Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 25, 12:47*pm, ChattyCathy > wrote:
> http://www.recfoodcooking.com > -- > Cheers * > Chatty Cathy Up until 2 years ago, I would have answered "over 20 years" for my microwave's age. If it hadn't cost more for the klystron to be replaced than to buy a new one, I'd still have it<G>. I'm such a profligate. maxine in newton |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article >,
ChattyCathy > wrote: > http://www.recfoodcooking.com Interesting survey, thanks CC! We recently replaced ours. Our first microwave lasted about 15 years. The last 3 have lasted less than 5. I blame the manufacturers! It's why I'm reluctant to replace the kitchen 'frige. It's over 25 years old and still working. Just looks a bit ratty. Things don't last as long as they used to any more! Ours has a turntable and I've no idea if I can switch it off, nor do I care to. Why would you want to turn off the turntable? -- Peace! Om "Any ship can be a minesweeper. Once." -- Anonymous |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"ChattyCathy" > wrote in message
... > http://www.recfoodcooking.com > -- > Cheers > Chatty Cathy I'm not sure I know how to answer this survey so I didn't. MCINL doesn't cover my scenario. I own two microwave ovens; they're in two different kitchens in two different states. And they're vastly different both in functionality/features and age. Jill |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Omelet" > wrote in message
news ![]() > In article >, > ChattyCathy > wrote: > >> http://www.recfoodcooking.com > > Interesting survey, thanks CC! > > We recently replaced ours. Our first microwave lasted about 15 years. > The last 3 have lasted less than 5. I blame the manufacturers! It's > why I'm reluctant to replace the kitchen 'frige. It's over 25 years old > and still working. Just looks a bit ratty. > > Things don't last as long as they used to any more! > > Ours has a turntable and I've no idea if I can switch it off, nor do I > care to. Why would you want to turn off the turntable? > -- > Peace! Om > > "Any ship can be a minesweeper. Once." -- Anonymous I'm afraid that's my doing ![]() dislike my Sharp microwave because I can't turn off the turntable (nor remove it). Sometimes I don't want it to turn. You can't put a rectangular glass baking dish in it that won't turn due to its size, but the turntable won't turn off, either. I bought the cheapest microwave possible at the time. I was paying for moving from a neighborhood that rapidly went downhill. I was dealing with a large monthly rent increase. My safety and peace of mind was worth more than a lousy $200/month more in rent but I did buy a cheap microwave. I've disliked it ever since. Especially the turntable. It's no trouble to turn a pan/bowl/dish yourself, really. Have we really gotten that lazy? Jill |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
jmcquown wrote:
> My safety and peace of mind was worth more than a lousy $200/month > more in rent but I did buy a cheap microwave. > I've disliked it ever since. Especially the > turntable. It's no trouble to turn a pan/bowl/dish yourself, really. > Have we really gotten that lazy? I don't think it's a case of being lazy. IMHO, most MW's I've seen have turntables - and they are part of the design to ensure even cooking. I honestly don't think that turning a pan a few times in the space of 30-35 minutes (if you're cooking that lasagna you mentioned) is really going to give you the same even cooking, unless you're going to turn it manually ever 30 seconds or so, of course. http://www.patentstorm.us/patents/48...scription.html <quote> 2. Background Art Microwaves injected into the interior of a microwave oven rebound about the walls and door of the interior. As a result, the microwaves sometimes interfere with one another to produce cold spots or strengthen one another to produce hot spots. These cold spots and hot spots vary depending upon the cookware inserted into the microwave oven. To compensate for this non-uniformity of energy distribution a number of microwave oven turntables have entered the market. </quote> Or more about it here... http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Why_does_a... er_direction <quote> The turntable in a microwave oven is driven by an alternating current motor which may start in either direction at random and continues to travel in that direction until stopping. The reason for using a turntable in a microwave oven is that the microwave energy is not evenly distributed across the oven. The turntable allows the food to receive an equal amount of energy by turning across the uneven microwave field. The microwave energy is turned to heat within the food. It actually does not matter in which direction the turntable rotates in order to evenly cook the food. </quote> -- Cheers Chatty Cathy |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
ChattyCathy said...
> jmcquown wrote: hello? Hello?? HELLO??? If the pan won't sit within the turntable's diameter, it's safe to assume it will not rotate! Jill's argument is childish stubbornness! Buy a bigger microwave or bake it. Andy A- geometry student |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Andy" > wrote in message ...
