Christine Dabney wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 09:47:37 -0400, "Jean B." > wrote:
>
>> ChattyCathy wrote:
>>> Kathleen wrote:
>>>
>>>> I swear to god, some days these discussions read like Monty Python
>>>> skits...
>>> <snipped for space>
>>>
>>> Heh. I shoulda known when I saw 70-odd new posts in this thread this
>>> morning...
>>>
>>> But thanks for the laugh.
>>>
>> And here I belatedly added a few posts that were on topic. Geesh.
>> I should have known too.
>
> Yes, seems like every thread turns into a ****ing contest. Geeze
> guys..do ya have to destroy every food thread?????
>
> Back to food....how come no one mentions cereal when you are rushed?
> That seems to be my fall back....
>
> Christine

Heh! I eat cereal as dessert!

--
Jean B.

Jean B. said...

> Christine Dabney wrote:
>> On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 09:47:37 -0400, "Jean B." > wrote:
>>
>>> ChattyCathy wrote:
>>>> Kathleen wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I swear to god, some days these discussions read like Monty Python
>>>>> skits...
>>>> <snipped for space>
>>>>
>>>> Heh. I shoulda known when I saw 70-odd new posts in this thread this
>>>> morning...
>>>>
>>>> But thanks for the laugh.
>>>>
>>> And here I belatedly added a few posts that were on topic. Geesh.
>>> I should have known too.
>>
>> Yes, seems like every thread turns into a ****ing contest. Geeze
>> guys..do ya have to destroy every food thread?????
>>
>> Back to food....how come no one mentions cereal when you are rushed?
>> That seems to be my fall back....
>>
>> Christine
>
> Heh! I eat cereal as dessert!


Cantaloupe and yogurt and cheerios while still in pajamas!

Breakfast can be SO low class.

Andy

ChattyCathy wrote:
> Kathleen wrote:
>
>
>> I swear to god, some days these discussions read like Monty Python
>> skits...
>>
>
> <snipped for space>
>
> Heh. I shoulda known when I saw 70-odd new posts in this thread this
> morning...
>
> But thanks for the laugh.

Cathy, thanks for snipping. I wish more people would do that.


Becca

Andy wrote:
> Jean B. said...
>
>
>>
>> Heh! I eat cereal as dessert!
>>
>
>
> Cantaloupe and yogurt and cheerios while still in pajamas!
>
> Breakfast can be SO low class.
>
> Andy
>

Ever had breakfast while you were nekkid? You do not have to confess
that here, who knows what class that would make you.


Becca <-----not tellin'!

Becca said...

> Andy wrote:
>> Jean B. said...
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Heh! I eat cereal as dessert!
>>>
>>
>>
>> Cantaloupe and yogurt and cheerios while still in pajamas!
>>
>> Breakfast can be SO low class.
>>
>> Andy
>>
>
> Ever had breakfast while you were nekkid? You do not have to confess
> that here, who knows what class that would make you.
>
>
> Becca <-----not tellin'!


I'll do breakfast, lunch and dinner naked!!! Need matching naked females!!!

Andy

On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 14:16:02 -0700, Bob Terwilliger wrote:

> Bob Muncie wrote:
>
>>>> So my lack of responding to your query about proving someone is smart or
>>>> not deserves another round of your bitterness and vitriol?
>>>
>>> Making a clearly-debatable statement and then responding with evasion and
>>> fallacies when challenged on it does indeed merit scorn and ridicule.
>>>
>>>
>>>> I still stand by what I said about your wife. She (unlike you) is a nice
>>>> person. I feel sorry for her.
>>>
>>> I don't feel sorry for *your* wife. She had enough sense to seek out
>>> someone who's more of a man than you are, didn't she? Is her current sex
>>> partner a friend of yours?
>>
>>
>> Given the quality, and meanness of your posts... plonk. I don't feel the
>> need to validate any opinion I hold with someone as little a person as
>> you.
>>
>> Good-bye Bob.
>
> ...And thus Bob Muncie goes from the childish argument, "I'm right because
> you're a doody-head," to an even more childish, "I CAN'T HEAR YOU!
> LA-LA-LA-LA-LA I CAN'T HEAR YOU!"
>
> Way to deal with your problems like an adult, Bob.
>
> Bob

yes. by all means he should deal with them like an adult by calling people
names.

blake

In article >,
"Jean B." > wrote:

> Ed Pawlowski wrote:
> > "Sqwertz" > wrote in message
> > ...
> >> On Fri, 21 Aug 2009 13:00:52 -0400, cybercat wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> I'm going to scramble some eggs.
> >> You can't scramble eggs properly in 5 minutes.
> >>
> >> Lemme guess...Microwave?
> >>
> >> -sw
> >
> > Really? What have I been doing a couple of days a week for the past 40
> > years or so? I put the toast down at the same time I put the egg in the
> > pan
> > and they are both done at the same time.
> >
> >
> I can make an egg sandwich pretty quickly. Fry an egg, seasoned
> in whatever way pleases you. In the meantime partially slit open
> a pita, and put some cheese in it. Slide in now-cooked egg. Voila!

