On 2009-09-02, sf > wrote:

> I don't want to see THIS topic anymore. Answer the question.

YOU answer the damn question! It's your friggin newsreader.

Try reading the manual. If you still can't filter the thread get a
newer version of your newsreader. Better yet, spend some money and
buy the real forte newsreader instead of using the cheap-o freebie
version with limited features. Also, there's plenty of open source
readers that don't cost anything and have excellent filtering. If you
insist on using a crappy newsreader, expect crappy results.

nb

On 2009-09-02, Christine Dabney > wrote:

> Sf uses Agent, but a much earlier version.

I said that. Also, if she's using the freebie version, it probably
doesn't have the full filtering feature set. Either way, it's her
choice, not someone else's responsibility.

http://www.newsreaders.com/win/clients.html

There's also 40tude, a very good newsreader with full
filtering/scoring capabilities.

http://www.40tude.com/dialog/

nb

On Wed, 02 Sep 2009 11:32:21 -0600, Christine Dabney
> wrote:

>On Wed, 02 Sep 2009 17:25:19 GMT, notbob > wrote:
>
>>On 2009-09-02, sf > wrote:
>>
>>> I don't want to see THIS topic anymore. Answer the question.
>>
>>YOU answer the damn question! It's your friggin newsreader.
>>
>>Try reading the manual. If you still can't filter the thread get a
>>newer version of your newsreader. Better yet, spend some money and
>>buy the real forte newsreader instead of using the cheap-o freebie
>>version with limited features. Also, there's plenty of open source
>>readers that don't cost anything and have excellent filtering. If you
>>insist on using a crappy newsreader, expect crappy results.
>>
>>nb
>
>Sf uses Agent, but a much earlier version. The newest versions have
>all sorts of ways to filter...and can filter messages with such
>headings as this. Just takes a little playing around with it, and
>experimenting to get it just right..but it isn't hard.
>
>I heartily recommend an update to the newest version.

Yabut, What's that going to do for her personality problem? Does a
new brain come with the update?

Lou

On Wed, 02 Sep 2009 17:25:19 GMT, notbob > wrote:

>On 2009-09-02, sf > wrote:
>
>> I don't want to see THIS topic anymore. Answer the question.
>
>YOU answer the damn question! It's your friggin newsreader.
>
>Try reading the manual. If you still can't filter the thread get a
>newer version of your newsreader. Better yet, spend some money and
>buy the real forte newsreader instead of using the cheap-o freebie
>version with limited features. Also, there's plenty of open source
>readers that don't cost anything and have excellent filtering. If you
>insist on using a crappy newsreader, expect crappy results.
>
Bite me. I paid for this version. All the rest of your diatribe is
crap.

--
I love cooking with wine.
Sometimes I even put it in the food.

On Wed, 02 Sep 2009 11:32:21 -0600, Christine Dabney
> wrote:

>Sf uses Agent, but a much earlier version. The newest versions have
>all sorts of ways to filter...and can filter messages with such
>headings as this. Just takes a little playing around with it, and
>experimenting to get it just right..but it isn't hard.

So will this version if I know the right string to enter. He was
playing know it all, and I asked him to put his money where his mouth
is. He doesn't know how to filter an empty subject line with a
string, so he can stop changing what I'm talking about just to suit
his purpose of feeling superior.
>
>I heartily recommend an update to the newest versio

I got the answer elsewhere and will apply the filter after I send this
message.


--
I love cooking with wine.
Sometimes I even put it in the food.

On Wed, 02 Sep 2009 18:05:37 GMT, notbob > wrote:

>I said that. Also, if she's using the freebie version, it probably
>doesn't have the full filtering feature set. Either way, it's her
>choice, not someone else's responsibility.

Do your homework. It's not a freebie version. You can stop feeling
superior now, shit or get off the pot.

--
I love cooking with wine.
Sometimes I even put it in the food.

