![]() |
Website for simple recipes
I am sure it seems a bit bad to promote your own website, but I think
you would like it. I write http://easypeasymeals.com which is a collection of over 70 recipes (and growing) which are meant for people who can't cook very well to be able to feed themselves without phoning the local take away or pouring out a jar. Its generally light-hearted but does try to provide good simple recipes. I also have a section with food-related (and hopefully humourous) anecdotes to read. Hope you take a look and like it Steve |
Website for simple recipes
easypeasymeals wrote:
> I am sure it seems a bit bad to promote your own website, but I think > you would like it. > > I write http://easypeasymeals.com which is a collection of over 70 > recipes (and growing) which are meant for people who can't cook very > well to be able to feed themselves without phoning the local take away > or pouring out a jar. > > Its generally light-hearted but does try to provide good simple > recipes. I also have a section with food-related (and hopefully > humourous) anecdotes to read. > > Hope you take a look and like it > > Steve At least you aren't trying to SELL anything. I have no problem with people promoting recipes sites that aren't filled with SPAM :) Jill |
Website for simple recipes
"jmcquown" > wrote in message .. . > easypeasymeals wrote: > > I am sure it seems a bit bad to promote your own website, but I think > > you would like it. > > > > I write http://easypeasymeals.com which is a collection of over 70 > > recipes (and growing) which are meant for people who can't cook very > > well to be able to feed themselves without phoning the local take away > > or pouring out a jar. > > > > Its generally light-hearted but does try to provide good simple > > recipes. I also have a section with food-related (and hopefully > > humourous) anecdotes to read. > > > > Hope you take a look and like it > > > > Steve > > At least you aren't trying to SELL anything. I have no problem with people > promoting recipes sites that aren't filled with SPAM :) I have no problem with a newsgroup announcement of a web site, whether it is commercial or non commercial, as long as it is honest, relevant and not done continuously. After an initial announcement I think it the mention of a web site should be limited to a brief line or two in the signature below a posted message. What I do find reprehensible are O.T. commercial announcements and the dishonest postings that say something like "You should visit this great web site I found where I got great deals and big savings!" |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:46 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FoodBanter