Never tried egg sandwich in a Pita. Cool idea!
--
Peace! Om

"Human nature seems to be to control other people until they put their foot down."
--Steve Rothstein


Subscribe:

On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 10:42:13 -0700, Bob Terwilliger wrote:

> blake wrote:
>
>> on the other hand, calling her 'cyber****' is a mark of triple-nine
>> super-genius.
>
> Why bother with anything more elaborate, when "cyber****" gets the point
> across just fine?
>
> Bob

other than it makes you look like an asshole, no reason at all.

blake

In article >,
Christine Dabney > wrote:

> On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 09:47:37 -0400, "Jean B." > wrote:
>
> >ChattyCathy wrote:
> >> Kathleen wrote:
> >>
> >>> I swear to god, some days these discussions read like Monty Python
> >>> skits...
> >>
> >> <snipped for space>
> >>
> >> Heh. I shoulda known when I saw 70-odd new posts in this thread this
> >> morning...
> >>
> >> But thanks for the laugh.
> >>
> >And here I belatedly added a few posts that were on topic. Geesh.
> > I should have known too.
>
> Yes, seems like every thread turns into a ****ing contest. Geeze
> guys..do ya have to destroy every food thread?????
>
> Back to food....how come no one mentions cereal when you are rushed?
> That seems to be my fall back....
>
> Christine

Dry cereal is ideal for eating on the run. Just pour some out of the
bag into a ziplock.

But, I'll grab some beef jerky instead for the time being. <g>
--
Peace! Om

"Human nature seems to be to control other people until they put their foot down."
--Steve Rothstein


Subscribe:

On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 15:32:50 -0400, Bob Muncie wrote:

> blake murphy wrote:
>> On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 06:57:35 -0400, Bob Muncie wrote:
>>
>>> Bob Terwilliger wrote:
>>>> The Ranger replied to Bob Muncie:
>>>>
>>>>>> Cyber is a rather smart person.
>>>>> No its not even remotely smart. Consistent, yes; but smart -- not even
>>>>> remotely.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sort of like you. Explains volumes.
>>>> Rather than gainsaying Bob's opinion and following with an ad hominem,
>>>> I'll take a different tack, in the hope that Bob can reach some insight
>>>> into how he came to that opinion which seems so far divorced from
>>>> reality. If people work things out on their own, they usually learn more
>>>> effectively.
>>>>
>>>> So, Bob, can you point to any post by cyber**** which made you think it
>>>> was smart? I can't say I've ever seen such a thing from cyber****.
>>>> Maybe we have wildly diverging ideas about what the word "smart" means,
>>>> but I'm curious as to whether you formed your opinion based on something
>>>> cyber**** wrote, or whether it's just your normal habit to assume people
>>>> are smart.
>>>>
>>>> Bob
>>> How bout I point out that your wife left because she couldn't stomach
>>> crap that this post?
>>>
>>> Bob
>>
>> *that* was pretty ****ing weird.
>>
>> your pal,
>> blake
>
> And you felt the need to chime in... for what reason? Are you Bob T's
> sock poppet?
>
> Bob

i was talking about *bob*, not you, you ****ing idiot.

so now i'm both cyber's and bob's sock puppet? i definitely think you
don't know what the term means.

blake

On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 15:04:10 -0700, The Ranger wrote:

> Bob Muncie > wrote in message
> ...
>> blake murphy wrote:
>>> On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 23:54:30 -0700 (PDT), The Ranger wrote:
>>>> On Aug 22, 6:05 pm, Bob Muncie > wrote:
> [minor snippage]
>>> tsk, tsk, ranger. is that how you talk to the daughter-units?
>>>
>> Now that post I can get behind, and you made a good point.
>
> "Behind" what point exactly, you ****ing moron?
>
> All blake did was yank his dog while posting his regular nonsense and you're
> there lapping it up. Sumbitch, you're as dense as a bowling ball.
>
> The Ranger

i see you snipped out your obscene comments. maybe you'd prefer the
daughter-units not see them?

blake

On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 15:35:04 -0400, Bob Muncie wrote:

> Gregory Morrow wrote:
>> blake murphy wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 00:42:15 -0700, Bob Terwilliger wrote:
>>>
>>>> The Ranger replied to Bob Muncie:
>>>>
>>>>>> Cyber is a rather smart person.
>>>>> No its not even remotely smart. Consistent, yes; but smart -- not
>>>>> even remotely.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sort of like you. Explains volumes.
>>>> Rather than gainsaying Bob's opinion and following with an ad
>>>> hominem, I'll take a different tack, in the hope that Bob can reach
>>>> some insight into how he came to that opinion which seems so far
>>>> divorced from reality. If people work things out on their own, they
>>>> usually learn more effectively.
>>>>
>>>> So, Bob, can you point to any post by cyber**** which made you think
>>>> it was smart? I can't say I've ever seen such a thing from
>>>> cyber****. Maybe we have wildly diverging ideas about what the word
>>>> "smart" means, but I'm curious as to whether you formed your opinion
>>>> based on something cyber**** wrote, or whether it's just your normal
>>>> habit to assume people are smart.
>>>>
>>>> Bob
>>> on the other hand, calling her 'cyber****' is a mark of triple-nine
>>> super-genius.
>>
>> May I suggest a _cybercat FAQ_ for the noobies, it'll cut down on all this
>> incessant bickering...
>>
>
> What bickering?
>
> Bob T is acting like a twit, Blake is acting like a sock puppet, and now
> you chime in for little reason.
>
> What bickering?
>
> Bob

for whom am i a sock puppet? i don't think you know what the term means.

<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sockpuppet_%28Internet%29>

blake

Omelet wrote:
> In article >,
> "Jean B." > wrote:
>
>> Ed Pawlowski wrote:
>>> "Sqwertz" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> On Fri, 21 Aug 2009 13:00:52 -0400, cybercat wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> I'm going to scramble some eggs.
>>>> You can't scramble eggs properly in 5 minutes.
>>>>
>>>> Lemme guess...Microwave?
>>>>
>>>> -sw
>>> Really? What have I been doing a couple of days a week for the past 40
>>> years or so? I put the toast down at the same time I put the egg in the
>>> pan
>>> and they are both done at the same time.
>>>
>>>
>> I can make an egg sandwich pretty quickly. Fry an egg, seasoned
>> in whatever way pleases you. In the meantime partially slit open
>> a pita, and put some cheese in it. Slide in now-cooked egg. Voila!
>
> Never tried egg sandwich in a Pita. Cool idea!

I agree. I often make the over easy eggs with bacon on toast as a
sandwich, but often leave it on the plate, and eat with fork and knife.
Using a pita, I could go back to eating it like a sandwich :-)

Bob

blake murphy wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 15:32:50 -0400, Bob Muncie wrote:
>
>> blake murphy wrote:
>>> On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 06:57:35 -0400, Bob Muncie wrote:
>>>
>>>> Bob Terwilliger wrote:
>>>>> The Ranger replied to Bob Muncie:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cyber is a rather smart person.
>>>>>> No its not even remotely smart. Consistent, yes; but smart -- not even
>>>>>> remotely.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sort of like you. Explains volumes.
>>>>> Rather than gainsaying Bob's opinion and following with an ad hominem,
>>>>> I'll take a different tack, in the hope that Bob can reach some insight
>>>>> into how he came to that opinion which seems so far divorced from
>>>>> reality. If people work things out on their own, they usually learn more
>>>>> effectively.
>>>>>
>>>>> So, Bob, can you point to any post by cyber**** which made you think it
>>>>> was smart? I can't say I've ever seen such a thing from cyber****.
>>>>> Maybe we have wildly diverging ideas about what the word "smart" means,
>>>>> but I'm curious as to whether you formed your opinion based on something
>>>>> cyber**** wrote, or whether it's just your normal habit to assume people
>>>>> are smart.
>>>>>
>>>>> Bob
>>>> How bout I point out that your wife left because she couldn't stomach
>>>> crap that this post?
>>>>
>>>> Bob
>>> *that* was pretty ****ing weird.
>>>
>>> your pal,
>>> blake
>> And you felt the need to chime in... for what reason? Are you Bob T's
>> sock poppet?
>>
>> Bob
>
> i was talking about *bob*, not you, you ****ing idiot.
>
> so now i'm both cyber's and bob's sock puppet? i definitely think you
> don't know what the term means.
>
> blake

Okay... I'll accept the idiot part.. just not the F*&King one :-) I was
misreading.

