Giusi wrote:

> What a genius.

Only if he/she is left handed.
--
Cheers
Chatty Cathy

"ChattyCathy" wrote:
> Giusi wrote:
>
>> What a genius.
>
> Only if he/she is left handed.
>
>
Doesn't take a genius to know that handedness dictates which side of the bed
yoose gals get. LOL

On Mon, 2 Mar 2009 19:58:04 +0000, Tony wrote:

> On Mon, 02 Mar 2009 17:26:17 GMT, blake murphy wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 1 Mar 2009 18:01:54 +0000, Tony wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, 27 Feb 2009 18:05:29 -0500, cybercat wrote:
>>>
>>>> <Me> wrote in message ...
>>>>> On Fri, 27 Feb 2009 20:03:41 +0000, Tony > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Fri, 27 Feb 2009 18:48:21 +0100 (CET), Anonymous wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Citta di Castello, 06012
>>>>>>> IT
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Is this correct Giusi?
>>>>>
>>>>> Who knows, but it's a bit sad posting people's addresses.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Leave it to Janet "Tony" Baraclough.
>>>
>>> **** off, Ophelia.
>>
>> well, aren't you just a ray of sunshine?
>>
>> blake
>
> Don't like it? **** off!

yeah, you got a broad repertoire, too.

blake

"blake murphy" > wrote in message
...
> On Mon, 2 Mar 2009 19:58:04 +0000, Tony wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 02 Mar 2009 17:26:17 GMT, blake murphy wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, 1 Mar 2009 18:01:54 +0000, Tony wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Fri, 27 Feb 2009 18:05:29 -0500, cybercat wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> <Me> wrote in message
>>>>> ...
>>>>>> On Fri, 27 Feb 2009 20:03:41 +0000, Tony > wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On Fri, 27 Feb 2009 18:48:21 +0100 (CET), Anonymous wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Citta di Castello, 06012
>>>>>>>> IT
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Is this correct Giusi?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Who knows, but it's a bit sad posting people's addresses.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Leave it to Janet "Tony" Baraclough.
>>>>
>>>> **** off, Ophelia.
>>>
>>> well, aren't you just a ray of sunshine?
>>>
>>> blake
>>
>> Don't like it? **** off!
>
> yeah, you got a broad repertoire, too.
>

Janet is a piece of work. So's her alter-ego "Tony." One mean-spirited,
petty old lady.

Janet Baraclough wrote:
> The message >
> from "cybercat" > contains these words:
>
>>>>>>> Leave it to Janet "Tony" Baraclough.
>
>> Janet is a piece of work. So's her alter-ego "Tony."
>
> I have never posted anyone's address on usenet. Nor have I ever
> posted using a sockpuppet
> I am not the person posting as "Tony".
>
> That lie is a smear vendetta conducted by Ophelia and her assorted
> allies.
> It's long since been admitted, and retracted on group by one of the
> participants.

Who eventually confessed he didn't really know You do seem to have left
that bit out.

Bleagh.. I can't believe I had anything to say to you and now, having done
so, I feel unclean *boke*

"Ophelia" > wrote in message
...
> Janet Baraclough wrote:
>> The message >
>> from "cybercat" > contains these words:
>>
>>>>>>>> Leave it to Janet "Tony" Baraclough.
>>
>>> Janet is a piece of work. So's her alter-ego "Tony."
>>
>> I have never posted anyone's address on usenet. Nor have I ever
>> posted using a sockpuppet
>> I am not the person posting as "Tony".
>>
>> That lie is a smear vendetta conducted by Ophelia and her assorted
>> allies.
>> It's long since been admitted, and retracted on group by one of the
>> participants.
>
> Who eventually confessed he didn't really know You do seem to have left
> that bit out.
>
> Bleagh.. I can't believe I had anything to say to you and now, having done
> so, I feel unclean *boke*

You can look at her face and know she is a malicious liar.

cybercat wrote:
> "Ophelia" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Janet Baraclough wrote:
>>> The message >
>>> from "cybercat" > contains these words:
>>>
>>>>>>>>> Leave it to Janet "Tony" Baraclough.
>>>
>>>> Janet is a piece of work. So's her alter-ego "Tony."
>>>
>>> I have never posted anyone's address on usenet. Nor have I ever
>>> posted using a sockpuppet
>>> I am not the person posting as "Tony".
>>>
>>> That lie is a smear vendetta conducted by Ophelia and her
>>> assorted allies.
>>> It's long since been admitted, and retracted on group by one of
>>> the participants.
>>
>> Who eventually confessed he didn't really know You do seem to
>> have left that bit out.
>>
>> Bleagh.. I can't believe I had anything to say to you and now,
>> having done so, I feel unclean *boke*
>
> You can look at her face and know she is a malicious liar.

