Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
We are looking at the double wide refrigerators with the bottom freezers.
I am leaning towards the 28 cu. ft. size. Seen a couple of nice ones in the $2,000 to $2,200 range. Anyone have one of these, and if so, would appreciate caveats and things you do and don't like about them. Mainly, we need a larger refrigerator for just the refrigerated items. The freezer would get used, too, but we have a freezer only in the garage, and a combo freezer/fridge. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article >,
"Steve B" > wrote: > We are looking at the double wide refrigerators with the bottom freezers. > > I am leaning towards the 28 cu. ft. size. Seen a couple of nice ones in the > $2,000 to $2,200 range. > > Anyone have one of these, and if so, would appreciate caveats and things you > do and don't like about them. Mainly, we need a larger refrigerator for > just the refrigerated items. The freezer would get used, too, but we have a > freezer only in the garage, and a combo freezer/fridge. Seriously Steve, look at ebay for those used blood bank refrigerators. I got my 40 cubic ft. Hobart from the lab I work at for nothing. There are several on ebay at the moment and some of them are quite reasonable... Craigs list might have one local to you. Many labs across the country now sell outdated equipment on the internet as they upgrade. -- Peace! Om Web Albums: <http://picasaweb.google.com/OMPOmelet> *Only Irish *coffee provides in a single glass all four *essential food groups: alcohol, caffeine, sugar *and fat. --Alex Levine |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In news:rec.food.cooking, "Steve B" > posted
on Sun, 11 Apr 2010 23:41:21 -0700 the following: > We are looking at the double wide refrigerators with the bottom > freezers. > > I am leaning towards the 28 cu. ft. size. Seen a couple of nice ones > in the $2,000 to $2,200 range. > > Anyone have one of these, and if so, would appreciate caveats and things > you do and don't like about them. Mainly, we need a larger refrigerator > for just the refrigerated items. The freezer would get used, too, but > we have a freezer only in the garage, and a combo freezer/fridge. First, how old are you? My friend's parents (aged 77 and 79) have one of those fridges with the freezer on the bottom, and to me, it's painful to see either one of them have to get down on their hands and knees just to get a glass of ice. Recently, the wife side of that couple fell down and hurt herself pretty badly, and my friend thinks she's going to need a walker for the rest of her life. She had trouble getting up and down before she got that fridge, and I never have been able to figure out why on Earth she wanted one like that in the first place. I would hate it. I haven't lain on a creeper yet to see how the ice machine is set up, but when I saw my friend's brother on his hands and knees digging for ice (since he can get down on the floor more easily than his parents), it appeared that the ice maker was attached to the top of the inside, and container for the ice was on a shelf. All that said, if you already have a fridge/freezer combo, then maybe it won't be any big deal to have a freezer on the bottom on your new one. We've got a small chest deep freezer on the back patio, a big chest deep freezer and a freezer/fridge (freezer on top) in the utility room, and a freezer/fridge (side-by-side) in the kitchen. Even with all that, I don't think I'd want a bottom-style freezer. I'd get rid of two fridges if we could get a matching set of those stainless steel units that is just a fridge on one, and just a self-defrosting freezer on the other. Then we'd still have the two chest freezers. ![]() Damaeus -- "Marihuana influences Negroes to look at white people in the eye, step on white men's shadows and look at a white woman twice." -William Randolph Hearst |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Damaeus wrote:
> First, how old are you? My friend's parents (aged 77 and 79) have one of > those fridges with the freezer on the bottom, and to me, it's painful to > see either one of them have to get down on their hands and knees just to > get a glass of ice. huh? I don't have to do anything more strenuous than bend at the waist to get to my ice. The ice maker is at the top of the bottom freezer space. And it is still higher up than a fruit/veggie bin at the bottom of a top-freezer unit. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Steve B wrote:
> We are looking at the double wide refrigerators with the bottom freezers. > > I am leaning towards the 28 cu. ft. size. Seen a couple of nice ones in the > $2,000 to $2,200 range. > > Anyone have one of these, and if so, would appreciate caveats and things you > do and don't like about them. Mainly, we need a larger refrigerator for > just the refrigerated items. The freezer would get used, too, but we have a > freezer only in the garage, and a combo freezer/fridge. > > I have had one since November. The refrigerator seems much less spacious than my old 20cu ft. top freezer model, probably because the freezer is larger and much of the fridge storage is in the door bins. I really love having the freezer on the bottom, however. gloria p |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article >,
"Steve B" > wrote: > We are looking at the double wide refrigerators with the bottom freezers. > > I am leaning towards the 28 cu. ft. size. Seen a couple of nice ones in the > $2,000 to $2,200 range. > > Anyone have one of these, and if so, would appreciate caveats and things you > do and don't like about them. Mainly, we need a larger refrigerator for > just the refrigerated items. The freezer would get used, too, but we have a > freezer only in the garage, and a combo freezer/fridge. I have an Amana, 22cf. I will love it until the day they put me in it for storage. When my old Kenmore did its death dance some years ago, I sashayed over to Warners-Stellian to select its replacement -- all I wanted was essentially what I'd had. I got the same total cf, BUT, in the time between the dying one and the new one, the industry standard changed on the ratio of chiller space to freezer space. I wasn't paying attention. When I chose the new one, a Whirlpool, two door, freezer on top, I had the most fleeting thought through my head that the bottom of the freezer section door was lower that on the dying one. FLEETING thought I paid no attention to. When I got the sucker home and started transferring contents from one to 'tother, I had a hard time getting everything into the fridge. W T F ??? Total cf was the same. . . . The new model, while having the same total cf had more freezer space and less chiller space that its predecessor. In the years between the old and the new, the amount of freezer space in supermarkets increased DRAMATICALLY people had a lot more stuff in their freezers besides vegetables and ice cream. I bitched about that unit for three years. My friend The Late Widow Geraldine had bought a bottom-freezer unit and I loved it. I wanted it. I got one. Gave the old one (all of 3 miserable years old) to a church organization. My freezer compartment is a pullout drawer with a sliding basket in part of it. It is VERY easy to access. I do not have an icemaker; I make ice cubes. NO WAY would I go back to a top freezer unit and am reminded of it every time I reach for something in the vegetable drawers, the lowest part of that fridge storage at low hip height. Accessing ANYthing in the freezer is very easy because I can pull the drawer way out, and it's a bend-at-the-waist to get at anything. If that were the chiller space in a conventional arrangement, I'd be on my knees trying to find something at the back of a shelf, it would be that low. I shudder at the very idea. Getting down isn't the problem; getting up is. :-/ I'll never go back to a freezer-fridge combo with the freezer unit on top, and I've never been impressed by the side-by-side freezer/fridge configuration. HTH. -- Barb, Mother Superior, HOSSSPoJ http://web.me.com/barbschaller Updated 4-11-2010 |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article >,
