Chicken thigh fillets, coated with my 'secret' seasonings, baked in the oven,
then served with creamy garlicky mash (made of musgovian potatos), broccoli,
and corn.

http://i41.tinypic.com/2ljnsax.jpg

--
Peter Lucas
Brisbane
Australia

Killfile all Google Groups posters.........

http://improve-usenet.org/

http://improve-usenet.org/filters_bg.html

On Sat, 21 Feb 2009 22:55:37 +0000 (UTC), PL > wrote:

>Chicken thigh fillets, coated with my 'secret' seasonings, baked in the oven,
>then served with creamy garlicky mash (made of musgovian potatos), broccoli,
>and corn.
>
>http://i41.tinypic.com/

Looked like another cafeteria meal, unless those "secret" seasonings
were really something special!!

"Mr. Bill" > wrote in message
...
> On Sat, 21 Feb 2009 22:55:37 +0000 (UTC), PL > wrote:
>
>>Chicken thigh fillets, coated with my 'secret' seasonings, baked in the
>>oven,
>>then served with creamy garlicky mash (made of musgovian potatos),
>>broccoli,
>>and corn.
>>
>>http://i41.tinypic.com/
>
> Looked like another cafeteria meal, unless those "secret" seasonings
> were really something special!!
>
>
>
>
>

I thought the same thing.

--
danny

On Sat, 21 Feb 2009 20:28:47 -0500, in rec.food.cooking, dan stevens wrote:

> "Mr. Bill" > wrote in message
> ...
>> On Sat, 21 Feb 2009 22:55:37 +0000 (UTC), PL > wrote:
>>
>>>Chicken thigh fillets, coated with my 'secret' seasonings, baked in the
>>>oven,
>>>then served with creamy garlicky mash (made of musgovian potatos),
>>>broccoli,
>>>and corn.
>>>
>>>http://i41.tinypic.com/
>>
>> Looked like another cafeteria meal, unless those "secret" seasonings
>> were really something special!!
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> I thought the same thing.

Typical Lucas slop. He was exposed for the stolen copy and paste pics he's
been trying to pass off as his own cooking so he's trying to impress with
the crap he cooks.

Edith > wrote in news:41bnyiq9d4no$.hqy1lkf0yvmd.dlg@
40tude.net:


>>>>
>>>>http://i41.tinypic.com/
>>>

>
> Typical Lucas slop. He was exposed for the stolen copy and paste pics he's
> been trying to pass off as his own cooking so he's trying to impress with
> the crap he cooks.



ROFLMAO!!!

You have proof of course, don't you 'hey-zues'? I mean to say, you'd *never*
make any claims without any proof to back it up with, would you??? ROFL!!!

It seems rather telling that both you, and the other stalker kirkland, assume
*female* identities to allow you to post your lies.

Always knew that you were rather effeminate.

--
Peter Lucas
Brisbane
Australia

Killfile all Google Groups posters.........

http://improve-usenet.org/

http://improve-usenet.org/filters_bg.html

dan stevens wrote:
>
> "Mr. Bill" > wrote in message
> ...
>> On Sat, 21 Feb 2009 22:55:37 +0000 (UTC), PL > wrote:
>>
>>> Chicken thigh fillets, coated with my 'secret' seasonings, baked in
>>> the oven,
>>> then served with creamy garlicky mash (made of musgovian potatos),
>>> broccoli,
>>> and corn.
>>>
>>> http://i41.tinypic.com/
>>
>> Looked like another cafeteria meal, unless those "secret" seasonings
>> were really something special!!
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> I thought the same thing.
>
Same here . I would be ashamed to post that on here .

