Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wayne > wrote:
>Little further needs to be said about the Frug's TV show and cookbooks. >Most agree that they were well-received. > >Now that he's gone, there's little to be gained from a continuing diatribe >on unproven accusations. Out-of-court settlements are not admissions of >guilt. > >I'm sorry that he was in ill health for so long, and sorry that he's now >gone. I can't/won't offer a further opinion since it really doesn't matter >anymore. Thank God ... finally, the voice of reason. I think Lucretia must have some latent issues that need tending to. |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wayne > wrote:
>Little further needs to be said about the Frug's TV show and cookbooks. >Most agree that they were well-received. > >Now that he's gone, there's little to be gained from a continuing diatribe >on unproven accusations. Out-of-court settlements are not admissions of >guilt. > >I'm sorry that he was in ill health for so long, and sorry that he's now >gone. I can't/won't offer a further opinion since it really doesn't matter >anymore. Thank God ... finally, the voice of reason. I think Lucretia must have some latent issues that need tending to. |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Wayne" > wrote in message
... > Little further needs to be said about the Frug's TV show and cookbooks. > Most agree that they were well-received. > > Now that he's gone, there's little to be gained from a continuing diatribe > on unproven accusations. Out-of-court settlements are not admissions of > guilt. > > I'm sorry that he was in ill health for so long, and sorry that he's now > gone. I can't/won't offer a further opinion since it really doesn't matter > anymore. > Interestingly, if you head on over to another on-line food group, you'll find just one poster who insists on focusing on an unproven aspect of his life. The others of the 40-50+ posters accepted his failings as a human, and chose to focus on his contributions to cooking. Ah, but the other is a food/cooking group, while this is a kitchen table. I guess that is where the difference lies. FWIW, I will always have fond memories of watching his shows with my parents. We would drool over whatever he was cooking and loved that he often cooked foods that were not usually seen on cooking shows. rona -- ***For e-mail, replace .com with .ca Sorry for the inconvenience!*** |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Wayne" > wrote in message
... > Little further needs to be said about the Frug's TV show and cookbooks. > Most agree that they were well-received. > > Now that he's gone, there's little to be gained from a continuing diatribe > on unproven accusations. Out-of-court settlements are not admissions of > guilt. > > I'm sorry that he was in ill health for so long, and sorry that he's now > gone. I can't/won't offer a further opinion since it really doesn't matter > anymore. > Interestingly, if you head on over to another on-line food group, you'll find just one poster who insists on focusing on an unproven aspect of his life. The others of the 40-50+ posters accepted his failings as a human, and chose to focus on his contributions to cooking. Ah, but the other is a food/cooking group, while this is a kitchen table. I guess that is where the difference lies. FWIW, I will always have fond memories of watching his shows with my parents. We would drool over whatever he was cooking and loved that he often cooked foods that were not usually seen on cooking shows. rona -- ***For e-mail, replace .com with .ca Sorry for the inconvenience!*** |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Rona Yuthasastrakosol" > wrote in
: > "Wayne" > wrote in message > ... >> Little further needs to be said about the Frug's TV show and >> cookbooks. Most agree that they were well-received. >> >> Now that he's gone, there's little to be gained from a continuing >> diatribe on unproven accusations. Out-of-court settlements are not >> admissions of guilt. >> >> I'm sorry that he was in ill health for so long, and sorry that he's >> now gone. I can't/won't offer a further opinion since it really >> doesn't > matter >> anymore. >> > > Interestingly, if you head on over to another on-line food group, > you'll find just one poster who insists on focusing on an unproven > aspect of his life. The others of the 40-50+ posters accepted his > failings as a human, and chose to focus on his contributions to > cooking. Ah, but the other is a food/cooking group, while this is a > kitchen table. I guess that is where the difference lies. > > FWIW, I will always have fond memories of watching his shows with my > parents. We would drool over whatever he was cooking and loved that > he often cooked foods that were not usually seen on cooking shows. > > rona > Yes, Rona, I've seen what you're talking about. I frequent both groups and, while I enjoy both, I clearly see the differences. OB Food: I made the Frug's French bread this afternoon. -- Wayne in Phoenix If there's a nit to pick, some nitwit will pick it. |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Rona Yuthasastrakosol" > wrote in