On Wed, 02 Sep 2009 13:05:58 -0500, Lou Decruss
> wrote:

>Yabut, What's that going to do for her personality problem? Does a
>new brain come with the update?

Bite me asshole.

--
I love cooking with wine.
Sometimes I even put it in the food.

On Wed, 02 Sep 2009 13:48:30 -0700, sf > wrote:

-->On Wed, 02 Sep 2009 11:32:21 -0600, Christine Dane
> wrote:
-->
-->>S uses Agent, but a much earlier version. The newest versions have
-->>all sorts of ways to filter...and can filter messages with such
-->>headings as this. Just takes a little playing around with it, and
-->>experimenting to get it just right..but it isn't hard.
-->
-->So will this version if I know the right string to enter. He was
-->playing know it all, and I asked him to put his money where his mouth
-->is. He doesn't know how to filter an empty subject line with a
-->string, so he can stop changing what I'm talking about just to suit
-->his purpose of feeling superior.


The newer versions are to me not as user friendly or configurable as my version
5.2 .... It can filter three ways, and I have no problem setting up filters
for any
thread. If fact, it has both usenet filters and email filters.


-->>
-->>I heartily recommend an update to the newest version
-->
-->I got the answer elsewhere and will apply the filter after I send this
-->message.

On Wed, 02 Sep 2009 13:37:05 -0700, sf > wrote:

-->On Wed, 02 Sep 2009 17:25:19 GMT, notbob > wrote:
-->
-->>On 2009-09-02, sf > wrote:
-->>
-->>> I don't want to see THIS topic anymore. Answer the question.
-->>
-->>YOU answer the damn question! It's your friggin newsreader.
-->>
-->>Try reading the manual. If you still can't filter the thread get a
-->>newer version of your newsreader. Better yet, spend some money and
-->>buy the real forte newsreader instead of using the cheap-o freebie
-->>version with limited features. Also, there's plenty of open source
-->>readers that don't cost anything and have excellent filtering. If you
-->>insist on using a crappy newsreader, expect crappy results.
-->>
-->Bite me. I paid for this version. All the rest of your diatribe is
-->crap.

Even the non paid version is complete and useable, you just have to put up with
the ads.

"sf" > wrote in message
...
> On Wed, 02 Sep 2009 13:05:58 -0500, Lou Decruss
> > wrote:
>
>>Yabut, What's that going to do for her personality problem? Does a
>>new brain come with the update?
>
> Bite me asshole.
>

Are you covered with little bites now? ---your fellow graduate of the
Usenet School of Charm.

On 2009-09-02, sf > wrote:

> Bite me. I paid for this version. All the rest of your diatribe is
> crap.

But I know how to use my filter!

nb

Lou Decruss wrote:

> On Wed, 02 Sep 2009 11:32:21 -0600, Christine Dabney
> > wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 02 Sep 2009 17:25:19 GMT, notbob > wrote:
>>
>>> On 2009-09-02, sf > wrote:
>>>
>>>> I don't want to see THIS topic anymore. Answer the question.
>>>
>>> YOU answer the damn question! It's your friggin newsreader.
>>>
>>> Try reading the manual. If you still can't filter the thread get a
>>> newer version of your newsreader. Better yet, spend some money and
>>> buy the real forte newsreader instead of using the cheap-o freebie
>>> version with limited features. Also, there's plenty of open source
>>> readers that don't cost anything and have excellent filtering. If
>>> you insist on using a crappy newsreader, expect crappy results.
>>>
>>> nb
>>
>> Sf uses Agent, but a much earlier version. The newest versions have
>> all sorts of ways to filter...and can filter messages with such
>> headings as this. Just takes a little playing around with it, and
>> experimenting to get it just right..but it isn't hard.
>>
>> I heartily recommend an update to the newest version.
>
> Yabut, What's that going to do for her personality problem? Does a
> new brain come with the update?


<chortle>


--
Best
Greg