cybercat wrote:

> "T" > wrote in message
> . org...
> > In article >,
> > says...
> >>
> >> "T" > wrote
> >> >
> >> > Depends on what state you're in. Here in RI VicWit (Victim/Witness
> >> > Program) is a big deal.
> >> >
> >> Don't you have a big Mob presence up there?
> >
> > It used to be fairly large, now it's pretty much underground. I've
> > chatted with the head of the New England Mob on a few occasions. He
> > hangs out at the laundromat where I used to do my laundry.
> >
>
> Cool.


I'd think the head of the mob would have a wife to do his laundry...


--
Best
Greg

Gregory Morrow wrote:

> cybercat wrote:
>
>
>>"T" > wrote in message
a.org...
>>
>>>In article >,
>>>says...
>>>
>>>>"T" > wrote
>>>>
>>>>>Depends on what state you're in. Here in RI VicWit (Victim/Witness
>>>>>Program) is a big deal.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Don't you have a big Mob presence up there?
>>>
>>>It used to be fairly large, now it's pretty much underground. I've
>>>chatted with the head of the New England Mob on a few occasions. He
>>>hangs out at the laundromat where I used to do my laundry.
>>>
>>
>>Cool.
>
>
>
> I'd think the head of the mob would have a wife to do his laundry...
>
>

Maybe not. Those big-assed front-loading triple load machines are great
for cleaning large items like horse blankets, scuba suits and the
occasional blood-stained waterproof tarp.

Don't forget the bleach if you're worried about DNA.

"Sqwertz" > wrote in message
...
> cybercat > wrote:
>
>> I'd feel bad for him except for the "newborn racist" comment. What would
>> he
>> have done if it was a white guy?
>
> It wasn't. Not once, but twice.

You definitely have my sympathies: When I was still living in Indianapolis,
I got robbed at gunpoint 3 times. Once by a guy who appeared to be white,
once by a guy who appeared to be Hispanic, and once by a guy who was black.
(He's the one who actually held the gun to my head.) Sucks, doesn't it?

It was a couple years before I stopped getting nervous around *any* guys -
especially anyone wearing a hoodie or otherwise covering his face.

Glad you're okay, though.

Lisa Ann
(going back to lurk mode...)

Becca wrote:

> cybercat wrote:
>
> > Point is, to allow something like racism to grow from a bad incident
> > with a single person (or ten or one hundred people, for that matter)
> > is sadder than anything that might have happened in said incident. It
> > is a choice, and a malicious one. Assholes, thugs and thieves come in
> > all colors, shapes and sizes.
>
> You mean, like Madoff?


What Steve is somewhat referring to is "urban life is wearing"...

I see the assorted jamokes of which he speaks, plus in my hood (north side
of Chicago) it also gets really bad in the summer with all the obnoxious
sports fan on the street attending Chicago Cubs baseball games at Wrigley
Field, drunk and puking and fighting and stuff. I don't know why anyone
would willingly move to "charming Wrigleyville"...or near any other sports
venue for that matter.


--
Best
Greg

"Becca" > wrote in message
...
> cybercat wrote:
>
>> Point is, to allow something like racism to grow from a bad incident
>> with a single person (or ten or one hundred people, for that matter)
>> is sadder than anything that might have happened in said incident. It
>> is a choice, and a malicious one. Assholes, thugs and thieves come in
>> all colors, shapes and sizes.
>
> You mean, like Madoff?
>
Yes, and even worse, in terms of savagery and brutality. It disgusts me when
people use crime as an excuse to indulge racism.

"Gregory Morrow" > wrote
>
>
> What Steve is somewhat referring to is "urban life is wearing"...
>
> I see the assorted jamokes of which he speaks

Me too. Raleigh is pretty suburban sprawlish, but still urban enough and the
smallest city I have lived in. I have friends in the worst sections of
larger cities like NY and Baltimore and other places. (Goes with the
historic preservation thing, etc.) The hundreds of thousands of decent
people of color would not appreciate being lumped in with the very thugs who
make their lives as miserable as they make the lives of white people. It's
horseshit.

cybercat wrote:

> You don't have a clue what has or has not happened to me, racist pig.

