On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 16:01:00 -0400, Bob Muncie >
wrote:

>But I don't accept "all" cookies. But they are something I can click to
>accept.

I've found it's too annoying to accept cookies every blinking time I
go somewhere. The annoyment for me is how some people feel about
allowing programs when they set up their firewalls... only it never
stops. So allowing them for the session is fine by me. I run CC
occasionally, but not as often as I should. In fact it was so many
months between cleanings I'd forgotten when I'd run it previously -
but no harm. It was just harmless stuff. Most web sites are one time
only for me anyway. I get more bang for my non-buck by running a
registry cleaner every now and then.

--
I love cooking with wine.
Sometimes I even put it in the food.

sf wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 16:01:00 -0400, Bob Muncie >
> wrote:
>
>> But I don't accept "all" cookies. But they are something I can click to
>> accept.
>
> I've found it's too annoying to accept cookies every blinking time I
> go somewhere. The annoyment for me is how some people feel about
> allowing programs when they set up their firewalls... only it never
> stops. So allowing them for the session is fine by me. I run CC
> occasionally, but not as often as I should. In fact it was so many
> months between cleanings I'd forgotten when I'd run it previously -
> but no harm. It was just harmless stuff. Most web sites are one time
> only for me anyway. I get more bang for my non-buck by running a
> registry cleaner every now and then.
>

I do the registry cleaner also sf. I especially use it prior to doing
the monthly backup.

Thanks for your thought posted here. I do listen

Bob

On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 19:38:24 -0400, Bob Muncie >
wrote:

>sf wrote:
>> On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 16:01:00 -0400, Bob Muncie >
>> wrote:
>>
>>> But I don't accept "all" cookies. But they are something I can click to
>>> accept.
>>
>> I've found it's too annoying to accept cookies every blinking time I
>> go somewhere. The annoyment for me is how some people feel about
>> allowing programs when they set up their firewalls... only it never
>> stops. So allowing them for the session is fine by me. I run CC
>> occasionally, but not as often as I should. In fact it was so many
>> months between cleanings I'd forgotten when I'd run it previously -
>> but no harm. It was just harmless stuff. Most web sites are one time
>> only for me anyway. I get more bang for my non-buck by running a
>> registry cleaner every now and then.
>>
>
>I do the registry cleaner also sf. I especially use it prior to doing
>the monthly backup.
>
>Thanks for your thought posted here. I do listen
>
>Bob

I am not a geek at all but I have read all the postings in the thread.
So because you are knowledgeable, should I use my CC and get rid of
all temp files-(in IE I have 5,746 files)? I haven't run CC in over 6
months. BTW I do not mind cookies if it makes it easier to go to a
page where I often buy things, or to CoffeeGeek or places that I visit
often enough.

In case it matters, I run via Dreamweaver, 2 websites because I enjoy
it. One for my business and one for a non-profit.

What's your recommendation? I do like things tidy in general.

Thank you very much.

aloha,
Cea

pure kona wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 19:38:24 -0400, Bob Muncie >
> wrote:
>
>> sf wrote:
>>> On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 16:01:00 -0400, Bob Muncie >
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> But I don't accept "all" cookies. But they are something I can click to
>>>> accept.
>>> I've found it's too annoying to accept cookies every blinking time I
>>> go somewhere. The annoyment for me is how some people feel about
>>> allowing programs when they set up their firewalls... only it never
>>> stops. So allowing them for the session is fine by me. I run CC
>>> occasionally, but not as often as I should. In fact it was so many
>>> months between cleanings I'd forgotten when I'd run it previously -
>>> but no harm. It was just harmless stuff. Most web sites are one time
>>> only for me anyway. I get more bang for my non-buck by running a
>>> registry cleaner every now and then.
>>>
>> I do the registry cleaner also sf. I especially use it prior to doing
>> the monthly backup.
>>
>> Thanks for your thought posted here. I do listen
>>
>> Bob
>
> I am not a geek at all but I have read all the postings in the thread.
> So because you are knowledgeable, should I use my CC and get rid of
> all temp files-(in IE I have 5,746 files)? I haven't run CC in over 6
> months. BTW I do not mind cookies if it makes it easier to go to a
> page where I often buy things, or to CoffeeGeek or places that I visit
> often enough.
>
> In case it matters, I run via Dreamweaver, 2 websites because I enjoy
> it. One for my business and one for a non-profit.
>
> What's your recommendation? I do like things tidy in general.
>
> Thank you very much.
>
> aloha,
> Cea

Pure kona - Since you are asking this, and in the manner you are asking,
I assume you need zero assistance.

