I now have 449 e mail addresses in my killfile. Of that, over 125 comes
from this group-whether it be the trolls, the crossposters with messages of
hate or the selling of 'handbags' or some such.

I have to wonder why this group specifically seems to attract the idiots
more so than other discussion groups. Any thoughts?

Kswck wrote:

> I now have 449 e mail addresses in my killfile. Of that, over 125 comes
> from this group-whether it be the trolls, the crossposters with messages
of
> hate or the selling of 'handbags' or some such.
>
> I have to wonder why this group specifically seems to attract the idiots
> more so than other discussion groups. Any thoughts?


A lot of the idiots were pulled in here by Master Idiot Peter Lucas last
month...there were/are a LOT of them. Then there are the rfc idiots
(Omelet, Wayne Boatwright, amongst others) who thought that Lucas was a
"nice guy" and so "fed the fire", so to speak...so killfiling *them* got rid
of a lot of the Lucas garbage. There are a few who x-post from the uk
food - drink group, these are pretty much all useless idjits...

There is still a lot of commercial spam, althoug killfiling the gmail domain
helps somewhat...others killfile all posts emanating from Goggle. And
hopefully with the US political scene settling down we'll see less of the
x-posted political trolls...

HTH

FWIW


--
Best
Greg

Kswck wrote:
> I now have 449 e mail addresses in my killfile. Of that, over 125 comes
> from this group-whether it be the trolls, the crossposters with messages of
> hate or the selling of 'handbags' or some such.
>
> I have to wonder why this group specifically seems to attract the idiots
> more so than other discussion groups. Any thoughts?
>
>
High traffic newsgroup, attracts spammers, trolls, weirdos, and nitwits.

Kswck wrote:

> I now have 449 e mail addresses in my killfile. Of that, over 125 comes
> from this group-whether it be the trolls, the crossposters with messages
> of hate or the selling of 'handbags' or some such.

So with that many killfiles being required for filtering on addresses,
perhaps you can see that there's a more efficient way.


--
Blinky
Killing all posts from Google Groups -
The Usenet Improvement Project: http://improve-usenet.org

George Shirley wrote:

> Kswck wrote:
>> I now have 449 e mail addresses in my killfile. Of that, over 125 comes
>> from this group-whether it be the trolls, the crossposters with messages
>> of hate or the selling of 'handbags' or some such.
>>
>> I have to wonder why this group specifically seems to attract the idiots
>> more so than other discussion groups. Any thoughts?
>>
>>
> High traffic newsgroup, attracts spammers, trolls, weirdos, and nitwits.

A newsgroup, attracts spammers and losers from Google Groups.

--
Blinky
Killing all posts from Google Groups -
The Usenet Improvement Project: http://improve-usenet.org

On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 15:38:34 -0500, "Kswck" >
shouted from the highest rooftop:

>I now have 449 e mail addresses in my killfile. Of that, over 125 comes
>from this group-whether it be the trolls, the crossposters with messages of
>hate or the selling of 'handbags' or some such.
>
>I have to wonder why this group specifically seems to attract the idiots
>more so than other discussion groups. Any thoughts?

It's not just this newsgroup. And you'll notice that Most of the spam
& trolls come from people using google.groups instead of a Usenet news
service. The problem could be solved in a instant if legitimate
posters would stop using google.groups and use a proper news
client/server.

And yes. I could filter out all google.group posts. But because quite
a few of the regular contributors here - and other ng's - stoop to
using google.groups, I would miss some valuable posts. Why people
continue to use google.groups when there are far better alternatives
available is beyond my understanding.


--

una cerveza mas por favor ...

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~
Wax-up and drop-in of Surfing's Golden Years: <http://www.surfwriter.net>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~

On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 15:38:34 -0500, "Kswck" >
wrote:

>Any thoughts?

Yes...the subject just was added to the killfile!

