"Ken Davey" > wrote in
:

> http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmp...=1&u=/nm/20031
> 223/bs_nm /food_disease_madcow_dc

I guess Canada now has a reason to reciprocate the last few months in
(no-)beef trade :-)

Oh, and Japan says, don't call us, we'll call you.

--
"The problem with the French is they have no
word for entrepreneur."

attributed to George W. Bush by Tony Blair
via Baroness Williams

On 23 Dec 2003 23:42:35 GMT, Michel Boucher >
wrote:

>Oh, and Japan says, don't call us, we'll call you.

I thought we already rebuilt them once Why call again?

Gar

Gar <> wrote in :

> On 23 Dec 2003 23:42:35 GMT, Michel Boucher >
> wrote:
>
>>Oh, and Japan says, don't call us, we'll call you.
>
> I thought we already rebuilt them once Why call again?

Sheesh...just wait, you'll find out.

--
"I'm the master of low expectations."

GWB, aboard Air Force One, 04Jun2003

Gar wrote:
> On 23 Dec 2003 23:42:35 GMT, Michel Boucher >
> wrote:
>
>
>>Oh, and Japan says, don't call us, we'll call you.
>
>
> I thought we already rebuilt them once Why call again?
>
> Gar

Gar,

Haven't you noticed that there are two types of people that have
disagreements with the USA: 1) Those that simply have a difference of
opinion, and that's that. 2) Those that have a pathological hatred for
this country so extreme, that they go out of their lame ways to lamely
spill their demonic vile while foaming at their mouths. They are indeed
dignified of being pitied upon. What pathetic creatures.

Happy Holidays,

Richard

--
---------------------------------------------------------------------

Dum spiro, spero. (Cicero) As long as I breathe, I hope.

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmp...20031223/bs_nm
/food_disease_madcow_dc

Enjoy.
Ken.

"Michel Boucher" > wrote in message
...
>
> I guess Canada now has a reason to reciprocate the last few months in
> (no-)beef trade :-)
>

So far, it's being reported that Canada is taking the high road--"Now is not
the time for tit-for-tat" or something like that. Personally, I think
Canada should ban US beef imports. Why the hell not?

rona

--
***For e-mail, replace .com with .ca Sorry for the inconvenience!***

On 12/23/2003 5:22 PM, in article , "Richard
Periut" > opined:

> Gar wrote:
>> On 23 Dec 2003 23:42:35 GMT, Michel Boucher >
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Oh, and Japan says, don't call us, we'll call you.
>>
>>
>> I thought we already rebuilt them once Why call again?
>>
>> Gar
>
> Gar,
>
> Haven't you noticed that there are two types of people that have
> disagreements with the USA: 1) Those that simply have a difference of
> opinion, and that's that. 2) Those that have a pathological hatred for
> this country so extreme, that they go out of their lame ways to lamely
> spill their demonic vile while foaming at their mouths. They are indeed
> dignified of being pitied upon. What pathetic creatures.
>
> Happy Holidays,
>
> Richard

Well said Richard,

Michel and Dave Smith are two pathetic canadians who do their fellow
countrymen a disservice.

They never will utter a kind word about America even though their socialist
country is subsidized by Uncle Sam.

Happy Holidays,
The Wolf

--
"It is not the critic who counts: not the man who points out how the strong
man stumbles or where the doer of deeds could have done better. The credit
belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by
dust and sweat and blood, who strives valiantly, who errs and comes up short
again and again, because there is no effort without error or shortcoming,
but who knows the great enthusiasms, the great devotions, who spends
himself for a worthy cause; who, at the best, knows, in the end, the triumph
of high achievement, and who, at the worst, if he fails, at least he fails
while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and
timid souls who knew neither victory nor defeat," Theodore Roosevelt.

"Citizenship in a Republic," Speech at the Sorbonne, Paris, April 23, 1910

"Rona Yuthasastrakosol" > wrote in
:

>
> "Michel Boucher" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>> I guess Canada now has a reason to reciprocate the last few
>> months in (no-)beef trade :-)
>>
>
> So far, it's being reported that Canada is taking the high
> road--"Now is not the time for tit-for-tat" or something like
> that. Personally, I think Canada should ban US beef imports. Why
> the hell not?