What is your need to act like an ass?

Just curious, as I spent most of my time showing I am not one. You?

Bob

On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 23:38:24 -0400, Bob Muncie >
wrote:


>>
>> I am not a geek at all but I have read all the postings in the thread.
>> So because you are knowledgeable, should I use my CC and get rid of
>> all temp files-(in IE I have 5,746 files)? I haven't run CC in over 6
>> months. BTW I do not mind cookies if it makes it easier to go to a
>> page where I often buy things, or to CoffeeGeek or places that I visit
>> often enough.
>>
>> In case it matters, I run via Dreamweaver, 2 websites because I enjoy
>> it. One for my business and one for a non-profit.
>>
>> What's your recommendation? I do like things tidy in general.
>>
>> Thank you very much.
>>
>> aloha,
>> Cea
>
>Pure kona - Since you are asking this, and in the manner you are asking,
>I assume you need zero assistance.
>
>What is your need to act like an ass?
>
>Just curious, as I spent most of my time showing I am not one. You?
>
>Bob

Wow. Sorry I asked. "An ass"??? I am out of here.

Bye.

aloha,
Cea

On 2009-09-01, Christine Dabney > wrote:
>
> Christine, bothered that Cea was called this.

Likewise.

Cea is grower/purveyor of some of the best coffee in US and longtime
uber friendly poster on several groups. Anyone even suggesting Cea is
an ass is ...well... an ass!

nb

notbob wrote:
> On 2009-09-01, Christine Dabney > wrote:
>> Christine, bothered that Cea was called this.
>
> Likewise.
>
> Cea is grower/purveyor of some of the best coffee in US and longtime
> uber friendly poster on several groups. Anyone even suggesting Cea is
> an ass is ...well... an ass!
>
> nb

Thanks for your input nb. I already sent Cea an apology via email. I was
just being overly sensitive at the moment I posted. I'm tired of feeling
defensive.

As your comment will attest.

Bob

On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 22:16:15 -0600, Christine Dabney
> wrote:

>On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 18:07:43 -1000, pure kona >
>wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 23:38:24 -0400, Bob Muncie >
>>wrote:
>
>>>>
>>>> aloha,
>>>> Cea
>>>
>>>Pure kona - Since you are asking this, and in the manner you are asking,
>>>I assume you need zero assistance.
>>>
>>>What is your need to act like an ass?
>>>
>>>Just curious, as I spent most of my time showing I am not one. You?
>>>
>>>Bob
>>
>>Wow. Sorry I asked. "An ass"??? I am out of here.
>>
>>Bye.
>>
>>aloha,
>>Cea
>
>Don't go, Cea!!
>
>Bob, Cea is a longtime poster here..and has been posting much, much
>longer than you have. She is highly respected here. She is NOT an
>ass...no way. And I don't see that she acted like one at all.
>
>Not sure why you are calling her one??
>
>Christine, bothered that Cea was called this.

Thanks Christine and nb, I was very surprised because it was a real
question. Oh well, live and learn I guess---- but thanks to you both
for your kind words ,I feel better.