Bob

Jean B. wrote:
> Bob Muncie wrote:
>> Nancy2 wrote:
>>>> And it is also DISGUSTING. Swiss cheese and peanut butter? Ugh.-
>>>> Hide quoted text -
>>>>
>>>> - Show quoted text -
>>>
>>> I know! Everyone knows that peanut butter, mayonnaise and crisp
>>> iceberg lettuce (with salt sprinkled on it) on white bread is the way
>>> to go. Sheesh, some peoples' tastes! >;-)
>>>
>>> N.
>>
>> You forgot to add the banana. Sheesh... Some people ;-)
>>
>> Bob
>
> You forgot to use HEINZ (note the emphasis) sandwich spread instead of
> mayo. Now I add some giardiniera to make it even more pickle-y. (BTW,
> that relish is a decent solution to the dill relish problem.)
>

You make my stomach hurt :-)

Bob

Christine Dabney wrote:
>
> On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 09:47:37 -0400, "Jean B." > wrote:
>
> >ChattyCathy wrote:
> >> Kathleen wrote:
> >>
> >>> I swear to god, some days these discussions read like Monty Python
> >>> skits...
> >>
> >> <snipped for space>
> >>
> >> Heh. I shoulda known when I saw 70-odd new posts in this thread this
> >> morning...
> >>
> >> But thanks for the laugh.
> >>
> >And here I belatedly added a few posts that were on topic. Geesh.
> > I should have known too.
>
> Yes, seems like every thread turns into a ****ing contest. Geeze
> guys..do ya have to destroy every food thread?????
>
> Back to food....how come no one mentions cereal when you are rushed?
> That seems to be my fall back....
>
> Christine

LOL can't eat cereal in the car or on the train, that's why. A breakfast
burrito or quesadillas is more portable.
(But then it's a rare thing for me to be rushed for breakfast anyway
LOL)

"Paco" > wrote in message
...
>
>
> "Bob Muncie" > wrote in message
> ...
>> notbob wrote:
>>> On 2009-08-23, Bob Terwilliger > wrote:
>>>> Bob Muncie wrote:
>>>
>>>>> need to validate any opinion I hold with someone as little a person as
>>>>> you.
>>>>>
>>>>> Good-bye Bob.
>>>> ...And thus Bob Muncie goes from the childish argument, "I'm right
>>>> because
>>>> you're a doody-head," to an even more childish, "I CAN'T HEAR YOU!
>>>> LA-LA-LA-LA-LA I CAN'T HEAR YOU!"
>>>
>>> All right! That's enough. All Bob's go stand in the corner till I
>>> say you can come out. <sheesh>
>>>
>>> nb
>>
>> Okay. I stepped away with the KF. In fact, I wouldn't have seen other
>> Bob's post had you not replied.
>>
>> But the reason why I followed up on your's is you said "all" Bobs, does
>> that include you? If so, there are at a minimum four corners in a room,
>> so there is space for you :-)
>>
>> Bob
>
> What happens if the room is triangular in shape?

Or round?

ElmerF. wrote:
> "Paco" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>> "Bob Muncie" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> notbob wrote:
>>>> On 2009-08-23, Bob Terwilliger > wrote:
>>>>> Bob Muncie wrote:
>>>>>> need to validate any opinion I hold with someone as little a person as
>>>>>> you.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Good-bye Bob.
>>>>> ...And thus Bob Muncie goes from the childish argument, "I'm right
>>>>> because
>>>>> you're a doody-head," to an even more childish, "I CAN'T HEAR YOU!
>>>>> LA-LA-LA-LA-LA I CAN'T HEAR YOU!"
>>>> All right! That's enough. All Bob's go stand in the corner till I
>>>> say you can come out. <sheesh>
>>>>
>>>> nb
>>> Okay. I stepped away with the KF. In fact, I wouldn't have seen other
>>> Bob's post had you not replied.
>>>
>>> But the reason why I followed up on your's is you said "all" Bobs, does
>>> that include you? If so, there are at a minimum four corners in a room,
>>> so there is space for you :-)
>>>
>>> Bob
>> What happens if the room is triangular in shape?
>
> Or round?
>
>

Elmer -

I guess you haven't read the whole thread, or you would not be chiming
in at this point with a weak post.

Bob

"Paco" > wrote in message
...
>> I'm guessing it's a rather low number, so not worth having mentioned.
>>
>> Bob
>
> It was a joke, Bob Muncie. Lighten up. You're sounding cranky again.
> Need a nap?
Or a Midol

ElmerF. wrote:
> "Paco" > wrote in message
> ...
>>> I'm guessing it's a rather low number, so not worth having mentioned.
>>>
>>> Bob
>> It was a joke, Bob Muncie. Lighten up. You're sounding cranky again.
>> Need a nap?
> Or a Midol
>
>

Why is it I am not feeling you? You might want to evaluate response to
your posts... but that's just me.