Must have been something harrowing for you to be such a sour-puss
all the time.

-sw

cybercat wrote:

> Yes, and even worse, in terms of savagery and brutality. It disgusts me when
> people use crime as an excuse to indulge racism.

And your posts here in RFC are stunning examples of humanitarianism that
ought to win you the Nobel Peace Prize some day.

-sw

"Sqwertz" > wrote in message
...
> cybercat wrote:
>
>> Yes, and even worse, in terms of savagery and brutality. It disgusts me
>> when people use crime as an excuse to indulge racism.
>
> And your posts here in RFC are stunning examples of humanitarianism that
> ought to win you the Nobel Peace Prize some day.
>
Which doesn't make you less of an asshole.

"Sqwertz" > wrote in message
...
> cybercat wrote:
>
>> You don't have a clue what has or has not happened to me, racist pig.
>
> Must have been something harrowing for you to be such a sour-puss
> all the time.
>

Come on, Steve. You know that announcing that the fact that you were the
victim of one or more attempted or otherwise robberies had turned you into a
"newborn racist" would get reactions. That's why you said it, right? Or are
you really this big a moron? The people suffering most from black thugs are
decent black folks. They don't deserve your hatred, the thugs do.

cybercat wrote:
> "Sqwertz" > wrote in message
> ...
>> cybercat wrote:
>>
>>> You don't have a clue what has or has not happened to me, racist pig.
>> Must have been something harrowing for you to be such a sour-puss
>> all the time.
>
> Come on, Steve. You know that announcing that the fact that you were the
> victim of one or more attempted or otherwise robberies had turned you into a
> "newborn racist" would get reactions.

Yeah - I feel really bad about that. I didn't know it would make you so
upset.

-sw

"Sqwertz" > wrote in message
...
> cybercat wrote:
>
>> Yes, and even worse, in terms of savagery and brutality. It disgusts me
>> when people use crime as an excuse to indulge racism.
>
> And your posts here in RFC are stunning examples of humanitarianism that
> ought to win you the Nobel Peace Prize some day.
>
> -sw

I agree with this post.

--
Aloha Nui Loa,
TFM®

"Robert" > wrote in message
...
>
> "JERRY" > wrote in message
> m...
> >
> > "Robert" > wrote in message
> > ...
> >>
> >> "JERRY" > wrote in message
> >> ...
> >> >
> >> > "Mark Thorson" > wrote in message
> >> > ...
> >> >> Sqwertz wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> > I need to do some traveling to heal what ails me. Y'all know my
> >> >> > cluemail address if you want some support, abuse, or vibes.
> >> >> > Otherwise post here and get my usual guarantee.
> >> >>
> >> >> Is this related to that robbery attempt several
> >> >> months ago? Has the perp been tried?
> >> >
> >> > I'm prettys ure re's running form somebody's Husband.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> Again jerry reading you post as typed sounds like I'm drunk and I'm not
> > even
> >> drinking.
> >>
> >> Oh if your sure he is running from someone's husband. Then you thank he
> >> is
> >> Steve again and your admitting that you now believe his exploits' with
> >> women.
> >>
> >> Robert
> >
> > He always was and is Steve. I only call him Sam to pick on him when he
> > screws up and proove's hes actually steve, .like he just did.
> >
> >
>
> What your saying is this Steve is your puppet and you changed his name to
> Sam to pick on him. But the problem is that you keep screwing up and
calling
> him Steve when he is now Sam. Right
>
> Oh about his exploits with women is that your fantasy or his?
>
> Robert

Nope, I never said that. He's always been steve, and that's what I continue
to call him. Unless eh admits persoanlly that he is the same person as
steve was, and he changed his name to Sam for whatever reason. BTW it wasnt
him who did that, it was dan.

In article >,
blake murphy > wrote:

> On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 23:11:05 -0600, Damsel in dis Dress wrote:

> >>> On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 20:54:03 -0600, Sqwertz >
> >>> wrote:

> >>>> the first case

> >>>> The second robbery


> > He said he was a born-again racist because of his experiences.