"Gregory Morrow" > wrote in
:

>
> Kswck wrote:
>
>> I now have 449 e mail addresses in my killfile. Of that, over 125
>> comes from this group-whether it be the trolls, the crossposters with
>> messages
> of
>> hate or the selling of 'handbags' or some such.
>>
>> I have to wonder why this group specifically seems to attract the
>> idiots more so than other discussion groups. Any thoughts?
>
>
> A lot of the idiots were pulled in here by Master Idiot Peter Lucas
> last month...there were/are a LOT of them.



You're living up to your name, moron morrow.


There are *3* (three) stalker/trolls.

Putz (aka pits)
'hey-zues'
kirkland........ who is the pathetic asswipe who makes up many. *many*
fake ID's, in the vain hope that someone will talk to it.


Now go crawl back into your hole, you moron.


--
Peter Lucas
Brisbane
Australia


"And where is the Prince who can afford to so cover his country with
troops for its defense, as that ten thousand men descending from the
clouds, might not in many places do an infinite deal of mischief, before
a force could be brought together to repel them?"

Benjamin Franklin 1748

Blinky the Shark > wrote in
news
> George Shirley wrote:
>
>> Kswck wrote:
>>> I now have 449 e mail addresses in my killfile. Of that, over 125
>>> comes from this group-whether it be the trolls, the crossposters
>>> with messages of hate or the selling of 'handbags' or some such.
>>>
>>> I have to wonder why this group specifically seems to attract the
>>> idiots more so than other discussion groups. Any thoughts?
>>>
>>>
>> High traffic newsgroup, attracts spammers, trolls, weirdos, and
>> nitwits.
>
> A newsgroup, attracts spammers and losers from Google Groups.
>



I like your .sig, and have bookmarked that page :-)

"Killing all posts from Google Groups -
The Usenet Improvement Project: http://improve-usenet.org"



--
Peter Lucas
Brisbane
Australia


"And where is the Prince who can afford to so cover his country with
troops for its defense, as that ten thousand men descending from the
clouds, might not in many places do an infinite deal of mischief, before
a force could be brought together to repel them?"

Benjamin Franklin 1748

"PeterLucas" > wrote in message
.25...
> "Gregory Morrow" > wrote in
> :
>
>>
>> Kswck wrote:
>>
>>> I now have 449 e mail addresses in my killfile. Of that, over 125
>>> comes from this group-whether it be the trolls, the crossposters with
>>> messages
>> of
>>> hate or the selling of 'handbags' or some such.
>>>
>>> I have to wonder why this group specifically seems to attract the
>>> idiots more so than other discussion groups. Any thoughts?
>>
>>
>> A lot of the idiots were pulled in here by Master Idiot Peter Lucas
>> last month...there were/are a LOT of them.
>
>
>
> You're living up to your name, moron morrow.
>
>
> There are *3* (three) stalker/trolls.
>
> Putz (aka pits)
> 'hey-zues'
> kirkland........ who is the pathetic asswipe who makes up many. *many*
> fake ID's, in the vain hope that someone will talk to it.
>
>
> Now go crawl back into your hole, you moron.
>

Peter Lucas is the moron being discombobulated, non-one else.

"PeterLucas" > wrote in message
.25...
> Blinky the Shark > wrote in
> news >
>> George Shirley wrote:
>>
>>> Kswck wrote:
>>>> I now have 449 e mail addresses in my killfile. Of that, over 125
>>>> comes from this group-whether it be the trolls, the crossposters
>>>> with messages of hate or the selling of 'handbags' or some such.
>>>>
>>>> I have to wonder why this group specifically seems to attract the
>>>> idiots more so than other discussion groups. Any thoughts?
>>>>
>>>>
>>> High traffic newsgroup, attracts spammers, trolls, weirdos, and
>>> nitwits.
>>
>> A newsgroup, attracts spammers and losers from Google Groups.
>>
>
>
>
> I like your .sig, and have bookmarked that page :-)
>
> "Killing all posts from Google Groups -
> The Usenet Improvement Project: http://improve-usenet.org"

Don't killfile all posts from Google Groups - instead simply killfile Peter
Lucas!

claymore wrote:

> Don't killfile all posts from Google Groups - instead simply killfile
> Peter Lucas!