I would rather not, thank you *retch*

"Ophelia" > wrote in message
...
> cybercat wrote:
>> "Ophelia" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> Janet Baraclough wrote:
>>>> The message >
>>>> from "cybercat" > contains these words:
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Leave it to Janet "Tony" Baraclough.
>>>>
>>>>> Janet is a piece of work. So's her alter-ego "Tony."
>>>>
>>>> I have never posted anyone's address on usenet. Nor have I ever
>>>> posted using a sockpuppet
>>>> I am not the person posting as "Tony".
>>>>
>>>> That lie is a smear vendetta conducted by Ophelia and her
>>>> assorted allies.
>>>> It's long since been admitted, and retracted on group by one of
>>>> the participants.
>>>
>>> Who eventually confessed he didn't really know You do seem to
>>> have left that bit out.
>>>
>>> Bleagh.. I can't believe I had anything to say to you and now,
>>> having done so, I feel unclean *boke*
>>
>> You can look at her face and know she is a malicious liar.
>
> I would rather not, thank you *retch*
>
>

Good lord, are you people still reading cybercat's posts and think she's got
anything of interest to contribute? Astonishing.

OB Food: Dinner tommorrow will likely be baked cod fillets accompanied by
the the last of the fresh asparagus (steamed).

Jill

"jmcquown" > wrote in
:

> Good lord, are you people still reading cybercat's posts and think
> she's got anything of interest to contribute? Astonishing.

I find she contributes fine. What's YOUR problem?

--

Capitalism is the astounding belief that the most wickedest
of men will do the most wickedest of things for the greatest
good of everyone. - John Maynard Keynes

jmcquown wrote:
> "Ophelia" > wrote in message
> ...
>> cybercat wrote:
>>> "Ophelia" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> Janet Baraclough wrote:
>>>>> The message >
>>>>> from "cybercat" > contains these words:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Leave it to Janet "Tony" Baraclough.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Janet is a piece of work. So's her alter-ego "Tony."
>>>>>
>>>>> I have never posted anyone's address on usenet. Nor have I ever
>>>>> posted using a sockpuppet
>>>>> I am not the person posting as "Tony".
>>>>>
>>>>> That lie is a smear vendetta conducted by Ophelia and her
>>>>> assorted allies.
>>>>> It's long since been admitted, and retracted on group by one of
>>>>> the participants.
>>>>
>>>> Who eventually confessed he didn't really know You do seem to
>>>> have left that bit out.
>>>>
>>>> Bleagh.. I can't believe I had anything to say to you and now,
>>>> having done so, I feel unclean *boke*
>>>
>>> You can look at her face and know she is a malicious liar.
>>
>> I would rather not, thank you *retch*
>>
>>
>
> Good lord, are you people still reading cybercat's posts and think
> she's got anything of interest to contribute? Astonishing.

Even more astonishing that you read it and responded

Michel Boucher wrote:
> "jmcquown" > wrote in
> :
>
>> Good lord, are you people still reading cybercat's posts and think
>> she's got anything of interest to contribute? Astonishing.
>
> I find she contributes fine. What's YOUR problem?

Ophelia wrote:

> jmcquown wrote:
>> "Ophelia" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> cybercat wrote:
>>>> "Ophelia" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>> Janet Baraclough wrote:
>>>>>> The message >
>>>>>> from "cybercat" > contains these words:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Leave it to Janet "Tony" Baraclough.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Janet is a piece of work. So's her alter-ego "Tony."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have never posted anyone's address on usenet. Nor have I ever
>>>>>> posted using a sockpuppet
>>>>>> I am not the person posting as "Tony".
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That lie is a smear vendetta conducted by Ophelia and her
>>>>>> assorted allies.
>>>>>> It's long since been admitted, and retracted on group by one of
>>>>>> the participants.
>>>>>
>>>>> Who eventually confessed he didn't really know You do seem to
>>>>> have left that bit out.
>>>>>
>>>>> Bleagh.. I can't believe I had anything to say to you and now,
>>>>> having done so, I feel unclean *boke*
>>>>
>>>> You can look at her face and know she is a malicious liar.
>>>
>>> I would rather not, thank you *retch*
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Good lord, are you people still reading cybercat's posts and think
>> she's got anything of interest to contribute? Astonishing.
>
> Even more astonishing that you read it and responded