> i have to say i agree with this, carol. the proper response is 'that man
> is a robber,' not 'those people are robbers.'

Sadly enough, the proper English usage is "those people" and not "that
man", unless he was robbed by the same person both times, in which case
I'm sure he would have mentioned it.

--
Dan Abel
Petaluma, California USA

"JERRY" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Robert" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>> "JERRY" > wrote in message
>> m...
>> >
>> > "Robert" > wrote in message
>> > ...
>> >>
>> >> "JERRY" > wrote in message
>> >> ...
>> >> >
>> >> > "Mark Thorson" > wrote in message
>> >> > ...
>> >> >> Sqwertz wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > I need to do some traveling to heal what ails me. Y'all know my
>> >> >> > cluemail address if you want some support, abuse, or vibes.
>> >> >> > Otherwise post here and get my usual guarantee.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Is this related to that robbery attempt several
>> >> >> months ago? Has the perp been tried?
>> >> >
>> >> > I'm prettys ure re's running form somebody's Husband.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> Again jerry reading you post as typed sounds like I'm drunk and I'm
>> >> not
>> > even
>> >> drinking.
>> >>
>> >> Oh if your sure he is running from someone's husband. Then you thank
>> >> he
>> >> is
>> >> Steve again and your admitting that you now believe his exploits' with
>> >> women.
>> >>
>> >> Robert
>> >
>> > He always was and is Steve. I only call him Sam to pick on him when he
>> > screws up and proove's hes actually steve, .like he just did.
>> >
>> >
>>
>> What your saying is this Steve is your puppet and you changed his name to
>> Sam to pick on him. But the problem is that you keep screwing up and
> calling
>> him Steve when he is now Sam. Right
>>
>> Oh about his exploits with women is that your fantasy or his?
>>
>> Robert
>
> Nope, I never said that. He's always been steve, and that's what I
> continue
> to call him. Unless eh admits persoanlly that he is the same person as
> steve was, and he changed his name to Sam for whatever reason. BTW it
> wasnt
> him who did that, it was dan.
>
>
Please finish your though

BTW it wasnt him who did that, it was dan.

Did what?

Robert

On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 11:40:26 -0600, Kathleen
> wrote:

>Gregory Morrow wrote:
>
>> I'd think the head of the mob would have a wife to do his laundry...
>>
>>
>
>Maybe not. Those big-assed front-loading triple load machines are great
>for cleaning large items like horse blankets, scuba suits and the
>occasional blood-stained waterproof tarp.
>
>Don't forget the bleach if you're worried about DNA.

Another reason to not go the laundromat.

Lou

Robert > wrote:

> "JERRY" > wrote in message
> ...
>
>> Nope, I never said that. He's always been steve, and that's what I
>> continue
>> to call him. Unless eh admits persoanlly that he is the same person as
>> steve was, and he changed his name to Sam for whatever reason. BTW it
>> wasnt
>> him who did that, it was dan.
>
> Please finish your though
>
> BTW it wasnt him who did that, it was dan.
>
> Did what?

I think he's trying to say that Steve changed his name to Sam, but
it wasn't really Steve int he first place, it was Dan.

OK. Now, who the **** is "Dan"? We have a Don, but no Dan that
I've noticed.

Jerry is either very drunk or very gifted.

-sw

zxcvbob > wrote:

> Did someone say they were black, or did you just assume... ;-)

They were Mongolians.

-sw

Damsel in dis Dress > wrote:

> On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 22:29:49 -0600, zxcvbob >
> wrote:
>
>>Did someone say they were black, or did you just assume... ;-)
>
> He said he was a born-again racist because of his experiences. Yeah,
> I assumed. Fill in the blank with whichever race you have bad
> feelings toward, Steve. And I hope you'll find your balance again.

That's a good point. Cyberslut (and Blake) just assumed they were
black. Why would a non-racist assume they were black?

-sw

cybercat > wrote:

> When Steve isn't being a genuine asshole, he's being a troll. Who can tell.
> Who cares?

You just got slammed.

Why did you assume they were black?

