Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In his speech Obama acknowledged the contributions of Christians,
Muslims, Jews, Hindus, and non-believers. I believe he failed to include everybody! S. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Steve Pope wrote: > In his speech Obama acknowledged the contributions of Christians, > Muslims, Jews, Hindus, and non-believers. > > I believe he failed to include everybody! Wicca is just a st00pid New Age "affectation", Steve...only dolts (like loser *******s) take it at all seriously. -- Best Greg |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gregory Morrow > wrote:
>Steve Pope wrote: [snip] Okay, I should put a lid on the off-topic posting....sorry. S. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 00:10:39 +0000 (UTC),
(Steve Pope) wrote: >I believe he failed to include everybody! Move to Uganda. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Steve Pope" > wrote in message
... > In his speech Obama acknowledged the contributions of Christians, > Muslims, Jews, Hindus, and non-believers. > > I believe he failed to include everybody! I noticed that also...I was thinking pagans, satanists, christian scientists, Mormoms,... He only named the major religions. Marie |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
MarieD wrote:
> "Steve Pope" > wrote in message > ... >> In his speech Obama acknowledged the contributions of Christians, >> Muslims, Jews, Hindus, and non-believers. >> >> I believe he failed to include everybody! > > I noticed that also...I was thinking pagans, satanists, christian > scientists, Mormoms,... He only named the major religions. > Marie I believe the last two on your list are also Christians, maybe not mainstream in some cases but otherwise still Christians. At least the ones I've met have been. Don't know any satanists, know a few pagans, which what Wiccans are too. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 20, 6:10*pm, (Steve Pope) wrote:
> In his speech Obama acknowledged the contributions of Christians, > Muslims, Jews, Hindus, and non-believers. > > I believe he failed to include everybody! > > S. ======================================= Yes, Steve, he did: Bahais, Buddhists, Wiccans, Zoroastrians, Jains, Santarians, Condomble, Mormons . . . just to name a few. And you're not anymore OT than a lot of the rest of us. Stick it and shut up Morrow. As they say, some of my best friends are . . . fill in the blank. Lynn in Fargo Teacher of Comparative Religion |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Steve Pope wrote:
> In his speech Obama acknowledged the contributions of Christians, > Muslims, Jews, Hindus, and non-believers. > > I believe he failed to include everybody! > > S. Scientologists? Ba'hai? Shintoists? How long a list did you want? gp |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Steve Pope wrote:
> Gregory Morrow > wrote: > > >>Steve Pope wrote: > > > [snip] > > Okay, I should put a lid on the off-topic posting....sorry. > > > S. You dont need to apologize. This 'morrow' on the other hand.... -- JL |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Dan Abel wrote: > > In article >, "MarieD" > > wrote: > > > "Steve Pope" > wrote in message > > ... > > > In his speech Obama acknowledged the contributions of Christians, > > > Muslims, Jews, Hindus, and non-believers. > > > > > > I believe he failed to include everybody! > > > > I noticed that also...I was thinking pagans, satanists, christian > > scientists, Mormoms,... He only named the major religions. > > There are a lot of religions practiced in the US. He didn't have time > (and the nation didn't have the patience) to name every one. > While it certainly would not have been practical to try to list all known superstitions (religions), he should have included something like "...and others" to be all inclusive. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Pete C. > wrote:
>Dan Abel wrote: >> There are a lot of religions practiced in the US. He didn't have time >> (and the nation didn't have the patience) to name every one. >While it certainly would not have been practical to try to list all >known superstitions (religions), he should have included something like >"...and others" to be all inclusive. Yes, he could have done that, and he could have given some sort of explicit nod to Native Americans many of whom practice their native religions. Instead he went on and on about the founding fathers etc. Steve |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Joseph Littleshoes wrote: > Steve Pope wrote: > > > Gregory Morrow > wrote: > > > > > >>Steve Pope wrote: > > > > > > [snip] > > > > Okay, I should put a lid on the off-topic posting....sorry. > > > > > > S. > > You dont need to apologize. But YOU do, you post "OT" shit ALL the time without the "OT" in yer subject line...and the krap you post is not even the *least* bit interesting, either, even the food - related stuff. > This 'morrow' on the other hand.... Steve Pope is a good regular here, I give him a break and in any case my silly comments were about