Canadian consumer annoyance with US uppityism might force the issue.
Or, we might make a trade...we'll take their beef if they leave our
softwood lumber alone :-)

--
"I'm the master of low expectations."

GWB, aboard Air Force One, 04Jun2003

On 12/23/2003 8:56 PM, in article
, "Ken Davey"
> opined:

> Michel Boucher wrote:
>> "Rona Yuthasastrakosol" > wrote in
>> :
>>
>>>
>>> "Michel Boucher" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>>
>>>> I guess Canada now has a reason to reciprocate the last few
>>>> months in (no-)beef trade :-)
>>>>
>>>
>>> So far, it's being reported that Canada is taking the high
>>> road--"Now is not the time for tit-for-tat" or something like
>>> that. Personally, I think Canada should ban US beef imports. Why
>>> the hell not?
>>
>> Canadian consumer annoyance with US uppityism might force the issue.
>> Or, we might make a trade...we'll take their beef if they leave our
>> softwood lumber alone :-)
>>
> Ya mean we might actually have a bargaining chip?
> Haha, yuk yuk. Not bloody likely. Watch how this gets minimized and called
> 'not of any importance' in the overall scheme of things'.
> Does 'level playing field' ring a bell?
> Ken (a Canadian watching my friends lose their jobs and their homes to
> American 'special interest' protectionism)
>
>
>
Better than Americans losing their jobs and homes to support canadian
socialism and welfare.
--
================================================== ===================
"New Orleans food is as delicious as the less criminal forms of sin."
-- Mark Twain, 1884
================================================== ===================

"Ken Dave" writes:
>
My wife died...


=




=




=




=



..... from lack of nooky!

Ahahahahahahahahahahahahaha. . . .





---= BOYCOTT FRENCH--GERMAN (belgium) =---
---= Move UNITED NATIONS To Paris =---
Sheldon
````````````
"Life would be devoid of all meaning were it without tribulation."

"Ken Davey" writes:
>
>I am Not an ugli faggot

You are too an ugli faggot!


---= BOYCOTT FRENCH--GERMAN (belgium) =---
---= Move UNITED NATIONS To Paris =---
Sheldon
````````````
"Life would be devoid of all meaning were it without tribulation."

In article >, The Wolf > wrote:
>Better than Americans losing their jobs and homes to support canadian
>socialism and welfare.

The heads of Canada’s five major banks have thrown down the gauntlet: They say
Canada’s per capita gross domestic product can outpace that of the U.S. by the
year 2015. In other words, it would have to outpace U.S growth by an average
of 1.6 percent a year. And, the banks don't intend to overtake the U.S. with
trickle down economics: their proposal involves taxing the wealthy and
increasing social services for all.
Reporter: Ed Ungar

hear the story at http://www.marketplace.org/shows/2003/12/23_mpp.html

The home ownership rate between Canada and the US are within a few percentage
points difference.


--

Charles
The significant problems we face cannot be solved
at the same level of thinking we were at when we
created them. Albert Einstein

On 12/23/2003 8:07 PM, in article
. net,
(Charles Quinn)" <> opined:

> In article >, The Wolf
> > wrote:
>> Better than Americans losing their jobs and homes to support canadian
>> socialism and welfare.
>
> The heads of Canada¹s five major banks have thrown down the gauntlet: They say
> Canada¹s per capita gross domestic product can outpace that of the U.S. by the
> year 2015. In other words, it would have to outpace U.S growth by an average
> of 1.6 percent a year. And, the banks don't intend to overtake the U.S. with
> trickle down economics: their proposal involves taxing the wealthy and
> increasing social services for all.
> Reporter: Ed Ungar

And Clinton never inhaled..............
>
> hear the story at http://www.marketplace.org/shows/2003/12/23_mpp.html
>
> The home ownership rate between Canada and the US are within a few percentage
> points difference.
>

