Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
pure kona wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Apr 2009 02:38:47 GMT, "brooklyn1" > > wrote: >> The trick is in knowing how to cook the spiral cut hams. Place the cut side >> down in a pan and cover the ham *lightly* with foil (do not wrap), this is >> like placing the ham into a sauna, and then choose a bake time to the low >> end of package directions. And I want the ham to exude/sweat water into the >> pan, that leaches out a lot of salt, baking ucovered makes the water >> evaporate leaving the salt behind and the ham dry. My ham turning out >> perfectly delicious, and last minute I decided to try the glaze sauce... not >> bad but I won't again, I didn't like it and my cats don't like it either... >> good it didn't run to the interior. >> >> I baked it in that black non-stick Farberware pan that the sqwartz hates so, >> then I transfered it to my nice glass pan.... didn't want the ham to >> reabsorb the brine that accumulated in the pan... had I known dry ham would >> be an issue I would have taken a picture of all the brine in that pan, like >> about 12 ounces... there wan't much fat, this wasn't a fatty ham. >> >> I think it looks prety good, a nice dark mohogany, I especially admired that >> wee bit o' pink peeking out twixt those lips: >> http://i43.tinypic.com/13yotjs.jpg >> >> Here I flipped it to the business end, fixed myself a really good sammich: >> http://i40.tinypic.com/mjbm68.jpg >> > Thanks Sheldon. I bought a spiral for a quick and Happy Easter dinner > and will follow your directions. I needed some ![]() > > mahalo, > Cea > Those were nice photos, Sheldon. We celebrated yesterday, because our guests had to leave a few minutes ago. They have a 6 hour drive and they have to be at work in the morning. We had a Cook's spiral sliced ham and we enjoyed it (on sale, $1.39 per pound). Not too salty and there was little fat. We had a few big, yeast rolls left over from dinner and they made sandwiches out of those as a snack last night. Becca |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article >,
Becca > wrote: > We had a Cook's spiral sliced ham and we enjoyed it (on sale, $1.39 per > pound). Not too salty and there was little fat. We had a few big, > yeast rolls left over from dinner and they made sandwiches out of those > as a snack last night. > > > Becca That's a really good price! There is nothing like a good ham sandwich with a generous application of mayo imho. Adding a bit of cheese and serving it hot is not bad either. ;-d Gods I miss bread. <sigh> -- Peace! Om Life isn't about waiting for the storm to pass. It's about learning to dance in the rain. -- Anon. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
sf wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Apr 2009 11:01:32 -0600, "Dale P" > wrote: > >> The ham >> has a great texture and taste. Cooks has been acquired by Smithfield, so I >> think the changes are not going to be for the good. > > That's an interesting comment. I would think "Smithfield" and think > that's good... but you don't seem to think so. Why? > There are two very different "Smithfields". One is a mega giant packer that produces products for big box that according to some friends that are in food production and follow that stuff is owned by the Chinese: http://www.smithfieldfoods.com/ then there is Smithfield: http://www.smithfield.com/ |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
George wrote:
> sf wrote: >> On Sat, 11 Apr 2009 11:01:32 -0600, "Dale P" > wrote: >> >>> The ham has a great texture and taste. Cooks has been acquired by >>> Smithfield, so I think the changes are not going to be for the good. >> >> That's an interesting comment. I would think "Smithfield" and think >> that's good... but you don't seem to think so. Why? > > There are two very different "Smithfields". One is a mega giant packer > that produces products for big box that according to some friends that > are in food production and follow that stuff is owned by the Chinese: > > http://www.smithfieldfoods.com/ > > then there is Smithfield: > > http://www.smithfield.com/ > > > Yeah, but! If you click on the Smithfield icon on your first URL it leads you to the second URL. Smithfield foods owns Armour, Smithfield, etc. and Smithfield.com is just the home page for the Paula Deen recipes and Smithfield hams. What difference is there in the two. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Omelet" > wrote in message
news ![]() > In article >, > sf > wrote: > > I'll have mine sliced there (they will slice it up for free for me) so I > can freeze it in portions since there are just the two of us. > > At least dad is finally eating solid food again! I really thought I was > going to lose him there for awhile. > -- > Peace! Om > Oh, I'm so happy to hear that! It's a scary feeling. I'm glad he enjoyed the ham ![]() Jill |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Wayne Boatwright wrote: > I colored enough eggs in order to make deviled eggs tommorow and for egg > salad sandwiches for early in the week. Meantime, David made a couple of > Easter platters with the colored eggs, chocolate eggs, and jelly beans, all > nestled down in "grass". :-) We're practically sure, Lil' Wayne, that the minor - aged males in your nabe will really dig em', lol... -- Best Greg |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() jmcquown