Sqwertz > wrote:

> Dave Smith > wrote:
>
>> swertz is misinformed. Police arrested five people after a disturbance
>> at a hotel. The guy who was burned was present but was taken to
>> hospital, not arrested. Two of the people arrested at the hotel have
>> since been charged with arson in connection to at least one of the
>> fires. I suppose that we could take a huge leap of logic and assume
>> that there was an incident that the police responded to and two of the 5
>> people arrested were later charged for arson in connection with at least
>> one of the fires set, but the person who had burns to 90% of his body
>> had nothing to do with the fire.
>
> All the reports I read said the 90% burn guy was arrested separately
> from the other two who were charged.
>
> Lets see your cite.

Yep. I Didn't think so.

-sw

Sqwertz wrote:

> Sqwertz > wrote:
>
> > Dave Smith > wrote:
> >
> >> swertz is misinformed. Police arrested five people after a disturbance
> >> at a hotel. The guy who was burned was present but was taken to
> >> hospital, not arrested. Two of the people arrested at the hotel have
> >> since been charged with arson in connection to at least one of the
> >> fires. I suppose that we could take a huge leap of logic and assume
> >> that there was an incident that the police responded to and two of the
5
> >> people arrested were later charged for arson in connection with at
least
> >> one of the fires set, but the person who had burns to 90% of his body
> >> had nothing to do with the fire.
> >
> > All the reports I read said the 90% burn guy was arrested separately
> > from the other two who were charged.
> >
> > Lets see your cite.
>
> Yep. I Didn't think so.


Such a hard hart you have on this Day of Love, Steve...


--
Best
Greg