"maxine" > wrote in message
...
On May 22, 3:53 pm, ChattyCathy > wrote:
> Mark Thorson wrote:
> > ChattyCathy wrote:
>
> >> Heh. He could be related to my ex-DH. If I sent the ex-DH to the
> >> store for some iceburg lettuce, he'd come home with a cabbage.
>
> > Maybe this was his way to discourage requests
> > to pick up stuff at the store.
>
> Nah. He honestly didn't know the difference (just by looking). He did
> admit that iceburg lettuce tasted 'a bit different' from cabbage, I'll
> give him that. However, one can't always taste produce before buying,
> and he never did...
>
> Consequently, I (eventually) gave up putting lettuce on the shopping
> list if he was going to the store.

Give him a break. There are times when I still come home with
cilantro instead of parsley.

maxine in ri

Then taste a leaf. Soap? Wrong one.

On Sat, 23 May 2009 11:59:51 -0500, Omelet wrote:

> In article >,
> blake murphy > wrote:
>
>>> Someone sent me this by e-mail:
>>>
>>> http://i44.tinypic.com/29erxw2.jpg
>>>
>>> You are correct. We are doomed!
>>
>> don't you think it possible that person had his (non-meat) tongue in his
>> cheek?
>>
>> your pal,
>> blake
>
> I wish it were that easy, but there are far too many children growing up
> at the moment that don't even know their veggies grow on plants.
>
> Unfortunately, I'm not kidding.

well, i think you were punk'd. it fits in too well with your wish to
believe people who are anti-hunting are stupid.

your pal,
blake

On Sat, 23 May 2009 18:12:21 -0500, Chemiker wrote:

> On Sat, 23 May 2009 08:31:49 -0700 (PDT), maxine >
> wrote:
>
>>On May 23, 12:56*am, sf > wrote:
>>> On Fri, 22 May 2009 21:53:16 +0200, ChattyCathy
>>>
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>> >Consequently, I (eventually) gave up putting lettuce on the shopping
>>> >list if he was going to the store.
>>>
>>> I guess he didn't believe in reading shelf labels or asking the
>>> grocers either.
>>
>>Some men just refuse to ask a question. Present company excepted, of
>>course.
>>(don't beat me!)
>>
> MRF!
>
> I think I am offended! *I* know the difference
> between a cabbage and a ------- what was it?--------
> that other green thing.
>
> Alex, searching for mizuma!

eh, they're both round and they're both green. be glad the guy didn't come
home with brussels sprouts.

your pal,
blake

On Sat, 23 May 2009 11:56:30 -0500, Omelet wrote:

> In article >,
> "Kswck" > wrote:
>
>> "Omelet" > wrote in message
>> news
>>> In article >,
>>> Damsel > wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Fri, 22 May 2009 19:17:15 -0500, Omelet >
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> >Someone sent me this by e-mail:
>>>> >
>>>> >http://i44.tinypic.com/29erxw2.jpg
>>>> >
>>>> >You are correct. We are doomed!
>>>>
>>>> Oh. My. God.
>>>
>>> <laughs>
>>>
>>> The scary thing is is that these people _vote_.
>>> --
>>> Peace! Om
>>>
>>
>> The scarier thing is that they reproduce.
>
> Thanks for making my day... I'm still chuckling. :-)

um...do you have kids?

your pal,
blake

"blake murphy" > wrote in message
.. .
> On Sat, 23 May 2009 11:56:30 -0500, Omelet wrote:
>> "Kswck" > wrote:
>
>>> The scarier thing is that they reproduce.
>>
>> Thanks for making my day... I'm still chuckling. :-)
>
> um...do you have kids?
>
Let's hope-to-****-not

In article >,
blake murphy > wrote:

> On Sat, 23 May 2009 11:59:51 -0500, Omelet wrote:
>
> > In article >,
> > blake murphy > wrote:
> >
> >>> Someone sent me this by e-mail:
> >>>
> >>> http://i44.tinypic.com/29erxw2.jpg
> >>>
> >>> You are correct. We are doomed!
> >>
> >> don't you think it possible that person had his (non-meat) tongue in his
> >> cheek?
> >>
> >> your pal,
> >> blake
> >
> > I wish it were that easy, but there are far too many children growing up
> > at the moment that don't even know their veggies grow on plants.
> >
> > Unfortunately, I'm not kidding.
>
> well, i think you were punk'd. it fits in too well with your wish to
> believe people who are anti-hunting are stupid.
>
> your pal,
> blake

Uh, Blake, you are reading too much into it. <sigh> I do not and never
have thought that people that were anti-hunting were stupid.

Please don't put words into my mouth.
--
Peace! Om

Life isn't about waiting for the storm to pass.
It's about learning to dance in the rain.
-- Anon.


Subscribe:

On Sun, 24 May 2009 14:18:16 -0500, Omelet >
wrote:

>Please don't put words into my mouth.

S'called, "trolling".
--
mad

Damsel wrote:
> On Sat, 23 May 2009 12:56:23 -0700, Joseph Littleshoes wrote:
>
>
>>Damsel wrote:
>>Escoffier's version calls for an unspecified sausage and beet root
>>leaves and cooking in veal stock. But other wise just like me mums.
>>
>>I make it several times a year and will occasionally add a soupon of
>>mace, nutmeg or cumin to the meat mix.
>
>
> I'd stick with nutmeg. The other two are some of the only spices that
> I truly hate. Thanks for the story.
>
> Carol
>

I am so very fond of mace i have incense made of it. Cumin is a
favorite i could put in almost anything but like you, the elderly
relative don't care for it so i have to go easy on it when i do use it.
Unless i am making a pot of chili then she seems not to mind it.

One of her favorites is tarragon, i occasionally use it in chicken or if
im warming her up a bowl of soup i will put a bit of tarragon in her
bowl but i find it too sweet.
--
JL

On Sun, 24 May 2009 13:49:40 -0700, Joseph Littleshoes
> wrote:

>Damsel wrote:
>> On Sat, 23 May 2009 12:56:23 -0700, Joseph Littleshoes wrote:
>>
>>>Damsel wrote:
>>>Escoffier's version calls for an unspecified sausage and beet root
>>>leaves and cooking in veal stock. But other wise just like me mums.
>>>
>>>I make it several times a year and will occasionally add a soupon of
>>>mace, nutmeg or cumin to the meat mix.
>>
>> I'd stick with nutmeg. The other two are some of the only spices that
>> I truly hate. Thanks for the story.
>
>I am so very fond of mace i have incense made of it. Cumin is a
>favorite i could put in almost anything but like you, the elderly
>relative don't care for it so i have to go easy on it when i do use it.
>Unless i am making a pot of chili then she seems not to mind it.
>
>One of her favorites is tarragon, i occasionally use it in chicken or if
>im warming her up a bowl of soup i will put a bit of tarragon in her
>bowl but i find it too sweet.

I think that she and I would get along great at the table!

Carol

--
Change "invalid" to James Bond's agent number to reply.

On Sun, 24 May 2009 13:06:28 -0700, Mack A. Damia wrote:

> On Sun, 24 May 2009 14:18:16 -0500, Omelet >
> wrote:
>
>>Please don't put words into my mouth.
>
> S'called, "trolling".

i repeat, do you know what 'trolling' means?

blake

On Sun, 24 May 2009 14:18:16 -0500, Omelet wrote:

> In article >,
> blake murphy > wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 23 May 2009 11:59:51 -0500, Omelet wrote:
>>
>>> In article >,
>>> blake murphy > wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Someone sent me this by e-mail:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://i44.tinypic.com/29erxw2.jpg
>>>>>
>>>>> You are correct. We are doomed!
>>>>
>>>> don't you think it possible that person had his (non-meat) tongue in his
>>>> cheek?
>>>>
>>>> your pal,
>>>> blake
>>>
>>> I wish it were that easy, but there are far too many children growing up
>>> at the moment that don't even know their veggies grow on plants.
>>>
>>> Unfortunately, I'm not kidding.
>>
>> well, i think you were punk'd. it fits in too well with your wish to
>> believe people who are anti-hunting are stupid.
>>
>> your pal,
>> blake
>
> Uh, Blake, you are reading too much into it. <sigh> I do not and never
> have thought that people that were anti-hunting were stupid.
>
> Please don't put words into my mouth.

o.k., the last part was uncalled for. but do you really think whoever it
was thinks meat is made in stores?

your pal,
blake

In article >,
blake murphy > wrote:

> On Sun, 24 May 2009 14:18:16 -0500, Omelet wrote:
>
> > In article >,
> > blake murphy > wrote:
> >
> >> On Sat, 23 May 2009 11:59:51 -0500, Omelet wrote:
> >>
> >>> In article >,
> >>> blake murphy > wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>> Someone sent me this by e-mail:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> http://i44.tinypic.com/29erxw2.jpg
> >>>>>
> >>>>> You are correct. We are doomed!
> >>>>
> >>>> don't you think it possible that person had his (non-meat) tongue in his
> >>>> cheek?
> >>>>
> >>>> your pal,
> >>>> blake
> >>>
> >>> I wish it were that easy, but there are far too many children growing up
> >>> at the moment that don't even know their veggies grow on plants.
> >>>
> >>> Unfortunately, I'm not kidding.
> >>
> >> well, i think you were punk'd. it fits in too well with your wish to
> >> believe people who are anti-hunting are stupid.
> >>
> >> your pal,
> >> blake
> >
> > Uh, Blake, you are reading too much into it. <sigh> I do not and never
> > have thought that people that were anti-hunting were stupid.
> >
> > Please don't put words into my mouth.
>
> o.k., the last part was uncalled for. but do you really think whoever it
> was thinks meat is made in stores?
>
> your pal,
> blake

You've not talked to some of the people I have lately, so yes, I think
it's entirely possible.

I talked to one of my co-workers who's master gardening clubs work with
one of the local schools. The kids that they work with are amazed when
they find out their food grows on plants.

So why is it hard to believe that some sheltered innocents don't know
that grocery store meat comes from dead animals?
--
Peace! Om

Life isn't about waiting for the storm to pass.
It's about learning to dance in the rain.
-- Anon.


Subscribe:

On Mon, 25 May 2009 15:43:50 GMT, blake murphy
> wrote:

>On Sun, 24 May 2009 13:06:28 -0700, Mack A. Damia wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 24 May 2009 14:18:16 -0500, Omelet >
>> wrote:
>>
>>>Please don't put words into my mouth.
>>
>> S'called, "trolling".
>
>i repeat, do you know what 'trolling' means?
>
>blake

Don't be obtuse, blake.

Back under the bridge, now.
--
mad

Omelet wrote:
> In article >,
> blake murphy > wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 24 May 2009 14:18:16 -0500, Omelet wrote:
>>
>>> In article >,
>>> blake murphy > wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sat, 23 May 2009 11:59:51 -0500, Omelet wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> In article >,
>>>>> blake murphy > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Someone sent me this by e-mail:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://i44.tinypic.com/29erxw2.jpg
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You are correct. We are doomed!
>>>>>> don't you think it possible that person had his (non-meat) tongue in his
>>>>>> cheek?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> your pal,
>>>>>> blake
>>>>> I wish it were that easy, but there are far too many children growing up
>>>>> at the moment that don't even know their veggies grow on plants.
>>>>>
>>>>> Unfortunately, I'm not kidding.
>>>> well, i think you were punk'd. it fits in too well with your wish to
>>>> believe people who are anti-hunting are stupid.
>>>>
>>>> your pal,
>>>> blake
>>> Uh, Blake, you are reading too much into it. <sigh> I do not and never
>>> have thought that people that were anti-hunting were stupid.
>>>
>>> Please don't put words into my mouth.
>> o.k., the last part was uncalled for. but do you really think whoever it
>> was thinks meat is made in stores?
>>
>> your pal,
>> blake
>
> You've not talked to some of the people I have lately, so yes, I think
> it's entirely possible.
>
> I talked to one of my co-workers who's master gardening clubs work with
> one of the local schools. The kids that they work with are amazed when
> they find out their food grows on plants.
>
> So why is it hard to believe that some sheltered innocents don't know
> that grocery store meat comes from dead animals?
Old, old joke. Family decides to take their young children to vacation
on a working farm for a week so they will know where their food comes from.

Ten-year old boy comes across a stack of plastic milk jugs near the
barn, goes running to his mother. "Mom, Mom, come quick, I found a cow's
nest."

On Mon, 25 May 2009 15:43:50 GMT, blake murphy
> wrote:

>On Sun, 24 May 2009 13:06:28 -0700, Mack A. Damia wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 24 May 2009 14:18:16 -0500, Omelet >
>> wrote:
>>
>>>Please don't put words into my mouth.
>>
>> S'called, "trolling".
>
>i repeat, do you know what 'trolling' means?
>
>blake

All he'd have to do is look in the mirror, and he'd know.

Carol

--
Change "invalid" to James Bond's agent number to reply.

In article >,
George Shirley > wrote:

> > You've not talked to some of the people I have lately, so yes, I think
> > it's entirely possible.
> >
> > I talked to one of my co-workers who's master gardening clubs work with
> > one of the local schools. The kids that they work with are amazed when
> > they find out their food grows on plants.
> >
> > So why is it hard to believe that some sheltered innocents don't know
> > that grocery store meat comes from dead animals?
> Old, old joke. Family decides to take their young children to vacation
> on a working farm for a week so they will know where their food comes from.
>
> Ten-year old boy comes across a stack of plastic milk jugs near the
> barn, goes running to his mother. "Mom, Mom, come quick, I found a cow's
> nest."

Okay, that was funny. ;-)
--
Peace! Om

Life isn't about waiting for the storm to pass.
It's about learning to dance in the rain.
-- Anon.


Subscribe:

On Mon, 25 May 2009 08:57:38 -0700, Mack A. Damia wrote:

> On Mon, 25 May 2009 15:43:50 GMT, blake murphy
> > wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 24 May 2009 13:06:28 -0700, Mack A. Damia wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, 24 May 2009 14:18:16 -0500, Omelet >
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Please don't put words into my mouth.
>>>
>>> S'called, "trolling".
>>
>>i repeat, do you know what 'trolling' means?
>>
>>blake
>
> Don't be obtuse, blake.
>
> Back under the bridge, now.

do you know what a usenet troll is or not? if you think i am one, you're
stupider than i thought.

blake

On Tue, 26 May 2009 16:23:01 GMT, blake murphy
> wrote:

>On Mon, 25 May 2009 08:57:38 -0700, Mack A. Damia wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 25 May 2009 15:43:50 GMT, blake murphy
>> > wrote:
>>
>>>On Sun, 24 May 2009 13:06:28 -0700, Mack A. Damia wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sun, 24 May 2009 14:18:16 -0500, Omelet >
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Please don't put words into my mouth.
>>>>
>>>> S'called, "trolling".
>>>
>>>i repeat, do you know what 'trolling' means?
>>>
>>>blake
>>
>> Don't be obtuse, blake.
>>
>> Back under the bridge, now.
>
>do you know what a usenet troll is or not? if you think i am one, you're
>stupider than i thought.

blake, blake, blake........I've been on Usenet for ten years, now, and
I've been though it ALL with others about trolls, etc. There ain't
much that we haven't talked about.

There are a number of definitions for a troll as you would know if you
did your homework. The one I like is any person who repeatedly causes
trouble in a group - as you do on many occasions.

You live under a bridge, have ugly warts and don't change your
underpants, either.
--
mad

On Tue, 26 May 2009 16:23:01 GMT, blake murphy
> wrote:

>On Mon, 25 May 2009 08:57:38 -0700, Mack A. Damia wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 25 May 2009 15:43:50 GMT, blake murphy
>> > wrote:
>>
>>>On Sun, 24 May 2009 13:06:28 -0700, Mack A. Damia wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sun, 24 May 2009 14:18:16 -0500, Omelet >
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Please don't put words into my mouth.
>>>>
>>>> S'called, "trolling".
>>>
>>>i repeat, do you know what 'trolling' means?
>>>
>>>blake
>>
>> Don't be obtuse, blake.
>>
>> Back under the bridge, now.
>
>do you know what a usenet troll is or not? if you think i am one, you're
>stupider than i thought.

Be nice now, Blake. He can't help it if he has a room-temperature IQ.

Carol

--
Change "invalid" to James Bond's agent number to reply.

On Tue, 26 May 2009 09:45:10 -0700, Mack A. Damia wrote:

> On Tue, 26 May 2009 16:23:01 GMT, blake murphy
> > wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 25 May 2009 08:57:38 -0700, Mack A. Damia wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 25 May 2009 15:43:50 GMT, blake murphy
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Sun, 24 May 2009 13:06:28 -0700, Mack A. Damia wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, 24 May 2009 14:18:16 -0500, Omelet >
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Please don't put words into my mouth.
>>>>>
>>>>> S'called, "trolling".
>>>>
>>>>i repeat, do you know what 'trolling' means?
>>>>
>>>>blake
>>>
>>> Don't be obtuse, blake.
>>>
>>> Back under the bridge, now.
>>
>>do you know what a usenet troll is or not? if you think i am one, you're
>>stupider than i thought.
>
> blake, blake, blake........I've been on Usenet for ten years, now, and
> I've been though it ALL with others about trolls, etc. There ain't
> much that we haven't talked about.
>
> There are a number of definitions for a troll as you would know if you
> did your homework. The one I like is any person who repeatedly causes
> trouble in a group - as you do on many occasions.
>
> You live under a bridge, have ugly warts and don't change your
> underpants, either.

i'm not sure how pointing out how foolish you are is 'causing trouble.'

from wiki:

In Internet slang, a troll is someone who posts controversial,
inflammatory, irrelevant or off-topic messages in an online community, such
as an online discussion forum or chat room, with the primary intent of
provoking other users into an emotional response or to generally disrupt
normal on-topic discussion.