I was quite shocked and then figured I had better things to do--like
change my sheets

Have a good night your selves.

aloha,
Cea

pure kona wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 22:16:15 -0600, Christine Dabney
> > wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 18:07:43 -1000, pure kona >
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 23:38:24 -0400, Bob Muncie >
>>> wrote:
>>>>> aloha,
>>>>> Cea
>>>> Pure kona - Since you are asking this, and in the manner you are asking,
>>>> I assume you need zero assistance.
>>>>
>>>> What is your need to act like an ass?
>>>>
>>>> Just curious, as I spent most of my time showing I am not one. You?
>>>>
>>>> Bob
>>> Wow. Sorry I asked. "An ass"??? I am out of here.
>>>
>>> Bye.
>>>
>>> aloha,
>>> Cea
>> Don't go, Cea!!
>>
>> Bob, Cea is a longtime poster here..and has been posting much, much
>> longer than you have. She is highly respected here. She is NOT an
>> ass...no way. And I don't see that she acted like one at all.
>>
>> Not sure why you are calling her one??
>>
>> Christine, bothered that Cea was called this.
>
> Thanks Christine and nb, I was very surprised because it was a real
> question. Oh well, live and learn I guess---- but thanks to you both
> for your kind words ,I feel better.
>
> I was quite shocked and then figured I had better things to do--like
> change my sheets
>
> Have a good night your selves.
>
> aloha,
> Cea

You are making me feel even more guilty.. Stop it!

Read you email.

Bob

On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 03:47:22 -0500, Omelet wrote:

> In article >,
> Sqwertz > wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 30 Aug 2009 19:57:52 -0500, Omelet wrote:
>>
>>> In article >,
>>> Sqwertz > wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sun, 30 Aug 2009 19:29:42 -0500, Omelet wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> In article >,
>>>>> Sqwertz > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Have you tried creating an account at tinypic. And logging in? All
>>>>>> my stuff is still there, but all the ones I put there before I
>>>>>> created my account are mostly gone.
>>>> ...
>>>>>> Picassa sucks. But hey - Google Rules, right?
>>>>>
>>>>> It's easier than tinypic and the links won't die.
>>>>
>>>> I just explained to you why your links die. Did you read the post?
>>>>
>>>> Whatever. Nevermind.
>>>
>>> I have no intention of signing up for more spam by having to log into an
>>> account that had animated advertising.
>>>
>>> But, thanks anyway.
>>
>> More unsubstantiated speculation. I get no spam from the account I
>> created there.
>>
>> What I love about my mail server is that I can attach any arbitrary
>> subdomain to my mail servers domain and if that site starts sending
>> me spam, I'd know.
>>
>> For example, I signed up with the email address
>> ". If anything ever comes to that email
>> address I will receive it and know exactly who gave them that email
>> address. Then I have the option of filtering out anything that
>> comes to that address.
>>
>> Can't do that with gmail. And tinypic has yet to spam me.
>>
>> Of course you could always just use a bogus email address.
>>
>> I told you the solution to your problem and now you're just making
>> up excuses for not understanding why your links don't stick around.
>>
>> -sw
>
> Steve, I've known for long time why my links did not stay up. I just
> have no wish to sign up for a tinypic account and I really do like the
> gmail albums. More versatile and a LOT faster to upload and I only have
> to upload once per 5 pics which is handy for a long cooking series.
>
> And I can caption them.
>
> Granted, I could caption them with photoshop, but I was able to caption
> with an actual recipe on these.
>
> I just really like it better. :-)

And everything you mention is available with tinypic as well. is
what *I'M* saying.

So how about dinner? ;-)

-sw

On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 03:29:28 -0700, cl wrote:

> Sqwertz wrote:
>
>> I just know I won't be clicking on Picasa links.
>
> I thought you said you KNEW what you were doing? If your system is as
> secure as you say what does it matter what you click on? What a pussy
> you are Steve. No wonder you have went from programming to designing
> toilets. I would call that a negative career upgrade.

Where's my fly swatter?

