Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I found this recipe on the web in 1997, I believe. After a couple
years of not keeping track of where I found things (newbie), I traced most of my recipes to their sources. This one, no joy. So my name's on it just so you know where YOU got it. I only wish I could put something this delicious together! * Exported from MasterCook * Mahogany Chicken Wings Recipe By :Carol Peterson Serving Size : 0 Preparation Time :0:00 Categories : Appetizers/Dips Poultry Signature Dishes Snacks-Savory Amount Measure Ingredient -- Preparation Method -------- ------------ -------------------------------- 1/2 cup hoisin sauce 1/4 cup plum sauce 1/2 cup soy sauce 1/4 cup saki (rice wine) 1/4 cup cider vinegar 3 tablespoons honey 1 tablespoon garlic -- finely minced 1 bunch green onions -- finely minced 5 pounds chicken wings Combine all ingredients except chicken. Bring to a boil, lower heat, and cook for an additional 5-10 minutes. Cool. Cut wings at joints, forming "drummies," "sticks," and "tips". Discard tips, or save for making soup stock. Place wings in a container for marinating (Zip-Loc bags work great for this), then cover with sauce. Refrigerate at least overnight, up to two days. Turn occasionally. Line two large jelly roll pans with parchment paper to minimize sticking. Preheat oven to 375°F. Place individual chicken pieces on pans and bake, uncovered, for 20 minutes. Remove liquified chicken fat and juices from pan. Turn chicken pieces and baste with marinating sauce. Bake another 20 minutes, turn chicken and baste. Repeat twice more, watching carefully during the last baking cycle, so the sauce doesn't burn. Serve hot or cold. Yield: 5 dozen -- Change "invalid" to JamesBond's agent number to reply. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 9, 3:12*pm, Damsel in dis Dress >
wrote: > I found this recipe on the web in 1997, I believe. *After a couple > years of not keeping track of where I found things (newbie), I traced > most of my recipes to their sources. *This one, no joy. *So my name's > on it just so you know where YOU got it. *I only wish I could put > something this delicious together! > > * * * * * * * * * * * * Exported from MasterCook * > > * * * * * * * * * * * * * Mahogany Chicken Wings > > Recipe By * * :Carol Peterson > Serving Size *: 0 * * Preparation Time :0:00 > Categories * *: Appetizers/Dips * * * * * * * * Poultry > * * * * * * * * Signature Dishes * * * * * * * *Snacks-Savory > > * Amount *Measure * * * Ingredient -- Preparation Method > -------- *------------ *-------------------------------- > * * *1/2 * * * * * cup *hoisin sauce > * * *1/4 * * * * * cup *plum sauce > * * *1/2 * * * * * cup *soy sauce > * * *1/4 * * * * * cup *saki (rice wine) > * * *1/4 * * * * * cup *cider vinegar > * 3 * * * *tablespoons *honey > * 1 * * * * tablespoon *garlic -- finely minced > * 1 * * * * * * *bunch *green onions -- finely minced > * 5 * * * * * * pounds *chicken wings > > Combine all ingredients except chicken. *Bring to a boil, lower heat, > and cook for an additional 5-10 minutes. *Cool. > > Cut wings at joints, forming "drummies," "sticks," and "tips". Discard > tips, or save for making soup stock. > > Place wings in a container for marinating (Zip-Loc bags work great for > this), then cover with sauce. * Refrigerate at least overnight, up to > two days. *Turn occasionally. > > Line two large jelly roll pans with parchment paper to minimize > sticking. *Preheat oven to 375°F. > > Place individual chicken pieces on pans and bake, uncovered, for 20 > minutes. *Remove liquified chicken fat and juices from pan. *Turn > chicken pieces and baste with marinating sauce. > > Bake another 20 minutes, turn chicken and baste. *Repeat twice more, > watching carefully during the last baking cycle, so the sauce doesn't > burn. > > Serve hot or cold. > > Yield: *5 dozen > > -- > Change "invalid" to JamesBond's agent number to reply. hey that looks the go have heaps of chook at the moment thanks |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 9, 6:06*pm, Pits09 > wrote:
> On Jan 9, 3:12*pm, Damsel in dis Dress > > wrote: > > > > > > > I found this recipe on the web in 1997, I believe. *After a couple > > years of not keeping track of where I found things (newbie), I traced > > most of my recipes to their sources. *This one, no joy. *So my name's > > on it just so you know where YOU got it. *I only wish I could put > > something this delicious together! > > > * * * * * * * * * * * * Exported from MasterCook * > > > * * * * * * * * * * * * * Mahogany Chicken Wings > > > Recipe By * * :Carol Peterson > > Serving Size *: 0 * * Preparation Time :0:00 > > Categories * *: Appetizers/Dips * * * * * * * * Poultry > > * * * * * * * * Signature Dishes * * * * * * * *Snacks-Savory > > > * Amount *Measure * * * Ingredient -- Preparation Method > > -------- *------------ *-------------------------------- > > * * *1/2 * * * * * cup *hoisin sauce > > * * *1/4 * * * * * cup *plum sauce > > * * *1/2 * * * * * cup *soy sauce > > * * *1/4 * * * * * cup *saki (rice wine) > > * * *1/4 * * * * * cup *cider vinegar > > * 3 * * * *tablespoons *honey > > * 1 * * * * tablespoon *garlic -- finely minced > > * 1 * * * * * * *bunch *green onions -- finely minced > > * 5 * * * * * * pounds *chicken wings > > > Combine all ingredients except chicken. *Bring to a boil, lower heat, > > and cook for an additional 5-10 minutes. *Cool. > > > Cut wings at joints, forming "drummies," "sticks," and "tips". Discard > > tips, or save for making soup stock. > > > Place wings in a container for marinating (Zip-Loc bags work great for > > this), then cover with sauce. * Refrigerate at least overnight, up to > > two days. *Turn occasionally. > > > Line two large jelly roll pans with parchment paper to minimize > > sticking. *Preheat oven to 375°F. > > > Place individual chicken pieces on pans and bake, uncovered, for 20 > > minutes. *Remove liquified chicken fat and juices from pan. *Turn > > chicken pieces and baste with marinating sauce. > > > Bake another 20 minutes, turn chicken and baste. *Repeat twice more, > > watching carefully during the last baking cycle, so the sauce doesn't > > burn. > > > Serve hot or cold. > > > Yield: *5 dozen > > > -- > > Change "invalid" to JamesBond's agent number to reply. > > hey that looks the go * * have *heaps of chook at the moment * *thanks- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - You live in a pleasant part of WA Phil, I sometimes envy you. cheers not-bevan |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 09 Jan 2009 00:12:17 -0600, Damsel in dis Dress
> wrote: >I found this recipe on the web in 1997, I believe. After a couple >years of not keeping track of where I found things (newbie), I traced >most of my recipes to their sources. This one, no joy. So my name's >on it just so you know where YOU got it. I only wish I could put >something this delicious together! > > > * Exported from MasterCook * > > Mahogany Chicken Wings > Yeah, I know how you feel. They were all the rage around here in the '80s. -- I never worry about diets. The only carrots that interest me are the number of carats in a diamond. Mae West |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 8, 10:12*pm, Damsel in dis Dress >
wrote: > I found this recipe on the web in 1997, I believe. *After a couple > years of not keeping track of where I found things (newbie), I traced > most of my recipes to their sources. *This one, no joy. *So my name's > on it just so you know where YOU got it. *I only wish I could put > something this delicious together! > > * * * * * * * * * * * * * Mahogany Chicken Wings > ...... > Place individual chicken pieces on pans and bake, uncovered, for 20 > minutes. *Remove liquified chicken fat and juices from pan. *Turn > chicken pieces and baste with marinating sauce. > > Bake another 20 minutes, turn chicken and baste. *Repeat twice more, > watching carefully during the last baking cycle, so the sauce doesn't > burn. > ..... If I'm reading this right that would be 80 minutes at 375F°. Seems like a very long time for wiings. -aem |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 9 Jan 2009 09:37:25 -0800 (PST), aem >
wrote: >On Jan 8, 10:12*pm, Damsel in dis Dress > >wrote: >> I found this recipe on the web in 1997, I believe. *After a couple >> years of not keeping track of where I found things (newbie), I traced >> most of my recipes to their sources. *This one, no joy. *So my name's >> on it just so you know where YOU got it. *I only wish I could put >> something this delicious together! >> >> * * * * * * * * * * * * * Mahogany Chicken Wings >> ...... >> Place individual chicken pieces on pans and bake, uncovered, for 20 >> minutes. *Remove liquified chicken fat and juices from pan. *Turn >> chicken pieces and baste with marinating sauce. >> >> Bake another 20 minutes, turn chicken and baste. *Repeat twice more, >> watching carefully during the last baking cycle, so the sauce doesn't >> burn. >> ..... > >If I'm reading this right that would be 80 minutes at 375F°. Seems >like a very long time for wiings. -aem It is. It's a very long time. I can't stand the slimy inside of the skin, and this cooks every remnant of it away. You could cook it less if you don't share my preferences. This IS the original recipe, wherever the heck it came from. Either way, they're delicious! Carol -- Change "invalid" to JamesBond's agent number to reply. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 9, 9:47 am, Damsel in dis Dress >