since that's not what i do, i will point out once again that you are a
fool.

blake

On Wed, 27 May 2009 16:32:50 GMT, blake murphy
> wrote:

>On Tue, 26 May 2009 09:45:10 -0700, Mack A. Damia wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 26 May 2009 16:23:01 GMT, blake murphy
>> > wrote:
>>
>>>On Mon, 25 May 2009 08:57:38 -0700, Mack A. Damia wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, 25 May 2009 15:43:50 GMT, blake murphy
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Sun, 24 May 2009 13:06:28 -0700, Mack A. Damia wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, 24 May 2009 14:18:16 -0500, Omelet >
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Please don't put words into my mouth.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> S'called, "trolling".
>>>>>
>>>>>i repeat, do you know what 'trolling' means?
>>>>>
>>>>>blake
>>>>
>>>> Don't be obtuse, blake.
>>>>
>>>> Back under the bridge, now.
>>>
>>>do you know what a usenet troll is or not? if you think i am one, you're
>>>stupider than i thought.
>>
>> blake, blake, blake........I've been on Usenet for ten years, now, and
>> I've been though it ALL with others about trolls, etc. There ain't
>> much that we haven't talked about.
>>
>> There are a number of definitions for a troll as you would know if you
>> did your homework. The one I like is any person who repeatedly causes
>> trouble in a group - as you do on many occasions.
>>
>> You live under a bridge, have ugly warts and don't change your
>> underpants, either.
>
>i'm not sure how pointing out how foolish you are is 'causing trouble.'

http://www.ethicalatheist.com/forum/...053c 8e091ff0
>
>from wiki:

Wiki's the LAST word, silly person?

>In Internet slang, a troll is someone who posts controversial,
>inflammatory, irrelevant or off-topic messages in an online community, such
>as an online discussion forum or chat room, with the primary intent of
>provoking other users into an emotional response or to generally disrupt
>normal on-topic discussion.
>
>since that's not what i do, i will point out once again that you are a
>fool.

QED

And that's causing trouble, you putz.

By the way, you don't know this but Gould was an anthropologist. Each
of the sociail sciences has it's own
methods/theories/principles/belief-systems, and anthropologists don't
believe in innate differences in humans

Gould was a good anthropologist, and his works are illuminating - but
he wrote the very-well known 'Mismeasure of Man' as an anthropologist
condemning a theory of innate differences.

If you are a sociologist, you will disagree.

If you are a political scientist, you may have other ideas.

And if you are a psychologist, you blow all of them out of the water.

<*Tintinnabulation*>

Class dismissed. Putz Murphy has detention.
--
mad

"jay" > wrote in message
. ..
> On Mon, 25 May 2009 08:57:38 -0700, Mack A. Damia wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 25 May 2009 15:43:50 GMT, blake murphy
>> > wrote:
>>
>>>On Sun, 24 May 2009 13:06:28 -0700, Mack A. Damia wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sun, 24 May 2009 14:18:16 -0500, Omelet >
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Please don't put words into my mouth.
>>>>
>>>> S'called, "trolling".
>>>
>>>i repeat, do you know what 'trolling' means?
>>>
>>>blake
>>
>> Don't be obtuse, blake.
>>
>> Back under the bridge, now.
>
> Mr.Potato Head Murphy couldn't carry a real trolls NUTS with both hands.
> You are pretty much talking to an empty room with him.

Mmmm hmmm. Sure you are. Nobody has to get close enough to this post to
smell it to know that you pulled it out of your ass.

On Wed, 27 May 2009 12:18:26 -0500, jay > wrote:

>On Mon, 25 May 2009 08:57:38 -0700, Mack A. Damia wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 25 May 2009 15:43:50 GMT, blake murphy
>> > wrote:
>>
>>>On Sun, 24 May 2009 13:06:28 -0700, Mack A. Damia wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sun, 24 May 2009 14:18:16 -0500, Omelet >
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Please don't put words into my mouth.
>>>>
>>>> S'called, "trolling".
>>>
>>>i repeat, do you know what 'trolling' means?
>>>
>>>blake
>>
>> Don't be obtuse, blake.
>>
>> Back under the bridge, now.
>
>Mr.Potato Head Murphy couldn't carry a real trolls NUTS with both hands.
>You are pretty much talking to an empty room with him.

Murphy's Law.

Preamble

"Murphy is a putz"

(I've known a few in my lifetime, and they've all been dorks)

He's one of those Usenet ex-spurts who does a quick Google and becomes
the definitive word on any given subject.