: > "Wayne" > wrote in message > ... >> Little further needs to be said about the Frug's TV show and >> cookbooks. Most agree that they were well-received. >> >> Now that he's gone, there's little to be gained from a continuing >> diatribe on unproven accusations. Out-of-court settlements are not >> admissions of guilt. >> >> I'm sorry that he was in ill health for so long, and sorry that he's >> now gone. I can't/won't offer a further opinion since it really >> doesn't > matter >> anymore. >> > > Interestingly, if you head on over to another on-line food group, > you'll find just one poster who insists on focusing on an unproven > aspect of his life. The others of the 40-50+ posters accepted his > failings as a human, and chose to focus on his contributions to > cooking. Ah, but the other is a food/cooking group, while this is a > kitchen table. I guess that is where the difference lies. > > FWIW, I will always have fond memories of watching his shows with my > parents. We would drool over whatever he was cooking and loved that > he often cooked foods that were not usually seen on cooking shows. > > rona > Yes, Rona, I've seen what you're talking about. I frequent both groups and, while I enjoy both, I clearly see the differences. OB Food: I made the Frug's French bread this afternoon. -- Wayne in Phoenix If there's a nit to pick, some nitwit will pick it. |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Steve Wertz > wrote in
: > On Sun, 11 Jul 2004 19:05:39 GMT, Wayne > wrote: > >>Little further needs to be said about the Frug's TV show and >>cookbooks. Most agree that they were well-received. >> >>Now that he's gone, there's little to be gained from a continuing >>diatribe on unproven accusations. Out-of-court settlements are not >>admissions of guilt. > > This is Usenet. Calling and end to something only prolongs it. > > Besides, you keep posting in those threads, so why should people > listen to someone who can't take their own advice? > > -sw > Where exactly did you read that I was calling an end to anything? I only said there was little to be gained. You can be such an ass sometimes, Steve. I post where I see fit, just as you do, apparently. I have not posted anything negative on this topic. Why don't you just killfile me if you don't want to read what I write? It would be much simpler. -- Wayne in Phoenix If there's a nit to pick, some nitwit will pick it. |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Steve Wertz > wrote in
: > On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 00:57:12 GMT, Wayne > wrote: > >>> I said nothing about the quality of you or your posts, and I don't >>> call people asses. >> >>You've called people worse. And, no, don't demand that I prove it. I >>wouldn't waste the time dredging up old posts. > > Because you can't. Other than calling Sheldon a moron/maroon (and > maybe an AOL'er or random spammer), I don't call people names. I wasn't going to look, but you left me no choice. You apparently don't remember the following: > Message-ID: > > From: Steve Wertz > > X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) > X-Accept-Language: en > MIME-Version: 1.0 > Newsgroups: rec.food.cooking > Subject: Prime Rib Roast - The official word -FYI > References: > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > Lines: 16 > NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2002 21:06:58 CDT > Organization: Giganews.Com - Premium News Outsourcing > X-Trace: > sv3-2JYcxMovS50LeBVVhCvnFqowp+VwYfF1LajKZw3uVxIGf5O+Oc WRsMkKL1Vyk8XAD3E > mNPZJqnr8OrM!SFnj3fG5Ck7mKs0sfnJ0xuXv7jbpkUumj16kf 91m6/2X7y0KmI5d+V0= > X-Complaints-To: > X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html > X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers > X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your > complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.1 > Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2002 02:06:58 GMT > > > Dimitri wrote: > >> Dear Dimitri: >> >> Thanks for writing back. The 'prime rib' is an accepted and >> established name for a rib roast. The prime in the name does not >> reflect the grade of the meat. You can buy rib roasts that are USDA >> Choice, USDA Prime, or graded by the store. >> Sincerely, >> Meat and Poultry Hotline > > Does this mean I can take my head out of my ass now? > > Asshole. > > -sw > > >>> Maybe you should be the one killfiling me since you're so uptight >>> about it. >> >>Oh, definitely not. You're much too much fun to "watch"! > > <shrug> can't get enough of me, eh? > > -sw I like most of what you post. -- Wayne in Phoenix If there's a nit to pick, some nitwit will pick it. |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Steve Wertz > wrote in