silly "Wiccans", *not* anything about him posting "OT"... Now come over here, Joseph Too - Tight Shoes, I've got a dunking device so's we can dunk you under FREEZING Lake Michigan for a few hours to see if you are a "witch". If ya float ya "pass", if ya sink ya GO TO HELL... Burn, Witchie - Poo Joseph, BURN...!!! BWAHAHAAAAAAA......!!!!!! Lol... -- Best Greg |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Lynn from Fargo wrote: On Jan 20, 6:10 pm, (Steve Pope) wrote: > In his speech Obama acknowledged the contributions of Christians, > Muslims, Jews, Hindus, and non-believers. > > I believe he failed to include everybody! > > S. ======================================= Yes, Steve, he did: Bahais, Buddhists, Wiccans, Zoroastrians, Jains, Santarians, Condomble, Mormons . . . just to name a few. And you're not anymore OT than a lot of the rest of us. Stick it and shut up Morrow. As they say, some of my best friends are . . . fill in the blank. Lynn in Fargo Teacher of Comparative Religion ------------------------ GM replies: "Wicca" is *just* a New Age "fad" thing, Lynn...it wasn't even on the radar until hippies on LSD starting watching _Night Gallery_ in the late 60's...it's like those ridiculous old Roman pagan religions that worship trees and stuff. That said, it's no better or worse than any other "religion", I think trees are wonderful things...so "temple fugit" and all that jazz. ;-p -- Best Greg |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 00:10:39 +0000 (UTC), Steve Pope wrote:
> In his speech Obama acknowledged the contributions of Christians, > Muslims, Jews, Hindus, and non-believers. > > I believe he failed to include everybody! > > S. but mentioning non-believers *is* a step forward. (i wish he'd said 'atheists,' though.) i don't think that happens too often. (yes, i know 'non-believers' would include atheists and agnostics, but i think the word 'atheist' now carries a lot of unnecessary baggage, like the word 'muslim.') your pal, blake |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 20 Jan 2009 19:34:44 -0800, Dan Abel wrote:
> In article >, "MarieD" > > wrote: > >> "Steve Pope" > wrote in message >> ... >>> In his speech Obama acknowledged the contributions of Christians, >>> Muslims, Jews, Hindus, and non-believers. >>> >>> I believe he failed to include everybody! >> >> I noticed that also...I was thinking pagans, satanists, christian >> scientists, Mormoms,... He only named the major religions. > > There are a lot of religions practiced in the US. He didn't have time > (and the nation didn't have the patience) to name every one. > > I'm not sure that the Mormons constitute a separate religion. They > believe the Jesus Christ is the son of God, and the main group call > themselves The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. I would > lump them in with the Christians. many christians don't accept that, and some have their doubts about catholics. your pal, blake |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gregory Morrow wrote:
> Joseph Littleshoes wrote: > > >>Steve Pope wrote: >> >> >>>Gregory Morrow > wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>>Steve Pope wrote: >>> >>> >>>[snip] >>> >>>Okay, I should put a lid on the off-topic posting....sorry. >>> >>> >>>S. >> >>You dont need to apologize. > > > > But YOU do, you post "OT" shit ALL the time without the "OT" in yer subject > line...and the krap you post is not even the *least* bit interesting, > either, even the food - related stuff. > > > >>This 'morrow' on the other hand.... > > > Steve Pope is a good regular here, I give him a break and in any case my > silly comments were about silly "Wiccans", *not* anything about him posting > "OT"... > > Now come over here, Joseph Too - Tight Shoes, I've got a dunking device so's > we can dunk you under FREEZING Lake Michigan for a few hours to see if you > are a "witch". If ya float ya "pass", if ya sink ya GO TO HELL... > > Burn, Witchie - Poo Joseph, BURN...!!! > > BWAHAHAAAAAAA......!!!!!! > > Lol... > > A simple bow is sufficient, no need to grovel when confronted with those people that make you feel so insecure you need to lash out at them over your own paranoia. -- JL |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article >,
Joseph Littleshoes > wrote: > Gregory Morrow wrote: > > Now come over here, Joseph Too - Tight Shoes, I've got a dunking device so's > > we can dunk you under FREEZING Lake Michigan for a few hours to see if you > > are a "witch". If ya float ya "pass", if ya sink ya GO TO HELL... Yah got it backwards, Greg. No need for any device, just some ropes to make sure the accused witch can't cheat by swimming. If the witch doesn't drown, that is proof that she used her witch powers, and so they burn her at the stake. If she drowns, then she must not be a witch, so she will receive her reward in heaven. > A simple bow is sufficient, no need to grovel when confronted with those > people that make you feel so insecure you need to lash out at them over > your own paranoia. -- Dan Abel Petaluma, California USA |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 20 Jan 2009 22:10:21 -0500, "MarieD" > wrote:
>I noticed that also...I was thinking pagans, satanists, christian >scientists, Mormoms,... He only named the major religions. >Marie Where does Santeria fall? |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Jan 2009 22:10:21 -0500, "MarieD" > wrote: > > >>I noticed that also...I was thinking pagans, satanists, christian >>scientists, Mormoms,... He only named the major religions. >>Marie > > > > Where does Santeria fall? ATR? (African Traditional Religion) i could have hoped in such a statement that BHO (cant very well refer to him as BO ![]() included the African Diasporic Religions as practiced by African Americans, conjure, Hoodoo, root work etc. which i understand santeria, candelaria, 7 powers are off shoots of. Though im told that while a potent presence in the African American community it is rarely spoken of to outsiders. http://thehound.net/19931030/mp3s/start06.mp3 http://thehound.net/19870314/mp3s/start41.mp3 http://thehound.net/19870221/mp3s/start60.mp3 -- JL |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 21, 12:06*am, bob > wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 00:10:39 +0000 (UTC), > (Steve Pope) shouted from the highest rooftop: > > >In his speech Obama acknowledged the contributions of Christians, > >Muslims, Jews, Hindus, and non-believers. > > >I believe he failed to include everybody! > > Aren't Wiccans a kind of nut that can be used instead of Pecans? > [Whack!] maxine in ri some of my best friends are [nuts][wiccans][usenet denizens] |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
bob wrote:
>> I believe he failed to include everybody! > > Aren't Wiccans a kind of nut that can be used instead of Pecans? From my limited experience I would tend to agree. I went to a Wiccan wedding 6 years ago. It was held ion Friday the 13th... on purpose. It started off about an hour and half late because the guy officiating forgot his broom. That was just as well because most of the guests were more than an hour late arriving. The officiator was all decked out in Indian buckskins and spent more time talking about himself than the about the service or the bride and groom. I don't know why they could not have used a broom from the janitor's closet at the hall, but apparently his had some special significance. The ceremony involved binding the bride and grooms hands with about a dozen different coloured strings, each supposedly having some special significance. Then they had to jump over a sword and a broom. It was an experience. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave Smith wrote:
> bob wrote: > >>> I believe he failed to include everybody! >> >> Aren't Wiccans a kind of nut that can be used instead of Pecans? > > > From my limited experience I would tend to agree. I went to a Wiccan > wedding 6 years ago. It was held ion Friday the 13th... on purpose. It > started off about an hour and half late because the guy officiating > forgot his broom. That was just as well because most of the guests were > more than an hour late arriving. The officiator was all decked out in > Indian buckskins and spent more time talking about himself than the > about the service or the bride and groom. I don't know why they could > not have used a broom from the janitor's closet at the hall, but > apparently his had some special significance. > > The ceremony involved binding the bride and grooms hands with about a > dozen different coloured strings, each supposedly having some special > significance. Then they had to jump over a sword and a broom. It was an > experience. That sounds more like a college fraternity initiation than a wedding. (re they still married? Inquiring minds and all that.... gloria p |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
maxine in ri wrote:
> On Jan 21, 12:06�am, bob > wrote: > >>On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 00:10:39 +0000 (UTC), >>(Steve Pope) shouted from the highest rooftop: >> >> >>>In his speech Obama acknowledged the contributions of Christians, >>>Muslims, Jews, Hindus, and non-believers. >> >>>I believe he failed to include everybody! >> >>Aren't Wiccans a kind of nut that can be used instead of Pecans? >> > > [Whack!] > > maxine in ri > > some of my best friends are [nuts][wiccans][usenet denizens] *snap!* all that and a bag of chips! Louis Jordan - Somebody Hoodoo'ed the Hoodoo Man http://thehound.net/19870314/mp3s/start41.mp3 -- J (obligatory emoticon ![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave Smith wrote:
> bob wrote: > >>> I believe he failed to include everybody! >> >> Aren't Wiccans a kind of nut that can be used instead of Pecans? > > > From my limited experience I would tend to agree. I went to a Wiccan > wedding 6 years ago. It was held ion Friday the 13th... on purpose. It > started off about an hour and half late because the guy officiating > forgot his broom. That was just as well because most of the guests were > more than an hour late arriving. The officiator was all decked out in > Indian buckskins and spent more time talking about himself than the > about the service or the bride and groom. I don't know why they could > not have used a broom from the janitor's closet at the hall, but > apparently his had some special significance. > > The ceremony involved binding the bride and grooms hands with about a > dozen different coloured strings, each supposedly having some special > significance. Then they had to jump over a sword and a broom. It was an > experience. I just noticed that you can join "bride" and "groom" contain, in order, "broom". That's all I have to add. Carry on. -- Blinky Killing all posts from Google Groups - The Usenet Improvement Project: http://improve-usenet.org |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gloria P wrote:
> >> The ceremony involved binding the bride and grooms hands with about a >> dozen different coloured strings, each supposedly having some special >> significance. Then they had to jump over a sword and a broom. It was >> an experience. > > > That sounds more like a college fraternity initiation than a wedding. > (re they still married? Inquiring minds and all that.... Much to the surprise of the groom's parents they are still together..... 6 years now. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
maxine in ri wrote:
> On Jan 21, 12:06�am, bob > wrote: > >>On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 00:10:39 +0000 (UTC), >>(Steve Pope) shouted from the highest rooftop: >> >> >>>In his speech Obama acknowledged the contributions of Christians, >>>Muslims, Jews, Hindus, and non-believers. >> >>>I believe he failed to include everybody! >> >>Aren't Wiccans a kind of nut that can be used instead of Pecans? >> > > [Whack!] > > maxine in ri > > some of my best friends are [nuts][wiccans][usenet denizens] *snap!* all that and a bag of chips! http://www.bu.edu/av/musiclibrary/FA...-Section_3.mp3 -- J (obligatory emoticon ![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article .net>,
Blinky the Shark > wrote: > I just noticed that you can join "bride" and "groom" contain, in order, > "broom". That's all I have to add. Carry on. Or "morbid ogre" if you mix all the letters and only reference the bride ![]() leo |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Leonard Blaisdell wrote:
> In article .net>, > Blinky the Shark > wrote: > >> I just noticed that you can join "bride" and "groom" contain, in order, >> "broom". That's all I have to add. Carry on. > > Or "morbid ogre" if you mix all the letters and only reference the bride > ![]() Or "bridge room" if you want to refer to part of a ship and really sound like a land lubber. I suppose a "bridge moor" could be a troll. -- Blinky Killing all posts from Google Groups - The Usenet Improvement Project: http://improve-usenet.org |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article .net>,
Blinky the Shark > wrote: > I suppose a "bridge moor" could be a troll. I thought El Cid wiped bridge moors out but google doesn't confirm. At the least, a bridge moor in Spain would demand a toll. I'd bet on it. leo |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 19:29:43 -0800, Joseph Littleshoes wrote:
> maxine in ri wrote: >> On Jan 21, 12:06�am, bob > wrote: >> >>>On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 00:10:39 +0000 (UTC), >>>(Steve Pope) shouted from the highest rooftop: >>> >>> >>>>In his speech Obama acknowledged the contributions of Christians, >>>>Muslims, Jews, Hindus, and non-believers. >>> >>>>I believe he failed to include everybody! >>> >>>Aren't Wiccans a kind of nut that can be used instead of Pecans? >>> >> >> [Whack!] >> >> maxine in ri >> >> some of my best friends are [nuts][wiccans][usenet denizens] > > *snap!* all that and a bag of chips! > > Louis Jordan - Somebody Hoodoo'ed the Hoodoo Man > > http://thehound.net/19870314/mp3s/start41.mp3 not my favorite of his, but louis jordan was a very entertaining fellow. everyone should run right out and get this: <http://www.amazon.com/Best-Louis-Jordan/dp/B000002O17/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=music&qid=1232641772&sr= 8-1> it's cheap, too! your pal, blake |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"New Age"? That's funny....since it precedes Christianity by a few
thousand years. I'll tell you what's a "a st00pid "affectation" tho. Spelling "stupid", "st00pid". Jesus...If you had a Smiley Face key on yout KB....you'd have used it for the O's, wouldnt you? What are you? 14? and let me guess....a "loser *******" would be....any woman who doesnt want to sleep with you? Lass What about Wiccans? Group: rec.food.cooking Date: Tue, Jan 20, 2009, 6:30pm (EST-1) From: (Gregory*Morrow) Steve Pope wrote: In his speech Obama acknowledged the contributions of Christians, Muslims, Jews, Hindus, and non-believers. I believe he failed to include everybody! Wicca is just a st00pid New Age "affectation", Steve...only dolts (like loser *******s) take it at all seriously. -- Best Greg |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Santeria got left out...along with Vodoo Obeiah, Macumba...
