We would to see Plucas face after he goes to AFP about a dead man
stalking him.

Dead man stalking....dead man stalking... yells Lucas.
ROFL

On Fri, 13 Feb 2009 17:28:50 -0800 (PST), Linda
> shouted from the highest rooftop:

>We would to see Plucas face after he goes to AFP about a dead man
>stalking him.

There are three things that mark you as a cowardly, nym-shifting
troll:

1. Your fascination (or should that be obsession?) with Peter Lucas.

2. Your use of google groups to post.

3. And the fact that you crosspost to the same groups over and over
again.



--

una cerveza mas por favor ...

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~
Wax-up and drop-in of Surfing's Golden Years: <http://www.surfwriter.net>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~

bob > wrote in
:

> 3. And the fact that you crosspost to the same groups over and over
> again.
>
>
>
> --
>
> una cerveza mas por favor ...
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~
> Wax-up and drop-in of Surfing's Golden Years: <http://www.surfwriter.net>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~
>

poor peewee.

Linda wrote:
> We would to see Plucas face after he goes to AFP about a dead man
> stalking him.

It's a shame you aren't dead.

On Sat, 14 Feb 2009 14:39:03 +1300, bob wrote:

> On Fri, 13 Feb 2009 17:28:50 -0800 (PST), Linda
> > shouted from the highest rooftop:
>
>>We would to see Plucas face after he goes to AFP about a dead man
>>stalking him.
>
> There are three things that mark you as a cowardly, nym-shifting troll:
>
> 1. Your fascination (or should that be obsession?) with Peter Lucas.
>
> 2. Your use of google groups to post.
>
> 3. And the fact that you crosspost to the same groups over and over
> again.

There are three things that mark you as screamingly bi-curious :

1. Your fascination (or should that be obsession?) with Peter Lucas.
2. Your use of Usenet to gain sexual favour with peter lucas.
3. And the fact that 'bob' is an acronym for (take your pick):
a: bloody old bore
b: bleeding orifice boy
c: big open bum-hole

On Sat, 14 Feb 2009 14:39:03 +1300, bob >
shouted from the highest rooftop:

>There are three things that mark you as a cowardly, nym-shifting
>troll:
>
>1. Your fascination (or should that be obsession?) with Peter Lucas.
>
>2. Your use of google groups to post.
>
>3. And the fact that you crosspost to the same groups over and over
>again.

Test to see if the filter works ...

--

una cerveza mas por favor ...

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~
Wax-up and drop-in of Surfing's Golden Years: <http://www.surfwriter.net>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~

On Sat, 14 Feb 2009 18:51:37 +1300, bob wrote:


> Test to see if the filter works ...

<http://images.google.com.au/images?hl=en&q=fail&btnG=Search+Images&gbv=2>

"Linda" > wrote in message
...
> We would to see Plucas face after he goes to AFP about a dead man
> stalking him.

Linda, assuming this is you and not a forgery....noting it doesn't seem
consistent to me...

Whilst not wishing to take either side of the Peter Lucas story, it is clear
he is being 'stalked' by at least one person, with many others jumping on
the bandwagon. Anyone who hasn't noticed the obviously faked posts are just
deluding themselves for the sake of an argument.

As to whether anyone likes/dislikes Peter Lucas that is up to them to decide
BUT, continuously feeding the Lucas related threads isn't going to make the
'stalker' or Peter Lucas go away.

Ignore the posts, otherwise it's merely more fuel to the benefit of one side
or the other.

To this end, this is my one and only post on this matter.

On Feb 15, 12:06*am, "The Raven" > wrote:
> "Linda" > wrote in message
>
> ...
>
> > We would to see Plucas face after he goes to AFP about a dead man
> > stalking him.
>
> Linda, assuming this is you and not a forgery....noting it doesn't seem
> consistent to me...
>
> Whilst not wishing to take either side of the Peter Lucas story, it is clear
> he is being 'stalked' by at least one person, with many others jumping on
> the bandwagon. Anyone who hasn't noticed the obviously faked posts are just
> deluding themselves for the sake of an argument.
>
> As to whether anyone likes/dislikes Peter Lucas that is up to them to decide
> BUT, continuously feeding the Lucas related threads isn't going to make the
> 'stalker' or Peter Lucas go away.
>
> Ignore the posts, otherwise it's merely more fuel to the benefit of one side
> or the other.
>
> To this end, this is my one and only post on this matter.

**** off black *******!

--
Peter Lucas
Brisbane
Australia

"Life is not like a box of chocolates... it's more like a jar of
jalapenos.
What you do today... might burn your ass tomorrow."