-sw

Sqwertz wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 03:47:22 -0500, Omelet wrote:
>
>> In article >,
>> Sqwertz > wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, 30 Aug 2009 19:57:52 -0500, Omelet wrote:
>>>
>>>> In article >,
>>>> Sqwertz > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, 30 Aug 2009 19:29:42 -0500, Omelet wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> In article >,
>>>>>> Sqwertz > wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Have you tried creating an account at tinypic. And logging in? All
>>>>>>> my stuff is still there, but all the ones I put there before I
>>>>>>> created my account are mostly gone.
>>>>> ...
>>>>>>> Picassa sucks. But hey - Google Rules, right?
>>>>>> It's easier than tinypic and the links won't die.
>>>>> I just explained to you why your links die. Did you read the post?
>>>>>
>>>>> Whatever. Nevermind.
>>>> I have no intention of signing up for more spam by having to log into an
>>>> account that had animated advertising.
>>>>
>>>> But, thanks anyway.
>>> More unsubstantiated speculation. I get no spam from the account I
>>> created there.
>>>
>>> What I love about my mail server is that I can attach any arbitrary
>>> subdomain to my mail servers domain and if that site starts sending
>>> me spam, I'd know.
>>>
>>> For example, I signed up with the email address
>>> ". If anything ever comes to that email
>>> address I will receive it and know exactly who gave them that email
>>> address. Then I have the option of filtering out anything that
>>> comes to that address.
>>>
>>> Can't do that with gmail. And tinypic has yet to spam me.
>>>
>>> Of course you could always just use a bogus email address.
>>>
>>> I told you the solution to your problem and now you're just making
>>> up excuses for not understanding why your links don't stick around.
>>>
>>> -sw
>> Steve, I've known for long time why my links did not stay up. I just
>> have no wish to sign up for a tinypic account and I really do like the
>> gmail albums. More versatile and a LOT faster to upload and I only have
>> to upload once per 5 pics which is handy for a long cooking series.
>>
>> And I can caption them.
>>
>> Granted, I could caption them with photoshop, but I was able to caption
>> with an actual recipe on these.
>>
>> I just really like it better. :-)
>
> And everything you mention is available with tinypic as well. is
> what *I'M* saying.
>
> So how about dinner? ;-)
>
> -sw

I think it would be more appropriate for a cup of coffee in a way public
place first :-)

But that's just me (I know, could have kept that to myself).

Bob

ObnotFood: There are a ton of software tools out there. We all find
stuff we like (or don't like).

On Tue, 01 Sep 2009 00:40:21 -0400, Bob Muncie >
wrote:

>notbob wrote:
>> On 2009-09-01, Christine Dabney > wrote:
>>> Christine, bothered that Cea was called this.
>>
>> Likewise.
>>
>> Cea is grower/purveyor of some of the best coffee in US and longtime
>> uber friendly poster on several groups. Anyone even suggesting Cea is
>> an ass is ...well... an ass!
>>
>> nb
>
>Thanks for your input nb. I already sent Cea an apology via email. I was
>just being overly sensitive at the moment I posted. I'm tired of feeling
>defensive.
>
>As your comment will attest.
>
You need to kill more posters and respond less, Bob. Your nice is
obviously wearing thin.


--
I love cooking with wine.
Sometimes I even put it in the food.

On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 16:27:59 +0100, Ophelia wrote:

> "blake murphy" > wrote in message
> ...
>> On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 03:29:28 -0700, cl wrote:
>>
>>> Sqwertz wrote:
>>>
>>>> I just know I won't be clicking on Picasa links.
>>>
>>> I thought you said you KNEW what you were doing? If your system is as
>>> secure as you say what does it matter what you click on? What a pussy
>>> you are Steve. No wonder you have went from programming to designing
>>> toilets. I would call that a negative career upgrade.
>>
>> oh, i don't know. programmers are a dime a dozen, if that.
>
> I can understand why someone who knows more about these things, would want
> to explain how they work... but why in the world do they have to be so nasty
> and
> bitchy about it. Do they think it makes them look clever? If so, I have
> some news for them..........

I never said my system was secure. I said the opposite - that I use
nothing except common sense.

You're free to take pot-shots at sqwertz.chickenkiller.com any time
you want.

Mmm. Chicken.

-sw

On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 10:53:40 -0500, Omelet wrote:

> I could comment, but I won't, as I know him personally...

As I explain to all my suppliers and customers when I meet them in
person, "It's great meeting you. Not so much that we can be
buddies, but so we can be curt with each other and not be offended".

Om is a buddy, of course. I need to lay off I guess.