Damaeus > wrote: > First, how old are you? My friend's parents (aged 77 and 79) have one of > those fridges with the freezer on the bottom, and to me, it's painful to > see either one of them have to get down on their hands and knees just to > get a glass of ice. > Damaeus ???? I'm having a hard time picturing this. My ice cubes (bottom freezer) are at knee level and I barely have to bend at the waist to get to them. -- Barb, Mother Superior, HOSSSPoJ http://web.me.com/barbschaller Updated 4-11-2010 |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Melba's Jammin' wrote: > > In article >, > "Steve B" > wrote: > > > We are looking at the double wide refrigerators with the bottom freezers. > > > > I am leaning towards the 28 cu. ft. size. Seen a couple of nice ones in the > > $2,000 to $2,200 range. > > > > Anyone have one of these, and if so, would appreciate caveats and things you > > do and don't like about them. Mainly, we need a larger refrigerator for > > just the refrigerated items. The freezer would get used, too, but we have a > > freezer only in the garage, and a combo freezer/fridge. > > I have an Amana, 22cf. I will love it until the day they put me in it > for storage. > > When my old Kenmore did its death dance some years ago, I sashayed over > to Warners-Stellian to select its replacement -- all I wanted was > essentially what I'd had. I got the same total cf, BUT, in the time > between the dying one and the new one, the industry standard changed on > the ratio of chiller space to freezer space. I wasn't paying attention. > When I chose the new one, a Whirlpool, two door, freezer on top, I had > the most fleeting thought through my head that the bottom of the freezer > section door was lower that on the dying one. FLEETING thought I paid > no attention to. When I got the sucker home and started transferring > contents from one to 'tother, I had a hard time getting everything into > the fridge. W T F ??? Total cf was the same. . . . The new model, > while having the same total cf had more freezer space and less chiller > space that its predecessor. In the years between the old and the new, > the amount of freezer space in supermarkets increased DRAMATICALLY > people had a lot more stuff in their freezers besides vegetables and ice > cream. > > I bitched about that unit for three years. My friend The Late Widow > Geraldine had bought a bottom-freezer unit and I loved it. I wanted it. > I got one. Gave the old one (all of 3 miserable years old) to a church > organization. > > My freezer compartment is a pullout drawer with a sliding basket in part > of it. It is VERY easy to access. I do not have an icemaker; I make > ice cubes. > > NO WAY would I go back to a top freezer unit and am reminded of it every > time I reach for something in the vegetable drawers, the lowest part of > that fridge storage at low hip height. Accessing ANYthing in the > freezer is very easy because I can pull the drawer way out, and it's a > bend-at-the-waist to get at anything. If that were the chiller space in > a conventional arrangement, I'd be on my knees trying to find something > at the back of a shelf, it would be that low. I shudder at the very > idea. Getting down isn't the problem; getting up is. :-/ > > I'll never go back to a freezer-fridge combo with the freezer unit on > top, and I've never been impressed by the side-by-side freezer/fridge > configuration. I generally prefer a side-by-side configuration if it's the only cold storage around. With the side-by-side, you can organize both the refrigerator and freezer sides in a top-down, most frequently used setup so everything you use frequently is at no-bend height. I also like and frequently use the in-door ice and water dispenser. The bottom drawer freezer models are decent enough, though they typically result in more stacking of items and more time spent shuffling through those stacks looking for what you want. I also prefer the single door models over the double door models as it seems that the double door models just make the door storage less useable and the half door you open is rarely the one you need to reach what you wanted on the regular shelves so you have to open the other as well. The mini pass-through doors that are available on some refrigerators are of limited value and probably not worth bothering with. If you have auxiliary cold storage in the garage or similar your organization can be different and thus the needs for the kitchen cold storage may vary. In all cases, the horrid top freezer models that require bending over nearly every time you access the refrigerator should be banned as ergonomic disasters. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Melba's Jammin' wrote:
> In article >, > Damaeus > wrote: >> First, how old are you? My friend's parents (aged 77 and 79) have one of >> those fridges with the freezer on the bottom, and to me, it's painful to >> see either one of them have to get down on their hands and knees just to >> get a glass of ice. >> Damaeus > > ???? I'm having a hard time picturing this. My ice cubes (bottom > freezer) are at knee level and I barely have to bend at the waist to get > to them. > I agree with Ms. Jammin' I am quite short and the slide-out drawer containing the icemaker bin in the lower freezer is just about knee level. No kneeling required. gloria p |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article >,
"Steve B" > wrote: > We are looking at the double wide refrigerators with the bottom freezers. > > I am leaning towards the 28 cu. ft. size. Seen a couple of nice ones in the > $2,000 to $2,200 range. > > Anyone have one of these, and if so, would appreciate caveats and things you > do and don't like about them. Mainly, we need a larger refrigerator for > just the refrigerated items. The freezer would get used, too, but we have a > freezer only in the garage, and a combo freezer/fridge. I posted about our refrigerator research a couple of months ago. We wound up buying a Samsung French door 26 cu. foot refrigerator. It's been in exactly a month and we really, really like it. We decided against anything with an in-door ice and/or water dispenser b/c it takes up too much room on the inside door. The bottom freezer has a sliding tray for smaller items and a "pizza" door for those honkin' big frozen pizzas. The way the freezer is configured, you'd have to work at it to "lose" anything in there. The refrigerator has a refrigerator-width pullout drawer that I've been using for platters and jelly roll pan-sized items. It has LED lighting, which looks cool :-) We give it four thumbs up between us. Terry "Squeaks" Pulliam Burd -- "If the soup had been as warm as the wine, if the wine had been as old as the turkey, and if the turkey had had a breast like the maid, it would have been a swell dinner." Duncan Hines To reply, remove "spambot" and replace it with "cox" |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 12 Apr 2010 15:59:35 -0600, "gloria.p" >
wrote: >Melba's Jammin' wrote: >> In article >, >> Damaeus > wrote: >>> First, how old are you? My friend's parents (aged 77 and 79) have one of >>> those fridges with the freezer on the bottom, and to me, it's painful to >>> see either one of them have to get down on their hands and knees just to >>> get a glass of ice. >>> Damaeus >> >> ???? I'm having a hard time picturing this. My ice cubes (bottom >> freezer) are at knee level and I barely have to bend at the waist to get >> to them. >> > > >I agree with Ms. Jammin' > >I am quite short and the slide-out drawer containing the icemaker >bin in the lower freezer is just about knee level. No kneeling >required. > And I agree with you both. My bottom freezer ice bin is knee high, too, and I'm 5'8". The only reason I'd have to get down on my hands and knees to get the ice is if I'd been putting that ice in way too many scotch and waters... Terry "Squeaks" Pulliam Burd -- "If the soup had been as warm as the wine, if the wine had been as old as the turkey, and if the turkey had had a breast like the maid, it would have been a swell dinner." Duncan Hines To reply, remove "spambot" and replace it with "cox" |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 12 Apr 2010 15:58:49 -0500, "Pete C." >