: > On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 00:57:12 GMT, Wayne > wrote: > >>> I said nothing about the quality of you or your posts, and I don't >>> call people asses. >> >>You've called people worse. And, no, don't demand that I prove it. I >>wouldn't waste the time dredging up old posts. > > Because you can't. Other than calling Sheldon a moron/maroon (and > maybe an AOL'er or random spammer), I don't call people names. I wasn't going to look, but you left me no choice. You apparently don't remember the following: > Message-ID: > > From: Steve Wertz > > X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) > X-Accept-Language: en > MIME-Version: 1.0 > Newsgroups: rec.food.cooking > Subject: Prime Rib Roast - The official word -FYI > References: > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > Lines: 16 > NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2002 21:06:58 CDT > Organization: Giganews.Com - Premium News Outsourcing > X-Trace: > sv3-2JYcxMovS50LeBVVhCvnFqowp+VwYfF1LajKZw3uVxIGf5O+Oc WRsMkKL1Vyk8XAD3E > mNPZJqnr8OrM!SFnj3fG5Ck7mKs0sfnJ0xuXv7jbpkUumj16kf 91m6/2X7y0KmI5d+V0= > X-Complaints-To: > X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html > X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers > X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your > complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.1 > Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2002 02:06:58 GMT > > > Dimitri wrote: > >> Dear Dimitri: >> >> Thanks for writing back. The 'prime rib' is an accepted and >> established name for a rib roast. The prime in the name does not >> reflect the grade of the meat. You can buy rib roasts that are USDA >> Choice, USDA Prime, or graded by the store. >> Sincerely, >> Meat and Poultry Hotline > > Does this mean I can take my head out of my ass now? > > Asshole. > > -sw > > >>> Maybe you should be the one killfiling me since you're so uptight >>> about it. >> >>Oh, definitely not. You're much too much fun to "watch"! > > <shrug> can't get enough of me, eh? > > -sw I like most of what you post. -- Wayne in Phoenix If there's a nit to pick, some nitwit will pick it. |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Wayne" > wrote in message
... : Little further needs to be said about the Frug's TV show and cookbooks. : Most agree that they were well-received. : : Now that he's gone, there's little to be gained from a continuing diatribe : on unproven accusations. Out-of-court settlements are not admissions of : guilt. : : I'm sorry that he was in ill health for so long, and sorry that he's now : gone. I can't/won't offer a further opinion since it really doesn't matter : anymore. : : -- : Wayne in Phoenix ========= Well said Wayne. Well said. -- Cyndi (participating this year at: http://www.heartwalk.kintera.org/2004polkFL ) |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 07:50:41 +0900, "Rona Yuthasastrakosol"
> >Interestingly, if you head on over to another on-line food group, you'll >find just one poster who insists on focusing on an unproven aspect of his >life. The others of the 40-50+ posters accepted his failings as a human, >and chose to focus on his contributions to cooking. Ah, but the other is a >food/cooking group, while this is a kitchen table. I guess that is where >the difference lies. Yes, that was on eGullet. It was a relief to go there and see how people were talking about his contributions to their cooking knowledge, and how they learned to approach food, from his programs. A real joy to read. Christine |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 07:50:41 +0900, "Rona Yuthasastrakosol"
> >Interestingly, if you head on over to another on-line food group, you'll >find just one poster who insists on focusing on an unproven aspect of his >life. The others of the 40-50+ posters accepted his failings as a human, >and chose to focus on his contributions to cooking. Ah, but the other is a >food/cooking group, while this is a kitchen table. I guess that is where >the difference lies. Yes, that was on eGullet. It was a relief to go there and see how people were talking about his contributions to their cooking knowledge, and how they learned to approach food, from his programs. A real joy to read. Christine |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
> he often cooked foods that were not usually seen on cooking shows.
And he HATED tuna casserole! |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
> he often cooked foods that were not usually seen on cooking shows.