-sw

cybercat > wrote:

> "Sqwertz" > wrote in message
> ...
>> cybercat wrote:
>>
>>> You don't have a clue what has or has not happened to me, racist pig.
>>
>> Must have been something harrowing for you to be such a sour-puss
>> all the time.
>
> Come on, Steve. You know that announcing that the fact that you were the
> victim of one or more attempted or otherwise robberies had turned you into a
> "newborn racist" would get reactions. That's why you said it, right? Or are
> you really this big a moron? The people suffering most from black thugs are
> decent black folks. They don't deserve your hatred, the thugs do.

Who said anything about black people or 'people of color'?

Why did you assume they were black? Seems as if you assumed they
were black, then you somewhat agree with my alleged racist
tendencies, no?

-sw

T > wrote:

> It used to be fairly large, now it's pretty much underground. I've
> chatted with the head of the New England Mob on a few occasions. He
> hangs out at the laundromat where I used to do my laundry.

A mob Laundromat? What do you do, dump a piullowcase full of money
into the machine and 25 minutes later you pull out drugs, guns, and
Cuban cigars?

-sw

"Sqwertz" > wrote in message
...
> cybercat > wrote:
>
>> "Sqwertz" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> cybercat wrote:
>>>
>>>> You don't have a clue what has or has not happened to me, racist pig.
>>>
>>> Must have been something harrowing for you to be such a sour-puss
>>> all the time.
>>
>> Come on, Steve. You know that announcing that the fact that you were the
>> victim of one or more attempted or otherwise robberies had turned you
>> into a
>> "newborn racist" would get reactions. That's why you said it, right? Or
>> are
>> you really this big a moron? The people suffering most from black thugs
>> are
>> decent black folks. They don't deserve your hatred, the thugs do.
>
> Who said anything about black people or 'people of color'?
>
> Why did you assume they were black? Seems as if you assumed they
> were black, then you somewhat agree with my alleged racist
> tendencies, no?
>

You're right! It makes perfect sense for a white guy to say a robbery had
made him a "newborn racist" when it was a white guy who robbed him. Or tried
to.

Just shut the hell up, Steve. Sometime that is the best damage control.
Black, brown, yellow, they were people of color or you would not have said
what you said. Asshole.

cybercat > wrote:

> "Sqwertz" > wrote in message
> ...
>> cybercat > wrote:
>>
>>> "Sqwertz" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> cybercat wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> You don't have a clue what has or has not happened to me, racist pig.
>>>>
>>>> Must have been something harrowing for you to be such a sour-puss
>>>> all the time.
>>>
>>> Come on, Steve. You know that announcing that the fact that you were the
>>> victim of one or more attempted or otherwise robberies had turned you
>>> into a
>>> "newborn racist" would get reactions. That's why you said it, right? Or
>>> are
>>> you really this big a moron? The people suffering most from black thugs
>>> are
>>> decent black folks. They don't deserve your hatred, the thugs do.
>>
>> Who said anything about black people or 'people of color'?
>>
>> Why did you assume they were black? Seems as if you assumed they
>> were black, then you somewhat agree with my alleged racist
>> tendencies, no?
>>
>
> You're right! It makes perfect sense for a white guy to say a robbery had
> made him a "newborn racist" when it was a white guy who robbed him. Or tried
> to.

There are way more Mexicans in Texas. Why didn't you assume they
were Mexican? And why do you assume *I'm* White?

> Just shut the hell up, Steve. Sometime that is the best damage control.
> Black, brown, yellow, they were people of color or you would not have said
> what you said. Asshole.

Seems you're falling all over yourself trying to do dome damage
control. Truth is, you're nothing but a hypocrite.