wrote: > On Fri, 9 Jan 2009 09:37:25 -0800 (PST), aem > > wrote: > > > > >On Jan 8, 10:12 pm, Damsel in dis Dress > > >wrote: > >> I found this recipe on the web in 1997, I believe. After a couple > >> years of not keeping track of where I found things (newbie), I traced > >> most of my recipes to their sources. This one, no joy. So my name's > >> on it just so you know where YOU got it. I only wish I could put > >> something this delicious together! > > >> Mahogany Chicken Wings > >> ...... > >> Place individual chicken pieces on pans and bake, uncovered, for 20 > >> minutes. Remove liquified chicken fat and juices from pan. Turn > >> chicken pieces and baste with marinating sauce. > > >> Bake another 20 minutes, turn chicken and baste. Repeat twice more, > >> watching carefully during the last baking cycle, so the sauce doesn't > >> burn. > >> ..... > > >If I'm reading this right that would be 80 minutes at 375F°. Seems > >like a very long time for wiings. -aem > > It is. It's a very long time. I can't stand the slimy inside of the > skin, and this cooks every remnant of it away. You could cook it less > if you don't share my preferences. This IS the original recipe, > wherever the heck it came from. > > Either way, they're delicious! > Glad to have that clarification. The unctuousness I like about wings is the slimy you dislke. No problem, different strokes. I'll cook 'em about 45 minutes..... -aem |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Damsel in dis Dress wrote:
> I found this recipe on the web in 1997, I believe. After a couple > years of not keeping track of where I found things (newbie), I traced > most of my recipes to their sources. This one, no joy. So my name's > on it just so you know where YOU got it. I only wish I could put > something this delicious together! > > > * Exported from MasterCook * > > Mahogany Chicken Wings > > Recipe By :Carol Peterson > Serving Size : 0 Preparation Time :0:00 > Categories : Appetizers/Dips Poultry > Signature Dishes Snacks-Savory > > Amount Measure Ingredient -- Preparation Method > -------- ------------ -------------------------------- > 1/2 cup hoisin sauce > 1/4 cup plum sauce > 1/2 cup soy sauce > 1/4 cup saki (rice wine) > 1/4 cup cider vinegar > 3 tablespoons honey > 1 tablespoon garlic -- finely minced > 1 bunch green onions -- finely minced > 5 pounds chicken wings > > Combine all ingredients except chicken. Bring to a boil, lower heat, > and cook for an additional 5-10 minutes. Cool. > > Cut wings at joints, forming "drummies," "sticks," and "tips". Discard > tips, or save for making soup stock. > > Place wings in a container for marinating (Zip-Loc bags work great for > this), then cover with sauce. Refrigerate at least overnight, up to > two days. Turn occasionally. > > Line two large jelly roll pans with parchment paper to minimize > sticking. Preheat oven to 375°F. > > Place individual chicken pieces on pans and bake, uncovered, for 20 > minutes. Remove liquified chicken fat and juices from pan. Turn > chicken pieces and baste with marinating sauce. > > Bake another 20 minutes, turn chicken and baste. Repeat twice more, > watching carefully during the last baking cycle, so the sauce doesn't > burn. > > Serve hot or cold. > > Yield: 5 dozen > This sounds yummy, Carol. It's saved. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 9 Jan 2009 10:58:22 -0800 (PST), aem >
wrote: >Glad to have that clarification. The unctuousness I like about wings >is the slimy you dislke. No problem, different strokes. I'll cook >'em about 45 minutes..... -aem I'm in the 60 minute range. LOL! -- I never worry about diets. The only carrots that interest me are the number of carats in a diamond. Mae West |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri 09 Jan 2009 11:58:22a, aem told us...