> ChattyCathy said... > >> jmcquown wrote: > > hello? I didn't write that. You did. > Hello?? > HELLO??? > > If the pan won't sit within the turntable's diameter, it's safe to assume > it > will not rotate! > a 13X9 glass pan won't fit in a small microwave oven. > Jill's argument is childish stubbornness! > > Buy a bigger microwave or bake it. > Excuse me. But I had a bigger microwave and it died. And when I moved to a much more expensive apartment I couldn't afford a big microwave. So how about YOU get over it? I'm not too lazy to turn a dish a few times in a microwave. Jill |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article >,
"jmcquown" > wrote: > > Ours has a turntable and I've no idea if I can switch it off, nor do I > > care to. Why would you want to turn off the turntable? > > > I'm afraid that's my doing ![]() > dislike my Sharp microwave because I can't turn off the turntable (nor > remove it). Sometimes I don't want it to turn. You can't put a rectangular > glass baking dish in it that won't turn due to its size, but the turntable > won't turn off, either. I bought the cheapest microwave possible at the > time. I was paying for moving from a neighborhood that rapidly went > downhill. I was dealing with a large monthly rent increase. My safety and > peace of mind was worth more than a lousy $200/month more in rent but I did > buy a cheap microwave. I've disliked it ever since. Especially the > turntable. It's no trouble to turn a pan/bowl/dish yourself, really. Have > we really gotten that lazy? > > Jill When I'm lazy enough to use the microwave instead of actually cooking, yes. <g> I mostly use it for warming cooked food, but there are some exceptions... -- Peace! Om "Any ship can be a minesweeper. Once." -- Anonymous |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
jmcquown said...
> "Andy" > wrote in message > ... >> ChattyCathy said... >> >>> jmcquown wrote: >> >> hello? > > I didn't write that. You did. > >> Hello?? >> HELLO??? >> >> If the pan won't sit within the turntable's diameter, it's safe to >> assume it >> will not rotate! >> > a 13X9 glass pan won't fit in a small microwave oven. > >> Jill's argument is childish stubbornness! >> >> Buy a bigger microwave or bake it. >> > Excuse me. But I had a bigger microwave and it died. And when I moved > to a much more expensive apartment I couldn't afford a big microwave. > So how about YOU get over it? I'm not too lazy to turn a dish a few > times in a microwave. > > Jill Jill, Stop carrying on!!! 13x9, is that the meaning of life, the universe and everything? Try a square pan and fudge it, woman!!! Geez... Andy 42 |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
jmcquown wrote:
> I'm not too lazy to turn a dish a few times in > a microwave. Dunno 'bout you, but I've got better things to do than manually turn a pan in my MW every 10.5 seconds. (Because that's what you'd have to do to emulate a turntable in an average MW oven - and thereby get the same even cooking results...) If you wanna call that lazy - so be it. -- Cheers Chatty Cathy |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article >, Andy > wrote:
> jmcquown said... > > > "Andy" > wrote in message > > ... > >> ChattyCathy said... > >> > >>> jmcquown wrote: > >> > >> hello? > > > > I didn't write that. You did. > > > >> Hello?? > >> HELLO??? > >> > >> If the pan won't sit within the turntable's diameter, it's safe to > >> assume it > >> will not rotate! > >> > > a 13X9 glass pan won't fit in a small microwave oven. > > > >> Jill's argument is childish stubbornness! > >> > >> Buy a bigger microwave or bake it. > >> > > Excuse me. But I had a bigger microwave and it died. And when I moved > > to a much more expensive apartment I couldn't afford a big microwave. > > So how about YOU get over it? I'm not too lazy to turn a dish a few > > times in a microwave. > > > > Jill > > > Jill, > > Stop carrying on!!! > > 13x9, is that the meaning of life, the universe and everything? I thought that was 42? > > Try a square pan and fudge it, woman!!! > > Geez... > > Andy I wonder if Lasagna could be made in a round pan. <g> > 42 -- Peace! Om "Any ship can be a minesweeper. Once." -- Anonymous |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
jmcquown wrote:
> "ChattyCathy" > wrote in message > ... >> http://www.recfoodcooking.com >> -- >> Cheers >> Chatty Cathy > > I'm not sure I know how to answer this survey so I didn't. MCINL > doesn't > cover my scenario. Oh, Puhhhh-leeeze. > I own two microwave ovens; they're in two > different > kitchens in two different states. And they're vastly different both > in functionality/features and age. So, pray tell, do they both have turntables that you seem to dislike so much? BTW, I had two flat tires today. (And no, I'm not going to give the group a blow-by-blow as to how that came about)... -- Cheers Chatty Cathy |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article >,