--
================================================== ===================
"New Orleans food is as delicious as the less criminal forms of sin."
-- Mark Twain, 1884
================================================== ===================

On 12/23/2003 10:22 PM, in article
, "Ken Davey"
> opined:

> Charles Quinn wrote:
>> In article >, The Wolf
>> > wrote:
>>> Better than Americans losing their jobs and homes to support canadian
>>> socialism and welfare.
>>
> How about Americans losing their jobs to support communist China? eh?
> Get your head out of the sand lad. Figure out who your friends are and stop
> shitting on them!
> Ken.
>
>
canada is not a friend to America, outgoing pm Chretian (sp) couldn't utter
a kind word towards the U.S. If his life depended on it.
--
================================================== =========
"Grand pappy told my pappy back in my time son, a man had
To answer For the wicked that he'd done."
================================================== =========

Michel Boucher wrote:
> "Rona Yuthasastrakosol" > wrote in
> :
>
>>
>> "Michel Boucher" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>>
>>> I guess Canada now has a reason to reciprocate the last few
>>> months in (no-)beef trade :-)
>>>
>>
>> So far, it's being reported that Canada is taking the high
>> road--"Now is not the time for tit-for-tat" or something like
>> that. Personally, I think Canada should ban US beef imports. Why
>> the hell not?
>
> Canadian consumer annoyance with US uppityism might force the issue.
> Or, we might make a trade...we'll take their beef if they leave our
> softwood lumber alone :-)
>
Ya mean we might actually have a bargaining chip?
Haha, yuk yuk. Not bloody likely. Watch how this gets minimized and called
'not of any importance' in the overall scheme of things'.
Does 'level playing field' ring a bell?
Ken (a Canadian watching my friends lose their jobs and their homes to
American 'special interest' protectionism)

Michel Boucher wrote:
>
> "Ken Davey" > wrote in
> :
>
> > http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmp...=1&u=/nm/20031
> > 223/bs_nm /food_disease_madcow_dc
>
> I guess Canada now has a reason to reciprocate the last few months in
> (no-)beef trade :-)
>
> Oh, and Japan says, don't call us, we'll call you.
>

And beef prices will drop in the US.

Somewhere in that article it should say that it does not transmit via muscle
meat. So, don't eat beef brains...

Bert

Rona Yuthasastrakosol wrote:

> "Michel Boucher" > wrote in message
> ...
>
>>I guess Canada now has a reason to reciprocate the last few months in
>>(no-)beef trade :-)
>>
>
>
> So far, it's being reported that Canada is taking the high road--"Now is not
> the time for tit-for-tat" or something like that. Personally, I think
> Canada should ban US beef imports. Why the hell not?
>
> rona
>
Your new P.M. thinks that by kissing the moron's butt, things will work
out for Canada. Not with Bush. You are either with him or against him.
He holds grudges longer than his pappy held office.
--
Alan

"If you reject the food, ignore the customs, fear the religion, and
avoid the people, you might better stay home."
--James Michener

Ken Davey wrote:

> Michel Boucher wrote:
>
>>"Rona Yuthasastrakosol" > wrote in
:
>>
>>
>>>"Michel Boucher" > wrote in message
...
>>>
>>>>I guess Canada now has a reason to reciprocate the last few
>>>>months in (no-)beef trade :-)
>>>>
>>>
>>>So far, it's being reported that Canada is taking the high
>>>road--"Now is not the time for tit-for-tat" or something like
>>>that. Personally, I think Canada should ban US beef imports. Why
>>>the hell not?
>>
>>Canadian consumer annoyance with US uppityism might force the issue.
>>Or, we might make a trade...we'll take their beef if they leave our
>>softwood lumber alone :-)
>>
>
> Ya mean we might actually have a bargaining chip?
> Haha, yuk yuk. Not bloody likely. Watch how this gets minimized and called
> 'not of any importance' in the overall scheme of things'.
> Does 'level playing field' ring a bell?
> Ken (a Canadian watching my friends lose their jobs and their homes to
> American 'special interest' protectionism)
>
>
>
In Wa. State, as many people working in mills are out of work as in
Canada. When U.S. imports logs, it costs a lot more than buying finished
products. Sort of like when the moron put a tariff on steel. Biggest
losers were Americans making products out of the more expensive steel.
--
Alan