I actually like to listen... Do you?

Bob

As usual, blake murphy > brayed and brayed
and brayed:
> i see you snipped out your obscene comments. *maybe you'd prefer the
> daughter-units not see them?

**** off, you 3-day-ripe ass-wipe.

The Ranger

On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 07:10:57 -0700, The Ranger wrote:

> Ophelia > wrote in message
> ...
>> "The Ranger" > wrote in message
>>> All blake did was yank his dog while posting his regular nonsense and
>>> you're there lapping it up. Sumbitch, you're as dense as a bowling ball.
>> I am having problems reconciling you with the loving and successful father
>> of daughters who may, one day, read all this
>
> If this is the worst they can dredge up on me then I'm not worried in the
> slightest.
>
> As far as being shocked, they've seen me both as a community leader and cog.
> If you ever meet me, you'll find I'm very much like I post; 3-dimensional
> with rough edges... I don't believe being nice simply to get along. If
> you're a braying mule (Bobbie currently and blake always) then you deserve
> the Clue-By-Four treatment.
>
> The Ranger

i still wonder how come you didn't realize i was such a braying mule until
i criticitized you.

blake

On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 23:01:24 -0700 (PDT), The Ranger wrote:

> As usual, blake murphy > brayed and brayed
> and brayed:
>> i see you snipped out your obscene comments. *maybe you'd prefer the
>> daughter-units not see them?
>
> **** off, you 3-day-ripe ass-wipe.
>
> The Ranger

careful, range, you might alienate the audience for you heartwarming,
slightly-hipper-than-readers-digest tales of your family life.

blake

"blake murphy" > wrote in message
...
> On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 23:01:24 -0700 (PDT), The Ranger wrote:
>
>> As usual, blake murphy > brayed and brayed
>> and brayed:
>>> i see you snipped out your obscene comments. maybe you'd prefer the
>>> daughter-units not see them?
>>
>> **** off, you 3-day-ripe ass-wipe.
>>
>> The Ranger
>
> careful, range, you might alienate the audience for you heartwarming,
> slightly-hipper-than-readers-digest tales of your family life.
>
> blake

He's Dave Barry's and Erma Bombeck's mildy-retarded love-child.

On Tue 25 Aug 2009 11:29:38a, blake murphy told us...

> On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 07:10:57 -0700, The Ranger wrote:
>
>> Ophelia > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> "The Ranger" > wrote in message
>>>> All blake did was yank his dog while posting his regular nonsense and
>>>> you're there lapping it up. Sumbitch, you're as dense as a bowling
>>>> ball.
>>> I am having problems reconciling you with the loving and successful
>>> father of daughters who may, one day, read all this
>>
>> If this is the worst they can dredge up on me then I'm not worried in
>> the slightest.
>>
>> As far as being shocked, they've seen me both as a community leader and
>> cog. If you ever meet me, you'll find I'm very much like I post;
>> 3-dimensional with rough edges... I don't believe being nice simply to
>> get along. If you're a braying mule (Bobbie currently and blake always)
>> then you deserve the Clue-By-Four treatment.
>>
>> The Ranger
>
> i still wonder how come you didn't realize i was such a braying mule
> until i criticitized you.
>
> blake
>

An ass doesn't always recognize a mule. :-)

Personally, I wish he take all his "units" and head for deep space.

--
Wayne Boatwright
------------------------------------------------------------------------
We load up on oat bran in the morning so we'll live forever. Then
we spend the rest of the day living like there's no tomorrow. Lee
Iacocca

On Tue 25 Aug 2009 12:55:06p, news told us...

>
> "blake murphy" > wrote in message
> ...
>> On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 23:01:24 -0700 (PDT), The Ranger wrote:
>>
>>> As usual, blake murphy > brayed and brayed
>>> and brayed:
>>>> i see you snipped out your obscene comments. maybe you'd prefer the
>>>> daughter-units not see them?
>>>
>>> **** off, you 3-day-ripe ass-wipe.
>>>
>>> The Ranger
>>
>> careful, range, you might alienate the audience for you heartwarming,
>> slightly-hipper-than-readers-digest tales of your family life.
>>
>> blake
>
> He's Dave Barry's and Erma Bombeck's mildy-retarded love-child.
>
>
>

He's not *that* good!