ChattyCathy > wrote: > BTW, I had two flat tires today. (And no, I'm not going to give the > group a blow-by-blow as to how that came about)... Why not? It feels good to vent. <g> That sounds seriously sucky. -- Peace! Om "Any ship can be a minesweeper. Once." -- Anonymous |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Omelet wrote:
> I wonder if Lasagna could be made in a round pan. <g> Of course. As long as you had a nice thick towel handy <eg> -- Cheers Chatty Cathy |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article >,
ChattyCathy > wrote: > Omelet wrote: > > > > I wonder if Lasagna could be made in a round pan. <g> > > Of course. As long as you had a nice thick towel handy <eg> OY! -- Peace! Om "Any ship can be a minesweeper. Once." -- Anonymous |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Omelet wrote:
> In article >, > ChattyCathy > wrote: > >> BTW, I had two flat tires today. (And no, I'm not going to give the >> group a blow-by-blow as to how that came about)... > > Why not? It feels good to vent. <g> > That sounds seriously sucky. In a word: Monday. -- Cheers Chatty Cathy |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
ChattyCathy wrote:
> http://www.recfoodcooking.com I just got a new mwo a few years ago (3-5?). My old one died. It was over 20 years old. It had a dial type timer and no turntable. It was quite primitive. The new one has all the bells and whistles. Adjustable power, special setting for defrosting and reheating. I think it has a baked potato setting and it definitely has a popcorn setting. Lot's of other neat features. It's great. Kate -- Kate Connally “If I were as old as I feel, I’d be dead already.” Goldfish: “The wholesome snack that smiles back, Until you bite their heads off.” What if the hokey pokey really *is* what it's all about? |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Omelet said...
> I wonder if Lasagna could be made in a round pan. <g> Om, They'll probably do that in Chicago! If you can extrapolate from their famous deep dish pizza... Ad pitch: "CHICAGO! All you can eat IN ONE SLICE, we promise!!!" Best, Andy |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Omelet wrote:
> In article >, > ChattyCathy > wrote: > >> http://www.recfoodcooking.com > > Interesting survey, thanks CC! > > We recently replaced ours. Our first microwave lasted about 15 years. > The last 3 have lasted less than 5. I blame the manufacturers! It's > why I'm reluctant to replace the kitchen 'frige. It's over 25 years old > and still working. Just looks a bit ratty. > > Things don't last as long as they used to any more! That's true. > Ours has a turntable and I've no idea if I can switch it off, nor do I > care to. Why would you want to turn off the turntable? Exactly! I can't imagine circumstances where I would want to turn it off. At least not for the sort of things I use it for. Kate -- Kate Connally “If I were as old as I feel, I’d be dead already.” Goldfish: “The wholesome snack that smiles back, Until you bite their heads off.” What if the hokey pokey really *is* what it's all about? |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
jmcquown wrote:
> "Omelet" > wrote in message > news ![]() >> In article >, >> ChattyCathy > wrote: >> >>> http://www.recfoodcooking.com >> >> Interesting survey, thanks CC! >> >> We recently replaced ours. Our first microwave lasted about 15 years. >> The last 3 have lasted less than 5. I blame the manufacturers! It's >> why I'm reluctant to replace the kitchen 'frige. It's over 25 years old >> and still working. Just looks a bit ratty. >> >> Things don't last as long as they used to any more! >> >> Ours has a turntable and I've no idea if I can switch it off, nor do I >> care to. Why would you want to turn off the turntable? >> -- >> Peace! Om >> >> "Any ship can be a minesweeper. Once." -- Anonymous > > > I'm afraid that's my doing ![]() > dislike my Sharp microwave because I can't turn off the turntable (nor > remove it). Sometimes I don't want it to turn. You can't put a > rectangular glass baking dish in it that won't turn due to its size, but > the turntable won't turn off, either. I bought the cheapest microwave > possible at the time. I was paying for moving from a neighborhood that > rapidly went downhill. I was dealing with a large monthly rent > increase. My safety and peace of mind was worth more than a lousy > $200/month more in rent but I did buy a cheap microwave. I've disliked > it ever since. Especially the turntable. It's no trouble to turn a > pan/bowl/dish yourself, really. Have we really gotten that lazy? It's not that it's difficult to turn pan/bowl/dish yourself, it's that it's inconvenient to have to keep stopping the oven and turning it and you don't get the same quality of even heating that you get when it turns automatically. At least that is my experience. And yes, I'm that lazy. Don't know about others. ;-) Kate -- Kate Connally “If I were as old as I feel, I’d be dead already.” Goldfish: “The wholesome snack that smiles back, Until you bite their heads off.” What if the hokey pokey really *is* what it's all about? |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article >,
ChattyCathy > wrote: > Omelet wrote: > > > In article >, > > ChattyCathy > wrote: > > > >> BTW, I had two flat tires today. (And no, I'm not going to give the > >> group a blow-by-blow as to how that came about)... > > > > Why not? It feels good to vent. <g> > > That sounds seriously sucky. > > In a word: Monday. Heh! Ok. I still have to work tonight. Monday is generally one of our busiest nights. -- Peace! Om "Any ship can be a minesweeper. Once." -- Anonymous |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 26, 10:47*am, "jmcquown" > wrote:
> "Andy" > wrote in ... > > ChattyCathy said... > > >> jmcquown wrote: > > > hello? > > I didn't write that. *You did. > > > Hello?? > > HELLO??? > > > If the pan won't sit within the turntable's diameter, it's safe to assume > > it > > will not rotate! > > a 13X9 glass pan won't fit in a small microwave oven. > > > Jill's argument is childish stubbornness! > > > Buy a bigger microwave or bake it. > > Excuse me. *But I had a bigger microwave and it died. *And when I moved to a > much more expensive apartment I couldn't afford a big microwave. *So how > about YOU get over it? *I'm not too lazy to turn a dish a few times in a > microwave. > > Jill I agree with you Jill. If a 9x13 is what you most often reheat or cook with in a microwave, then a large oven is important. That was one of the things I looked for when I bought my second oven. But if that's not a common size for your style of cooking, why the dickens would you want to blow the extra $200 to have capacity you might find necessary once or twice a year? Andy, you're being childish. maxine in ri ducking and running |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
maxine in ri said...
> Andy, you're being childish. > maxine in ri > ducking and running maxine in ri, Rhode Island? Where you gonna run to? Back into my arms again? <VBG> Andy |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
maxine in ri wrote:
>> Jill > > I agree with you Jill. If a 9x13 is what you most often reheat or > cook with in a microwave, then a large oven is important. That was > one of the things I looked for when I bought my second oven. But if > that's not a common size for your style of cooking, why the dickens > would you want to blow the extra $200 to have capacity you might find > necessary once or twice a year? Maxine, Before you duck and run anywhere, you need to read the thread that prompted this survey, i.e. Microwave life, and this post from Jill in particular: Message-ID: > >>I like to be able to put a large pyrex (say, 10X9 or 13X9) pan in the >>microwave. Â*The turntable is a problem since those size pans >>don't "turn" >>but the turntable does. >>Jill -- Cheers Chatty Cathy |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"ChattyCathy" > wrote in message
... > jmcquown wrote: > >> I'm not too lazy to turn a dish a few times in >> a microwave. > > Dunno 'bout you, but I've got better things to do than manually turn a > pan in my MW every 10.5 seconds. (Because that's what you'd have to do > to emulate a turntable in an average MW oven - and thereby get the same > even cooking results...) > > If you wanna call that lazy - so be it. > -- > Cheers > Chatty Cathy Most microwave recipes don't call for turning it every few seconds unless you're talking about microwave "fast food". Maybe every 10 minutes... depending upon the recipe. That would be actual recipes, not fast food stuff made for cooking in a microwave. Jill |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"maxine in ri" > wrote in message
