On Thu, 4 Mar 2010 19:30:36 -0800, "Bob Terwilliger"
> wrote:

> sf wrote:
>
> >>> I really got into the whole "natural" thing when my oldest was little.
> >>> That meant no artificially colored foods, which included yellow cheese.
> >>
> >> Annatto is completely natural.
> >>
> > Annatto isn't present in milk.
>
> Neither is rennet, but you bought cheese anyway.
>
Rennet didn't color the cheese.


--
I love cooking with wine.
Sometimes I even put it in the food.

In article >,
"Bob Terwilliger" > wrote:

> Dan wrote:
>
> > What many of us have realized is that Sheldon thinks that this group is
> > just a big joke. This is his sense of humor. Some people enjoy it,
> > others don't. Someone who he used to bombard with Emails (and he has
> > stated quite clearly that he has only Emailed a handful of people on this
> > group, and then only a couple of times) explained it once. He posts the
> > most outrageous things, and then waits to see what reaction he gets.
> > Sometimes people believe him. Sometimes they get really irate. Either
> > way he is happy. He's probably chuckling away to his cats right now about
> > how he's got you going again.
>
> The behavior you describe is simply the definition of trolling.
>
> However, Occam's Razor indicates a more obvious explanation: Clueless AOL
> newbie Sheldon "Pussy" Katz really *is* as stupid, ignorant, bigoted, and
> delusional as his posts indicate, but he wants people to believe he's just
> joking about it.

That thought has crossed my mind also. And what Sheldon thinks, and the
truth, don't correspond very well.

--
Dan Abel
Petaluma, California USA

In article >,
sf > wrote:

> On Thu, 4 Mar 2010 17:46:50 -0800, "Bob Terwilliger"
> > wrote:
>
> > sf wrote:
> >
> > > I really got into the whole "natural" thing when my oldest was little.
> > > That meant no artificially colored foods, which included yellow cheese.
> >
> > Annatto is completely natural.
> >
> Annatto isn't present in milk.

Neither are rennet, salt and the cultures that are used to make many
cheeses.

ObFood: We had Mac and Cheese for dinner. Total coincidence. The
Alton Brown recipe, with generic orange American cheddar. It was very
good. With broccoli and a salad. My daughter took her broccoli out
when it got barely warm (CRUNCH! CRUNCH! CRUNCH!), but my wife and I let
ours cook until it softened a bit.

--
Dan Abel
Petaluma, California USA

sf wrote:

>>>>> I really got into the whole "natural" thing when my oldest was little.
>>>>> That meant no artificially colored foods, which included yellow
>>>>> cheese.
>>>>
>>>> Annatto is completely natural.
>>>>
>>> Annatto isn't present in milk.
>>
>> Neither is rennet, but you bought cheese anyway.
>>
> Rennet didn't color the cheese.

So what are you objecting to? Annatto is not artificial, so you can't be
objecting to an artificial color. And since you allow rennet, then you're
not objecting to things which weren't in the milk to start off with. So if
you allow additional ingredients (which you do, obviously), and you allow
natural ingredients (which annatto is), then what's wrong with yellow
cheese?

Or is this just one of those "I was young and dumb" things?

Bob

Bob Terwilliger > wrote:

>sf wrote:

>> I really got into the whole "natural" thing when my oldest was little.
>> That meant no artificially colored foods, which included yellow cheese.

>Annatto is completely natural.

Correct. Just as fenugreek is used in "imitation" (rather than
"artificial") maple syrup. These are natural colorings and
flavorings; they're not artificial; they're merely fake.

Steve

On Thu, 4 Mar 2010 21:56:20 -0800, "Bob Terwilliger"
> wrote:

> sf wrote:
>
> >>>>> I really got into the whole "natural" thing when my oldest was little.
> >>>>> That meant no artificially colored foods, which included yellow
> >>>>> cheese.
> >>>>
> >>>> Annatto is completely natural.
> >>>>
> >>> Annatto isn't present in milk.
> >>
> >> Neither is rennet, but you bought cheese anyway.
> >>
> > Rennet didn't color the cheese.
>
> So what are you objecting to? Annatto is not artificial, so you can't be
> objecting to an artificial color. And since you allow rennet, then you're
> not objecting to things which weren't in the milk to start off with. So if
> you allow additional ingredients (which you do, obviously), and you allow
> natural ingredients (which annatto is), then what's wrong with yellow
> cheese?
>
> Or is this just one of those "I was young and dumb" things?
>

Go play your cheese semantics game with Arri.