--
Wayne Boatwright
------------------------------------------------------------------------
All happiness depends on a leisurely breakfast. John Gunther

Bob Muncie wrote:
> D 1 wrote:
>> Bob Muncie wrote:
>>> Bob Terwilliger wrote:
>>>> The Ranger replied to Bob Muncie:
>>>>
>>>>>> Cyber is a rather smart person.
>>>>>
>>>>> No its not even remotely smart. Consistent, yes; but smart -- not
>>>>> even remotely.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sort of like you. Explains volumes.
>>>>
>>>> Rather than gainsaying Bob's opinion and following with an ad
>>>> hominem, I'll take a different tack, in the hope that Bob can reach
>>>> some insight into how he came to that opinion which seems so far
>>>> divorced from reality. If people work things out on their own, they
>>>> usually learn more effectively.
>>>>
>>>> So, Bob, can you point to any post by cyber**** which made you think
>>>> it was smart? I can't say I've ever seen such a thing from
>>>> cyber****. Maybe we have wildly diverging ideas about what the word
>>>> "smart" means, but I'm curious as to whether you formed your opinion
>>>> based on something cyber**** wrote, or whether it's just your normal
>>>> habit to assume people are smart.
>>>>
>>>> Bob
>>>
>>> How bout I point out that your wife left because she couldn't stomach
>>> crap that this post?
>>>
>>> Bob
>>
>> How "bout" I point out that you are pathetic and can't form a proper
>> sentence?
>>
>> Go play with Shelly.
>>
>> D
>
> By all means.. Feel free to do so. Point out anything you feel is
> worthy. Pathetic is an opinion. We all know where your's lie... by any
> chance, is it part of your forehead?
>
> Bob
>
> Bob

That was dumber than anything I've read from Shelly. Good work, boy!

D

Bob Muncie wrote:
> Omelet wrote:
>> In article >,
>> "Paco" > wrote:
>>
>>> "Bob Muncie" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> notbob wrote:
>>>>> On 2009-08-23, Bob Terwilliger > wrote:
>>>>>> Bob Muncie wrote:
>>>>>>> need to validate any opinion I hold with someone as little a
>>>>>>> person as
>>>>>>> you.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Good-bye Bob.
>>>>>> ...And thus Bob Muncie goes from the childish argument, "I'm right
>>>>>> because
>>>>>> you're a doody-head," to an even more childish, "I CAN'T HEAR YOU!
>>>>>> LA-LA-LA-LA-LA I CAN'T HEAR YOU!"
>>>>> All right! That's enough. All Bob's go stand in the corner till I
>>>>> say you can come out. <sheesh>
>>>>>
>>>>> nb
>>>> Okay. I stepped away with the KF. In fact, I wouldn't have seen
>>>> other Bob's post had you not replied.
>>>>
>>>> But the reason why I followed up on your's is you said "all" Bobs,
>>>> does that include you? If so, there are at a minimum four corners in
>>>> a room, so there is space for you :-)
>>>>
>>>> Bob
>>> What happens if the room is triangular in shape?
>>
>> Or round?
>
> *Now* you chirp in... if it's round, I wold nominate that we chase each
> other around in it in the hopes the slowest one gets caught, and beaten
> to death every time we have a similar blowup such as this.
>
> Bob
>

Are you so dysfunctional that you are affected personally by what you
read in a Usenet post? There are drugs for that, boy.

D

Paco wrote:
>
>
> "Omelet" > wrote in message
> news
>> In article >,
>> "Paco" > wrote:
>>
>>> > Sorry... Just being sensitive as I'm not use to having to modify my KF
>>> > seven times in 24 hours to avoid a lunatic's posts..
>>
>> Get used to it. It happens. <g>
>> I learned to not take things personally here a long time ago, but I've
>> been posting here since 1996...
>>
>>> >
>>> > And no, I do have ample sleep at the moment :-) Just being a bit
>>> touchy
>>> > given the conditions. Sorry if I offended.
>>> >
>>> > Bob
>>>
>>> No offense taken. It's Usenet. Quite akin to the "Wild, Wild
>>> West". To
>>> quote a former poster here and in several other groups, "It's Usenet,
>>> bitch.
>>> Adapt or haul ass."
>>
>> Ooh, I like that!
>> --
>
> Got it from some guy in Florida, who seems to have fallen off of the
> face of the Earth. You heard from him?

He's working and has taken on new interests after work.

D

Bob Muncie wrote:

> But honestly... If it wasn't for nice people like you, I would have
> already not be subscribed to this group.
>
> Bob

"I would have already not be subscribed to this group."?????

Go back to school, Bobbie!