wrote: > >Melba's Jammin' wrote: >> >> In article >, >> "Steve B" > wrote: >> >> > We are looking at the double wide refrigerators with the bottom freezers. >> > >> > I am leaning towards the 28 cu. ft. size. Seen a couple of nice ones in the >> > $2,000 to $2,200 range. >> > >> > Anyone have one of these, and if so, would appreciate caveats and things you >> > do and don't like about them. Mainly, we need a larger refrigerator for >> > just the refrigerated items. The freezer would get used, too, but we have a >> > freezer only in the garage, and a combo freezer/fridge. >> >> I have an Amana, 22cf. I will love it until the day they put me in it >> for storage. >> >> When my old Kenmore did its death dance some years ago, I sashayed over >> to Warners-Stellian to select its replacement -- all I wanted was >> essentially what I'd had. I got the same total cf, BUT, in the time >> between the dying one and the new one, the industry standard changed on >> the ratio of chiller space to freezer space. I wasn't paying attention. >> When I chose the new one, a Whirlpool, two door, freezer on top, I had >> the most fleeting thought through my head that the bottom of the freezer >> section door was lower that on the dying one. FLEETING thought I paid >> no attention to. When I got the sucker home and started transferring >> contents from one to 'tother, I had a hard time getting everything into >> the fridge. W T F ??? Total cf was the same. . . . The new model, >> while having the same total cf had more freezer space and less chiller >> space that its predecessor. In the years between the old and the new, >> the amount of freezer space in supermarkets increased DRAMATICALLY >> people had a lot more stuff in their freezers besides vegetables and ice >> cream. >> >> I bitched about that unit for three years. My friend The Late Widow >> Geraldine had bought a bottom-freezer unit and I loved it. I wanted it. >> I got one. Gave the old one (all of 3 miserable years old) to a church >> organization. >> >> My freezer compartment is a pullout drawer with a sliding basket in part >> of it. It is VERY easy to access. I do not have an icemaker; I make >> ice cubes. >> >> NO WAY would I go back to a top freezer unit and am reminded of it every >> time I reach for something in the vegetable drawers, the lowest part of >> that fridge storage at low hip height. Accessing ANYthing in the >> freezer is very easy because I can pull the drawer way out, and it's a >> bend-at-the-waist to get at anything. If that were the chiller space in >> a conventional arrangement, I'd be on my knees trying to find something >> at the back of a shelf, it would be that low. I shudder at the very >> idea. Getting down isn't the problem; getting up is. :-/ >> >> I'll never go back to a freezer-fridge combo with the freezer unit on >> top, and I've never been impressed by the side-by-side freezer/fridge >> configuration. > >I generally prefer a side-by-side configuration if it's the only cold >storage around. With the side-by-side, you can organize both the >refrigerator and freezer sides in a top-down, most frequently used setup >so everything you use frequently is at no-bend height. I also like and >frequently use the in-door ice and water dispenser. > >The bottom drawer freezer models are decent enough, though they >typically result in more stacking of items and more time spent shuffling >through those stacks looking for what you want. I also prefer the single >door models over the double door models as it seems that the double door >models just make the door storage less useable and the half door you >open is rarely the one you need to reach what you wanted on the regular >shelves so you have to open the other as well. > >The mini pass-through doors that are available on some refrigerators are >of limited value and probably not worth bothering with. > >If you have auxiliary cold storage in the garage or similar your >organization can be different and thus the needs for the kitchen cold >storage may vary. > >In all cases, the horrid top freezer models that require bending over >nearly every time you access the refrigerator should be banned as >ergonomic disasters. In my kitchen I have a 22 cf GE Profile top freezer. In my basement I have a 17 cf no frills whirlpool top freezer. I don't find myself reaching into the bottom veggie bins all that often, often just once a day to grab a few deer carrots. I prefer having the two units rather than one huge fridge... I don't like having all my eggs in one basket so to speak... in case one goes on the fritz I still have the other... plus the two smaller units consume less energy that those monster 40 cf units.... for a few months during cold weather I even unplug the basement fridge. Oh, and the fridge in the basement is up on cement blocks just in case of a flooded basement (has happened once), so no bending to access the veggie bins. I much rather have the two smaller units than one huge unit. My mother who was barely 5' loved her bottom freezer, the rest of us were 6', we hated it. Bottom veggie bins are no problem at all, if I'm going to build a salad or a soup where I'll be needing everything I simply pull out the entire bins and put them on the counter. I find it much easier to find stuff in my top freezer than to be dumpster diving a bottom freezer... I'm into my freezer far more than I'm into the veggie bins. I absolutely detest side by sides, they are much too narrow... I'd not use one were it free. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Goomba" > wrote in message ... > Damaeus wrote: > >> First, how old are you? My friend's parents (aged 77 and 79) have one of >> those fridges with the freezer on the bottom, and to me, it's painful to >> see either one of them have to get down on their hands and knees just to >> get a glass of ice. > > huh? I don't have to do anything more strenuous than bend at the waist to > get to my ice. The ice maker is at the top of the bottom freezer space. > And it is still higher up than a fruit/veggie bin at the bottom of a > top-freezer unit. Might not be a consideration for everyone, Goomba. I broke my back nearly two years ago. Crushed one vertebra so I'm officially .5 inches shorter. Locations may be a big consideration, and I had never thought of that before. Steve |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Terry Pulliam Burd" > wrote in message news ![]() > On Mon, 12 Apr 2010 15:59:35 -0600, "gloria.p" > > wrote: > >>Melba's Jammin' wrote: >>> In article >, >>> Damaeus > wrote: >>>> First, how old are you? My friend's parents (aged 77 and 79) have one >>>> of >>>> those fridges with the freezer on the bottom, and to me, it's painful >>>> to >>>> see either one of them have to get down on their hands and knees just >>>> to >>>> get a glass of ice. >>>> Damaeus >>> >>> ???? I'm having a hard time picturing this. My ice cubes (bottom >>> freezer) are at knee level and I barely have to bend at the waist to get >>> to them. >>> >> >> >>I agree with Ms. Jammin' >> >>I am quite short and the slide-out drawer containing the icemaker >>bin in the lower freezer is just about knee level. No kneeling >>required. >> > And I agree with you both. My bottom freezer ice bin is knee high, > too, and I'm 5'8". The only reason I'd have to get down on my hands > and knees to get the ice is if I'd been putting that ice in way too > many scotch and waters... > > Terry "Squeaks" Pulliam Burd Try a single malt. ;-) |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In news:rec.food.cooking, Melba's Jammin' >