Honeybucket, why aren't YOU ignoring him?

--
Dan Goodman
"I have always depended on the kindness of stranglers."
Tennessee Williams, A Streetcar Named Expire
Journal http://dsgood.livejournal.com
Futures http://clerkfuturist.wordpress.com
Mirror Journal http://dsgood.insanejournal.com
Mirror 2 http://dsgood.wordpress.com
Links http://del.icio.us/dsgood

"Kswck" > wrote in message
...
>I now have 449 e mail addresses in my killfile. Of that, over 125 comes
>from this group-whether it be the trolls, the crossposters with messages of
>hate or the selling of 'handbags' or some such.
>
> I have to wonder why this group specifically seems to attract the idiots
> more so than other discussion groups. Any thoughts?
>

High traffic, of course. I don't bother with the kill file because most
commercial ones never come back again. Easy enough to skip over the thread.

On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 15:38:34 -0500, "Kswck" >
wrote:

>I now have 449 e mail addresses in my killfile. Of that, over 125 comes
>from this group-whether it be the trolls, the crossposters with messages of
>hate or the selling of 'handbags' or some such.
>
Did you count or does your news reader do it for you?

I'd say with 125 it's time to do some quick house cleaning (delete
all) and rebuild! Most, if not all of your filters are probably out
of date or could be revamped to cover more. My kill file is reaching
the house cleaning stage too and I have a fraction of your number.
>
>I have to wonder why this group specifically seems to attract the idiots
>more so than other discussion groups. Any thoughts?

That answer is easy. We have a certain someone they are following.


--
I never worry about diets. The only carrots that
interest me are the number of carats in a diamond.

Mae West

On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 17:29:52 -0500, Mr. Bill > wrote:

>On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 15:38:34 -0500, "Kswck" >
>wrote:
>
>>Any thoughts?
>
>Yes...the subject just was added to the killfile!
>
and if you limit it to a few days after the thread dies, you won't
permanently clutter up your KF.


--
I never worry about diets. The only carrots that
interest me are the number of carats in a diamond.

Mae West

sf > wrote in
:


>>
>>I have to wonder why this group specifically seems to attract the
>>idiots more so than other discussion groups. Any thoughts?
>
> That answer is easy. We have a certain someone they are following.
>
>



And you make it sound like it's my fault.


It is *not* my fault that mental retards, who's lives *completely*
revolve around the person they are stalking, have access to computers.


So what is the solution? Should I cancel my internet access, and never
sign up for access ever again?

Is that what you think will solve the problem?

It won't. All that will happen is the mental retards will find another
victim for their pathetic little games.

--
Peter Lucas
Brisbane
Australia


"And where is the Prince who can afford to so cover his country with
troops for its defense, as that ten thousand men descending from the
clouds, might not in many places do an infinite deal of mischief, before
a force could be brought together to repel them?"

Benjamin Franklin 1748

"PeterLucas" > wrote in message
. 25...
> sf > wrote in
> :
>
>
>>>
>>>I have to wonder why this group specifically seems to attract the
>>>idiots more so than other discussion groups. Any thoughts?
>>
>> That answer is easy. We have a certain someone they are following.
>>
>>
>
>
>
> And you make it sound like it's my fault.
>
>
> It is *not* my fault that mental retards, who's lives *completely*
> revolve around the person they are stalking, have access to computers.
>
>
> So what is the solution? Should I cancel my internet access, and never
> sign up for access ever again?
>
> Is that what you think will solve the problem?
>
> It won't. All that will happen is the mental retards will find another
> victim for their pathetic little games.
>

Where would they find an idiot like Peter Lucas?
No...I think if Lucas went his *mental retards* would go too.