Which is really sad, considering his dad's roots. Lass What about Wiccans? Group: rec.food.cooking Date: Wed, Jan 21, 2009, 3:25pm (EST-1) From: On Tue, 20 Jan 2009 22:10:21 -0500, "MarieD" > wrote: I noticed that also...I was thinking pagans, satanists, christian scientists, Mormoms,... He only named the major religions. Marie Where does Santeria fall? |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 22, 11:02*am, (Lass Chance_2) wrote:
> Santeria got left out...along with Vodoo Obeiah, Macumba... > > Which is really sad, considering his dad's roots. > > Lass > > What about Wiccans? * > > Group: rec.food.cooking Date: Wed, Jan 21, 2009, 3:25pm (EST-1) From: > Tue, 20 Jan 2009 22:10:21 -0500, "MarieD" > wrote: > > I noticed that also...I was thinking pagans, satanists, christian > scientists, Mormoms,... He only named the major religions. Marie > Where does Santeria fall? * ================================================= I named Santeria and Condomble but left out Vodun et al. Lynn in Fargo There is nothing more fascinating than what different cultures eat except what they worship. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 11:10:52 -0800 (PST), Lynn from Fargo
> >> I noticed that also...I was thinking pagans, satanists, christian >> scientists, Mormoms,... He only named the major religions. Marie >> Where does Santeria fall? For that matter, what about UU's or Raellians? Alex, tounge planted firmly... |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article >,
blake murphy > wrote: > On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 19:29:43 -0800, Joseph Littleshoes wrote: > > > maxine in ri wrote: > snip! > > > > Louis Jordan - Somebody Hoodoo'ed the Hoodoo Man > > > > http://thehound.net/19870314/mp3s/start41.mp3 > > not my favorite of his, but louis jordan was a very entertaining fellow. > > everyone should run right out and get this: > > <http://www.amazon.com/Best-Louis-Jor...s_sr_1?ie=UTF8 > &s=music&qid=1232641772&sr=8-1> > > it's cheap, too! > > your pal, > blake All reet, cats! I'm hep to that jive. ob food: Dig this groovy video of Louis' "Beans And Cornbread" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gV7_2oy8LMY D.M. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 19:07:29 -0800, Don Martinich wrote:
> In article >, > blake murphy > wrote: > >> On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 19:29:43 -0800, Joseph Littleshoes wrote: >> >>> maxine in ri wrote: >> > snip! >>> >>> Louis Jordan - Somebody Hoodoo'ed the Hoodoo Man >>> >>> http://thehound.net/19870314/mp3s/start41.mp3 >> >> not my favorite of his, but louis jordan was a very entertaining fellow. >> >> everyone should run right out and get this: >> >> <http://www.amazon.com/Best-Louis-Jor...s_sr_1?ie=UTF8 >> &s=music&qid=1232641772&sr=8-1> >> >> it's cheap, too! >> >> your pal, >> blake > > All reet, cats! I'm hep to that jive. ob food: Dig this groovy video of > Louis' "Beans And Cornbread" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gV7_2oy8LMY > > D.M. well, that's certainly on-topic. i like this one, 'beware': <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=owqLjzTu3SA> your pal, blake |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|