-sw

On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 03:03:23 -0700, cl wrote:

> Sqwertz wrote:
>
>> BTW: My biggest complaints with Picasa is that the site takes longer to load,
>
> Well then your system and/or the isp you are using has problems or both.
> I bet on both.
>
>>has a very awkward and bulky local client,
>
> What local client? I have used picasa with NO local client required.
>
>> and it resizes all your pictures.
>
> Waah says the cry baby. Easy enough to deal with if the viewer is not a
> WUSS like you steve.

<yawn>

-sw

On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 03:06:48 -0700, cl wrote:

> Like you have already made up your defective mind to hate anything but
> tinypic because you cannot handle anything else and cannot stand it that
> someone is not accepting your crappy advise. Unbunch your panties loser.

"Advise"? cl?

Ahh... now I remember you. According to my records you're still
hanging at #32 on my list of kooks.

Wait your turn. There's coffee at the rear of the line.

-sw

On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 03:48:32 -0500, Omelet wrote:

> My borders are put on by me using photoshop.
> I LIKE to frame my pics.

Ouch. Where's my Punch and Judy bank from the Book of Knowledge?

<http://www.icollector.com/Punch-and-Judy-mechanical-bank_i1104270>

Heh. (too lazy to take my own pic)

-sw

On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 10:20:11 -0700 (PDT), sf wrote:

> Ever stop to think that nobody cares that you are completely paranoid?

Use noscript much, do you Barbara?

Go lay down.

-sw

On Sun, 30 Aug 2009 18:25:54 -1000, dsi1 wrote:

>> So what you're saying is, "Ignorance is bliss. And faster, too!"
>>
> My guess is that you're the one exercising ignorance. I'm running Chrome
> on all the default settings which is remarkable. I'll bet you've never
> been able to run a browser without monkeying around with the settings -
> me nether. It's obvious that right out of the box, Chrome suppresses
> scripts and pop-ups and restricts cookies. Please feel free to dick
> around endlessly with your slow, bloated browser in order to get it to
> work properly. :-)

And it's sponsored by Google! It must be ****ing awesome!

Oops. According to the home page, it won't run on XP3.

Bummer.

-sw

On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 03:14:36 -0700, cl wrote:

> Mark Thorson wrote:
>
>> I would not enable Google's cookies under any
>> conditions. People who do are fools, and deserve
>> what they will get.
>
> None of the google functions require cookies to work. I have got ALL
> google functions to work a little earlier with no cookies, and without
> logging in to google. If picasa from google does not work your browser
> or system has other problems.

Bend over, will ya?

-sw

On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 00:08:40 -0400, Bob Muncie wrote:

> Steve - I apologize for mentioning the Bobbie reference. That was Bob T.
> (my bad). But you do use Munchie, and I find that offensive. Please stop.

Must... reeeesist. Muuuuh.... Muuuhhhh... hrmmmph

> I'd like to just share stories, recipes (although I'll have to make them
> up as I don't use them), and camaraderie. I can also help others on
> topics brought up because they are having one problem or another,
> usually doing with technology.

Then why the heck are you getting involved in these conversations?
You're like a Bobbing yellow duck on the middle tier of the
Sqwert-gun shooting Ranger at the Boardwalk on a very busy saturday
night.

> I have no issues with you. If the animosity can stop here, lets.
>
> Not asking for a hug (Cyber - You can kiss my blitz, at least in a nice
> way).

Now I feel bad.

-sw

On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 10:45:51 -0700 (PDT), sf wrote:

> He's rude, crude and knows he embarrasses himself in public. That's
> why he doesn't archive his posts. Nuff said about No Balls Squirtz.

I must have missed it over the last 12 or so years, but I don't
recall your last name, Barbara.

Oh, I remember now. Nevermind.

-sw

Sqwertz wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 00:08:40 -0400, Bob Muncie wrote:
>
>> Steve - I apologize for mentioning the Bobbie reference. That was Bob T.
>> (my bad). But you do use Munchie, and I find that offensive. Please stop.
>
> Must... reeeesist. Muuuuh.... Muuuhhhh... hrmmmph
>
>> I'd like to just share stories, recipes (although I'll have to make them
>> up as I don't use them), and camaraderie. I can also help others on
>> topics brought up because they are having one problem or another,
>> usually doing with technology.
>
> Then why the heck are you getting involved in these conversations?
> You're like a Bobbing yellow duck on the middle tier of the
> Sqwert-gun shooting Ranger at the Boardwalk on a very busy saturday
> night.
>
>> I have no issues with you. If the animosity can stop here, lets.
>>
>> Not asking for a hug (Cyber - You can kiss my blitz, at least in a nice
>> way).
>
> Now I feel bad.
>
> -sw
<sigh> At least I can say I tried.