And he HATED tuna casserole! |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Christine Dabney > wrote in
: > how they learned to approach food, from his programs. > I just walk up and say..."Hello Food, I'm going to eat you." Works every time. -- Once during Prohibition I was forced to live for days on nothing but food and water. -------- FIELDS, W. C. |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"hahabogus" > wrote in message
... : Christine Dabney > wrote in : : : : > how they learned to approach food, from his programs. : > : : I just walk up and say..."Hello Food, I'm going to eat you." Works every : time. : : -- :============ SNORT!!! -- Cyndi (participating this year at: http://www.heartwalk.kintera.org/2004polkFL ) |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"hahabogus" > wrote in message
... : Christine Dabney > wrote in : : : : > how they learned to approach food, from his programs. : > : : I just walk up and say..."Hello Food, I'm going to eat you." Works every : time. : : -- :============ SNORT!!! -- Cyndi (participating this year at: http://www.heartwalk.kintera.org/2004polkFL ) |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article >,
hahabogus > wrote: > Christine Dabney > wrote in > : > > > how they learned to approach food, from his programs. > > > > I just walk up and say..."Hello Food, I'm going to eat you." Works every > time. Wasn't that from the Honeymooners? Ralph and Norton learning golf. Ralph: "First, Norton, you must address the ball." Norton: "Hello, ball!" -- to respond, change "spamless.invalid" with "optonline.net" please mail OT responses only |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 11 Jul 2004 21:26:35 -0700, Christine Dabney
> wrote: > Yes, that was on eGullet. eGullet.com? Practice safe eating - always use condiments |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 22:52:35 GMT, hahabogus
> wrote: > I just walk up and say..."Hello Food, I'm going to eat you." Works every > time. Ah, the practical approach. Practice safe eating - always use condiments |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 11 Jul 2004 22:53:15 -0500, Steve Wertz
> wrote: > On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 01:30:08 GMT, Wayne > wrote: > > >I wasn't going to look, but you left me no choice. You apparently don't > >remember the following: > > Two years ago. OK, I guess I'm busted. I've, uh - grown up since > then. Yeah - that's it (note that I was returning the comment at > the time, though - fair is fair). > That's sooo true! You're a very different and likeable person these days. > >I like most of what you post. > > You bimbo! ;-) > and I like you both, now stop squabbling. Practice safe eating - always use condiments |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 11 Jul 2004 19:05:39 GMT, Wayne > wrote:
>Little further needs to be said about the Frug's TV show and cookbooks. >Most agree that they were well-received. > >Now that he's gone, there's little to be gained from a continuing diatribe >on unproven accusations. Out-of-court settlements are not admissions of >guilt. > >I'm sorry that he was in ill health for so long, and sorry that he's now >gone. I can't/won't offer a further opinion since it really doesn't matter >anymore. Well put. Thanks for saying what needed to be said. I think that maybe in a small way, we are all better cooks or lovers of cooking after having seen him and his shows. Mark Anthony Ferrante |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
sf > wrote in
news ![]() > On Sun, 11 Jul 2004 21:26:35 -0700, Christine Dabney > > wrote: > >> Yes, that was on eGullet. > > eGullet.com? Yep, the same. -- Wayne in Phoenix If there's a nit to pick, some nitwit will pick it. |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
sf > wrote in
: > On Sun, 11 Jul 2004 22:53:15 -0500, Steve Wertz > > wrote: > >> On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 01:30:08 GMT, Wayne > wrote: >> >> >I wasn't going to look, but you left me no choice. You apparently >> >don't remember the following: >> >> Two years ago. OK, I guess I'm busted. I've, uh - grown up since >> then. Yeah - that's it (note that I was returning the comment at >> the time, though - fair is fair). >> > That's sooo true! You're a very different and likeable > person these days. > >> >I like most of what you post. >> >> You bimbo! ;-) >> > and I like you both, now stop squabbling. Aw, we're just bantering. :-) I like you, too! -- Wayne in Phoenix If there's a nit to pick, some nitwit will pick it. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
REQ: An old Jeff Smith recipe | General Cooking | |||
Jeff Smith the Frugal Gourmet RIP | General Cooking | |||
Jeff Smith: Let him RIP | General Cooking | |||
Jeff Smith - Frugal Gourmet | Recipes | |||
What Ever Happened to Jeff Smith, The Frugal Gourmet? | Wine |