A very vocal advocate of the Kane for self defense.

Excellent at concealing flints and broken CD shards

Able to cook up a fuss while on the beat...

The Riddler wrote:

> A very vocal advocate of the Kane for self defense.
>
> Excellent at concealing flints and broken CD shards
>
> Able to cook up a fuss while on the beat...
>
>
>
>

Is it "Who is a Troll?" ;-p

On Mar 11, 10:31*am, "The Riddler" > wrote:
> A very vocal advocate of the Kane for self defense.
>
> Excellent at concealing flints and broken CD shards
>
> Able to cook up a fuss while on the beat...

Who is...Chuck Norris?

In article >,
Chilla > wrote:

> The Riddler wrote:
>
> > A very vocal advocate of the Kane for self defense.
> >
> > Excellent at concealing flints and broken CD shards
> >
> > Able to cook up a fuss while on the beat...
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> Is it "Who is a Troll?" ;-p

<laughs> True!
--
Peace! Om

"Human nature seems to be to control other people until they put their foot down."
--Steve Rothstein

Web Albums: <http://picasaweb.google.com/OMPOmelet>

Subscribe:

On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 18:48:24 -0600, Omelet > wrote in
rec.scuba:

>In article >,
> Chilla > wrote:
>
>> The Riddler wrote:
>>
>> > A very vocal advocate of the Kane for self defense.
>> >
>> > Excellent at concealing flints and broken CD shards
>> >
>> > Able to cook up a fuss while on the beat...
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>> Is it "Who is a Troll?" ;-p
>
><laughs> True!

Which group are you replying from?

In article >,
John Hanson > wrote:

> On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 18:48:24 -0600, Omelet > wrote in
> rec.scuba:
>
> >In article >,
> > Chilla > wrote:
> >
> >> The Riddler wrote:
> >>
> >> > A very vocal advocate of the Kane for self defense.
> >> >
> >> > Excellent at concealing flints and broken CD shards
> >> >
> >> > Able to cook up a fuss while on the beat...
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >> Is it "Who is a Troll?" ;-p
> >
> ><laughs> True!
>
> Which group are you replying from?

rec.food.cooking

Been awhile, how are you doing?
--
Peace! Om

"Human nature seems to be to control other people until they put their foot down."
--Steve Rothstein

Web Albums: <http://picasaweb.google.com/OMPOmelet>

Subscribe:

On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 04:43:03 -0600, Omelet > wrote in
rec.scuba:

>In article >,
> John Hanson > wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 18:48:24 -0600, Omelet > wrote in
>> rec.scuba:
>>
>> >In article >,
>> > Chilla > wrote:
>> >
>> >> The Riddler wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > A very vocal advocate of the Kane for self defense.
>> >> >
>> >> > Excellent at concealing flints and broken CD shards
>> >> >
>> >> > Able to cook up a fuss while on the beat...
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> Is it "Who is a Troll?" ;-p
>> >
>> ><laughs> True!
>>
>> Which group are you replying from?
>
>rec.food.cooking
>
>Been awhile, how are you doing?

I'm doing well. I spent a week in Cozumel earlier this year and am heading to
Florida in a week and a half. How about you?

In article >,
John Hanson > wrote:

> >> Which group are you replying from?
> >
> >rec.food.cooking
> >
> >Been awhile, how are you doing?
>
> I'm doing well. I spent a week in Cozumel earlier this year and am heading to
> Florida in a week and a half. How about you?

Sounds like fun. It's been awhile since I've been in the water.
Other than doing intensive job hunting, things are ok...
--
Peace! Om

"Human nature seems to be to control other people until they put their foot down."
--Steve Rothstein

Web Albums: <http://picasaweb.google.com/OMPOmelet>

Subscribe:

On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 12:56:11 -0600, Omelet > wrote in
rec.scuba:

>In article >,
> John Hanson > wrote:
>
>> >> Which group are you replying from?
>> >
>> >rec.food.cooking
>> >
>> >Been awhile, how are you doing?
>>
>> I'm doing well. I spent a week in Cozumel earlier this year and am heading to
>> Florida in a week and a half. How about you?
>
>Sounds like fun. It's been awhile since I've been in the water.
>Other than doing intensive job hunting, things are ok...

I'm doing the warm water stuff for a change. And who knows, I might be doing
more of that this year depending on how my trip goes with my travel companion.