To be fair as long as the bloke is happy with his creations where is
the harm (except to culinary sensibilities and plain common sense )

"phil-c" > wrote in message
...
> dan stevens wrote:
>>
>> "Mr. Bill" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> On Sat, 21 Feb 2009 22:55:37 +0000 (UTC), PL > wrote:
>>>
>>>> Chicken thigh fillets, coated with my 'secret' seasonings, baked in the
>>>> oven,
>>>> then served with creamy garlicky mash (made of musgovian potatos),
>>>> broccoli,
>>>> and corn.
>>>>
>>>> http://i41.tinypic.com/
>>>
>>> Looked like another cafeteria meal, unless those "secret" seasonings
>>> were really something special!!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> I thought the same thing.
>>
> Same here . I would be ashamed to post that on here .
>
> To be fair as long as the bloke is happy with his creations where is the
> harm (except to culinary sensibilities and plain common sense )
>

At least we don't have to eat that slop.

--
danny

phil-c > wrote in news:gnrf56$7l4$2
@news.motzarella.org:


>>
>> I thought the same thing.
>>
> Same here . I would be ashamed to post that on here .
>
> To be fair as long as the bloke is happy with his creations where is
> the harm (except to culinary sensibilities and plain common sense )
>


You know, phil-the-dill cleaver, ....... you're real big on advice, and
real short on action.

Apart from you posting some shit thread trying to suck people into talking
to you, to show that you are "worthwhile"... what the **** do you
contribute to this group??


Nothing!!!!


A big fat zero.



You've already got a kick in the arse from your boss for using the work
computer to stalk me........ take the hint, you moron, and.......


don't go away angry...... just **** off.



--
Peter Lucas
Brisbane
Australia

Killfile all Google Groups posters.........

http://improve-usenet.org/

http://improve-usenet.org/filters_bg.html

On Sun, 22 Feb 2009 06:16:16 +0000 (UTC), PL wrote:

> Edith > wrote in news:41bnyiq9d4no$.hqy1lkf0yvmd.dlg@
> 40tude.net:
>
>>>>>
>>>>>http://i41.tinypic.com/
>>>>
>
>>
>> Typical Lucas slop. He was exposed for the stolen copy and paste pics he's
>> been trying to pass off as his own cooking so he's trying to impress with
>> the crap he cooks.
>
> ROFLMAO!!!
>
> You have proof of course, don't you 'hey-zues'? I mean to say, you'd *never*
> make any claims without any proof to back it up with, would you??? ROFL!!!
>
> It seems rather telling that both you, and the other stalker kirkland, assume
> *female* identities to allow you to post your lies.
>
> Always knew that you were rather effeminate.

i'm sure that won't deter you from threatening to kick them in the balls.

blake

phil-c wrote:

> To be fair as long as the bloke is happy with his creations where is the
> harm (except to culinary sensibilities and plain common sense )

I have no objection to Peter eating whatever he cooks. But it seems a bit
unseemly to take PRIDE in what appears to be on a par with a dinner out of
the freezer case. I've leveled that same criticism at cyber**** after it
crowed about its huge accomplishment in cooking some roadkill and frozen
vegetables in bottled stir-fry sauce.

I'm sure that Peter's dinner was palatable enough. It just doesn't seem
"special" enough to brag about.

Bob

Bob Terwilliger wrote:
> phil-c wrote:
>
>> To be fair as long as the bloke is happy with his creations where is
>> the harm (except to culinary sensibilities and plain common sense )
>
> I have no objection to Peter eating whatever he cooks. But it seems a
> bit unseemly to take PRIDE in what appears to be on a par with a dinner
> out of the freezer case. I've leveled that same criticism at cyber****
> after it crowed about its huge accomplishment in cooking some roadkill
> and frozen vegetables in bottled stir-fry sauce.
>
> I'm sure that Peter's dinner was palatable enough. It just doesn't seem
> "special" enough to brag about.
>
> Bob

Palatable I think is the key word if he likes it then go for it .
Maybe it just *looked* not all that special .
And to be fair obtaining DECENT fresh veggies here at the moment is
damn difficult due to flood fires heat waves etc etc .

Frozen foods are a gawd send and often more nutritious than something
that are days old by the time they hits the shelves .