-sw

"Sqwertz" > wrote in message
...
> cybercat > wrote:
>
>> "Sqwertz" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> cybercat > wrote:
>>>
>>>> "Sqwertz" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>> cybercat wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> You don't have a clue what has or has not happened to me, racist pig.
>>>>>
>>>>> Must have been something harrowing for you to be such a sour-puss
>>>>> all the time.
>>>>
>>>> Come on, Steve. You know that announcing that the fact that you were
>>>> the
>>>> victim of one or more attempted or otherwise robberies had turned you
>>>> into a
>>>> "newborn racist" would get reactions. That's why you said it, right? Or
>>>> are
>>>> you really this big a moron? The people suffering most from black thugs
>>>> are
>>>> decent black folks. They don't deserve your hatred, the thugs do.
>>>
>>> Who said anything about black people or 'people of color'?
>>>
>>> Why did you assume they were black? Seems as if you assumed they
>>> were black, then you somewhat agree with my alleged racist
>>> tendencies, no?
>>>
>>
>> You're right! It makes perfect sense for a white guy to say a robbery had
>> made him a "newborn racist" when it was a white guy who robbed him. Or
>> tried
>> to.
>
> There are way more Mexicans in Texas.

My bad. What a huge mistake.

>Why didn't you assume they
> were Mexican? And why do you assume *I'm* White?

You're the whitest, Steve.


>
>> Just shut the hell up, Steve. Sometime that is the best damage control.
>> Black, brown, yellow, they were people of color or you would not have
>> said
>> what you said. Asshole.
>
> Seems you're falling all over yourself trying to do dome damage
> control. Truth is, you're nothing but a hypocrite.

All you have to do is stop saying stupid things. Wait, maybe that's not such
a small task.

No assault, attempted robbery, whatever, by any kind of person justified
your asinine "newborn racist" comment. You were perfectly set in your
victimhood and insisted on flooring it all the way to offensive asshole
again.

cybercat wrote:

>> Seems you're falling all over yourself trying to do dome damage
>> control. Truth is, you're nothing but a hypocrite.

> All you have to do is stop saying stupid things.

That would keep you from being a hypocrite? Can you explain how that works?

> No assault, attempted robbery, whatever, by any kind of person justified
> your asinine "newborn racist" comment. You were perfectly set in your
> victimhood and insisted on flooring it all the way to offensive asshole
> again.

You know, all this whining, crying and carrying on you do here, you're
giving White people a bad name.

Now if you'll excuse me, I have an appointment at the tattoo shop for
another pair of lightning bolts.

-sw

On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 20:34:06 -0600, Sqwertz wrote:

> Robert > wrote:
>
>> "JERRY" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>
>>> Nope, I never said that. He's always been steve, and that's what I
>>> continue
>>> to call him. Unless eh admits persoanlly that he is the same person as
>>> steve was, and he changed his name to Sam for whatever reason. BTW it
>>> wasnt
>>> him who did that, it was dan.
>>
>> Please finish your though
>>
>> BTW it wasnt him who did that, it was dan.
>>
>> Did what?
>
> I think he's trying to say that Steve changed his name to Sam, but
> it wasn't really Steve int he first place, it was Dan.
>
> OK. Now, who the **** is "Dan"? We have a Don, but no Dan that
> I've noticed.
>
> Jerry is either very drunk or very gifted.
>
> -sw

well, there can be overlap between the two, but 'gifted' isn't an attribute
i would assign to jerry.

your pal,
blake

blake murphy wrote:

> well, there can be overlap between the two, but 'gifted' isn't an attribute
> i would assign to jerry.

Jerry will tell you he's gifted. Every year he is gifted with a dozen
fast food gift certificates for his birthday (courtesy of his grandmother).

-sw

On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 13:00:49 -0800, Dan Abel wrote:

> In article >,
> blake murphy > wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 23:11:05 -0600, Damsel in dis Dress wrote:
>
>>>>> On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 20:54:03 -0600, Sqwertz >
>>>>> wrote:
>
>>>>>> the first case
>
>>>>>> The second robbery
>
>>> He said he was a born-again racist because of his experiences.
>
>> i have to say i agree with this, carol. the proper response is 'that man
>> is a robber,' not 'those people are robbers.'
>
> Sadly enough, the proper English usage is "those people" and not "that
> man", unless he was robbed by the same person both times, in which case
> I'm sure he would have mentioned it.

don't be dense, dan. what i meant was perfectly clear.

what i'm talking about harks back many years. when someone saw a man being
an idiotic driver, they said 'that man is an idiot.' when a woman did the
same thing, they said 'women are idiots.'

surely you can see the difference.