On Tue, 01 Sep 2009 02:48:43 -0400, Bob Muncie wrote:

> Sqwertz wrote:
>{
> I think it would be more appropriate for a cup of coffee in a way public
> place first :-)

Om has been to my house a couple of times. With guns in her
trunk, even.

I've been walking a very fine line for years now. If she ever gets
a new truck with A/C I'm pretty much ****ed. Err.... I mean.....
"In Trouble".

Gawd, I'm so bad.

-sw

On Tue, 01 Sep 2009 04:33:01 GMT, notbob wrote:

> On 2009-09-01, Christine Dabney > wrote:
>>
>> Christine, bothered that Cea was called this.
>
> Likewise.

He;s on a roll. Don't stop him. He just wants to talk about food
<sniff, sniff>

-sw

Sqwertz wrote:
> On Tue, 01 Sep 2009 02:48:43 -0400, Bob Muncie wrote:
>
>> Sqwertz wrote:
>> {
>> I think it would be more appropriate for a cup of coffee in a way public
>> place first :-)
>
> Om has been to my house a couple of times. With guns in her
> trunk, even.
>
> I've been walking a very fine line for years now. If she ever gets
> a new truck with A/C I'm pretty much ****ed. Err.... I mean.....
> "In Trouble".
>
> Gawd, I'm so bad.
>
> -sw

I'm guessing she regretted keeping them in her trunk.

But that's just, me...

Bob

Sqwertz wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Aug 2009 18:25:54 -1000, dsi1 wrote:
>
>>> So what you're saying is, "Ignorance is bliss. And faster, too!"
>>>
>> My guess is that you're the one exercising ignorance. I'm running Chrome
>> on all the default settings which is remarkable. I'll bet you've never
>> been able to run a browser without monkeying around with the settings -
>> me nether. It's obvious that right out of the box, Chrome suppresses
>> scripts and pop-ups and restricts cookies. Please feel free to dick
>> around endlessly with your slow, bloated browser in order to get it to
>> work properly. :-)
>
> And it's sponsored by Google! It must be ****ing awesome!

Believe me, if it was just another browser, I wouldn't touch it. I'm
well aware about Google - you have no idea.

>
> Oops. According to the home page, it won't run on XP3.
>
> Bummer.

Most guys with average computer skills would be able to do an install.
Looks like you're plum out of luck. Bummer indeed. :-)


>
> -sw

Bob Muncie wrote:
> cl wrote:
>>> Sqwertz wrote:
>>>
>>> You do know it's not possible to log into and use (effectively)
>>> *any* of the google sites having cookies turned off, right?

>> Bullshit Steve. I used all of the google sites earlier successfully
>> with no problems without having to login and with having ALL cookies
>> from google disabled.
>
> Is it okay to assume we both agree that the google stuff is worth pursuing?

I agree with that. Though personally I use flickr.com.

> No need to be mean. No need to be not nice.

I was just correcting the misinformation that steve was attempting to
pass on as truth - see above. While you cannot use google without
logging in if cookies are disabled. You can use the sites without having
to log in with cookies enabled or disabled.