Apart from our own gardens (which we have to net with shade cloth and
anti rabbit fox bird netting) obtaining decent food is expensive here
$4.80 for a days old lettuce !!! Mine owe me 20cents and are fresh
Although we have foxes that like to dig under the wire netting and hook
into the veggie patch (think it is the blood & bone that attracts them )

"Bob Terwilliger" > wrote in
:

> phil-c wrote:

> I have no objection to Peter eating whatever he cooks. But it seems a
bit
> unseemly to take PRIDE in what appears to be on a par with a dinner out
of
> the freezer case.


It's a *food* cooking group, you moron.

And as far as your opinion goes, you are entitled to it, even though it's
not worth a pinch of shit, you're still entiltled to it.



>
> I'm sure that Peter's dinner was palatable enough. It just doesn't seem
> "special" enough to brag about.
>


As it seems to be about the only food related subject on here of late,
you're probably not used to actually talking about, or looking at, food.


And *STOP* feeding the ****ing trolls.

"phil-c" is 'pits'.... the original stalker that went back to ozdebate and
dragged kirkland and 'hey-zues' back with it.





--
Peter Lucas
Brisbane
Australia

Killfile all Google Groups posters.........

http://improve-usenet.org/

http://improve-usenet.org/filters_bg.html

PL wrote:

>
> And *STOP* feeding the ****ing trolls.


Just who or what do you think you are ?

What weird stream of logic makes you think you can order people
about?

No wonder people arc up at- and over you .

It is *you* that is continually fanning the flames
of crappy posts in response to you seeking attention.

Are you plainly unable or simple unwilling to act like a normal human
being and adopt a low profile ?

Perhaps if you ceased or changed your attitude and manner of posting
all the crap would simply evaporate. It *has* to be worth a try eh .


Notice that I am NOT hooking into you OR cross posting OR using google


Perhaps the group some slack and keep your head down
and who knows you may return from Coventry

Fair dinkum suggestion

phil-c > wrote in news:gntggg$rae$1
@reader.motzarella.org:

> PL wrote:
>
>>
>> And *STOP* feeding the ****ing trolls.
>
>
> Just who or what do you think you are ?


*I'm* not a stalking ****ing troll, like you are.


>
> What weird stream of logic makes you think you can order people
> about?


To state that you are a liar, and a stalking troll???

That's very easy cleaver, I have proof........

****************************************
From: Bevan >
Newsgroups: rec.food.cooking,alt.ozdebate
Subject: Is Peter Lucas ***?
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 19:56:24 -0700 (PDT)
NNTP-Posting-Host: 202.167.15.163
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 02:56:25 +0000 (UTC)


On Jul 24, 10:30=A0am, "Tonia Fischer" > wrote:
> "The Tin Man" > wrote in messagenews:86037d2e-7022-=
...
>
> > Sure sounds like he is.
> > Not that's anything wrong with that!
>
> Why do you care about him so much? Are you ***? =A0Just ask him for Chris=
t's
> sake! =A0Why bother us with this diatribe?
>
> Tonia


Pits suggested pestering Peter Lucas in rec.food.cooking, that's all
it's about.
*******************************************


and..........

******************************************
From: Horry >
Newsgroups: rec.food.cooking,alt.ozdebate
Subject: Is Peter Lucas ***?
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 20:01:37 +0000 (UTC)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 20:01:37 +0000 (UTC)


On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 20:45:34 -0700, Pits8 wrote:

> On Jul 24, 10:56Â am, Bevan > wrote:
>> On Jul 24, 10:30Â am, "Tonia Fischer" > wrote:
>>
>> > "The Tin Man" > wrote in
>> > messagenews:86037d2e-7022-4bfe-a602-
...
>>
>> > > Sure sounds like he is.
>> > > Not that's anything wrong with that!
>>
>> > Why do you care about him so much? Are you ***? Â Just ask him for
>> > Christ's sake! Â Why bother us with this diatribe?
>>
>> > Tonia
>>
>> Pits suggested pestering Peter Lucas in rec.food.cooking, that's all
>> it's about.
>
> I did NOt suggest * Pestering *the poor old bugger just suggested take
> the sh
>
> You however, are bloody snake. Lucas with all his perceived failings at
> least is out there and when chooses to get in your face does so balls to
> the wall .
>
> I do not hold Lucas in contempt You on the other hand are beneath
> contempt
>
> As I said he has been no problem for a substantial time .

