On Sun, 1 Feb 2009 10:50:36 -0500, "Ed Pawlowski" > wrote:

>
>"Susan" > wrote in message
>>
>> I'd never allow a non stick pan into my house for any purpose, frankly.
>>
>> Susan
>
>They are good for frying eggs. They are OK for a few other things, but not
>really needed. Not allowing them in the house is a bit extreme, IMO, but
>hey, its your house.
>
I disagree totaly, my 10 in. cast iron Lodge is the best egg fryer I've had in over 50
years.

On Mon, 02 Feb 2009 08:43:41 -0500, "
> wrote:

>On Sun, 1 Feb 2009 10:50:36 -0500, "Ed Pawlowski" > wrote:
>
>>
>>"Susan" > wrote in message
>>>
>>> I'd never allow a non stick pan into my house for any purpose, frankly.
>>>
>>> Susan
>>
>>They are good for frying eggs. They are OK for a few other things, but not
>>really needed. Not allowing them in the house is a bit extreme, IMO, but
>>hey, its your house.
>>
>I disagree totaly, my 10 in. cast iron Lodge is the best egg fryer I've had in over 50
>years.

No offense, guy, but this logic says nothing, if it's the *only* egg
fryer you've had in 50 years. This is a relative comparison, without
reference to a specific base population, means nothing.

I've used CI, S/S, Teflon I and II, Silverstone. To this day ( and
yes I have good 10" Wagner CI, well seasoned), I still do my omelettes
in a NS pan. And my frittatas, tho sometimes I use a small CI
skillet, as the 10 is a little large.

Alex