... On Jan 26, 10:47 am, "jmcquown" > wrote: > "Andy" > wrote in > ... > > ChattyCathy said... > > >> jmcquown wrote: > > > hello? > > I didn't write that. You did. > > > Hello?? > > HELLO??? > > > If the pan won't sit within the turntable's diameter, it's safe to > > assume > > it > > will not rotate! > > a 13X9 glass pan won't fit in a small microwave oven. > > > Jill's argument is childish stubbornness! > > > Buy a bigger microwave or bake it. > > Excuse me. But I had a bigger microwave and it died. And when I moved to a > much more expensive apartment I couldn't afford a big microwave. So how > about YOU get over it? I'm not too lazy to turn a dish a few times in a > microwave. > > Jill I agree with you Jill. If a 9x13 is what you most often reheat or cook with in a microwave, then a large oven is important. It was back in the day, Maxine. I don't cook so much in a microwave these days but I had one that let me cook using actual baking dishes at one time. Jill |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"ChattyCathy" > wrote in message
... > maxine in ri wrote: > >>> Jill >> >> I agree with you Jill. If a 9x13 is what you most often reheat or >> cook with in a microwave, then a large oven is important. That was >> one of the things I looked for when I bought my second oven. But if >> that's not a common size for your style of cooking, why the dickens >> would you want to blow the extra $200 to have capacity you might find >> necessary once or twice a year? > > Maxine, > > Before you duck and run anywhere, you need to read the thread that > prompted this survey, i.e. Microwave life, and this post from Jill in > particular: > > Message-ID: > > > >>>I like to be able to put a large pyrex (say, 10X9 or 13X9) pan in the >>>microwave. The turntable is a problem since those size pans >>>don't "turn" >>>but the turntable does. > >>>Jill > -- > Cheers > Chatty Cathy What's your point? a 13X9 or even a 10X9 glass pyrex dish wouldn't "turn" on the turntable. What about this don't you undrstand? Jill |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"ChattyCathy" > wrote in message
news ![]() > jmcquown wrote: > >> "ChattyCathy" > wrote in message >> ... >>> http://www.recfoodcooking.com >>> -- >>> Cheers >>> Chatty Cathy >> >> I'm not sure I know how to answer this survey so I didn't. MCINL >> doesn't >> cover my scenario. > > Oh, Puhhhh-leeeze. > >> I own two microwave ovens; they're in two >> different >> kitchens in two different states. And they're vastly different both >> in functionality/features and age. > > So, pray tell, do they both have turntables that you seem to dislike so > much? > No, they don't both have turntables. The one in TN has a turntable that I can't turn off. The other has a much larger cooking space and I can easily turn a glass (pyrex) dish by hand. It's not so difficult to turn a dish by hand every 10-15 minutes. Jill |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
jmcquown wrote on Mon, 26 Jan 2009 15:10:37 -0500:
> "ChattyCathy" > wrote in message > ... >> jmcquown wrote: >> >>> I'm not too lazy to turn a dish a few times in >>> a microwave. >> >> Dunno 'bout you, but I've got better things to do than >> manually turn a pan in my MW every 10.5 seconds. (Because >> that's what you'd have to do to emulate a turntable in an >> average MW oven - and thereby get the same even cooking >> results...) >> >> If you wanna call that lazy - so be it. >> -- >> Cheers >> Chatty Cathy > Most microwave recipes don't call for turning it every few > seconds unless you're talking about microwave "fast food". Maybe every > 10 minutes... depending upon the recipe. That > would be actual recipes, not fast food stuff made for cooking in a > microwave. In any case, tho' I use a turntable to achieve even-ness, there are other ways such as the reflecting paddle that has been mentioned. Anyone who, for reasons best known to themselves, does not want the turntable might look into ovens using a paddle. You would have to ask or read about it since the reflector is not visible, I believe. You don't really need both. -- James Silverton Potomac, Maryland Email, with obvious alterations: not.jim.silverton.at.verizon.not |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
jmcquown wrote:
> "ChattyCathy" > wrote in message > ... >> jmcquown wrote: >> >>> I'm not too lazy to turn a dish a few times in >>> a microwave. >> >> Dunno 'bout you, but I've got better things to do than manually turn >> a pan in my MW every 10.5 seconds. (Because that's what you'd have to >> do to emulate a turntable in an average MW oven - and thereby get the >> same even cooking results...) >> >> If you wanna call that lazy - so be it. > > > Most microwave recipes don't call for turning it every few seconds > unless > you're talking about microwave "fast food". Maybe every 10 minutes... > depending upon the recipe. That would be actual recipes, not fast > food stuff made for cooking in a microwave. Most microwave recipes call for a MW with a turntable that turns at 5-6 RPM - for even cooking - whether it be "fast food" or not. Including the lasagna recipe you posted. However, if you like your food a 'little more done' in certain spots than others, goferit. -- Cheers Chatty Cathy |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