"Sqwertz" > wrote in message
...
> On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 16:27:59 +0100, Ophelia wrote:
>
>> "blake murphy" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 03:29:28 -0700, cl wrote:
>>>
>>>> Sqwertz wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I just know I won't be clicking on Picasa links.
>>>>
>>>> I thought you said you KNEW what you were doing? If your system is as
>>>> secure as you say what does it matter what you click on? What a pussy
>>>> you are Steve. No wonder you have went from programming to designing
>>>> toilets. I would call that a negative career upgrade.
>>>
>>> oh, i don't know. programmers are a dime a dozen, if that.
>>
>> I can understand why someone who knows more about these things, would
>> want
>> to explain how they work... but why in the world do they have to be so
>> nasty
>> and
>> bitchy about it. Do they think it makes them look clever? If so, I have
>> some news for them..........
>
> I never said my system was secure. I said the opposite - that I use
> nothing except common sense.
>
> You're free to take pot-shots at sqwertz.chickenkiller.com any time
> you want.
>
> Mmm. Chicken.

Who me? I wan't having a go at you!

On Tue, 1 Sep 2009 11:50:17 +0100, Ophelia wrote:

> Who me? I wan't having a go at you!

Bummer. You can, you know ;-)

-sw

"Bob Muncie" > wrote in message
...
> Pure kona - Since you are asking this, and in the manner you are asking, I
> assume you need zero assistance.
>
> What is your need to act like an ass?
>
> Just curious, as I spent most of my time showing I am not one. You?

Kona asked a perfectly reasonable question!!!!!!!!!!! Why in the world
would you respond like that????

"Sqwertz" > wrote in message
...
> On Tue, 1 Sep 2009 11:50:17 +0100, Ophelia wrote:
>
>> Who me? I wan't having a go at you!
>
> Bummer. You can, you know ;-)

Shan't!

"Bob Muncie" > wrote in message
...
> pure kona wrote:
>> On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 22:16:15 -0600, Christine Dabney
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 18:07:43 -1000, pure kona >
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 23:38:24 -0400, Bob Muncie >
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> aloha,
>>>>>> Cea
>>>>> Pure kona - Since you are asking this, and in the manner you are
>>>>> asking, I assume you need zero assistance.
>>>>>
>>>>> What is your need to act like an ass?
>>>>>
>>>>> Just curious, as I spent most of my time showing I am not one. You?
>>>>>
>>>>> Bob
>>>> Wow. Sorry I asked. "An ass"??? I am out of here.
>>>>
>>>> Bye.
>>>>
>>>> aloha,
>>>> Cea
>>> Don't go, Cea!!
>>>
>>> Bob, Cea is a longtime poster here..and has been posting much, much
>>> longer than you have. She is highly respected here. She is NOT an
>>> ass...no way. And I don't see that she acted like one at all.
>>> Not sure why you are calling her one??
>>>
>>> Christine, bothered that Cea was called this.
>>
>> Thanks Christine and nb, I was very surprised because it was a real
>> question. Oh well, live and learn I guess---- but thanks to you both
>> for your kind words ,I feel better.
>>
>> I was quite shocked and then figured I had better things to do--like
>> change my sheets
>>
>> Have a good night your selves.
>>
>> aloha,
>> Cea
>
> You are making me feel even more guilty.. Stop it!

So you damned well should!

"Ophelia" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Bob Muncie" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Pure kona - Since you are asking this, and in the manner you are asking,
>> I assume you need zero assistance.
>>
>> What is your need to act like an ass?
>>
>> Just curious, as I spent most of my time showing I am not one. You?
>
> Kona asked a perfectly reasonable question!!!!!!!!!!! Why in the world
> would you respond like that????

And I have never seen Kona be any variety of asshole. And I know my
assholes.

On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 23:38:24 -0400, Bob Muncie wrote:

> pure kona wrote:
>>
>> I am not a geek at all but I have read all the postings in the thread.
>> So because you are knowledgeable, should I use my CC and get rid of
>> all temp files-(in IE I have 5,746 files)? I haven't run CC in over 6
>> months. BTW I do not mind cookies if it makes it easier to go to a
>> page where I often buy things, or to CoffeeGeek or places that I visit
>> often enough.
>>
>> In case it matters, I run via Dreamweaver, 2 websites because I enjoy
>> it. One for my business and one for a non-profit.
>>
>> What's your recommendation? I do like things tidy in general.
>>
>> Thank you very much.
>>
>> aloha,
>> Cea
>
> Pure kona - Since you are asking this, and in the manner you are asking,
> I assume you need zero assistance.
>
> What is your need to act like an ass?
>

how was she an ass? you got a screw loose.