blake

Lou Decruss wrote:

> On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 11:40:26 -0600, Kathleen
> > wrote:
>
>
>>Gregory Morrow wrote:
>>
>>
>>>I'd think the head of the mob would have a wife to do his laundry...
>>>
>>>
>>
>>Maybe not. Those big-assed front-loading triple load machines are great
>>for cleaning large items like horse blankets, scuba suits and the
>>occasional blood-stained waterproof tarp.
>>
>>Don't forget the bleach if you're worried about DNA.
>
>
> Another reason to not go the laundromat.
>
> Lou

I totally agree. Unless you need to wash a horse blanket, a scuba suit
or a blood-stained tarp.

On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 11:00:30 -0600, Sqwertz wrote:

> blake murphy wrote:
>> On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 20:43:20 -0600, Sqwertz wrote:
>>
>>> cybercat > wrote:
>>>
>>>> I'd feel bad for him except for the "newborn racist" comment. What would he
>>>> have done if it was a white guy?
>>> It wasn't. Not once, but twice.
>>>
>>> -sw
>>
>> and how many black people have you run into in the last two years? i'm
>> presuming more than a few.
>
> I get my share of them on the bus, where they are loud, obnoxious, crude
> and ignorant (and the homeless ones really stink). In the last 4 days in
> 3 separate incidents bus drivers have kicked off 7 of them, one of which
> required police assistance making me late for an appointment.
>
> And one was a lady with 2 kids under 7 years old, calling the bus driver
> all sorts of names and yelling at another passenger for no reason, telling
> him how she's going to "kick his mother-****ing ass".
>
> Of course they're all just victims of oppression. I really feel for them.

whatevahs.

your pal,
blake

On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 12:49:13 -0600, Sqwertz wrote:

> cybercat wrote:
>> "Sqwertz" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> cybercat wrote:
>>>
>>>> You don't have a clue what has or has not happened to me, racist pig.
>>> Must have been something harrowing for you to be such a sour-puss
>>> all the time.
>>
>> Come on, Steve. You know that announcing that the fact that you were the
>> victim of one or more attempted or otherwise robberies had turned you into a
>> "newborn racist" would get reactions.
>
> Yeah - I feel really bad about that. I didn't know it would make you so
> upset.
>
> -sw

cyber is right. to judge a whole group of people based on the actions of a
few individuals is moronic.

blake

On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 05:06:37 -0600, Sqwertz wrote:

> cybercat > wrote:
>
>> "Sqwertz" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> cybercat > wrote:
>>>
>>>> "Sqwertz" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>> cybercat wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> You don't have a clue what has or has not happened to me, racist pig.
>>>>>
>>>>> Must have been something harrowing for you to be such a sour-puss
>>>>> all the time.
>>>>
>>>> Come on, Steve. You know that announcing that the fact that you were the
>>>> victim of one or more attempted or otherwise robberies had turned you
>>>> into a
>>>> "newborn racist" would get reactions. That's why you said it, right? Or
>>>> are
>>>> you really this big a moron? The people suffering most from black thugs
>>>> are
>>>> decent black folks. They don't deserve your hatred, the thugs do.
>>>
>>> Who said anything about black people or 'people of color'?
>>>
>>> Why did you assume they were black? Seems as if you assumed they
>>> were black, then you somewhat agree with my alleged racist
>>> tendencies, no?
>>>
>>
>> You're right! It makes perfect sense for a white guy to say a robbery had
>> made him a "newborn racist" when it was a white guy who robbed him. Or tried
>> to.
>
> There are way more Mexicans in Texas. Why didn't you assume they
> were Mexican? And why do you assume *I'm* White?
>

o.k., white boy, what color *were* they? i'm guessing brown or black.
maybe 'yellow,' but most 'newborn racists' don't bother with them too much,
since they're so polite and do well in school and such.

blake

On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 20:35:22 -0600, Sqwertz wrote:

> zxcvbob > wrote:
>
>> Did someone say they were black, or did you just assume... ;-)
>
> They were Mongolians.
>
> -sw

well, then clearly all mongolians should be beaten severely and sent back
to wherever the **** they came from. and you should hate anyone who even
vaguely looks like them.

blake

On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 20:36:43 -0600, Sqwertz wrote:

> Damsel in dis Dress > wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 22:29:49 -0600, zxcvbob >
>> wrote:
>>
>>>Did someone say they were black, or did you just assume... ;-)
>>
>> He said he was a born-again racist because of his experiences. Yeah,
>> I assumed. Fill in the blank with whichever race you have bad
>> feelings toward, Steve. And I hope you'll find your balance again.
>
> That's a good point. Cyberslut (and Blake) just assumed they were
> black. Why would a non-racist assume they were black?
>
> -sw

black or maybe brown. who the **** else would a 'new-born racist' rail
about? pink? parti-colored? c'mon, steve, you can do better than this.

your pal,
blake

Gregory Morrow wrote:
>
> I'd think the head of the mob would have a wife to do his laundry...

Yes, if the only purpose of the establishment
is "laundromat".

"blake murphy" > wrote in message
.. .
> On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 20:36:43 -0600, Sqwertz wrote:
>
>> Damsel in dis Dress > wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 22:29:49 -0600, zxcvbob >
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Did someone say they were black, or did you just assume... ;-)
>>>
>>> He said he was a born-again racist because of his experiences. Yeah,
>>> I assumed. Fill in the blank with whichever race you have bad
>>> feelings toward, Steve. And I hope you'll find your balance again.
>>
>> That's a good point. Cyberslut (and Blake) just assumed they were
>> black. Why would a non-racist assume they were black?
>>
>> -sw
>
> black or maybe brown. who the **** else would a 'new-born racist' rail
> about? pink? parti-colored? c'mon, steve, you can do better than this.
>
See, that's how I feel. I want to like the guy.

cybercat wrote:

> "blake murphy" > wrote in message
> .. .
> > On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 20:36:43 -0600, Sqwertz wrote:
> >
> >> Damsel in dis Dress > wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 22:29:49 -0600, zxcvbob >
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>Did someone say they were black, or did you just assume... ;-)
> >>>
> >>> He said he was a born-again racist because of his experiences. Yeah,
> >>> I assumed. Fill in the blank with whichever race you have bad
> >>> feelings toward, Steve. And I hope you'll find your balance again.
> >>
> >> That's a good point. Cyberslut (and Blake) just assumed they were
> >> black. Why would a non-racist assume they were black?
> >>
> >> -sw
> >
> > black or maybe brown. who the **** else would a 'new-born racist' rail
> > about? pink? parti-colored? c'mon, steve, you can do better than
this.
> >
> See, that's how I feel. I want to like the guy.


Let's give the boy a lil' break, he's gone through this krap *twice*...


--
Best
Greg

"Gregory Morrow" > wrote:
>> See, that's how I feel. I want to like the guy.
>
>
> Let's give the boy a lil' break, he's gone through this krap *twice*...
>
Not. No excuse for racism, particularly *announced* racism.

In article >,
blake murphy > wrote:

> On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 13:00:49 -0800, Dan Abel wrote:
>
> > In article >,
> > blake murphy > wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 23:11:05 -0600, Damsel in dis Dress wrote:
> >
> >>>>> On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 20:54:03 -0600, Sqwertz >
> >>>>> wrote:
> >
> >>>>>> the first case
> >
> >>>>>> The second robbery
> >
> >>> He said he was a born-again racist because of his experiences.
> >
> >> i have to say i agree with this, carol. the proper response is 'that man
> >> is a robber,' not 'those people are robbers.'
> >
> > Sadly enough, the proper English usage is "those people" and not "that
> > man", unless he was robbed by the same person both times, in which case
> > I'm sure he would have mentioned it.
>
> don't be dense, dan. what i meant was perfectly clear.

Sorry about that. It was a lame attempt at humor.

> what i'm talking about harks back many years. when someone saw a man being
> an idiotic driver, they said 'that man is an idiot.' when a woman did the
> same thing, they said 'women are idiots.'
>
> surely you can see the difference.

Yeah, and I don't like it any better than you do.

--
Dan Abel
Petaluma, California USA