wrote: > "Omelet" > wrote in message > news ![]() > > In article >, > > sf > wrote: > > > > I'll have mine sliced there (they will slice it up for free for me) so I > > can freeze it in portions since there are just the two of us. > > > > At least dad is finally eating solid food again! I really thought I was > > going to lose him there for awhile. > > -- > > Peace! Om > > > > Oh, I'm so happy to hear that! It's a scary feeling. I'm glad he enjoyed > the ham ![]() I bet you laced your old man's ham with strychnine... -- Best Greg |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() >> On Sun, 12 Apr 2009 02:38:47 GMT, "brooklyn1" >>> I think it looks prety good, a nice dark mohogany, I especially >>> admired that wee bit o' pink peeking out twixt those lips: >>> http://i43.tinypic.com/13yotjs.jpg >>> >>> Here I flipped it to the business end, fixed myself a really good >>> sammich: >>> http://i40.tinypic.com/mjbm68.jpg Delicious looking ham, but I love the glass baking pan also! Is that a new pattern of pyrex or corning or something older, Sheldon? |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
brooklyn1 wrote:
Good picture. Good roasting method. I would have never come up with the idea of roasting the ham cut side down. Reducing the salt would be desirable. I was fondling a ham at the Safeway, but didn't see your picture until I got home. I probably would have gotten the ham rather than a rib roast. That's the breaks... > > The trick is in knowing how to cook the spiral cut hams. Place the cut side > down in a pan and cover the ham *lightly* with foil (do not wrap), this is > like placing the ham into a sauna, and then choose a bake time to the low > end of package directions. And I want the ham to exude/sweat water into the > pan, that leaches out a lot of salt, baking ucovered makes the water > evaporate leaving the salt behind and the ham dry. My ham turning out > perfectly delicious, and last minute I decided to try the glaze sauce... not > bad but I won't again, I didn't like it and my cats don't like it either... > good it didn't run to the interior. > > I baked it in that black non-stick Farberware pan that the sqwartz hates so, > then I transfered it to my nice glass pan.... didn't want the ham to > reabsorb the brine that accumulated in the pan... had I known dry ham would > be an issue I would have taken a picture of all the brine in that pan, like > about 12 ounces... there wan't much fat, this wasn't a fatty ham. > > I think it looks prety good, a nice dark mohogany, I especially admired that > wee bit o' pink peeking out twixt those lips: > http://i43.tinypic.com/13yotjs.jpg > > Here I flipped it to the business end, fixed myself a really good sammich: > http://i40.tinypic.com/mjbm68.jpg > > A couple months back I bought an unsliced butt half, cost $1.19/lb, but is a > lot more work to serve and contains a whole lot more waste, plenty fat, and > the aitch bone, and lots o' connective gristle, and required about twice as > long cooking time to heat through, I found the exterior quite dry while the > center especially around the bone not properly done... was no bargain. Next > time IF I buy one of those it will be a full ham and I will bone it. before > baking. I much prefer the spiral cut, I truly appreaciate being able to > build a sammiche on the spur with no hassle about carving. And the spiral > sliced always has very little exterior fat, they seem to trim it pretty > close before slapping it on that lathe. In the navy I prepared thousands, > upon thousands upon thousands of hams (the most often served meat), all huge > ones, typically 25-30 lbs each and none spiral sliced... to serve I had to > slice each one entirely by hand, and had to be quick, the line had to move > fast enough to feed the entire crew of some 350 in under 30 minutes.. there > were mess cooks to spoon and ladle the accompaniments but only the duty cook > could slice meat. When I say I know to carve any cut of meat I mean I can > in a drunken stupor, and at flank speed. So I really appreciate having a > spiral sliced ham in my fridge. I'm already looking forward to having ham > tomorow, believe it or not I'm thinking a ham on kosher for passover > matzo... how bad can a ham matzo brie be... gotta remember to pick up some > chrain. And yes, I can hochr a chr lunger good as any Rrrruske . Ask a > Ruske how to say "fish" without moving your lips... chrering > herring. LOL > > |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article >,
blake murphy > wrote: > i was wondeering the same thing. smithfield has some pretty good products. I posted something yesterday. After, it just didn't seem right, and other posts didn't fit in either. I did some checking. It appears that Smithfield, like Champagne, was a geographical designation. Champagne seems to be keeping up the battle. I don't know the exact story for Smithfield. Smithfield is a city in the state of Virginia in the US. By law, a Smithfield ham came from that city. Now, Smithfield is the name of a company that is a huge conglomerate. As always, "let the buyer beware". When you see champagne for US$3 a bottle, don't expect Champagne from France. When you see Smithfield Ham for US$2 a pound, don't expect a traditional ham. -- Dan Abel Petaluma, California USA "[Don't] assume that someone is "broken" just because they behave in ways you don't like or don't understand." --Miche |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 12 Apr 2009 14:31:26 -0700, Dan Abel > wrote:
>In article >, > blake murphy > wrote: > > >> i was wondeering the same thing. smithfield has some pretty good products. > >I posted something yesterday. After, it just didn't seem right, and >other posts didn't fit in either. I did some checking. > >It appears that Smithfield, like Champagne, was a geographical >designation. Champagne seems to be keeping up the battle. I don't know >the exact story for Smithfield. Smithfield is a city in the state of >Virginia in the US. By law, a Smithfield ham came from that city. Now, >Smithfield is the name of a company that is a huge conglomerate. > >As always, "let the buyer beware". When you see champagne for US$3 a >bottle, don't expect Champagne from France. When you see Smithfield Ham >for US$2 a pound, don't expect a traditional ham. And that fight for geographical origin/ indicators is being fought on many fronts. Kona Coffee, some kind of Missouri walnuts, French Roquefort cheeses, etc. are all trying to keep their geographical origin as the lead indicator. Our Kona Coffee Farmers group belongs to ORIGIN a French or Swiss organization. Go here if you want to know about ORIGIN: http://www.origin-gi.com/ Pretty cool group. It is an extremely tough fight. As for 100% Kona Coffee- we have rip-off people selling "Kona Blend" (10% Kona), "Kona Style", etc. They are all out to make a buck off a respected heritage. Always check the fine print if you are unsure. Thanks for allowing the rant ![]() aloha, Cea |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"George" > wrote in message
... > sf wrote: >> On Sat, 11 Apr 2009 11:01:32 -0600, "Dale P" > wrote: >> >>> The ham has a great texture and taste. Cooks has been acquired by >>> Smithfield, so I think the changes are not going to be for the good. >> >> That's an interesting comment. I would think "Smithfield" and think >> that's good... but you don't seem to think so. Why? > > There are two very different "Smithfields". One is a mega giant packer > that produces products for big box that according to some friends that are > in food production and follow that stuff is owned by the Chinese: > > http://www.smithfieldfoods.com/ > > then there is Smithfield: > > http://www.smithfield.com/ They are one and the same. Yes the history of Smithfield hams is there, but now it is a giant conglomerate. Actually they list Mexico and European companies, but no mention of China. Oh well, I have not been pleased with the Smithfield name on the pork products I have bought. DP |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I just cooked our Easter ham, also a Cook's Spiral and it was a mess.
When I picked it up to place in the pan, a big hunk of it fell off. Then I noticed that only the bottom quarter was 'spiralled". The rest was just one big hunk of ham, with quite a bit of fat. The area that was spiral was very uneven, some of the slices were paper thin, others about a half inch thick. I'm glad we didn't have company, it looked awful. It was $1.39 a lb at Stop and Shop, with the courtesy card. It tasted fine, though. I served it with asparagus and fried rice. Not my usual holiday meal, but it was just me, hubby and 31 year old son. I think next time, I'll look for something else besides Cook's. I do use the glaze, but like Sheldon, I don't care for the liquid package either. I weighed it and it was 6.5 oz. The stuff in the dry package makes a nice crisp edge to the meat, the liquid just melted off, leaving very little behind. I cooked it with fresh pineapple rings. All in all, not a bad meal, but disappointing presentation. Denise |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article >,
"jmcquown" > wrote: > "Omelet" > wrote in message > news ![]() > > In article >, > > sf > wrote: > > > > I'll have mine sliced there (they will slice it up for free for me) so I > > can freeze it in portions since there are just the two of us. > > > > At least dad is finally eating solid food again! I really thought I was > > going to lose him there for awhile. > > -- > > Peace! Om > > > > Oh, I'm so happy to hear that! It's a scary feeling. I'm glad he enjoyed > the ham ![]() > > Jill Thanks Jill. :-) -- Peace! Om Life isn't about waiting for the storm to pass. It's about learning to dance in the rain. -- Anon. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article >,
dsi1 > wrote: > Good picture. Good roasting method. I would have never come up with the > idea of roasting the ham cut side down. Reducing the salt would be > desirable. I was fondling a ham at the Safeway, but didn't see your > picture until I got home. I probably would have gotten the ham rather > than a rib roast. That's the breaks... There's always next time. <g> -- Peace! Om Life isn't about waiting for the storm to pass. It's about learning to dance in the rain. -- Anon. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 12 Apr 2009 14:31:26 -0700, Dan Abel wrote:
> In article >, > blake murphy > wrote: > >> i was wondeering the same thing. smithfield has some pretty good products. > > I posted something yesterday. After, it just didn't seem right, and > other posts didn't fit in either. I did some checking. > > It appears that Smithfield, like Champagne, was a geographical > designation. Champagne seems to be keeping up the battle. I don't know > the exact story for Smithfield. Smithfield is a city in the state of > Virginia in the US. By law, a Smithfield ham came from that city. Now, > Smithfield is the name of a company that is a huge conglomerate. > > As always, "let the buyer beware". When you see champagne for US$3 a > bottle, don't expect Champagne from France. When you see Smithfield Ham > for US$2 a pound, don't expect a traditional ham. well, sure. it's just that i don't think of smithfield when i think of companies that routinely put out dog food or worse. your pal, blake |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "blake murphy" > wrote in message ... > On Sun, 12 Apr 2009 14:31:26 -0700, Dan Abel wrote: > >> In article >, >> blake murphy > wrote: >> >>> i was wondeering the same thing. smithfield has some pretty good >>> products. >> >> I posted something yesterday. After, it just didn't seem right, and >> other posts didn't fit in either. I did some checking. >> >> It appears that Smithfield, like Champagne, was a geographical >> designation. Champagne seems to be keeping up the battle. I don't know >> the exact story for Smithfield. Smithfield is a city in the state of >> Virginia in the US. By law, a Smithfield ham came from that city. Now, >> Smithfield is the name of a company that is a huge conglomerate. >> >> As always, "let the buyer beware". When you see champagne for US$3 a >> bottle, don't expect Champagne from France. When you see Smithfield Ham >> for US$2 a pound, don't expect a traditional ham. > > well, sure. it's just that i don't think of smithfield when i think of > companies that routinely put out dog food or worse. > You know, I am from this part of the country (most ancestors from VA) and to me, a ham is a ham is a ham. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Christine Dabney" > wrote in message news ![]() > On Mon, 13 Apr 2009 12:13:48 -0400, "cybercat" > > wrote: > > >>> >>You know, I am from this part of the country (most ancestors from VA) and >>to >>me, a ham is a ham is a ham. >> > I am from that region too, and there are hams, and then there are > HAMSs. The difference from what Alton Brown calls city ham and > country ham. > Are you talking about salt cured and sugar cured? Salt being country ham, sugar being city? |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Christine Dabney" > wrote in message ... > On Mon, 13 Apr 2009 15:01:29 -0400, "cybercat" > > wrote: > > >>Are you talking about salt cured and sugar cured? Salt being country ham, >>sugar being city? >> > > No. A country ham can be either salt or sugar cured. A country ham > is a dry cure ham...and usually smoked as well...with the process > taking quite some time. > > A city ham is a ham that is wet cured, the usual supermarket type ham. > I have lived in the south my entire life. Every dry cure ham I have ever had was dreadfully salty, and what we call "country ham." I have never heard of a dry sugar cured ham. By definition,l a dry-cured ham has to be loaded with salt as salt was and is the preservative. Link, maybe? When I talk about ham, I am talking wet cured or what you call "city ham." I can't stand country or dry cured ham. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"cybercat" > wrote:
> "Christine Dabney" > wrote: > > "cybercat" > wrote: > > >>Are you talking about salt cured and sugar cured? Salt being country ham, > >>sugar being city? > > > No. *A country ham can be either salt or sugar cured. *A country ham > > is a dry cure ham...and usually smoked as well...with the process > > taking quite some time. Dry cured meat can be smoked without sugar or salt. It is possible to find dry smoked hams but it's probably easier to build your own smokehouse than to find one in most stores. > > A city ham is a ham that is wet cured, the usual supermarket type ham. Did Alton Brown invent this terminology? His show on ham was the first time I'd ever heard the term "city ham". > I have lived in the south my entire life. Every dry cure ham I have ever had > was dreadfully salty, and what we call "country ham." I have never heard of > a dry sugar cured ham. By definition,l a dry-cured ham has to be loaded with > salt as salt was and is the preservative. Link, maybe? The salt of a US country ham is intense enough that I'm happy with a couple of slices a year. I knw the principle of sugar curing works the same as salt curing, but I don't know that I've ever seen a candied hamd for sale anywhere. I'm not sure I want to try it given that I am unimpressed with "maple bacon". > I can't stand country or dry cured ham. I never expected to encounter anyone who doesn't like proscuito or black forrest ham. Huh. It's quite a stretch to me to not like the saltiness of US country ham and therefore write off the entire class of dry cured hams like that. Then again that's how I write off cheese that has mold growing in it - I've got no interest in trying yet another moldy cheese just because it's got another name. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Christine Dabney wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Apr 2009 15:01:29 -0400, "cybercat" > > wrote: > > >> Are you talking about salt cured and sugar cured? Salt being country ham, >> sugar being city? >> > > No. A country ham can be either salt or sugar cured. A country ham > is a dry cure ham...and usually smoked as well...with the process > taking quite some time. > > A city ham is a ham that is wet cured, the usual supermarket type ham. > > Christine Here's an example of how to make a true country ham. Smithfield hams, to be called a Smithfield ham, must be done entirely inside the city limits of Smithfield, VA. Not to be confused with Smithfield.com. http://www.ext.vt.edu/pubs/foods/458...58-223.html#L1 |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "brooklyn1" > wrote in message ... > Yesterday I bought a Cook's Spiral Sliced Ham. It cost $1.79/lb, weighed > 10.02 lbs... cost $17.94. It's in the oven now, according to directions > 275ºF for 2 1/2 hours. <Snip> Yep a rip off at that price. Normally I don't pay more than a buck a pound (99 cents). Don't need the glaze either. Dimitri |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dimitri wrote:
> > "brooklyn1" > wrote in message > ... >> Yesterday I bought a Cook's Spiral Sliced Ham. It cost $1.79/lb, >> weighed 10.02 lbs... cost $17.94. It's in the oven now, according to >> directions 275ºF for 2 1/2 hours. > > <Snip> > > Yep a rip off at that price. Normally I don't pay more than a buck a > pound (99 cents). The regular ham was $1.19/lb at the Safeway - that's a pretty good price. I like the spiral cut ham more, however, that was selling for about twice that. Well that's the breaks. I've never seen spiral ham at $.99/lb. That would pretty much signify that the end times are upon us... > > Don't need the glaze either. Can I have yours? It's great on ice cream. :-) > > Dimitri |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "dsi1" > wrote in message ... > Dimitri wrote: >> >> "brooklyn1" > wrote in message >> ... >>> Yesterday I bought a Cook's Spiral Sliced Ham. It cost $1.79/lb, >>> weighed 10.02 lbs... cost $17.94. It's in the oven now, according to >>> directions 275ºF for 2 1/2 hours. >> >> <Snip> >> >> Yep a rip off at that price. Normally I don't pay more than a buck a >> pound (99 cents). > > The regular ham was $1.19/lb at the Safeway - that's a pretty good price. > I like the spiral cut ham more, however, that was selling for about twice > that. Well that's the breaks. I've never seen spiral ham at $.99/lb. That > would pretty much signify that the end times are upon us... Usually short code - Albertsons and/or Vons/Safeway. Plopping it in the freezer stops the clock. Now is the time to look at the Ham inventories if you have freezer space - the same is true for Corned beef the week after St patties Dad. Dimitri |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dimitri" > wrote in message ... > > "brooklyn1" > wrote in message > ... >> Yesterday I bought a Cook's Spiral Sliced Ham. It cost $1.79/lb, weighed >> 10.02 lbs... cost $17.94. It's in the oven now, according to directions >> 275ºF for 2 1/2 hours. > > <Snip> > > Yep a rip off at that price. Normally I don't pay more than a buck a > pound (99 cents). > The butt I cooked last week was as good as ham gets. And 99 cents a pound. AND lower sodium and fat. Amazing but true. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Doug Freyburger" > wrote: >Did Alton Brown invent this terminology? His show on ham >was the first time I'd ever heard the term "city ham". People in Eastern NC use this term. >The salt of a US country ham is intense enough that I'm >happy with a couple of slices a year. I have had it prepared by Mama Dipp--who knows what she is doing--and by at least a score of southerners who have been doing it for a lifetime. Soaked for different lengths of time, etc. Refrigeration has eliminated the need for this disgusting crap. IMO. When I began bringing sugar cured ham (wet cured, whatever, you folks know exactly what I mean) to our family gatherings people stopped volunteering to bring country ham. Happily it seems. >I knw the principle of sugar curing works the same as salt curing, but I >don't know that I've ever seen a candied hamd >for sale anywhere. I'm not sure I want to try it given that I am >unimpressed with "maple bacon". Until I have seen anything like a dry, sugar cured ham, I am going to continue to call country ham salt cured and ham sugar cured. The former is dry, the later "wet" if you must. > I can't stand country or dry cured ham. It is an unhealthy throwback to the times before refrigeration. Sugar cured ham is salty enough. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
cybercat wrote:
> I have had it prepared by Mama Dipp--who knows what she is doing--and by at > least a score of southerners who have been doing it for a lifetime. Soaked > for different lengths of time, etc. Refrigeration has eliminated the need > for this disgusting crap. IMO. When I began bringing sugar cured ham (wet > cured, whatever, you folks know exactly what I mean) to our family > gatherings people stopped volunteering to bring country ham. Happily it > seems. > That's the first time I've heard ham described as "disgusting crap!" Your sugar cured ham sounds way cool. I'm working on getting my paws on some Morton cure - it seems there's none to be found in our little state. I don't, however, recall seeing an uncured hog thigh in the Safeway. What are you curing? |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "dsi1" > wrote > > That's the first time I've heard ham described as "disgusting crap!" Sorry, I just really dislike country ham. > Your sugar cured ham sounds way cool. I'm working on getting my paws on > some Morton cure - it seems there's none to