In article >,
John Hanson > wrote:

> On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 12:56:11 -0600, Omelet > wrote in
> rec.scuba:
>
> >In article >,
> > John Hanson > wrote:
> >
> >> >> Which group are you replying from?
> >> >
> >> >rec.food.cooking
> >> >
> >> >Been awhile, how are you doing?
> >>
> >> I'm doing well. I spent a week in Cozumel earlier this year and am
> >> heading to
> >> Florida in a week and a half. How about you?
> >
> >Sounds like fun. It's been awhile since I've been in the water.
> >Other than doing intensive job hunting, things are ok...
>
> I'm doing the warm water stuff for a change. And who knows, I might be doing
> more of that this year depending on how my trip goes with my travel
> companion.

Be safe. :-)
--
Peace! Om

"Human nature seems to be to control other people until they put their foot down."
--Steve Rothstein

Web Albums: <http://picasaweb.google.com/OMPOmelet>

Subscribe:

On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 16:17:22 -0600, Omelet wrote:

> In article >,
> John Hanson > wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 12:56:11 -0600, Omelet > wrote in
>> rec.scuba:
>>
>>>In article >,
>>> John Hanson > wrote:
>>>
>>>> >> Which group are you replying from?
>>>> >
>>>> >rec.food.cooking
>>>> >
>>>> >Been awhile, how are you doing?
>>>>
>>>> I'm doing well. I spent a week in Cozumel earlier this year and am
>>>> heading to
>>>> Florida in a week and a half. How about you?
>>>
>>>Sounds like fun. It's been awhile since I've been in the water.
>>>Other than doing intensive job hunting, things are ok...
>>
>> I'm doing the warm water stuff for a change. And who knows, I might be doing
>> more of that this year depending on how my trip goes with my travel
>> companion.
>
> Be safe. :-)

I can see maybe one email being accidentally being posted to Usenet,
but a whole thread all meant to be email?

Uh, Hello! McFly!

-sw

On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 20:26:04 -0600, Sqwertz > wrote in
rec.scuba:

>On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 16:17:22 -0600, Omelet wrote:
>
>> In article >,
>> John Hanson > wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 12:56:11 -0600, Omelet > wrote in
>>> rec.scuba:
>>>
>>>>In article >,
>>>> John Hanson > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> >> Which group are you replying from?
>>>>> >
>>>>> >rec.food.cooking
>>>>> >
>>>>> >Been awhile, how are you doing?
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm doing well. I spent a week in Cozumel earlier this year and am
>>>>> heading to
>>>>> Florida in a week and a half. How about you?
>>>>
>>>>Sounds like fun. It's been awhile since I've been in the water.
>>>>Other than doing intensive job hunting, things are ok...
>>>
>>> I'm doing the warm water stuff for a change. And who knows, I might be doing
>>> more of that this year depending on how my trip goes with my travel
>>> companion.
>>
>> Be safe. :-)
>
>I can see maybe one email being accidentally being posted to Usenet,
>but a whole thread all meant to be email?
>
>Uh, Hello! McFly!
>
This isn't an email, you idiot.

On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 22:42:20 -0600, John Hanson
> wrote:

> This isn't an email, you idiot.

This is not the first time someone has posted an email to Usenet. Get
over it.

--
I love cooking with wine.
Sometimes I even put it in the food.

On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 21:25:41 -0800, sf wrote:

> On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 22:42:20 -0600, John Hanson
> > wrote:
>
>> This isn't an email, you idiot.
>
> This is not the first time someone has posted an email to Usenet. Get
> over it.

Anybody else worried about Barbara lately?

-sw

sf > wrote in :

> On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 22:42:20 -0600, John Hanson
> > wrote:
>
>> This isn't an email, you idiot.
>
> This is not the first time someone has posted an email to Usenet. Get
> over it.
>


Stop crossposting to non-cooking/food groups, sf.



--
Peter Lucas
Brisbane
Australia

All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.

Edmund Burke.

sf replied:

>> This isn't an email, you idiot.
>
> This is not the first time someone has posted an email to Usenet. Get
> over it.

Christ-on-a-crutch, am I the only one who reads for comprehension any more?

When Sqwertz wrote, "I can see maybe one email being accidentally being
posted to Usenet, but a whole thread all meant to be email?" he meant that
the entire exchange between Om and John Hanson SHOULD have been handled
through e-mail rather than posted to the entire group. It's a matter of
elementary netiquette. Neither you nor John seemed to get that simple
obvious point.