posted on Mon, 12 Apr 2010 14:28:40 -0500 the following: > In article >, > Damaeus > wrote: > > First, how old are you? My friend's parents (aged 77 and 79) have one of > > those fridges with the freezer on the bottom, and to me, it's painful to > > see either one of them have to get down on their hands and knees just to > > get a glass of ice. > > Damaeus > > ???? I'm having a hard time picturing this. My ice cubes (bottom > freezer) are at knee level and I barely have to bend at the waist to get > to them. Just make sure nobody's around sweeping the floor when you're getting ice out of the freezer. It's bound to collect more dust being that low. Damaeus -- "Marihuana influences Negroes to look at white people in the eye, step on white men's shadows and look at a white woman twice." -William Randolph Hearst |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 12 Apr 2010 15:59:35 -0600, "gloria.p" >
wrote: >Melba's Jammin' wrote: >> In article >, >> Damaeus > wrote: >>> First, how old are you? My friend's parents (aged 77 and 79) have one of >>> those fridges with the freezer on the bottom, and to me, it's painful to >>> see either one of them have to get down on their hands and knees just to >>> get a glass of ice. >>> Damaeus >> >> ???? I'm having a hard time picturing this. My ice cubes (bottom >> freezer) are at knee level and I barely have to bend at the waist to get >> to them. >> > > >I agree with Ms. Jammin' > >I am quite short and the slide-out drawer containing the icemaker >bin in the lower freezer is just about knee level. No kneeling >required. That's only because of your short stature and only for the items at the very top of the bottom freezer... but you still need to stoop for retrieving items from the bottom of the freezer, and need to constantly remove and replace items, or as most do let the items at the bottom become forgotten. I lived with a bottom freezer for years, they are an awful storage design, like storing all your food in a dumpster... they quickly become as slovenly as a kid's toy chest. There is good reason why less than 5% opt for bottom freezers and why most manufacturers no longer offer bottom freezers... and most appliance stores don't even keep any in stock, they need to be special ordered. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
brooklyn1 wrote:
> That's only because of your short stature and only for the items at > the very top of the bottom freezer... but you still need to stoop for > retrieving items from the bottom of the freezer, and need to > constantly remove and replace items, or as most do let the items at > the bottom become forgotten. I lived with a bottom freezer for years, > they are an awful storage design, like storing all your food in a > dumpster... they quickly become as slovenly as a kid's toy chest. > There is good reason why less than 5% opt for bottom freezers and why > most manufacturers no longer offer bottom freezers... and most > appliance stores don't even keep any in stock, they need to be special > ordered. Sheldon, I'm tall. I have yet to have any problem finding something in my bottom freezer. All the shelves pulled out. All the little jars are my spices, which I keep in the top two shelves http://i43.tinypic.com/2hq42na.jpg The middle compartment, still above knee level- http://i43.tinypic.com/dyu0i1.jpg The very bottom compartment- easily viewed items for selection and only requires a mild bend at the waist to grab. http://i42.tinypic.com/fucs4h.jpg |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article >,
brooklyn1 > wrote: > On Mon, 12 Apr 2010 15:59:35 -0600, "gloria.p" > > wrote: > > >Melba's Jammin' wrote: > >> In article >, > >> Damaeus > wrote: > >>> First, how old are you? My friend's parents (aged 77 and 79) have one of > >>> those fridges with the freezer on the bottom, and to me, it's painful to > >>> see either one of them have to get down on their hands and knees just to > >>> get a glass of ice. > >>> Damaeus > >> > >> ???? I'm having a hard time picturing this. My ice cubes (bottom > >> freezer) are at knee level and I barely have to bend at the waist to get > >> to them. > >> > > > > > >I agree with Ms. Jammin' > > > >I am quite short and the slide-out drawer containing the icemaker > >bin in the lower freezer is just about knee level. No kneeling > >required. > > That's only because of your short stature and only for the items at > the very top of the bottom freezer... but you still need to stoop for > retrieving items from the bottom of the freezer, and need to > constantly remove and replace items, or as most do let the items at > the bottom become forgotten. I lived with a bottom freezer for years, > they are an awful storage design, like storing all your food in a > dumpster... they quickly become as slovenly as a kid's toy chest. > There is good reason why less than 5% opt for bottom freezers and why > most manufacturers no longer offer bottom freezers... and most > appliance stores don't even keep any in stock, they need to be special > ordered. Fail! Sheldon, you are so full of crap on this!! LOL!! How brown are your eyes? <g> I just got off the phone with a sales guy for the biggest appliance store (specialists, not a big box store) in the area (7 stores in MN) and he said that bottom freezers are the fastest growing segment of refrigeration, that all the big mfgrs make them (Whirlpool has 7 brands they make), that Subzero, Viking, Bosch, and Miele offer them, and Frigidaire is about to come out with them, late to the party. He's got more bottom freezer units on his show floor than top freezers. And he said WAY more than 5% of their fridge sales are bottom freezer models. You goof! -- Barb, Mother Superior, HOSSSPoJ http://web.me.com/barbschaller Updated 4-11-2010 |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article >,
Damaeus > wrote: > In news:rec.food.cooking, Melba's Jammin' > > posted on Mon, 12 Apr 2010 14:28:40 -0500 the following: > > > In article >, > > Damaeus > wrote: > > > First, how old are you? My friend's parents (aged 77 and 79) have one of > > > those fridges with the freezer on the bottom, and to me, it's painful to > > > see either one of them have to get down on their hands and knees just to > > > get a glass of ice. > > > Damaeus > > > > ???? I'm having a hard time picturing this. My ice cubes (bottom > > freezer) are at knee level and I barely have to bend at the waist to get > > to them. > > Just make sure nobody's around sweeping the floor when you're getting ice > out of the freezer. It's bound to collect more dust being that low. > > Damaeus No problem with that. I do the sweeping and not when I'm getting ice from the freezer. "-0) I can do more than one thing at a time, but not those two things. :-) -- Barb, Mother Superior, HOSSSPoJ http://web.me.com/barbschaller Updated 4-11-2010 |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Goomba wrote:
>brooklyn1 wrote: > >> That's only because of your short stature and only for the items at >> the very top of the bottom freezer... but you still need to stoop for >> retrieving items from the bottom of the freezer, and need to >> constantly remove and replace items, or as most do let the items at >> the bottom become forgotten. I lived with a bottom freezer for years, >> they are an awful storage design, like storing all your food in a >> dumpster... they quickly become as slovenly as a kid's toy chest. >> There is good reason why less than 5% opt for bottom freezers and why >> most manufacturers no longer offer bottom freezers... and most >> appliance stores don't even keep any in stock, they need to be special >> ordered. > >Sheldon, I'm tall. I have yet to have any problem finding something in >my bottom freezer. Hmm, I wouldn't have any trouble finding what I want either... I'd love to see you hanging over your freezer, all that icy air I bet has a remarkable effect... and the view from the rear might make me think about bottoms, I meant freezers... you know what I think about ![]() >All the shelves pulled out. All the little jars are my spices, which I >keep in the top two shelves >http://i43.tinypic.com/2hq42na.jpg > >The middle compartment, still above knee level- >http://i43.tinypic.com/dyu0i1.jpg > >The very bottom compartment- easily viewed items for selection and only >requires a mild bend at the waist to grab. >http://i42.tinypic.com/fucs4h.jpg All those wire drawers sure waste a lot of freezer space... and I don't really see much food in your freezer. And it's not a good idea to store spices (or anything) in glass containers in the freezer... those cylinders waste a terrible amount of space, especially as they empty and then there is mostly air in the jars, not good for preservation... use zip-locs. I use the nice heavy mylar-like zip bags Penzeys sends, they stack flat with no waste of space, and most all air can be squeezed out. And most importantly, frozen glass becomes extraordinarilly breakable... the few small spice bottles I keep in my freezer (for saffron and the like) I make shatterproof by wrapping in several layers of clear packaging tape. And the saffron is in a small jewelers sized zip bag inside the tiny bottle.... swap all those jar for zip-locs... that'll give you plenty of space for meat. I bet your hubby sold you on that bottom freezer for ulterior motives... I bet he's all the time wanting spicey! LOL http://allrecipes.com/Recipe/Ooey-Go...ns/Detail.aspx |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 09:38:46 -0500, Melba's Jammin'
> wrote: >In article >, > brooklyn1 > wrote: > >> On Mon, 12 Apr 2010 15:59:35 -0600, "gloria.p" > >> wrote: >> >> >Melba's Jammin' wrote: >> >> In article >, >> >> Damaeus > wrote: >> >>> First, how old are you? My friend's parents (aged 77 and 79) have one of >> >>> those fridges with the freezer on the bottom, and to me, it's painful to >> >>> see either one of them have to get down on their hands and knees just to >> >>> get a glass of ice. >> >>> Damaeus >> >> >> >> ???? I'm having a hard time picturing this. My ice cubes (bottom >> >> freezer) are at knee level and I barely have to bend at the waist to get >> >> to them. >> >> >> > >> > >> >I agree with Ms. Jammin' >> > >> >I am quite short and the slide-out drawer containing the icemaker >> >bin in the lower freezer is just about knee level. No kneeling >> >required. >> >> That's only because of your short stature and only for the items at >> the very top of the bottom freezer... but you still need to stoop for >> retrieving items from the bottom of the freezer, and need to >> constantly remove and replace items, or as most do let the items at >> the bottom become forgotten. I lived with a bottom freezer for years, >> they are an awful storage design, like storing all your food in a >> dumpster... they quickly become as slovenly as a kid's toy chest. >> There is good reason why less than 5% opt for bottom freezers and why >> most manufacturers no longer offer bottom freezers... and most >> appliance stores don't even keep any in stock, they need to be special >> ordered. > >Fail! Sheldon, you are so full of crap on this!! LOL!! How brown >are your eyes? <g> I just got off the phone with a sales guy for the >biggest appliance store (specialists, not a big box store) in the area >(7 stores in MN) and he said that bottom freezers are the fastest >growing segment of refrigeration, that all the big mfgrs make them >(Whirlpool has 7 brands they make), that Subzero, Viking, Bosch, and >Miele offer them, and Frigidaire is about to come out with them, late to >the party. He's got more bottom freezer units on his show floor than >top freezers. And he said WAY more than 5% of their fridge sales are >bottom freezer models. You goof! You really think I believe all that... you're in MN... why would anyone in Minnysoda even sell freezers, they'd go broke as selling ice. 90% of the year it's cold as a witch's tit outdoors... all yoose need is an unheated porch. And for your short summers all yoose eat is tater salad, bologna sammiches, and mac n' cheese hot dish. You tryin' to tell me you freeze jam and pickles! LOL |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
brooklyn1 wrote:
> Goomba wrote: >> All the shelves pulled out. All the little jars are my spices, which I >> keep in the top two shelves >> http://i43.tinypic.com/2hq42na.jpg >> >> The middle compartment, still above knee level- >> http://i43.tinypic.com/dyu0i1.jpg >> >> The very bottom compartment- easily viewed items for selection and only >> requires a mild bend at the waist to grab. >> http://i42.tinypic.com/fucs4h.jpg > > All those wire drawers sure waste a lot of freezer space... and I > don't really see much food in your freezer. No, not much meat is kept in the kitchen freezer. We have another full sized upright freezer (as well as another refigerator/top freezer) in the garage. Meat, veggies and other frozen goods go into the upright freezer. TV dinner type things go into the freezer above the refrigerator out there which we use for beer, soda, etc which make it handy for me to grab on my way out the door going to work. My only regret is that the ice maker on the garage fridge isn't operating also. Two ice makers would be very nice for those busy times. > > And it's not a good idea to store spices (or anything) in glass > containers in the freezer... those cylinders waste a terrible amount > of space, especially as they empty and then there is mostly air in the > jars, not good for preservation... use zip-locs. I use the nice heavy > mylar-like zip bags Penzeys sends, they stack flat with no waste of > space, and most all air can be squeezed out. And most importantly, > frozen glass becomes extraordinarilly breakable... the few small spice > bottles I keep in my freezer (for saffron and the like) I make > shatterproof by wrapping in several layers of clear packaging tape. > And the saffron is in a small jewelers sized zip bag inside the tiny > bottle.... swap all those jar for zip-locs... that'll give you plenty > of space for meat. You must not have noticed that I do keep spices in those bags along with the plastic and glass jars Penzeys supplies? > > I bet your hubby sold you on that bottom freezer for ulterior > motives... I bet he's all the time wanting spicey! LOL down! down boy! lol |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Melba's Jammin' wrote:
> In article >, > brooklyn1 > wrote: > >> On Mon, 12 Apr 2010 15:59:35 -0600, "gloria.p" > >> wrote: >> >>> Melba's Jammin' wrote: >>>> In article >, >>>> Damaeus > wrote: >>>>> First, how old are you? My friend's parents (aged 77 and 79) have one of >>>>> those fridges with the freezer on the bottom, and to me, it's painful to >>>>> see either one of them have to get down on their hands and knees just to >>>>> get a glass of ice. >>>>> Damaeus >>>> ???? I'm having a hard time picturing this. My ice cubes (bottom >>>> freezer) are at knee level and I barely have to bend at the waist to get >>>> to them. >>>> >>> >>> I agree with Ms. Jammin' >>> >>> I am quite short and the slide-out drawer containing the icemaker >>> bin in the lower freezer is just about knee level. No kneeling >>> required. >> That's only because of your short stature and only for the items at >> the very top of the bottom freezer... but you still need to stoop for >> retrieving items from the bottom of the freezer, and need to >> constantly remove and replace items, or as most do let the items at >> the bottom become forgotten. I lived with a bottom freezer for years, >> they are an awful storage design, like storing all your food in a >> dumpster... they quickly become as slovenly as a kid's toy chest. >> There is good reason why less than 5% opt for bottom freezers and why >> most manufacturers no longer offer bottom freezers... and most >> appliance stores don't even keep any in stock, they need to be special >> ordered. > > Fail! Sheldon, you are so full of crap on this!! LOL!! How brown > are your eyes? <g> I just got off the phone with a sales guy for the > biggest appliance store (specialists, not a big box store) in the area > (7 stores in MN) and he said that bottom freezers are the fastest > growing segment of refrigeration, that all the big mfgrs make them > (Whirlpool has 7 brands they make), that Subzero, Viking, Bosch, and > Miele offer them, and Frigidaire is about to come out with them, late to > the party. He's got more bottom freezer units on his show floor than > top freezers. And he said WAY more than 5% of their fridge sales are > bottom freezer models. You goof! > Well, going against the trend here... I have been visiting a lot of appliance showrooms and eying refrigerators. (I STILL haven't picked one; it is relatively low-priority because it isn't going to be built it.) Most of the models have bottom freezers, and many have French doors. I want neither, so my hunt is complicated and harder than it should be. (Frequently, one cannot see what the interiors look like when searching online, and even if one can see an interior photo, it really doesn't convey the USABLE depth of the shelves, etc.) -- Jean B. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Melba's Jammin' wrote:
> In article >, > "Steve B" > wrote: > >> We are looking at the double wide refrigerators with the bottom freezers. >> >> I am leaning towards the 28 cu. ft. size. Seen a couple of nice ones in the >> $2,000 to $2,200 range. >> >> Anyone have one of these, and if so, would appreciate caveats and things you >> do and don't like about them. Mainly, we need a larger refrigerator for >> just the refrigerated items. The freezer would get used, too, but we have a >> freezer only in the garage, and a combo freezer/fridge. > > > I have an Amana, 22cf. I will love it until the day they put me in it > for storage. > > When my old Kenmore did its death dance some years ago, I sashayed over > to Warners-Stellian to select its replacement -- all I wanted was > essentially what I'd had. I got the same total cf, BUT, in the time > between the dying one and the new one, the industry standard changed on > the ratio of chiller space to freezer space. I wasn't paying attention. > When I chose the new one, a Whirlpool, two door, freezer on top, I had > the most fleeting thought through my head that the bottom of the freezer > section door was lower that on the dying one. FLEETING thought I paid > no attention to. When I got the sucker home and started transferring > contents from one to 'tother, I had a hard time getting everything into > the fridge. W T F ??? Total cf was the same. . . . The new model, > while having the same total cf had more freezer space and less chiller > space that its predecessor. In the years between the old and the new, > the amount of freezer space in supermarkets increased DRAMATICALLY > people had a lot more stuff in their freezers besides vegetables and ice > cream. > > I bitched about that unit for three years. My friend The Late Widow > Geraldine had bought a bottom-freezer unit and I loved it. I wanted it. > I got one. Gave the old one (all of 3 miserable years old) to a church > organization. > > My freezer compartment is a pullout drawer with a sliding basket in part > of it. It is VERY easy to access. I do not have an icemaker; I make > ice cubes. > > NO WAY would I go back to a top freezer unit and am reminded of it every > time I reach for something in the vegetable drawers, the lowest part of > that fridge storage at low hip height. Accessing ANYthing in the > freezer is very easy because I can pull the drawer way out, and it's a > bend-at-the-waist to get at anything. If that were the chiller space in > a conventional arrangement, I'd be on my knees trying to find something > at the back of a shelf, it would be that low. I shudder at the very > idea. Getting down isn't the problem; getting up is. :-/ > > I'll never go back to a freezer-fridge combo with the freezer unit on > top, and I've never been impressed by the side-by-side freezer/fridge > configuration. > > HTH. > > The ONLY bottom-freezer units that have seemed plausible to me are ones with multiple drawers, so one doesn't end up with a jumbled mess to dredge through. Unfortunately, they seem to be available on only a few very pricy models. Thanks for that tip re fridge space. I do need to be careful about that--unless I usurp part of my daughter's fridge. (I am not thinking that from a power standpoint, I probably should not run THREE fridges plus a freezer!) -- Jean B. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jean B." wrote:
> >I have been visiting a lot of appliance showrooms and eyeing refrigerators. Better than eyeing is to use a tape measure... in your new abode mode you should be carrying a tape measure with you at all times... I have a 6' mini tape measure with me whenever I leave home, can't really shop without it... if you're too cheap to spend the two bucks most any fabric/sewing store will give you a folding paper yardstick for free, they're used in lieu of business cards. Actually eyeballing for dimensions is pretty useless... carry a list of your large kitchenware dimensions... and measure all appliances... I have a small dimensioned diagram of my entire house that I carry in my wallet. The human brain is extremely poor at approximating and retaining visual dimensions... write everything down... I even write down how much paint for each room... I won't hire a house painter, they do a lousy job, use cheap paint, and then water it down. Also when in serious shopping mode bring a digicam... you'll never remember all the appliances you perused let alone their features. When I bought this property I had a survey done (I always have a new survey made for any property I purchase), Surveys indicate all structures, major planted areas, water features, fences, etc. I have a number of copies so on one I pencil in any additions, especially new plantings. >Frequently, one cannot see what the interiors look like when searching online, >and even if one can see an interior photo, it really doesn't convey the >USABLE depth of the shelves, etc.) All the major appliance manufacturers show the specs on their web sites, with detailed diagrams and pictures from every angle imaginable... typically you can download the owner's manual for every model as well... the retailer's web sites won't show much info but the manufacturers do. So have you closed and moved in yet... or is it all still in the fantasy/dream stage... I'm still waiting for *before* pictures... after pictures are pretty meaningless without the before pics. At the rate you're going most present rfc'ers won't be alive when you finally move. lol |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 08:10:02 -0400, "Jean B." > wrote:
>Melba's Jammin' wrote: >> In article >, >> "Steve B" > wrote: >> >>> We are looking at the double wide refrigerators with the bottom freezers. >>> >>> I am leaning towards the 28 cu. ft. size. Seen a couple of nice ones in the >>> $2,000 to $2,200 range. >>> >>> Anyone have one of these, and if so, would appreciate caveats and things you >>> do and don't like about them. Mainly, we need a larger refrigerator for >>> just the refrigerated items. The freezer would get used, too, but we have a >>> freezer only in the garage, and a combo freezer/fridge. >> >> >> I have an Amana, 22cf. I will love it until the day they put me in it >> for storage. >> >> When my old Kenmore did its death dance some years ago, I sashayed over >> to Warners-Stellian to select its replacement -- all I wanted was >> essentially what I'd had. I got the same total cf, BUT, in the time >> between the dying one and the new one, the industry standard changed on >> the ratio of chiller space to freezer space. I wasn't paying attention. >> When I chose the new one, a Whirlpool, two door, freezer on top, I had >> the most fleeting thought through my head that the bottom of the freezer >> section door was lower that on the dying one. FLEETING thought I paid >> no attention to. When I got the sucker home and started transferring >> contents from one to 'tother, I had a hard time getting everything into >> the fridge. W T F ??? Total cf was the same. . . . The new model, >> while having the same total cf had more freezer space and less chiller >> space that its predecessor. In the years between the old and the new, >> the amount of freezer space in supermarkets increased DRAMATICALLY >> people had a lot more stuff in their freezers besides vegetables and ice >> cream. >> >> I bitched about that unit for three years. My friend The Late Widow >> Geraldine had bought a bottom-freezer unit and I loved it. I wanted it. >> I got one. Gave the old one (all of 3 miserable years old) to a church >> organization. >> >> My freezer compartment is a pullout drawer with a sliding basket in part >> of it. It is VERY easy to access. I do not have an icemaker; I make >> ice cubes. >> >> NO WAY would I go back to a top freezer unit and am reminded of it every >> time I reach for something in the vegetable drawers, the lowest part of >> that fridge storage at low hip height. Accessing ANYthing in the >> freezer is very easy because I can pull the drawer way out, and it's a >> bend-at-the-waist to get at anything. If that were the chiller space in >> a conventional arrangement, I'd be on my knees trying to find something >> at the back of a shelf, it would be that low. I shudder at the very >> idea. Getting down isn't the problem; getting up is. :-/ >> >> I'll never go back to a freezer-fridge combo with the freezer unit on >> top, and I've never been impressed by the side-by-side freezer/fridge >> configuration. >> >> HTH. >> >> > >The ONLY bottom-freezer units that have seemed plausible to me are >ones with multiple drawers, so one doesn't end up with a jumbled >mess to dredge through. Unfortunately, they seem to be available >on only a few very pricy models. > >Thanks for that tip re fridge space. I do need to be careful >about that--unless I usurp part of my daughter's fridge. (I am >not thinking that from a power standpoint, I probably should not >run THREE fridges plus a freezer!) I can't imagine living on your own that you'd need more than one fridge... I mainly have my basement fridge because of my veggie gardening. Living in the NE you will likely have a basement... you don't need any fancy schmancy basement fridge, or even very large. My basement fridge (was the kitchen fridge when I moved in) is only 17 cf, has no frills, and often doesn't get opened for weeks, costs very little to operate... for months at a time during winter I don't use it so I unplug it. Between my two top freezers (equals ~10 cf) I don't need any stand alone freezer. Everytime I go down to the basement I bring up some items from that freezer and use those first, before long it's empty, once the freezer and fridge are empty of perishable I unplug it... I also use the fridge portion to store certain canned goods, those help save energy during use, running a fridge/freezer empty or with low mass items wastes energy and makes the units work much harder. But for my main fridge I really like my 22 cf GE Profile top freezer, the interior is well appointed with roll out glass shelves and many pull out washable door compartments that can all be rearranged to suit, in the over 12 years it's never had any need for servicing... I vacuum it well and often, of course I have to with cats, but everyone should regardless. Keep in mind that the mechanicals of a top of the line model is exactly the same as a bottom of the line model, all that changes are the appointments... the fancy schmancy appointments can double the price but utility-wise it's still the same fridge... all the versions roll off the same assembly line. To me the most important feature of a fridge is that it has a porcelainized interior, I wouldn't have a plastic liner in a fridge or freezer, they literally schtink... dishwashers too, they must have a stainless steel interior. For clothes washers however I much prefer porcelainized wash tubs, stainless steel interferes with laundry detergent efficiency, especially with whites, most especially if you have hard water... any of your clothing still has metal zippers/buttons launder with dark colors (and be sure to close all zippers or they can tear your clothing, and opened zippers can become damaged... opened zippers, especially metal, can also seriously damage your machine's agitator). |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jean B. wrote:
> The ONLY bottom-freezer units that have seemed plausible to me are ones > with multiple drawers, so one doesn't end up with a jumbled mess to > dredge through. Unfortunately, they seem to be available on only a few > very pricy models. > > Thanks for that tip re fridge space. I do need to be careful about > that--unless I usurp part of my daughter's fridge. (I am not thinking > that from a power standpoint, I probably should not run THREE fridges > plus a freezer!) > Did you see my photos that I posted here yesterday of my bottom freezer space? Nothing was jumbled. My one large drawer is subdivided by two pull out deep shelves. I love my bottom freezer! I'm glad I didn't get a "French" door model though. One door to open to the fridge. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Steve B" > wrote in message
... > We are looking at the double wide refrigerators with the bottom freezers. Shoot - still unlawful... ;-) Dimitri |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
brooklyn1 wrote:
> "Jean B." wrote: >> I have been visiting a lot of appliance showrooms and eyeing refrigerators. > > Better than eyeing is to use a tape measure... in your new abode mode > you should be carrying a tape measure with you at all times... I have > a 6' mini tape measure with me whenever I leave home, can't really > shop without it... if you're too cheap to spend the two bucks most any > fabric/sewing store will give you a folding paper yardstick for free, > they're used in lieu of business cards. Actually eyeballing for > dimensions is pretty useless... carry a list of your large kitchenware > dimensions... and measure all appliances... I have a small dimensioned > diagram of my entire house that I carry in my wallet. The human brain > is extremely poor at approximating and retaining visual dimensions... > write everything down... I even write down how much paint for each > room... I won't hire a house painter, they do a lousy job, use cheap > paint, and then water it down. Also when in serious shopping mode > bring a digicam... you'll never remember all the appliances you > perused let alone their features. When I bought this property I had a > survey done (I always have a new survey made for any property I > purchase), Surveys indicate all structures, major planted areas, > water features, fences, etc. I have a number of copies so on one I > pencil in any additions, especially new plantings. > >> Frequently, one cannot see what the interiors look like when searching online, >> and even if one can see an interior photo, it really doesn't convey the >> USABLE depth of the shelves, etc.) > > All the major appliance manufacturers show the specs on their web > sites, with detailed diagrams and pictures from every angle > imaginable... typically you can download the owner's manual for every > model as well... the retailer's web sites won't show much info but the > manufacturers do. > > So have you closed and moved in yet... or is it all still in the > fantasy/dream stage... I'm still waiting for *before* pictures... > after pictures are pretty meaningless without the before pics. At the > rate you're going most present rfc'ers won't be alive when you finally > move. lol > > Oh, of course. Eying doesn't take the place of measuring. But you can eliminate some from contention with a quick glance. Hmmm, where IS my little tape measure? I do have a larger one in the car. I need to have a tiny one in my pocket--along with the magnet (aka pot--or should I say pan?--tester). -- Jean B. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
