Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mark Thorson wrote:
> According to this document: > > http://www.epa.gov/ttn/atw/coat/mcan/pic-can.pdf > > earlier solvent-based can coatings are being > replaced with UV-cure coatings to comply with > environmental legislation against solvent emissions. When I read some more of that report, I learned that a) at the time of writing, no UV-cure inside coatings had been approved by the FDA because they contain photoinitiators that contaminate the food, and b) FDA does not regulate materials used on the outside of the can so manufacturers are free to use whatever they want. Photoinitiators are chemicals that generate FREE RADICALS when exposed to light. They are used in UV-cure systems to set off the chemical reactions that crosslink the molecules in the coating, turning it from a liquid into a hard solid. You would put that inside your chicken? |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mark Thorson wrote:
> According to this document: > > http://www.epa.gov/ttn/atw/coat/mcan/pic-can.pdf > > earlier solvent-based can coatings are being > replaced with UV-cure coatings to comply with > environmental legislation against solvent emissions. When I read some more of that report, I learned that a) at the time of writing, no UV-cure inside coatings had been approved by the FDA because they contain photoinitiators that contaminate the food, and b) FDA does not regulate materials used on the outside of the can so manufacturers are free to use whatever they want. Photoinitiators are chemicals that generate FREE RADICALS when exposed to light. They are used in UV-cure systems to set off the chemical reactions that crosslink the molecules in the coating, turning it from a liquid into a hard solid. You would put that inside your chicken? |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 25 Jul 2004 22:38:39 GMT, Mark Thorson >
wrote: >According to this document: > >http://www.epa.gov/ttn/atw/coat/mcan/pic-can.pdf <snip> >Even though beer can chicken may have been >safe in the past, that's no guarantee that it remains >a safe method of cooking today. Even if some >beer cans are safe to use, that's no guarantee >that others are not unsafe. Many beer manufacturers >have toll-free hotlines that can advise you on >whether their cans are safe to use. > Hopefully some entrepreneur will come up with a safe "beer can" so people who enjoy this dish can continue to do so. This reminds me of a fuss a few years ago of parents who were packing their kids' lunches in bread bags turned inside out. Supposedly the lettering and pictures on the bags were done with lead-containing ink and people got freaked about contaminating the kids' lunches. For some reason, exposing the kids to the grimy fingerprints of the people who handle the bread bags in the store didn't bother them. I never understood the turning the bags inside out part... Sue(tm) Lead me not into temptation... I can find it myself! |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 25 Jul 2004 22:38:39 GMT, Mark Thorson >
wrote: >According to this document: > >http://www.epa.gov/ttn/atw/coat/mcan/pic-can.pdf <snip> >Even though beer can chicken may have been >safe in the past, that's no guarantee that it remains >a safe method of cooking today. Even if some >beer cans are safe to use, that's no guarantee >that others are not unsafe. Many beer manufacturers >have toll-free hotlines that can advise you on >whether their cans are safe to use. > Hopefully some entrepreneur will come up with a safe "beer can" so people who enjoy this dish can continue to do so. This reminds me of a fuss a few years ago of parents who were packing their kids' lunches in bread bags turned inside out. Supposedly the lettering and pictures on the bags were done with lead-containing ink and people got freaked about contaminating the kids' lunches. For some reason, exposing the kids to the grimy fingerprints of the people who handle the bread bags in the store didn't bother them. I never understood the turning the bags inside out part... Sue(tm) Lead me not into temptation... I can find it myself! |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Just spatchcock your bird.
--Blair "The beer-can thing is the lesser solution." |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Just spatchcock your bird.
--Blair "The beer-can thing is the lesser solution." |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mark Thorson" > wrote in message ... > According to this document: > > http://www.epa.gov/ttn/atw/coat/mcan/pic-can.pdf > <snippage> Thanks for posting this, although my take on beer can chicken is it's a gimmicky way to cook chicken with no benefit over just spatchcocking the bird or even just cutting the bird in half and then grilling. I've tried it and those claims of more tender meat or great taste from the beer/aromatic herbs are over-stated. Jack Cannery |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mark Thorson" > wrote in message ... > According to this document: > > http://www.epa.gov/ttn/atw/coat/mcan/pic-can.pdf > <snippage> Thanks for posting this, although my take on beer can chicken is it's a gimmicky way to cook chicken with no benefit over just spatchcocking the bird or even just cutting the bird in half and then grilling. I've tried it and those claims of more tender meat or great taste from the beer/aromatic herbs are over-stated. Jack Cannery |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article >,
Randy > wrote: > I agree, it is a gimmick that everybody tries once. -RP > They are now selling racks for this. ;-) Holds the chicken upright with the can in the middle. I've thought about buying a can of beer, cutting the top off with a can opener and pouring the beer into a pan in the garden for the slugs, then re-filling the can with chicken stock and some spices and using that instead. :-) K. -- Sprout the Mung Bean to reply... >,,<Cat's Haven Hobby Farm>,,<Katraatcenturyteldotnet>,,< http://cgi6.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dl...user id=katra |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article >,
Randy > wrote: > I agree, it is a gimmick that everybody tries once. -RP > They are now selling racks for this. ;-) Holds the chicken upright with the can in the middle. I've thought about buying a can of beer, cutting the top off with a can opener and pouring the beer into a pan in the garden for the slugs, then re-filling the can with chicken stock and some spices and using that instead. :-) K. -- Sprout the Mung Bean to reply... >,,<Cat's Haven Hobby Farm>,,<Katraatcenturyteldotnet>,,< http://cgi6.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dl...user id=katra |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mark Thorson wrote:
> > Mark Thorson wrote: > > > According to this document: > > > > http://www.epa.gov/ttn/atw/coat/mcan/pic-can.pdf > > > > earlier solvent-based can coatings are being > > replaced with UV-cure coatings to comply with > > environmental legislation against solvent emissions. > > When I read some more of that report, I learned > that a) at the time of writing, no UV-cure inside > coatings had been approved by the FDA because > they contain photoinitiators that contaminate > the food, and b) FDA does not regulate materials > used on the outside of the can so manufacturers > are free to use whatever they want. Photoinitiators > are chemicals that generate FREE RADICALS when > exposed to light. They are used in UV-cure systems > to set off the chemical reactions that crosslink the > molecules in the coating, turning it from a liquid into > a hard solid. > > You would put that inside your chicken? That's why I never threw out my vertical poultry roaster. I work in printing, and have a healthy respect for the MSDS info in our processes. maxine in ri |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mark Thorson wrote:
> > Mark Thorson wrote: > > > According to this document: > > > > http://www.epa.gov/ttn/atw/coat/mcan/pic-can.pdf > > > > earlier solvent-based can coatings are being > > replaced with UV-cure coatings to comply with > > environmental legislation against solvent emissions. > > When I read some more of that report, I learned > that a) at the time of writing, no UV-cure inside > coatings had been approved by the FDA because > they contain photoinitiators that contaminate > the food, and b) FDA does not regulate materials > used on the outside of the can so manufacturers > are free to use whatever they want. Photoinitiators > are chemicals that generate FREE RADICALS when > exposed to light. They are used in UV-cure systems > to set off the chemical reactions that crosslink the > molecules in the coating, turning it from a liquid into > a hard solid. > > You would put that inside your chicken? That's why I never threw out my vertical poultry roaster. I work in printing, and have a healthy respect for the MSDS info in our processes. maxine in ri |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 26 Jul 2004 12:35:25 -0400, maxine in ri >
wrote: >That's why I never threw out my vertical poultry roaster. We recently found one of those, still in the box, at the local thrift store. Crash likes to make game hens, and this will hold four, if I remember correctly. Carol |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 26 Jul 2004 12:35:25 -0400, maxine in ri >
wrote: >That's why I never threw out my vertical poultry roaster. We recently found one of those, still in the box, at the local thrift store. Crash likes to make game hens, and this will hold four, if I remember correctly. Carol |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 26 Jul 2004 12:35:25 -0400, maxine in ri >
wrote: >That's why I never threw out my vertical poultry roaster. We recently found one of those, still in the box, at the local thrift store. Crash likes to make game hens, and this will hold four, if I remember correctly. Carol |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 25 Jul 2004 22:38:39 GMT, Mark Thorson
> wrote: > According to this document: > > http://www.epa.gov/ttn/atw/coat/mcan/pic-can.pdf > I still don't understand the WHY about beer can chicken. It's a waste of good beer and we have those gizmos to stand up the chicken with... Practice safe eating - always use condiments |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 26 Jul 2004 12:55:10 -0500, Damsel in dis Dress
> wrote: > On Mon, 26 Jul 2004 12:35:25 -0400, maxine in ri > > wrote: > > >That's why I never threw out my vertical poultry roaster. > > We recently found one of those, still in the box, at the local thrift > store. Crash likes to make game hens, and this will hold four, if I > remember correctly. > I'm having trouble visualizing 4 cornish hens on one vertical roaster. Next time Crash does it, take a picture and post it on abf! ![]() Practice safe eating - always use condiments |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 26 Jul 2004 12:55:10 -0500, Damsel in dis Dress
> wrote: > On Mon, 26 Jul 2004 12:35:25 -0400, maxine in ri > > wrote: > > >That's why I never threw out my vertical poultry roaster. > > We recently found one of those, still in the box, at the local thrift > store. Crash likes to make game hens, and this will hold four, if I > remember correctly. > I'm having trouble visualizing 4 cornish hens on one vertical roaster. Next time Crash does it, take a picture and post it on abf! ![]() Practice safe eating - always use condiments |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 26 Jul 2004 19:57:41 GMT, sf > wrote:
>I'm having trouble visualizing 4 cornish hens on one >vertical roaster. Next time Crash does it, take a picture >and post it on abf! ![]() Okey-dokey. Carol |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 26 Jul 2004 19:57:41 GMT, sf > wrote:
>I'm having trouble visualizing 4 cornish hens on one >vertical roaster. Next time Crash does it, take a picture >and post it on abf! ![]() Okey-dokey. Carol |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
sf > wrote:
> >I'm having trouble visualizing 4 cornish hens on one vertical roaster. Me too... and I'm jealous! ---= BOYCOTT FRANCE (belgium) GERMANY--SPAIN =--- ---= Move UNITED NATIONS To Paris =--- ********* "Life would be devoid of all meaning were it without tribulation." Sheldon ```````````` |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
sf > wrote:
> >I'm having trouble visualizing 4 cornish hens on one vertical roaster. Me too... and I'm jealous! ---= BOYCOTT FRANCE (belgium) GERMANY--SPAIN =--- ---= Move UNITED NATIONS To Paris =--- ********* "Life would be devoid of all meaning were it without tribulation." Sheldon ```````````` |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mark Thorson > wrote in message >...
> According to this document: > > http://www.epa.gov/ttn/atw/coat/mcan/pic-can.pdf > > earlier solvent-based can coatings are being > replaced with UV-cure coatings to comply with > environmental legislation against solvent emissions. > The older coatings were baked in ovens at > temperatures of about 350-400F, which is at > or above the temperature you'd normally bake > a chicken at. But the UV-cure coatings never > see the inside of an oven. > Oh god. We're going to start seeing postings announcing old beer cans for sale on E-Bay. -bwg |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 25 Jul 2004 23:48:41 GMT, I needed a babel fish to understand
(Curly Sue) : >Hopefully some entrepreneur will come up with a safe "beer can" so >people who enjoy this dish can continue to do so. >Sue(tm) >Lead me not into temptation... I can find it myself! you can use other cans besides beer cans.... your basic tomato soup can, open pour out soup, Clean inside and out (remove label etc), and pour a beer or some other liquid you prefer inside. |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 25 Jul 2004 23:48:41 GMT, I needed a babel fish to understand
(Curly Sue) : >Hopefully some entrepreneur will come up with a safe "beer can" so >people who enjoy this dish can continue to do so. >Sue(tm) >Lead me not into temptation... I can find it myself! you can use other cans besides beer cans.... your basic tomato soup can, open pour out soup, Clean inside and out (remove label etc), and pour a beer or some other liquid you prefer inside. |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A shot rang out! And Alan Moorman said:
> On Mon, 26 Jul 2004 08:30:44 -0700, Randy > > wrote: > > >I agree, it is a gimmick that everybody tries once. -RP > > Uh. A FEW people try once. Agreed -- I still haven't tried it and probably won't. It just doesn't sound appealing to me. Waste of a good beer and all that... -- J.J. in WA ~ mom, vid gamer, novice cook ~ "I rule you!" - Travis of the Cosmos, ATHF (COLD to HOT for e-mail) |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A shot rang out! And Alan Moorman said:
> On Mon, 26 Jul 2004 08:30:44 -0700, Randy > > wrote: > > >I agree, it is a gimmick that everybody tries once. -RP > > Uh. A FEW people try once. Agreed -- I still haven't tried it and probably won't. It just doesn't sound appealing to me. Waste of a good beer and all that... -- J.J. in WA ~ mom, vid gamer, novice cook ~ "I rule you!" - Travis of the Cosmos, ATHF (COLD to HOT for e-mail) |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
REC: BBQ Beer Can Chicken | General Cooking | |||
FA: 1-Day-Left: 6 Books: BEER, BEER, BEER, BEER, BEER, BEER! (Beer Tasting, Logs, Drinking Games, etc.) | Marketplace | |||
Beer Can Chicken 2 | Recipes | |||
Beer Can Chicken | Recipes | |||
Vertical Chicken Roaster: Beer Can Chicken | Recipes |