Over on uk.food+drink.misc, June Hughes wrote:

> In message >, Mike.. . .
> > writes
> > Following up to Janet Baraclough
> >
> >> People often wrongly self-diagnose themselves as having "an
> allergy"
> > > because they don't understand the term or the physical process. A
> > > food or skin sensitivity,
> >> is not necessarily an allergic reaction.
> >
> > I'm sure that's true but for me the central point here is that if
> > you warn people about nuts, people will present with nut symptoms
> > (its probably a little unfortunate its "nuts" that are the current
> > thing :-)
> >
> A real nut allergy can be fatal.
> > Because of our local idiots I posted this to rec.food.cooking
> > separately, over there its got as far as "liar" " "**** off", oh
> > well.
> >
> Are you surprised? And to think, we pay our taxes to keep these
> low-lifes.

Why does June Hughes call everyone on rec.food.cooking a low-life?

"Pam" > wrote in message
>
> Why does June Hughes call everyone on rec.food.cooking a low-life?

Same reason you are trolling, just to start some crap. In reality, most of
us can't climb up high enough to be a low-life.

"Ed Pawlowski" > wrote in message
news
>
> "Pam" > wrote in message
>>
>> Why does June Hughes call everyone on rec.food.cooking a low-life?
>
> Same reason you are trolling, just to start some crap. In reality, most
> of us can't climb up high enough to be a low-life.


What he said!

"Ed Pawlowski" > wrote in message
news
>
> "Pam" > wrote in message
>>
>> Why does June Hughes call everyone on rec.food.cooking a low-life?
>
> Same reason you are trolling, just to start some crap. In reality, most
> of us can't climb up high enough to be a low-life.
Who the hell is June Hughes?

jmcquown > wrote:

> "Ed Pawlowski" > wrote in message
> news
>>
>> "Pam" > wrote in message
>>>
>>> Why does June Hughes call everyone on rec.food.cooking a low-life?
>>
>> Same reason you are trolling, just to start some crap. In reality, most
>> of us can't climb up high enough to be a low-life.
>
> Who the hell is June Hughes?

Somebody from uk.* judging from the past trolls along these lines.

-sw

-sw

In article >,
"jmcquown" > wrote:

> "Ed Pawlowski" > wrote in message
> news
> >
> > "Pam" > wrote in message
> >>
> >> Why does June Hughes call everyone on rec.food.cooking a low-life?
> >
> > Same reason you are trolling, just to start some crap. In reality, most
> > of us can't climb up high enough to be a low-life.

> Who the hell is June Hughes?

Somebody who posts to that UK group.

I have two pieces of advice:

1. Killfile anything on rfc that is crossposted to the UK group.
2. Killfile privacy.net.

--
Dan Abel
Petaluma, California USA

Dan Abel said...

> In article >,
> "jmcquown" > wrote:
>
>> "Ed Pawlowski" > wrote in message
>> news
>> >
>> > "Pam" > wrote in message
>> >>
>> >> Why does June Hughes call everyone on rec.food.cooking a low-life?
>> >
>> > Same reason you are trolling, just to start some crap. In reality,
>> > most of us can't climb up high enough to be a low-life.
>
>> Who the hell is June Hughes?
>
> Somebody who posts to that UK group.
>
> I have two pieces of advice:
>
> 1. Killfile anything on rfc that is crossposted to the UK group.
> 2. Killfile privacy.net.


I have Xnews set to kill anything crossposted. Been that way for ages.

I've never heard of most of those people, thankfully.

Andy
--
Eat first, talk later.

Andy wrote:
> Dan Abel said...
>
>> In article >,
>> "jmcquown" > wrote:
>>
>>> "Ed Pawlowski" > wrote in message
>>> news >>>> "Pam" > wrote in message
>>>>> Why does June Hughes call everyone on rec.food.cooking a low-life?
>>>> Same reason you are trolling, just to start some crap. In reality,
>>>> most of us can't climb up high enough to be a low-life.
>>> Who the hell is June Hughes?
>> Somebody who posts to that UK group.
>>
>> I have two pieces of advice:
>>
>> 1. Killfile anything on rfc that is crossposted to the UK group.
>> 2. Killfile privacy.net.
>
>
> I have Xnews set to kill anything crossposted. Been that way for ages.
>
> I've never heard of most of those people, thankfully.
>
> Andy

Can anybody tell me how to set up my kill file to nuke crossposts if I
am using firefox to read news?

Tia,
George

Dan Abel > wrote:

> In article >,
> "jmcquown" > wrote:
>
>> "Ed Pawlowski" > wrote in message
>> news
>>>
>>> "Pam" > wrote in message
>>>>
>>>> Why does June Hughes call everyone on rec.food.cooking a low-life?
>>>
>>> Same reason you are trolling, just to start some crap. In reality, most
>>> of us can't climb up high enough to be a low-life.
>
>> Who the hell is June Hughes?
>
> Somebody who posts to that UK group.
>
> I have two pieces of advice:
>
> 1. Killfile anything on rfc that is crossposted to the UK group.
> 2. Killfile privacy.net.

I've had uk.* and aus.* killfiled for a long while (which is why I
only see follwups to the OP). But privacy/net isn't a good
indicator of anything, IMO. It's just a placeholder. You, and a
bunch of other on ba.* are one of the few remaining peoples that use
their real names/addresses.

-sw

On Sat, 25 Apr 2009 14:29:03 -0700, Dan Abel > wrote:

>1. Killfile anything on rfc that is crossposted to the UK group.

spot on, old boy.
--
Mike

On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 12:12:34 +0100, Mike > wrote:


>>1. Killfile anything on rfc that is crossposted to the UK group.
>
>spot on, old boy.

Accept the fact that 90% of what is downloaded isn't worth the time it
took.

Accept the fact that the last 9% are the "old timers" arguing and
insulting each other like a room full of drunk third graders.

Accept the last 1% and enjoy some valid information regarding food and
cooking.

"jmcquown" > wrote in message
...
> "Ed Pawlowski" > wrote in message
> news
>>
>> "Pam" > wrote in message
>>>
>>> Why does June Hughes call everyone on rec.food.cooking a low-life?
>>
>> Same reason you are trolling, just to start some crap. In reality, most
>> of us can't climb up high enough to be a low-life.
> Who the hell is June Hughes?
>

A very nice lady who who posts on uk food group. She has become one of the
targets of a troll, or trolls who revel in obscenities and who must,
therefore, have a small vocabulary and limited intelligence.
Graham

Ed Pawlowski wrote:

>
> "Pam" > wrote in message
> >
> > Why does June Hughes call everyone on rec.food.cooking a low-life?
>
> Same reason you are trolling, just to start some crap. In reality, most of us can't climb up high enough to be a low-life.


http://groups.google.co.uk/group/uk....73272386?hl=en

On Sat, 25 Apr 2009 19:58:50 GMT, "Pam" > wrote:

>Ed Pawlowski wrote:
>
>>
>> "Pam" > wrote in message
>> >
>> > Why does June Hughes call everyone on rec.food.cooking a low-life?
>>
>> Same reason you are trolling, just to start some crap. In reality, most of us can't climb up high enough to be a low-life.
>
>
>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/uk....73272386?hl=en

Hello Pammy, you've just been killfiled

PLONK

btw this wasn't poated to uk.food+drink.misc

"Pam" > wrote in message
...
> Over on uk.food+drink.misc, June Hughes wrote:
>
>> In message >, Mike.. . .
>> > writes
>> > Following up to Janet Baraclough
>> >
>> >> People often wrongly self-diagnose themselves as having "an
>> allergy"
>> > > because they don't understand the term or the physical process. A
>> > > food or skin sensitivity,
>> >> is not necessarily an allergic reaction.
>> >
>> > I'm sure that's true but for me the central point here is that if
>> > you warn people about nuts, people will present with nut symptoms
>> > (its probably a little unfortunate its "nuts" that are the current
>> > thing :-)
>> >
>> A real nut allergy can be fatal.
>> > Because of our local idiots I posted this to rec.food.cooking
>> > separately, over there its got as far as "liar" " "**** off", oh
>> > well.
>> >
>> Are you surprised? And to think, we pay our taxes to keep these
>> low-lifes.
>
> Why does June Hughes call everyone on rec.food.cooking a low-life?
>