**** off, Pits. You DID suggest pestering Peter Lucas in
rec.food.cooking. I saw your post with my own eyes.


> Leave the poor old bugger alone and let him get on with his life .

I strongly suggest you take your own advice.
*************************************************



Now **** off pits, you semiliterate, stalking ****ing troll.




--
Peter Lucas
Brisbane
Australia

Killfile all Google Groups posters.........

http://improve-usenet.org/

http://improve-usenet.org/filters_bg.html

PeterLucas wrote:
> phil-c > wrote in news:gntggg$rae$1
> @reader.motzarella.org:
>
>> PL wrote:
>>
>>> And *STOP* feeding the ****ing trolls.
>>
>> Just who or what do you think you are ?
>
>
> *I'm* not a stalking ****ing troll, like you are.
>
>
>> What weird stream of logic makes you think you can order people
>> about?
>
>
> To state that you are a liar, and a stalking troll???
>
> That's very easy cleaver, I have proof......
You have NOTHING

Get a life and stop this crap now . You are only shooting yourself in
the feet .
You know my email address all you have to do is talk and be a human
If I have been wrong first to apologise

Ball is in your court

PL wrote:

>> I'm sure that Peter's dinner was palatable enough. It just doesn't seem
>> "special" enough to brag about.
>
> As it seems to be about the only food related subject on here of late,
> you're probably not used to actually talking about, or looking at, food.

Those must be some mighty powerful filters you're using, to have missed the
absolute FLOOD of food-related posts in the last week. Either that or you're
just so stupid that you've forgotten about them already.



> And *STOP* feeding the ****ing trolls.
>
> "phil-c" is 'pits'.... the original stalker that went back to ozdebate and
> dragged kirkland and 'hey-zues' back with it.

He was *defending* you in this thread, wasn't he? At any rate, your attempt
to dictate my posting behavior is utterly impotent -- a word with which
you're MORE than familiar, isn't it?

Bob

Bob Terwilliger wrote:
> PL wrote:
>
>>> I'm sure that Peter's dinner was palatable enough. It just doesn't seem
>>> "special" enough to brag about.
>>
>> As it seems to be about the only food related subject on here of late,
>> you're probably not used to actually talking about, or looking at, food.
>
> Those must be some mighty powerful filters you're using, to have missed
> the absolute FLOOD of food-related posts in the last week. Either that
> or you're just so stupid that you've forgotten about them already.
>
>
>
>> And *STOP* feeding the ****ing trolls.
>>
>> "phil-c" is 'pits'.... the original stalker that went back to ozdebate
>> and
>> dragged kirkland and 'hey-zues' back with it.
>
> He was *defending* you in this thread, wasn't he? At any rate, your attempt
> to dictate my posting behavior is utterly impotent -- a word with which
> you're MORE than familiar, isn't it?
>
> Bob

Bob , watch it or he will spend many man hours tracking down your
employer and writing bizarre allegations .
Or have some female ringing up and asking for personal details

Although such got the short straw <evil grin>
AND NO DATA ! REDIRECTED TO A BLIND PHONE NUMBER THAT COLLECTS AND
BACK TRACES SUCH CALLS

Talk about a nutter

"Bob Terwilliger" > wrote in
:

> PL wrote:
>
>>> I'm sure that Peter's dinner was palatable enough. It just doesn't
>>> seem "special" enough to brag about.
>>
>> As it seems to be about the only food related subject on here of late,
>> you're probably not used to actually talking about, or looking at,
>> food.
>
> Those must be some mighty powerful filters you're using, to have missed
> the absolute FLOOD of food-related posts in the last week. Either that
> or you're just so stupid that you've forgotten about them already.


It seems you're the one who's too stupid for your own good.

It was a totally food related post, and you joined in with the trolls in a
bitchfest about it.

You are no better than the trolls.

I let you out of the idiot bin because I thought you might have changed
from the complete arsehole you used to be. I was wrong.



Now don't go away angry, just **** off.



--
Peter Lucas
Brisbane
Australia

Killfile all Google Groups posters.........

http://improve-usenet.org/

http://improve-usenet.org/filters_bg.html

On Feb 23, 10:39*pm, PeterLucas > wrote:
> "Bob Terwilliger" > wrote :
>
> > PL wrote:
Snip
>
Bob said
> > Those must be some mighty powerful filters you're using, to have missed
> > the absolute FLOOD of food-related posts in the last week. Either that
> > or you're just so stupid that you've forgotten about them already.
>
> It seems you're the one who's too stupid for your own good.
>
> It was a totally food related post, and you joined in with the trolls in a
> bitchfest about it.
>
> You are no better than the trolls.
>
> I let you out of the idiot bin because I thought you might have changed
> from the complete arsehole you used to be. I was wrong.
>
> Now don't go away angry, just **** off.
>
> --
> Peter Lucas
> Brisbane
> Australia
>

Peter Peter (sigh) when are you going to wise up and realise that
you would be out of your depth in a car park Puddle ?

Peter wrote:

>>> As it seems to be about the only food related subject on here of late,
>>> you're probably not used to actually talking about, or looking at,
>>> food.
>>
>> Those must be some mighty powerful filters you're using, to have missed
>> the absolute FLOOD of food-related posts in the last week. Either that
>> or you're just so stupid that you've forgotten about them already.
>
>
> It seems you're the one who's too stupid for your own good.

Ah, way to admit that you were caught in a lie when you claimed your post
was "about the only food related subject on here of late." That WAS a lie,
wasn't it? (That was a rhetorical question, because everyone who reads this
group can SEE that it was a lie.)



> It was a totally food related post, and you joined in with the trolls in a
> bitchfest about it.

The "trolls" you decry were not the ones laughing at your dinner. I mean,
Mr. Bill and I don't exactly see eye-to-eye, but he's not a troll. Neither
is blake. The funny thing is that when one of your "trolls" stood up to
defend you, you promptly bashed him.

As I wrote earlier, I'm sure your meal was palatable enough. If I were in a
Sudanese prison or on a Tajikistan Airlines flight, I'd probably accept it
as adequate fodder. But when you post here BRAGGING about such sub-mediocre
fare, OF COURSE you're going to be ridiculed for it, and rightly so!

Now build a bridge and get over it, there's a good lad.

Bob

Sometime around Sat, 21 Feb 2009 20:28:47 -0500, "dan stevens"
> claimed:

>
>"Mr. Bill" > wrote in message
.. .
>> On Sat, 21 Feb 2009 22:55:37 +0000 (UTC), PL > wrote:
>>
>>>Chicken thigh fillets, coated with my 'secret' seasonings, baked in the
>>>oven,
>>>then served with creamy garlicky mash (made of musgovian potatos),
>>>broccoli,
>>>and corn.
>>>
>>>http://i41.tinypic.com/
>>
>> Looked like another cafeteria meal, unless those "secret" seasonings
>> were really something special!!
>>
>
>I thought the same thing.

This thread seems even more amusing, given the 'Do You Tell The Cook
The Truth?' thread elsewhere :-)

Sometime around Sun, 22 Feb 2009 16:44:26 +0000 (UTC), PL
> claimed:

>phil-c > wrote in news:gnrf56$7l4$2
:
>
>
>>>
>>> I thought the same thing.
>>>
>> Same here . I would be ashamed to post that on here .
>>
>> To be fair as long as the bloke is happy with his creations where is
>> the harm (except to culinary sensibilities and plain common sense )
>>
>
>
>You know, phil-the-dill cleaver, ....... you're real big on advice, and
>real short on action.
>
>Apart from you posting some shit thread trying to suck people into talking
>to you, to show that you are "worthwhile"... what the **** do you
>contribute to this group??
>
>
>Nothing!!!!
>
>
>A big fat zero.
>
>
>
>You've already got a kick in the arse from your boss for using the work
>computer to stalk me........ take the hint, you moron, and.......
>
>
>don't go away angry...... just **** off.

Real nice.

"Bob Ezrin" ha scritto nel essaggio
dan stevens" claimed:
>>"Mr. Bill" wrote in message
>>> Looked like another cafeteria meal, unless those "secret"
>>> seasonings>>> were really something special!!
>>>
>>
>>I thought the same thing.
>
> This thread seems even more amusing, given the 'Do You Tell The Cook> The
> Truth?' thread elsewhere :-)

I don't know either of you, but it really does seem amazing, after reading
these comments, that anyone shows this group anything they do.
All cooks are not photographers, every photographer doesn't have the same
idea about composition, and when it comes right down to is, a great photo of
what seems to be really tempting food can be constructed of clay, soap. oil
and dyes.

"Giusi" > wrote in
:

> "Bob Ezrin" ha scritto nel essaggio
> dan stevens" claimed:

>
> I don't know either of you, but it really does seem amazing, after
> reading these comments, that anyone shows this group anything they do.
> All cooks are not photographers, every photographer doesn't have the
> same idea about composition, and when it comes right down to is, a great
> photo of what seems to be really tempting food can be constructed of
> clay, soap. oil and dyes.
>
>


Guisi,

"Bob Ezrin", "dan stevens", "Edith", "phil-c" are all trolls.

The first 3 are probably versions of kirkland and 'hey-zues'. The last one is
the pathetic piece of s*** that started all this.



--
Peter Lucas
Brisbane
Australia

Killfile all Google Groups posters.........

http://improve-usenet.org/

http://improve-usenet.org/filters_bg.html

On Feb 25, 10:24*am, PeterLucas > wrote:
> "Giusi" > wrote :
>
> > "Bob Ezrin" *ha scritto nel essaggio
> > dan stevens" claimed:
>
> > I don't know either of you, but it really does seem amazing, after
> > reading these comments, that anyone shows this group anything they do.
> > All cooks are not photographers, every photographer doesn't have the
> > same idea about composition, and when it comes right down to is, a great
> > photo of what seems to be really tempting food can be constructed of
> > clay, soap. oil and dyes.
>
> Guisi,
>
> "Bob Ezrin", "dan stevens", "Edith", "phil-c" are all trolls.
>
> The first 3 are probably versions of kirkland and 'hey-zues'. The last one is
> the pathetic piece of s*** that started all this.
>
> --

**** of prick, you a paranoid.
Someone should put a bullet in your brain.
That is if you had a brain.

Warwick > wrote in news:4e6b2c7e-bda3-4ff0-bd3c-
:



It's the troll/stalker, kirkland.

Killfile it.


From: Warwick >
NNTP-Posting-Host: 69.10.33.194

From: Colin Green >
NNTP-Posting-Host: 69.10.33.194

From: PeterLucas >
NNTP-Posting-Host: 69.10.33.194

From: Baz >
NNTP-Posting-Host: 69.10.33.194

From: PeterL >
NNTP-Posting-Host: 69.10.33.194

From: Linda >
NNTP-Posting-Host: 69.10.33.194

From: Sara S >
NNTP-Posting-Host: 69.10.33.194

From: SaraS >
NNTP-Posting-Host: 75.125.163.150

From: Cheque >
NNTP-Posting-Host: 69.10.33.194

From: russell >
NNTP-Posting-Host: 69.10.33.194

From: spagetti >
NNTP-Posting-Host: 69.10.33.197

From: white pelican >
NNTP-Posting-Host: 69.10.33.194

From: spagetti >
NNTP-Posting-Host: 69.10.33.213

From: "P.Holgate" >
NNTP-Posting-Host: 69.10.33.194

From: Peter >
NNTP-Posting-Host: 69.10.33.194

From: "P.S." >
NNTP-Posting-Host: 69.10.33.200

From: Paul Scarlet >
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 19:35:48 -0800 (PST)
NNTP-Posting-Host: 69.10.33.210

From: Naomi de Moraes >
NNTP-Posting-Host: 69.10.33.211

From: Mad Dog >
NNTP-Posting-Host: 69.10.33.211


--
Peter Lucas
Brisbane
Australia

Killfile all Google Groups posters.........

http://improve-usenet.org/

http://improve-usenet.org/filters_bg.html

PeterLucas wrote:
> "Giusi" > wrote in
> :
>
>> "Bob Ezrin" ha scritto nel essaggio
>> dan stevens" claimed:
>
>> I don't know either of you, but it really does seem amazing, after
>> reading these comments, that anyone shows this group anything they do.
>> All cooks are not photographers, every photographer doesn't have the
>> same idea about composition, and when it comes right down to is, a great
>> photo of what seems to be really tempting food can be constructed of
>> clay, soap. oil and dyes.

Not to mention REAL food that is not only appetising but can look as
good as it tastes
>>
>>
>
>
> Guisi,
>
> "Bob Ezrin", "dan stevens", "Edith", "phil-c" are all trolls.
>
> The first 3 are probably versions of kirkland and 'hey-zues'. The last one is
> the pathetic piece of s*** that started all this.
>
>
>
Oi Get a life will you! Do something else apart from stalking and
spending
precious heartbeats fighting with straw men . What a waste of time .

Phil-c is NOT a troll show one post that is a troll

On Wed, 25 Feb 2009 09:50:49 +0900, phil-c >
wrote:

>Phil-c is NOT a troll

I agree. Phil posts about a lot of food-related topics, and is
basically a very pleasant guy. Phil, it's possible that I could have
missed something, but I've never seen you attacking anyone or starting
trouble.

Carol

--
Change "invalid" to JamesBond's agent number to reply.

Damsel in dis Dress > wrote in
:

> On Wed, 25 Feb 2009 09:50:49 +0900, phil-c >
> wrote:
>
>>Phil-c is NOT a troll
>
> I agree. Phil posts about a lot of food-related topics, and is
> basically a very pleasant guy. Phil, it's possible that I could have
> missed something, but I've never seen you attacking anyone or starting
> trouble.
>
> Carol
>



'phil-c' *is* pits/spamlister/tired-pits/pits09, you moron.


It is the original stalker/troll that went back to ozdebate and brought
kirkland and 'hey-zues' back with it. It is the one 'person' who *started*
all the trolling and stalking in rfc.

But that has been explained to you, and shown to you, before.

How is it that you can't seem to understand it?

Don't bother answering, I've put you back in the idiot bin. If you're
stupid enough to believe 'pits' isn't a troll/stalker, you're stupid
enough to stay in the idiot bin with them.

--
Peter Lucas
Brisbane
Australia

Killfile all Google Groups posters.........

http://improve-usenet.org/

http://improve-usenet.org/filters_bg.html

Peter wrote to Damsel:

> Don't bother answering, I've put you back in the idiot bin. If you're
> stupid enough to believe 'pits' isn't a troll/stalker, you're stupid
> enough to stay in the idiot bin with them.

Ironic, since Damsel is a certified genius and Peter is revealing more and
more idiocy every day.