jmcquown wrote:
> "ChattyCathy" > wrote in message > ... >> maxine in ri wrote: >>> >>> I agree with you Jill. If a 9x13 is what you most often reheat or >>> cook with in a microwave, then a large oven is important. That was >>> one of the things I looked for when I bought my second oven. But if >>> that's not a common size for your style of cooking, why the dickens >>> would you want to blow the extra $200 to have capacity you might >>> find necessary once or twice a year? >> >> Maxine, >> >> Before you duck and run anywhere, you need to read the thread that >> prompted this survey, i.e. Microwave life, and this post from Jill in >> particular: >> >> Message-ID: > >> >> >>>>I like to be able to put a large pyrex (say, 10X9 or 13X9) pan in >>>>the microwave. The turntable is a problem since those size pans >>>>don't "turn" >>>>but the turntable does. >> >>>>Jill > > What's your point? a 13X9 or even a 10X9 glass pyrex dish wouldn't > "turn" > on the turntable. What about this don't you undrstand? I'll tell you what I have gleaned so far... 1. You dislike your MW because if you put in a 9x13 or even a 10x9 pyrex dish in it, it doesn't turn. So you turn said pyrex dishe(s) yourself a couple of times every 30-35 minutes - because to do less than that would be lazy (even tho' a MW turntable motor is capable of doing 5-6 RPM for you). 2. Your reason for having such a small MV is this: you were broke, had other priorities, so you bought a small one. Fair enough. 3. Even though you now own two houses (or own one, rent one rent one - not sure which) with a MW in each home - you are still bemoaning the fact that your small MW cannot manage to turn a 13x9 or even a 10x9 pyrex dish. Gimme a break. -- Cheers Chatty Cathy |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Good survey. I think I'm one of the last people I know to buy a mike. When I started to work a 9.5 hour day, it was time to cave and get one. I'm on my second one. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article >,
Kate Connally > wrote: > Omelet wrote: > That's true. > > > Ours has a turntable and I've no idea if I can switch it off, nor do I > > care to. Why would you want to turn off the turntable? > > Exactly! I can't imagine circumstances where I would want > to turn it off. At least not for the sort of things I use > it for. Most MW ovens are large enough to accept a 9" by 13" pan, but there isn't room enough to turn. But James S. brought up an interesting point. I assumed that every MW had a paddle (sometimes called a stirrer). He suggested that MWs might have *either* a paddle or a turntable. I asked Google, and got a couple of hits that sure seemed to confirm that. That would mean that if you had a MW with no paddle, and you disabled the turntable, that your food might develop serious hot and cold spots. If the pan barely fits, and your only turning is exactly 180 degrees, you might have trouble balancing out the hot and cold spots. Most instructions for rotating food in a MW that I've seen, call for 1/4 turn each time. Of course, a huge lasagna that takes 50 minutes from first insertion into the MW, to serving, will have time to balance out the temperature the same way it would in a conventional oven, through simple conduction of heat. I know that all of you didn't have enough to worry about, so I've added yet another thing. No charge! -- Dan Abel Petaluma, California USA |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article >,
ChattyCathy > wrote: > jmcquown wrote: > > What's your point? a 13X9 or even a 10X9 glass pyrex dish wouldn't > > "turn" > > on the turntable. What about this don't you undrstand? > > I'll tell you what I have gleaned so far... > > 1. You dislike your MW because I disagree with your reasons. I think Jill dislikes her current MW because her mother died. She's already said that she is mad at the world, and her MW is part of the world. As such, you really can't argue with her. -- Dan Abel Petaluma, California USA |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
jmcquown wrote:
> "Andy" > wrote in message ... >> ChattyCathy said... >> >>> jmcquown wrote: >> >> hello? > > I didn't write that. You did. > >> Hello?? >> HELLO??? >> >> If the pan won't sit within the turntable's diameter, it's safe to >> assume it >> will not rotate! >> > a 13X9 glass pan won't fit in a small microwave oven. > >> Jill's argument is childish stubbornness! >> >> Buy a bigger microwave or bake it. >> > Excuse me. But I had a bigger microwave and it died. And when I moved > to a much more expensive apartment I couldn't afford a big microwave. > So how about YOU get over it? I'm not too lazy to turn a dish a few > times in a microwave. > > Jill He might be employed. You should remember that many people here have an income. -dk |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
jmcquown wrote:
> "maxine in ri" > wrote in message > ... > On Jan 26, 10:47 am, "jmcquown" > wrote: >> "Andy" > wrote in >> ... >> > ChattyCathy said... >> >> >> jmcquown wrote: >> >> > hello? >> >> I didn't write that. You did. >> >> > Hello?? >> > HELLO??? >> >> > If the pan won't sit within the turntable's diameter, it's safe to > >> assume >> > it >> > will not rotate! >> >> a 13X9 glass pan won't fit in a small microwave oven. >> >> > Jill's argument is childish stubbornness! >> >> > Buy a bigger microwave or bake it. >> >> Excuse me. But I had a bigger microwave and it died. And when I moved >> to a >> much more expensive apartment I couldn't afford a big microwave. So how >> about YOU get over it? I'm not too lazy to turn a dish a few times in a >> microwave. >> >> Jill > > I agree with you Jill. If a 9x13 is what you most often reheat or > cook with in a microwave, then a large oven is important. > > It was back in the day, Maxine. I don't cook so much in a microwave > these days but I had one that let me cook using actual baking dishes at > one time. > > Jill Oh, the drama! -dk |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dan Abel wrote:
> > Most MW ovens are large enough to accept a 9" by 13" pan, but there > isn't room enough to turn. > > But James S. brought up an interesting point. I assumed that every MW > had a paddle (sometimes called a stirrer). He suggested that MWs > might > have *either* a paddle or a turntable. I asked Google, and got a > couple > of hits that sure seemed to confirm that. That would mean that if you > had a MW with no paddle, and you disabled the turntable, that your > food > might develop serious hot and cold spots. If the pan barely fits, and > your only turning is exactly 180 degrees, you might have trouble > balancing out the hot and cold spots. Most instructions for rotating > food in a MW that I've seen, call for 1/4 turn each time. Of course, > a huge lasagna that takes 50 minutes from first insertion into the MW, > to serving, will have time to balance out the temperature the same way > it would in a conventional oven, through simple conduction of heat. > > I know that all of you didn't have enough to worry about, so I've > added yet another thing. > > No charge! > Heh. Actually got something for nothing today - life is looking up ;-) FWIW, I pulled out the user manual for my MW. In the FAQ at the back of the booklet, it states NOT to operate the oven empty or without the 'glass tray' which must be placed on top of the 'rotating ring'. (So it's just as well I never felt the need to remove either of them). It also came with two racks and an extra tray that all fit nicely onto the glass tray i.e. they can rotate freely and are big enough to handle my 9x13 pyrex dish... Therefore, I think it's safe to assume that any food I defrost/heat up/cook in my particular MW is supposed to rotate, whether I want it to or not <veg> -- Cheers Chatty Cathy |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dan Abel wrote:
> In article >, > ChattyCathy > wrote: > >> jmcquown wrote: > >> > What's your point? a 13X9 or even a 10X9 glass pyrex dish wouldn't >> > "turn" >> > on the turntable. What about this don't you undrstand? >> >> I'll tell you what I have gleaned so far... >> >> 1. You dislike your MW because > > I disagree with your reasons. I think Jill dislikes her current MW > because her mother died. She's already said that she is mad at the > world, and her MW is part of the world. As such, you really can't > argue with her. > Heh. Another regular 'round here once remarked, "r.f.c. is cheaper than therapy." Guess she was right (again)... -- Cheers Chatty Cathy |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
(2009-09-27) NS-RFC: We need a survey: would ANYONE EVER... | General Cooking | |||
(2009-05-30) NS-RFC: Silly survey: Is 'facial fur' (on males) related to an interest in food/cooking? | General Cooking | |||
New Survey on the RFC site: Microwave ovens... | General Cooking | |||
Convection microwave vs reg microwave and toaster oven? | Cooking Equipment | |||
Convection microwave vs reg microwave and toaster oven? | General Cooking |