More importantly, why should I care?

kimberly

"Nexis" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Pam" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Over on uk.food+drink.misc, June Hughes wrote:
>>
>>> In message >, Mike.. . .
>>> > writes
>>> > Following up to Janet Baraclough
>>> >
>>> >> People often wrongly self-diagnose themselves as having "an
>>> allergy"
>>> > > because they don't understand the term or the physical process. A
>>> > > food or skin sensitivity,
>>> >> is not necessarily an allergic reaction.
>>> >
>>> > I'm sure that's true but for me the central point here is that if
>>> > you warn people about nuts, people will present with nut symptoms
>>> > (its probably a little unfortunate its "nuts" that are the current
>>> > thing :-)
>>> >
>>> A real nut allergy can be fatal.
>>> > Because of our local idiots I posted this to rec.food.cooking
>>> > separately, over there its got as far as "liar" " "**** off", oh
>>> > well.
>>> >
>>> Are you surprised? And to think, we pay our taxes to keep these
>>> low-lifes.
>>
>> Why does June Hughes call everyone on rec.food.cooking a low-life?
>>
>
> More importantly, why should I care?
>
> kimberly
>
>
Who is June Hughes and why does her opinion count? We have enough
self-anointed martinets here without adding another one. I agree with you,
Kimberly....why do we care?
-ginny

"Virginia Tadrzynski" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Nexis" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>> "Pam" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> Over on uk.food+drink.misc, June Hughes wrote:
>>>
>>>> In message >, Mike.. . .
>>>> > writes
>>>> > Following up to Janet Baraclough
>>>> >
>>>> >> People often wrongly self-diagnose themselves as having "an
>>>> allergy"
>>>> > > because they don't understand the term or the physical process. A
>>>> > > food or skin sensitivity,
>>>> >> is not necessarily an allergic reaction.
>>>> >
>>>> > I'm sure that's true but for me the central point here is that if
>>>> > you warn people about nuts, people will present with nut symptoms
>>>> > (its probably a little unfortunate its "nuts" that are the current
>>>> > thing :-)
>>>> >
>>>> A real nut allergy can be fatal.
>>>> > Because of our local idiots I posted this to rec.food.cooking
>>>> > separately, over there its got as far as "liar" " "**** off", oh
>>>> > well.
>>>> >
>>>> Are you surprised? And to think, we pay our taxes to keep these
>>>> low-lifes.
>>>
>>> Why does June Hughes call everyone on rec.food.cooking a low-life?
>>>
>>
>> More importantly, why should I care?
>>
>> kimberly
>>
>>
> Who is June Hughes and why does her opinion count? We have enough
> self-anointed martinets here without adding another one. I agree with
> you, Kimberly....why do we care?
> -ginny
>

Perhaps you should find out the whole story before you "open your mouth"!

On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 22:32:08 -0600, "graham" > wrote:

>Perhaps you should find out the whole story before you "open your mouth"!
>
That's what happens when only part of the story is xposted. Nobody
here cares if an unknown from another ng has bad things to say about
us. But from what I've read, she has been attacked unjustly and is
simply lashing out.

I won't bother to figure out what uk usenet group you're posting from
because if you cared what anyone here says in reply, you'd include
your own group for replies - which only means you're "stirring the
pot".

--
I love cooking with wine.
Sometimes I even put it in the food.