Bob

On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 21:48:14 -0800, "Bob Terwilliger"
> wrote:

> sf replied:
>
> >> This isn't an email, you idiot.
> >
> > This is not the first time someone has posted an email to Usenet. Get
> > over it.
>
> Christ-on-a-crutch, am I the only one who reads for comprehension any more?
>
> When Sqwertz wrote, "I can see maybe one email being accidentally being
> posted to Usenet, but a whole thread all meant to be email?" he meant that
> the entire exchange between Om and John Hanson SHOULD have been handled
> through e-mail rather than posted to the entire group. It's a matter of
> elementary netiquette. Neither you nor John seemed to get that simple
> obvious point.
>
In case you haven't noticed, squertz is in my KF and I responded to
Jon, not him. You need to take a chill pill. I can do very well w/o
reading anything from you. BTDT - can do it again.

--
I love cooking with wine.
Sometimes I even put it in the food.

On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 21:25:41 -0800, sf > wrote in rec.scuba:

>On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 22:42:20 -0600, John Hanson
> wrote:
>
>> This isn't an email, you idiot.
>
>This is not the first time someone has posted an email to Usenet. Get
>over it.

I'm posting from rec.scuba. We chit chat all the time.

On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 21:48:14 -0800, "Bob Terwilliger"
> wrote in rec.scuba:

>sf replied:
>
>>> This isn't an email, you idiot.
>>
>> This is not the first time someone has posted an email to Usenet. Get
>> over it.
>
>Christ-on-a-crutch, am I the only one who reads for comprehension any more?
>
>When Sqwertz wrote, "I can see maybe one email being accidentally being
>posted to Usenet, but a whole thread all meant to be email?" he meant that
>the entire exchange between Om and John Hanson SHOULD have been handled
>through e-mail rather than posted to the entire group. It's a matter of
>elementary netiquette. Neither you nor John seemed to get that simple
>obvious point.
>
Blow me Bob

John Hanson wrote:

>>sf replied:
>>
>>>> This isn't an email, you idiot.
>>>
>>> This is not the first time someone has posted an email to Usenet. Get
>>> over it.
>>
>> Christ-on-a-crutch, am I the only one who reads for comprehension any
>> more?
>>
>> When Sqwertz wrote, "I can see maybe one email being accidentally being
>> posted to Usenet, but a whole thread all meant to be email?" he meant
>> that the entire exchange between Om and John Hanson SHOULD have been
>> handled through e-mail rather than posted to the entire group. It's a
>> matter of elementary netiquette. Neither you nor John seemed to get that
>> simple obvious point.
>>
> Blow me Bob


Great comeback. You're just FULL of wit, aren't you, defending your lack of
comprehension and ignorance of netiquette with a sexual proposition?

Shouldn't you be going down again?

Bob

In article >,
Sqwertz > wrote:

> On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 16:17:22 -0600, Omelet wrote:
>
> > In article >,
> > John Hanson > wrote:
> >
> >> On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 12:56:11 -0600, Omelet > wrote in
> >> rec.scuba:
> >>
> >>>In article >,
> >>> John Hanson > wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> >> Which group are you replying from?
> >>>> >
> >>>> >rec.food.cooking
> >>>> >
> >>>> >Been awhile, how are you doing?
> >>>>
> >>>> I'm doing well. I spent a week in Cozumel earlier this year and am
> >>>> heading to
> >>>> Florida in a week and a half. How about you?
> >>>
> >>>Sounds like fun. It's been awhile since I've been in the water.
> >>>Other than doing intensive job hunting, things are ok...
> >>
> >> I'm doing the warm water stuff for a change. And who knows, I might be
> >> doing
> >> more of that this year depending on how my trip goes with my travel
> >> companion.
> >
> > Be safe. :-)
>
> I can see maybe one email being accidentally being posted to Usenet,
> but a whole thread all meant to be email?
>
> Uh, Hello! McFly!
>
> -sw

Hey, at least I snipped the rest of the cross posts as I knew where he
was posting from. :-)
--
Peace! Om

"Human nature seems to be to control other people until they put their foot down."
--Steve Rothstein

Web Albums: <http://picasaweb.google.com/OMPOmelet>

Subscribe:

In article >,
Sqwertz > wrote:

> On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 21:25:41 -0800, sf wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 22:42:20 -0600, John Hanson
> > > wrote:
> >
> >> This isn't an email, you idiot.
> >
> > This is not the first time someone has posted an email to Usenet. Get
> > over it.
>
> Anybody else worried about Barbara lately?
>
> -sw