--
I love cooking with wine.
Sometimes I even put it in the food.

sf wrote:

>>>>>>> I really got into the whole "natural" thing when my oldest was
>>>>>>> little. That meant no artificially colored foods, which included
>>>>>>> yellow cheese.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Annatto is completely natural.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Annatto isn't present in milk.
>>>>
>>>> Neither is rennet, but you bought cheese anyway.
>>>>
>>> Rennet didn't color the cheese.
>>
>> So what are you objecting to? Annatto is not artificial, so you can't be
>> objecting to an artificial color. And since you allow rennet, then you're
>> not objecting to things which weren't in the milk to start off with. So
>> if you allow additional ingredients (which you do, obviously), and you
>> allow natural ingredients (which annatto is), then what's wrong with
>> yellow cheese?
>>
>> Or is this just one of those "I was young and dumb" things?
>>
>
> Go play your cheese semantics game with Arri.


Oh... You weren't YOUNG, either, huh? Well, I *tried* to give you an out!

Bob

In article >,
"Bob Terwilliger" > wrote:

> sf wrote:
>
> >>>>>>> I really got into the whole "natural" thing when my oldest was
> >>>>>>> little. That meant no artificially colored foods, which included
> >>>>>>> yellow cheese.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Annatto is completely natural.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> Annatto isn't present in milk.
> >>>>
> >>>> Neither is rennet, but you bought cheese anyway.
> >>>>
> >>> Rennet didn't color the cheese.
> >>
> >> So what are you objecting to? Annatto is not artificial, so you can't be
> >> objecting to an artificial color. And since you allow rennet, then you're
> >> not objecting to things which weren't in the milk to start off with. So
> >> if you allow additional ingredients (which you do, obviously), and you
> >> allow natural ingredients (which annatto is), then what's wrong with
> >> yellow cheese?
> >>
> >> Or is this just one of those "I was young and dumb" things?
> >>
> >
> > Go play your cheese semantics game with Arri.
>
>
> Oh... You weren't YOUNG, either, huh? Well, I *tried* to give you an out!
>
> Bob

Bob, You sit on a thistle or something?
'cause you've been a royal pain in the ass lately!
You are beginning to pick on FAR too many posters!
What the hell is wrong with you?
--
Peace! Om

"Human nature seems to be to control other people until they put their foot down."
--Steve Rothstein

Web Albums: <http://picasaweb.google.com/OMPOmelet>

Subscribe:

Om wrote:

>>>> Or is this just one of those "I was young and dumb" things?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Go play your cheese semantics game with Arri.
>>
>>
>> Oh... You weren't YOUNG, either, huh? Well, I *tried* to give you an out!
>>
>
> Bob, You sit on a thistle or something?
> 'cause you've been a royal pain in the ass lately!
> You are beginning to pick on FAR too many posters!
> What the hell is wrong with you?


I've never been one to suffer fools gladly.

Bob

In article >,
"Bob Terwilliger" > wrote:

> Om wrote:
>
> >>>> Or is this just one of those "I was young and dumb" things?
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> Go play your cheese semantics game with Arri.
> >>
> >>
> >> Oh... You weren't YOUNG, either, huh? Well, I *tried* to give you an out!
> >>
> >
> > Bob, You sit on a thistle or something?
> > 'cause you've been a royal pain in the ass lately!
> > You are beginning to pick on FAR too many posters!
> > What the hell is wrong with you?
>
>
> I've never been one to suffer fools gladly.
>
> Bob

But it seems like to you lately that you think EVERYone is a fool!
--
Peace! Om

"Human nature seems to be to control other people until they put their foot down."
--Steve Rothstein

Web Albums: <http://picasaweb.google.com/OMPOmelet>

Subscribe:

Om wrote:

>> I've never been one to suffer fools gladly.
>
> But it seems like to you lately that you think EVERYone is a fool!

Really? Does "EVERYONE" consist of sf, Peter-puller, Pussy, and cyber****?

Bob

On Fri, 5 Mar 2010 10:13:01 -0800, "Bob Terwilliger"
> wrote:

>Om wrote:
>
>>> I've never been one to suffer fools gladly.
>>
>> But it seems like to you lately that you think EVERYone is a fool!
>
>Really? Does "EVERYONE" consist of sf, Peter-puller, Pussy, and cyber****?