"sf" > wrote in message
...
> On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 15:38:34 -0500, "Kswck" >
> wrote:
>
>>I now have 449 e mail addresses in my killfile. Of that, over 125 comes
>>from this group-whether it be the trolls, the crossposters with messages
>>of
>>hate or the selling of 'handbags' or some such.
>>
> Did you count or does your news reader do it for you?
>
> I'd say with 125 it's time to do some quick house cleaning (delete
> all) and rebuild! Most, if not all of your filters are probably out
> of date or could be revamped to cover more. My kill file is reaching
> the house cleaning stage too and I have a fraction of your number.
>>
>>I have to wonder why this group specifically seems to attract the idiots
>>more so than other discussion groups. Any thoughts?
>
> That answer is easy. We have a certain someone they are following.
>
Yep killfile Peter Lucas' e-mail, that should do it.

bob wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 15:38:34 -0500, "Kswck" >
> shouted from the highest rooftop:
>
>> I now have 449 e mail addresses in my killfile. Of that, over 125 comes
>>from this group-whether it be the trolls, the crossposters with messages of
>> hate or the selling of 'handbags' or some such.
>>
>> I have to wonder why this group specifically seems to attract the idiots
>> more so than other discussion groups. Any thoughts?
>
> It's not just this newsgroup. And you'll notice that Most of the spam
> & trolls come from people using google.groups instead of a Usenet news
> service. The problem could be solved in a instant if legitimate
> posters would stop using google.groups and use a proper news
> client/server.
>
> And yes. I could filter out all google.group posts. But because quite
> a few of the regular contributors here - and other ng's - stoop to
> using google.groups, I would miss some valuable posts. Why people
> continue to use google.groups when there are far better alternatives
> available is beyond my understanding.
Some ISP's do not have usenet feeds
More than a few posters have jobs that take them away from home base
and Google is a cheap and effective means of reading newsgroups

To filter all things from google perhaps you have missed out on some
great posts / ?

On Jan 22, 7:46*am, PeterLucas > wrote:
> "Gregory Morrow" > wrote :
>
>
>
> > Kswck wrote:
>
> >> I now have 449 e mail addresses in my killfile. *Of that, over 125
> >> comes from this group-whether it be the trolls, the crossposters with
> >> messages
> > of
> >> hate or the selling of 'handbags' or some such.
>
> >> I have to wonder why this group specifically seems to attract the
> >> idiots more so than other discussion groups. Any thoughts?
>
> > A lot of the idiots were pulled in here by Master Idiot Peter Lucas
> > last month...there were/are a LOT of them. *
>
> You're living up to your name, moron morrow.
>
> There are *3* (three) stalker/trolls.
>
> Putz (aka pits)

*** OI Back Off -----------

And you wonder why folks have a swipe at you ---------
It appears (to me) that you keep inviting the trouble with posts
such as this .

About 99% of the time I ignore you even when you keep taking pot
shots at me such as this .

I also notice that you have not taken up the offer of a face to
face - Thus proving the contention contained in many posts
that you are full of wind and just all bluff bluster.

Unlike others I only post either my own initials or with the preface
of pits in most NG.s
Thus allowing your infamous kill files to work .

Give it a break will you !

You and most with a working brain cell should know you bought all the
strife upon yourself
over many years of stalking Faking your own trolls etc In effect
talking and mailing yourself.
Then the real identities you assumed arc up at you and you wonder
why . Hells bells Pete
go have a good look at yourself for your own and every ones sanity .




> 'hey-zues'
> kirkland........ who is the pathetic asswipe who makes up many. *many*
> fake ID's, in the vain hope that someone will talk to it.
>
> Now go crawl back into your hole, you moron.
>
> --
> Peter Lucas
> Brisbane
> Australia

PhilC > wrote in
:

> bob wrote:
>> On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 15:38:34 -0500, "Kswck" >
>> shouted from the highest rooftop:
>>
>>> I now have 449 e mail addresses in my killfile. Of that, over 125
>>> comes
>>>from this group-whether it be the trolls, the crossposters with
>>>messages of
>>> hate or the selling of 'handbags' or some such.
>>>
>>> I have to wonder why this group specifically seems to attract the
>>> idiots more so than other discussion groups. Any thoughts?
>>
>> It's not just this newsgroup. And you'll notice that Most of the spam
>> & trolls come from people using google.groups instead of a Usenet
>> news service. The problem could be solved in a instant if legitimate
>> posters would stop using google.groups and use a proper news
>> client/server.
>>
>> And yes. I could filter out all google.group posts. But because quite
>> a few of the regular contributors here - and other ng's - stoop to
>> using google.groups, I would miss some valuable posts. Why people
>> continue to use google.groups when there are far better alternatives
>> available is beyond my understanding.
> Some ISP's do not have usenet feeds
> More than a few posters have jobs that take them away from home base
> and Google is a cheap and effective means of reading newsgroups
>
> To filter all things from google perhaps you have missed out on some
> great posts / ?



Nope.

--
Peter Lucas
Brisbane
Australia


"And where is the Prince who can afford to so cover his country with
troops for its defense, as that ten thousand men descending from the
clouds, might not in many places do an infinite deal of mischief, before
a force could be brought together to repel them?"

Benjamin Franklin 1748

PhilC wrote:

> bob wrote:
>> On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 15:38:34 -0500, "Kswck" >
>> shouted from the highest rooftop:
>>
>>> I now have 449 e mail addresses in my killfile. Of that, over 125
>>> comes
>>>from this group-whether it be the trolls, the crossposters with messages
>>>of
>>> hate or the selling of 'handbags' or some such.
>>>
>>> I have to wonder why this group specifically seems to attract the
>>> idiots more so than other discussion groups. Any thoughts?
>>
>> It's not just this newsgroup. And you'll notice that Most of the spam &
>> trolls come from people using google.groups instead of a Usenet news
>> service. The problem could be solved in a instant if legitimate posters
>> would stop using google.groups and use a proper news client/server.
>>
>> And yes. I could filter out all google.group posts. But because quite a
>> few of the regular contributors here - and other ng's - stoop to using
>> google.groups, I would miss some valuable posts. Why people continue to
>> use google.groups when there are far better alternatives available is
>> beyond my understanding.
> Some ISP's do not have usenet feeds

So what? There are still real news feeds - some free - that are not
ISP-provided; Google Groups is not required.


--
Blinky
Killing all posts from Google Groups -
The Usenet Improvement Project: http://improve-usenet.org

Blinky the Shark wrote:
> PhilC wrote:
>
>>
>> Some ISP's do not have usenet feeds
>
> So what? There are still real news feeds - some free - that are not
> ISP-provided; Google Groups is not required.
>
>
Hello Mr Shark
You mean like the one carrying this post

Ot but here is a pic of one of your relatives

http://www.weblite.com.au/template/f.../wobbygong.jpg

Also a Gummy
http://www.austmus.gov.au/fishes/fis...stelushead.jpg

More people in oz have been "bitten" by a gummy than any other shark
species it is reported.

Cheers

On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 22:46:36 +0000 (UTC), in rec.food.cooking, PeterLucas
wrote:

> "Gregory Morrow" > wrote in
> :
>
>>
>> Kswck wrote:
>>
>>> I now have 449 e mail addresses in my killfile. Of that, over 125
>>> comes from this group-whether it be the trolls, the crossposters with
>>> messages
>> of
>>> hate or the selling of 'handbags' or some such.
>>>
>>> I have to wonder why this group specifically seems to attract the
>>> idiots more so than other discussion groups. Any thoughts?
>>
>> A lot of the idiots were pulled in here by Master Idiot Peter Lucas
>> last month...there were/are a LOT of them.
>
> You're living up to your name, moron morrow.
>
> There are *3* (three) stalker/trolls.
>
> Putz (aka pits)
> 'hey-zues'
> kirkland........ who is the pathetic asswipe who makes up many. *many*
> fake ID's, in the vain hope that someone will talk to it.
>
> Now go crawl back into your hole, you moron.

As usual you don't know shit Lucas. Your problem is that you can't see
everyone already knows what a fraud you are. You don't need help from
anyone to prove what a freak you are.

On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 04:13:39 +0000 (UTC), in rec.food.cooking, PeterLucas
wrote:

> sf > wrote in
> :
>
>>>
>>>I have to wonder why this group specifically seems to attract the
>>>idiots more so than other discussion groups. Any thoughts?
>>
>> That answer is easy. We have a certain someone they are following.
>>
>
> And you make it sound like it's my fault.

It is your fault. The past always catches up Peter. Always.

>
> It is *not* my fault that mental retards, who's lives *completely*
> revolve around the person they are stalking, have access to computers.

Now you're upset that the people you have tormented in the past have caught
up with you. You love to dish it but you can't take it, can you Peter?


>
> So what is the solution? Should I cancel my internet access, and never
> sign up for access ever again?

All in Cyberspace would hail you a hero should you decide to leave forever.
The day you pull the plug will be forever known as "Lucas Day" in
Cyberspace. When you leave the alien groupies you have accumulated will
follow you.

>
> Is that what you think will solve the problem?

Absolutely!

>
> It won't. All that will happen is the mental retards will find another
> victim for their pathetic little games.

You would know a lot about those "pathetic little games", wouldn't you
Peter?

On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 14:37:58 +0900, PhilC >
shouted from the highest rooftop:

>> And yes. I could filter out all google.group posts. But because quite
>> a few of the regular contributors here - and other ng's - stoop to
>> using google.groups, I would miss some valuable posts. Why people
>> continue to use google.groups when there are far better alternatives
>> available is beyond my understanding.
>
>
>Some ISP's do not have usenet feeds
>More than a few posters have jobs that take them away from home base
>and Google is a cheap and effective means of reading newsgroups

Using Google to *read* newsgroups isn't a problem, except for the one
doing the reading because the Google interface is such a dog.

It's using Google to *post* to newsgroups that's the problem, because:

1. Most, if not ALL of newsgroup spam & trolls is sent via Goggle.

2. Google doesn't make it easy to snip, so replies contain all of the
text from the previous post.

3. Most of the legitimate posters who use Google don't know, let alone
respect Usenet etiquette.

Besides, there are a number of options available besides Google
Groups, whether you're at home, on the road or using someone else's
computer. Google is simply the lazy person's option ...

>To filter all things from google perhaps you have missed out on some
>great posts / ?

Didn't you read my last paragraph?


--

una cerveza mas por favor ...

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~
Wax-up and drop-in of Surfing's Golden Years: <http://www.surfwriter.net>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~

bob wrote:

> On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 14:37:58 +0900, PhilC >
> shouted from the highest rooftop:

>>Some ISP's do not have usenet feeds

> Using Google to *read* newsgroups isn't a problem, except for the one
> doing the reading because the Google interface is such a dog.

Good luck. You're dealing with someone who thinks it's only ISPs that
offer news feeds. Duh.


--
Blinky
Killing all posts from Google Groups -
The Usenet Improvement Project: http://improve-usenet.org

On Fri, 23 Jan 2009 23:12:22 -0800, Blinky the Shark
> wrote:

>bob wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 14:37:58 +0900, PhilC >
>> shouted from the highest rooftop:
>
>>>Some ISP's do not have usenet feeds
>
>> Using Google to *read* newsgroups isn't a problem, except for the one
>> doing the reading because the Google interface is such a dog.
>
>Good luck. You're dealing with someone who thinks it's only ISPs that
>offer news feeds. Duh.

New users are not as "educated" as you are about usenet.


--
I never worry about diets. The only carrots that
interest me are the number of carats in a diamond.

Mae West

sf wrote:

> On Fri, 23 Jan 2009 23:12:22 -0800, Blinky the Shark >
> wrote:
>
>>bob wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 14:37:58 +0900, PhilC >
>>> shouted from the highest rooftop:
>>
>>>>Some ISP's do not have usenet feeds
>>
>>> Using Google to *read* newsgroups isn't a problem, except for the one
>>> doing the reading because the Google interface is such a dog.
>>
>>Good luck. You're dealing with someone who thinks it's only ISPs that
>>offer news feeds. Duh.
>
> New users are not as "educated" as you are about usenet.

Neither are many old users.

--
Blinky
Killing all posts from Google Groups -
The Usenet Improvement Project: http://improve-usenet.org

On Fri, 23 Jan 2009 23:12:22 -0800, Blinky the Shark
> shouted from the highest rooftop:

>bob wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 14:37:58 +0900, PhilC >
>> shouted from the highest rooftop:
>
>>>Some ISP's do not have usenet feeds
>
>> Using Google to *read* newsgroups isn't a problem, except for the one
>> doing the reading because the Google interface is such a dog.
>
>Good luck. You're dealing with someone who thinks it's only ISPs that
>offer news feeds. Duh.

Duh indeed!

Ignorance is the coin of the masses ... and some are richer than
others.


--

una cerveza mas por favor ...

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~
Wax-up and drop-in of Surfing's Golden Years: <http://www.surfwriter.net>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~

bob wrote:
>
> Ignorance is the coin of the masses ... and some are richer than
> others.

I love that. Please may I steal/borrow it?

On Sun, 25 Jan 2009 08:15:35 -0000, "Ophelia" >
shouted from the highest rooftop:

>bob wrote:
>>
>> Ignorance is the coin of the masses ... and some are richer than
>> others.
>
>I love that. Please may I steal/borrow it?

Thank you ...


--

una cerveza mas por favor ...

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~
Wax-up and drop-in of Surfing's Golden Years: <http://www.surfwriter.net>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~

sf > wrote in news:97lmn4t3im0v6dmb77q1h3msghmbvhk036@
4ax.com:

> New users are not as "educated" as you are about usenet.

It's not like nobody ever tried to teach you, is it?

On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 15:38:34 -0500, Kswck wrote:

> I now have 449 e mail addresses in my killfile. Of that, over 125 comes
> from this group-whether it be the trolls, the crossposters with messages
> of hate or the selling of 'handbags' or some such.
>
> I have to wonder why this group specifically seems to attract the idiots
> more so than other discussion groups. Any thoughts?

Yes, I do. It doesnt. You are wrong.

On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 04:13:39 +0000, PeterLucas wrote:

> sf > wrote in
> :
>
>
>
>>>I have to wonder why this group specifically seems to attract the
>>>idiots more so than other discussion groups. Any thoughts?
>>
>> That answer is easy. We have a certain someone they are following.
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> And you make it sound like it's my fault.

Of course, it IS your fault peter.

> It is *not* my fault

Of course it IS.

> that mental retards, who's lives *completely*
> revolve around the person they are stalking, have access to computers.
>
>
> So what is the solution? Should I cancel my internet access, and never
> sign up for access ever again?

Yup. Only way you will be rid of us, except for in the real world of
course.

> Is that what you think will solve the problem?

In one fell swoop it would.

> It won't. All that will happen is the mental retards will find another
> victim for their pathetic little games.

Nope - you've seriously ****ed off a LOT of people over the years lucas.
Now you think you can simply run away from all the threats of violence
and litigation, not to mention the occaisonal death threat? **** OFF ****
- you can FORGET about getting any peace online ever again. It ain't
gonna happen!

Please give it a rest Mate.