D

Bob Muncie wrote:
> blake murphy wrote:
>> On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 15:32:50 -0400, Bob Muncie wrote:
>>
>>> blake murphy wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 06:57:35 -0400, Bob Muncie wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Bob Terwilliger wrote:
>>>>>> The Ranger replied to Bob Muncie:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Cyber is a rather smart person.
>>>>>>> No its not even remotely smart. Consistent, yes; but smart -- not
>>>>>>> even remotely.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sort of like you. Explains volumes.
>>>>>> Rather than gainsaying Bob's opinion and following with an ad
>>>>>> hominem, I'll take a different tack, in the hope that Bob can
>>>>>> reach some insight into how he came to that opinion which seems so
>>>>>> far divorced from reality. If people work things out on their own,
>>>>>> they usually learn more effectively.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So, Bob, can you point to any post by cyber**** which made you
>>>>>> think it was smart? I can't say I've ever seen such a thing from
>>>>>> cyber****. Maybe we have wildly diverging ideas about what the
>>>>>> word "smart" means, but I'm curious as to whether you formed your
>>>>>> opinion based on something cyber**** wrote, or whether it's just
>>>>>> your normal habit to assume people are smart.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Bob
>>>>> How bout I point out that your wife left because she couldn't
>>>>> stomach crap that this post?
>>>>>
>>>>> Bob
>>>> *that* was pretty ****ing weird.
>>>>
>>>> your pal,
>>>> blake
>>> And you felt the need to chime in... for what reason? Are you Bob T's
>>> sock poppet?
>>>
>>> Bob
>>
>> i was talking about *bob*, not you, you ****ing idiot.
>> so now i'm both cyber's and bob's sock puppet? i definitely think you
>> don't know what the term means.
>>
>> blake
>
> Okay... I'll accept the idiot part.. just not the F*&King one :-) I was
> misreading.
>
> Bob

This is really not a children's forum. Try alt.disney,Bobbie!

D

Omelet wrote:
> In article >,
> "Jean B." > wrote:
>
>> Ed Pawlowski wrote:
>>> "Sqwertz" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> On Fri, 21 Aug 2009 13:00:52 -0400, cybercat wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> I'm going to scramble some eggs.
>>>> You can't scramble eggs properly in 5 minutes.
>>>>
>>>> Lemme guess...Microwave?
>>>>
>>>> -sw
>>> Really? What have I been doing a couple of days a week for the past 40
>>> years or so? I put the toast down at the same time I put the egg in the
>>> pan
>>> and they are both done at the same time.
>>>
>>>
>> I can make an egg sandwich pretty quickly. Fry an egg, seasoned
>> in whatever way pleases you. In the meantime partially slit open
>> a pita, and put some cheese in it. Slide in now-cooked egg. Voila!
>
> Never tried egg sandwich in a Pita. Cool idea!

I do this because there are very LC pitas!

--
Jean B.

In article >,
"Jean B." > wrote:

> Omelet wrote:
> > In article >,
> > "Jean B." > wrote:
> >
> >> Ed Pawlowski wrote:
> >>> "Sqwertz" > wrote in message
> >>> ...
> >>>> On Fri, 21 Aug 2009 13:00:52 -0400, cybercat wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> I'm going to scramble some eggs.
> >>>> You can't scramble eggs properly in 5 minutes.
> >>>>
> >>>> Lemme guess...Microwave?
> >>>>
> >>>> -sw
> >>> Really? What have I been doing a couple of days a week for the past 40
> >>> years or so? I put the toast down at the same time I put the egg in the
> >>> pan
> >>> and they are both done at the same time.
> >>>
> >>>
> >> I can make an egg sandwich pretty quickly. Fry an egg, seasoned
> >> in whatever way pleases you. In the meantime partially slit open
> >> a pita, and put some cheese in it. Slide in now-cooked egg. Voila!
> >
> > Never tried egg sandwich in a Pita. Cool idea!
>
> I do this because there are very LC pitas!

What's the net carb count?
--
Peace! Om

"Human nature seems to be to control other people until they put their foot down."
--Steve Rothstein


Subscribe:

Omelet wrote:
> In article >,
> "Jean B." > wrote:
>
>> Omelet wrote:
>>> In article >,
>>> "Jean B." > wrote:
>>>
>>>> Ed Pawlowski wrote:
>>>>> "Sqwertz" > wrote in message
>>>>> ...
>>>>>> On Fri, 21 Aug 2009 13:00:52 -0400, cybercat wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm going to scramble some eggs.
>>>>>> You can't scramble eggs properly in 5 minutes.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Lemme guess...Microwave?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -sw
>>>>> Really? What have I been doing a couple of days a week for the past 40
>>>>> years or so? I put the toast down at the same time I put the egg in the
>>>>> pan
>>>>> and they are both done at the same time.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> I can make an egg sandwich pretty quickly. Fry an egg, seasoned
>>>> in whatever way pleases you. In the meantime partially slit open
>>>> a pita, and put some cheese in it. Slide in now-cooked egg. Voila!
>>> Never tried egg sandwich in a Pita. Cool idea!
>> I do this because there are very LC pitas!
>
> What's the net carb count?