Not particularly. :-)
--
Peace! Om

"Human nature seems to be to control other people until they put their foot down."
--Steve Rothstein

Web Albums: <http://picasaweb.google.com/OMPOmelet>

Subscribe:

In article >,
"Bob Terwilliger" > wrote:

> sf replied:
>
> >> This isn't an email, you idiot.
> >
> > This is not the first time someone has posted an email to Usenet. Get
> > over it.
>
> Christ-on-a-crutch, am I the only one who reads for comprehension any more?
>
> When Sqwertz wrote, "I can see maybe one email being accidentally being
> posted to Usenet, but a whole thread all meant to be email?" he meant that
> the entire exchange between Om and John Hanson SHOULD have been handled
> through e-mail rather than posted to the entire group. It's a matter of
> elementary netiquette. Neither you nor John seemed to get that simple
> obvious point.
>
> Bob

Oh chill. He was just saying "hi" and it was a short thread. I don't
generally post to rec.scuba. We knew each other from
misc.fitness.weights and I've not posted there for a few months...
--
Peace! Om

"Human nature seems to be to control other people until they put their foot down."
--Steve Rothstein

Web Albums: <http://picasaweb.google.com/OMPOmelet>

Subscribe:

In article >,
John Hanson > wrote:

> On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 21:25:41 -0800, sf > wrote in rec.scuba:
>
> >On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 22:42:20 -0600, John Hanson
> > wrote:
> >
> >> This isn't an email, you idiot.
> >
> >This is not the first time someone has posted an email to Usenet. Get
> >over it.
>
> I'm posting from rec.scuba. We chit chat all the time.

Some people here (r.f.c.) are a bit OCD. <g>
--
Peace! Om

"Human nature seems to be to control other people until they put their foot down."
--Steve Rothstein

Web Albums: <http://picasaweb.google.com/OMPOmelet>

Subscribe:

Omelet > wrote in newsmpomelet-F385B4.01174014032010
@news-wc.giganews.com:

> In article >,
> Sqwertz > wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 21:25:41 -0800, sf wrote:
>>
>> > On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 22:42:20 -0600, John Hanson
>> > > wrote:
>> >
>> >> This isn't an email, you idiot.
>> >
>> > This is not the first time someone has posted an email to Usenet. Get
>> > over it.
>>
>> Anybody else worried about Barbara lately?
>>
>> -sw
>
> Not particularly. :-)


And here I was thinking you two were best mates!!

She has been acting a little 'weird' of late.

Omelet > wrote in
news
> In article >,
> John Hanson > wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 21:25:41 -0800, sf > wrote in
>> rec.scuba:
>>
>> >On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 22:42:20 -0600, John Hanson
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> This isn't an email, you idiot.
>> >
>> >This is not the first time someone has posted an email to Usenet.
>> >Get over it.
>>
>> I'm posting from rec.scuba. We chit chat all the time.
>
> Some people here (r.f.c.) are a bit OCD. <g>



A *bit*????!!!!!!!

That's an understatement if ever I saw one ;-)

In article >,
PeterL2 > wrote:

> Omelet > wrote in newsmpomelet-F385B4.01174014032010
> @news-wc.giganews.com:
>
> > In article >,
> > Sqwertz > wrote:
> >
> >> On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 21:25:41 -0800, sf wrote:
> >>
> >> > On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 22:42:20 -0600, John Hanson
> >> > > wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> This isn't an email, you idiot.
> >> >
> >> > This is not the first time someone has posted an email to Usenet. Get
> >> > over it.
> >>
> >> Anybody else worried about Barbara lately?
> >>
> >> -sw
> >
> > Not particularly. :-)
>
>
> And here I was thinking you two were best mates!!

We are.
>
> She has been acting a little 'weird' of late.