How swell of you to project the tip if the iceberg acknowleging some
of those who you realize have higher intelligence and intimidate
you... what an ugly baboon ass face, ugli inside and out... so where's
ya schtinkin shmooslin ****... left ya for a gorrilla with a big
banana! LOL-LOL-LOLOLOLOL

Ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha. . . .

On Fri, 5 Mar 2010 01:45:09 -0800, Bob Terwilliger wrote:

> Om wrote:
>
>>>>> Or is this just one of those "I was young and dumb" things?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Go play your cheese semantics game with Arri.
>>>
>>>
>>> Oh... You weren't YOUNG, either, huh? Well, I *tried* to give you an out!
>>>
>>
>> Bob, You sit on a thistle or something?
>> 'cause you've been a royal pain in the ass lately!
>> You are beginning to pick on FAR too many posters!
>> What the hell is wrong with you?
>
> I've never been one to suffer fools gladly.
>
> Bob

the slogan of pompous assholes everywhere.

blake

In article >,
"Bob Terwilliger" > wrote:

> Om wrote:
>
> >> I've never been one to suffer fools gladly.
> >
> > But it seems like to you lately that you think EVERYone is a fool!
>
> Really? Does "EVERYONE" consist of sf, Peter-puller, Pussy, and cyber****?
>
> Bob

I had to say something when you added sf to your attacks.
It was uncalled for.
--
Peace! Om

"Human nature seems to be to control other people until they put their foot down."
--Steve Rothstein

Web Albums: <http://picasaweb.google.com/OMPOmelet>

Subscribe:

On Fri, 05 Mar 2010 06:33:59 -0600, Omelet wrote:

> In article >,
> "Bob Terwilliger" > wrote:
>
>> Om wrote:
>>
>>>>>> Or is this just one of those "I was young and dumb" things?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Go play your cheese semantics game with Arri.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Oh... You weren't YOUNG, either, huh? Well, I *tried* to give you an out!
>>>>
>>>
>>> Bob, You sit on a thistle or something?
>>> 'cause you've been a royal pain in the ass lately!
>>> You are beginning to pick on FAR too many posters!
>>> What the hell is wrong with you?
>>
>> I've never been one to suffer fools gladly.
>>
>> Bob
>
> But it seems like to you lately that you think EVERYone is a fool!

that's what happens when you're a triple-niner.

your pal,
blake

On Thu, 04 Mar 2010 15:32:56 -0600, Omelet wrote:

> In article
> >,
> Dan Abel > wrote:
>>
>> I'm not sure what that word means. What many of us have realized is
>> that Sheldon thinks that this group is just a big joke. This is his
>> sense of humor. Some people enjoy it, others don't. Someone who he
>> used to bombard with Emails (and he has stated quite clearly that he has
>> only Emailed a handful of people on this group, and then only a couple
>> of times) explained it once. He posts the most outrageous things, and
>> then waits to see what reaction he gets. Sometimes people believe him.
>> Sometimes they get really irate. Either way he is happy. He's probably
>> chuckling away to his cats right now about how he's got you going again.
>
> So you are saying he likes to yank chains? <g> Who'd a thunk it?
>
> Personally, I like Sheldon and find him entertaining to read. I think
> that overall, like Swertz, he's really a good person at heart but uses
> usenet as much for entertainment as anything else. And both of them
> really are good cooks...

no. a 'good person at heart' does not go out of his way to insult people
just to get a rise out of them. whether the insults are what he 'really
feels' or not is immaterial. i suspect the insults are completely sincere.

what he is at heart is a fourth-grader with social adjustment issues, and a
not-very-bright fourth-grader at that.

your pal,
blake

On Thu, 4 Mar 2010 22:32:20 -0500, pavane wrote:
>
> Yes indeed. The problem in describing Sheldumb's responses as a humor
> syndrome is that they change so much as a function of time. In the mornings
> his comments are coherent and somewhat helpful. Then just after noon he
> becomes beligerent, then abusive and ridiculously vehement. By day's end
> he is babbling incoherently about all of his lies, labeling everyone as liars
> and morons, misstating all sorts of details, and in general exhibiting classic
> bipolar lunacy. Appreciating him is like complimenting Sweeney Todd for
> being able to give the occasional good shave.
>
> pavane

<snort>

your last sentence is classic. my hat is off to you, sir.

your pal,
blake

In article >,
blake murphy > wrote:

> On Fri, 5 Mar 2010 01:45:09 -0800, Bob Terwilliger wrote:
>
> > Om wrote:
> >
> >>>>> Or is this just one of those "I was young and dumb" things?
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Go play your cheese semantics game with Arri.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Oh... You weren't YOUNG, either, huh? Well, I *tried* to give you an out!
> >>>
> >>
> >> Bob, You sit on a thistle or something?
> >> 'cause you've been a royal pain in the ass lately!
> >> You are beginning to pick on FAR too many posters!
> >> What the hell is wrong with you?
> >
> > I've never been one to suffer fools gladly.
> >
> > Bob
>
> the slogan of pompous assholes everywhere.
>
> blake

<giggles> Good one Blake. The thing is, I really do love Bob's cooking
posts so I won't kf him but I do wish he'd knock it the hell off on the
picking on people posts. But I guess if he is having fun... <sigh>
It's just tiresome to wade thru them.

And yeah, I know it's Ironic as I tend to pick on Jerry Sauk, but so
does everyone else! <g>
--
Peace! Om

"Human nature seems to be to control other people until they put their foot down."
--Steve Rothstein

Web Albums: <http://picasaweb.google.com/OMPOmelet>

Subscribe:

In article >,
blake murphy > wrote:

> On Thu, 04 Mar 2010 15:32:56 -0600, Omelet wrote:
>
> > In article
> > >,
> > Dan Abel > wrote:
> >>
> >> I'm not sure what that word means. What many of us have realized is
> >> that Sheldon thinks that this group is just a big joke. This is his
> >> sense of humor. Some people enjoy it, others don't. Someone who he
> >> used to bombard with Emails (and he has stated quite clearly that he has
> >> only Emailed a handful of people on this group, and then only a couple
> >> of times) explained it once. He posts the most outrageous things, and
> >> then waits to see what reaction he gets. Sometimes people believe him.
> >> Sometimes they get really irate. Either way he is happy. He's probably
> >> chuckling away to his cats right now about how he's got you going again.
> >
> > So you are saying he likes to yank chains? <g> Who'd a thunk it?
> >
> > Personally, I like Sheldon and find him entertaining to read. I think
> > that overall, like Swertz, he's really a good person at heart but uses
> > usenet as much for entertainment as anything else. And both of them
> > really are good cooks...
>
> no. a 'good person at heart' does not go out of his way to insult people
> just to get a rise out of them. whether the insults are what he 'really
> feels' or not is immaterial. i suspect the insults are completely sincere.
>
> what he is at heart is a fourth-grader with social adjustment issues, and a
> not-very-bright fourth-grader at that.
>
> your pal,
> blake

<shrugs> ok. It's just that I've personally met some people who behaved
like that only on usenet for the entertainment value, and were actually
really nice people in "real life". It seems to be a usenet thing. I
personally try to be myself here for the most part. ;-)
--
Peace! Om

"Human nature seems to be to control other people until they put their foot down."
--Steve Rothstein

Web Albums: <http://picasaweb.google.com/OMPOmelet>

Subscribe:

blake murphy wrote:

>On Thu, 04 Mar 2010 15:32:56 -0600, Omelet wrote:
>
>> In article
>> >,
>> Dan Abel > wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm not sure what that word means. What many of us have realized is
>>> that Sheldon thinks that this group is just a big joke. This is his
>>> sense of humor. Some people enjoy it, others don't. Someone who he
>>> used to bombard with Emails (and he has stated quite clearly that he has
>>> only Emailed a handful of people on this group, and then only a couple
>>> of times) explained it once. He posts the most outrageous things, and
>>> then waits to see what reaction he gets. Sometimes people believe him.
>>> Sometimes they get really irate. Either way he is happy. He's probably
>>> chuckling away to his cats right now about how he's got you going again.
>>
>> So you are saying he likes to yank chains? <g> Who'd a thunk it?
>>
>> Personally, I like Sheldon and find him entertaining to read. I think
>> that overall, like Swertz, he's really a good person at heart but uses
>> usenet as much for entertainment as anything else. And both of them
>> really are good cooks...
>
>no. a 'good person at heart' does not go out of his way to insult people
>just to get a rise out of them.