Only 4 grams. They contain lots of fiber--and flax. I get
Joseph's brand. I don't know whether they are regional. The
flavor is decent. I am NOT so fond of their wraps, alas.

--
Jean B.

In article >,
"Jean B." > wrote:

> Omelet wrote:
> > In article >,
> > "Jean B." > wrote:
> >
> >> Omelet wrote:
> >>> In article >,
> >>> "Jean B." > wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Ed Pawlowski wrote:
> >>>>> "Sqwertz" > wrote in message
> >>>>> ...
> >>>>>> On Fri, 21 Aug 2009 13:00:52 -0400, cybercat wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I'm going to scramble some eggs.
> >>>>>> You can't scramble eggs properly in 5 minutes.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Lemme guess...Microwave?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> -sw
> >>>>> Really? What have I been doing a couple of days a week for the past 40
> >>>>> years or so? I put the toast down at the same time I put the egg in
> >>>>> the
> >>>>> pan
> >>>>> and they are both done at the same time.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>> I can make an egg sandwich pretty quickly. Fry an egg, seasoned
> >>>> in whatever way pleases you. In the meantime partially slit open
> >>>> a pita, and put some cheese in it. Slide in now-cooked egg. Voila!
> >>> Never tried egg sandwich in a Pita. Cool idea!
> >> I do this because there are very LC pitas!
> >
> > What's the net carb count?
>
> Only 4 grams. They contain lots of fiber--and flax. I get
> Joseph's brand. I don't know whether they are regional. The
> flavor is decent. I am NOT so fond of their wraps, alas.

Very cool. I'll have to keep my eyes peeled for those. The rice wraps
are a little over 5 grams!
--
Peace! Om

"Human nature seems to be to control other people until they put their foot down."
--Steve Rothstein


Subscribe:

Omelet wrote:
> Very cool. I'll have to keep my eyes peeled for those. The rice wraps
> are a little over 5 grams!

Is that because they are so thin? I would have thought they'd be
a lot higher!
--
Jean B.

In article >,
"Jean B." > wrote:

> Omelet wrote:
> > Very cool. I'll have to keep my eyes peeled for those. The rice wraps
> > are a little over 5 grams!
>
> Is that because they are so thin? I would have thought they'd be
> a lot higher!

They are almost paper thin. :-)

I did the math, it works. Calculated the package net and counted that
there were 35 papers. 5. something each. 5.4 I think. I posted it in an
earlier post in response to one of he Bobs. Terwillinger iirc.

I post too much. <g>
--
Peace! Om

"Human nature seems to be to control other people until they put their foot down."
--Steve Rothstein


Subscribe:

On Fri, 21 Aug 2009 18:28:19 -0500, Kathleen wrote:

> I took one of the bowls provided, added a squirt of chocolate sauce and
> some peanuts and was headed back to my table when one of the regular
> teachers, a fat broad with a mound of ice cream piled in front of her,
> brayed sarcastically "WHAT, are you just going to drink chocolate sauce?!"
>
> "No, I just wanted some chocolate syrup to dip my banana in. I don't
> much care for ice cream, but I can see you enjoy it, so, more for you, eh?"
>
> Bitch.

Jill, is that you?

-sw

On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 20:14:53 -0400, Bob Muncie wrote:

> nb - Just so you know, I've been around forever (not a newbie), was part
> of the internet (and usenet) when it was in beta mode

Hasn't the Internet and Usenet always been in Beta Mode?

We're always taking it to the extreme, and then some. Especially
here in RFC.

-sw

"Cheryl" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Kalmia" > wrote in message
> ...
>> You know the situation - you suddenly realize you have to leave the
>> house in five minutes for an appointment, you're hungry, you won't be
>> home for hours, no Power Bars on hand, and can't stop on the way to
>> grab a bite. What is your five minute emergency meal?
>>
>> Mine: slap crunchy peanut butter and slice of Swiss, in that order,
>> on a slice of w.w. bread, top brown it for a minute in the toaster
>> oven. Holds body and soul together, filling, no dishes or pans to
>> wash.
>>
>> Yours?
>
> A handful of nuts.
Here ya go... how big are your hands... do you like coconuts? :-o