What a hopeless dweeb.
--
mad

Mack A. Damia wrote:
> On Wed, 27 May 2009 12:18:26 -0500, jay > wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 25 May 2009 08:57:38 -0700, Mack A. Damia wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 25 May 2009 15:43:50 GMT, blake murphy
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sun, 24 May 2009 13:06:28 -0700, Mack A. Damia wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, 24 May 2009 14:18:16 -0500, Omelet >
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Please don't put words into my mouth.
>>>>>
>>>>> S'called, "trolling".
>>>>
>>>> i repeat, do you know what 'trolling' means?
>>>>
>>>> blake
>>>
>>> Don't be obtuse, blake.
>>>
>>> Back under the bridge, now.
>>
>> Mr.Potato Head Murphy couldn't carry a real trolls NUTS with both
>> hands. You are pretty much talking to an empty room with him.
>
> Murphy's Law.
>
> Preamble
>
> "Murphy is a putz"
>
> (I've known a few in my lifetime, and they've all been dorks)
>
> He's one of those Usenet ex-spurts who does a quick Google and becomes
> the definitive word on any given subject.
>
> What a hopeless dweeb.

For all your boasting, Blake has more intelligence, humour and kindess than
you have in your little finger!! Bleagh!

"jay" > wrote in message
. ..
> On Mon, 25 May 2009 08:57:38 -0700, Mack A. Damia wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 25 May 2009 15:43:50 GMT, blake murphy
>> > wrote:
>>
>>>On Sun, 24 May 2009 13:06:28 -0700, Mack A. Damia wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sun, 24 May 2009 14:18:16 -0500, Omelet >
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Please don't put words into my mouth.
>>>>
>>>> S'called, "trolling".
>>>
>>>i repeat, do you know what 'trolling' means?
>>>
>>>blake
>>
>> Don't be obtuse, blake.
>>
>> Back under the bridge, now.
>
> Mr.Potato Head Murphy couldn't carry a real trolls NUTS with both hands.
> You are pretty much talking to an empty room with him.

Not entirely empty, what about that redolent stench he leaves.. it's
fortunate he doesn't wear shoes... P-U! LOL

"Ophelia" > wrote

> For all your boasting, Blake has more intelligence, humour and kindess
> than you have in your little finger!! Bleagh!
>

I do hope you know that came out totally backwards. Go ahead and think
about it a bit.

TFM®

On Wed, 27 May 2009 18:37:22 +0100, "Ophelia" >
wrote:

>Mack A. Damia wrote:
>> On Wed, 27 May 2009 12:18:26 -0500, jay > wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 25 May 2009 08:57:38 -0700, Mack A. Damia wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, 25 May 2009 15:43:50 GMT, blake murphy
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, 24 May 2009 13:06:28 -0700, Mack A. Damia wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, 24 May 2009 14:18:16 -0500, Omelet >
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please don't put words into my mouth.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> S'called, "trolling".
>>>>>
>>>>> i repeat, do you know what 'trolling' means?
>>>>>
>>>>> blake
>>>>
>>>> Don't be obtuse, blake.
>>>>
>>>> Back under the bridge, now.
>>>
>>> Mr.Potato Head Murphy couldn't carry a real trolls NUTS with both
>>> hands. You are pretty much talking to an empty room with him.
>>
>> Murphy's Law.
>>
>> Preamble
>>
>> "Murphy is a putz"
>>
>> (I've known a few in my lifetime, and they've all been dorks)
>>
>> He's one of those Usenet ex-spurts who does a quick Google and becomes
>> the definitive word on any given subject.
>>
>> What a hopeless dweeb.
>
>For all your boasting, Blake has more intelligence, humour and kindess than
>you have in your little finger!! Bleagh!

Only if you say so.
--
mad

On Wed, 27 May 2009 18:37:22 +0100, "Ophelia" >
wrote:

>For all your boasting, Blake has more intelligence, humour and kindess than
>you have in your little finger!! Bleagh!

I second that emotion.
Carol

--
Change "invalid" to James Bond's agent number to reply.

On Wed, 27 May 2009 13:56:12 -0400, TFM®
> wrote:

>"Ophelia" > wrote
>
>> For all your boasting, Blake has more intelligence, humour and kindess
>> than you have in your little finger!! Bleagh!
>>
>
>I do hope you know that came out totally backwards. Go ahead and think
>about it a bit.

Oh, poop!

"For all your boasting, Blake has more intelligence, humor and
kindness in his little finger than you have in your entire body.
Bleagh!"

Better?