be found in our little state. > I don't, however, recall seeing an uncured hog thigh in the Safeway. What > are you curing? I misled you somehow! I just buy the stuff. And at the Smithfield web site, they make the distinction only between dry cured and not dry cured. So I guess when I say "country ham" I mean "dry cured" ham, which is SALTED salt-cured ham as that is the preservative that keeps it from needing refrigeration. As in, the nasty crap people had to eat before they had refrigerators. :P Oops, I did it again! Below is the Smithfield web site. All counry hams are described as "salty" to one degree or another, those dry cured for less time are less salty. There is no mention of dry sugar curing, nor have I ever heard of sugar used to preserve meat. Maybe Christine is talking about some sort of salt curing that involves some sugar that I have never heard of. At Smithfield, "dry cured" equals salt cured. They do not use the term "wet cured" at all. They call hams that are not dry-cured "ham" and hams that are "country ham." The description of the latter states "These hams have been dry cured with SALT and must be sliced paper thin to enjoy the full country flavor." So, country ham is the dry salty crap and ham is the juicy lovely stuff. http://www.smithfieldhams.com/ |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
cybercat wrote:
> "dsi1" > wrote >> That's the first time I've heard ham described as "disgusting crap!" > > Sorry, I just really dislike country ham. > >> Your sugar cured ham sounds way cool. I'm working on getting my paws on >> some Morton cure - it seems there's none to be found in our little state. >> I don't, however, recall seeing an uncured hog thigh in the Safeway. What >> are you curing? > > I misled you somehow! I just buy the stuff. And at the Smithfield web site, > they make the distinction only between dry cured and not dry cured. So I > guess when I say "country ham" I mean "dry cured" ham, which is SALTED > salt-cured ham as that is the preservative that keeps it from needing > refrigeration. As in, the nasty crap people had to eat before they had > refrigerators. :P Oops, I did it again! Sorry to be so confused. I tend to be in that state a lot of the time. :-) I must have curing on my brain. Morton does have a product called Morton Sugar Cure but details on this product is sketchy. Since the Morton site calls for it to be used in a dry cure process, I guess the main agent in the product is salt. I'm guessing that what you call over there "ham" we call over here "canned ham." OTOH, whatever kind of ham you're talking about, it's a sure thing that things will get salty. :-) > > Below is the Smithfield web site. All counry hams are described as "salty" > to one degree or another, those dry cured for less time are less salty. > There is no mention of dry sugar curing, nor have I ever heard of sugar used > to preserve meat. Maybe Christine is talking about some sort of salt curing > that involves some sugar that I have never heard of. At Smithfield, "dry > cured" equals salt cured. They do not use the term "wet cured" at all. > > They call hams that are not dry-cured "ham" and hams that are "country ham." > The description of the latter states "These hams have been dry cured with > SALT and must be sliced paper thin to enjoy the full country flavor." So, > country ham is the dry salty crap and ham is the juicy lovely stuff. > > http://www.smithfieldhams.com/ > > |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "dsi1" wrote: > > That's the first time I've heard ham described as "disgusting crap!" Your > sugar cured ham sounds way cool. I'm working on getting my paws on some > Morton cure - it seems there's none to be found in our little state. I > don't, however, recall seeing an uncured hog thigh in the Safeway. A roast fresh ham is better eating than any cured ham... serrano, procuitto, westphalian, and the rest are just cold cuts. That's what I went to buy but there were none at my Safeway in town this year, I spoke to the butcher and he said he didn't know why there were no fresh hams this Easter. I guess I'll have to wait till Christmas. Easter and Christmas are the big fresh ham seasons. Sometimes I'll spot them at the big Price Chopper market off season but I don't like having to freeze them, they're not the same as fresh, and they are too big to roast and eat during warm weather. And remember, pork shoulder and boston butt is not ham.... if you have to eat those cured you may as well eat Spam. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
brooklyn1 wrote:
> "dsi1" wrote: >> That's the first time I've heard ham described as "disgusting crap!" Your >> sugar cured ham sounds way cool. I'm working on getting my paws on some >> Morton cure - it seems there's none to be found in our little state. I >> don't, however, recall seeing an uncured hog thigh in the Safeway. > > A roast fresh ham is better eating than any cured ham... serrano, procuitto, > westphalian, and the rest are just cold cuts. That's what I went to buy but > there were none at my Safeway in town this year, I spoke to the butcher and > he said he didn't know why there were no fresh hams this Easter. I guess > I'll have to wait till Christmas. Easter and Christmas are the big fresh ham > seasons. Sometimes I'll spot them at the big Price Chopper market off > season but I don't like having to freeze them, they're not the same as > fresh, and they are too big to roast and eat during warm weather. And > remember, pork shoulder and boston butt is not ham.... if you have to eat > those cured you may as well eat Spam. > > So that uncured part of the pig is called "ham?" I've never seen one of those before and cannot imagine what that would taste like. I suppose we're just too isolated to ship those here. Nobody would know how to cook it anyway. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "dsi1" > wrote > I'm guessing that what you call over there "ham" we call over here > "canned ham." Nooo! Nothing canned about it. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Christine Dabney" > wrote in message ... > On Mon, 13 Apr 2009 20:04:30 -0400, "cybercat" > > wrote: > > >> >>They call hams that are not dry-cured "ham" and hams that are "country >>ham." >>The description of the latter states "These hams have been dry cured with >>SALT and must be sliced paper thin to enjoy the full country flavor." So, >>country ham is the dry salty crap and ham is the juicy lovely stuff. >> >>http://www.smithfieldhams.com/ >> > > Your info is true regarding Smithfield hams. But it is only part of > the equation. There are lots of other country hams that are not cured > with the Smithfield cure and do involve a sugar cure. AND, they are > also classified as dry cured hams. > > I suggest that you read a bit more on this, as your information is not > totally true. > I would, but you know, from where I sit, Smithfield's about the best authority on hams. Other methods? Okay, whatever you say. For most people and most places on earth, "country ham" is dry cured, salt cured ham. Ham is not. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Christine Dabney" > wrote in message ... > On Mon, 13 Apr 2009 20:04:30 -0400, "cybercat" > > wrote: > > >>Below is the Smithfield web site. All counry hams are described as "salty" >>to one degree or another, those dry cured for less time are less salty. >>There is no mention of dry sugar curing, nor have I ever heard of sugar >>used >>to preserve meat. Maybe Christine is talking about some sort of salt >>curing >>that involves some sugar that I have never heard of. At Smithfield, "dry >>cured" equals salt cured. They do not use the term "wet cured" at all. > > Did you read the links I posted? > > Also, you can do a search on sugar curing...the info is out there. > > Sugar curing is a very valid way of curing things and is used in > curing hams as well as salt curing. I think if you read the links I > posted in this thread, you might find that out. > Sorry, Christine. I did not even notice the links, as a matter of fact. Just because there are other ways of curing things, that changes nothing with regard to most hams we run into being either dry and salt cured, or smoked and not dry cured. It just seems like a splitting of hairs, as they say, to me. I imagine you meant to be helpful, so, uh, thanks. I guess. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Christine Dabney" > wrote in message ... > On Mon, 13 Apr 2009 15:14:44 -0400, "cybercat" > > wrote: > > >>I have lived in the south my entire life. Every dry cure ham I have ever >>had >>was dreadfully salty, and what we call "country ham." I have never heard >>of >>a dry sugar cured ham. By definition,l a dry-cured ham has to be loaded >>with >>salt as salt was and is the preservative. Link, maybe? > > I grew up in VA myself. And believe it or not, salt is not the only > curing agent. Sugar can be one as well. That is how jams and > jellies are preserved, among other things such as hams. > > http://sugarmountainhome.com/livestock/curingmeat.html I just looked at this. You are indeed confusing salt curing that employs some sugar with "sugar curing." How asinine. You don't cure a country ham (e.g. a ham that does not need refrigeration, there is an ironclad definition for you) with anything but SALT. Are there other ingredients? Sure. Is sugar one? Sure. What a waste of my ****ing time. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Christine Dabney" > wrote in message ... > On Mon, 13 Apr 2009 20:04:30 -0400, "cybercat" > > wrote: > > >> >>They call hams that are not dry-cured "ham" and hams that are "country >>ham." >>The description of the latter states "These hams have been dry cured with >>SALT and must be sliced paper thin to enjoy the full country flavor." So, >>country ham is the dry salty crap and ham is the juicy lovely stuff. >> >>http://www.smithfieldhams.com/ >> > > Your info is true regarding Smithfield hams. But it is only part of > the equation. There are lots of other country hams that are not cured > with the Smithfield cure and do involve a sugar cure. AND, they are > also classified as dry cured hams. > > I suggest that you read a bit more on this, as your information is not > totally true. > This is what you were talking about, the incredibly significant fact that many people add sugar to their salt cured ham, which is what ALL country ham is--SALT CURED HAM, whether some sugar is used or not. The site reads, had you not been too ****ing lazy to excerpt it: " Cure Application The cure mix to use depends upon personal preference. Salt alone is acceptable. However, the dry sugar cure is preferred by most people. For each 100 lbs. of fresh meat, use: 8 pounds salt 2 pounds sugar 2 ounces of saltpeter* " EIGHT POUNDS OF SALT and two of sugar. This