"If you reject the food, ignore the customs, fear the religion, and
avoid the people, you might better stay home."
--James Michener

"The Wolf" > wrote in message
...
> On 12/23/2003 10:22 PM, in article
> , "Ken Davey"
> > opined:
>
> > Charles Quinn wrote:
> >> In article >, The Wolf
> >> > wrote:
> >>> Better than Americans losing their jobs and homes to support canadian
> >>> socialism and welfare.
> >>
> > How about Americans losing their jobs to support communist China? eh?
> > Get your head out of the sand lad. Figure out who your friends are and
stop
> > shitting on them!
> > Ken.
> >
Watch out Canada the UK is still paying the USA for the help they received
at the very end of world war 2
> --

>

Charles Quinn wrote:
> In article >, The Wolf
> > wrote:
>> Better than Americans losing their jobs and homes to support canadian
>> socialism and welfare.
>
How about Americans losing their jobs to support communist China? eh?
Get your head out of the sand lad. Figure out who your friends are and stop
shitting on them!
Ken.

alzelt wrote:
> Ken Davey wrote:
>
>> Michel Boucher wrote:
>>
>>> "Rona Yuthasastrakosol" > wrote in
>>> :
>>>
>>>
>>>> "Michel Boucher" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>
>>>>> I guess Canada now has a reason to reciprocate the last few
>>>>> months in (no-)beef trade :-)
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> So far, it's being reported that Canada is taking the high
>>>> road--"Now is not the time for tit-for-tat" or something like
>>>> that. Personally, I think Canada should ban US beef imports. Why
>>>> the hell not?
>>>
>>> Canadian consumer annoyance with US uppityism might force the issue.
>>> Or, we might make a trade...we'll take their beef if they leave our
>>> softwood lumber alone :-)
>>>
>>
>> Ya mean we might actually have a bargaining chip?
>> Haha, yuk yuk. Not bloody likely. Watch how this gets minimized and
>> called 'not of any importance' in the overall scheme of things'.
>> Does 'level playing field' ring a bell?
>> Ken (a Canadian watching my friends lose their jobs and their homes
>> to American 'special interest' protectionism)
>>
>>
>>
> In Wa. State, as many people working in mills are out of work as in
> Canada. When U.S. imports logs, it costs a lot more than buying
> finished products.
Funny thing - we (in Canada - specifically the west coast) detest the export
of raw logs for the same reason as you decry their import. Corporate
interests dictate what happens - not the needs of ordinary people. Time for
a revolt methinks.
Ken.

On 12/23/2003 8:59 PM, in article ,
" > opined:

> Michel Boucher wrote:
>>
>> "Ken Davey" > wrote in
>> :
>>
>>> http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmp...=1&u=/nm/20031
>>> 223/bs_nm /food_disease_madcow_dc
>>
>> I guess Canada now has a reason to reciprocate the last few months in
>> (no-)beef trade :-)
>>
>> Oh, and Japan says, don't call us, we'll call you.
>>
>
> And beef prices will drop in the US.
>
> Somewhere in that article it should say that it does not transmit via muscle
> meat. So, don't eat beef brains...
>
> Bert

What's the big deal then? I don't know a lot of folks who eat cow brains.
--
================================================== ======================
Jules of "Pulp Fiction" fame:


There's a passage I got memorized, seems appropriate for this situation:
Ezekiel 25:17. "The path of the righteous man is beset on all sides by the
inequities of the selfish and tyranny of evil men. Blessed is he who, in the
name of charity and good will, shepherds the weak through the valley of
darkness, for he is truly his brother's keeper and finder of lost children.
And I will strike down upon thee with great vengeance and furious anger
those who attempt to poison and destroy my brothers. AND YOU WILL KNOW MY
NAME IS THE LORD WHEN I LAY BY VENGEANCE UP0N YOU!"
================================================== =======================

On 12/23/2003 9:18 PM, in article
, "alzelt"
> opined:

>
>
> Rona Yuthasastrakosol wrote:
>
>> "Michel Boucher" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>
>>> I guess Canada now has a reason to reciprocate the last few months in
>>> (no-)beef trade :-)
>>>
>>
>>
>> So far, it's being reported that Canada is taking the high road--"Now is not
>> the time for tit-for-tat" or something like that. Personally, I think
>> Canada should ban US beef imports. Why the hell not?
>>
>> rona
>>
> Your new P.M. thinks that by kissing the moron's butt, things will work
> out for Canada. Not with Bush. You are either with him or against him.
> He holds grudges longer than his pappy held office.

And Hilliary is all warm and fuzzie? You are too stupid to own a computer.

Merry Christmas,
The Wolf
--
================================================== =======================
In the world of advertising there¹s no such thing as a lie, there¹s only
the expedient exaggeration.
================================================== =======================

On 12/23/2003 9:27 PM, in article
, "Diane Epps"
> opined:

>
> "The Wolf" > wrote in message
> ...
>> On 12/23/2003 10:22 PM, in article
>> , "Ken Davey"
>> > opined:
>>
>>> Charles Quinn wrote:
>>>> In article >, The Wolf
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>> Better than Americans losing their jobs and homes to support canadian
>>>>> socialism and welfare.
>>>>
>>> How about Americans losing their jobs to support communist China? eh?
>>> Get your head out of the sand lad. Figure out who your friends are and
> stop
>>> shitting on them!
>>> Ken.
>>>
> Watch out Canada the UK is still paying the USA for the help they received
> at the very end of world war 2

No you're not! You're not EVEN paying the interest on your Marshall Plan
loans.

But we do like Maggie and Tony.
>> --
>
>>
>
>

--
================================================== =========
"Grand pappy told my pappy back in my time son, a man had
To answer For the wicked that he'd done."
================================================== =========

On 12/23/2003 11:29 PM, in article
, "Ken Davey"
> opined:

> alzelt wrote:
>> Ken Davey wrote:
>>
>>> Michel Boucher wrote:
>>>
>>>> "Rona Yuthasastrakosol" > wrote in
>>>> :
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> "Michel Boucher" > wrote in message
>>>>> ...
>>>>>
>>>>>> I guess Canada now has a reason to reciprocate the last few
>>>>>> months in (no-)beef trade :-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> So far, it's being reported that Canada is taking the high
>>>>> road--"Now is not the time for tit-for-tat" or something like
>>>>> that. Personally, I think Canada should ban US beef imports. Why
>>>>> the hell not?
>>>>
>>>> Canadian consumer annoyance with US uppityism might force the issue.
>>>> Or, we might make a trade...we'll take their beef if they leave our
>>>> softwood lumber alone :-)
>>>>
>>>
>>> Ya mean we might actually have a bargaining chip?
>>> Haha, yuk yuk. Not bloody likely. Watch how this gets minimized and
>>> called 'not of any importance' in the overall scheme of things'.
>>> Does 'level playing field' ring a bell?
>>> Ken (a Canadian watching my friends lose their jobs and their homes
>>> to American 'special interest' protectionism)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> In Wa. State, as many people working in mills are out of work as in
>> Canada. When U.S. imports logs, it costs a lot more than buying
>> finished products.
> Funny thing - we (in Canada - specifically the west coast) detest the export
> of raw logs for the same reason as you decry their import. Corporate
> interests dictate what happens - not the needs of ordinary people. Time for
> a revolt methinks.
> Ken.
>
>
>
You capitalist pigs! Where did you learn that from?
--
================================================== =======================
In the world of advertising there¹s no such thing as a lie, there¹s only
the expedient exaggeration.
================================================== =======================

"Kenneth Fagboy Davey" writes:
>
>Funny thing - we (in Canada - specifically the west coast) are all faggot
cocksuckers.

Ahahahahahahaha. . . .




---= BOYCOTT FRENCH--GERMAN (belgium) =---
---= Move UNITED NATIONS To Paris =---
Sheldon
````````````
"Life would be devoid of all meaning were it without tribulation."

The Wolf > writes:

>> Funny thing - we (in Canada - specifically the west coast) detest the
>export
>> of raw logs for the same reason as you decry their import. Corporate
>> interests dictate what happens - not the needs of ordinary people. Time for
>> a revolt methinks.
>> Ken Cocksucer Davey
>>
>>
>>
>You capitalist pigs! Where did you learn that from?

From his whoring momma PIG of course!

Ahahahahahahahahahahaha. . . .


---= BOYCOTT FRENCH--GERMAN (belgium) =---
---= Move UNITED NATIONS To Paris =---
Sheldon
````````````
"Life would be devoid of all meaning were it without tribulation."

alzelt > wrote in
:

>
>
> Rona Yuthasastrakosol wrote:
>
>> "Michel Boucher" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>
>>>I guess Canada now has a reason to reciprocate the last few
>>>months in (no-)beef trade :-)
>>>
>>
>>
>> So far, it's being reported that Canada is taking the high
>> road--"Now is not the time for tit-for-tat" or something like
>> that. Personally, I think Canada should ban US beef imports.
>> Why the hell not?
>>
>> rona
>>
> Your new P.M. thinks that by kissing the moron's butt, things will
> work out for Canada. Not with Bush. You are either with him or
> against him. He holds grudges longer than his pappy held office.

Actually, Paul can teach George a few new tricks, like not speaking
with your mouth full :-)

He has said certain things are unacceptable and already informed the
Whitehouse that there are limits that cannot be crossed. He has
campaigned (within the party mind you, not in the country as a whole)
on a realignment of Canada-US relations based on the fact that they
were supposedly damaged by Canada asking for proof of WMDs before
committing troops to war. It was only bafflegab. Now, if he
Mulroney...that would be scary at this point.

Myself, I'll not vote for him (I have never voted for either of the
three right wing parties in Canada), as I will have an opportunity to
vote for Ed Broadbent in te next election :-).

--
"I'm the master of low expectations."

GWB, aboard Air Force One, 04Jun2003

(PENMART01) wrote in
:

> The Wolf > writes:
>
>>You capitalist pigs! Where did you learn that from?
>
> From his whoring momma PIG of course!
>
> Ahahahahahahahahahahaha. . . .

You know something is really off when I'm getting posts from The
through Sheldon.

> = BOYCOTT US BEEF (and that includes Schwartzenegger) =
> = Move UN General Assembly out of harms way back to Geneva =

--
"I'm the master of low expectations."

GWB, aboard Air Force One, 04Jun2003

On 12/24/2003 11:22 AM, in article
, "Michel Boucher"
> opined:

> alzelt > wrote in
> :
>
>>
>>
>> Rona Yuthasastrakosol wrote:
>>
>>> "Michel Boucher" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>
>>>> I guess Canada now has a reason to reciprocate the last few
>>>> months in (no-)beef trade :-)
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> So far, it's being reported that Canada is taking the high
>>> road--"Now is not the time for tit-for-tat" or something like
>>> that. Personally, I think Canada should ban US beef imports.
>>> Why the hell not?
>>>
>>> rona
>>>
>> Your new P.M. thinks that by kissing the moron's butt, things will
>> work out for Canada. Not with Bush. You are either with him or
>> against him. He holds grudges longer than his pappy held office.
>
> Actually, Paul can teach George a few new tricks, like not speaking
> with your mouth full :-)
>
> He has said certain things are unacceptable and already informed the
> Whitehouse that there are limits that cannot be crossed.



What will "paul" do if George tells him to **** off?


He has
> campaigned (within the party mind you, not in the country as a whole)
> on a realignment of Canada-US relations based on the fact that they
> were supposedly damaged by Canada asking for proof of WMDs before
> committing troops to war. It was only bafflegab. Now, if he
> Mulroney...that would be scary at this point.
>
> Myself, I'll not vote for him (I have never voted for either of the
> three right wing parties in Canada), as I will have an opportunity to
> vote for Ed Broadbent in te next election :-).