> Just curious, as I spent most of my time showing I am not one. You?
>

on the contrary, most of your posts show you to be an ass or an ass-kisser
by turns.

blake

On Tue, 01 Sep 2009 03:52:17 -0400, Bob Muncie wrote:

> Sqwertz wrote:
>> On Tue, 01 Sep 2009 02:48:43 -0400, Bob Muncie wrote:
>>
>>> Sqwertz wrote:
>>> {
>>> I think it would be more appropriate for a cup of coffee in a way public
>>> place first :-)
>>
>> Om has been to my house a couple of times. With guns in her
>> trunk, even.
>>
>> I've been walking a very fine line for years now. If she ever gets
>> a new truck with A/C I'm pretty much ****ed. Err.... I mean.....
>> "In Trouble".
>>
>> Gawd, I'm so bad.
>>
>> -sw
>
> I'm guessing she regretted keeping them in her trunk.
>
> But that's just, me...
>
> Bob

i suppose this is you striving not to be an ass.

blake

On Tue, 01 Sep 2009 03:39:06 -0400, Bob Muncie wrote:

> Sqwertz wrote:
>> On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 00:08:40 -0400, Bob Muncie wrote:
>>
>>> Steve - I apologize for mentioning the Bobbie reference. That was Bob T.
>>> (my bad). But you do use Munchie, and I find that offensive. Please stop.
>>
>> Must... reeeesist. Muuuuh.... Muuuhhhh... hrmmmph
>>
>>> I'd like to just share stories, recipes (although I'll have to make them
>>> up as I don't use them), and camaraderie. I can also help others on
>>> topics brought up because they are having one problem or another,
>>> usually doing with technology.
>>
>> Then why the heck are you getting involved in these conversations?
>> You're like a Bobbing yellow duck on the middle tier of the
>> Sqwert-gun shooting Ranger at the Boardwalk on a very busy saturday
>> night.
>>
>>> I have no issues with you. If the animosity can stop here, lets.
>>>
>>> Not asking for a hug (Cyber - You can kiss my blitz, at least in a nice
>>> way).
>>
>> Now I feel bad.
>>
>> -sw
> <sigh> At least I can say I tried.

you haven't 'tried' for longer than half an hour at a stretch as far as i
can tell.

blakle

In article >,
Sqwertz > wrote:

> > Steve, I've known for long time why my links did not stay up. I just
> > have no wish to sign up for a tinypic account and I really do like the
> > gmail albums. More versatile and a LOT faster to upload and I only have
> > to upload once per 5 pics which is handy for a long cooking series.
> >
> > And I can caption them.
> >
> > Granted, I could caption them with photoshop, but I was able to caption
> > with an actual recipe on these.
> >
> > I just really like it better. :-)
>
> And everything you mention is available with tinypic as well. is
> what *I'M* saying.

Ok, here is one more reason that I hesitated to mention.
They've suddenly Nanny blocked tinypic at work. Ironic as they have not
blocked youtube!

I sometimes like to share pics with co-workers and (so far), gmail etc.
is still available. ;-)

>
> So how about dinner? ;-)
>
> -sw

Soon's this bloody hot weather cools off! No AC in that ancient beast I
drive. We'll take a meat run to MT too so you can have space to stock
up on what you want.

I like Ironworks, but I'd not mind letting you introduce me to a new
place, so long as they don't serve Indian food! <shudder>
--
Peace! Om

"Human nature seems to be to control other people until they put their foot down."
--Steve Rothstein


Subscribe:

In article >,
Bob Muncie > wrote:

> > So how about dinner? ;-)
> >
> > -sw
>
> I think it would be more appropriate for a cup of coffee in a way public
> place first :-)
>
> But that's just me (I know, could have kept that to myself).
>
> Bob

<lol> I've met Steve in person 3 times now at local Food Group
gatherings. He's quite safe and really a nice person. He just picks on
me like he's a big brother!

But thanks for your concern. :-)
--
Peace! Om

"Human nature seems to be to control other people until they put their foot down."
--Steve Rothstein


Subscribe: