Not good.

http://urlsnip.com/04428

On Aug 27, 11:53*am, Bobby wrote:
> Not good.
>
> http://urlsnip.com/04428

Worse would have been to eat Brit food.

"NC Gary" > wrote in message
...
On Aug 27, 11:53 am, Bobby wrote:
> Not good.
>
> http://urlsnip.com/04428

>Worse would have been to eat Brit food.

I think I saw some gray porridge and greasy sausage in there.

NC Gary wrote:
> On Aug 27, 11:53 am, Bobby wrote:
>> Not good.
>>
>> http://urlsnip.com/04428
>
> Worse would have been to eat Brit food.

Didn't we Brits send you out there with a basic understanding of what
good food was? When was the last time you ate lamb?

Then you threw the toys out of the pram and invented a rubbish cup
system of measurement that is no good for the rest of the world, or even
the modern USA. Even our colonies of Australia, New Zealand and Canada
use a metric cup :-)

Then you tried to pass off your ignorance of the English language as a
form of English (USA style, before calling it USA English.) and your bad
cholesterol laden way of cooking, as food.

Dave

In article >,
Dave > wrote:

> Then you tried to pass off your ignorance of the English language as a
> form of English (USA style, before calling it USA English.) and your bad
> cholesterol laden way of cooking, as food.

I spit and flick my thumb from my top front teeth in your general
direction, colonialist dog.

leo

> Then you tried to pass off your ignorance of the English language as a
> form of English (USA style, before calling it USA English.)

You must be ****ed that we made it so much better.

and your bad
> cholesterol laden way of cooking, as food.
>


The rest of the world must be in cohoots, since they partake regularly
of our bad food....nobody is forcing anyone anywhere to eat our food.

N.