--
================================================== =====================
The principal difference between genius and stupidity is that there are
limits to genius!
================================================== =====================

It is not about banning beef from this country or that. It is about
each citizen caring enough about themselves and their children to insist
that the beef they buy and that the feed that was used to feed that beef
was safe. North America permits the splitting of the spine. Britian
does not. North America permits approximately up to 30 percent of beef
blood to be feed to chickens, pigs and even to beef - all of the beef
blood is permitted in their feed. Great Britian does not permit this
practice. The Canadian or American hotlines don't mention that and
neither do the respective ministers of agriculture. I love beef but I
can't eat it until it is safe to eat in North America, if ever.

Ken Davey wrote:
>
> Michel Boucher wrote:
> > "Rona Yuthasastrakosol" > wrote in
> > :
> >
> >>
> >> "Michel Boucher" > wrote in message
> >> ...
> >>>
> >>> I guess Canada now has a reason to reciprocate the last few
> >>> months in (no-)beef trade :-)
> >>>
> >>
> >> So far, it's being reported that Canada is taking the high
> >> road--"Now is not the time for tit-for-tat" or something like
> >> that. Personally, I think Canada should ban US beef imports. Why
> >> the hell not?
> >
> > Canadian consumer annoyance with US uppityism might force the issue.
> > Or, we might make a trade...we'll take their beef if they leave our
> > softwood lumber alone :-)
> >
> Ya mean we might actually have a bargaining chip?
> Haha, yuk yuk. Not bloody likely. Watch how this gets minimized and called
> 'not of any importance' in the overall scheme of things'.
> Does 'level playing field' ring a bell?
> Ken (a Canadian watching my friends lose their jobs and their homes to
> American 'special interest' protectionism)

occupant > wrote in
:

> It is not about banning beef from this country or that. It is
> about each citizen caring enough about themselves and their
> children to insist that the beef they buy and that the feed that
> was used to feed that beef was safe. North America permits the
> splitting of the spine. Britian does not. North America permits
> approximately up to 30 percent of beef blood to be feed to
> chickens, pigs and even to beef - all of the beef blood is
> permitted in their feed. Great Britian does not permit this
> practice. The Canadian or American hotlines don't mention that
> and neither do the respective ministers of agriculture.

Actually, it has been mentioned in Canada, in the Standing Committee on
Agriculture. Guess you weren't paying attention :-)

--

"I'm the master of low expectations."

GWB, aboard Air Force One, 04Jun2003

The Wolf > wrote:
>On 12/23/2003 8:59 PM, in article ,
" > opined:
>> Somewhere in that article it should say that it does not transmit via muscle
>> meat. So, don't eat beef brains...
>
>What's the big deal then? I don't know a lot of folks who eat cow brains.

Heh. You and "brains". Irony.

BSE is transmitted by nerve tissue.

Show me a muscle that doesn't have nerve tissue in it, and
I'll show you a vegetable.

--Blair
"Anim-al."

On 12/25/2003 8:09 PM, in article ,
"Blair P. Houghton" > opined:

> The Wolf > wrote:
>> On 12/23/2003 8:59 PM, in article ,
>> " > opined:
>>> Somewhere in that article it should say that it does not transmit via muscle
>>> meat. So, don't eat beef brains...
>>
>> What's the big deal then? I don't know a lot of folks who eat cow brains.
>
> Heh. You and "brains". Irony.
>
> BSE is transmitted by nerve tissue.
>
> Show me a muscle that doesn't have nerve tissue in it, and
> I'll show you a vegetable.
>
> --Blair
> "Anim-al."