What irony... that makes you the most sardonic creep here... and don't
take that literally, you don't have knees! LOL The mick is also in
the bottom 10 percentile of the usenet ignoranus pool... someone whose
only purpose for being here is bashing out his bitterness on people is
dumber than shit for advertising that he has no legs... did we really
need to visualize your freak showedness on a cooking group... NOT! You
deserve every KICK in your vulvacanized pie hole you get.

Why is it on a COOKING group do we need to know who's ***, who's
shacking up, who's screwing a shmoozlin, who's a tri-polar, who has
false teeth, etc., like if yer gonna advertise the most intimate
details of your personal life in a public arena then you have no right
to expect any consideration when you bash anyone for anything when you
yourself are admitedly more a freak than those you harrass. I don't
really want to read anyones intimate personal beeswax here, save that
for private email. I don't even want to read who emails who... that
tells me who never to trust. I learned a long, LONG time ago never to
tell anything intimately personal about my life in email, yoose all
have FLD... and Flapping Lips sink ships... email is much too easy to
edit and forward. In usenet too many people you think are your
friends one day will the next day stab you in the back in a heartbeat.
Like Om and the dwarf, not for a second do I believe they don't sit
around discussing me and plotting strategy for setting me up... and
then right here in this thread one lies and the other swears to it...
comparing my cooking to the sqwartz doesn't stroke my ego one bit,
he'll never be in my class, in fact with what you gleaned from me you
are a much better cook than he will ever be.

In article >,
brooklyn1 > wrote:

> comparing my cooking to the sqwartz doesn't stroke my ego one bit,
> he'll never be in my class, in fact with what you gleaned from me you
> are a much better cook than he will ever be.

Pardon Shel' but I did not _compare_ your cooking to Steve's. I simply
said that you are both "good cooks". You both tend to cook an entirely
different class of foods.

I prefer to be versatile and learn from _everyone_ here!
--
Peace! Om

"Human nature seems to be to control other people until they put their foot down."
--Steve Rothstein

Web Albums: <http://picasaweb.google.com/OMPOmelet>

Subscribe:

On Fri, 5 Mar 2010 13:45:08 -0500, blake murphy
> wrote:

> On Fri, 5 Mar 2010 01:45:09 -0800, Bob Terwilliger wrote:
>
> > Om wrote:
> >
> >>>>> Or is this just one of those "I was young and dumb" things?
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Go play your cheese semantics game with Arri.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Oh... You weren't YOUNG, either, huh? Well, I *tried* to give you an out!
> >>>
> >>
> >> Bob, You sit on a thistle or something?
> >> 'cause you've been a royal pain in the ass lately!
> >> You are beginning to pick on FAR too many posters!
> >> What the hell is wrong with you?
> >
> > I've never been one to suffer fools gladly.
> >
> > Bob
>
> the slogan of pompous assholes everywhere.
>

He couldn't even come up with an original insult.


--
I love cooking with wine.
Sometimes I even put it in the food.

On Fri, 05 Mar 2010 13:31:22 -0600, Omelet >
wrote:

> <giggles> Good one Blake. The thing is, I really do love Bob's cooking
> posts so I won't kf him but I do wish he'd knock it the hell off on the
> picking on people posts. But I guess if he is having fun... <sigh>
> It's just tiresome to wade thru them.

Bob thinks he's being intelligent when in fact, he's boring.

--
I love cooking with wine.
Sometimes I even put it in the food.

In article >,
Omelet > wrote:

> In article >,
> brooklyn1 > wrote:
>
> > comparing my cooking to the sqwartz doesn't stroke my ego one bit,
> > he'll never be in my class, in fact with what you gleaned from me you
> > are a much better cook than he will ever be.
>
> Pardon Shel' but I did not _compare_ your cooking to Steve's. I simply
> said that you are both "good cooks". You both tend to cook an entirely
> different class of foods.
>
> I prefer to be versatile and learn from _everyone_ here!

Ps, but thanks for the compliment. :-)
--
Peace! Om

"Human nature seems to be to control other people until they put their foot down."
--Steve Rothstein

Web Albums: <http://picasaweb.google.com/OMPOmelet>

Subscribe:

In article >,
sf > wrote:

> On Fri, 05 Mar 2010 13:31:22 -0600, Omelet >
> wrote:
>
> > <giggles> Good one Blake. The thing is, I really do love Bob's cooking
> > posts so I won't kf him but I do wish he'd knock it the hell off on the
> > picking on people posts. But I guess if he is having fun... <sigh>
> > It's just tiresome to wade thru them.
>
> Bob thinks he's being intelligent when in fact, he's boring.