"Jeßus" > wrote in message
...
> On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 04:13:39 +0000, PeterLucas wrote:
>
>> sf > wrote in
>> :
>>
>>
>>
>>>>I have to wonder why this group specifically seems to attract the
>>>>idiots more so than other discussion groups. Any thoughts?
>>>
>>> That answer is easy. We have a certain someone they are following.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> And you make it sound like it's my fault.
>
> Of course, it IS your fault peter.
>
>> It is *not* my fault
>
> Of course it IS.
>
>> that mental retards, who's lives *completely*
>> revolve around the person they are stalking, have access to computers.
>>
>>
>> So what is the solution? Should I cancel my internet access, and never
>> sign up for access ever again?
>
> Yup. Only way you will be rid of us, except for in the real world of
> course.
>
>> Is that what you think will solve the problem?
>
> In one fell swoop it would.
>
>> It won't. All that will happen is the mental retards will find another
>> victim for their pathetic little games.
>
> Nope - you've seriously ****ed off a LOT of people over the years lucas.
> Now you think you can simply run away from all the threats of violence
> and litigation, not to mention the occaisonal death threat? **** OFF ****
> - you can FORGET about getting any peace online ever again. It ain't
> gonna happen!
>
>
>
>
>

On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 12:16:16 +0000, The Old Bloke wrote:

> Please give it a rest Mate.

I can't and won't do that, sorry. Just killfile me.




>
>
> "Jeßus" > wrote in message
> ...
>> On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 04:13:39 +0000, PeterLucas wrote:
>>
>>> sf > wrote in
>>> :
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>>I have to wonder why this group specifically seems to attract the
>>>>>idiots more so than other discussion groups. Any thoughts?
>>>>
>>>> That answer is easy. We have a certain someone they are following.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> And you make it sound like it's my fault.
>>
>> Of course, it IS your fault peter.
>>
>>> It is *not* my fault
>>
>> Of course it IS.
>>
>>> that mental retards, who's lives *completely* revolve around the
>>> person they are stalking, have access to computers.
>>>
>>>
>>> So what is the solution? Should I cancel my internet access, and never
>>> sign up for access ever again?
>>
>> Yup. Only way you will be rid of us, except for in the real world of
>> course.
>>
>>> Is that what you think will solve the problem?
>>
>> In one fell swoop it would.
>>
>>> It won't. All that will happen is the mental retards will find another
>>> victim for their pathetic little games.
>>
>> Nope - you've seriously ****ed off a LOT of people over the years
>> lucas. Now you think you can simply run away from all the threats of
>> violence and litigation, not to mention the occaisonal death threat?
>> **** OFF **** - you can FORGET about getting any peace online ever
>> again. It ain't gonna happen!
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>

On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 21:09:28 +0000 (UTC), Jeßus
> shouted from the highest rooftop:

>On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 12:16:16 +0000, The Old Bloke wrote:
>
>> Please give it a rest Mate.
>
>I can't and won't do that, sorry. Just killfile me.

With pleasure.

Ignorance is the coin of the masses ... and some are richer than others.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~
Wax-up and drop-in of Surfing's Golden Years: <http://www.surfwriter.net>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~

Jeßus wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 12:16:16 +0000, The Old Bloke wrote:
>
>> Please give it a rest Mate.
>
> I can't and won't do that, sorry. Just killfile me.

Really and truly you are making a total dick of yourself with all this Lucas
baiting rubbish and crossposting. Goodness knows I have enough reasons to
have a very high dislike of Lucas and I think he's a total bag of excrement.
However I would never lower myself to his level as you've been doing for
months. Your constant baiting and dragging up old posts, makes you look a
bigger fool than Lucas and that is saying something.

On Fri, 30 Jan 2009 08:24:46 +1000, Barbara wrote:

> Jeßus wrote:
>> On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 12:16:16 +0000, The Old Bloke wrote:
>>
>>> Please give it a rest Mate.
>>
>> I can't and won't do that, sorry. Just killfile me.
>
> Really and truly you are making a total dick of yourself with all this
> Lucas baiting rubbish and crossposting. Goodness knows I have enough
> reasons to have a very high dislike of Lucas and I think he's a total
> bag of excrement. However I would never lower myself to his level as
> you've been doing for months. Your constant baiting and dragging up old
> posts, makes you look a bigger fool than Lucas and that is saying
> something.

Hi Babs. How was your trip to Perth? And how's the feline gang?