Bob

On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 21:47:50 -0800, "Bob Terwilliger"
> wrote:

>Peter wrote to Damsel:
>
>> Don't bother answering, I've put you back in the idiot bin. If you're
>> stupid enough to believe 'pits' isn't a troll/stalker, you're stupid
>> enough to stay in the idiot bin with them.
>
>Ironic, since Damsel is a certified genius and Peter is revealing more and
>more idiocy every day.

Sounds like you need a new irony meter, too, Bob. Maybe we can get a
group discount or somethin'.

Carol

--
Change "invalid" to JamesBond's agent number to reply.

On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 23:48:47 +0000, PeterLucas wrote:

> Warwick > wrote in news:4e6b2c7e-bda3-4ff0-bd3c-
> :
>
> It's the troll/stalker, kirkland.

No, it isnt, actually.

> Killfile it.

No.

Incredible as it may sound to you, you get no say in who reads what here.

PS: your sig is *lame*

> --
> Peter Lucas
> Brisbane
> Australia
>
> I support the Greens, and I hope you do too:
> http://greens.org.au
> www.qld.greens.org.au
> www.greenpeace.org.au

On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 23:24:39 +0000, PeterLucas copied & pasted:

> "Giusi" > wrote in
> :
>> "Bob Ezrin" ha scritto nel essaggio
>> dan stevens" claimed:
>
>> I don't know either of you, but it really does seem amazing, after
>> reading these comments, that anyone shows this group anything they do.
>> All cooks are not photographers, every photographer doesn't have the
>> same idea about composition, and when it comes right down to is, a
>> great photo of what seems to be really tempting food can be constructed
>> of clay, soap. oil and dyes.
>>
>
> "Bob Ezrin", "dan stevens", "Edith", "phil-c" are all trolls.
>
> The first 3 are probably versions of kirkland and 'hey-zues'. The last
> one is the pathetic piece of s*** that started all this.

LOL, I'm glad I read this one pete. You can't pick who is who for shit!

Posts you attribute to 'bevan' (previously attributed by you to Phil,
then me, then bevan) were mine... and some you attribute to 'bevan' were
from me!

/Then/ you attack some innocent participants in various threads simply
because they've said something you didnt like - ergo they must be the
'stalker - trolls'! LOL!!!

And /Then/ you /*still*/ havent figured out that some of the 'stalker
trolls' are people you've never even thought about at all, yet is fairly
clear who they are due to the content and style(s) involved. ROTFL :-)

Fvckin' great stuff <G>.

"-Jeßus-" > wrote in message
...
> On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 23:24:39 +0000, PeterLucas copied & pasted:
>
>> "Giusi" > wrote in
>> :
>>> "Bob Ezrin" ha scritto nel essaggio
>>> dan stevens" claimed:
>>
>>> I don't know either of you, but it really does seem amazing, after
>>> reading these comments, that anyone shows this group anything they do.
>>> All cooks are not photographers, every photographer doesn't have the
>>> same idea about composition, and when it comes right down to is, a
>>> great photo of what seems to be really tempting food can be constructed
>>> of clay, soap. oil and dyes.
>>>
>>
>> "Bob Ezrin", "dan stevens", "Edith", "phil-c" are all trolls.
>>
>> The first 3 are probably versions of kirkland and 'hey-zues'. The last
>> one is the pathetic piece of s*** that started all this.
>
> LOL, I'm glad I read this one pete. You can't pick who is who for shit!
>
> Posts you attribute to 'bevan' (previously attributed by you to Phil,
> then me, then bevan) were mine... and some you attribute to 'bevan' were
> from me!
>
> /Then/ you attack some innocent participants in various threads simply
> because they've said something you didnt like - ergo they must be the
> 'stalker - trolls'! LOL!!!
>
> And /Then/ you /*still*/ havent figured out that some of the 'stalker
> trolls' are people you've never even thought about at all, yet is fairly
> clear who they are due to the content and style(s) involved. ROTFL :-)
>

You're just tedious. I used to think you were fun until all this Lucas shit.