright > wrote:
>>
>> > I cannot fathom why people feel compelled to continually dissect
>> > this situation when a total "blackout" on the topic would be more
>> > effective.
>>
>> A blackout wouldn't stop it.
>
> And if everybody in the world was just nice to each other, there would
> be no more war. I think I'll suggest that. Who should I tell first?
>



Osama bin Laden.


But if your 'world peace' movement catches on, all the soldiers of the
world will be out of a job, there'll be massive unemployment, the crime
rate will spiral out of control, the Gross National Debt will do the
same, and some shiny-arse politician will come up with the 'brilliant'
plan to stage a war to get the economy back on track.


--
Peter Lucas
Brisbane
Australia


Be of good cheer about death and know this as a truth --that no evil can
happen to a good man, either in life or after death.

Socrates