> On Jan 9, 9:47 am, Damsel in dis Dress > > wrote: >> On Fri, 9 Jan 2009 09:37:25 -0800 (PST), aem > >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >On Jan 8, 10:12 pm, Damsel in dis Dress > >> >wrote: >> >> I found this recipe on the web in 1997, I believe. After a couple >> >> years of not keeping track of where I found things (newbie), I traced >> >> most of my recipes to their sources. This one, no joy. So my name's >> >> on it just so you know where YOU got it. I only wish I could put >> >> something this delicious together! >> >> >> Mahogany Chicken Wings >> >> ...... >> >> Place individual chicken pieces on pans and bake, uncovered, for 20 >> >> minutes. Remove liquified chicken fat and juices from pan. Turn >> >> chicken pieces and baste with marinating sauce. >> >> >> Bake another 20 minutes, turn chicken and baste. Repeat twice more, >> >> watching carefully during the last baking cycle, so the sauce doesn't >> >> burn. >> >> ..... >> >> >If I'm reading this right that would be 80 minutes at 375F°. Seems >> >like a very long time for wiings. -aem >> >> It is. It's a very long time. I can't stand the slimy inside of the >> skin, and this cooks every remnant of it away. You could cook it less >> if you don't share my preferences. This IS the original recipe, >> wherever the heck it came from. >> >> Either way, they're delicious! >> > Glad to have that clarification. The unctuousness I like about wings > is the slimy you dislke. No problem, different strokes. I'll cook > 'em about 45 minutes..... -aem > I'm glad to see you using the word "unctuousness". I used it once in here an got slammed for it. -- Wayne Boatwright (correct the spelling of "geemail" to reply) ************************************************** ********************** Date: Friday, 01(I)/09(IX)/09(MMIX) ************************************************** ********************** Countdown till Martin Luther King, Jr. Day 1wks 2dys 2hrs 21mins ************************************************** ********************** My whole life is a movie -- it's just that there are no dissolves. I have to live every agonizing moment of it. My life needs editing. ************************************************** ********************** |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article 7>,
Wayne Boatwright > wrote: > I'm glad to see you using the word "unctuousness". I used it once in here > an got slammed for it. I just looked it up for food and found out I hadn't really understood the social meaning either. I'll struggle with 'sanguine' until the day I die. leo |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri 09 Jan 2009 09:56:43p, Leonard Blaisdell told us...
> In article 7>, > Wayne Boatwright > wrote: > >> I'm glad to see you using the word "unctuousness". I used it once in >> here an got slammed for it. > > I just looked it up for food and found out I hadn't really understood > the social meaning either. I'll struggle with 'sanguine' until the day I > die. > > leo > Well, we could rub a wing or two across our foreheads. :-) I could deal with a sanguine steak! -- Wayne Boatwright (correct the spelling of "geemail" to reply) ************************************************** ********************** Date: Friday, 01(I)/09(IX)/09(MMIX) ************************************************** ********************** Countdown till Martin Luther King, Jr. Day 1wks 2dys 1hrs 52mins ************************************************** ********************** If a program is useless, it must be documented. ************************************************** ********************** |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 09 Jan 2009 20:56:43 -0800, Leonard Blaisdell
> wrote: >I'll struggle with 'sanguine' until the day I die. LOL! I have no problem with that word. -- I never worry about diets. The only carrots that interest me are the number of carats in a diamond. Mae West |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article >,
sf > wrote: > LOL! I have no problem with that word. I am sanguine that Wayne's steak will be sanguine and know that the butchers are sanguine who cut the meat. I don't, however, have a sanguine complexion, although one of the butchers may. Speaking of butchers, William the Conqueror was sanguine about defeating England, but only in a sanguinary way. I find now that fine steaks are both unctuous and sanguine. I thought they just tasted good. No rip on Wayne. I still don't get 'sanguine'. How the hell do you get optimistic from bloody? leo |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri 09 Jan 2009 11:15:20p, Leonard Blaisdell told us...
