On Fri, 09 Jan 2009 21:03:02 -0600, Peter Lucas wrote:

> On Fri, 09 Jan 2009 15:04:28 GMT, in rec.food.cooking, blake murphy
> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 8 Jan 2009 22:50:49 -0600, marsha wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, 9 Jan 2009 01:04:11 +0000 (UTC), in rec.food.cooking, Peter
>>> Lucas wrote:
>>>
>>>> Chemiker > wrote in
>>>> :
>>>>
>>>>> On
>>>>>
>>>>>>Chemiker > wrote in
>>>>>>news:q9rcm41j1lu4ug3f42rgk1r6q2ira90d1g@4ax. com:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I, for one, would like to see some of the dishes you guys prepare.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>As just about everyone here does.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>It's only one pretentious little ****, who doesn't even post any
>>>>>>pics itself, that's kicking up a stink. Ignore it.
>>>>>
>>>>> Peter, you seem to be a decent mate on a.b.c.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks.
>>>>
>>>> Some idiots here don't seem to realise that if you speak nasty to
>>>> someone, expect to get nasty back. And when they talk nasty to me,
>>>> and they cop it back, they get all weepy and 'woe is me' and label
>>>> *me* an asshole!! LOL!!
>>>>
>>>> Nice gets nice in return. Nasty gets nasty back.
>>>
>>> ROFL - Peter Lucas feewings been hurt. You don't have a clue what
>>> nasty is you illiterate twink. You live in ignorance. You will always
>>> be ignorant.
>>
>> he thinks he's some kind of usenet warrior. funny in a pathetic kind
>> of way.
>
> He is a sad little person. His greatest fear right now is having the
> really bad stuff he's pulled exposed in this newsgroup. The best is yet
> to come for Lucas.

Yep. He aint gonna get to run away from his past <G>

On Sat, 10 Jan 2009 08:33:54 -0800, in rec.food.cooking, sf wrote:

> On Fri, 9 Jan 2009 23:54:34 -0600, sf > wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 09 Jan 2009 20:44:03 -0800, in rec.food.cooking, sf wrote:
>>
>>> On 9 Jan 2009 21:14:43 GMT, "Default User" >
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Dan Abel wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> In article >,
>>>>> Christine Dabney > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> > Just stop. You are losing whatever friends you ever had here....
>>>>>
>>>>> You really should check to see who you are replying to before you
>>>>> post this much.
>>>>
>>>>Just boggles my mind that some regulars are unable to tell the
>>>>difference at this stage of the game.
>>>>
>>> That's not the real point... that the stalkers haven't been KFed by
>>> this time. They are pretty easy to notice. I've been fooled, but
>>> it's the old "fool me twice" thing. Hopefully if I was fooled a third
>>> time, I noticed and kill filed the bloomin bastid.
>>
>>You're the brightest bulb in the pack aren't you?
>
> And you're an asshole many times over.

How many times is that?