As a loyal fan, I'm sure you'll want to read this:

http://www.marthatalks.com/

And please try not to comment on how much
weight she's gained recently.

What weight gain. She's in the back of the picture and looks the same to
me.

--
Helen

Thanks be unto God for His wonderful gift:
Jesus Christ, the only begotten Son of God
is the object of our faith; the only faith that
saves is faith in Him

<>< ><>
www.peagramfamily.com
http://www.mompeagram.homestead.com/



225/190/145





"Mark Thorson" > wrote in message
...
> As a loyal fan, I'm sure you'll want to read this:
>
> http://www.marthatalks.com/
>
> And please try not to comment on how much
> weight she's gained recently.
>
>
>

Steve Wertz wrote:

> Most men get more distinguished and handsome as they grow older
> (unless you're Clint Eastwood).
>
> Women don't.
>
> -sw

As a woman who had had more rectal exams than you can shake a stick at,
I don't think most men get more distinguished and handsome as they they
get older. There are a few that improve (I'm married to one...his face
was too gaunt in his younger days), but some women do, too. Joan
Crawford, to me, looked much better middle aged than in her twenties. I
think you are mentally skipping over, say, Alan Bates turkey neck, the
uneven balders, and the puffy blotcher. No one can tell me Van Johnson
got handsomer and more distinguished. Nor Bob Hope.

LIMEYNO1 wrote:

> What weight gain. She's in the back of the picture and looks
> the same to me.

I wasn't referring to the picture -- in which she is artfully
placed behind a row of her employees.

Watch her program -- she looks a lot different in the recent
shows. A lot of older segments are being recycled in the
new shows, so you can do a then-and-now comparison.

Mark Thorson > wrote in :

> LIMEYNO1 wrote:
>
>> What weight gain. She's in the back of the picture and looks
>> the same to me.
>
> I wasn't referring to the picture -- in which she is artfully
> placed behind a row of her employees.
>
> Watch her program -- she looks a lot different in the recent
> shows. A lot of older segments are being recycled in the
> new shows, so you can do a then-and-now comparison.

And you feel it's important for you to point this out because...?

LIMEYNO1 wrote:
>
> What weight gain. She's in the back of the picture and looks the same to
> me.

I think she looks great for her age, which I think might be 60.

nancy

>Nancy Young wrote
>
>LIMEYNO1 wrote:
>>
>> What weight gain. She's in the back of the picture and looks the same to
>> me.
>
>I think she looks great for her age, which I think might be 60.
>
>nancy

http://people.aol.com/people/profile...105244,00.html

Martha Stewart

Basic Facts

Real Name: Martha Stewart
Birthplace: Nutley, NJ
Birthdate: 8/3/41
Education: Barnard College
Relationships: Andy Stewart (divorced)
Children: Alexis (1965)
Fact: Has published more than a dozen books on entertaining. * Sleeps four
hours a night with the lights on so when she wakes up she can get right to
work.
---


---= BOYCOTT FRENCH--GERMAN (belgium) =---
---= Move UNITED NATIONS To Paris =---
Sheldon
````````````
"Life would be devoid of all meaning were it without tribulation."

Nancy Young wrote:

> I think she looks great for her age, which I think might be 60.

She's 62, birthdate 8/3/41.

Mark Thorson wrote:
> Watch her program

No. There are several reasons why I don't watch much TV, and Martha
Stuart is one of them.

--
John Gaughan
http://www.johngaughan.net/

Mark Thorson wrote:
>
> Nancy Young wrote:
>
> > I think she looks great for her age, which I think might be 60.
>
> She's 62, birthdate 8/3/41.

August 3rd, what are the odds. Long, long story, but it's amusing
to me.

At any rate, I wish all of us trollops look that good at 62. And
you guys, too.

nancy

In article >,
Steve Wertz > wrote:

> On Sun, 11 Jan 2004 22:51:36 -0500, Nancy Young
> > wrote:
>
> >At any rate, I wish all of us trollops look that good at 62. And
> >you guys, too.
>
> Most men get more distinguished and handsome as they grow older
> (unless you're Clint Eastwood).

You wish... ;-)

>
> Women don't.

Depends. Look at Cher!
Granted, she has a good plastic surgeon, but still....

>
> -sw

K.

--
>,,<Cat's Haven Hobby >,,<
http://cgi6.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dl...user id=katra

>>At any rate, I wish all of us trollops look that good at 62. And you
guys, too.

>Most men get more distinguished and handsome as they grow older
(unless you're Clint Eastwood).
*****************************
And then there's my ex...........

>>Women don't.

> Depends. Look at Cher! Granted, she has a good plastic surgeon, but
still....

And who knows how much plastic surgery these men have had? Could be they
also have been nipped and tucked...

Suzan

kalanamak > wrote in message >...
> Steve Wertz wrote:
>
> > Most men get more distinguished and handsome as they grow older
> > (unless you're Clint Eastwood).
> >
> > Women don't.
> >
> > -sw
>
> As a woman who had had more rectal exams than you can shake a stick at,
> I don't think most men get more distinguished and handsome as they they
> get older. There are a few that improve (I'm married to one...his face
> was too gaunt in his younger days), but some women do, too. Joan
> Crawford, to me, looked much better middle aged than in her twenties. I
> think you are mentally skipping over, say, Alan Bates turkey neck, the
> uneven balders, and the puffy blotcher. No one can tell me Van Johnson
> got handsomer and more distinguished. Nor Bob Hope.

At our 20 year HS reunion (two years ago), all the guys had fat beer
bellies, were bald and greying. The women, however, kicked ass...many
of them stayed at their HS weight or close, looked gorgeous and were
more successful than the guys, too.

-L.

Anyone looks "good" with the aid or hairstylists and makeup artists....


Nancy Young > wrote in message >...
> LIMEYNO1 wrote:
> >
> > What weight gain. She's in the back of the picture and looks the same to
> > me.
>
> I think she looks great for her age, which I think might be 60.
>
> nancy

Steve Wertz > writes:

>It's really sad when someone uses the AOL website as their source of
>information.

It's the same information found anywhere else on the web.

Every other service provider has plusses and minuses as well - it's not
exclusive to AOL.

What's really sad is when someone's so judgmental that they have to put down
others for no reason. If you wanted to take a jab at Sheldon, why didn't you
have the balls to do so instead of attacking the entire AOL service?

I have another ISP - Earthlink. But AOL is faster and easier and I like the
setup for newsgroups better than using my Agent newsreader with Earthlink. I
just don't care whether anyone's impressed with the name of my ISP.

Connie
************************************************** ***
My mind is like a steel...um, whatchamacallit.

Thank you for passing this on to us....I hope all goes well with her.

Just a Jeanie

Has Martha blimped? Perhaps she is carbing up in preparation of some lean
times at Club Fed.

F.J.

"The Rewirer" > wrote in message
om...
> Anyone looks "good" with the aid or hairstylists and makeup artists....
>
>
> Nancy Young > wrote in message
>...
> > LIMEYNO1 wrote:
> > >
> > > What weight gain. She's in the back of the picture and looks the same
to
> > > me.
> >
> > I think she looks great for her age, which I think might be 60.
> >
> > nancy

Steve Wertz wrote:
>
> On Sun, 11 Jan 2004 22:58:29 -0600, Katra >
> wrote:
>
> >Depends. Look at Cher!
> >Granted, she has a good plastic surgeon, but still....
>
> You know what really baffles me? Donny and Marie (among other things
> ;-)
>
> Many (not most) men get more distinguished looking... As a man
> though, I don't know any men my age that think a woman actually got
> better looking bewteen the ages of 40 and 70. If I were to grow (as)
> old with those same women though, I would probably have a different
> perspective.
>
> -sw <ducking, as usual>

The problem *is* your perspective. No offense, guys, but I bet most
of you looked much better when you were younger rather than older.
I saw a funny cartoon once, two old guys in the mall, pretty girl
walks by, one says to the other, funny how you become invisible when
you get older.

Just cause they looked at you when you were 20, don't count on being
a stud at 50. Distinguished or otherwise ... unless you have the
bucks, of course.

nancy

(ConnieG999) wrote:
>
>>What's really sad is when someone's so judgmental that they have to put down
>>others for no reason. If you wanted to take a jab at Sheldon, why didn't you
>>have the balls to do so instead of attacking the entire AOL service?
>
>AOL is the laughing stock of the Internet.
>
>>I have another ISP - Earthlink. But AOL is faster and easier and I like the
>>setup for newsgroups better than using my Agent newsreader with Earthlink.



As anyone can plainly see sqwertz is a CHEAP JEALOUS ******* who has to *STEAL*
the services of an EDU account... sqwertz is a friggin' low life THIEF, plain
and simple... he's all mouth, with empty pockets.

If you'll notice, every single time you see someone harping about AOL, they're
the ones using/stealing free/low cost internet access, EDU, hotmail, or
somesuch no account account... cheap poor JEALOUS empty pocket THIEVING
*******s!

Ahahahahahahahahahahahahaha. . . .


---= BOYCOTT FRENCH--GERMAN (belgium) =---
---= Move UNITED NATIONS To Paris =---
Sheldon
````````````
"Life would be devoid of all meaning were it without tribulation."

Steve Wertz > writes:

>AOL'ers don't have a clue how the Internet works, or how to read
>headers. Then they spout off like they actually know something, when
>in fact they couldn't be more wrong. And you call me clueless?

Well that's certainly a sweeping generalization. Guess you have to put people
down in order to feel superior instead of worrying about facts.

>I have another ISP - Earthlink. But AOL is faster and easier and I like the
>setup for newsgroups better than using my Agent newsreader with Earthlink. I
>just don't care whether anyone's impressed with the name of my ISP.

>>>So why did you mention it, then?

To point out how irrational and childish your biased opinion is.

Connie
************************************************** ***
My mind is like a steel...um, whatchamacallit.

In article >, Steve Wertz
> wrote:


> AOL'ers don't have a clue how the Internet works, or how to read
> headers. Then they spout off like they actually know something, when
> in fact they couldn't be more wrong. And you call me clueless?

It's my observation that 90% of automobile drivers don't have a clue how
their car works. I also observe that those 90% are often better (safer)
drivers. They are just interested in getting from point A to point B, not
in pushing their cars faster and harder.


> Anybody with half a brain can see I'm posting from a commercial ISP,


It doesn't take brains, it takes specialized knowledge. Plus, AOL hides
these kind of details from people, on purpose. You don't need to know
this stuff to make quality posts on newsgroups.

--
Dan Abel
Sonoma State University
AIS

Steve Wertz > wrote:

> AOL'ers don't have a clue how the Internet works, or how to read
> headers. Then they spout off like they actually know something, when
> in fact they couldn't be more wrong. And you call me clueless?

> Keep your heads burried in the sand, all you AOL'ers.

> Anybody with half a brain can see I'm posting from a commercial ISP,
> using the most complete commercial Usenet service available along with
> one of the finest, most versatile news clients on the planet. You'll
> also notice I subscribe (and pay) for the most comprehensive and
> highly configurable email services available.

> All this for less than half of what these AOL suckers are paying for a
> single, shotty service while enabling them to get dumber every waking
> minute of their lives.

Don't be so sure. I know for a fact that AOL has some subscribers who know more
about how computers and the Internet works than probably 99% of the general
population. Say what you want about AOL, but it does bring some advantages to
the table; chief among them is simplicity. Another advantage is that its a great
testing ground for testing Internet-based applications that people develop so
that the developer can verify that AOL subscribers can use the app as effectively
as non-AOL subscribers.

On Sun, 11 Jan 2004 22:35:34 -0500, Nancy Young
> wrote:

>LIMEYNO1 wrote:
>>
>> What weight gain. She's in the back of the picture and looks the same to
>> me.
>
>I think she looks great for her age, which I think might be 60.
>
>nancy

she's cute.

your pal,
blake