really amounts to something different from a salt cured ham. When I said "sweet" I simply meant ham that is not salt cured. I really have nothing against you. It is just that the thought patterns of petty people make me want to kill myself. May you live to make all the petty distinctions that bring you joy. I am going to have to killfile you now. No hard feelings, it is just that you just somehow induced me to waste seven minutes on nothing. Wasting my time is wasting my life. May God Bless and keep you and all your little hairsplitting elves, too. *smooches* |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Gregory Morrow" > wrote > There was an article in one of the Chicawgo papers last week about hams, > apparently fresh ham is pretty rare on the ground unless you special order > it. It's pork roast, Greg. It's ****ing PORK ROAST. Different cut, usually cured, but pork roast. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() dsi1 wrote: > brooklyn1 wrote: > > "dsi1" wrote: > >> That's the first time I've heard ham described as "disgusting crap!" Your > >> sugar cured ham sounds way cool. I'm working on getting my paws on some > >> Morton cure - it seems there's none to be found in our little state. I > >> don't, however, recall seeing an uncured hog thigh in the Safeway. > > > > A roast fresh ham is better eating than any cured ham... serrano, procuitto, > > westphalian, and the rest are just cold cuts. That's what I went to buy but > > there were none at my Safeway in town this year, I spoke to the butcher and > > he said he didn't know why there were no fresh hams this Easter. I guess > > I'll have to wait till Christmas. Easter and Christmas are the big fresh ham > > seasons. Sometimes I'll spot them at the big Price Chopper market off > > season but I don't like having to freeze them, they're not the same as > > fresh, and they are too big to roast and eat during warm weather. And > > remember, pork shoulder and boston butt is not ham.... if you have to eat > > those cured you may as well eat Spam. > > > > > > So that uncured part of the pig is called "ham?" I've never seen one of > those before and cannot imagine what that would taste like. I suppose > we're just too isolated to ship those here. Nobody would know how to > cook it anyway. There was an article in one of the Chicawgo papers last week about hams, apparently fresh ham is pretty rare on the ground unless you special order it. It's more of a "European" thing, and even then the stores cited (Germanic, Polish...) only sell a few a year. The article sez that actually a Puerto Rican - type place might be the best place to try to find one... I cannot vouch for the veracity of the article, it's just what I read... There are a couple of meat markets here in Chicago, the kind where you have to don a coat (it's basically a big walk - in freezer) and go in and choose your raw cuts. I may be taking a trek to one of these places soon, as it's BBQ season and you can get meat pretty cheap. I'll be looking for a fresh ham, it's surely available there. Here is the URL of a discussion (from a local Chicago food forum) of one of these places, Peoria Packing in Chicago:: http://www.lthforum.com/bb/viewtopic.php?p=23813 -- Best Greg |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() cybercat wrote: > "Gregory Morrow" > wrote > > There was an article in one of the Chicawgo papers last week about hams, > > apparently fresh ham is pretty rare on the ground unless you special order > > it. > > It's pork roast, Greg. It's ****ing PORK ROAST. Different cut, usually > cured, but pork roast. OKAY THEN... ;-P -- Best Greg |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "dsi1" > wrote in message ... > brooklyn1 wrote: >> "dsi1" wrote: >>> That's the first time I've heard ham described as "disgusting crap!" >>> Your sugar cured ham sounds way cool. I'm working on getting my paws on >>> some Morton cure - it seems there's none to be found in our little >>> state. I don't, however, recall seeing an uncured hog thigh in the >>> Safeway. >> >> A roast fresh ham is better eating than any cured ham... serrano, >> procuitto, westphalian, and the rest are just cold cuts. That's what I >> went to buy but there were none at my Safeway in town this year, I spoke >> to the butcher and he said he didn't know why there were no fresh hams >> this Easter. I guess I'll have to wait till Christmas. Easter and >> Christmas are the big fresh ham seasons. Sometimes I'll spot them at the >> big Price Chopper market off season but I don't like having to freeze >> them, they're not the same as fresh, and they are too big to roast and >> eat during warm weather. And remember, pork shoulder and boston butt is >> not ham.... if you have to eat those cured you may as well eat Spam. > > So that uncured part of the pig is called "ham?" I've never seen one of > those before and cannot imagine what that would taste like. I suppose > we're just too isolated to ship those here. Nobody would know how to cook > it anyway. Huh?!?!? You wanna know fresh ham, check out your momma's ass. What a moroon! |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Snagged a 8.8# spiral-sliced ham for $10 | General Cooking | |||
? about spiral sliced hams | General Cooking | |||
Spiral-Sliced Ham from Sam's Club | General Cooking | |||
Spiral-sliced ham question | General Cooking | |||
spiral mixers | Sourdough |