I realised that cyberkittie was a good egg and we now get along fine (I
always knew that, even when I was slagging her all the time).. In Jill's
case I finally had to admit to myself that over the years she's been a
top-class harridan...


--
Best
Greg

Janet Baraclough wrote:
> Plus, of course, the far more revealing retraction and statement he
> provided privately.

And I told you at that time not to count your chickens As he pointed out,
he didn't know you from Adam so hardly a resounding recommendation. As for
using the statement he provided privately, I won't publish what he told me
privately after your boasting.

You are very fond of using the archive against other people and for someone
who does not allow her posts to be achived, this is rather disengenous of
you.

Now, I mentioned to the people here that I couldn't handle nastiness and it
made me feel sick. This is exactly right. You are the person, along with
her crony that caused much unpleasantness over a number of years to me and
many others. I don't have the slightest doubt, that you are trying to begin
another 'war' Well you won't use me for that.

You will not draw me in again!!!

I am now finished with you and with this thread.

Take it outside, ladies.

Felice

On Thu, 18 Jun 2009 16:28:26 -0400, jmcquown wrote:
>>
>
> Good lord, are you people still reading cybercat's posts and think she's got
> anything of interest to contribute? Astonishing.

<derisive snort>
>
> OB Food: Dinner tommorrow will likely be baked cod fillets accompanied by
> the the last of the fresh asparagus (steamed).
>
> Jill

fascinating.

blake

Felice wrote:
> Take it outside, ladies.

Madam. Had you read my response you would have seen that my part in it is
finished!

"Felice" > wrote in message
...
> Take it outside, ladies.
>
> Felice

Why play hall monitor if you are going to make the same kind of OT posts?
You could have taken your suggestion to email too.

cybercat wrote:
> "Ophelia" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Felice wrote:
>>> Take it outside, ladies.
>>
>> Madam. Had you read my response you would have seen that my part in
>> it is finished!
>>
> Now, now, Ms. O. Come sit down for cookies and tea.

Why thank you m'dear, I shall enjoy that)

On Fri, 19 Jun 2009 17:42:49 +0100, "Ophelia" >
wrote:

>my part in it is
>finished!

Amen....YOU ARE finished.

"Mr. Bill" > wrote in message
...
> On Fri, 19 Jun 2009 17:42:49 +0100, "Ophelia" >
> wrote:
>
>>my part in it is
>>finished!
>
> Amen....YOU ARE finished.
>

You are such a dick.

On Jun 19, 2:42*pm, "cybercat" > wrote:
> "Ophelia" > wrote in message
>
> ...> Felice wrote:
> >> Take it outside, ladies.
>
> > Madam. *Had you read my response you would have seen that my part in it is
> > finished!
>
> Now, now, Ms. O. Come sit down for cookies and tea.

Hey, I don't think that Ms. O's "Story" is appropriate to this all
ages group.

--Bryan

On Fri, 19 Jun 2009 21:11:04 +0100, Ophelia wrote:

> cybercat wrote:
>> "Ophelia" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> Felice wrote:
>>>> Take it outside, ladies.
>>>
>>> Madam. Had you read my response you would have seen that my part in
>>> it is finished!
>>>
>> Now, now, Ms. O. Come sit down for cookies and tea.
>
> Why thank you m'dear, I shall enjoy that)

no gin?

your pal,
blake

blake murphy wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Jun 2009 21:11:04 +0100, Ophelia wrote:
>
>> cybercat wrote:
>>> "Ophelia" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> Felice wrote:
>>>>> Take it outside, ladies.
>>>>
>>>> Madam. Had you read my response you would have seen that my part
>>>> in it is finished!
>>>>
>>> Now, now, Ms. O. Come sit down for cookies and tea.
>>
>> Why thank you m'dear, I shall enjoy that)
>
> no gin?

Heh now you're talking ^5.. Sorry cat......................