> In article >, > sf > wrote: > >> LOL! I have no problem with that word. > > I am sanguine that Wayne's steak will be sanguine and know that the > butchers are sanguine who cut the meat. I don't, however, have a > sanguine complexion, although one of the butchers may. Speaking of > butchers, William the Conqueror was sanguine about defeating England, > but only in a sanguinary way. > I find now that fine steaks are both unctuous and sanguine. I thought > they just tasted good. No rip on Wayne. I still don't get 'sanguine'. > How the hell do you get optimistic from bloody? > > leo > LOL! I don't get optimistic from bloody, and FTM I don't like bloody steaks. :-) -- Wayne Boatwright (correct the spelling of "geemail" to reply) ************************************************** ********************** Date: Friday, 01(I)/09(IX)/09(MMIX) ************************************************** ********************** Countdown till Martin Luther King, Jr. Day 1wks 2dys 42mins ************************************************** ********************** If Cthulhu calls... let the machine pick it up. ************************************************** ********************** |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 09 Jan 2009 22:15:20 -0800, Leonard Blaisdell
> wrote: >How the hell do you get optimistic from bloody? Maybe it was by being on the "other side" of the equation. -- I never worry about diets. The only carrots that interest me are the number of carats in a diamond. Mae West |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 10 Jan 2009 06:20:30 GMT, Wayne Boatwright
> wrote: >On Fri 09 Jan 2009 11:15:20p, Leonard Blaisdell told us... > >> In article >, >> sf > wrote: >> >>> LOL! I have no problem with that word. >> >> I am sanguine that Wayne's steak will be sanguine and know that the >> butchers are sanguine who cut the meat. I don't, however, have a >> sanguine complexion, although one of the butchers may. Speaking of >> butchers, William the Conqueror was sanguine about defeating England, >> but only in a sanguinary way. >> I find now that fine steaks are both unctuous and sanguine. I thought >> they just tasted good. No rip on Wayne. I still don't get 'sanguine'. >> How the hell do you get optimistic from bloody? >> >> leo >> > >LOL! I don't get optimistic from bloody, and FTM I have no idea what FTM means.... >I don't like bloody steaks. :-) OK, Buddy. This is where we differ. I only want my cow to stop kicking. I went to Webster (I'm not into linguistics) and input sanguine. Here is what Webster had to say: #3: having blood as the predominating bodily humor; also: having the bodily conformation and temperament held characteristic of such predominance and marked by sturdiness, high color, and cheerfulness There you go! Now you see the train of thought. ![]() -- I never worry about diets. The only carrots that interest me are the number of carats in a diamond. Mae West |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri 09 Jan 2009 11:59:23p, sf told us...