On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 23:12:42 -0700, sf > wrote:

>I won't bother to figure out what uk usenet group you're posting from
>because if you cared what anyone here says in reply, you'd include
>your own group for replies - which only means you're "stirring the
>pot".

wrong! He giving you lot good advice, has it ever occurred to you
there are people who are subscribed to the uk food group *and* this
one and who are telling you to stop helping trolls?
--
Mike

Mike.. . . said...

> Following up to Virginia Tadrzynski
>
>>> More importantly, why should I care?
>>>
>>> kimberly
>>>
>>>
>> Who is June Hughes and why does her opinion count? We have enough
>> self-anointed martinets here without adding another one. I agree with
>> you, Kimberly....why do we care?
>
> correct question is "why are xposting responses to a troll?


This is SOOOOOOO off topic and pitiful in nature that it doesn't merit
responding to. But I had to.

Andy
--
Eat first, talk later.

On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 03:17:15 -0500, Andy > wrote:

>This is SOOOOOOO off topic and pitiful in nature that it doesn't merit
>responding to. But I had to.

well at least you didn't xpost it!
--
Mike

On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 08:57:16 +0100, "Mike.. . ."
> wrote:

>Following up to Virginia Tadrzynski
>
>>> More importantly, why should I care?
>>>
>>> kimberly
>>>
>>>
>> Who is June Hughes and why does her opinion count? We have enough
>> self-anointed martinets here without adding another one. I agree with you,
>> Kimberly....why do we care?
>
>correct question is "why are xposting responses to a troll?

Why have you changed your posting name yet again, troll? You were
"Mike >" a moment ago.

In message >, Nexis >
writes
>
>
>
>"Pam" > wrote in message
...
>> Over on uk.food+drink.misc, June Hughes wrote:
>>
>>> In message >, Mike.. . .
>>> > writes
>>> > Following up to Janet Baraclough
>>> >
>>> >> People often wrongly self-diagnose themselves as having "an
>>> allergy"
>>> > > because they don't understand the term or the physical process. A
>>> > > food or skin sensitivity,
>>> >> is not necessarily an allergic reaction.
>>> >
>>> > I'm sure that's true but for me the central point here is that if
>>> > you warn people about nuts, people will present with nut symptoms
>>> > (its probably a little unfortunate its "nuts" that are the current
>>> > thing :-)
>>> >
>>> A real nut allergy can be fatal.
>>> > Because of our local idiots I posted this to rec.food.cooking
>>> > separately, over there its got as far as "liar" " "**** off", oh
>>> > well.
>>> >
>>> Are you surprised? And to think, we pay our taxes to keep these
>>> low-lifes.
>>
>> Why does June Hughes call everyone on rec.food.cooking a low-life?
>>
>
>More importantly, why should I care?
>
>kimberly
>
>
For the past two weeks, a troll, whose identity I believe I know, been
posting derogatory material about me across several groups on Usenet. As
I only generally post to one group (ukfd) and most people there know me,
I am not worried but I am sorry you have been troubled.

Cross-post removed.
--
June Hughes

June Hughes wrote:
> In message >, Nexis
> > writes
>>
>>
>>
>> "Pam" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> Over on uk.food+drink.misc, June Hughes wrote:
>>>
>>>> In message >, Mike.. .
>>>> . > writes
>>>>> Following up to Janet Baraclough
>>>>>
>>>>>> People often wrongly self-diagnose themselves as having "an
>>>>>> allergy" because they don't understand the term or the physical
>>>>>> process. A food or skin sensitivity,
>>>>>> is not necessarily an allergic reaction.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm sure that's true but for me the central point here is that if
>>>>> you warn people about nuts, people will present with nut symptoms
>>>>> (its probably a little unfortunate its "nuts" that are the current
>>>>> thing :-)
>>>>>
>>>> A real nut allergy can be fatal.
>>>>> Because of our local idiots I posted this to rec.food.cooking
>>>>> separately, over there its got as far as "liar" " "**** off", oh
>>>>> well.
>>>>>
>>>> Are you surprised? And to think, we pay our taxes to keep these
>>>> low-lifes.
>>>
>>> Why does June Hughes call everyone on rec.food.cooking a low-life?
>>>
>>
>> More importantly, why should I care?
>>
>> kimberly
>>
>>
> For the past two weeks, a troll, whose identity I believe I know, been
> posting derogatory material about me across several groups on Usenet.
> As I only generally post to one group (ukfd) and most people there
> know me, I am not worried but I am sorry you have been troubled.
>
> Cross-post removed.