brooklyn1 wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 08:10:02 -0400, "Jean B." > wrote: > >> Melba's Jammin' wrote: >>> In article >, >>> "Steve B" > wrote: >>> >>>> We are looking at the double wide refrigerators with the bottom freezers. >>>> >>>> I am leaning towards the 28 cu. ft. size. Seen a couple of nice ones in the >>>> $2,000 to $2,200 range. >>>> >>>> Anyone have one of these, and if so, would appreciate caveats and things you >>>> do and don't like about them. Mainly, we need a larger refrigerator for >>>> just the refrigerated items. The freezer would get used, too, but we have a >>>> freezer only in the garage, and a combo freezer/fridge. >>> >>> I have an Amana, 22cf. I will love it until the day they put me in it >>> for storage. >>> >>> When my old Kenmore did its death dance some years ago, I sashayed over >>> to Warners-Stellian to select its replacement -- all I wanted was >>> essentially what I'd had. I got the same total cf, BUT, in the time >>> between the dying one and the new one, the industry standard changed on >>> the ratio of chiller space to freezer space. I wasn't paying attention. >>> When I chose the new one, a Whirlpool, two door, freezer on top, I had >>> the most fleeting thought through my head that the bottom of the freezer >>> section door was lower that on the dying one. FLEETING thought I paid >>> no attention to. When I got the sucker home and started transferring >>> contents from one to 'tother, I had a hard time getting everything into >>> the fridge. W T F ??? Total cf was the same. . . . The new model, >>> while having the same total cf had more freezer space and less chiller >>> space that its predecessor. In the years between the old and the new, >>> the amount of freezer space in supermarkets increased DRAMATICALLY >>> people had a lot more stuff in their freezers besides vegetables and ice >>> cream. >>> >>> I bitched about that unit for three years. My friend The Late Widow >>> Geraldine had bought a bottom-freezer unit and I loved it. I wanted it. >>> I got one. Gave the old one (all of 3 miserable years old) to a church >>> organization. >>> >>> My freezer compartment is a pullout drawer with a sliding basket in part >>> of it. It is VERY easy to access. I do not have an icemaker; I make >>> ice cubes. >>> >>> NO WAY would I go back to a top freezer unit and am reminded of it every >>> time I reach for something in the vegetable drawers, the lowest part of >>> that fridge storage at low hip height. Accessing ANYthing in the >>> freezer is very easy because I can pull the drawer way out, and it's a >>> bend-at-the-waist to get at anything. If that were the chiller space in >>> a conventional arrangement, I'd be on my knees trying to find something >>> at the back of a shelf, it would be that low. I shudder at the very >>> idea. Getting down isn't the problem; getting up is. :-/ >>> >>> I'll never go back to a freezer-fridge combo with the freezer unit on >>> top, and I've never been impressed by the side-by-side freezer/fridge >>> configuration. >>> >>> HTH. >>> >>> >> The ONLY bottom-freezer units that have seemed plausible to me are >> ones with multiple drawers, so one doesn't end up with a jumbled >> mess to dredge through. Unfortunately, they seem to be available >> on only a few very pricy models. >> >> Thanks for that tip re fridge space. I do need to be careful >> about that--unless I usurp part of my daughter's fridge. (I am >> not thinking that from a power standpoint, I probably should not >> run THREE fridges plus a freezer!) > > I can't imagine living on your own that you'd need more than one > fridge... I mainly have my basement fridge because of my veggie > gardening. Living in the NE you will likely have a basement... you > don't need any fancy schmancy basement fridge, or even very large. My > basement fridge (was the kitchen fridge when I moved in) is only 17 > cf, has no frills, and often doesn't get opened for weeks, costs very > little to operate... for months at a time during winter I don't use it > so I unplug it. Between my two top freezers (equals ~10 cf) I don't > need any stand alone freezer. Everytime I go down to the basement I > bring up some items from that freezer and use those first, before > long it's empty, once the freezer and fridge are empty of perishable I > unplug it... I also use the fridge portion to store certain canned > goods, those help save energy during use, running a fridge/freezer > empty or with low mass items wastes energy and makes the units work > much harder. But for my main fridge I really like my 22 cf GE Profile > top freezer, the interior is well appointed with roll out glass > shelves and many pull out washable door compartments that can all be > rearranged to suit, in the over 12 years it's never had any need for > servicing... I vacuum it well and often, of course I have to with > cats, but everyone should regardless. Keep in mind that the > mechanicals of a top of the line model is exactly the same as a bottom > of the line model, all that changes are the appointments... the fancy > schmancy appointments can double the price but utility-wise it's still > the same fridge... all the versions roll off the same assembly line. > To me the most important feature of a fridge is that it has a > porcelainized interior, I wouldn't have a plastic liner in a fridge or > freezer, they literally schtink... dishwashers too, they must have a > stainless steel interior. For clothes washers however I much prefer > porcelainized wash tubs, stainless steel interferes with laundry > detergent efficiency, especially with whites, most especially if you > have hard water... any of your clothing still has metal > zippers/buttons launder with dark colors (and be sure to close all > zippers or they can tear your clothing, and opened zippers can become > damaged... opened zippers, especially metal, can also seriously damage > your machine's agitator). > > My daughter will be there too--for how long, who knows. My main problem is that I like cooking esoteric things, and some of the ingredients last pretty much forever in the fridge. Therefore, I have much space full of these things. -- Jean B. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Goomba wrote:
> Jean B. wrote: > >> The ONLY bottom-freezer units that have seemed plausible to me are >> ones with multiple drawers, so one doesn't end up with a jumbled mess >> to dredge through. Unfortunately, they seem to be available on only a >> few very pricy models. >> >> Thanks for that tip re fridge space. I do need to be careful about >> that--unless I usurp part of my daughter's fridge. (I am not thinking >> that from a power standpoint, I probably should not run THREE fridges >> plus a freezer!) >> > Did you see my photos that I posted here yesterday of my bottom freezer > space? Nothing was jumbled. My one large drawer is subdivided by two > pull out deep shelves. I love my bottom freezer! I'm glad I didn't get a > "French" door model though. One door to open to the fridge. I probably still have your post and link here. Sure, I believe one can manage not to have a mess in a bottom freezer, but I have to think of how I use the refrigerator and freezer. The only real pressure to get any fridge at this point is that if I don't, the "after" pics will be crummy--and it will be very unappealing to see a dissonant fridge. Other than that, I tend to think that appliances made in days of yore lasted longer (depending on how far one looks back.) -- Jean B. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
New Reefer Part 2 | General Cooking | |||
New Reefer | General Cooking | |||
The Reefer Arrived! | General Cooking | |||
The Reefer Arrived! | General Cooking | |||
The Reefer Arrived! | General Cooking |