Carol

--
Change "invalid" to James Bond's agent number to reply.

"Ophelia" wrote:
>
> For all your boasting, Blake has more intelligence, humour and kindess
> than you have in your little finger!! Bleagh!
>
Huh? Oh, figgers it'd be O'Failure.

"jay" wrote:
> Ophelia wrote:
>>
>> Bleagh!
>
> WTF is a Bleagh?
>
That's the sound of disappointment O'Failure makes when her dildo batterys
crap out.

On Wed, 27 May 2009 18:28:54 GMT, "brooklyn1"
> wrote:

>"jay" wrote:
>> Ophelia wrote:
>>>
>>> Bleagh!
>>
>> WTF is a Bleagh?
>>
>That's the sound of disappointment O'Failure makes when her dildo batterys
>crap out.

LOL!
--
mad

Sheldon fantasized:

>>> Don't be obtuse, blake.
>>>
>>> Back under the bridge, now.
>>
>> Mr.Potato Head Murphy couldn't carry a real trolls NUTS with both hands.
>> You are pretty much talking to an empty room with him.
>
> Not entirely empty, what about that redolent stench he leaves.. it's
> fortunate he doesn't wear shoes... P-U! LOL

Mack, I've pretty much stayed out of this little exchange between you and
blake, because I think you both have the ability to be worthwhile and
thoughtful posters here. But I note that your two big supporters in this
sub-thread are retarded-loser jay and Sheldon-the-blathering-ignoramus,
which puts you VERY MUCH on the wrong side.

Bob

On Wed, 27 May 2009 11:59:36 -0700, "Bob Terwilliger"
> wrote:

>Sheldon fantasized:
>
>>>> Don't be obtuse, blake.
>>>>
>>>> Back under the bridge, now.
>>>
>>> Mr.Potato Head Murphy couldn't carry a real trolls NUTS with both hands.
>>> You are pretty much talking to an empty room with him.
>>
>> Not entirely empty, what about that redolent stench he leaves.. it's
>> fortunate he doesn't wear shoes... P-U! LOL
>
>Mack, I've pretty much stayed out of this little exchange between you and
>blake, because I think you both have the ability to be worthwhile and
>thoughtful posters here. But I note that your two big supporters in this
>sub-thread are retarded-loser jay and Sheldon-the-blathering-ignoramus,
>which puts you VERY MUCH on the wrong side.

In that case, we'd better both take a deep breath and think twice
before we post.

Ahhhh.......Usenet. Now I'm curius how the jay/Sheldon hatred
started.
--
mad

"Mack A. Damia" > wrote in message
...
> On Wed, 27 May 2009 11:59:36 -0700, "Bob Terwilliger"
> > wrote:
>
>>Sheldon fantasized:
>>
>>>>> Don't be obtuse, blake.
>>>>>
>>>>> Back under the bridge, now.
>>>>
>>>> Mr.Potato Head Murphy couldn't carry a real trolls NUTS with both
>>>> hands.
>>>> You are pretty much talking to an empty room with him.
>>>
>>> Not entirely empty, what about that redolent stench he leaves.. it's
>>> fortunate he doesn't wear shoes... P-U! LOL
>>
>>Mack, I've pretty much stayed out of this little exchange between you and
>>blake, because I think you both have the ability to be worthwhile and
>>thoughtful posters here. But I note that your two big supporters in this
>>sub-thread are retarded-loser jay and Sheldon-the-blathering-ignoramus,
>>which puts you VERY MUCH on the wrong side.
>
> In that case, we'd better both take a deep breath and think twice
> before we post.
>
> Ahhhh.......Usenet. Now I'm curius how the jay/Sheldon hatred
> started.
> --

Another useful piece of advice: never take advice from Bob ****wiliger. It's
only a matter of time before the fat boy turns vermillion and begins foaming
and spluttering obscenities.

"brooklyn1" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Ophelia" wrote:
>>
>> For all your boasting, Blake has more intelligence, humour and kindess
>> than you have in your little finger!! Bleagh!
>>
> Huh? Oh, figgers it'd be O'Failure.

Also, you're ugly, Sheldon. And then there's your looks.

jay wrote:

>> Mack, I've pretty much stayed out of this little exchange between you and
>> blake, because I think you both have the ability to be worthwhile and
>> thoughtful posters here. But I note that your two big supporters in this
>> sub-thread are retarded-loser jay and Sheldon-the-blathering-ignoramus,
>> which puts you VERY MUCH on the wrong side.
>>
> WTF are you talking about and to whom?