> On Sat, 10 Jan 2009 06:20:30 GMT, Wayne Boatwright > > wrote: > >>On Fri 09 Jan 2009 11:15:20p, Leonard Blaisdell told us... >> >>> In article >, >>> sf > wrote: >>> >>>> LOL! I have no problem with that word. >>> >>> I am sanguine that Wayne's steak will be sanguine and know that the >>> butchers are sanguine who cut the meat. I don't, however, have a >>> sanguine complexion, although one of the butchers may. Speaking of >>> butchers, William the Conqueror was sanguine about defeating England, >>> but only in a sanguinary way. >>> I find now that fine steaks are both unctuous and sanguine. I thought >>> they just tasted good. No rip on Wayne. I still don't get 'sanguine'. >>> How the hell do you get optimistic from bloody? >>> >>> leo >>> >> >>LOL! I don't get optimistic from bloody, and FTM > > I have no idea what FTM means.... FTM = for that matter >>I don't like bloody steaks. :-) > > OK, Buddy. This is where we differ. I only want my cow to stop > kicking. > > I went to Webster (I'm not into linguistics) and input sanguine. > > Here is what Webster had to say: > > #3: having blood as the predominating bodily humor; also: having the > bodily conformation and temperament held characteristic of such > predominance and marked by sturdiness, high color, and cheerfulness > > There you go! Now you see the train of thought. > > ![]() > > Bloody good, Barbara. -- Wayne Boatwright (correct the spelling of "geemail" to reply) ************************************************** ********************** Date: Saturday, 01(I)/10(X)/09(MMIX) ************************************************** ********************** Countdown till Martin Luther King, Jr. Day 1wks 1dys 23hrs 56mins ************************************************** ********************** Protect your right to ARM BEARS!!! ************************************************** ********************** |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article >,
sf > wrote: > Maybe it was by being on the "other side" of the equation. One last response and I'll let this die. A friend is sanguine about America's future. (optimistic) A foe is sanguine about America's future. (bloodthirsty) To me, sanguine is a one word oxymoron. That's why I won't understand the word until the day I die. I don't think a linguist could explain it to me. leo |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat 10 Jan 2009 12:23:37a, Leonard Blaisdell told us...
> In article >, > sf > wrote: > >> Maybe it was by being on the "other side" of the equation. > > One last response and I'll let this die. > A friend is sanguine about America's future. (optimistic) > A foe is sanguine about America's future. (bloodthirsty) > To me, sanguine is a one word oxymoron. That's why I won't understand > the word until the day I die. I don't think a linguist could explain it > to me. > > leo > I never actually use it. -- Wayne Boatwright (correct the spelling of "geemail" to reply) ************************************************** ********************** Date: Saturday, 01(I)/10(X)/09(MMIX) ************************************************** ********************** Countdown till Martin Luther King, Jr. Day 1wks 1dys 23hrs 33mins ************************************************** ********************** I am in total control, but don't tell my cat. ************************************************** ********************** |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 10 Jan 2009 07:05:30 GMT, Wayne Boatwright
> wrote: > > >FTM = for that matter Thanks for the edumacation. I don't recall seeing that string of letters before. ![]() -- I never worry about diets. The only carrots that interest me are the number of carats in a diamond. Mae West |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat 10 Jan 2009 01:03:11a, sf told us...
> On Sat, 10 Jan 2009 07:05:30 GMT, Wayne Boatwright > > wrote: >> >> >>FTM = for that matter > > Thanks for the edumacation. I don't recall seeing that string of > letters before. ![]() > > It's probably not used all that often. -- Wayne Boatwright (correct the spelling of "geemail" to reply) ************************************************** ********************** Date: Saturday, 01(I)/10(X)/09(MMIX) ************************************************** ********************** Countdown till Martin Luther King, Jr. Day 1wks 1dys 22hrs 47mins ************************************************** ********************** Call my cat?! No, I just run the can opener... ************************************************** ********************** |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Damsel in dis Dress wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Jan 2009 09:37:25 -0800 (PST), aem > > wrote: > > >>On Jan 8, 10:12 pm, Damsel in dis Dress > >>wrote: >> >>>I found this recipe on the web in 1997, I believe. After a couple >>>years of not keeping track of where I found things (newbie), I traced >>>most of my recipes to their sources. This one, no joy. So my name's >>>on it just so you know where YOU got it. I