What she says is the truth!

On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 08:32:27 +0100, "Ophelia" >
wrote:

>What she says is the truth!

indeed
--
Mike

Mike wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 08:32:27 +0100, "Ophelia" >
> wrote:
>
>> What she says is the truth!
>
> indeed

Hmmm just to clarify, June Hughes is telling the truth. I can assure you
that she is not interested in posting here, nor has she been stirring up
trouble here.

On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 09:06:07 +0100, Mike > wrote:

>On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 08:32:27 +0100, "Ophelia" >
>wrote:
>
>>What she says is the truth!
>
>indeed

Why should anyone listen to the opinions of a troll?

In article >,
"Ophelia" > wrote:

> June Hughes wrote:

> >> "Pam" > wrote in message
> >> ...

> >>> Why does June Hughes [deleted]

> > For the past two weeks, a troll, whose identity I believe I know, been
> > posting derogatory material about me across several groups on Usenet.
> > As I only generally post to one group (ukfd) and most people there
> > know me, I am not worried but I am sorry you have been troubled.

Thanks, June. And I am sorry that you have been troubled.

> What she says is the truth!

I'll give my advice again:

1. Killfile crossposts to rfc and ukfd.
2. Killfile posts from privacy.net.

Would you concur with that advice, Ophelia?

I dropped in on ukfd a couple of times. It seems like a nice group, if
you are interested in ukfd. It's not that group, it's a few people who
are looking to stir up trouble by crossposting to both groups. And
there are legit posts using privacy.net, so you will lose those, too.
But privacy.net is not a real Email address, it is for people who don't
want to use a real Email address. Some of those people are trolls.

--
Dan Abel
Petaluma, California USA

Dan Abel wrote:
!
>
> I'll give my advice again:
>
> 1. Killfile crossposts to rfc and ukfd.
> 2. Killfile posts from privacy.net.
>
> Would you concur with that advice, Ophelia?

I mostly certainly would Dan!!

> I dropped in on ukfd a couple of times. It seems like a nice group,
> if you are interested in ukfd. It's not that group, it's a few
> people who are looking to stir up trouble by crossposting to both
> groups. And there are legit posts using privacy.net, so you will
> lose those, too. But privacy.net is not a real Email address, it is
> for people who don't want to use a real Email address. Some of those
> people are trolls.

Agreed!

On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 10:56:31 -0700, Dan Abel > wrote:


>I'll give my advice again:
>
>1. Killfile crossposts to rfc and ukfd.
>2. Killfile posts from privacy.net.

Agreed. And killfile the Mike Reid troll too. He uses many, many
different posting names, but it's not too difficult to killfile him
when you know how.

On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 10:56:31 -0700, Dan Abel > wrote:

>1. Killfile crossposts to rfc and ukfd.

Yes

>2. Killfile posts from privacy.net.

no

>Would you concur with that advice, Ophelia?
>
>I dropped in on ukfd a couple of times. It seems like a nice group, if
>you are interested in ukfd. It's not that group, it's a few people who
>are looking to stir up trouble by crossposting to both groups.

indeed


>And there are legit posts using privacy.net, so you will lose those, too.
>But privacy.net is not a real Email address, it is for people who don't
>want to use a real Email address. Some of those people are trolls.

as are many with "real" (or look real) email address. I don't think
the email address tells you anything much, the xpost does as does the
*content*. There can after all be perfectly valid xposts between two
food groups although in this case the object is to flood ukfd with
material from rfc.
--
Spanish food "http://www.fell-walker.co.uk/espania.htm"
(remove clothing to email)