No, I think she's just a realist. :-) People have been picking on her
and she has a right to defend herself.
--
Peace! Om

"Human nature seems to be to control other people until they put their foot down."
--Steve Rothstein

Web Albums: <http://picasaweb.google.com/OMPOmelet>

Subscribe:

In article >,
PeterL2 > wrote:

> Omelet > wrote in
> news >
> > In article >,
> > John Hanson > wrote:
> >
> >> On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 21:25:41 -0800, sf > wrote in
> >> rec.scuba:
> >>
> >> >On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 22:42:20 -0600, John Hanson
> >> > wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> This isn't an email, you idiot.
> >> >
> >> >This is not the first time someone has posted an email to Usenet.
> >> >Get over it.
> >>
> >> I'm posting from rec.scuba. We chit chat all the time.
> >
> > Some people here (r.f.c.) are a bit OCD. <g>
>
>
>
> A *bit*????!!!!!!!
>
> That's an understatement if ever I saw one ;-)

<snork> ;-)
--
Peace! Om

"Human nature seems to be to control other people until they put their foot down."
--Steve Rothstein

Web Albums: <http://picasaweb.google.com/OMPOmelet>

Subscribe:

"Bob Terwilliger" > wrote in message
...
> sf replied:
>
>>> This isn't an email, you idiot.
>>
>> This is not the first time someone has posted an email to Usenet. Get
>> over it.
>
> Christ-on-a-crutch, am I the only one who reads for comprehension any
> more?
>
> When Sqwertz wrote, "I can see maybe one email being accidentally being
> posted to Usenet, but a whole thread all meant to be email?" he meant that
> the entire exchange between Om and John Hanson SHOULD have been handled
> through e-mail rather than posted to the entire group. It's a matter of
> elementary netiquette. Neither you nor John seemed to get that simple
> obvious point.
>
> Bob

"Elementary netiquette"??

Holy Christ, a rule-book thumping Usenet poster.

It must be Spring.

I thought all you geek-**** OCD net cop ****wits were dead by the late
'90s.

For you and your buddy to cry and stomp over a couple of simple exchanges
just marks yourselves as a couple of "really need to get a life" jackasses.




--
--
Popeye
"If one does as God does enough times, one
will become as God is." -Dr. Hannibal Lector.

www.finalprotectivefire.com
http://picasaweb.google.com/Popeye8762

Popeye wrote:

> "Elementary netiquette"??
>
> Holy Christ, a rule-book thumping Usenet poster.

No, there are no real rules. Only etiquette. You're obviously uncomfortable
with the idea. Much like your mother must have been.

Bob

"Douglas W. \"Popeye\" Frederick" > wrote in
m:

>
> "Bob Terwilliger" > wrote in message
> ...
>> sf replied:
>>
>>>> This isn't an email, you idiot.
>>>
>>> This is not the first time someone has posted an email to Usenet.
>>> Get over it.
>>
>> Christ-on-a-crutch, am I the only one who reads for comprehension any
>> more?
>>
>> When Sqwertz wrote, "I can see maybe one email being accidentally
>> being posted to Usenet, but a whole thread all meant to be email?" he
>> meant that the entire exchange between Om and John Hanson SHOULD have
>> been handled through e-mail rather than posted to the entire group.
>> It's a matter of elementary netiquette. Neither you nor John seemed
>> to get that simple obvious point.
>>
>> Bob
>
> "Elementary netiquette"??
>
> Holy Christ, a rule-book thumping Usenet poster.
>
> It must be Spring.
>
> I thought all you geek-**** OCD net cop ****wits were dead by the
> late
> '90s.
>
> For you and your buddy to cry and stomp over a couple of simple
> exchanges
> just marks yourselves as a couple of "really need to get a life"
> jackasses.
>
>
>
>


ROFLMAO!!!

Well said!!!

"Bob Terwilliger" > wrote in message
...
> Popeye wrote:
>
>> "Elementary netiquette"??
>>
>> Holy Christ, a rule-book thumping Usenet poster.
>
> No, there are no real rules. Only etiquette.

Sniveling isn't etiquette.

>You're obviously uncomfortable with the idea. Much like your mother must
>have been.

I could have been your father, but a dog beat me up the stairs.

Oh, and, you're right.

My mother was a liberal psyche professor.

She wouldn't give a damn about your false etiquette.

--
--
Popeye
"If one does as God does enough times, one
will become as God is." -Dr. Hannibal Lector.

www.finalprotectivefire.com
http://picasaweb.google.com/Popeye8762

In article >,
PeterL2 > wrote:

> "Douglas W. \"Popeye\" Frederick" > wrote in
> m:
>
> >
> > "Bob Terwilliger" > wrote in message
> > ...
> >> sf replied:
> >>
> >>>> This isn't an email, you idiot.
> >>>
> >>> This is not the first time someone has posted an email to Usenet.
> >>> Get over it.
> >>
> >> Christ-on-a-crutch, am I the only one who reads for comprehension any
> >> more?
> >>
> >> When Sqwertz wrote, "I can see maybe one email being accidentally
> >> being posted to Usenet, but a whole thread all meant to be email?" he
> >> meant that the entire exchange between Om and John Hanson SHOULD have
> >> been handled through e-mail rather than posted to the entire group.
> >> It's a matter of elementary netiquette. Neither you nor John seemed
> >> to get that simple obvious point.
> >>
> >> Bob
> >
> > "Elementary netiquette"??
> >
> > Holy Christ, a rule-book thumping Usenet poster.
> >
> > It must be Spring.
> >
> > I thought all you geek-**** OCD net cop ****wits were dead by the
> > late
> > '90s.
> >
> > For you and your buddy to cry and stomp over a couple of simple
> > exchanges
> > just marks yourselves as a couple of "really need to get a life"
> > jackasses.
> >
>
> ROFLMAO!!!
>
> Well said!!!

Oh boy, here we go... <sigh>
--
Peace! Om

"Human nature seems to be to control other people until they put their foot down."
--Steve Rothstein

Web Albums: <http://picasaweb.google.com/OMPOmelet>

Subscribe:

Omelet > wrote in
news
> In article >,
> PeterL2 > wrote:

>> And here I was thinking you two were best mates!!
>
> We are.
>>
>> She has been acting a little 'weird' of late.
>
> No, I think she's just a realist. :-)


There's a huge difference between being a realist and being intentionally
vague/obtuse..... and not to mention 'spacy'.


> People have been picking on her
> and she has a right to defend herself.


*Nobody* has been "picking on her". I have been the one having a lengthy
(cordial on my part) conversation with her, which resulted in her sulking
off and sin binning me because I was pointing out that she was incorrect.

I stated my case clearly, conscicely, and to the point..... and yet she
argued black and blue that I was wrong and that I was having a go at her!!

It wasn't until the 3rd or 4th person pointed the same thing out to her
that she went "Oh, I was thinking of something else"?? WTF??

We were talking about pots of boiling stock..... and she was thinking of a
'solid'??

Nahhhhhhhhh....... she's outta whack somewhere in there.




--
Peter Lucas
Brisbane
Australia

All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.

Edmund Burke.

"Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick" > wrote in message
m...
>
> "Bob Terwilliger" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Popeye wrote:
>>
>>> "Elementary netiquette"??
>>>
>>> Holy Christ, a rule-book thumping Usenet poster.
>>
>> No, there are no real rules. Only etiquette.
>
> Sniveling isn't etiquette.
>
>>You're obviously uncomfortable with the idea. Much like your mother must
>>have been.
>
> I could have been your father, but a dog beat me up the stairs.
>
> Oh, and, you're right.
>
> My mother was a liberal psyche professor.
>
> She wouldn't give a damn about your false etiquette.
>
> --
> --

Oh, I see you've met Fat Boy Terwiliger.

In article > ,
"Douglas W. \"Popeye\" Frederick" > wrote:

> >You're obviously uncomfortable with the idea. Much like your mother must
> >have been.
>
> I could have been your father, but a dog beat me up the stairs.

Nothing personal Bob, but that's one of the funniest things I've read in
weeks. <lol>

Douglas, you are quite the wit. ;-)
--
Peace! Om

"Human nature seems to be to control other people until they put their foot down."
--Steve Rothstein

Web Albums: <http://picasaweb.google.com/OMPOmelet>

Subscribe:

"Omelet" > wrote in message
news
> In article > ,
> "Douglas W. \"Popeye\" Frederick" > wrote:
>
>> >You're obviously uncomfortable with the idea. Much like your mother must
>> >have been.
>>
>> I could have been your father, but a dog beat me up the stairs.
>
> Nothing personal Bob, but that's one of the funniest things I've read in
> weeks. <lol>
>
> Douglas, you are quite the wit. ;-)

Just wait till you meet. He's the same way.
He is what he is.

Dennis

"John Hanson" > wrote in message
...

> Blow me Bob

There it is.

"Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick" > wrote in message
m...

> "Elementary netiquette"??
>
> Holy Christ, a rule-book thumping Usenet poster.
>
> It must be Spring.

Jammer sends his love.

On Sun, 14 Mar 2010 02:44:21 -0600, Omelet wrote:

> No, I think she's just a realist. :-) People have been picking on her
> and she has a right to defend herself.

She's going out of her way to be a putz, though. And to people who
have never said "Boo!" to her.

-sw