only wish I could put >>>something this delicious together! >>> >>> Mahogany Chicken Wings >>>...... >>>Place individual chicken pieces on pans and bake, uncovered, for 20 >>>minutes. Remove liquified chicken fat and juices from pan. Turn >>>chicken pieces and baste with marinating sauce. >>> >>>Bake another 20 minutes, turn chicken and baste. Repeat twice more, >>>watching carefully during the last baking cycle, so the sauce doesn't >>>burn. >>>..... >> >>If I'm reading this right that would be 80 minutes at 375F°. Seems >>like a very long time for wiings. -aem > > > It is. It's a very long time. I can't stand the slimy inside of the > skin, and this cooks every remnant of it away. You could cook it less > if you don't share my preferences. This IS the original recipe, > wherever the heck it came from. > > Either way, they're delicious! Carol, I make teriyaki chicken wings that sound vaguely similar. I mix pineapple juice, soy sauce and brown sugar 1:1:1, add crushed garlic, lots of freshly ground black pepper and a splash of sesame oil. The sauce goes into a roasting pan with a single layer of wings and I bake the begezus out of it, stirring occasionally. Usually takes about 80 minutes at 400 for the sauce to get all thick and sticky. Mmm mmm. Sweet and salty and tangy. Serve them with the pineapple alongside. I'm hurting right now. Zane was running around with his ball, hit me behind the knees and down I went. Landed on my ass so hard it gave me a headache. I'm waiting for the ibuprofen to kick in before I try to go back to sleep. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wayne Boatwright wrote:
> On Fri 09 Jan 2009 09:56:43p, Leonard Blaisdell told us... > >> In article 7>, >> Wayne Boatwright > wrote: >> >>> I'm glad to see you using the word "unctuousness". I used it once in >>> here an got slammed for it. >> I just looked it up for food and found out I hadn't really understood >> the social meaning either. I'll struggle with 'sanguine' until the day I >> die. >> >> leo >> > > Well, we could rub a wing or two across our foreheads. :-) > > I could deal with a sanguine steak! > If my steak had a "ruddy" appearance, I'd be worried :-) |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 10 Jan 2009 03:53:55 -0600, Kathleen
> wrote: >Carol, I make teriyaki chicken wings that sound vaguely similar. I mix >pineapple juice, soy sauce and brown sugar 1:1:1, add crushed garlic, >lots of freshly ground black pepper and a splash of sesame oil. > >The sauce goes into a roasting pan with a single layer of wings and I >bake the begezus out of it, stirring occasionally. Usually takes about >80 minutes at 400 for the sauce to get all thick and sticky. > >Mmm mmm. Sweet and salty and tangy. Serve them with the pineapple >alongside. That sounds good! Thanks! >I'm hurting right now. Zane was running around with his ball, hit me >behind the knees and down I went. Landed on my ass so hard it gave me a >headache. I'm waiting for the ibuprofen to kick in before I try to go >back to sleep. Hang in there. I hope the ibuprofen kicks in quickly. Hugs, Carol -- Change "invalid" to JamesBond's agent number to reply. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Wow - these sound like some chicken wings I used to get at a good Chinese resto.. They were ever so delicious and dark. I will def. give this a try when I know I have the time for all that turnin'. Heck, I'm singing "Turn, turn turn" right NOW as I salivate. I think I'll cut the recipe in half tho. 5 dozen is a LOT. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 09 Jan 2009 11:47:09 -0600, Damsel in dis Dress
> wrote: >On Fri, 9 Jan 2009 09:37:25 -0800 (PST), aem > >wrote: >>If I'm reading this right that would be 80 minutes at 375F°. Seems >>like a very long time for wiings. -aem > >It is. It's a very long time. I can't stand the slimy inside of the >skin, and this cooks every remnant of it away. You could cook it less >if you don't share my preferences. This IS the original recipe, >wherever the heck it came from. I also prefer "overcooked" wings. Whenever we get takeout or delivery wings, I order enough to have lunch leftovers. I reheat the leftovers for way too long so that the skin is crunchy and the slipperiness is gone. I like the leftovers better than the fresh wings! Tara |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tara wrote:
> I also prefer "overcooked" wings. Whenever we get takeout or > delivery wings, I order enough to have lunch leftovers. I reheat the > leftovers for way too long so that the skin is crunchy and the > slipperiness is gone. I like the leftovers better than the fresh > wings! > > Tara You could sauce your wings after 45 minutes, then return them to the oven to finish cooking, and to dry them out. Becca |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 10 Jan 2009 20:19:16 -0600, Becca >
wrote: >Tara wrote: > >> I also prefer "overcooked" wings. Whenever we get takeout or >> delivery wings, I order enough to have lunch leftovers. I reheat the >> leftovers for way too long so that the skin is crunchy and the >> slipperiness is gone. I like the leftovers better than the fresh >> wings! >> >> Tara > >You could sauce your wings after 45 minutes, then return them to the >oven to finish cooking, and to dry them out. That Becca. Pure bleepin' genius! Thanks, lady! Carol -- Change "invalid" to JamesBond's agent number to reply. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Damsel in dis Dress wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Jan 2009 20:19:16 -0600, Becca > >> You could sauce your wings after 45 minutes, then return them to the >> oven to finish cooking, and to dry them out. > > That Becca. Pure bleepin' genius! > > Thanks, lady! > Carol As soon as wings go on sale, I am trying that recipe. Thanks for posting it. Becca |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Damsel in dis Dress wrote:
>> You could sauce your wings after 45 minutes, then return them to the >> oven to finish cooking, and to dry them out. > > That Becca. Pure bleepin' genius! > > Thanks, lady! > Carol BTW, I should have mentioned, this is the way my husband cooks them; like Tara, he also likes them dry. Becca |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 10, 11:21*am, Janet Wilder > wrote:
> I'm thinking of doing the same and making them in my new > toaster/convection oven. Since I got that toy, I haven't turned on the > big oven once. Did some searching about conv.ovens and I found this comment - have you used the big oven since you posted this on Jan 10th? I'm thinking that a conv. oven would be good in the summer when I hate to use the biggie. Also, uses less power, don't you think? |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
val189 wrote:
> On Jan 10, 11:21 am, Janet Wilder > wrote: > >> I'm thinking of doing the same and making them in my new >> toaster/convection oven. Since I got that toy, I haven't turned on the >> big oven once. > > > Did some searching about conv.ovens and I found this comment - have > you used the big oven since you posted this on Jan 10th? I'm thinking > that a conv. oven would be good in the summer when I hate to use the > biggie. Also, uses less power, don't you think? I have not used the big oven since I got the TO. It's mostly "summer" here all year long <g> I have used the Kitchen Aide TO on convection to roast veggies and they came out grand. I was really surprised, because it's rather small. I even roasted an eye round of beef successfully in the TO. It also makes great toast <vbg> |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 31 Jan 2009 07:16:58 -0800 (PST), val189
> wrote: >Did some searching about conv.ovens and I found this comment - have >you used the big oven since you posted this on Jan 10th? I'm thinking >that a conv. oven would be good in the summer when I hate to use the >biggie. Also, uses less power, don't you think? Why waste counter space on a big kitchen toy? Sounds like you have an old fashioned non-self cleaning oven that leaks heat like crazy. Update/upgrade your oven! I use mine year round. -- I never worry about diets. The only carrots that interest me are the number of carats in a diamond. Mae West |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
sf wrote:
> On Sat, 31 Jan 2009 07:16:58 -0800 (PST), val189 > > wrote: > >> Did some searching about conv.ovens and I found this comment - have >> you used the big oven since you posted this on Jan 10th? I'm thinking >> that a conv. oven would be good in the summer when I hate to use the >> biggie. Also, uses less power, don't you think? > > Why waste counter space on a big kitchen toy? Sounds like you have an > old fashioned non-self cleaning oven that leaks heat like crazy. > Update/upgrade your oven! I use mine year round. I have plenty of counter space and I love my toy. I have a self-cleaning oven and it's only a few years old. It doesn't leak heat like crazy, but heat comes out of the vents by the range top. The TO is perfect for cooking for two people, IMHO. Why spend the kilowatts to heat a great big oven interior when you are preparing a small amount of food? |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 31 Jan 2009 22:28:23 -0600, Janet Wilder
> wrote: >The TO is perfect for cooking for two people, IMHO. Why spend the >kilowatts to heat a great big oven interior when you are preparing a >small amount of food? For me, what you consider a toaster oven is just a pint sized real oven and if your new oven is new what you expend in energy and $$ is insignificant to heat a real oven. My opinion is that your TO probably wastes more energy and money than an up to date/modern oven. -- I never worry about diets. The only carrots that interest me are the number of carats in a diamond. Mae West |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Thai Chicken Wings ( Sukhumvit Soi Five Fried Chicken) | General Cooking | |||
REC - Charliam's Favorite Chicken Wings (Cracklin' Wings) | General Cooking | |||
REC - Mahogany Chicken Wings | General Cooking | |||
Mahogany? | Barbecue |