Go look for a clue vendor and see how many clues you can buy from him.
Everybody else knew exactly what I was talking about and to whom. You're the
only one so stupid you didn't comprehend.

Bob

On Wed, 27 May 2009 15:59:22 -0400, "cybercat" >
wrote:

>
>"Mack A. Damia" > wrote in message
.. .
>> On Wed, 27 May 2009 11:59:36 -0700, "Bob Terwilliger"
>> > wrote:
>>
>>>Sheldon fantasized:
>>>
>>>>>> Don't be obtuse, blake.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Back under the bridge, now.
>>>>>
>>>>> Mr.Potato Head Murphy couldn't carry a real trolls NUTS with both
>>>>> hands.
>>>>> You are pretty much talking to an empty room with him.
>>>>
>>>> Not entirely empty, what about that redolent stench he leaves.. it's
>>>> fortunate he doesn't wear shoes... P-U! LOL
>>>
>>>Mack, I've pretty much stayed out of this little exchange between you and
>>>blake, because I think you both have the ability to be worthwhile and
>>>thoughtful posters here. But I note that your two big supporters in this
>>>sub-thread are retarded-loser jay and Sheldon-the-blathering-ignoramus,
>>>which puts you VERY MUCH on the wrong side.
>>
>> In that case, we'd better both take a deep breath and think twice
>> before we post.
>>
>> Ahhhh.......Usenet. Now I'm curius how the jay/Sheldon hatred
>> started.
>> --
>
>Another useful piece of advice: never take advice from Bob ****wiliger. It's
>only a matter of time before the fat boy turns vermillion and begins foaming
>and spluttering obscenities.

Now I'm getting curious - many different factions in here. The group
sitting next to the bathroom thinks they own the place. According to
one troll-groupie I must get approval from them.

Surely there must be a few with multiple accounts/nicks?
--
mad

Mack A. Damia wrote:

> On Wed, 27 May 2009 15:59:22 -0400, "cybercat" >
> wrote:
>
> >
> >"Mack A. Damia" > wrote in message
> .. .
> >> On Wed, 27 May 2009 11:59:36 -0700, "Bob Terwilliger"
> >> > wrote:
> >>
> >>>Sheldon fantasized:
> >>>
> >>>>>> Don't be obtuse, blake.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Back under the bridge, now.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Mr.Potato Head Murphy couldn't carry a real trolls NUTS with both
> >>>>> hands.
> >>>>> You are pretty much talking to an empty room with him.
> >>>>
> >>>> Not entirely empty, what about that redolent stench he leaves.. it's
> >>>> fortunate he doesn't wear shoes... P-U! LOL
> >>>
> >>>Mack, I've pretty much stayed out of this little exchange between you
and
> >>>blake, because I think you both have the ability to be worthwhile and
> >>>thoughtful posters here. But I note that your two big supporters in
this
> >>>sub-thread are retarded-loser jay and Sheldon-the-blathering-ignoramus,
> >>>which puts you VERY MUCH on the wrong side.
> >>
> >> In that case, we'd better both take a deep breath and think twice
> >> before we post.
> >>
> >> Ahhhh.......Usenet. Now I'm curius how the jay/Sheldon hatred
> >> started.
> >> --
> >
> >Another useful piece of advice: never take advice from Bob ****wiliger.
It's
> >only a matter of time before the fat boy turns vermillion and begins
foaming
> >and spluttering obscenities.
>
> Now I'm getting curious - many different factions in here. The group
> sitting next to the bathroom thinks they own the place. According to
> one troll-groupie I must get approval from them.
>
> Surely there must be a few with multiple accounts/nicks?
>

Naw, it's just that some of us - at least in my case - like certain posters
who just happen to *hate* each other...so in can seem kinda "complicated" to
the initiate.

;-)


--
Best
Greg

"Bob Terwilliger" > wrote in message
...
> Sheldon fantasized:
>
>>>> Don't be obtuse, blake.
>>>>
>>>> Back under the bridge, now.
>>>
>>> Mr.Potato Head Murphy couldn't carry a real trolls NUTS with both hands.
>>> You are pretty much talking to an empty room with him.
>>
>> Not entirely empty, what about that redolent stench he leaves.. it's
>> fortunate he doesn't wear shoes... P-U! LOL
>
> Mack, I've pretty much stayed out of this little exchange between you and
> blake, because I think you both have the ability to be worthwhile and
> thoughtful posters here. But I note that your two big supporters in this
> sub-thread are retarded-loser jay and Sheldon-the-blathering-ignoramus,
> which puts you VERY MUCH on the wrong side.


I whole heartedly concur.

TFM®