My point exactly.
--
Peace! Om

"Human nature seems to be to control other people until they put their foot down."
--Steve Rothstein

Web Albums: <http://picasaweb.google.com/OMPOmelet>

Subscribe:

On Fri, 05 Mar 2010 15:16:46 -0800, sf > wrote:

>On Fri, 05 Mar 2010 13:31:22 -0600, Omelet >
>wrote:
>
>> <giggles> Good one Blake. The thing is, I really do love Bob's cooking
>> posts so I won't kf him but I do wish he'd knock it the hell off on the
>> picking on people posts. But I guess if he is having fun... <sigh>
>> It's just tiresome to wade thru them.
>
>Bob thinks he's being intelligent when in fact, he's boring.

Actually he's a total moron, he's yet to post anything culinarilly
utile, all he does is post boastfully of things he has never done
(keyboard cooking) and as you say attack picayune typos demonstrating
far more ignorance than the legitimate errors of ordinary honest
folk's posts. The baboon ass face is such a newbie liar that the
shmooslin is too embarrassed to be seen associating with that filthy
douchebag... even in his rfc mug pic he looks like a common coolie
laborer that hasn't bathed in a year... no way is that swarthy, that's
stinko lubricious schmutz... no real woman would welcome those grubby
meat hooks on her body... only a brain dead shmooslin would tolerate
that abusive creep touching her parts and now she's gone, good on her.

sf wrote:
>
> On Thu, 04 Mar 2010 18:43:46 -0700, Arri London >
> wrote:
> >
> > sf wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > In that case, your life isn't as colorful as it could be! Live it up,
> > > take a chance. Homemade mac & cheese is best when using the red block
> > > of American cheddar. So there.
> >
> > Coming from someone who doesn't eat curries or like green vegetables?
>
> I don't make Indian curries, it's too involved with all that toasting
> and grinding... and curry is not anywhere near the top of my list of
> foods I enjoy.

Tsk tsk LOL!

I prefer to order curry in a restaurant and Indian
> restaurants are not my first choice. I do like Thai curry, but I
> prefer other Thai food over curry.

There's hope for you yet!

>
> Who said I don't like green vegetables? I eat beets too. 0:-)


Abject apologies then. There is someone (or more) on this group who
won't eat green vegetables. Mistakenly though it was you. Beets are
good! Spectacular colour.

Clueless AOL newbie Sheldon "Pussy" Katz wrote:

>> Does "EVERYONE" consist of sf, Peter-puller, Pussy, and cyber****?
>
> How swell of you to project the tip if the iceberg acknowleging some of
> those who you realize have higher intelligence and intimidate

I'm glad to see you acknowledging your long-standing nickname, Pussy. Most
of the time you're too addled to recognize it.

Bob

blake wrote:

>> I've never been one to suffer fools gladly.
>
> the slogan of pompous assholes everywhere.

Well, if you want to call St. Paul a pompous asshole, I guess you're
entitled to that opinion.

Bob

Om wrote:

> <giggles> Good one Blake. The thing is, I really do love Bob's cooking
> posts so I won't kf him but I do wish he'd knock it the hell off on the
> picking on people posts. But I guess if he is having fun... <sigh> It's
> just tiresome to wade thru them.

Golly, I wouldn't want you to suffer from fatigue. Have you noticed that the
number of posts you send in objection to my posts outnumber the posts to
which you're objecting?

Bob

sf wrote:

> Bob thinks he's being intelligent when in fact, he's boring.

When you write things which make no sense or which are blatantly false, it
should come as no surprise when your lapse is pointed out.

Bob

sf wrote:

> He couldn't even come up with an original insult.

I've been civil throughout this whole discussion; you're the one who veered
away from a rational dialogue. If you WANT me to bestow "original insults"
on you, I'll be happy to oblige.

Bob

Om wrote:

> I had to say something when you added sf to your attacks.
> It was uncalled for.

sf blatantly lied about the ease of obtaining white cheddar, then spouted
off utter nonsense about "artificial" and "unnatural" additives to cheese. I
challenged her on a factual basis, and asked her to explain her thought
process. She took that as an attack, and apparently so did you, but THAT was
no kind of attack at all, it was merely pointing out factual and cognitive
failures. She's the one who got personal.

You seem to have some bug up your butt telling you that I've suddenly turned
abusive, and that's coloring your perception of everything I wrote. If it
bothers you so greatly, I suggest you killfile me. Your harping will only
make things worse, I assure you.

Bob

In article >,
"Bob Terwilliger" > wrote:

> Om wrote:
>
> > <giggles> Good one Blake. The thing is, I really do love Bob's cooking
> > posts so I won't kf him but I do wish he'd knock it the hell off on the
> > picking on people posts. But I guess if he is having fun... <sigh> It's
> > just tiresome to wade thru them.
>
> Golly, I wouldn't want you to suffer from fatigue. Have you noticed that the
> number of posts you send in objection to my posts outnumber the posts to
> which you're objecting?
>
> Bob

Only because I've been bored this week as I'm waiting for calls for job
interviews. I actually have one on Monday <happy dance!> I believe
I've most often ignored them in the past.
--
Peace! Om

"Human nature seems to be to control other people until they put their foot down."
--Steve Rothstein

Web Albums: <http://picasaweb.google.com/OMPOmelet>

Subscribe:

In article >,
"Bob Terwilliger" > wrote:

> Om wrote:
>
> > I had to say something when you added sf to your attacks.
> > It was uncalled for.
>
> sf blatantly lied about the ease of obtaining white cheddar, then spouted
> off utter nonsense about "artificial" and "unnatural" additives to cheese. I
> challenged her on a factual basis, and asked her to explain her thought
> process. She took that as an attack, and apparently so did you, but THAT was
> no kind of attack at all, it was merely pointing out factual and cognitive
> failures. She's the one who got personal.
>
> You seem to have some bug up your butt telling you that I've suddenly turned
> abusive, and that's coloring your perception of everything I wrote. If it
> bothers you so greatly, I suggest you killfile me. Your harping will only
> make things worse, I assure you.
>
> Bob

But I like your food posts. You are one hell of a good and creative
cook. You'd serve the list best (if you care) by offering constructive
rather than destructive criticism dear. ;-)
--
Peace! Om

"Human nature seems to be to control other people until they put their foot down."
--Steve Rothstein

Web Albums: <http://picasaweb.google.com/OMPOmelet>

Subscribe:

On Fri, 5 Mar 2010 18:28:38 -0800, "Bob Terwilliger"
> wrote:

> Om wrote:
>
> > I had to say something when you added sf to your attacks.
> > It was uncalled for.
>
> sf blatantly lied about the ease of obtaining white cheddar, then spouted
> off utter nonsense about "artificial" and "unnatural" additives to cheese. I
> challenged her on a factual basis, and asked her to explain her thought
> process. She took that as an attack, and apparently so did you, but THAT was
> no kind of attack at all, it was merely pointing out factual and cognitive
> failures. She's the one who got personal.

You're the one who got personal, not me. You're hitting me with
semantics based on studies made after that period. The decisions I
made in the early '70s were based on knowledge of the times, which was
hyperactivity in children was due to synthetic dyes in foods like
cheese and cola. Those theories were disproven in the '80s, but YOU -
the one who has no children and who was married for the first time
just a few years ago *judges* me about decisions *I* made as a caring
adult with my first child in the early '70s? I laugh at you! You're
the idiot, not me.
>
> You seem to have some bug up your butt telling you that I've suddenly turned
> abusive, and that's coloring your perception of everything I wrote. If it
> bothers you so greatly,
>
HUH???? You think *I* care... or for and even better laugh - that
anyone else here bases their opinion about me on what you think?

> I suggest you killfile me. Your harping will only make things worse, I assure you.

Hm. I haven't alluded even once to killing you, but you do know that
when I get fed up with you that's what I do. So, I suggest that *you*
kill file me because it seems I'm the one who is setting you off.

So, it's up to you to kill me. Do it. I dare you.

Bet you can't, 'cause you're addicted to me... besides, I know you and
you're not this ugly online personality. OK, now I've said it.
You're a nice guy.

<smooches>




--
I love cooking with wine.
Sometimes I even put it in the food.

On Fri, 05 Mar 2010 18:47:46 -0700, Arri London >
wrote:

>
>
> sf wrote:
> >
> I prefer to order curry in a restaurant and Indian
> > restaurants are not my first choice. I do like Thai curry, but I
> > prefer other Thai food over curry.
>
> There's hope for you yet!
>
Whew!
> >
> > Who said I don't like green vegetables? I eat beets too. 0:-)
>
>
> Abject apologies then. There is someone (or more) on this group who
> won't eat green vegetables. Mistakenly though it was you.

I didn't mention that person *I'm* thinking you're thinking of is a
proud member of PEAS?

> Beets are good! Spectacular colour.

Especially when roasted. OMG, such good eating! My latest was
roasting golden beets, but I think you saw that post.



--
I love cooking with wine.
Sometimes I even put it in the food.

sf wrote:

>> sf blatantly lied about the ease of obtaining white cheddar, then spouted
>> off utter nonsense about "artificial" and "unnatural" additives to
>> cheese. I challenged her on a factual basis, and asked her to explain her
>> thought process. She took that as an attack, and apparently so did you,
>> but THAT was no kind of attack at all, it was merely pointing out factual
>> and cognitive failures. She's the one who got personal.
>
> You're the one who got personal, not me. You're hitting me with
> semantics based on studies made after that period. The decisions I
> made in the early '70s were based on knowledge of the times, which was
> hyperactivity in children was due to synthetic dyes in foods like
> cheese and cola. Those theories were disproven in the '80s, but YOU -
> the one who has no children and who was married for the first time
> just a few years ago *judges* me about decisions *I* made as a caring
> adult with my first child in the early '70s? I laugh at you! You're
> the idiot, not me.

Simple fact for a simpleton: ANNATTO IS NOT SYNTHETIC. You made a decision
based on ignorance in those long-bygone days, and now you're attempting to
defend that decision with more ignorance. It's all well and good to care for
your children, but you have to educate yourself so that you can make GOOD
decisions about their care. Case in point: Parents who feed their toddlers a
vegan diet are malnourishing those kids because the nutritional needs of
kids are different from the nutritional needs for adults. But the parents
THINK that they're doing what's best, and it's all for the good of the
children.


>> You seem to have some bug up your butt telling you that I've suddenly
>> turned abusive, and that's coloring your perception of everything I
>> wrote. If it bothers you so greatly,
>>
> HUH???? You think *I* care... or for and even better laugh - that
> anyone else here bases their opinion about me on what you think?
>
>> I suggest you killfile me. Your harping will only make things worse, I
>> assure you.
>
> Hm. I haven't alluded even once to killing you, but you do know that
> when I get fed up with you that's what I do. So, I suggest that *you*
> kill file me because it seems I'm the one who is setting you off.

Another simple fact for a simpleton: The post you quoted was a response to
Om. Not you. Om's the one with the bug up her butt.


> So, it's up to you to kill me. Do it. I dare you.
>
> Bet you can't, 'cause you're addicted to me... besides, I know you and
> you're not this ugly online personality. OK, now I've said it.
> You're a nice guy.
>
> <smooches>
>
>

Well, okay then. <smooches back> :-)

Bob

Bob Terwilliger wrote:
> Clueless AOL newbie Sheldon "Pussy" Katz wrote:
>
>>> Does "EVERYONE" consist of sf, Peter-puller, Pussy, and cyber****?
>>
>> How swell of you to project the tip if the iceberg acknowleging some
>> of those who you realize have higher intelligence and intimidate
>
> I'm glad to see you acknowledging your long-standing nickname, Pussy.
> Most of the time you're too addled to recognize it.
>
> Bob


Sorry Bob, but that put you into the kill file. It is a shame because
I'll miss some good food posts from you... but the signal to noise ratio
just isn't worth it anymore.

George L

On Sat, 6 Mar 2010 01:38:33 -0800, "Bob Terwilliger"
> wrote:

> Simple fact for a simpleton: ANNATTO IS NOT SYNTHETIC. You made a decision
> based on ignorance in those long-bygone days, and now you're attempting to
> defend that decision with more ignorance. It's all well and good to care for
> your children, but you have to educate yourself so that you can make GOOD
> decisions about their care.

Oh? So, you're now trying to tell me that synthetic dyes were *not*
used back in the '70s? How lame is that? Do you think they use
annatto now just out of the goodness of their wholesome hearts? Yeah,
right and that's why McDonald's stopped using beef fat too.

> Case in point: Parents who feed their toddlers a
> vegan diet are malnourishing those kids because the nutritional needs of
> kids are different from the nutritional needs for adults. But the parents
> THINK that they're doing what's best, and it's all for the good of the
> children.

Making connections that don't exist again, huh?

--
I love cooking with wine.
Sometimes I even put it in the food.