Since you and your brethren libs are brain dead, there's no mad cow risk
from you.............
--
================================================== ======
I'd rather have a German division ahead of me then a
French division behind me," Gen. George S. Patton
================================================== ======

The Wolf > wrote:
>On 12/25/2003 8:09 PM, in article ,
>"Blair P. Houghton" > opined:
>
>> The Wolf > wrote:
>>> On 12/23/2003 8:59 PM, in article ,
>>> " > opined:
>>>> Somewhere in that article it should say that it does not transmit via muscle
>>>> meat. So, don't eat beef brains...
>>>
>>> What's the big deal then? I don't know a lot of folks who eat cow brains.
>>
>> Heh. You and "brains". Irony.
>>
>> BSE is transmitted by nerve tissue.
>>
>> Show me a muscle that doesn't have nerve tissue in it, and
>> I'll show you a vegetable.
>>
>> "Anim-al."
>
>Since you and your brethren libs are brain dead, there's no mad cow risk
>from you.............

Y'know what? You're just plain stupid and proud of it.

You're joining Sheldon in my killfile.

--Blair
"Go suck his piazza."

On 12/26/2003 5:58 PM, in article ,
"Blair P. Houghton" > opined:

> The Wolf > wrote:
>> On 12/25/2003 8:09 PM, in article ,
>> "Blair P. Houghton" > opined:
>>
>>> The Wolf > wrote:
>>>> On 12/23/2003 8:59 PM, in article ,
>>>> " > opined:
>>>>> Somewhere in that article it should say that it does not transmit via
>>>>> muscle
>>>>> meat. So, don't eat beef brains...
>>>>
>>>> What's the big deal then? I don't know a lot of folks who eat cow brains.
>>>
>>> Heh. You and "brains". Irony.
>>>
>>> BSE is transmitted by nerve tissue.
>>>
>>> Show me a muscle that doesn't have nerve tissue in it, and
>>> I'll show you a vegetable.
>>>
>>> "Anim-al."
>>
>> Since you and your brethren libs are brain dead, there's no mad cow risk
>> from you.............
>
> Y'know what? You're just plain stupid and proud of it.
>
> You're joining Sheldon in my killfile.

You are too ****ing stupid to program a killfile.
>
> --Blair
> "Go suck his piazza."

--
================================================== ========================
"When a broad table is to be made, and the edges of planks do not fit, the
artist takes a little from both, and makes a good joint. In like manner
here, both sides must part with some of their demands," Benjamin Franklin
(1706-1790)
================================================== ========================

On Tue, 23 Dec 2003 23:29:57 -0800, "Ken Davey" >
wrote:

>Funny thing - we (in Canada - specifically the west coast) detest the export
>of raw logs for the same reason as you decry their import. Corporate
>interests dictate what happens - not the needs of ordinary people. Time for
>a revolt methinks.
>Ken.
>
i thought canadians were too polite to revolt.

your pal,
blake

On Wed, 24 Dec 2003 05:18:02 GMT, alzelt
> wrote:

>
>
>Rona Yuthasastrakosol wrote:
>
>> "Michel Boucher" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>
>>>I guess Canada now has a reason to reciprocate the last few months in
>>>(no-)beef trade :-)
>>>
>>
>>
>> So far, it's being reported that Canada is taking the high road--"Now is not
>> the time for tit-for-tat" or something like that. Personally, I think
>> Canada should ban US beef imports. Why the hell not?
>>
>> rona
>>
>Your new P.M. thinks that by kissing the moron's butt, things will work
>out for Canada. Not with Bush. You are either with him or against him.
>He holds grudges longer than his pappy held office.

hopefully, he won't hold office longer than poppy held office.

your pal,
blake

Michel Boucher > wrote:


>
> You know something is really off when I'm getting posts from The
> through Sheldon.
>
They share the same mindset and level of intelligence; they merely have
differing preoccupations.

(Tim Vanhoof) wrote in
:

> Michel Boucher > wrote:
>
>> You know something is really off when I'm getting posts from The
>> through Sheldon.
>>
> They share the same mindset and level of intelligence; they merely
> have differing preoccupations.

That's the simplistic explanation and anyway it's not true. Sheldon
has only become a Rumsfeld bootlicker as a result of recent events.
The has been one his whole life.

--

"I'm the master of low expectations."

GWB, aboard Air Force One, 04Jun2003